DOCSLIB.ORG

CNS 2013 Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CNS 2013 Program Cognitive Neuroscience Society 20th Annual Meeting, April 13-16, 2013 Hyatt Regency Hotel, San Francisco, California 2013 Annual Meeting Program Contents 2013 Committees & Staff . 2 Schedule Overview . 3 Keynotes. 5 George A. Miller Prize. 7 Distinguished Career Contributions Award . 8 Young Investigator Award . 9 General Information. 12 Exhibitors . 15 Invited-Symposium Sessions. 16 Mini-Symposium Sessions . 23 Poster Schedule . 31 Poster Session A . 32 Poster Session B . 62 Poster Session C . 92 Poster Session D . 121 Poster Session E . 151 Poster Session F . 180 Poster Session G . 209 Poster Session H . 238 Poster Topic Index . 267 Author Index . 269 Hyatt Regency Floorplan . 280 A Supplement of the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Cognitive Neuroscience Society c/o Center for the Mind and Brain 267 Cousteau Place, Davis, CA 95616 ISSN 1096-8857 © CNS www.cogneurosociety.org 2013 Committees & Staff Governing Board Mini-Symposium Committee Roberto Cabeza, Ph.D., Duke University Elizabeth Kensinger, Ph.D., Boston College (Chair) Marta Kutas, Ph.D., University of California, San Diego David Badre, Ph.D., Brown University Helen Neville, Ph.D., University of Oregon Clayton Curtis, Ph.D., New York University Daniel Schacter, Ph.D., Harvard University Lila Davachi, Ph.D., New York University Michael S. Gazzaniga, Ph.D.,University of California, Scott Huettel, Ph.D., Duke University Santa Barbara (ex offi cio) Gina Kuperberg, Ph.D., Harvard University George R. Mangun, Ph.D., University of California, Kia Nobre, Ph.D., University of Oxford Davis (ex offi cio) Thad Polk, Ph.D., University of Michigan Patti Reuter-Lorenz, Ph.D., University of Michigan (ex offi cio) Marty Woldorff, Ph.D., Duke University Program Committee Young Investigator Award Committee George R. Mangun, Ph.D., University of California, Charan Ranganath, Ph.D., University of California, Davis (Chair) Davis (Chair) Marie Banich, Ph.D., University of Colorado Sabine Kastner, Ph.D., Princeton University Roberto Cabeza, Ph.D., Duke University Kevin LaBar, Ph.D., Duke University Manuel Carreiras, Ph.D., Basque Center on Cog- Eleanor Maguire, Ph.D., University College London nition, Brain and Language, Spain Cathy Price, Ph.D., University College, London Alan Kingstone, Ph.D., University of British Columbia Founding Committee (1994) Ken Paller, Ph.D., Northwestern University Michael S. Gazzaniga, Ph.D., University of California, Brad Postle, Ph.D., University of Wisconsin-Madison Santa Barbara Patti Reuter-Lorenz, Ph.D., University of Michigan George R. Mangun, Ph.D., University of California, Davis Poster Committee Steve Pinker, Ph.D., Harvard University Tobias Egner, Ph.D., Duke University (Chair) Patti Reuter-Lorenz, Ph.D., University of Michigan Xu Cui, Ph.D., Stanford University Daniel Schacter, Ph.D., Harvard University Nadine Gaab, Ph.D., Harvard Medical School Art Shimamura, Ph.D., University of California, Berkeley Brian Gonsalves, Ph.D., University of Illinois, Administrative Staff Urbana-Champaign Kate Tretheway, Executive Director Hauke Heekeren, Ph.D., Freie Universität Berlin Sangay Wangmo, Administrative Assistant Fumiko Hoeft, Ph.D., University of California, San Francisco TM Events, Inc. Meeting Staff Matthew Jerram, Ph.D., Suffolk University Tara Miller, Event Director Irene Kan, Ph.D., Villanova University Kerry Bosch, Staff & Volunteer Manager Dante Picchioni, Walter Reed Army Institute for Research Joan Carole, Exhibits Manager Jelena Ristic, Ph.D., McGill University Shawna Lampkin, Event Associate Rebecca Spencer, Ph.D., University of Massachusetts- Amherst Renee Smith, Registration Manager Shauney Wilson, Submissions Manager Jeff Wilson, Website & Program Manager 2 Cognitive Neuroscience Society Schedule Overview Saturday, April 13 11:00 am – 3:00 pm Exhibitor Check-In, Exhibit Hall 11:00 am – 6:30 pm Onsite Registration & Pre-Registration Check-In, Grand Ballroom Foyer 3:30 – 6:30 pm Exhibits on Display, Exhibit Hall 3:30 – 6:30 pm Poster Session A, Exhibit Hall 4:30 – 5:30 pm Opening Ceremonies & 19th Annual George A. Miller Prize in Cognitive Neuroscience Lecture – Fred Gage, Grand Ballroom 5:30 – 6:30 pm GAM & Welcome Reception, Grand Ballroom Foyer & Exhibit Hall Sunday, April 14 7:30 am – 4:30 pm Onsite Registration & Pre-Registration Check-In, Grand Ballroom Foyer 8:00 am – 4:30 pm Exhibits on Display, Exhibit Hall (Closed from 12:00 – 1:30 pm) 8:00 – 8:30 am Continental Breakfast, Exhibit Hall 8:00 – 11:00 am Poster Session B, Exhibit Hall 9:00 – 10:00 am Keynote Address – Wiley Lecture in Cognitive Neuroscience, William Newsome, Grand Ballroom 10:15 am – 12:00 pm Invited Symposium 1 – Order and Disorder in the Emotion Brain: Emotional Regulation in Health and Disease – Richard Davidson, Chair, Grand Ballroom 12:00 – 1:00 pm NSF Workshop, Seacliff Room 12:00 – 1:30 pm Lunch Break 1:30 – 4:30 pm Poster Session C, Exhibit Hall 1:30 – 3:00 pm Invited Symposium 2 – Building Blocks for Language – Peter Hagoort, Chair, Grand Ballroom 3:00 – 3:30 pm Coffee Service, Exhibit Hall 3:00 – 4:30 pm Mini-Symposium 1- Analyzing patterns of brain activity to understand human vision and cognition, Bayview Room Mini-Symposium 2 - The role of concepts in affect and emotion: Contributions from affective neuro- science, Seacliff Room 20th Anniversary Gala Event 6:30 – 7:30 pm Cocktails, Atrium 7:30 – 10:00 pm Gala Dinner & Entertainment, Grand Ballroom Monday, April 15 8:00 am – 8:00 pm Onsite Registration & Pre-Registration Check-In, Grand Ballroom Foyer 8:00 – 8:30 am Continental Breakfast, Exhibit Hall 8:00 – 11:00 am Poster Session D, Exhibit Hall 8:00 am – 8:00 pm Exhibits on Display, Exhibit Hall (Closed from 12:00 – 1:30 pm) 9:00 – 10:00 am Keynote Address – MIT Press Lecture in Cognitive Neuroscience, Patricia Kuhl, Grand Ballroom 10:15 am – 12:00 pm Invited Symposium 3 – Memory On Time – Howard Eichenbaum, Chair, Grand Ballroom 12:00 – 1:00 pm Federal Funding Workshop, Grand Ballroom B 12:00 – 1:30 pm Lunch Break Cognitive Neuroscience Society 3 Schedule Overview 2013 Annual Meeting 1:30 – 4:30 pm Poster Session E, Exhibit Hall 1:30 – 3:00 pm Routledge Psychology YIA Special Lectures, Uta Noppeney, Tor Wager, and Roshan Cools, Bayview Room Mini-Symposium 3 - The effects of working memory training on brain and behavior, Garden Room Mini-Symposium 4 - Where memory meets language, Grand Ballroom B 2:30 – 3:00 pm Coffee Service, Exhibit Hall 3:00 – 4:30 pm Invited Symposium 4 – Functional Specifi city in the Visual System Nancy Kanwisher, Chair, Grand Ballroom 4:45 – 5:45 pm Distinguished Career Contributions in Cognitive Neuroscience Lecture Robert Knight, Grand Ballroom 5:45 – 6:45 pm DCC Reception, Grand Ballroom Foyer & Exhibit Hall 5:00 – 8:00 pm Poster Session F, Exhibit Hall Tuesday, April 16 8:00 am – 5:00 pm Onsite Registration & Pre-Registration Check-In, Grand Ballroom Foyer 8:00 am – 4:30 pm Exhibits on Display, Exhibit Hall (Closed from 12:00 – 1:30 pm) 8:00 – 8:30 am Continental Breakfast, Exhibit Hall 8:00 – 11:00 am Poster Session G, Exhibit Hall 9:00 – 10:00 am Keynote Address – The New York Academy of Sciences Lecture in Cognitive Neuroscience Joseph LeDoux, Grand Ballroom 10:15 am – 12:00 pm Invited Symposium 5 – Networking Attention – Anna Nobre, Chair, Grand Ballroom 12:00 – 1:30 pm Lunch Break 1:30 – 3:00 pm Mini-Symposium 5 - Neuroscience and Law: Promise and Perils – Grand Ballroom B 1:30 – 4:30 pm Poster Session H, Exhibit Hall 2:30 – 3:00 pm Coffee Service, Exhibit Hall 3:00 – 4:30 pm Invited Symposium 6 – Emerging Models of Human and Animal Decision-Making Paul Glimcher, Chair, Grand Ballroom CNSSA Student Social Night Saturday, April 13, 6:30 pm, Hotel Reception Area Come and join us for the annual CNSSA Student Social Night, Saturday April 13th, after the GAM reception. We will meet at 6:30 in the hotel reception area (close to the escalators on the second fl oor), and walk out to a nearby bar/restaurant. There will be no cover-charge and light snacks will be provided at the restaurant (cash bar). This event is open to all students and postdocs of the CNS. Come network with other students and explore the wonderful city of San Francisco with us! 4 Cognitive Neuroscience Society Keynotes William Newsome HHMI and Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University Wiley Lecture in Cognitive Neuroscience Keynote Address Sunday, April 14, 9:00 – 10:00 am, Grand Ballroom A New Look at Gating: Selective Integration of Sensory Signals Through Network Dynamics A hallmark of decision-making in primates is contextual sensitivity: a given stimulus can lead to different decisions depending on the context in which it is presented. This kind of fl exible decision-making depends critically upon gating and integration of context-ap- propriate information sources within the brain. We have analyzed neural mechanisms underlying gating and integration in animals trained to perform a context-sensitive decision task. Surprisingly, both relevant and irrelevant sensory signals are present within frontal lobe circuits that form decisions, implying that gating occurs very late in the process. Dynamical systems analysis of the neural data, combined with a dynamical recurrent network model, suggests a novel mechanism in which gating and integration are combined in a single process. Sponsored by Patricia K. Kuhl, Ph.D. Co-Director, Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences Director, NSF Science of Learning Center (The LIFE Center) University of Washington, Seattle, Washington MIT Press Lecture in Cognitive Neuroscience Keynote Address Monday, April 15, 9:00 – 10:00 am, Grand Ballroom The Human Language Puzzle: Advancing Theory Through Brain Science Debate on the origins of humans’ capacity for language has engaged philosophers, neuroscientists, and biologists, and more recently engineers and computer scientists who want to create technologies that enhance language learning. In this talk, I will show how co-registration of MRI, DTI, and Magnetoencephalography (MEG) in young infants is revising traditional views on the brain mechanisms underlying human language.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Of Boundary Extension: Anticipatory Scene Representation Across Development and Disorder
    Received: 23 July 2016 | Revised: 14 January 2017 | Accepted: 19 January 2017 DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22728 RESEARCH ARTICLE Testing the “Boundaries” of boundary extension: Anticipatory scene representation across development and disorder G. Spano1,2 | H. Intraub3 | J. O. Edgin1,2,4 1Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 Abstract 2Cognitive Science Program, University of Recent studies have suggested that Boundary Extension (BE), a scene construction error, may be Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 linked to the function of the hippocampus. In this study, we tested BE in two groups with varia- 3Department of Psychological and Brain tions in hippocampal development and disorder: a typically developing sample ranging from Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, preschool to adolescence and individuals with Down syndrome. We assessed BE across three dif- Delaware 19716 ferent test modalities: drawing, visual recognition, and a 3D scene boundary reconstruction task. 4Sonoran University Center for Excellence in Despite confirmed fluctuations in memory function measured through a neuropsychological Developmental Disabilities, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 assessment, the results showed consistent BE in all groups across test modalities, confirming the Correspondence near universal nature of BE. These results indicate that BE is an essential function driven by a com- Goffredina Spano, Wellcome Trust Centre plex set of processes, that occur even in the face of delayed memory development and for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, hippocampal dysfunction in special populations. University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Email: [email protected] KEYWORDS Funding information down syndrome, memory development, hippocampus, prediction error, top-down influences LuMind Research Down Syndrome Foundation; Research Down Syndrome and the Jerome Lejeune Foundation; Molly Lawson Graduate Fellow in Down Syndrome Research (GS).
    [Show full text]
  • Mind-Wandering in People with Hippocampal Damage
    This Accepted Manuscript has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. Research Articles: Behavioral/Cognitive Mind-wandering in people with hippocampal damage Cornelia McCormick1, Clive R. Rosenthal2, Thomas D. Miller2 and Eleanor A. Maguire1 1Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3AR, UK 2Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1812-17.2018 Received: 29 June 2017 Revised: 21 January 2018 Accepted: 24 January 2018 Published: 12 February 2018 Author contributions: C.M., C.R.R., T.D.M., and E.A.M. designed research; C.M. performed research; C.M., C.R.R., T.D.M., and E.A.M. analyzed data; C.M., C.R.R., T.D.M., and E.A.M. wrote the paper. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests. We thank all the participants, particularly the patients and their relatives, for the time and effort they contributed to this study. We also thank the consultant neurologists: Drs. M.J. Johnson, S.R. Irani, S. Jacobs and P. Maddison. We are grateful to Martina F. Callaghan for help with MRI sequence design, Trevor Chong for second scoring the Autobiographical Interview, Alice Liefgreen for second scoring the mind-wandering thoughts, and Elaine Williams for advice on hippocampal segmentation. E.A.M. and C.M. are supported by a Wellcome Principal Research Fellowship to E.A.M. (101759/Z/13/Z) and the Centre by a Centre Award from Wellcome (203147/Z/16/Z).
    [Show full text]
  • Aberrant Reward Processing in Parkinson's Disease Is Associated with Dopamine Cell Loss
    NeuroImage 59 (2012) 3339–3346 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect NeuroImage journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg Full-length Article Aberrant reward processing in Parkinson's disease is associated with dopamine cell loss Esther Aarts a,b,⁎,1, Rick C. Helmich a,c,1, Marcel J.R. Janssen a,d, Wim J.G. Oyen a,d, Bastiaan R. Bloem a,c, Roshan Cools a,b a Radboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands b Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Reinier Postlaan 10, 6525 GC Nijmegen, The Netherlands c Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Neurology, Parkinson Centre Nijmegen (ParC), Reinier Postlaan 4, 6525 GC Nijmegen, The Netherlands d Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Geert Grooteplein 8, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands article info abstract Article history: Dopamine has been implicated in reward-related impulsivity, but the exact relationship between dopamine, Received 3 August 2011 reward and impulsivity in humans remains unknown. We address this question in Parkinson's disease (PD), Revised 14 November 2011 which is characterized by severe dopamine depletion. PD is associated primarily with motor and cognitive Accepted 24 November 2011 inflexibility, but can also be accompanied by reward-related impulsivity. This paradoxical symptom of PD Available online 6 December 2011 has often been attributed to dopaminergic overstimulation by antiparkinson medication, which is necessary to relieve the motor and cognitive inflexibility. However, factors other than medication may also contribute Keywords: fl Impulsivity to aberrant impact of reward. Here we assess whether cognitive in exibility and aberrant reward impact in Dopamine PD are two sides of the same coin, namely dopamine cell loss.
    [Show full text]
  • CNS 2014 Program
    Cognitive Neuroscience Society 21st Annual Meeting, April 5-8, 2014 Marriott Copley Place Hotel, Boston, Massachusetts 2014 Annual Meeting Program Contents 2014 Committees & Staff . 2 Schedule Overview . 3 . Keynotes . 5 2014 George A . Miller Awardee . 6. Distinguished Career Contributions Awardee . 7 . Young Investigator Awardees . 8 . General Information . 10 Exhibitors . 13 . Invited-Symposium Sessions . 14 Mini-Symposium Sessions . 18 Poster Schedule . 32. Poster Session A . 33 Poster Session B . 66 Poster Session C . 98 Poster Session D . 130 Poster Session E . 163 Poster Session F . 195 . Poster Session G . 227 Poster Topic Index . 259. Author Index . 261 . Boston Marriott Copley Place Floorplan . 272. A Supplement of the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Cognitive Neuroscience Society c/o Center for the Mind and Brain 267 Cousteau Place, Davis, CA 95616 ISSN 1096-8857 © CNS www.cogneurosociety.org 2014 Committees & Staff Governing Board Mini-Symposium Committee Roberto Cabeza, Ph.D., Duke University David Badre, Ph.D., Brown University (Chair) Marta Kutas, Ph.D., University of California, San Diego Adam Aron, Ph.D., University of California, San Diego Helen Neville, Ph.D., University of Oregon Lila Davachi, Ph.D., New York University Daniel Schacter, Ph.D., Harvard University Elizabeth Kensinger, Ph.D., Boston College Michael S. Gazzaniga, Ph.D., University of California, Gina Kuperberg, Ph.D., Harvard University Santa Barbara (ex officio) Thad Polk, Ph.D., University of Michigan George R. Mangun, Ph.D., University of California,
    [Show full text]
  • Striatal Dopamine and the Interface Between Motivation and Cognition
    REVIEW ARTICLE published: 14 July 2011 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00163 Striatal dopamine and the interface between motivation and cognition Esther Aarts1*, Mieke van Holstein 2 and Roshan Cools 2,3 1 Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA 2 Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands 3 Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands Edited by: Brain dopamine has long been known to be implicated in the domains of appetitive motivation Wim Notebaert, Ghent University, and cognition. Recent work indicates that dopamine also plays a role in the interaction between Belgium appetitive motivation and cognition. Here we review this work. Animal work has revealed an Reviewed by: K. Richard Ridderinkhof, University of arrangement of spiraling connections between the midbrain and the striatum that subserves a Amsterdam, Netherlands mechanism by which dopamine can direct information flow from ventromedial to more dorsal Patrick Santens, Gent University, regions in the striatum. In line with current knowledge about dopamine’s effects on cognition, Belgium we hypothesize that these striato-nigro-striatal connections provide the basis for functionally *Correspondence: specific effects of appetitive motivation on cognition. One implication of this hypothesis is Esther Aarts, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California at that appetitive motivation
    [Show full text]
  • Decoding Representations of Scenes in the Medial Temporal Lobes
    HIPPOCAMPUS 22:1143–1153 (2012) Decoding Representations of Scenes in the Medial Temporal Lobes Heidi M. Bonnici,1 Dharshan Kumaran,2,3 Martin J. Chadwick,1 Nikolaus Weiskopf,1 Demis Hassabis,4 and Eleanor A. Maguire1* ABSTRACT: Recent theoretical perspectives have suggested that the (Eichenbaum, 2004; Johnson et al., 2007: Kumaran function of the human hippocampus, like its rodent counterpart, may be et al., 2009) and even visual perception (Lee et al., best characterized in terms of its information processing capacities. In this study, we use a combination of high-resolution functional magnetic 2005; Graham et al., 2006, 2010). Current perspec- resonance imaging, multivariate pattern analysis, and a simple decision tives, therefore, have emphasized that the function of making task, to test specific hypotheses concerning the role of the the hippocampus, and indeed surrounding areas within medial temporal lobe (MTL) in scene processing. We observed that the medial temporal lobe (MTL), may be best charac- while information that enabled two highly similar scenes to be distin- guished was widely distributed throughout the MTL, more distinct scene terized by understanding the nature of the information representations were present in the hippocampus, consistent with its processing they perform. role in performing pattern separation. As well as viewing the two similar The application of multivariate pattern analysis scenes, during scanning participants also viewed morphed scenes that (MVPA) techniques applied to functional magnetic spanned a continuum between the original two scenes. We found that patterns of hippocampal activity during morph trials, even when resonance imaging (fMRI) data (Haynes and Rees, perceptual inputs were held entirely constant (i.e., in 50% morph 2006; Norman et al., 2006) offers the possibility of trials), showed a robust relationship with participants’ choices in the characterizing the types of neural representations and decision task.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting KNAW Professor from Newcastle University
    78 BCN - School for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences june 2010 Interview with prof. dr. Daniel Nettle Visiting KNAW professor from r Newcastle University e Could you shortly introduce yourself? My name is Daniel Nettle. I am a behavioural scientist t from Newcastle University and I am a KNAW visiting professor this year, here in the Psychology Department. t I am here for some time now, but the KNAW professorship allows me to make several visits during the year, so I will be back later this year. e In my career, I started out as an anthropologist, but then I went to psychology and now I work in neuroscience. l For me, the fundamental issues are: How do we understand human behaviour; what part of behaviour comes from the situation people are in and what s part comes from the properties of the individual; the way their brain is set up. Whichever way you study behaviour, it is going to involve many disciplines, like biology, psychology, neuroscience, anthropology. When I worked on different problems concerning behaviour, w it just was easier to be attached to different institutes. You cannot isolate psychology from anthropology, neuroscience and biology. It is all kind of a mixture. e they live in. The ways we have of deciding in such Can you tell us about your research? questions will have been subject to natural selection My recent work is on reproductive decisions, specifically over many thousands of years. how do we decide when to have a baby. Do you have your first baby at 18 or 28 and if you have had one, Do you see that as a conscious decision? how long do you keep breastfeeding and when do you I think it is a funny old mixture.
    [Show full text]
  • From Squirrels to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): the Modulation of the Hippocampus
    The Science Journal of the Lander College of Arts and Sciences Volume 10 Number 1 Tenth Anniversary Edition: Fall 2016 - 2016 From Squirrels to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): The Modulation of the Hippocampus Rachel Ariella Bartfeld Touro College Follow this and additional works at: https://touroscholar.touro.edu/sjlcas Part of the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Commons, and the Nervous System Commons Recommended Citation Bartfeld, R. A. (2016). From Squirrels to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): The Modulation of the Hippocampus. The Science Journal of the Lander College of Arts and Sciences, 10(1). Retrieved from https://touroscholar.touro.edu/sjlcas/vol10/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Lander College of Arts and Sciences at Touro Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Science Journal of the Lander College of Arts and Sciences by an authorized editor of Touro Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. From Squirrels to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT): The Modulation of the Hippocampus Rachel Ariella Bartfeld Rachel Ariella Bartfeld graduated with a BS in Biology, Minor in Psychology in September 2016 and is accepted to Quinnipiac University, Frank H. Netter School of Medicine Abstract The legitimacy of psychotherapy can often be thrown into doubt as its mechanisms of action are generally considered hazy and unquantifiable. One way to support the effectiveness of therapy would be to demonstrate the physical effects that this treatment option can have on the brain, just like psychotropic medications that physically alter the brain’s construction leaving no doubt as to the potency of their effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Smutty Alchemy
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2021-01-18 Smutty Alchemy Smith, Mallory E. Land Smith, M. E. L. (2021). Smutty Alchemy (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/113019 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Smutty Alchemy by Mallory E. Land Smith A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH CALGARY, ALBERTA JANUARY, 2021 © Mallory E. Land Smith 2021 MELS ii Abstract Sina Queyras, in the essay “Lyric Conceptualism: A Manifesto in Progress,” describes the Lyric Conceptualist as a poet capable of recognizing the effects of disparate movements and employing a variety of lyric, conceptual, and language poetry techniques to continue to innovate in poetry without dismissing the work of other schools of poetic thought. Queyras sees the lyric conceptualist as an artistic curator who collects, modifies, selects, synthesizes, and adapts, to create verse that is both conceptual and accessible, using relevant materials and techniques from the past and present. This dissertation responds to Queyras’s idea with a collection of original poems in the lyric conceptualist mode, supported by a critical exegesis of that work.
    [Show full text]
  • Watching Movies Unfold – a Frame-By-Frame Analysis of the Associated Neural Dynamics
    Research Article: New Research | Cognition and Behavior Watching movies unfold – a frame-by-frame analysis of the associated neural dynamics https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0099-21.2021 Cite as: eNeuro 2021; 10.1523/ENEURO.0099-21.2021 Received: 14 March 2021 Revised: 21 May 2021 Accepted: 2 June 2021 This Early Release article has been peer-reviewed and accepted, but has not been through the composition and copyediting processes. The final version may differ slightly in style or formatting and will contain links to any extended data. Alerts: Sign up at www.eneuro.org/alerts to receive customized email alerts when the fully formatted version of this article is published. Copyright © 2021 Monk et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed. 1 2 3 Watching movies unfold – a frame-by-frame analysis of the associated neural 4 dynamics 5 6 7 Abbreviated title: Event processing and the hippocampus 8 9 10 Authors: Anna M. Monk, Daniel N. Barry, Vladimir Litvak, Gareth R. Barnes, Eleanor A. Maguire 11 12 13 Affiliation: Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of 14 Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR, UK 15 16 17 Author contributions: A.M.M. and E.A.M. designed the research; A.M.M. Performed the 18 research; All authors Analyzed the data; A.M.M. and E.A.M. wrote the paper 19 20 21 Correspondence should be addressed to Eleanor Maguire: [email protected] 22 23 24 Number of Figures: 3 25 Number of Tables: 0 26 Number of Multimedia: 0 27 Number of words for Abstract: 245 28 Number of words for significance statement: 107 29 Number of words for Introduction: 736 30 Number of words for Discussion: 2127 31 32 33 Acknowledgements: Thanks to Daniel Bates, David Bradbury and Eric Featherstone for technical 34 support, and Zita Patai for analysis advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Serotonergic Modulation of Prefrontal Cortex During Negative Feedback in Probabilistic Reversal Learning
    Neuropsychopharmacology (2005) 30, 1138–1147 & 2005 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/05 $30.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Serotonergic Modulation of Prefrontal Cortex during Negative Feedback in Probabilistic Reversal Learning 1 ,2,3 3 1 1 Elizabeth AT Evers , Roshan Cools* , Luke Clark , Frederik M van der Veen , Jelle Jolles , 4 3 Barbara J Sahakian and Trevor W Robbins 1Brain and Behavior Institute, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; 2Department of Psychology, University of California, 3 4 Berkeley, CA, USA; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Department of Psychiatry, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK This study used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the effects of acute tryptophan (TRP) depletion (ATD), a well- recognized method for inducing transient cerebral serotonin depletion, on brain activity during probabilistic reversal learning. Twelve healthy male volunteers received a TRP-depleting drink or a balanced amino-acid drink (placebo) in a double-blind crossover design. At 5 h after drink ingestion, subjects were scanned while performing a probabilistic reversal learning task and while viewing a flashing checkerboard. The probabilistic reversal learning task enabled the separate examination of the effects of ATD on behavioral reversal following negative feedback and negative feedback per se that was not followed by behavioral adaptation. Consistent with previous findings, behavioral reversal was accompanied by significant signal change in the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex. ATD enhanced reversal-related signal change in the dorsomedial PFC, but did not modulate the ventrolateral PFC response. The ATD-induced signal change in the dorsomedial PFC during behavioral reversal learning extended to trials where subjects received negative feedback but did not change their behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Decomposing Effects of Dopaminergic Medication in Parkinson’S Disease on Probabilistic Action Selection – Learning Or Performance?
    European Journal of Neuroscience European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 35, pp. 1144–1151, 2012 doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2012.08043.x Decomposing effects of dopaminergic medication in Parkinson’s disease on probabilistic action selection – learning or performance? P. Smittenaar,1 H. W. Chase,2 E. Aarts,3 B. Nusselein,4 B. R. Bloem5 and R. Cools4,6 1The Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, UK 2Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA 3Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA 4Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 5Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands 6Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Keywords: decision-making, dopamine, reinforcement learning, valence, value-based performance Abstract Dopamine has long been implicated in reward-based learning and the expression of such learned associations on performance. Robust evidence supports its effects on learning and performance, but teasing these apart has proved challenging. Here we have adapted a classic test of value-based learning, the probabilistic selection task, to disentangle effects of dopamine on value-based performance from effects on value-based learning. Valence-specific effects of dopamine on this specific task cannot be accounted for by modulation of learning, and therefore must reflect modulation of performance. We found that dopaminergic medication, consisting of levodopa and ⁄ or dopamine agonists taken at own dose, in 18 patients with mild Parkinson’s disease (Hoehn and Yahr < 2.5) potentiated reward-based approach in terms of both accuracy and reaction times, while leaving punishment-based avoidance unaffected.
    [Show full text]