DOCSLIB.ORG

Indianapolis Power & Light Company

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Indianapolis Power & Light Company Indianapolis Power & Light Company 2016 Integrated Resource Plan Public Version Volume 1 of 3 November 1, 2016 Table of Contents Page Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................. vi Integrated Resource Plan Acronyms .............................................................................................. xi Rule Reference Table ................................................................................................................... xvi Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Section 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. IRP Objective .................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Guiding Principles .......................................................................................................... 2 1.3. IRP Assumptions ............................................................................................................ 2 1.4. IRP Process ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.5. Stakeholder Engagement ................................................................................................ 4 1.6. Existing Customers ......................................................................................................... 5 1.7. Existing Resource Portfolio ............................................................................................ 5 1.7.1. Thermal Resources.................................................................................................. 6 1.7.2. Renewable Resources ............................................................................................. 7 1.7.3. Demand Side Resources ......................................................................................... 8 Section 2: Operating and Planning Within MISO ....................................................................... 9 2.1. Business framework and daily operations ...................................................................... 9 2.1.1. MISO Energy and Operating Reserves Market ...................................................... 9 2.1.2. Transmission Operations ...................................................................................... 10 2.2. Fuel Procurement .......................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1. Fuel Price Forecasting and Methodology ............................................................. 12 2.3. Resource Adequacy ...................................................................................................... 12 2.3.1. Reserve Margin Criteria ........................................................................................ 13 2.3.2. Planning for Resources ......................................................................................... 14 2.3.3. The MISO Capacity Construct.............................................................................. 15 2.3.4. Transmission Planning in MISO ........................................................................... 18 2.4. Transmission Planning Criteria..................................................................................... 18 i 2.4.1. IPL Blackstart Capability ...................................................................................... 21 2.4.2. Assessment Summary ........................................................................................... 22 2.5. Key Results ................................................................................................................... 24 2.6. Transmission Short Term Action Plan .......................................................................... 26 2.7. Transmission Expansion Cost Sharing ......................................................................... 27 2.7.1. Coordinating Transmission and Resource Planning ............................................. 29 Section 3: Distribution & Smart Grid ........................................................................................ 31 3.1. Distribution System Planning ....................................................................................... 31 3.2. Smart Grid Technologies and Opportunities ................................................................ 32 3.2.1. Advanced Metering Systems ................................................................................ 33 3.2.2. Smart Grid Benefits .............................................................................................. 34 3.2.3. Cyber Security and Interoperability Standards ..................................................... 35 3.2.4. Distribution Generation Enabled .......................................................................... 35 3.2.5. Electric Vehicle ..................................................................................................... 36 3.2.6. Future Smart Grid Expectations............................................................................ 37 Section 4: Load Research, Forecast and Load Forecasting Methodology ................................. 38 4.1. Load Research ............................................................................................................... 38 4.2. Forecasting Overview ................................................................................................... 38 4.3. Forecast Methodology .................................................................................................. 42 4.4. Forecasting Challenges ................................................................................................. 45 4.5. Key Forecast Drivers by Sector .................................................................................... 48 4.5.1. Residential............................................................................................................. 49 4.5.2. Small C&I ............................................................................................................. 52 4.5.3. Large C&I ............................................................................................................. 53 4.5.4. Electric Vehicles ................................................................................................... 55 4.6. Load Model Performance and Analysis ........................................................................ 60 Section 5: Resource Options ...................................................................................................... 62 5.1. Existing IPL Resources ................................................................................................. 62 5.1.1. Existing Supply-Side Resources ........................................................................... 62 5.1.2. Existing Demand Side Resources ......................................................................... 66 5.2. United States Resource Trends ..................................................................................... 68 ii 5.2.1. National Resource Mix ......................................................................................... 68 5.2.2. MISO Resource Mix ............................................................................................. 70 5.3. Supply-Side Resource Options ..................................................................................... 73 5.3.1. Natural Gas ........................................................................................................... 76 5.3.2. Nuclear .................................................................................................................. 79 5.3.3. Renewables ........................................................................................................... 80 5.3.4. Energy Storage Resources .................................................................................... 88 5.4. Distributed Generation .................................................................................................. 95 5.5. Demand Side Resource Options ................................................................................... 95 5.5.1. 2017 DSM Resources ........................................................................................... 96 5.5.2. IPL’s DSM Guiding Principles ............................................................................. 97 5.5.3. Indiana Legislation................................................................................................ 97 5.5.4. Federal Regulation ................................................................................................ 99 5.6. DSM as a Selectable Resource ................................................................................... 100 5.6.1. Market Potential .................................................................................................. 101 5.6.2. Market Characterization...................................................................................... 103 5.6.3. Baseline Projections ............................................................................................ 106 5.6.4. Avoided Cost Calculation ..................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Milebymile.Com Personal Road Trip Guide Indiana United States Highway #41
    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide Indiana United States Highway #41 Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Indiana/Kentucky State Indiana/Kentucky State Line, South of Evansville, Indiana, near the Line Bridge over Ohio River, crosses United States Highway #41 into Indiana from Kentucky and starts its northerly journey in Indiana mostly parallel to the Indiana/Illinois. This Highway enters Illinois on the north just north of Hammond, Indiana, ending its long run through Indiana. Altitude: 387 feet 2.7 Washington Ave: Medical Altitude: 381 feet Center 3.2 Lincoln Avenue : Lincoln Avenue, The University of Evansville, a small, private University university located in Evansville, Indiana, The University of Evansville is nationally renowned for its Theatre and Physical Therapy departments, Islamic Center of Evansville, Grace & Peace Lutheran Church, Evansville State Hospital, Indiana Mental Health Center, Altitude: 384 feet 3.5 Interchange State Rte #62 : Altitude: 390 feet Evansville, IN 4.0 Oak Hill St./Virginia St. : Oak Hill Street/Virginia Street, Deaconnes Hospital, a two-campus Park & Zoo healthcare in Evansville, Indiana, Lamasco Park, Helfrich Park, Mesker Music Theater, The Mesker Park Zoo and Botanic Garden, one of the oldest and largest zoos in Indiana, located in Evansville, Indiana, Community of Hilltop, Community of Western Terrace, located in Evansville, Indiana. Altitude: 390 feet 5.3 Interchange State Rte Interchange State Route #66/Diamond Avenue Expressway, to Mesker #66/Diamond Ave Expy : Park, Mesker Zoo located within Helfrich Park in Evansville, Indiana, Mesker Park Garvin Park, Bosse Field, a baseball stadium built in 1915, Stringtown Branch Library, Evansville Country Club, Community of Diamond Stringtown, Community of Willemette, Skylane Airport, an airport located along State Route #66 west off United States Highway #41.
    [Show full text]
  • AES Indiana Organizational Chart & Job Descriptions
    OVERVIEW OF THE AES CORPORATION PARENT OF INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY (DBA AES INDIANA) PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Chief Chief President Human Resources & General Counsel Financial Operating AES US Internal Communications Officer Officer AES Corporation Operating Units Chief Commercial US Utilities Renewable Operating Officer Operations Energy Physical & AES Indiana AES Ohio Cyber Security This is a partial, functional organization chart of the AES Corporation. It is not a corporate entity chart. Additionally there are other groups that are not shown because they are not involved in merchant power functions, transmission operations, or reliability functions in the United States. Revised: June 25, 2021 Lisa Krueger Exec. VP AES US USS Kristina Lund President AES US Utilities USS Aaron Cooper John Arose Mike Shruba Chief Commercial Officer Generation Complex Leader Vice President US Utilities Indiana T&D Operations USS USS David Jackson Michael L. Holtsclaw Roderick Conwell Director Director Director Regulated Operations Transmission & Distributions Transmission & Distribution USS Operations Engineering Note: USS – Employee of US Services, LLC This is a partial organization chart. There are other groups that report to the President and Vice Presidents that are not shown because they are not involved in merchant power functions, transmission operations, or reliability. Revised: June 25, 2021 AES Indiana Executive Vice President AES US – Responsible for overseeing the operation of all regulated and non-regulated activities in the US President, US Utilities – Responsible for overseeing the operations of the US utilities and the support organizations in Indiana and Ohio. Vice President, Indiana T&D Operations – Responsible for directing the operations related to AES Indiana’s transmission and distribution systems Director, T&D Operations – Responsible for operation and maintenance of the AES Indiana transmission and distribution systems and the associated control centers.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission Electric Utility Reliability Report 2020
    INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION ELECTRIC UTILITY RELIABILITY REPORT 2020 Each investor-owned electric utility (IOU) in Indiana is required to file a reliability report annually with the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (IURC or Commission) in compliance with 170 IAC 4-1-23(e). This document serves as a compilation of the reports filed for 2020. This Report includes a graph for each IOU to illustrate the trends in these reliability metrics through 2020 with data starting as early as 2002. The utilities provide the following three reliability indices in their annual reports to the IURC. System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI): This is the average number of interruptions per customer. It is calculated by dividing the total number of customer interruptions by the total number of customers. System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI): SAIDI is the average minutes of interruption per customer. It is calculated by dividing the sum of all customer interruption durations (in minutes) by the total number of customers. Customer Average Interruption Duration Index (CAIDI): CAIDI is the average duration of interruptions or the time to restore service to interrupted customers. It is calculated by dividing SAIDI by SAIFI. Each utility reports its reliability indices with and without major events (Major Event Days or MEDs). Major events are primarily storms or weather events that are more destructive than normal storm patterns. However, major events may also include ice storms, earthquakes, floods, fires, high winds / tornados, and other disasters. Historically, it is important to note that the same definition of “major event” has not been used by all electric utilities, which makes comparisons with some other utilities more difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Registration Document
    2009 REGISTRATION DOCUMENT WorldReginfo - 88364e60-83e1-4e25-beba-ac6c76609afa In this registration document, the terms “EDF Energies Nouvelles” and the “Company” refer to EDF Energies Nouvelles SA. The “Group” refers to the group comprising the Company and all of its subsidiaries. This registration document includes forward-looking statements and information about the objectives of the Group, in particular, relating to its projects in progress. These statements are sometimes identifi ed by the use of the future or conditional tense, as well as terms such as “estimate”, “believe”, “have the objective of”, “intend to”, “expect”, “result in”, “should” and other similar expressions. It should be noted that the realisation of these objectives and forward-looking statements is dependent on the circumstances and facts that arise in the future. The forward-looking statements and information about the objectives may be affected by known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may signifi cantly alter the future results, performance and accomplishments planned or expected by the Company. These factors may include changes in the economic and commercial situation, regulations and the risk factors described in Chapter 4 of the registration document. Investors are invited to read carefully the risk factors included in Chapter 4 of this registration document before making a decision on whether to invest in the Company. The occurrence of one or more of these risks may adversely affect the Group’s business, fi nancial position or results of operations, or on its ability to achieve its objectives. A change in the method used to consolidate wind farms in the United States took place during the fi nancial year ended on 31 December 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • GADS Wind Turbine Generation Data Reporting Instructions
    GGAADDSS WWiinndd TTuurrbbiinnee GGeenneerraattiioonn Data Reporting Instructions Effective January 2010 Version 1.1.0 Table of Contents Table of Contents Section 1 – Introduction ............................................................................................................... 7 Who Must Report .................................................................................................................... 7 Terms, Definitions, and Equations.......................................................................................... 7 Data Release Guidelines ......................................................................................................... 8 Talk to Us ................................................................................................................................ 8 Section 2 – Data Transmittal and Format .................................................................................. 9 Transmittal .............................................................................................................................. 9 Format ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Wind Generation Data Entry Software ................................................................................. 10 Questions and Comments ..................................................................................................... 10 Section 3 – Plants, Groups, and Sub-Groups ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Electric Company Investment and Innovation in Energy Storage Leading the Way U.S
    June 2021 Leading the Way U.S. Electric Company Investment and Innovation in Energy Storage Leading the Way U.S. ELECTRIC COMPANY INVESTMENT AND INNOVATION IN ENERGY STORAGE Table of Contents CASE STUDIES CenterPoint Energy (In alphabetical order by holding company) 14 Solar Plus Storage Project AES Corporation Consolidated Edison Company of New York AES Indiana 15 Commercial Battery Storage 1 Harding Street Station Battery (Beyond Behind-the-Meter) Energy Storage System 16 Gateway Center Mall Battery 17 Ozone Park Battery Alliant Energy Dominion Energy 2 Decorah Energy Storage Project 3 Marshalltown Solar Garden and Storage 18 Bath County Pumped Storage Station 4 Sauk City Microgrid 5 Storage System Solar Demonstration Project DTE Energy 6 Wellman Battery Storage 19 EV Fast Charging-Plus-Storage Pilot Ameren Corporation Duke Energy Ameren Illinois 20 Rock Hill Community 9 MW Battery System 7 Thebes Battery Project 21 Camp Atterbury Microgrid 22 Nabb Battery Site Avangrid New York State Electric & Gas Edison International 8 Aggregated Behind-the-Meter Energy Storage Southern California Edison 9 Distribution Circuit Deployed Battery 23 Alamitos Energy Storage Storage System Pilot Project 24 Ice Bear 25 John S. Eastwood Pumped Storage Plant Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation 26 Mira Loma Substation Battery Storage Project 10 Integrated Electric Vehicle Charging & Battery Storage System Green Mountain Power 11 Peak Shaving Pilot Project 27 Essex Solar and Storage Microgrid 28 Ferrisburgh Solar and Storage Microgrid Berkshire Hathaway Energy 29 Milton Solar and Storage Microgrid MidAmerican Energy Company Hawaiian Electric Companies 12 Knoxville Battery Energy Storage System 30 Schofield Hawaii Public Purpose Microgrid PacifiCorp – Rocky Mountain Power 13 Soleil Lofts Virtual Power Plant i Leading the Way U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 43663 AES in Submission of 2020 Annual Vegetation Management
    STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION INVESTIGATION BY THE INDIANA UTILITY ) REGULATORY COMMISSION, UNDER IC §§ ) 8-1-2-58 AND 59, TO INVESTIGATE ) ELECTRIC UTILITY TREE-TRIMMING ) PRACTICES AND TARIFFS RELATING TO ) SERVICE QUALITY IN THE STATE OF ) CAUSE NO. 43663 INDIANA ) ) RESPONDENTS: ) ALL INDIANA JURISDICTIONAL ) ELECTRIC UTILITIES ) PETITIONER’S SUBMISSION OF ANNUAL VEGETATION MANAGEMENT REPORT Indianapolis Power & Light Company d/b/a AES Indiana (“AES Indiana” or “IPL”), by counsel, hereby submits its Annual Vegetation Management Report as required by the Commission’s November 30, 2010, Order in this Cause. This report also includes outage investigation information showing the number of outages caused by vegetation and the text of 170 IAC 4-9, as agreed to in the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement in IPL’s most recent rate case, Cause No. 45029. Respectfully submitted, Jeffrey M. Peabody, Atty No. 28000-53, on behalf of Teresa Morton Nyhart ________________________________ Teresa Morton Nyhart, Atty No. 14044-49 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP 11 South Meridian Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Telephone: (317) 231-7716 Fax: (317) 231-7433 Email: [email protected] Attorney for INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing Submission of Annual Vegetation Management Report was served by email transmission, upon the following: Randall C. Helmen Charles W. Ritz III Office of Utility Consumer Counselor Parr Richey Obremskey Frandsen & Suite 1500 South Patterson LLP 115 W. Washington Street 225 W. Main Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 P.O. Box 668 Email: [email protected] Lebanon, Indiana 46052 [email protected] Email: [email protected] Kristina Kern Wheeler Randolph G.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download This Report (PDF)
    2009 INDIANA RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES STUDY State Utility Forecasting Group Energy Center Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana David Nderitu Emily Gall Douglas Gotham Forrest Holland Marco Velastegui Paul Preckel September 2009 2009 Indiana Renewable Energy Resources Study - State Utility Forecasting Group Table of Contents Page List of Figures iii List of Tables v Acronyms and Abbreviations vi Foreword ix 1. Overview 1 1.1 Trends in renewable energy consumption in the United States 1 1.2 Trends in renewable energy consumption in Indiana 4 1.3 References 8 2. Energy from Wind 9 2.1 Introduction 9 2.2 Economics of wind energy 11 2.3 State of wind energy nationally 14 2.4 Wind energy in Indiana 18 2.5 Incentives for wind energy 24 2.6 References 26 3. Dedicated Energy Crops 27 3.1 Introduction 27 3.2 Economics of energy crops 30 3.3 State of energy crops nationally 32 3.4 Energy crops in Indiana 36 3.5 Incentives for energy crops 38 3.6 References 40 4. Organic Waste Biomass 43 4.1 Introduction 43 4.2 Economics of organic waste biomass 46 4.3 State of organic waste biomass nationally 47 4.4 Organic waste biomass in Indiana 49 4.5 Incentives for organic waste biomass 53 4.6 References 54 i 2009 Indiana Renewable Energy Resources Study - State Utility Forecasting Group 5. Solar Energy 57 5.1 Introduction 57 5.2 Economics of solar technologies 60 5.3 State of solar energy nationally 60 5.4 Solar energy in Indiana 66 5.5 Incentives for solar energy 66 5.6 References 69 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Reg Flex Cover.Indd
    Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission Regulatory Flexibility Report to the Indiana General Assembly '08 Tradition. Innovation. Change. Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (Commission) is pleased to present its 2008 Report to the Regulatory Flexibility Committee of the Indiana General Assembly. This Report highlights key issues that confront Indiana Electric, Natural Gas, Communications and Water/Wastewater utility industries and discusses the role of the Commission in managing these issues. Over the course of the last year, many topics have been addressed including: energy efficiency, aging infrastructure, the rising cost of energy, access to broadband and economic development. The Commission has been monitoring statewide and national efforts to address these issues in addition to remaining at the forefront of discussion with legislators, other state regulators and commissions. The Report broaches many of these topics and provides updates on how they affect Indiana. While each industry has unique concerns, several discussed in this Report are common to more than one type of industry. This Executive Summary contains a brief overview of these cross-industry and industry-specific issues, which are more fully addressed in the body of the Report. By examining cross-industry concerns, certain trends emerge along with areas that may need more attention. Plus, they demonstrate how similar utilities are with regard to regulation and support. The Report contains, as an appendix, a copy of the External Client Survey undertaken by the Commission in 2007. Even though the results of the Survey were very positive, the Commission provided a response that addressed the issues identified in the Survey and continues to explore and undertake efforts to enhance overall performance.
    [Show full text]
  • October 9, 2018 INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
    STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION VERIFIED PETITION OF NORTHERN ) INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC ) FOR (1) APPROVAL OF AN ADJUSTMENT ) TO ITS ELECTRIC SERVICE RATES ) THROUGH ITS TRANSMISSION, ) DISTRIBUTION, AND STORAGE SYSTEM ) IMPROVEMENT CHARGE (“TDSIC”) RATE ) SCHEDULE; (2) AUTHORITY TO DEFER 20% ) CAUSE NO. 44733‐TDSIC‐4 OF THE APPROVED CAPITAL ) EXPENDITURES AND TDSIC COSTS FOR ) RECOVERY IN PETITIONER’S NEXT ) GENERAL RATE CASE; (3) APPROVAL OF ) PETITIONER’S UPDATED 7‐YEAR ) ELECTRIC PLAN, INCLUDING ACTUAL ) AND PROPOSED ESTIMATED CAPITAL ) EXPENDITURES AND TDSIC COSTS THAT ) EXCEED THE APPROVED AMOUNTS IN ) CAUSE NO. 44733‐TDSIC‐3, ALL PURSUANT ) TO IND. CODE § 8‐1‐39‐9; AND (4) ) APPROVAL OF PETITIONER’S RETURN OF ) EXCESS INCOME TAX REVENUE ) RECOVERED THROUGH ITS BASE RATES ) BETWEEN JANUARY 1 AND APRIL 30, 2018 ) THROUGH ITS TDSIC FACTOR. ) PETITIONER’S NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF WITNESS Northern Indiana Public Service Company LLC, by counsel, hereby gives notice that Charles A. Vamos is being substituted for and is adopting the direct testimony and attachments previously prefiled by James E. Zucal. For purposes of convenience, attached hereto are (1) a redline version of the Introduction section of Mr. Vamos’ direct testimony showing the changes from the previously prefiled version of Mr. Zucal’s direct testimony, and (2) a clean copy of Mr. Vamos’ direct testimony. At the evidentiary hearing in this Cause, the clean version of Mr. Vamos’ direct testimony (along with the attachments) will be offered
    [Show full text]
  • State Utility Forecasting Group | Energy Center at Discovery Park | Purdue University | West Lafayette, Indiana
    October 2017 State Utility Forecasting Group | Energy Center at Discovery Park | Purdue University | West Lafayette, Indiana 2017 INDIANA RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES STUDY State Utility Forecasting Group Energy Center Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana David Nderitu Douglas Gotham Liwei Lu Darla Mize Tim Phillips Paul Preckel Marco Velastegui Fang Wu October 2017 Table of Contents List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... iii List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. v Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................. vii Foreword……………………………… ………………………………………………. ....... .xi 1. Overview ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Trends in renewable energy consumption in the United States ....................... 1 1.2 Trends in renewable energy consumption in Indiana ...................................... 4 1.3 Cost of renewable resources .......................................................................... 10 1.4 References ...................................................................................................... 12 2. Energy from Wind ........................................................................................................ 13 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor's
    STATE OF INDIANA INDIANA UTILITY REGULATORY COMMISSION VERIFIED JOINT PETITION OF DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, ) LLC, INDIANA GAS COMPANY D/B/A VECTREN ENERGY ) DELIVERY OF INDIANA, INC., INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER ) COMPANY, INDIANA NATURAL GAS CORPORATION, ) INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, MIDWEST ) NATURAL GAS CORPORATION, NORTHERN INDIANA ) PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, LLC, OHIO VALLEY GAS ) CORP. AND OHIO VALLEY GAS, INC., SOUTHERN INDIANA ) GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY D/B/A VECTREN ENERGY ) DELIVERY OF INDIANA, INC., AND SYCAMORE GAS ) CAUSE NO. 45377 COMPANY FOR (1) AUTHORITY FOR ALL JOINT ) (Consolidated under PETITIONERS TO DEFER AS A REGULATORY ASSET ) Cause No. 45380) CERTAIN INCREMENTAL EXPENSE INCREASES AND ) REVENUE REDUCTIONS OF THE UTILITY ATTRIBUTABLE ) TO COVID-19; AND (2) THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ) SUBDOCKETS FOR EACH JOINT PETITIONER IN WHICH ) EACH JOINT PETITIONER MAY ADDRESS REPAYMENT ) PROGRAMS FOR PAST DUE CUSTOMER ACCOUNTS, ) APPROVAL OF NEW BAD DEBT TRACKERS, AND/OR ) DETAILS CONCERNING THE FUTURE RECOVERY OF THE COVID-19 REGULATORY ASSET PETITION OF INDIANA OFFICE OF UTILITY CONSUMER ) COUNSELOR FOR GENERIC INVESTIGATION INTO COVID- ) 19 IMPACTS TO BE CONDUCTED OVER TWO PHASES; ) EMERGENCY RELIEF PURSUANT TO IND. CODE § 8-1-2-113 ) CAUSE NO. 45380 TO RELIEVE INDIANA RATEPAYERS OF THE THREAT OF ) UTILITY SERVICE DISCONNECTION AND PAYMENT ) ARREARAGES DURING GLOBAL HEALTH AND ECONOMIC ) CRISIS ) INDIANA OFFICE OF UTILITY CONSUMER COUNSELOR’S NOTICE PURSUANT TO JULY 7, 2021, DOCKET ENTRY The Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor (“OUCC”), by counsel, hereby files its Notice in response to the Presiding Officers’ July 7, 2021, Docket Entry (the “Docket Entry”) in this Cause. In pertinent part, the Docket Entry states: To the extent any party believes there are COVID-19 related issues that remain to be determined in Phase 2, the party shall file, on or before July 26, 2021, a notice 1 under this consolidated Cause identifying and explaining the issue(s) it believes remains to be addressed in Phase 2.
    [Show full text]