DOCSLIB.ORG

EEI U.S. Member Company Service Territories

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EEI U.S. Member Company Service Territories EEI U.S. Member Company Service Territories Puget Sound Otter Tail Power Superior WWaateter, Light, and Power Energy Upper Michigan Energy Resources Upper Peninsula Power Company Avista Utilities NorthWestern Energy We Energies Xcel Energy Montana-Dakota Utilities Minnesota Power Portland General Green Mountain Power Electric Idaho Power NorthWestern Energy Consumers Penn Power National Central Maine Power Energy Duquesne Light Grid Company Alliant MGE DTE Energy RG&E Liberty UtilitieUtilitiess UnitiUnitill Eversource Energy Pacific Power Rocky Mountain Power MidAmerican Energy ComEd IMP NYSEG CHG&E TolEd IC West Penn Black Hills Energy Power UGI UI NIPSCO Ohio Edison PPL PSEG Long Island AES Ohio Penelec Liberty NV Energy PECO Utilities Ameren Illinois AES Ohio Potomac AES Indiana Edison Orange and Rockland Duke Energy Mon Power ConEd Evergy Ameren Missouri LG&E and KU Public Service Electric and Gas Co. Jersey Central Power & Light CenterPoint Energy Appalachian Liberty Utilities Kentucky Power Company Atlantic City Electric Power Dominion Energy Met-Ed PG&E Xcel Energy Oklahoma Gas & BGE Electric Company Mt. Carmel Public PEPCO Delmarva Power Utility Co. UniSource PNM PSO Entergy Duke Energy Arkansas Southern Arizona Public Entergy California Edison Service Co. Mississippi SWEPCO Alabama Georgia Dominion Energy Power Power Member Companies with No Service Territory San Diego Gas El Paso Oncor Electric Ohio Valley Electric Corporation & Electric Cleco Mississippi Tennessee Valley Authority (EEI Strategic Partner) Tucson Electric Power TNMP Sharyland Entergy FPU Transmission-Only Utilities Power Utilities Texas Gulf Power American Transmission Company Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota and Illinois CenterPoint Energy Entergy Duke Energy ITC Holdings Corp. Michigan, Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Missouri and Kansas Louisiana Alaska Hawaii Sharyland Utilities Texas Vermont Electric Power Company Vermont AEP Texas Entergy New Orleans Tampa Electric Hawaiian Electric Co.Co. Map Abbreviation Key Alaska Electric CHG&E = Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. NIPSCO = Northern Indiana Public Service Company Florida Power & Light ConEd = Consolidated Edison Company of New York Light and Power Co. PG&E = Pacific Gas and Electric Company DP&L = Dayton Power & Light Company PPL = PPL Electric Utilities Corporation FPU = Florida Public Utilities PSO = Public Service Company of Oklahoma IC = The Illuminating Company RG&E = Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation IMP = Indiana Michigan Power SCE&G = South Carolina Electric & Gas MGE = Madison Gas and Electric Company SWEPCO = Southwestern Electric Power Company NYSEG = New York State Electric & Gas Corporation TolEd = Toledo Edison UI = The United Illuminating Company WPS = Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Produced by Edison Electric Institute. Data Source: ABB, Velocity Suite. June 2021 EEI Member Lookup By Operating Company AEP Ohio ...................................................... American Electric Power Entergy Texas. .............................................. Entergy Corporation Ohio Edison ................................................... FirstEnergy Unitil Corporation .......................................... No Parent AEP Texas ..................................................... American Electric Power Eversource Energy ....................................... No Parent Ohio Valley Electric Corporation .................. No Parent Upper Michigan Energy Resources .............. WEC Energy Group AES Indiana .................................................. AES Corporation Florida Power & Light Company ................... NextEra Energy Oncor ............................................................ Sempra Energy Upper Peninsula Power Company ................ No Parent AES Ohio ...................................................... AES Corporation Florida Public Utilities ................................... Chesapeake Utilities Orange and Rockland Utilities ...................... Consolidated Edison Vermont Electric Power Company ................ No Parent Alabama Power Company ............................ Southern Company Corporation Otter Tail Power Company ............................ Otter Tail Corporation We Energies .................................................. WEC Energy Group Alaska Electric Light and Power Company .. Avista Corporation Georgia Power Company .............................. Southern Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company ............... PG&E Corporation West Penn Power ......................................... FirstEnergy Alliant Energy ................................................ No Parent Green Mountain Power ................................. Énergir+ Pacific Power ................................................ PacifiCorp Wisconsin Public Service ............................. WEC Energy Group Ameren Illinois .............................................. Ameren Corporation Gulf Power Company .................................... NextEra Energy PacifiCorp ..................................................... Berkshire Hathaway Energy Xcel Energy ................................................... No Parent Ameren Missouri ........................................... Ameren Corporation Hawaiian Electric Company .......................... Hawaiian Electric Industries PECO ............................................................ Exelon Corporation American Transmission Company ................ No Parent Idaho Power .................................................. IDACORP Penelec ......................................................... FirstEnergy Appalachian Power Company ...................... American Electric Power The Illuminating Company ............................ FirstEnergy Penn Power ................................................... FirstEnergy Arizona Public Service Company ................. Pinnacle West Capital Indiana Michigan Power Company ............... American Electric Power Pepco ............................................................ Exelon Corporation Corporation ITC Great Plains ............................................ ITC Holdings Corp. PNM .............................................................. PNM Resources Atlantic City Electric ...................................... Exelon Corporation ITC Michigan ................................................. ITC Holdings Corp. Portland General Electric ............................. No Parent Avista Utilities ................................................ Avista Corporation ITC Midwest .................................................. ITC Holdings Corp. Potomac Edison ............................................ FirstEnergy BGE ............................................................... Exelon Corporation Jersey Central Power & Light ....................... FirstEnergy PPL Electric Utilities ...................................... PPL Corporation Black Hills Energy ......................................... Black Hills Corporation Kentucky Power Company ............................ American Electric Power PSEG Long Island ......................................... Public Service Enterprise Group CenterPoint Energy ....................................... No Parent LG&E KU Energy .......................................... PPL Corporation Public Service Company of Oklahoma ......... American Electric Power Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp ............ Fortis* Liberty Utilities .............................................. Algonquin Power & Utilities Public Service Electric and Gas Company ... Public Service Enterprise Group Central Maine Power .................................... AVANGRID Corporation+ Puget Sound Energy ..................................... No Parent Cleco Corporate Holdings ............................ No Parent Madison Gas and Electric ............................. MGE Energy Rochester Gas and Electric .......................... AVANGRID ComEd .......................................................... Exelon Corporation Met-Ed ........................................................... FirstEnergy Rocky Mountain Power ................................. PacifiCorp Consolidated Edison Company MidAmerican Energy Company .................... Berkshire Hathaway Energy San Diego Gas & Electric ............................. Sempra Energy of New York ............................................... Consolidated Edison Minnesota Power .......................................... ALLETE Sharyland Utilities ......................................... No Parent Consumers Energy ....................................... CMS Energy Corporation Mississippi Power Company ......................... Southern Company Southern California Edison ........................... Edison International Delmarva Power ........................................... Exelon Corporation Mon Power .................................................... FirstEnergy Southwestern Electric Power Company ....... American Electric Power Dominion Energy .......................................... No Parent Montana-Dakota Utilities Company .............. MDU Resources Group Superior Water, Light, and Power Company ALLETE DTE Energy ................................................... No Parent Mt. Carmel Public Utility Company ............... No Parent Tampa Electric, an Emera Company ............ Emera* Duke Energy.................................................. No Parent National Grid ................................................ No Parent Tennessee Valley Authorityo ........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fact Book 2020
    2020 AEP FACT BOOK 55th EEI Financial Conference November 9-10, 2020 “Safe Harbor” Statement Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Although AEP and each of its Registrant Subsidiaries believe that their expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such statements may be influenced by factors that could cause actual outcomes and results to be materially different from those projected. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are: changes in economic conditions, electric market demand and demographic patterns in AEP service territories, The impact of pandemics, including COVID-19, and any associated disruption of AEP’s business operations due to impacts on economic or market conditions, electricity usage, employees, customers, service providers, vendors and suppliers, inflationary or deflationary interest rate trends, volatility in the financial markets, particularly developments affecting the availability or cost of capital to finance new capital projects and refinance existing debt, the availability and cost of funds to finance working capital and capital needs, particularly during periods when the time lag between incurring costs and recovery is long and the costs are material, decreased demand for electricity, weather conditions, including storms and drought conditions, and the ability to recover significant
    [Show full text]
  • Case No. Pur-2020-00074
    200430141 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION AT RICHMOND, APRIL 29, 2020 Document Control Center 04/29/[email protected] PM COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ex rel. STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION CASE NO. PUR-2020-00074 Ex Parte: Authority to create regulatory asset ORDER On April 21, 2020, the following public utilities filed a letter request ("Letter") with the Clerk of the State Corporation Commission ("Commission"): Washington Gas Light Company; Columbia Gas of Virginia, Inc.; Roanoke Gas Company; Virginia Natural Gas, Inc.; Atmos Energy Corporation; Appalachian Natural Gas Distribution Company; Southwestern Virginia Gas Company; Aqua Virginia, Inc.; and Virginia-American Water Company. The Letter seeks the Commission's approval "to create a [r]egulatory [a]ssetto record incremental prudently incurred costs and suspended late payment fees attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic."1 The Letter notes that the Commission has issued orders2 taking judicial notice of the ongoing public health emergency related to the spread of the coronavirus, or COVID-19, and the 1 Letter at 1. On April 27, 2020, Massanutten Public Service Corporation filed comments supporting the Letter and asking for the same relief. 2 See, e.g., Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. State Corporation Commission, Ex Parte: Electronic Service of Commission Orders, Case No. CLK-2020-00004, Doc. Con. Cen. No. 200330035, Order Concerning Electronic Service of Commission Orders (Mar. 19, 2020); Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. State Corporation Commission, Ex Parte: Revised Operating Procedures During COVID-19 Emergency, Case No. CLK-2020-00005, Doc. Con. Cen. No. 200330042, Order Regarding the State Corporation Commission's Revised Operating Procedures During COVID-19 Emergency (Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Center West Mcfadden Property Dubuque, Iowa Available Acres: 103
    Industrial Center West McFadden Property Dubuque, Iowa Available acres: 103 Property and area The Industrial Center West McFadden Property contains 103 buildable acres and resides in Dubuque, Iowa. The property is conveniently located one mile from four-lane U.S. Highway 20 connecting to U.S. Interstate 35. It is also linked to U.S. Interstates 80 and 90 via four-lane U.S. Highway 61 and Interstates 39 and 94 (Madison, Wisconsin) via four-lane U.S. Highway 151. The site is certified through the State of Iowa Certified Site Program which is administered by McCallum Sweeney Consulting and the BNSF railroad programs. The Greater Dubuque area is in the heart of the Midwest, a convenient distance from major urban areas and large consumer markets; 66.8 million people live within 500 miles. Vast transit and shipping options make it easy to get products to market, including four-lane connections, rail service, local and regional commercial airports, and Mississippi River barge harbor service. Site details Utilities Available acres: 103 Site certification: Iowa Site Electric: Alliant Energy Certification Program (McCallum Topography: Rolling hills Gas: Black Hills Energy (total elevation changes across site: Sweeney Consulting) Telecommunications: CenturyLink - Buried 795’ - 915’) Adjacent available acres: No fiber-optics and copper on the north and south Zoning: Heavy industrial Setting: Single site borders of the property Within city limits: Yes Sewer distribution: City of Dubuque Transportation Water distribution: City of Dubuque Nearest interstate: Interstate 80 (65 miles) Nearest four-lane highway: U.S. Highway 20 (1 mile) Nearest commercial airport: Dubuque Regional Airport (12 miles) Rail served: No INDUSTRIAL CENTER WEST MCFADDEN PROPERTY Chavenelle Road Dubuque, Iowa 52002 OFFERING Sale price: $120,000 per acre ($60,000 per acre if company creates a minimum of 10 new jobs) CONTACT Mark Seckman | Senior Economic Development Manager (319) 786-4392 office | (319) 270-5081 (cell) [email protected] Alliant Energy 200 1st St.
    [Show full text]
  • Merchants and the Origins of Capitalism
    Merchants and the Origins of Capitalism Sophus A. Reinert Robert Fredona Working Paper 18-021 Merchants and the Origins of Capitalism Sophus A. Reinert Harvard Business School Robert Fredona Harvard Business School Working Paper 18-021 Copyright © 2017 by Sophus A. Reinert and Robert Fredona Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Merchants and the Origins of Capitalism Sophus A. Reinert and Robert Fredona ABSTRACT: N.S.B. Gras, the father of Business History in the United States, argued that the era of mercantile capitalism was defined by the figure of the “sedentary merchant,” who managed his business from home, using correspondence and intermediaries, in contrast to the earlier “traveling merchant,” who accompanied his own goods to trade fairs. Taking this concept as its point of departure, this essay focuses on the predominantly Italian merchants who controlled the long‐distance East‐West trade of the Mediterranean during the Middle Ages and Renaissance. Until the opening of the Atlantic trade, the Mediterranean was Europe’s most important commercial zone and its trade enriched European civilization and its merchants developed the most important premodern mercantile innovations, from maritime insurance contracts and partnership agreements to the bill of exchange and double‐entry bookkeeping. Emerging from literate and numerate cultures, these merchants left behind an abundance of records that allows us to understand how their companies, especially the largest of them, were organized and managed.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Electrification at Epri August 2018 Newsletter
    EFFICIENT ELECTRIFICATION AT EPRI AUGUST 2018 NEWSLETTER Efficient electrification is about innovation. It’s about creative solutions that benefit a broad range of stakeholders–utility customers, utilities, private industry, and society. This issue of Efficient Electrification highlights a few of the many innovative solutions that industry leaders are proposing: • To help customers learn about the benefits of using electricity and make more informed energy choices, American Electric Power (AEP) recently launched its Energy Conversion Hub. • To facilitate coordinated planning among energy and water utilities, the Water Resource Foundation is pioneering an innovative approach using a competitive tournament. • EPRI is demonstrating an innovative, low-cost solution to end-use monitoring and control called the energy management circuit breaker. • In its Electrification Futures Study, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) examines how potential electrification could transform the U.S. energy system. Learn about the key findings of the most recent report. • Global experts from utilities, private industry, regulators, EPRI, and others will cover many “big ideas” planned for the Electrification 2018 Conference plenary sessions. You will hear much more about innovative solutions in the many keynote talks, technical sessions, and exhibits at the upcoming Electrification 2018 International Conference & Exposition, August 20–23, 2018, in Long Beach, California. Remember to check out the list of recent news, events, and EPRI resources at the
    [Show full text]
  • New Strategies for Utility Growth
    New Strategies for Utility Growth As electricity use levels off, utility executives will need to explore new ways to meet investor growth expectations. By Grant Dougans and Joe Scalise Grant Dougans is a partner in Bain’s Utilities practice, and Joe Scalise leads the practice globally. Joe also leads the fi rm’s Energy & Natural Resources practice in the Americas. Copyright © 2019 Bain & Company, Inc. All rights reserved. New Strategies for Utility Growth At a Glance Investors remain confident in the regulated utility model, and most expect earnings growth of at least 6% annually—a daunting challenge given that electricity load growth is nearly flat for many utilities. In the core regulated utility business, every function has a role to play in supporting growth at a time of increasing competitive pressure and heightened scrutiny from regulators and stakeholders. Winners will use M&A to access new capital investment opportunities, build scale and realize cost savings. Some executive teams will develop second engines of growth outside of the regulated utility, in adjacencies that make use of their engineering and infrastructure expertise. Several utilities are exploring investments in new energy technologies, though success is far from guaranteed. Investors expect utilities to grow the size of their businesses by 70% over the next decade in the face of flat electric load growth. That is the stark message from new research by Bain & Company and Rivel Research Group, surveying utilities investors in North America. Our survey confirms investors’ extraordinary faith in the traditional regulated utility model(see Figure 1). Nearly three quarters of investors have a positive outlook on the sector, and more than 80% believe that the vertically integrated utility model remains sustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoreline Management Program
    SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MARTIN DAM PROJECT FERC NO. 349 Prepared by: Birmingham, Alabama December 2016 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MARTIN DAM PROJECT ALABAMA POWER COMPANY BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................... 1-3 2.0 PURPOSE AND GOALS OF THE SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ....... 2-1 3.0 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT POLICIES ................................................................... 3-1 3.1 SHORELINE CONSERVATION POLICY ..................................................................... 3-1 3.2 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT POLICIES .................................................................... 3-2 4.0 SHORELINE MANAGEMENT CLASSIFICATIONS .................................................. 4-1 4.1 SHORELINE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM ................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 PROJECT OPERATIONS ............................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 RECREATION ............................................................................................. 4-1 4.1.3 QUASI-PUBLIC LANDS .............................................................................. 4-2 4.1.4 COMMERCIAL RECREATION ...................................................................... 4-2 4.1.5 NATURAL/UNDEVELOPED ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 489.108 Name. 1. the Name of a Limited Liability Company Must Contain the Words “Limited Liability Company” Or “Limited Company” Or the Abbreviation “L
    1 REVISED UNIFORM LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ACT, §489.108 489.108 Name. 1. The name of a limited liability company must contain the words “limited liability company” or “limited company” or the abbreviation “L. L. C.”, “LLC”, “L. C.”, or “LC”. “Limited” may be abbreviated as “Ltd.”, and “company” may be abbreviated as “Co.”. 2. Unless authorized by subsection 3, the name of a limited liability company must be distinguishable in the records of the secretary of state from all of the following: a. The name of each person that is not an individual and that is incorporated, organized, or authorized to transact business in this state. b. Each name reserved under section 489.109. 3. A limited liability company may apply to the secretary of state for authorization to use a name that does not comply with subsection 2. The secretary of state shall authorize use of the name applied for if either of the following applies: a. The present user, registrant, or owner of the noncomplying name consents in a signed record to the use and submits an undertaking in a form satisfactory to the secretary of state to change the noncomplying name to a name that complies with subsection 2 and is distinguishable in the records of the secretary of state from the name applied for. b. The applicant delivers to the secretary of state a certified copy of the final judgment of a court establishing the applicant’s right to use in this state the name applied for. 4. A limited liability company may use the name, including the fictitious name, of another entity that is used in this state if the other entity is formed under the law of this state or is authorized to transact business in this state and the proposed user limited liability company meets any of the following conditions: a.
    [Show full text]
  • Partner Resumes
    John L. Gronski Major General, USA (Ret.) [email protected] 610-463-5492 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE • Served for over 40 years in the United States Army on active duty and in the Pennsylvania National Guard retiring at the rank of Major General. Currently a Senior Mentor – Highly Qualified Expert for the U.S. Army Mission Command Training Program, an adjunct fellow with the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA), president of Leader Grove Consulting, LLC, and an independent national security analyst focusing on transatlantic issues. Holds a top secret security clearance. • Key military operational leadership experience includes from 2016 to 2019 served on active duty as United States Army Europe, Deputy Commanding General, Army National Guard assisting the Commanding General in leading over 30,000 Soldiers. Commanded the 28th Infantry Division, leading 15,000 Soldiers from 2012 to 2016. Deployed to Ramadi, Iraq in 2005 and 2006 as a brigade commander leading a force of over 5,400 U.S. service members and 5,000 Iraqi Soldiers during combat operations. Deployed to the central region of Europe between 2002 and 2003 as a brigade commander leading a force of approximately 2,000 Soldiers. In 2000 was assigned for one year as the Military Liaison Team Chief in the Republic of Lithuania. Commanded National Guard infantry units at every level from company to division. • In the civilian sector, led diverse teams as a management consultant for over 13 years. Provided oversight and leadership to implementation teams responsible for planning and executing large complex projects in Fortune 500 companies. Served as an executive coach for senior business leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Enron's Pawns
    Enron’s Pawns How Public Institutions Bankrolled Enron’s Globalization Game byJim Vallette and Daphne Wysham Sustainable Energy and Economy Network Institute for Policy Studies March 22, 2002 About SEEN The Sustainable Energy and Economy Network, a project of the Institute for Policy Studies (Washington, DC), works in partnership with citizens groups nationally and globally on environment, human rights and development issues with a particular focus on energy, climate change, environmental justice, and economic issues, particularly as these play out in North/South relations. SEEN views these issues as inextricably linked to global security, and therefore applies a human security paradigm as a framework for guiding its work. The reliance of rich countries on fossil fuels fosters a climate of insecurity, and a rationale for large military budgets in the North. In the South, it often fosters or nurtures autocratic or dictatorial regimes and corruption, while exacerbating poverty and destroying subsistence cultures and sustainable livelihoods. A continued rapid consumption of fossil fuels also ensures catastrophic environmental consequences: Climate change is a serious, emerging threat to the stability of the planet's ecosystems, and a particular hazard to the world's poorest peo- ple. The threat of climate change also brings more urgency to the need to reorient energy-related investments, using them to provide abundant, clean, safe energy for human needs and sustainable livelihoods. SEEN views energy not as an issue that can be examined in isolation, but rather as a vital resource embedded in a development strategy that must simultaneously address other fundamentals, such as education, health care, public par- ticipation in decision-making, and economic opportunities for the poorest.
    [Show full text]
  • AES Indiana Organizational Chart & Job Descriptions
    OVERVIEW OF THE AES CORPORATION PARENT OF INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY (DBA AES INDIANA) PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Chief Chief President Human Resources & General Counsel Financial Operating AES US Internal Communications Officer Officer AES Corporation Operating Units Chief Commercial US Utilities Renewable Operating Officer Operations Energy Physical & AES Indiana AES Ohio Cyber Security This is a partial, functional organization chart of the AES Corporation. It is not a corporate entity chart. Additionally there are other groups that are not shown because they are not involved in merchant power functions, transmission operations, or reliability functions in the United States. Revised: June 25, 2021 Lisa Krueger Exec. VP AES US USS Kristina Lund President AES US Utilities USS Aaron Cooper John Arose Mike Shruba Chief Commercial Officer Generation Complex Leader Vice President US Utilities Indiana T&D Operations USS USS David Jackson Michael L. Holtsclaw Roderick Conwell Director Director Director Regulated Operations Transmission & Distributions Transmission & Distribution USS Operations Engineering Note: USS – Employee of US Services, LLC This is a partial organization chart. There are other groups that report to the President and Vice Presidents that are not shown because they are not involved in merchant power functions, transmission operations, or reliability. Revised: June 25, 2021 AES Indiana Executive Vice President AES US – Responsible for overseeing the operation of all regulated and non-regulated activities in the US President, US Utilities – Responsible for overseeing the operations of the US utilities and the support organizations in Indiana and Ohio. Vice President, Indiana T&D Operations – Responsible for directing the operations related to AES Indiana’s transmission and distribution systems Director, T&D Operations – Responsible for operation and maintenance of the AES Indiana transmission and distribution systems and the associated control centers.
    [Show full text]
  • FORM 10-K (Mark One)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission Registrant; State of Incorporation; I.R.S. Employer File Number Address; and Telephone Number Identification No. 333-21011 FIRSTENERGY CORP. 34-1843785 (An Ohio Corporation) 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 000-53742 FIRSTENERGY SOLUTIONS CORP. 31-1560186 (An Ohio Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp. 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 1-2578 OHIO EDISON COMPANY 34-0437786 (An Ohio Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp. 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 1-2323 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY 34-0150020 (An Ohio Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp. 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 1-3583 THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY 34-4375005 (An Ohio Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp. 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 1-3141 JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 21-0485010 (A New Jersey Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp. 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 1-446 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY 23-0870160 (A Pennsylvania Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp. 76 South Main Street Akron, OH 44308 Telephone (800)736-3402 1-3522 PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY 25-0718085 (A Pennsylvania Corporation) c/o FirstEnergy Corp.
    [Show full text]