DOCSLIB.ORG

Electrical District 5 - Palo Verde Hub Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Electrical District 5 - Palo Verde Hub Project Draft Environmental Assessment ELECTRICAL DISTRICT 5 - PALO VERDE HUB PROJECT Western No: DOE/EA-1864 Prepared for: US Departmentp of Energygy Western Area Power Administration DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DOE/EA-1864 Electrical District 5 – Palo Verde Hub Project Maricopa and Pinal Counties, Arizona US Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Customer Service Region 615 South 43rd Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85009 June 2011 This page is intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED ................................................................................................... 5 1.3 CONFORMANCE WITH RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLANS AND OTHER LAND USE PLANS ........................................................................................................ 6 1.4 APPLICABLE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND REQUIRED COORDINATION ........................................................................................................... 7 1.5 PERMITS, LICENSES, AND ENTITLEMENTS ........................................................... 7 1.6 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW ....................................................................................... 8 1.7 SCOPING ......................................................................................................................... 8 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES .......................................................... 11 2.1 PROPOSED ACTION ................................................................................................... 11 2.1.1 Proposed Transmission Line Segments .................................................................. 15 2.1.2 Substations .............................................................................................................. 15 2.1.3 Right-Of-Way ......................................................................................................... 17 2.1.4 Construction Activities and Schedule ..................................................................... 17 2.1.5 Transmission Corridor and Access Roads .............................................................. 17 2.1.6 Design ..................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.7 Site Clearing............................................................................................................ 20 2.1.8 Electrical Outages ................................................................................................... 20 2.1.9 Excavation and Foundations ................................................................................... 21 2.1.10 Structure Assembly and Erection............................................................................ 21 2.1.11 Conductor Stringing ................................................................................................ 22 2.1.12 Operation and Maintenance .................................................................................... 23 2.1.13 Ground Disturbance ................................................................................................ 23 2.2 RESOURCE PROTECTION MEASURES ................................................................... 24 2.3 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE ..................................................................................... 24 2.4 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED BUT NOT FURTHER EVALUATED ................. 25 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ....... 26 3.1 RESOURCES CONSIDERED BUT NOT FURTHER EVALUATED ........................ 26 3.1.1 Water Resources ..................................................................................................... 26 3.1.2 Wild and Scenic Rivers ........................................................................................... 27 3.1.3 Geology, Mineral, and Soil Resources ................................................................... 27 3.1.4 Noise ....................................................................................................................... 28 3.1.5 Air Quality .............................................................................................................. 28 3.1.6 Solid Wastes and Hazardous Materials................................................................... 29 3.2 FLOODPLAIN ............................................................................................................... 29 3.2.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 29 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................................. 30 Electrical District 5 – Palo Verde Hub Project DOE/EA-1864 page i Draft Environmental Assessment 3.3 LAND USE AND OWNERSHIP .................................................................................. 33 3.3.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 33 3.3.1.1 Land Ownership and Jurisdiction .................................................................... 33 3.3.1.2 Planned Land Use and Zoning......................................................................... 33 3.3.1.3 Prime and Unique Farmlands .......................................................................... 34 3.3.1.4 Recreation ........................................................................................................ 35 3.3.1.5 Wilderness Areas ............................................................................................. 36 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................................. 39 3.4 VISUAL ......................................................................................................................... 40 3.4.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 40 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................................. 41 3.5 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ....................................................................................... 42 3.5.1 Vegetation ............................................................................................................... 43 3.5.1.1 Affected Environment ..................................................................................... 43 3.5.1.2 Environmental Consequences Native Plants ................................................... 45 3.5.1.3 Environmental Consequences Invasive Plants ................................................ 46 3.5.2 Wildlife ................................................................................................................... 47 3.5.2.1 Affected Environment ..................................................................................... 47 3.5.2.2 Environmental Consequences.......................................................................... 48 3.5.3 Threatened and Endangered Species ...................................................................... 52 3.5.3.1 Affected Environment ..................................................................................... 52 3.5.3.2 Environmental Consequences.......................................................................... 54 3.5.4 Sensitive and Special Status Species ...................................................................... 57 3.5.4.1 Affected Environment ..................................................................................... 57 3.5.4.2 Environmental Consequences.......................................................................... 58 3.6 CULTURAL RESOURCES .......................................................................................... 60 3.6.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 60 3.6.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................................. 63 3.6.3 Native American Religious Concerns ..................................................................... 65 3.6.3.1 Environmental Consequences.......................................................................... 65 3.7 SOCIOECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE/TITLE IV ..................... 66 3.7.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 66 3.7.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................................. 67 3.8 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY ............................................................................... 68 3.8.1 Affected Environment ............................................................................................. 68 3.8.1.1 Emergency Infrastructure ................................................................................ 68 3.8.1.2 Public and Worker Safety ................................................................................ 68 3.8.1.3 Electric and Magnetic Fields ........................................................................... 69 3.8.2 Environmental Consequences ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TRENDS in PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey Report of Selected IEA Countries Between 1992 and 2011
    TRENDS IN PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2011 Report IEA-PVPS T1-21:2012 TRENDS IN PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2011 Contents Introduction 2 1 Implementation of PV systems 3 2 The PV industry 24 3 Policy, regulatory and business framework for deployment 32 4 Summary of trends 39 PV technology note 44 Foreword This year’s 17th edition of the IEA PVPS international survey report on Trends in Photovoltaic (PV) Applications falls together with almost 20 years of global cooperation within the IEA PVPS The International Energy Agency (IEA), founded in 1974, Programme. The history of PV market deployment over this is an autonomous body within the framework of the decisive period for PV from its very first market developments to Organization for Economic Cooperation and the present large scale deployment, meanwhile accounting for Development (OECD). The IEA carries out a important shares of the newly installed capacity for electricity comprehensive programme of energy cooperation production, can uniquely be followed year by year in the series among its 28 member countries and with the of IEA PVPS trends reports. 2011 has been yet another year of unprecedented further market growth, continued massive participation of the European Commission. cost reduction and ongoing signs of industry and market consolidation. In total, about 28 GW of PV capacity were The IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme installed in the IEA PVPS countries during 2011 (2010: 14,2 GW), (IEA PVPS) is one of the collaborative research and thus again doubling the installed capacity of the year before; this development agreements within the IEA and was raised the total installed capacity in IEA PVPS countries close to established in 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.17 Indirect and Cumulative Effects
    FHWA-AZ-EIS-19-01-D Draft Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Section 4(f) Evaluation Section 3.17, Indirect and Cumulative Effects March 2019 Federal Aid No. 999-M(161)S ADOT Project No. 999 SW 0 M5180 01P This page intentionally left blank I-11 Corridor Draft Tier 1 EIS Section 3.17. Indirect and Cumulative Effects 1 3.17 Indirect and Cumulative Effects 2 This section identifies potential indirect and cumulative effects that would result from the 3 implementation of the Build Corridor Alternatives. 4 3.17.1 Regulatory Guidance 5 The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) states that indirect effects “are caused by the 6 action and are later in time or farther removed in distance, but are still reasonably foreseeable. 7 Indirect effects may include growth-inducing effects and other effects related to induced 8 changes in the pattern of land use, population density or growth rate, and related effects on air 9 and water and other natural systems, including ecosystems” (Code of Federal Regulations 10 Title 40, Sec. 1508.8[b]). Indirect effects are commonly categorized as effects that would not 11 occur “but for” the implementation of a project. Indirect effects also can be considered “ripple 12 effects” (Transportation Research Board 2002). 13 The CEQ states that cumulative effects result from the “incremental impact of an action when 14 added to other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of which 15 agency (federal or non-federal) or person undertakes such actions. Cumulative effects can 16 result from individually minor, but collectively significant actions taking place over a period of 17 time” (Code of Federal Regulations title 40, sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Is Driving a Global Shift in Electricity Markets
    SOLAR IS DRIVING A GLOBAL SHIFT IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS Rapid Cost Deflation and Broad Gains in Scale May 2018 Tim Buckley, Director of Energy Finance Studies, Australasia ([email protected]) and Kashish Shah, Research Associate ([email protected]) Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 2 1. World’s Largest Operational Utility-Scale Solar Projects ........................................... 4 1.1 World’s Largest Utility-Scale Solar Projects Under Construction ............................ 8 1.2 India’s Largest Utility-Scale Solar Projects Under Development .......................... 13 2. World’s Largest Concentrated Solar Power Projects ............................................... 18 3. Floating Solar Projects ................................................................................................ 23 4. Rooftop Solar Projects ................................................................................................ 27 5. Solar PV With Storage ................................................................................................. 31 6. Corporate PPAs .......................................................................................................... 39 7. Top Renewable Energy Utilities ................................................................................. 44 8. Top Solar Module Manufacturers .............................................................................. 49 Conclusion .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BC-TES-TMP-2443.Pdf (5.514Mb)
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL “PEDRO RUIZ GALLO” Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica TESIS Para Optar el Título Profesional de INGENIERO MECÁNICO ELECTRICISTA “UTILIZACIÓN DE LA ENERGÍA EÓLICA Y SOLAR COMO FUENTE PARA EL SUMINISTRO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA AL CASERÍO ALTO PONGOYA EN CHIMBAN PROVINCIA DE CHOTA DEPARTAMENTO DE CAJAMARCA” Presentado Por: Bach. KEVIN ARNOLD TARRILLO VÁSQUEZ Asesor: Msc. Ing. JONY VILLALOBOS CABRERA LAMBAYEQUE – PERÚ Enero del 2019 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL “PEDRO RUIZ GALLO” Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica TESIS Para Optar el Título Profesional de INGENIERO MECÁNICO ELECTRICISTA “UTILIZACIÓN DE LA ENERGÍA EÓLICA Y SOLAR COMO FUENTE PARA EL SUMINISTRO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA ALELECTRICISTA CASERÍO ALTO PONGOYA EN CHIMBAN PROVINCIA DE CHOTA DEPARTAMENTO DE CAJAMARCA” Presentado Por: Bach. KEVIN ARNOLD TARRILLO VÁSQUEZ Aprobado por el Jurado Examinador PRESIDENTE: Dr. DANIEL CARRANZA MONTENEGRO. SECRETARIO: ING. CARLOS JAVIER COTRINA SAAVEDRA. MIEMBRO: ING. TEOBALDO EDGAR JULCA OROZCO. ASESOR: M.Sc. JONY VILLALOBOS CABRERA. LAMBAYEQUE – PERÚ Enero del 2019 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL “PEDRO RUIZ GALLO” Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica TESIS TITULO “UTILIZACIÓN DE LA ENERGÍA EÓLICA Y SOLAR COMO FUENTE PARA EL SUMINISTRO DE ENERGÍA ELÉCTRICA AL CASERÍO ALTO PONGOYA EN CHIMBAN PROVINCIA DE CHOTA DEPARTAMENTO DE CAJAMARCA” CONTENIDOS CAPITULO I: PROBLEMA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN. CAPITULO II: MARCO TEÓRICO. CAPITULO III: MARCO METODOLÓGICO. CAPITULO IV: PROPUESTA DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN. CAPITULO V: ANÁLISIS E INTERPRETACIÓN DE LOS RESULTADOS. CAPITULO VI: CONCLUSIONES Y RECOMENDACIONES. AUTOR: Bach. KEVIN ARNOLD TARRILLO VÁSQUEZ --------------------------------- --------------------------------------- PRESIDENTE SECRETARIO ---------------------------------- ------------------------------------- MIEMBRO ASESOR LAMBAYEQUE – PERÚ Enero del 2019 DEDICATORIA Dedico éste Proyecto de Tesis a: Dios ya que gracias a Él he llegado a concluir una de mis metas la cual es concluir con mi carrera.
    [Show full text]
  • Andres Meesak Päikeseelekter TE2018.Pdf
    Päikeseenergeetika Eestis aprill 2018 Andres Meesak Eesti Päikeseelektri Assotsiatsioon Motivaatorid taastuvenergia lahenduste kasutuselevõtuks • Regulatiivsed – ma pean – (hoonete energiatõhususe nõuded, nõue piirata KHG emissiooni, ...) • Majanduslikud – see on mulle kasulik – (sääst igakuistelt energiakuludelt) • Maailmavaatelised – ma tahan säästa keskkonda Juba aastaid näitavad Eurobaromeetri uuringud (2008., 2009., 2011. ja 2014. aasta küsitlusvoorud), et eestlased on eurooplaste seas üks kliimamuutusi kõige vähem tähtsustavaid rahvaid. Justkui elaksime siin Euroopa perifeerias metsade varjus vanajumala selja taga puutumatuna globaalselt üha kriitilisemaks muutuvast magevee probleemist, põudadest, sagenevatest kuumalainetest ja üleujutustest. Kati Orru, Tartu Ülikooli keskkonnasotsioloog EPL 10.12.2015 Euroopa Liidu Hoonete energiatõhususe direktiiv (2010/31/EL): 01.01.2019 kõik riigi poolt kasutatavad uusehitised 01.01.2021 KÕIK uusehitised KAS LIGINULL VÕI NULLENERGIA HOONED Alates 2021 lisandub aastas ~ 25MW tootmisvõimsust uusehitiste näol, mis toodavad aastas ~ 20-25 GWh elektrit Euroopa Liidu Hoonete energiatõhususe direktiiv (2010/31/EL): Päikeseenergeetika Eestis 2018 Päikeseenergeetika Eestis 2017 - Installeeritud koguvõimsus ca. 19MW - Installeeritud 2017 ca. 7MW +50% +27% +45% +51% +59% +60% - Kokku tootjaid ca. 1100 - Suurimad jaamad 1MW (Kärdla, Kareda) - Valdavalt kuni 15kW erapaigaldised - Fortum Eesti kavandab Tartusse Raadile 50MW võimsusega jaama Aasta keskmine juurdekasv 48% ETEK Taastuvenergia aastaraamat 2017
    [Show full text]
  • Photovoltaics Outlook for Minnesota
    Photovoltaics Outlook for Minnesota Saving dollars, not polar bears Steve Campbell [email protected] University of Minnesota Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Outline • Why solar? • Solar technologies and how they work • Utility versus distributed generation • On the horizon Types of Solar Power Photovoltaics Concentrated Solar Power The Lede We are rapidly approaching an era when the choice to install solar energy will be primarily driven by cost, even without subsidies. One can expect to see significant distributed and utility-scale deployment over the next decade. Large-scale energy storage is an unsolved problem. There’s Power and There’s Power • A solar installation is rated in the power it would produce in watts at a standard level of illumination: AM1.5. • To compare different technologies, one uses the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) must take into account many factors – Availability – Operating costs – Depreciation Cost of Electricity in the US • Grid Parity depends of location – Hawaii – West Texas – Parts of CA depending on usage Trends for PV Modules • Price drops as efficiency and manufacturing improve • They will be free in three more years 04/03/13 Solar Cell Module Spot prices High ($/Wp) Low($/Wp) Si Module 0.99 0.55 Thin Film Module 0.94 0.52 Jelle et al. Solar Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 100, 69-96 (2012). The Result of Falling Costs PV production doubles every ~ 2.5 years At the current rate, we will have 1 TW of capacity in 10 years and ~4 TW in 20 years. The later would be about 15% of the total energy supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Impact Analysis Psc Ref#:409444
    PSC REF#:409444 Public Service Commission of Wisconsin RECEIVED: 04/15/2021 2:05:23 PM MARKET IMPACT ANALYSIS KOSHKONONG SOLAR ENERGY CENTER DANE COUNTY, WISCONSIN April 13, 2021 Koshkonong Solar Energy Center LLC c/o Invenergy LLC One South Wacker Drive – Suite 1800 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Attention: Aidan O’Connor, Associate - Renewable Development Subject: Market Impact Analysis Koshkonong Solar Energy Center Dane County, Wisconsin Dear Mr. O’Connor, In accordance with your request, the proposed development of the Koshkonong Solar Energy Center in Dane County, Wisconsin, has been analyzed and this market impact analysis has been prepared. MaRous & Company has conducted similar market impact studies for a variety of clients and for a number of different proposed developments over the last 39 years. Clients have ranged from municipalities, counties, and school districts, to corporations, developers, and citizen’s groups. The types of proposals analyzed include commercial developments such as shopping centers and big-box retail facilities; religious facilities such as mosques and mega-churches; residential developments such as high- density multifamily and congregate-care buildings and large single-family subdivisions; recreational uses such as skate parks and lighted high school athletic fields; and industrial uses such as waste transfer stations, landfills, and quarries. We also have analyzed the impact of transmission lines on adjacent residential uses and a number of proposed natural gas-fired electric plants in various locations. MaRous & Company has conducted numerous market studies of energy-related projects. The solar- related projects include the following by state: ⁘ Wisconsin - Badger Hollow Solar Farm in Iowa County, Paris Solar Energy Center in Kenosha County, Darien Solar Energy Center in Rock County and Walworth County, and Grant County Solar in Grant County.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Comments Letter
    UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 May 2, 2011 Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Attn: Ms. Linda Resseguie BLM Solar PEIS Project Manager 1849 C Street, N.W., Room 2134LM Washington DC, 20240 Subject: Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States [CEQ# 20100466] Dear Ms. Resseguie, The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed the Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS; Solar PEIS; Draft PEIS) for Solar Energy Development in Six Southwestern States, including Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, and Utah. Our review was conducted pursuant to Section 309 of the Clean Air Act, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA implementing regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508). EPA Region 9 has coordinated with EPA Regions 6 and 8 and EPA Headquarters to provide these comments. EPA strongly supports the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and Department of Energy (DOE) efforts to develop a new Solar Energy Program. Accelerating the pace of development of renewable energy resources, such as solar power, will help the nation meet its energy demand, create new jobs, reduce our dependence on imported oil, and provide for increased energy security, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As with any program of this magnitude, thoughtful planning is critical to avoid and minimize unintended adverse consequences. Based on our review of the Draft PEIS, we have rated the document as Environmental Objections – Insufficient Information (EO-2). An “EO” signifies that EPA’s review of the Draft PEIS has identified potential significant environmental impacts that should be avoided in order to provide adequate protection for the environment, including but not limited to disruption of surface and groundwater hydrology, and fragmentation of desert ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Solar Market Insight Report | Q4 2011 & 2011 Year-In-Review | Full Report
    Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q4 Q3 Q2 Q1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 U.S. SOLAR MARKET INSIGHT REPORT | Q4 2011 & 2011 YEAR-IN-REVIEW | FULL REPORT A Greentech Media Company U.S. Solar Market Insight ™ U.S. Solar Market InsightTM TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 5 2. PHOTOVOLTAICS (PV) 6 2.1 Installations 8 2.1.1 Shipments vs. Installations 9 2.1.2 By Market Segment 10 2.1.3 By State 17 2.2 Installed Price 31 2.3 Manufacturing 36 2.3.1 Active U.S. Manufacturing Plants 38 2.3.2 New Plants in 2012 and 2013 39 2.3.3 Polysilicon 41 2.3.4 Wafers 41 2.3.5 Cells 42 2.3.6 Modules 42 2.3.7 Inverters 44 2.4 Component Pricing 49 2.4.1 Polysilicon, Wafers, Cells and Modules 49 2.4.2 Inverters 50 2.5 Installation Forecast 50 3. CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER (CSP) 54 3.1 Installations 54 3.2 Manufacturing Production 57 3.3 Demand Projections 57 APPENDIX A: METRICS & CONVERSIONS 60 PHOTOVOLTAICS 60 CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER 60 APPENDIX B: METHODOLOGY AND DATA SOURCES 61 HISTORICAL INSTALLATIONS (NUMBER, CAPACITY, AND OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE): 61 AVERAGE SYSTEM PRICE: 62 MANUFACTURING PRODUCTION & COMPONENT PRICING: 63 A Greentech Media Company © Copyright 2012 SEIA/GTM Research 2 U.S. Solar Market Insight ™ U.S. Solar Market InsightTM LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • TRENDS in PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey Report of Selected IEA Countries Between 1992 and 2011
    TRENDS IN PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2011 Report IEA-PVPS T1-21:2012 TRENDS IN PHOTOVOLTAIC APPLICATIONS Survey report of selected IEA countries between 1992 and 2011 Contents Introduction 2 1 Implementation of PV systems 3 2 The PV industry 24 3 Policy, regulatory and business framework for deployment 32 4 Summary of trends 39 PV technology note 44 Foreword This year’s 17th edition of the IEA PVPS international survey report on Trends in Photovoltaic (PV) Applications falls together with almost 20 years of global cooperation within the IEA PVPS The International Energy Agency (IEA), founded in 1974, Programme. The history of PV market deployment over this is an autonomous body within the framework of the decisive period for PV from its very first market developments to Organization for Economic Cooperation and the present large scale deployment, meanwhile accounting for Development (OECD). The IEA carries out a important shares of the newly installed capacity for electricity comprehensive programme of energy cooperation production, can uniquely be followed year by year in the series among its 28 member countries and with the of IEA PVPS trends reports. 2011 has been yet another year of unprecedented further market growth, continued massive participation of the European Commission. cost reduction and ongoing signs of industry and market consolidation. In total, about 28 GW of PV capacity were The IEA Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme installed in the IEA PVPS countries during 2011 (2010: 14,2 GW), (IEA PVPS) is one of the collaborative research and thus again doubling the installed capacity of the year before; this development agreements within the IEA and was raised the total installed capacity in IEA PVPS countries close to established in 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Lihula Energiakonverents 2015
    Lihula energiakonverents 17.04.2015 Andres Meesak @AndresMeesak • 9 kW tootmisvõimsus • Tootmise algus august 2012 • Tänaseks toodetud 27 000 kWh elektrit Millest räägin? 1. Mikrotootmine – mis see on? 2. Negavatid 3. Päikese potentsiaal Eestis 4. Tänaseks toimunud arengud 5. Tarbimine omatarbeks. Kuidas planeerida võimsusi... 6. Energiaühistud kellele ja milleks? Mikrotootmine – mis ja milleks? • Energia mikrotootmine on kodumajapidamise või väikeettevõtte poolt tarbimiskohas või selle vahetus läheduses (elektri)energia tootmine, mille eesmärk on katta eelkõige tootja enda vajadusi . • Mikrotootmisena saab käsitleda ka rühmade või ühistute väikesemahulise tootmise eri vorme, mille eesmärk on toota kogukonna tasandil ja kohalike vajaduste katteks . MIKROTOOTMINE ON ENERGIA SÄÄSTUABINÕU! Mikrotootmine – mis ja milleks? • Euroopa Parlament: MIKRO- mikrotootmise laialdasem levik TOOTMISE vähendab kütteostuvõimetuse ja ENERGIAVAESUSE järjest ÜHIKUKULU kasvavat ohtu. • Energiavaesus – kui sissetulekust enam kui 10% kulub energiale • 2013 a. mõjutas Eesti kodumajapidamiste ELEKTRI eluasemekulutusi enim elektri hinna hüppeline tõus HIND TARBIJALE Mikrotootmine Mõiste puudub täna nii kehtivatest seadustest (ElTS), kui reguleerivatest õigusaktidest (Võrgueeskiri). PÄIKE Mikro CHP TUUL + prognoositav ressurss + prognoositav ressurss + sesoonsus kattub keskmise + lihtsalt paigaldatav + sõltuvelt tehnoloogiast võib tarbimiskõveraga + tootmine kattub ettevõtte olla juhitav - prognoosimatu ressurss tarbimiskõveraga - tasuvus sõltub eelkõige - juhitamatu
    [Show full text]
  • Advocating for Renewable Energy in Red States
    01_GUINEY_EDITEDPROOF (DO NOT DELETE) 11/8/2018 2:41 PM The Only Green That Matters Is the Green in Your Pocket: Advocating for Renewable Energy in Red States Noah Guiney* Addressing the threat of climate change will require a large-scale transition from fossil fuel-generated power to renewable energy. However, climate change has been politicized in the United States to such an extent that many states’ lawmakers resist embracing wind and solar power for the simple reason that it is favored by liberals. Fortunately, there are now economic as well as environmental reasons why republican lawmakers should encourage solar and wind sectors in their states. This Note looks at how two traditionally “red” states—Texas and Arizona—have engaged with renewable energy. As this Note shows, Texas embraced wind power because it created jobs, improved reliability and lowered residents’ energy bills. In Arizona, despite the size of the solar industry in the state, solar power remains controversial, in large part because most of the power is exported to California, giving little direct benefit to ordinary Arizonans. The Note concludes by arguing that renewable energy advocates should focus on the economic good that the industry can do in states that are traditionally skeptical of climate change. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 164 I. The Importance of Messaging: The Paris Climate Accord ....................... 165 II. Overview of Renewable Energy .............................................................
    [Show full text]