sign in sign up
<<
Home , Acropolis of Athens

From to and back

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters

Citation Nagy, G. 2015.09.10. "From Athens to Crete and back." Classical Inquiries. http://nrs.harvard.edu/ urn-3:hul.eresource:Classical_Inquiries.

Published Version https://classical-inquiries.chs.harvard.edu/from-athens-to-crete- and-back/

Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:39666396

Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Classical Inquiries

Editors: Angelia Hanhardt and Keith Stone Consultant for Images: Jill Curry Robbins Online Consultant: Noel Spencer

About

Classical Inquiries (CI ) is an online, rapid-publication project of Harvard’s Center for Hellenic Studies, devoted to sharing some of the latest thinking on the ancient world with researchers and the general public.

While articles archived in DASH represent the original Classical Inquiries posts, CI is intended to be an evolving project, providing a platform for public dialogue between authors and readers. Please visit http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.eresource:Classical_Inquiries for the latest version of this article, which may include corrections, updates, or comments and author responses.

Additionally, many of the studies published in CI will be incorporated into future CHS pub- lications. Please visit http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.eresource:CHS.Online_Publishing for a complete and continually expanding list of open access publications by CHS.

Classical Inquiries is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 In- ternational License. Every efort is made to use images that are in the public domain or shared under Creative Commons licenses. Copyright on some images may be owned by the Center for Hellenic Studies. Please refer to captions for information about copyright of individual images.

Citing Articles from Classical Inquiries

To cite an article from Classical Inquiries, use the author’s name, the date, the title of the article, and the following persistent identifer: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:hul.eresource:Classical_Inquiries. For example: Nagy, G. 2019.01.31. “Homo Ludens at Play with the Songs of : Experiments in Comparative Reception Teory, Part Four.” Classical Inquiries. http://nrs.harvard.edu/ urn-3:hul.eresource:Classical_Inquiries. Classical Inquiries Studies on the Ancient World from CHS

Home About People

Home » By Gregory Nagy » From Athens to Crete and back From Athens to Crete and back Share This September 10, 2015 By Gregory Nagy listed under By Gregory Nagy 1 Comment Edit This

In my posting for 2015.08.26, I spoke of a “Minoan­Mycenaean ,” not saying “Minoan” and “Mycenaean” separately. That is because, as we saw in the postings for both 2015.08.26 and 2015.09.03, some of the myths that we encounter about as centered on the island of Crete are infused with elements that are distinctly Mycenaean as well as Minoan. And such an infusion has to do with the fact that Minoan civilization, which had evolved in the context of a “Minoan Empire,” as archaeologists know it, was eventually taken over by a “Mycenaean Empire.” This takeover, as I argued already in the postings for both 2015.08.26 and 2015.09.03, resulted in modifications of myths about the Minoan Empire by way of myths about the Mycenaean Empire. Now we will see that these modifications, taking place on the island of Crete, involved the city of Athens as it existed in the Mycenaean era.

Introduction

§0.1. In my posting for 2015.08.26, I spoke of a “Minoan­Mycenaean civilization,” not saying “Minoan” and “Mycenaean” separately. That is because, as we saw in the postings for both 2015.08.26 and 2015.09.03, Classical Inquiries (CI) is an online, some of the myths that we encounter about Minoan civilization as centered on the island of Crete are rapid-publication project of Harvard’s infused with elements that are distinctly Mycenaean as well as Minoan. And such an infusion has to do with Center for Hellenic Studies, devoted to the fact that Minoan civilization, which had evolved in the context of a “Minoan Empire,” as archaeologists sharing some of the latest thinking on know it, was eventually taken over by a “Mycenaean Empire.” This takeover, as I argued already in the the ancient world with researchers and postings for both 2015.08.26 and 2015.09.03, resulted in modifications of myths about the Minoan Empire the general public. by way of myths about the Mycenaean Empire. Now we will see that these modifications, taking place on the island of Crete, involved the city of Athens as it existed in the Mycenaean era. Editor §0.2. I must stress here that the myths stemming from Minoan­Mycenaean civilization need be studied from a diachronic as well as a synchronic perspective. The terms synchronic and diachronic, as I use them here, come from linguistics.[1] When linguists use the word synchronic, they are thinking of a given structure as it exists in a given time and space; when they use diachronic, they are thinking of that Keith Stone structure as it evolves through time.[2] [email protected] A missing link: the Athenian connection

§1. In speaking about a Mycenaean “infusion” into Minoan mythmaking, I have concentrated in the postings Search for: for 2015.08.26 and 2005.09.03 on Athenian myths and rituals concerning the Theseus. But I have not Search yet made it clear why these myths and rituals concerning Theseus, which are of course Athenian myths, are also Mycenaean myths. Here I return to the concept of an “Athenian connection.” Subscribe Now!

§2. I introduced this concept at §§6 and 48 in the posting for 2015.08.26. As I already argued there, the myth about the Ring of Minos, recovered by Theseus from the depths of the , must have aetiologized the idea of a transition from a Minoan thalassocracy to an Athenian thalassocracy. But such an Subscribe to this site to receive email idea did not start with the likes of and in the classical period of the late fifth century updates about the latest research—just BCE. The mythical construct of a connection between the Athenian and the Minoan thalassocracies one or two notices per week. originated not in the classical period. No, in terms of my argument, this myth existed already in the Mycenaean period of Crete. This was the time when the Minoan civilization of that island, which had EU/EEA Privacy Disclosures evolved in the context of a Minoan Empire, was being taken over by Greek­speaking elites of the Mycenaean Empire. These elites came from the mainland of what we call today, yes, but I would be suffering from a “blind spot” if I thought of these Greek­speakers simply as “Mycenaeans”—as if they all came from the Mycenaean of . As we will now see, some of these “Mycenaeans” came from other places in Greece, and one of those places was the Mycenaean­era acropolis in Athens. That is what I mean when I speak of an Athenian connection. Now Online §3. Evidence comes from the tablets found in the so­called Room of the Chariot Tablets at Knossos in Crete. At §§16–23 in the posting for 2015.08.26, I have already spoken about the administrative unit that was in charge of the record­keeping as reflected in the contents of the tablets stored in this room, which can be dated at around 1400 BCE. At §22, I noted with special interest the “Mycenaean” cultural agenda reflected in the written records of the Linear B tablets that are linked to the administrative zone represented by this particular room in the context of the overall administration in the “palace” at Knossos. I quoted the apt formulation of Thomas Palaima, who notes that the administrative unit responsible for keeping written records at the Room of the Chariot Tablets in Knossos was using these records “mainly for the monitoring and distribution of military equipment (chariots, body armo[u]r, horses) to a Greek­ dominated military élite.”[3] And I already said back then, at §22, that the name for such a military élite would have been Akhaioí ‘Achaeans’. But now I will also say that some of these ‘Achaeans’ were Athenians. To say it another way, at least some of the “Mycenaeans” who were running the administration of the labyrinthine “palace” at Knossos around 1400 BCE must have been Athenians.

§4. For me the “smoking gun” that proves the Athenian provenience of at least some of the “Mycenaeans” who ran the administration of Knossos around 1400 BCE is the name of one of the divinities listed in one of the Linear B texts found in the so­called Room of the Chariot Tablets. The text is written in the Knossos tablet V 52, and the name of the divinity in line one of that text is a­ta­na­po­ti­ni­ja. An article published in 2001 by Joann Gulizio, Kevin Pluta, and Thomas Palaima argues persuasively that the name of this divinity is to be read as Athānās potnia and needs to be interpreted as ‘[our] Lady of Athens’, not as ‘our Lady [the goddess] ’.[4]

§5. If it is true that the goddess who is featured so prominently in the pantheon of divinities recorded in Knossos tablet V 52 is ‘our Lady of Athens’, then we see here a direct reference to the goddess of the acropolis of Athens in mainland Greece, specifically, in .

§6. In Homeric poetry, the name in question here is Athḗnē. This name applies both to the goddess known in English as ‘Athena’, as at 7.78, and to the place that is seen as the possession of the goddess— which is the territory of the place known in English as ‘Athens’, as at Odyssey 7.80.[5] The suffix ­ḗnē is visible also in the name of the nymph Mukḗnē, who presides over the acropolis of Mycenae.[6]

§7. The same suffix ­ḗnē is visible also in the place­name Messḗnē, which means something like ‘Midland’. [7] Here I compare the place­name me­za­na written on a Linear B tablet from Pylos, Cn 3.1. On the basis of this comparison, I have observed elsewhere: “I suspect that the suffix ­ḗnē is endowed with an elliptic function.”[8] What I meant there when I made that observation is this: a form that is elliptic refers not only to X but also to everything that belongs to X, such as X2, X3, X4 etc. An elliptic form of X implies X2, X3, X4 etc. without naming X2, X3, X4 etc. explicitly. In terms of this definition, the name Athḗnē refers not only to the goddess ‘Athena’ but also to everything that belongs to the goddess. The primary example of that ‘everything’ here is the acropolis of Athens. And we see another level of ellipsis in the plural form Top Posts & Pages Athênai: this elliptic plural refers not only to the acropolis of Athens but also to everything that belongs to the acropolis of Athens, which is the city of Athens, and, by extension, to everything that belongs to the city, which is ultimately the region of Attica.[9] The Last Words of at §8. I see a parallel situation in the use of the form Aswia (/Aswiās) in the Linear B texts, where Aswia is evidently a goddess, as we see from the collocation po­ti­ni­ja a­si­wi­ja = potnia Aswia ‘[Our] Lady Aswia’ the Place Where He Died as written on a tablet from Pylos, Fr 1208. In the case of Aswia, the name survives into the classical period Who is the best of heroes, of recorded texts in the fifth century BCE and later: now the name is pronounced Asíā, meaning ‘Asia’, and Achilles or Odysseus? And which the referent here is what we call ‘Asia Minor’ in English. So, from a diachronic perspective, this name applies both to the goddess and to the realm of the goddess. She is ‘Our Lady of Asia’ or ‘Asia’ personified. is the best of epics, the Iliad or the Odyssey? §9. I emphasize here that the form Athḗnē at line 80 of Odyssey 7 is the only instance, in all surviving texts ever written in the language, where the name of the place ‘Athens’ is found in the singular, A Roll of the Dice for Ajax not in the plural. Everywhere else in attested Greek, we read the elliptic plural Athênai, which I now interpret to mean ‘everything that belongs to the acropolis of Athḗnē’. And there is also a deeper level of ellipsis here: the suffix ­ḗnē of Athḗnē indicates that the goddess Athena is also a personification of the place of Athena, which is the acropolis of Athens and, by extension, the city of Athens, and by further Most Common Tags extension, everything that belongs to the city of Athens.

What is missing so far in the big picture? Achilles apobatēs Ariadne §10. At this point in my analysis of an “Athenian connection” between the Minoan and the Mycenaean Athena Athens empires, I have concentrated on the goddess Athena as she was pictured in the second millennium BCE. Catullus chariot fighting But there is more to it. In the posting that will follow this one, I will concentrate on a female character in myth who is another essential element that is needed for reconstructing the “Athenian connection.” As we will see, this character seems to be mortal, not immortal. At this point, I would rather not give away her Commentary name. But I show here an image that previews her identity. This image, produced by the brilliant Demodokos Dionysus etymology researcher Mark Cameron, shows this female figure as she was represented in Minoan fresco paintings. The Gregory Nagy H24H HAA image is a reconstruction from fragments, but this reconstruction will give us the big picture that I will need for tracing further my thread of argumentation. travel-study Helen Hera Herodotus

Here it is: Hippolytus

Homeric epic Iliad Jean Bollack lament Lelantine War mimesis Minoan Empire Mycenae Odysseus

Odyssey Poetics Posidippus

Sappho Theseus weaving Zeus From a fresco found at Hagia Triadha in Crete. Reconstruction by Mark Cameron, p. 96 of the catalogue Fresco: A Passport into the Past, 1999 (for an expanded citation, see the Bibliography below). Reproduced with the permission of the British School at Athens. BSA Archive: Mark Cameron Personal Papers: CAM 1. Archives

Archives Bibliography

Driessen, J. 2010. The Scribes of the Room of the Chariot Tablets at Knossos: Interdisciplinary Approach to Users the Study of a Linear B Deposit. Minos Supplement 15. Salamanca.

Fresco: A Passport into the Past. 1999. A catalogue curated by Doniert Evely. Full title: Fresco: A Passport into the Past. Minoan Crete through the eyes of Mark Cameron. Athens: British School at Athens and N. P. Goulandris Foundation, Museum of Cycladic Art. Log out

Gulizio, J., Pluta, K., and Palaima, T.G. 2001. “Religion in the Room of the Chariot Tablets.” In: Potnia: Deities and Religion in the Aegean Bronze Age. Proceedings of the 8th International Aegean Conference held in Göteborg, Sweden, 12–15 April 2000 (ed. R. Laffineur and R. Hägg) 453–61. Liège.

Morris, S. P. 1989. “A Tale of Two Cities: The Miniature Frescoes from Thera and the Origins of Greek Poetry.” American Journal of Archaeology 93:511–535.

Muellner, L. 1976. The Meaning of Homeric EYXOMAI through its Formulas. Innsbruck.

Nagy, G. 1972. Introduction, Parts I and II, and Conclusions. Greek: A Survey of Recent Work (F. W. Householder and G. Nagy) 15–72. Janua Linguarum Series Practica 211. The Hague.

Nagy, G. 2003. Homeric Responses. Austin.

Nagy, G. 2004. Homer’s Text and Language. Urbana and Chicago IL.

Nagy, G. 2005. “The Epic Hero.” A Companion to Ancient Epic (ed. J. M. Foley) 71–89. Oxford.

Nagy, G. 2006. “The Epic Hero.” Expanded version of Nagy 2005.

Nagy, G. 2008. Greek: An Updating of a Survey of Recent Work. Cambridge MA and Washington, DC. Updating of Nagy 1972, with new paragraph­numbers, but the original page­numbering is also indicated.

Nagy, G. 2011. “Diachrony and the Case of .” Classics@. Issue 9: Defense Mechanisms in Interdisciplinary Approaches to Classical Studies and Beyond.

Nagy, G. 2015.07.22. “East of the Achaeans: Making up for a missed opportunity while reading Hittite texts.”

Palaima, T. 2003. “ ‘Archives’ and ‘Scribes’ and Information Hierarchy in Mycenaean Greek Linear B Records.” In: Ancient Archives and Archival Traditions: Concepts of Record­Keeping in the Ancient World (ed. M. Brosius) 153–94. Oxford.

Palaiologou, H. 2013. “Late Helladic IIIC cremation burials at Chania of Mycenae.” Cremation burials in the region between the middle Danube and the Aegean, 1300–750 BC (ed. M. Lochner and F. Ruppenstein) 249–79. Vienna.

Palaiologou, H. 2014. “The Plain of Mycenae during the 13th Century BC and Later.” Physis: Environnement naturel et la relation homme­milieu dans le monde égéen protohistorique. Actes de la 14e rencontre égéenne internationale, Paris, Institut National de l’Institut de l’Art, 11–14 décembre 2012 (ed. G. Touchais, R. Laffineur, and F. Rougemont) 517–19. Leuven­Liège.

Saussure, F. de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Critical ed. 1972 by T. de Mauro. Paris.

Saussure, F. de. 1966. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. W. Baskin. New York.

Notes

[1] See Nagy 2003:1, with reference to Saussure 1916:117.

[2] On diachronic as distinct from historical perspectives, see Nagy 2011.

[3] Palaima 2003:164. Dreissen 2008:71 makes a relevant observation with reference to the Linear B tablets found at Chanià in West Crete and dated around 1300 BCE: one of these tablets (Sq 1) concerns chariot wheels.

[4] Gulizio, Pluta, and Palaima 2001, especially pp. 457–58.

[5] Commentary in Nagy 2004:159–64.

[6] See Nagy 2004:163; also Palaiologou 2013:250n5.

[7] Nagy 2004:163n17.

[8] Again, Nagy 2004:163n17.

[9] See also Muellner 1976:70, who notes that the singular form of Athḗnē vs. the plural form Athênai can in fact refer to the place that we know as ‘Athens’. Muellner also analyzes the elliptic function of the plural form here. On the elliptic plural in general, see Nagy 2004:157–75.