DOCSLIB.ORG

Acoustic Mode, 284 Acoustic Cloaking, 228, 244 Inertial, 256 Acoustic

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acoustic Mode, 284 Acoustic Cloaking, 228, 244 Inertial, 256 Acoustic Index acoustic mode, 284 Bloch wave mode, 281 acoustic cloaking, 228, 244 Bloch wave vector, 269, 272 inertial, 256 Bloch-Floquet theorem, 205, 269, 285, acoustic intensity level, 23 288 acoustic metafluid, 220, 255, 256 body force, 13, 196 acoustic metamaterial, 191 bound electron, 130 acoustic power, 23 Brewster’s angle, 66, 76 acoustic tensor, 52, 347 Brillouin zone, 284 effective, 274 bubbly liquid, 275 acoustics, 16, 63, 64, 107, 267 bulk modulus, 17, 267, 275 adiabatic, 17 complex, 181 adiabatic index, 17 bulk viscosity, 18 adjoint, 199 effective, 278 Airy equation, 312 Airy function, 312 capacitance, 141 Ament’s relation, 153 Cartesian coordinates Ampere’s law, 26 acoustics, 19 angular momentum, 4, 177 elastodynamics, 7 anisotropic mass, 167 electrodynamics, 31 anisotropic mass density, 40, 167, 326 Cauchy principal value, 171 anisotropy, 324, 325 Cauchy stress, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 14, 17, anomalous cloaking, 243 18, 56, 62, 69, 114, 182, 186, antiplane shear, 13, 37, 38, 54, 190 189, 196, 203, 211, 252, 271, artificial magnetism, 137 272, 277, 301, 325, 335, 336, attenuation length, 282 347 auxetic material, 214 unsymmetric, 213 axial vector, 175 Cauchy’s integral formula, 169 Cauchy-Goursat theorem, 171 Backus upscaling, 334 Cauchy-Riemann equations, 169 band gap, 190, 285 causality, 5, 17, 20, 34, 41, 140, 169, Bessel function, 97, 122, 136, 141, 312 184, 241 spherical, 107 chiral medium, 203 Bessel’s equation, 97, 117 Christoffel symbols, 9 bi-anisotropic medium, 202 cloaking, 227 Biot-Savart law, 26 acoustic, 244 Bloch condition, 269, 291 elastodynamics, 251 Bloch wave, 208, 269, 272, 278 electromagnetism, 235 357 358 An Introduction to Metamaterials and Waves in Composites cloaking transformation, 238 easy strain, 217 coated sphere, 275 effective bulk modulus, 276 coherent potential approximation, 119, effective density, 333 192 effective dynamic mass, 159 conductivity effective field, 119 electrical, 231 effective mass, 163 conservation effective permeability, 190, 280 angular momentum, 4 effective permittivity, 280, 339 linear momentum, 4, 18 effective phase velocity, 333 mass, 16 effective property, 334 constitutive relation, 5, 196 eigen decomposition, 215, 328 convolution, 10, 197 eigenvalue, 166, 206, 215, 320 convolution theorem, 169 eigenvalue problem, 267, 272, 279, 281, Coulomb’s law, 25 319 CPA method, 119 eigenvector, 166, 320 curl, 31 Eikonal equation, 315 curvilinear coordinates, 32, 238 elastic wave equation, 40 acoustics, 19 elastodynamic power, 13 elastodynamics, 8 elastodynamic wave, 270 electrodynamics, 31 elastodynamics, 51, 112, 290 cylindrical coordinates, 96, 122, 124, 134, governing equations, 3 141 periodic, 270 quasistatic limit, 270 Willis equations, 194 damping constant, 162 electric current, 26 damping factor, 182 electric dipole, 105 dashpot, 160 electric displacement, 27 Debye potential, 112, 116 electric field, 25 deformation gradient, 230 electric permittivity, 27 deviatoric stress, 18 electric polarization, 27 dielectric constant, 27, 131 electric susceptibility, 27 diffraction, 145 electrical conductivity, 28, 41 dipole moment, 27, 130, 131 electrodynamic metamaterial, 129 dipole source, 99 electrodynamics, 24, 71, 72, 87, 104, Dirac delta function, 96, 98 115 Dirichlet to Neumann map, 233 periodic, 278 dispersion, 51, 110, 290 quasistatic limit, 278 dispersion relation, 51, 133, 206, 272, electromagnetic impedance 274, 281, 284, 289 characteristic, 79 displacement, 53, 197 electromotive force, 27 displacement gradient, 6 electrostatics, 25 dissipation, 13, 23, 41, 42 ensemble averaging, 194 divergence theorem, 14, 42, 248 ergodicity, 194 Drude model, 133 Euler-Lagrange equations, 163–165, 205 dynamic mass, 161 Eulerian description, 16 Index 359 evanescent wave, 89, 99, 133, 147, 329 characteristic, 67 extremal material, 214 effective, 331 elastic, 58, 165 fading memory, 185, 188 electrical, 231 far-field pattern, 123 electromagnetic, 79, 241 Faraday’s law, 27 normal, 79 folding transformation, 235 impedance matching, 68, 80, 148, 241 Foldy-Lax method, 119 impedance tube, 84, 85, 91, 163 Fourier transform, 10, 11, 98, 101 incident wave, 64, 72 free-body diagram, 158 independent scattering, 118 frequency, 64 inductance, 141 Fresnel equations, 75, 89 inertia function frequency dependent, 173 completely monotonic, 188 inertial cloak, 244 infinite mass, 249 gauge transformation, 30 infinitesimal strain, 6 Gauss’s law, 25 inhomogeneous wave, 103 Graf’s addition theorem, 124 integral matrix, 321 Green’s function, 96, 97, 199 intensity, 23 Greenleaf-Leonhardt-Pendry, 227 irrotational flow, 18 group velocity, 51, 147, 281, 284, 285 isotropic material, 6 gyrocontinua, 173 Jacobian, 229, 230 Hamiltonian, 163 Jacobian matrix, 103 Hankel function, 97, 99 spherical, 108 Kelvin moduli, 215 harmonic plane wave, 50 Korringa-Kohn-Rostoker method, 119 Hashin’s relations, 193, 276 Kramers-Kronig relation, 169 elastostatics, 275, 296 electrostatics, 296, 349 Lagrangian, 162, 165, 204 Helmholtz equation, 49 Lagrangian description, 16 Helmholtz potential Lame´ moduli, 6 body force, 6 Lame’s´ theorem, 6 Helmholtz resonator, 179, 192 Laplace-Beltrami operator, 9, 263 Hertz vector potentials, 30, 116 lattice spacing, 271 hierarchical laminates, 214 layered media, 299 homogeneous material, 6 periodic, 326 homogenization, 136, 139, 143, 169, 190, Legendre polynomial, 107, 111 266, 274, 299, 308, 334 associated, 117 Hooke’s law, 158 Legendre’s equation, 107 Leibniz rule, 42 ideal gas, 17 linear elastic, 196 image resolution, 145 micromorphic, 173 impedance, 141, 167 linear momentum, 4, 156, 176 acoustic, 67, 83, 164, 330 linear operator, 199, 267, 272 360 An Introduction to Metamaterials and Waves in Composites linear superposition, 25 multiple scales analysis, 273 linear viscoelasticity, 184 multiple scattering, 119, 193 locally resonant sonic material, see LRSM multipole, 120 Lorenz condition, 30 Love wave, 300 Nanson’s formula, 248 LRSM, 86, 154, 290 Navier-Stokes equations, 16 lumped-mass model, see spring-mass sys- negative density, 62 tem negative index, 145 negative mass, 40, 159 magnetic field, 28 negative modulus, 155, 179 magnetic flux density, 25 negative refractive index, 62, 67, 70, 80, magnetic induction, 25 129 magnetic moment density, 28 mirror, 80 magnetic monopole, 25 negative shear modulus, 62 magnetic permeability, 26, 28 Newton’s second law, 158 effective, 139 Newtonian fluid, 18 magnetization vector, 28 nonlocal, 5 magnetostatics, 25 normal strain, 220 magnification, 243 null space, 268 mass frequency dependent, 154, 159, 161, Ohm’s law, 28 169 Onsager reciprocity relations, 41 mass density, 197, 267, 271 optical mode, 285 anisotropic, 155 dynamic, 154 p-polarization, 38 effective, 153 P-wave, 6, 9, 55, 56, 60 negative, 154 pentamode material, 214, 217, 254–256 static, 153 perfect lens, 143, 241 transversely isotropic, 334 periodic media matricant, 326 one-dimensional, 326 Maxwell model, 160 periodic medium, 271 generalized, 184, 189 permittivity, 25, 130, 131, 161 Maxwell’s equations, 24, 28, 31–34, 37, negative, 137 39, 71, 72, 104, 116, 134, 227, perturbation, 272 235, 238, 254, 270, 278, 280, phase, 51 324 phase speed, 72 Mie solution, 115 phase velocity, 36, 51, 73, 147, 281 Milton’s relation, 346 phononic crystals, 265 molecule, 153 photonic crystals, 265 momentum, 196, 210 plane wave, 50 balance of, 196 acoustics, 63 linear, 209 elastodynamics, 51 monochromatic plane wave, 50 electrodynamics, 71 monodromy matrix, 326, 328 plane wave expansion, 95 multilayered cloak, 247 plasma frequency, 133 Index 361 magnetic, 143 Runge-Kutta method, 310 plasmon, 133 RVE, 136, 137, 139, 156, 203, 205, 207, Poisson’s ratio 208, 210–212, 266, 270, 272, negative, 214 274, 276, 280, 282, 283, 286, polar decomposition theorem, 249 287, 291 polarization, 54, 73 polarization field, 198, 341 s-polarized wave, 37 porous media, 153 S-wave, 6 Poynting vector, 147 scalar potential, 41 principle of minimum dissipation, 42 acoustic, 19 projection operator, 250, 341, 346 elastodynamics, 6 propagating wave, 99 electrodynamics, 29 propagator matrix, 302, 318, 320, 326 scattering, 106, 265 pseudo-pressure, 220, 256 acoustic, 107, 110, 122 pull-back, 236, 252 cross-section, 110 elastodynamic, 112 quasistatic limit, 273 electrodynamic, 115 scattering cross-section, 115 radial map, 240 Schoenberg-Sen model, 192, 326 rank-1 laminate, 342 self-consistent method, 119 ray parameter, 58 SH-wave, 13, 54, 61, 62, 189, 190, 247, ray theory, 315 292 Rayleigh multipole method, 120 shear modulus, 6, 190, 275, 300 reciprocal lattice vector, 269 complex, 277 recursion relation, 306 negative, 191 reflected wave, 65, 72 shear strain, 220 reflection coefficient, 57, 65, 75, 84, 89, shear viscosity, 18, 160, 277 147, 306, 322, 331 single scattering, 106, 118, 241 apparent, 89 slab, 82 generalized, 308 slowness surface, 220 reflectivity, 87 slowness vector, 52, 53, 55, 56, 332, refractive index, 62, 70, 73 333 negative, 191 Snell’s law, 58, 66, 73 relaxation spectrum, 185, 188 spectral decomposition, 214 relaxation time, 185 spherical coordinates, 96, 100, 103, 108, representative volume element, see RVE 109, 113, 116, 118 residue, 101 spherical harmonics, 117 resistance, 141 split-ring resonator, 137, 138, 140, 142, resonance, 27, 87, 93, 127, 129, 131, 143, 189, 190 133, 148, 156, 159, 162, 169, spring constant 183, 192, 214 complex, 160 anomalous, 242 effective, 185 frequency, 159, 163 real, 160 Riccati equation, 310 spring-mass system, 158, 159, 162, 165, rotating ring, 173 167, 179, 189, 190, 192, 203, 362 An Introduction to Metamaterials
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electrostatics Vs Magnetostatics Electrostatics Magnetostatics
    Electrostatics vs Magnetostatics Electrostatics Magnetostatics Stationary charges ⇒ Constant Electric Field Steady currents ⇒ Constant Magnetic Field Coulomb’s Law Biot-Savart’s Law 1 ̂ ̂ 4 4 (Inverse Square Law) (Inverse Square Law) Electric field is the negative gradient of the Magnetic field is the curl of magnetic vector electric scalar potential. potential. 1 ′ ′ ′ ′ 4 |′| 4 |′| Electric Scalar Potential Magnetic Vector Potential Three Poisson’s equations for solving Poisson’s equation for solving electric scalar magnetic vector potential potential. Discrete 2 Physical Dipole ′′′ Continuous Magnetic Dipole Moment Electric Dipole Moment 1 1 1 3 ∙̂̂ 3 ∙̂̂ 4 4 Electric field cause by an electric dipole Magnetic field cause by a magnetic dipole Torque on an electric dipole Torque on a magnetic dipole ∙ ∙ Electric force on an electric dipole Magnetic force on a magnetic dipole ∙ ∙ Electric Potential Energy Magnetic Potential Energy of an electric dipole of a magnetic dipole Electric Dipole Moment per unit volume Magnetic Dipole Moment per unit volume (Polarisation) (Magnetisation) ∙ Volume Bound Charge Density Volume Bound Current Density ∙ Surface Bound Charge Density Surface Bound Current Density Volume Charge Density Volume Current Density Net , Free , Bound Net , Free , Bound Volume Charge Volume Current Net , Free , Bound Net ,Free , Bound 1 = Electric field = Magnetic field = Electric Displacement = Auxiliary
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Electrostatics and Magenetostatics
    Review of electrostatics and magenetostatics January 12, 2016 1 Electrostatics 1.1 Coulomb’s law and the electric field Starting from Coulomb’s law for the force produced by a charge Q at the origin on a charge q at x, qQ F (x) = 2 x^ 4π0 jxj where x^ is a unit vector pointing from Q toward q. We may generalize this to let the source charge Q be at an arbitrary postion x0 by writing the distance between the charges as jx − x0j and the unit vector from Qto q as x − x0 jx − x0j Then Coulomb’s law becomes qQ x − x0 x − x0 F (x) = 2 0 4π0 jx − xij jx − x j Define the electric field as the force per unit charge at any given position, F (x) E (x) ≡ q Q x − x0 = 3 4π0 jx − x0j We think of the electric field as existing at each point in space, so that any charge q placed at x experiences a force qE (x). Since Coulomb’s law is linear in the charges, the electric field for multiple charges is just the sum of the fields from each, n X qi x − xi E (x) = 4π 3 i=1 0 jx − xij Knowing the electric field is equivalent to knowing Coulomb’s law. To formulate the equivalent of Coulomb’s law for a continuous distribution of charge, we introduce the charge density, ρ (x). We can define this as the total charge per unit volume for a volume centered at the position x, in the limit as the volume becomes “small”.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Boundary Conditions 1/6
    11/28/2004 Magnetic Boundary Conditions 1/6 Magnetic Boundary Conditions Consider the interface between two different materials with dissimilar permeabilities: HB11(r,) (r) µ1 HB22(r,) (r) µ2 Say that a magnetic field and a magnetic flux density is present in both regions. Q: How are the fields in dielectric region 1 (i.e., HB11()rr, ()) related to the fields in region 2 (i.e., HB22()rr, ())? A: They must satisfy the magnetic boundary conditions ! Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 11/28/2004 Magnetic Boundary Conditions 2/6 First, let’s write the fields at the interface in terms of their normal (e.g.,Hn ()r ) and tangential (e.g.,Ht (r ) ) vector components: H r = H r + H r H1n ()r 1 ( ) 1t ( ) 1n () ˆan µ 1 H1t (r ) H2t (r ) H2n ()r H2 (r ) = H2t (r ) + H2n ()r µ 2 Our first boundary condition states that the tangential component of the magnetic field is continuous across a boundary. In other words: HH12tb(rr) = tb( ) where rb denotes to any point along the interface (e.g., material boundary). Jim Stiles The Univ. of Kansas Dept. of EECS 11/28/2004 Magnetic Boundary Conditions 3/6 The tangential component of the magnetic field on one side of the material boundary is equal to the tangential component on the other side ! We can likewise consider the magnetic flux densities on the material interface in terms of their normal and tangential components: BHrr= µ B1n ()r 111( ) ( ) ˆan µ 1 B1t (r ) B2t (r ) B2n ()r BH222(rr) = µ ( ) µ2 The second magnetic boundary condition states that the normal vector component of the magnetic flux density is continuous across the material boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardy-Type Inequalities for Integral Transforms Associated with Jacobi Operator
    HARDY-TYPE INEQUALITIES FOR INTEGRAL TRANSFORMS ASSOCIATED WITH JACOBI OPERATOR M. DZIRI AND L. T. RACHDI Received 8 April 2004 and in revised form 24 December 2004 We establish Hardy-type inequalities for the Riemann-Liouville and Weyl transforms as- sociated with the Jacobi operator by using Hardy-type inequalities for a class of integral operators. 1. Introduction It is well known that the Jacobi second-order differential operator is defined on ]0,+∞[ by 1 d du 2 ∆α,βu(x) = Aα,β(x) + ρ u(x), (1.1) Aα,β(x) dx dx where 2ρ 2α+1 2β+1 (i) Aα,β(x) = 2 sinh (x)cosh (x), (ii) α,β ∈ R; α ≥ β>−1/2, (iii) ρ = α + β +1. The Riemann-Liouville and Weyl transforms associated with Jacobi operator ∆α,β are, respectively, defined, for every nonnegative measurable function f ,by x Rα,β( f )(x) = kα,β(x, y) f (y)dy, 0 ∞ (1.2) Wα,β( f )(y) = kα,β(x, y) f (x)Aα,β(x)dx, y where kα,β is the nonnegative kernel defined, for x>y>0, by −1 2 2−α+3/2Γ(α +1) cosh(2x) − cosh(2y) α / kα,β(x, y) = √ πΓ(α +1/2)coshα+β(x)sinh2α(x) (1.3) 1 cosh(x) − cosh(y) × F α + β,α − β;α + ; 2 2cosh(x) Copyright © 2005 Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 2005:3 (2005) 329–348 DOI: 10.1155/IJMMS.2005.329 330 Hardy-type inequalities and F is the Gaussian hypergeometric function.
    [Show full text]
  • K-Weyl Fractional Integral I Introduction and Preliminaries
    Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 6, 2012, no. 34, 1685 - 1691 k-Weyl Fractional Integral Luis Guillermo Romero, Ruben Alejandro Cerutti and Gustavo Abel Dorrego Faculty of Exact Sciences National University of Nordeste. Avda. Libertad 5540 (3400) Corrientes, Argentina [email protected] [email protected] Abstract In this paper we present a generalization to the k-calculus of the Weyl Fractional Integral. Show the semigroup property and calculate their Fractional Fourier Transform. Mathematics Subject Classification: 26A33, 42A38 Keywords: k-Fractional Calculus. Weyl fractional integral I Introduction and Preliminaries In [1] Diaz and Pariguan has defined new functions called the k-Gamma function and the Pochhammer k-symbol that are generalization of the clas- sical Gamma function and the classical Pochhammer symbol. Later in 2012, Mubeen and Habibullah [11] has introduced the k-fractional integral of the Riemann-Liouville type. The purpose of this paper is introduce a fractional integral operator of Weyl type and study that may be posible to exprese this integral operator as certain convolution with the singular kernel of Riemann- Liouville. The classical Weyl integral operator of order α is defined (cf. [10]) in the form 1 ∞ W αf(u)= (t − u)α−1f(t)dt (I.1) Γ(α) u u ≥ 0, α>0 and f a function belonging to S(R) the Schwartzian space of functions, and Γ(z) is the Gamma Euler function given by the integral 1686 L. G. Romero, R. A. Cerutti and G. A. Dorrego ∞ Γ(z)= e−ttz−1dt, z ∈ C, Re(z) > 0, cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetostatics: Part 1 We Present Magnetostatics in Comparison with Electrostatics
    Magnetostatics: Part 1 We present magnetostatics in comparison with electrostatics. Sources of the fields: Electric field E: Coulomb’s law Magnetic field B: Biot-Savart law Forces exerted by the fields: Electric: F = qE Mind the notations, both Magnetic: F = qvB printed and hand‐written Does the magnetic force do any work to the charge? F B, F v Positive charge moving at v B Negative charge moving at v B Steady state: E = vB By measuring the polarity of the induced voltage, we can determine the sign of the moving charge. If the moving charge carriers is in a perfect conductor, then we can have an electric field inside the perfect conductor. Does this contradict what we have learned in electrostatics? Notice that the direction of the magnetic force is the same for both positive and negative charge carriers. Magnetic force on a current carrying wire The magnetic force is in the same direction regardless of the charge carrier sign. If the charge carrier is negative Carrier density Charge of each carrier For a small piece of the wire dl scalar Notice that v // dl A current-carrying wire in an external magnetic field feels the force exerted by the field. If the wire is not fixed, it will be moved by the magnetic force. Some work must be done. Does this contradict what we just said? For a wire from point A to point B, For a wire loop, If B is a constant all along the loop, because Let’s look at a rectangular wire loop in a uniform magnetic field B.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling of Ferrofluid Passive Cooling System
    Excerpt from the Proceedings of the COMSOL Conference 2010 Boston Modeling of Ferrofluid Passive Cooling System Mengfei Yang*,1,2, Robert O’Handley2 and Zhao Fang2,3 1M.I.T., 2Ferro Solutions, Inc, 3Penn. State Univ. *500 Memorial Dr, Cambridge, MA 02139, [email protected] Abstract: The simplicity of a ferrofluid-based was to develop a model that supports results passive cooling system makes it an appealing from experiments conducted on a cylindrical option for devices with limited space or other container of ferrofluid with a heat source and physical constraints. The cooling system sink [Figure 1]. consists of a permanent magnet and a ferrofluid. The experiments involved changing the Ferrofluids are composed of nanoscale volume of the ferrofluid and moving the magnet ferromagnetic particles with a temperature- to different positions outside the ferrofluid dependant magnetization suspended in a liquid container. These experiments tested 1) the effect solvent. The cool, magnetic ferrofluid near the of bringing the heat source and heat sink closer heat sink is attracted toward a magnet positioned together and using less ferrofluid, and 2) the near the heat source, thereby displacing the hot, optimal position for the permanent magnet paramagnetic ferrofluid near the heat source and between the heat source and sink. In the model, setting up convective cooling. This paper temperature-dependent magnetic properties were explores how COMSOL Multiphysics can be incorporated into the force component of the used to model a simple cylinder representation of momentum equation, which was coupled to the such a cooling system. Numerical results from heat transfer module. The model was compared the model displayed the same trends as empirical with experimental results for steady-state data from experiments conducted on the cylinder temperature trends and for appropriate velocity cooling system.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiplicity Formula and Stable Trace Formula 3
    MULTIPLICITY FORMULA AND STABLE TRACE FORMULA PENG ZHIFENG Abstract. Let G be a connected reductive group over Q. In this paper, we give the stabilization of the local trace formula. In particular, we construct the explicit form of the spectral side of the stable local trace formula in the Archimedean case, when one component of the test function is cuspidal. We also give the multiplicity formula for discrete series. At the same time, we obtain the stable version of L2-Lefschetz number formula. 1. Introduction Suppose that G is a connected reductive group over Q, and Γ is an arithmetic subgroup of G(R) defined by congruence conditions. Consider the regular representation R with G(R) acting on L2(Γ\G(R)) through the right translation. The fundamental problem is to decompose R into a direct sum of irreducible representations. In general, we decompose R into two parts R = Rdisc ⊕ Rcont, where Rdisc is the sum of discrete series, and Rcont is the continuous spectrum. The con- tinuous spectrum can be understood by Eisenstein series, which was studied by Langlands [23]. It suffices to study Rdisc. If πR ∈ Rdisc is an irreducible representation, we denote Rdisc(πR) for the πR-isotypical subspace of Rdisc. Then ⊕mdisc(πR) Rdisc(πR)= πR , where mdisc(πR) is the multiplicity. A classical problem is to find a finite summation formula for mdisc(πR). arXiv:1608.00055v3 [math.NT] 5 Jun 2018 If πR belongs to the square integrable discrete series, and Γ\G(R) is compact, then Langlands [21] gave a formula for mdisc(πR).
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Electromagnetism - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 6
    Classical electromagnetism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 6 Classical electromagnetism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Classical electrodynamics) Classical electromagnetism (or classical electrodynamics ) is a Electromagnetism branch of theoretical physics that studies consequences of the electromagnetic forces between electric charges and currents. It provides an excellent description of electromagnetic phenomena whenever the relevant length scales and field strengths are large enough that quantum mechanical effects are negligible (see quantum electrodynamics). Fundamental physical aspects of classical electrodynamics are presented e.g. by Feynman, Electricity · Magnetism Leighton and Sands, [1] Panofsky and Phillips, [2] and Jackson. [3] Electrostatics Electric charge · Coulomb's law · The theory of electromagnetism was developed over the course of the 19th century, most prominently by James Clerk Maxwell. For Electric field · Electric flux · a detailed historical account, consult Pauli, [4] Whittaker, [5] and Gauss's law · Electric potential · Pais. [6] See also History of optics, History of electromagnetism Electrostatic induction · and Maxwell's equations . Electric dipole moment · Polarization density Ribari č and Šušteršič[7] considered a dozen open questions in the current understanding of classical electrodynamics; to this end Magnetostatics they studied and cited about 240 references from 1903 to 1989. Ampère's law · Electric current · The outstanding problem with classical electrodynamics, as stated Magnetic field · Magnetization · [3] by Jackson, is that we are able to obtain and study relevant Magnetic flux · Biot–Savart law · solutions of its basic equations only in two limiting cases: »... one in which the sources of charges and currents are specified and the Magnetic dipole moment · resulting electromagnetic fields are calculated, and the other in Gauss's law for magnetism which external electromagnetic fields are specified and the Electrodynamics motion of charged particles or currents is calculated..
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Numerical Methods for Fractional Differential Equations
    Von der Carl-Friedrich-Gauß-Fakultat¨ fur¨ Mathematik und Informatik der Technischen Universitat¨ Braunschweig genehmigte Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) von Marc Weilbeer Efficient Numerical Methods for Fractional Differential Equations and their Analytical Background 1. Referent: Prof. Dr. Kai Diethelm 2. Referent: Prof. Dr. Neville J. Ford Eingereicht: 23.01.2005 Prufung:¨ 09.06.2005 Supported by the US Army Medical Research and Material Command Grant No. DAMD-17-01-1-0673 to the Cleveland Clinic Contents Introduction 1 1 A brief history of fractional calculus 7 1.1 The early stages 1695-1822 . 7 1.2 Abel's impact on fractional calculus 1823-1916 . 13 1.3 From Riesz and Weyl to modern fractional calculus . 18 2 Integer calculus 21 2.1 Integration and differentiation . 21 2.2 Differential equations and multistep methods . 26 3 Integral transforms and special functions 33 3.1 Integral transforms . 33 3.2 Euler's Gamma function . 35 3.3 The Beta function . 40 3.4 Mittag-Leffler function . 42 4 Fractional calculus 45 4.1 Fractional integration and differentiation . 45 4.1.1 Riemann-Liouville operator . 45 4.1.2 Caputo operator . 55 4.1.3 Grunw¨ ald-Letnikov operator . 60 4.2 Fractional differential equations . 65 4.2.1 Properties of the solution . 76 4.3 Fractional linear multistep methods . 83 5 Numerical methods 105 5.1 Fractional backward difference methods . 107 5.1.1 Backward differences and the Grunw¨ ald-Letnikov definition . 107 5.1.2 Diethelm's fractional backward differences based on quadrature .
    [Show full text]
  • Fields, Units, Magnetostatics
    Fields, Units, Magnetostatics European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected]) Institut N´eelCNRS-Universit´eGrenoble Alpes 10 octobre 2017 European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected])Fields, Units, Magnetostatics Motivation Magnetism is around us and magnetic materials are widely used Magnet Attraction (coins, fridge) Contactless Force (hand) Repulsive Force : Levitation Magnetic Energy - Mechanical Energy (Magnetic Gun) Magnetic Energy - Electrical Energy (Induction) Magnetic Liquids A device full of magnetic materials : the Hard Disk drive European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected])Fields, Units, Magnetostatics reminders Flat Disk Rotary Motor Write Head Voice Coil Linear Motor Read Head Discrete Components : Transformer Filter Inductor European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected])Fields, Units, Magnetostatics Magnetostatics How to describe Magnetic Matter ? How Magnetic Materials impact field maps, forces ? How to model them ? Here macroscopic, continous model Next lectures : Atomic magnetism, microscopic details (exchange mechanisms, spin-orbit, crystal field ...) European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected])Fields, Units, Magnetostatics Magnetostatics w/o magnets : Reminder Up to 1820, magnetism and electricity were two subjects not experimentally connected H.C. Oersted experiment (1820 - Copenhagen) European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected])Fields, Units, Magnetostatics Magnetostatics induction field B Looking for a mathematical expression Fields and forces created by an electrical circuit (C1, I) Elementary dB~ induction field created at M ~ ~ µ0I dl^u~ Biot and Savart law (1820) dB(M) = 4πr 2 European School on Magnetism Laurent Ranno ([email protected])Fields, Units, Magnetostatics Magnetostatics : Vocabulary µ I dl~ ^ u~ dB~ (M) = 0 4πr 2 B~ is the magnetic induction field ~ 1 1 B is a long-range vector field ( r 2 becomes r 3 for a closed circuit).
    [Show full text]
  • Lorentz-Violating Electrostatics and Magnetostatics
    Publications 10-1-2004 Lorentz-Violating Electrostatics and Magnetostatics Quentin G. Bailey Indiana University - Bloomington, [email protected] V. Alan Kostelecký Indiana University - Bloomington Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/publication Part of the Electromagnetics and Photonics Commons, and the Physics Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Bailey, Q. G., & Kostelecký, V. A. (2004). Lorentz-Violating Electrostatics and Magnetostatics. Physical Review D, 70(7). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.076006 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lorentz-Violating Electrostatics and Magnetostatics Quentin G. Bailey and V. Alan Kosteleck´y Physics Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, U.S.A. (Dated: IUHET 472, July 2004) The static limit of Lorentz-violating electrodynamics in vacuum and in media is investigated. Features of the general solutions include the need for unconventional boundary conditions and the mixing of electrostatic and magnetostatic effects. Explicit solutions are provided for some simple cases. Electromagnetostatics experiments show promise for improving existing sensitivities to parity- odd coefficients for Lorentz violation in the photon sector. I. INTRODUCTION electrodynamics in Minkowski spacetime, coupled to an arbitrary 4-current source. There exists a substantial Since its inception, relativity and its underlying theoretical literature discussing the electrodynamics limit Lorentz symmetry have been intimately linked to clas- of the SME [19], but the stationary limit remains unex- sical electrodynamics. A century after Einstein, high- plored to date. We begin by providing some general in- sensitivity experiments based on electromagnetic phe- formation about this theory, including some aspects as- nomena remain popular as tests of relativity.
    [Show full text]