Do Chlorophyllous Orchids Heterotrophically Use Mycorrhizal Fungal Carbon?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Do Chlorophyllous Orchids Heterotrophically Use Mycorrhizal Fungal Carbon? Spotlight Do chlorophyllous orchids heterotrophically use mycorrhizal fungal carbon? 1 2 Marc-Andre´ Selosse and Florent Martos 1 Muse´ um national d’Histoire naturelle, De´ partement Syste´ matique et Evolution (UMR 7205 ISYEB), CP 50, 45 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France 2 School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X01 Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg 3209, South Africa The roots of orchids associate with mycorrhizal fungi, intermediate between those of achlorophyllous orchids the rhizoctonias, which are considered to exchange min- and autotrophic plants [3], which is expected because they eral nutrients against plant carbon. The recent discovery mix both nutritional strategies. that rhizoctonias grow endophytically in non-orchid Beyond these exceptions, however, the vast majority of plants raises the possibility that they provide carbon orchids associate with rhizoctonias and, in adulthood, dis- 13 to orchids, explaining why some orchids differ in isoto- play a C abundance almost similar to that of autotrophic pic abundances from autotrophic plants. plants (Figure 1) [1,3], in spite of some small deviations (see below). It is thus currently assumed that rhizoctonia-asso- Orchids display several evolutionary innovations, including ciated orchids are autotrophic in adulthood, and do not use a mycorrhizal symbiosis with particular fungal lineages. rhizoctonias C after germination (e.g., [4]). These fungi, hitherto considered to be soil saprotrophs, are But these assumptions are challenged by two observa- collectively called the rhizoctonias [1]. One characteristic tions. First, rhizoctonia-associated orchids often display 15 feature of this symbiosis is symbiotic germination, where unusually high nitrogen (N) and N content compared to rhizoctonias colonize the reserveless orchid seeds and pro- other autotrophic plants [3,5]. These features are observed vide carbon (C) to the seedlings that grow heterotrophically to a greater extent in the fully or partially heterotrophic [1]. After the development of green leaves, adult orchids orchids that obtain organic matter from their mycorrhizal acquire autotrophy, and mycorrhizal fungi are thought to fungi [3,4], likely because (i) their pathway for gaining N receive C as a reward for providing mineral nutrients [2], as differs from that in autotrophic plants and (ii) the fungi have 15 in all other mycorrhizal symbioses [1]. However, recent high N and N contents. A gain of fungal organic matter in works suggest the reverse mechanism might also take rhizoctonia-associated orchids could thus explain their high 15 place, and that fungal C could actually be provided by the N and N content. Second, a recent paper reports that fungi to adult chlorophyllous orchids. seedlings of two rhizoctonia-associated orchids, which het- erotrophically recover C from their rhizoctonias, display 13 Orchids that use and abuse mycorrhizal fungal C lower C abundances than mycoheterotrophic orchids, al- A dependence on fungal C in adult orchids has been shown though these abundances are somewhat above those of for a small number of forest species that are partially or fully autotrophic plants [5]. Thus, C transferred from rhizocto- photosynthetic and display two particular features. First, nias to orchid protocorms is isotopically closer to C acquired their mycorrhizal partners have changed from the usual through photosynthesis, and small C transfers may be rhizoctonias to other fungal lineages: these orchids now difficult to detect. It is still ignored whether this reflects a associate with fungi, mostly from Basidiomycota, that either specific fractionation during rhizoctonia–to–orchid transfer, form mycorrhizae on surrounding trees (the so-called ecto- or if, as for fully or partially heterotrophic orchids mentioned 13 mycorrhizal fungi) [3] or live as litter- or wood-decaying previously, this simply reflects the C abundance of the saprotrophs [4]. Second, these orchids display much higher fungal source without fractionation. We speculate that the 13 C abundance than the C3 plants that surround them. The second explanation is likely, because an overlooked ecologi- 13 achlorophyllous orchids that obtain their entire C from their cal niche of rhizoctonias indeed predicts C abundance close 13 mycorrhizal fungi (mycoheterotrophic orchids) have a C to that of autotrophic plants. abundance identical to that of the saprotrophic or ectomy- corrhizal fungi that feed them (Figure 1), which are them- Rhizoctonias revisited 13 selves C-enriched compared with autotrophic plants There is evidence that rhizoctonias do not exclusively [3,4]. Moreover, the green orchids that are partially depend on orchid mycorrhizae for their C nutrition, but 13 heterotrophic (mixotrophic orchids) have a C content have their own, independent nutritional niche. Their saprotrophy is only indirectly suggested by the observation of in vitro growth on dead and sometimes complex organic Corresponding author: Selosse, M.-A. ([email protected]). matter [1], but there is no direct evidence under natural Keywords: root endophytic fungi; mixotrophy; mycoheterotrophy; orchid mycorrhizal 13 conditions. Strikingly, the C abundance observed in ger- symbiosis; stable isotope abundances; rhizoctonias. 13 minating seedlings [5] does not fit the high C abundance 1360-1385/ ß 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.09.005 expected for saprotrophic fungi (Figure 1) [4]. What then is the real ecological niche of rhizoctonias? Trends in Plant Science, November 2014, Vol. 19, No. 11 683 Spotlight Trends in Plant Science November 2014, Vol. 19, No. 11 (A) Green orchids Orchids associated with ectomycorrhizal fungi: Orchids associated associated with with parally heterotrophic fully heterotrophic saprotrophic fungi rhizoctonias (green, mixotrophic) (achlorophyllous) (achlorophyllous) ? δ13 C (B) C3 photosynthates Endophyc fungi, including rhizoctonias, Ectomycorrhizal Saprotrophic under the hypotheses of the present paper fungi fungi Key: 1 ‰ in δ13C TRENDS in Plant Science 13 13 Figure 1. Relative spontaneous C abundance for the main nutritional types of orchids (A) and their respective mycorrhizal fungi (B), distributed along increasing d C values. The vertical grey lines indicate trophic links, that is, exploitation of a C source: orchids may either rely on a single source or mix two sources. Fully heterotrophic 13 (mycoheterotrophic) orchids are largely enriched in C: they rely on C provided either by fungi that are ectomycorrhizal with surrounding tree roots (light brown) or by saprotrophic fungi (brown) that are even more enriched. Mixotrophic orchids (in yellow green) display intermediate enrichments: they use both C from ectomycorrhizal fungi and from their own photosynthesis. On the very left, green orchids (green) associated with rhizoctonias include the vast majority of species and are often considered 13 purely autotrophic in adulthood: they display C enrichments close to those of C3 autotrophs (blue-green range), but sometimes with a small excess or deficit. We propose 13 that the newly emerging ecological niche for rhizoctonias (blue) predicts similar C enrichments in their biomass: thus, a partial use of C from rhizoctonias (question mark) 13 13 would explain the large range of C abundances in rhizoctonia-associated orchids. Absolute values of C enrichments are not given on the diagram, because they vary according to environmental conditions, but an order of magnitude of the relative difference (expressed in %) is given in the key. Rhizoctonias belong to three independent Basidiomy- Hidden C flow from rhizoctonias to green adult orchids? cota lineages, Tulasnellaceae [1] and Ceratobasidiaceae [6] It is difficult to sample mycelia of endophytic fungi to 13 (two families of the order Cantharellales which contains assess their C abundance. However, fungi producing the chanterelle mushrooms), and Sebacinales [7]. Endo- fleshy fruitbodies, which allow analysis of isotopic abun- phytism, that is, diffuse growth within living plant tissues, dances, recently turned out to have endophytic abilities, without apparent infection symptoms or symbiotic organs such as for instance in the genus Hygrocybe [8]. Interest- 13 such as mycorrhizae, is common among fungi. Endophytic ingly, these fruitbodies reveal variable C abundances, growth in the roots of non-orchid plants now turns out to be which are rather close (equivalent, slightly lower or slight- a frequent and ancestral ability of Ceratobasidiaceae [6] ly higher) to those of autotrophic plants (Figure 1; see [8] and Sebacinales [7]. Tulasnellaceae, the most common and references therein). At first glance, this may seem orchid mycorrhizal lineage, is often missing in molecular unexpected because the ectomycorrhizal fungi, which re- 13 studies of fungal communities, which usually rely on bar- ceive C from tree photosynthesis, are enriched in C coding with the fungal ribosomal DNA (rDNA): because of (Figure 1), likely thanks to a fractionation at the root– their unusual rDNA sequences, Tulasnellaceae cannot all fungus interface. However, another mycorrhizal fungal be detected by general fungal-specific PCR primers. More group, the strictly biotrophic Glomeromycota forming environmental studies focusing on the overlooked Tulas- arbuscular mycorrhizae in many land plants [1], displays 13 nellaceae are needed, for example, using the available variable C abundances that are close to or even below Tulasnellaceae-specific rDNA primers (e.g., [4,5]), to sup- those
Recommended publications
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Scotland's Pinewoods for Their Wild Flowers
    Managing Scotland’s pinewoods for their wild fl owers Back from the Brink Management Series Back from the Brink Management Series Over the last two decades, there has been welcome enthusiasm for revitalising Scotland’s Old Caledonian pinewoods. Management has focused on regenerating trees within the few remaining natural woods and establishing trees to create ‘new native woodlands’ but with relatively little attention to the wider plant community of these woods. This booklet provides land managers with advice on managing native and semi-natural pinewoods for their vascular plant communities, based on recent and ongoing management trials. It focuses especially on the characteristic pinewood herbs. Plantlife is the organisation that is Wild plants have been marginalised and speaking up for the nation’s wild plants. taken for granted for too long. Please help We work hard to protect wild plants on the us by supporting our work. ground and to build understanding of the vital role they play in everyone’s lives. Wild plants To find out more, please visit our website are essential to life – they clean our air and or contact us at the office below. water, provide food and shelter for our insects, birds and animals and are critical in the fight Plantlife Scotland against climate change. Balallan House Allan Park Plantlife carries out practical conservation Stirling work across Scotland, manages nature FK8 2QG reserves, influences policy and legislation, Tel. 01786 478509/479382 runs events and activities that help people discover wild plants and works with others to promote the conservation of wild plants www.plantlife.org.uk for the benefit of all.
    [Show full text]
  • New Record of Goodyera Repens (L.) R. Br
    Life Science Journal 2013;10(4) http://www.lifesciencesite.com New record of Goodyera repens (L.) R. Br. (Orchidaceae) on Przedborska Upland (Poland) Andrzej Grzyl 1, Agnieszka Rewicz 2, Spyros Tsiftsis 3 1,2 Department of Geobotany and Plant Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Łódź, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łódź, Poland 3 Department of Botany, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece [email protected] Abstract: Goodyera repens in Poland occur mainly in the northern and north-eastern parts of the country, as well as in the Carpathians and the Sudeten Mountains. In central Poland it could be considered as a rare species which has been found only in a limited number of sites with a small number of individuals. In Poland it is characterized as a critically endangered species which faces the danger of extinction in many of its sites. A new site of G. repen has been found in central Poland hosting a relatively large number of individuals. Data about its habitat, its population size as well as its spatial structure are provided. [Grzyl, A, Rewicz, A, Tsiftsis, S. New record of Goodyera repens (L.) R. Br. (Orchidaceae) on Przedborska Upland (Poland). Life Sci J 2013;10(4):2993-2995]. (ISSN:1097-8135). http://www.lifesciencesite.com. 397 Key words: Goodyera repens; Chęcińsko-Kielecki Landacape Park; floristic diversity; rare species; protected species; new locality 1. Introduction (Kucharczyk and Wójciak, 1995), while according to Goodyera repens (L.) R. Br. (Creeping Lady's Bróż and Przemyski (2009) in western Poland it is Tresses) is a circumboreal species that mainly occurs regarded as vulnerable (V) and in northern Poland in Central, North and East Europe, Caucasus, North (Gdańsk Pomerania) is considered as near threatened and East Asia, the Himalayas and North America (NT) (Markowski and Buliński, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Cypripedium and Goodyera to Disturbance in the Thunder Bay Area
    Lakehead University Knowledge Commons,http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca Electronic Theses and Dissertations Undergraduate theses 2018 Response of Cypripedium and Goodyera to disturbance in the Thunder Bay area Davis, Danielle http://knowledgecommons.lakeheadu.ca/handle/2453/4426 Downloaded from Lakehead University, KnowledgeCommons 5(63216(2)&<35,3(',80$1'*22'<(5$72',6785%$1&(,1 7+(7+81'(5%$<$5($ E\ 'DQLHOOH'DYLV )$&8/7<2)1$785$/5(6285&(60$1$*(0(17 /$.(+($'81,9(56,7< 7+81'(5%$<217$5,2 0D\ RESPONSE OF CYPRIPEDIUM AND GOODYERA TO DISTURBANCE IN THE THUNDER BAY AREA by Danielle Davis An Undergraduate Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Honours Bachelor of Environmental Management Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University May 2018 Major Advisor Second Reader ii LIBRARY RIGHTS STATEMENT In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the HBEM degree at Lakehead University in Thunder Bay, I agree that the University will make it freely available for inspection. This thesis is made available by my authority solely for the purpose of private study and research and may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part (except as permitted by the Copyright Laws) without my written authority. Signature: Date: iii A CAUTION TO THE READER This HBEM thesis has been through a semi-formal process of review and comment by at least two faculty members. It is made available for loan by the Faculty of Natural Resources Management for the purpose of advancing the practice of professional and scientific forestry.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment for White Adder's Mouth Orchid (Malaxis B Brachypoda)
    Conservation Assessment for White Adder’s Mouth Orchid (Malaxis B Brachypoda) (A. Gray) Fernald Photo: Kenneth J. Sytsma USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region April 2003 Jan Schultz 2727 N Lincoln Road Escanaba, MI 49829 906-786-4062 This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on Malaxis brachypoda (A. Gray) Fernald. This is an administrative study only and does not represent a management decision or direction by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was gathered and reported in preparation for this document and subsequently reviewed by subject experts, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if the reader has information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact: Eastern Region, USDA Forest Service, Threatened and Endangered Species Program, 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. Conservation Assessment for White Adder’s Mouth Orchid (Malaxis Brachypoda) (A. Gray) Fernald 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..............................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..............................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES ...................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Determining the Distribution of Orchids – a Review with Examples from the Czech Republic
    European Journal of Environmental Sciences 21 FACTORS DETERMINING THE DISTRIBUTION OF ORCHIDS – A REVIEW WITH EXAMPLES FROM THE CZECH REPUBLIC ZUZANA ŠTÍPKOVÁ1,2,* and PAVEL KINDLMANN1,2 1 Global Change Research Institute, Czech Academy of Science, Bělidla 986/4a, 60300 Brno, Czech Republic 2 Institute for Environmental Studies, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, 12801 Prague 2, Czech Republic * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT The natural environment has been significantly altered by human activity over the past few decades. There is evidence we are now experiencing the sixth mass extinction, as many species of plants and animals are declining in abundance. We focused on the Orchidaceae because this plant family has experienced one of the biggest reductions in distribution. We investigated patterns in species richness and distribution of orchids, the rate and causes of their decrease and extinction, and factors influencing their occurrence in the Czech Republic and Greece. The key findings are: (i) Method of pollination and type of rooting system are associated with their distributions and they are different in the two countries. We assume that these differences might be due to the difference in the orography, distribution of suitable habitats and types of bedrock in these two countries. (ii) The greatest reduction in distribution was recorded for critically endangered taxa of orchids. The number of sites suitable for orchids in the Czech Republic declined by 8–92%. The most threatened orchid species are Spiranthes spiralis, Anacamptis palustris, Epipogium aphyllum and Goodyera repens. The distribution of orchids in the Czech Republic is mainly determined by the distribution of their habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park: 2014 Data Summary
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park 2014 Data Summary Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2016/1016 ON THIS PAGE Tiny, bright yellow blossoms of Hypoxis hirsuta grace the forest floor at Congaree National Park. Photograph courtesy of Sarah C. Heath, Southeast Coast Network. ON THE COVER Spiraling compound leaf of green dragon (Arisaema dracontium) at Congaree National Park. Photograph courtesy of Sarah C. Heath, Southeast Coast Network Vegetation Community Monitoring at Congaree National Park 2014 Data Summary Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2016/1016 Sarah Corbett Heath1 and Michael W. Byrne2 1National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, GA 31558 2National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network 135 Phoenix Drive Athens, GA 30605 May 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed.
    [Show full text]
  • FOREST FLORA Woodland Conservation News • Spring 2018
    Wood Wise FOREST FLORA Woodland Conservation News • Spring 2018 QUESTIONING SURVEYING TIME FOR WOODLAND ANCIENT & RESTORING A BUNCE FLORA WOODLAND WOODLAND WOODLAND FOLKLORE INDICATORS FLORA RESURVEY & REMEDIES CONTENTS Smith / Georgina WTML 3 4 8 11 16 20 22 24 Introduction Spring is probably the best time to appreciate woodland The Woodland Trust’s Alastair Hotchkiss focuses on the ground flora. The warming temperatures encourage restoration of plantations on ancient woodland sites. 25 shoots to burst from bulbs, breaking through the soil Gradual thinning and natural regeneration of native trees Introduction to reach the sunlight not yet blocked out by leaves that can allow sunlight to reach the soil again and enable the 3 will soon fill the tree canopy. Their flowers bring colour return of wildflowers surviving in the seed bank. to break the stark winter and inspire hope in many that Questioning ancient woodland indicators The Woodland Survey of Great Britain 1971-2001 4 see them. recorded a change and loss in broadleaf woodland The species of flora covered in this issue are vascular ground flora species. The driver was thought to be a plants found on the woodland floor layer. Vascular plants 8 Trouble for bluebells? reduction in the use and management of woods. This have specialised tissues within their form that carry finding encouraged an increase in management. Several The world beneath your feet water and nutrients around their stems, leaves and other experts involved look at this and the potential for a future 11 structures, which allow them to grow taller than non- resurvey to analyse the current situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudorchis Albida (L.) Á
    Pseudorchis albida (L.) Á. and D. Löve Small White Orchid As the common name suggests, Pseudorchis albida is a diminutive orchid with tiny, creamy- white, scented flowers that attract a variety of day-flying insects. It is able to tolerate a wide range of ecological conditions, having a pH range of between 4 and 7, but is most often found in low fertility mesotrophic grasslands and acid heathlands, and more rarely in base- rich mires, limestone heath, and cliff ledges. It is most widespread in the north and west of Scotland but has experienced substantial declines across its range, particularly in Ireland, England and Wales. Pseudorchis albida is assessed as Vulnerable in GB and Critically Endangered in Wales. ©Joan Canals IDENTIFICATION having stomata above (only on the underside of the leaf in P. albida), G. repens by the presence of petioles and C. viride by Pseudorchis albida is a diminutive orchid with a dense spike the absence of longitudinal streaking (Poland & Clements, of very small, creamy-white flowers (2-4 mm across) with a 2009). In Britain, hybrids with Gymnadenia borealis have deeply three-lobed lip. Its leaves have translucent longitudinal been widely reported from Scotland and northern England streaks, are glossy green above, silvery below, and have a and with Dactylorhiza maculata in Skye and Orkney. hooded tip (Poland & Clements, 2009). Throughout its range Reported hybrids with Platanthera chlorantha are now P. albida is probably overlooked due to its small stature, short thought to be aberrant forms of the latter. flowering period, erratic appearance and tendency to form small populations (Duffey et al., 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 DEMOGRAPHIC STUDIES and LIFE-HISTORY STRATEGIES
    K.w. Dixon, S.P. Kell, R.L. Barrett and P.J. Cribb (eds) 2003. Orchid Conservation. pp. 137-158. © Natural History Publications (Borneo), Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. Chapter 8 DEMOGRAPHIC STUDIES AND LIFE-HISTORY STRATEGIES OF TEMPERATE TERRESTRIAL ORCIDDS AS A BASIS FOR CONSERVATION Dennis F Whigham Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Box. 28, Edgewater, MD 21037, USA. Jo H. Willems Plant Ecology Group, Utrecht University, PO Box 800.84, NL 3508 Utrecht, The Netherlands. "Our knowledge about the lives ofindividual plants and oftheir persistence in plant communities is very incomplete, however, especially when perennial herbs are concerned" - C. 0. Tamm, 1948. Terrestrial orchids represent a wide diversity ofspecies that are characterised by an equally diverse range of life history attributes. Threatened and endangered species of terrestrial orchids have been identifed on all continents where they occur and conservation plans have been developed for some species. Even though there is a considerable amount of information on the ecology of terrestrial orchids, few species have been studied in detail and most management plans focus on habitat conservation. In this paper, we consider the diversity of terrestrial orchids and summarise information on threatened and endangered species from a global perspective. We also describe approaches to the conservation and restoration ofterrestrial orchids and develop the argument that much information is needed ifwe are to successfully conserve this diverse group ofplant species. 1. Introduction Terrestrial orchids represent a wide variety of life history types, from autotrophic evergreen to completely myco-heterotrophic species that obtain most oftheir resources from a mycobiont. Life history characteristics ofterrestrial orchids are generally well known (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestral State Reconstruction of the Mycorrhizal Association for the Last Common Ancestor of Embryophyta, Given the Different Phylogenetic Constraints
    Supplementary information Supplementary Figures Figure S1 | Ancestral state reconstruction of the mycorrhizal association for the last common ancestor of Embryophyta, given the different phylogenetic constraints. Pie charts show the likelihood of the ancestral states for the MRCA of Embryophyta for each phylogenetic hypothesis shown below. Letters represent mycorrhizal associations: (A) Ascomycota; (B) Basidiomycota; (G) Glomeromycotina; (M) Mucoromycotina; (-) Non-mycorrhizal. Combinations of letters represent a combination of mycorrhizal associations. Austrocedrus chilensis Chamaecyparis obtusa Sequoiadendron giganteum Prumnopitys taxifolia Prumnopitys Prumnopitys montana Prumnopitys Prumnopitys ferruginea Prumnopitys Araucaria angustifolia Araucaria Dacrycarpus dacrydioides Dacrycarpus Taxus baccata Podocarpus oleifolius Podocarpus Afrocarpus falcatus Afrocarpus Ephedra fragilis Nymphaea alba Nymphaea Gnetum gnemon Abies alba Abies balsamea Austrobaileya scandens Austrobaileya Abies nordmanniana Thalictrum minus Thalictrum Abies homolepis Caltha palustris Caltha Abies magnifica ia repens Ranunculus Abies religiosa Ranunculus montanus Ranunculus Clematis vitalba Clematis Keteleeria davidiana Anemone patens Anemone Tsuga canadensis Vitis vinifera Vitis Tsuga mertensiana Saxifraga oppositifolia Saxifraga Larix decidua Hypericum maculatum Hypericum Larix gmelinii Phyllanthus calycinus Phyllanthus Larix kaempferi Hieronyma oblonga Hieronyma Pseudotsuga menziesii Salix reinii Salix Picea abies Salix polaris Salix Picea crassifolia Salix herbacea
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Survey of the Native Pinewoods of Scotland 1971
    Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 177–189, 2016 www.earth-syst-sci-data.net/8/177/2016/ doi:10.5194/essd-8-177-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Ecological survey of the native pinewoods of Scotland 1971 Claire M. Wood1 and Robert G. H. Bunce2 1Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Bailrigg, Lancaster LA1 4AP, UK 2Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreuzwaldi 5, 51014 Tartu, Estonia Correspondence to: Claire M. Wood ([email protected]) Received: 3 February 2016 – Published in Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss.: 10 February 2016 Revised: 8 April 2016 – Accepted: 20 April 2016 – Published: 10 May 2016 Abstract. In 1971, a comprehensive ecological survey of the native pinewoods of Scotland was carried out by the Institute of Terrestrial Ecology. The survey was initiated as a consequence of growing concern about the status of the pinewood resource. Since the twentieth century, this unique habitat is widely recognised, not only by ecologists for its inherent biodiversity but also by the general public for its cultural and amenity value. The survey, utilising demonstrably repeatable methods, collected information on ground flora, soils, forest structure and also general site information from the major 27 sites of the 35 sites identified as truly native pinewoods in Scotland. The results from the survey prompted the organisation of an international symposium in 1975, which set the conservation agenda for the old Caledonian pinewoods. The data collected during the 1971 survey are now publicly available via the following DOI: doi:10/7xb (“Habitat, vegetation, tree and soil data from Native Pinewoods in Scotland, 1971”).
    [Show full text]