DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Validation List Consultation Responses

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Validation List Consultation Responses Responses to the Buckinghamshire Council Local Validation List consultation The former councils in Buckinghamshire (Aylesbury Vale District Council, Buckinghamshire County Council, Chiltern District Council, South Bucks District Council and Wycombe District Council) consulted on the Local Validation List for Buckinghamshire Council between 2 – 16 March 2020. We received 12 responses in total. Below is a summary of the comments received and the agreed action resulting from those comments. If you have any questions on the Local Validation List or the consultation process, please email [email protected]. Table 1 Schedule of comments and responses to the Local Validation List Name Organisation (if Document / section Comment Agreed Action relevant) Information required is guesswork, Leave document as is - applicants won’t know what trial for 3 months and buildings are within 200m of the review site. Ecology and Trees Checklist It’s planning officer’s job to decide if trees / ecology is affected by proposal Matt Trotter MWT Architecture . A lot of work and additional cost for The rationale is to try and owners. ensure consistency across all the previous councils Needs assessing on each application and to simplify the list. It Site sections with negotiation with the agents is an attempt to try and once applications and received and provide certainty to the before they are validated. Validators documentation that would send applications back without be required to support and 1 Name Organisation (if Document / section Comment Agreed Action relevant) thinking about the real need for the application in the new document. Buckinghamshire Authority Why are these needed for all No changes – the applications (e.g. lean-to porch)? If document is not required the roof is complicated or difficult to for all applications understand then this can be Roof plans requested during the application, but applying to all adds unnecessary work for agents and extra cost to owners Unclear precisely what supporting See the comment about information is required for each the rationale for the new General application – provides officers with validation list a license to demand whatever they want Current inconsistent practices with Use the statutory certificates (e.g. demanded notice definition. Adrian ACH Planning be given to someone holding ‘right of way’ as an owner / give notice to With highway matters the highway authority as an ‘owner’ highway authority is an Ownership certificates because application related to a owner. new access to highway. Need confirmation on what is considered ‘owner’ Unsure whether requirements vary See the comment about Neil Cottrell CALA General across local areas the rationale for the new validation list Commissioner Schools Will Buckinghamshire Council be Internal practice not a Paula Campbell- – Buckinghamshire General considering outline applications and validation issue Balcome County Council appeals for schools? 2 Name Organisation (if Document / section Comment Agreed Action relevant) Are schools exempt from CIL? Each CIL scheme is different. CIL additional questions Ensure appropriate CIL documents are set out on page for referral. Internal sections through a property Agreed. New document where floor levels being altered, or added to Local Validation changes in make up to ceiling or List. *New document* Chiltern and South floors or timber frames Bucks District Council (Principal LBC applications only Matthew Crook Conservation and Internal elevations to show how Agreed. New document Listed Buildings alterations will appear / be formed added to Local Validation Officer) on site when viewed on the inside List. *New document* of a property LBC applications only Validation should be thoroughly and See the comment about General properly overseen by a professional. the rationale for the new validation list Should state how planning policies Add bullet point: Design and Access are met, not just on access (some - Can state how Statement applicants address this in planning planning policies Beaconsfield Town statements) are met Patrick Hogan Council Should be a requirement of all Add text to ‘there may be Sections / levels applications (especially in hilly areas other proposals where we e.g. High Wycombe) ask this form you’ Should be a requirement of all Add bullet point applications (especially in hilly areas - Show relative Elevations e.g. High Wycombe) to show heights / levels in relative heights/levels in street street context 3 Name Organisation (if Document / section Comment Agreed Action relevant) context (where relevant, e.g. hilly areas) Definition of ‘non-material The Validation List is not General amendment’ should be made clear the appropriate location as is currently open to abuse for such a definition. Need to agree when this list will be List will apply for all new introduced: is it all applications applications received from received on 1 April onwards? Or are 1 April. applications submitted before 1 General April but validated after 1 April All backdated applications going to use the new list? will use previous versions of Lists specific to the individual Councils Definitions of major / minor are Change text to statutory more complicated in light of recent definition. legal case with C&SB. NPPF has broader definitions but The Town & Chiltern and South Country Planning (General Bucks (Team Leader – Daniel Gigg Management Procedure) (England) Strategic Sites and Order 2015 (as amended) is Specialists) different. Definition of minor / Suggested amendments: major / householder Minor – ‘under 1000 sqm’ (all floorspace including resi) ‘below 1ha) (whole site, any development including resi) Major – - 0.5ha (where number of dwellings isn’t specified) 4 Name Organisation (if Document / section Comment Agreed Action relevant) - 1000 sqm (any building, including residential), e.g. 9 dwellings over 1100 sq m would be major - 1ha (all development), e.g. 9 dwellings on a site of 1ha would be major Should list of applications include No changes proposed ‘Reserved matters’ and ‘variation / removal of conditions’? For other applications customers No changes proposed General were advised to see the checklist that is at the end of the standard application form for that application type. On guide to completion. Should Q6 Make change to Q6. Application form say ‘trees on site as well as those within falling distance’ Chiltern and South Potentially misleading, disparity Make change. Bucks District Council Jeanette Collins between Application Form guidance (Senior Improvement / Ownership certificate entry. Officer) Change to: A sole owner Ownership certificates B EITHER not the owner but know who is OR they are not the sole owner but they know who the other owners are C EITHER not the owner but they 5 Name Organisation (if Document / section Comment Agreed Action relevant) know some of the other owners OR they are an owner but only know some of the other owners D EITHER not the owner and don’t know who is the owner(s) OR they are an owner but don’t know any other owner(s) Existing and proposed Should this say this is a national and Fully considered but no elevations local requirement, not just local? change required Gross floor area put under ‘Dos’ but New document to be Floor plans CSB currently require this as a new created (see below) document. Is there value in this? New dwellings schedule. New document added to Local Validation List. Where the proposal involves new dwellinghouses or flats, give floor area in sqm of internal and external gross floor space to be provided for all floors including basements for each dwelling unit and an overall *New document* total for all new dwelling units proposed Our reasoning for requiring this information is that applicant has appropriately identified the floor space for fee calculation and CIL liability, as well as whether their proposal falls within major category or not. 6 Name Organisation (if Document / section Comment Agreed Action relevant) Does this require ‘critical drainage’ Add text to ‘there may be SuDS Statement areas in South Bucks? other proposals where we ask this form you’ Waste and recycling Is this a national or local Noted. Change to ‘local strategy requirement? Currently missing. requirement’. Says needed on ALL LBC There is a need to ensure applications. Not part of national consistency in approach Design and Access requirement, just major and therefore no change Statement conservation area. Suggest adding proposed. ‘local’ if that is the case. CSB currently use an Affordable New document added to Housing Form. Local Validation List. Suggested criteria: Requirements will be local area affordable housing 5 or more self-contained homes in thresholds. an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and/or · 10 or more self-contained homes and/or *New document* · Site area is 0.5 hectares or more. There may be sites that are capable of providing 10 or more homes, where the requirement may apply. These will be identified on an individual basis and the applicant advised accordingly. This was an IMPORTANT inclusion in our local list when we did it last 7 Name Organisation (if Document / section Comment Agreed Action relevant) year. Not sure if this has been discussed and dismissed or is covered somewhere that I didn’t spot. Do we still want to have this, maybe a Chiltern/South Bucks only one? Email includes suggested form and text. Hydrology Report, already on radar New document added to but requires GIS extent. Local Validation List. ‘Applications within 500 metres
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 13742 the London Gazette, Ist November 1977 Home Office
    13742 THE LONDON GAZETTE, IST NOVEMBER 1977 CONSULTATIVE DOCUMENTS Black Notley Parish Council and People. Bleasby, People of COM(77) 483 FINAL Bletchingley Women's Institute. R/2347/77. Commission communication to the Council on Blockley Parish Council. the energy situation in the Community and in the world. Borley, People of Boughton Aluph and Eastwell, People of COMMISSION DOCUMENT DEPOSITED SEPARATELY Boys' Brigade. R/2131/77. Letter of amendment to the preliminary draft Brackley, People of general budget of the European Communities for 1978. Bracknell Development Corporation. Bracknell District Council. COM(77) 467 FINAL Braintree District Council and People. R/2361/77. Report from the Commission to the Council on Braunstone, People of the application to exported products of Council Regula- Breadsall, People of tion (EEC) No. 2967/76 laying down common standards Brighton Corporation. for the water content of frozen and deep-frozen chickens, British Association of Accountants and Auditors. hens and cocks. British Bottlers Institute. British Constitution Defence.Committee (Liverpool). COM(77) 443 FINAL British Dental Association. R/2355/77. Commission communication to the Council on 'British Medical Association. improving co-ordination of national economic policies. British Optical Association. COM(77) 473 FINAL British Railways Board. Bromesberrow Parish Council. R/23 87/77. Report on the opening, allocation and manage- Bromley Corporation. ment of the Community tariff quota in 1977 for frozen Brook, Milford Sandhills, Witley and Wormley, People of beef and veal. Broxtowe District Council. COM(77) 494 FINAL Buckingham Town Council. R/2473/77. Annual Report on the economic situation in the Burnham-on-Sea and Highbridge Town Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Sampson Toovey and Katherine Shrimpton of Amersham
    DESCENDANTS OF SAMPSON TOOVEY AND KATHERINE SHRIMPTON OF AMERSHAM January 2017, revised August 2017 1 PREFACE This research was undertaken at the request of the Curator of Amersham Museum, Emily Toettcher, who wanted information about the Toovey family members who had lived in the building that now houses the museum. It was very soon apparent that much investigation had already been carried out. The trigger- factor was probably the death of Ronald Frank Toovey on 14 August 1980 in Wycombe Hospital. He was the last survivor of the four children of Frederick Samson Toovey and Sarah Ann Clare. He was unmarried, childless and intestate and, although his solicitors twice attended to try to get a Will drawn, it was too late. The solicitors commissioned a genealogist to act as heir hunter and eventually heirs were identified and the estate distributed. This seems to have generated interest in their ancestry among the descendants of Ronald Frank’s grandfather Henry Toovey (1822-1910). At that time there was considerable interest also in exploring the capabilities of computers for storing and analysing genealogical data. The Toovey family featured in an article in Computers in Genealogy in March 1993 1. In 1995 Richard Boyles wrote Toovey’s in Amersham, My Family History and kindly presented a copy to Amersham Museum. While carrying out this research he became aware of Dr DW Jopling who two years later would publish The Descendants of Toovey of Watlington, born ca 1540. A copy of this, accompanied by a roll pedigree, is in the Library of the Society of Genealogists in London.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Local Plan Consultation June-August 2016: Responses Summary
    Statement of Consultation - Appendix 15 Wycombe District Local Plan Draft Local Plan Summary of responses to consultation – June-August 2016 (March 2017) Draft Local Plan Core Policies Summary of responses to consultation – June-August 2016 Table of contents Introduction Sections............................................................................................................. 2 Visions and Strategic Objectives ........................................................................................... 4 Core Policy: CP1 – Sustainable Development....................................................................... 9 Core Policy: CP2 – Spatial Strategy .................................................................................... 11 Core Policy: CP3 – Settlement Hierarchy ............................................................................ 17 Core Policy: CP4 – Delivering homes ................................................................................. 20 Core Policy: CP5 – Delivering land for Business ................................................................. 33 Core Policy: CP6 – Securing vibrant and high quality Town Centres ................................... 36 Core Policy: CP7 – Delivering the infrastructure to support growth ..................................... 38 Core Policy: CP8 – Sense of Place ..................................................................................... 46 Core Policy: CP9 – Protecting the Green Belt ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey Appendix: South Bucks District
    Ancient Woodland Inventory for the Chilterns Appendix - South Bucks District Chiltern Woodlands CONSERVATION BOARD Project Chiltern District Council WYCOMBE DISTRICT COUNCIL an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty 1. Introduction his appendix summarises results from the Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey for the whole of South Bucks District in the County of Buckinghamshire (see map 1 for details). For more information on the project and Tits methodology, please refer to the main report, 1which can be downloaded from www.chilternsaonb.org The Chilterns Ancient Woodland Survey area includes parts of Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire and Oxfordshire. The extent of the project area included, but was not confined to, the Chilterns Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). 2 The work follows on from previous revisions in the South East. The Chilterns survey was hosted by the Chilterns Conservation Board with support from the Chiltern Woodlands Project, Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre (TVERC) and Surrey Biodiversity Information Centre (SBIC). The work was funded by Buckinghamshire County Council, Chilterns Conservation Board, Chiltern District Council, Dacorum Borough Council, Forestry Commission, Hertfordshire County Council, Natural England and Wycombe District Council. Map 1: Project aims The Survey Area, showing Local Authority areas covered and the Chilterns AONB The primary aim of the County Boundaries survey was to revise and Chilterns AONB update the Ancient Entire Districts Woodland Inventory and Chiltern District
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The
    STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2004 No. 3211 LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENGLAND The Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No. 2) Order 2004 Made - - - - 6th December 2004 Laid before Parliament 10th December 2004 Coming into force - - 31st December 2004 The First Secretary of State, having received a report from the Audit Commission(a) produced under section 99(1) of the Local Government Act 2003(b), in exercise of the powers conferred upon him by section 99(4) of that Act, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and application 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Local Authorities (Categorisation) (England) (No.2) Order 2004 and shall come into force on 31st December 2004. (2) This Order applies in relation to English local authorities(c). Categorisation report 2. The English local authorities, to which the report of the Audit Commission dated 8th November 2004 relates, are, by this Order, categorised in accordance with their categorisation in that report. Excellent authorities 3. The local authorities listed in Schedule 1 to this Order are categorised as excellent. Good authorities 4. The local authorities listed in Schedule 2 to this Order are categorised as good. Fair authorities 5. The local authorities listed in Schedule 3 to this Order are categorised as fair. (a) For the definition of “the Audit Commission”, see section 99(7) of the Local Government Act 2003. (b) 2003 c.26. The report of the Audit Commission consists of a letter from the Chief Executive of the Audit Commission to the Minister for Local and Regional Government dated 8th November 2004 with the attached list of local authorities categorised by the Audit Commission as of that date.
    [Show full text]
  • Town and Parish Councils in Aylesbury, Chiltern, South Bucks and Wycombe District Council Areas
    Town and Parish Councils in Aylesbury, Chiltern, South Bucks and Wycombe District Council areas. Dear Town or Parish Council, Creation of Parish Charter You will no doubt be aware that contrary to published expectations there was no announcement from DCLG about a reorganisation of local government in Buckinghamshire in March. We have now been informed that, in the light of the General Election, the current government will make no decision in relation to the unitary question. There will need to be a formal consideration of the submissions that have been made by the new government. Whilst we are disappointed that this Government has not yet announced support for our proposals, we remain confident that a new Government will recognise the merits of the District Council proposal and create two new unitaries in Buckinghamshire. In the meantime you will be aware that the County Council has launched an online survey for anyone to indicate their views and express support for their preferred unitary option. Obviously we welcome your support in completing the survey in favour of two unitaries and the District proposal but recognise that surveys are not everyone’s cup of tea and it is very much up to you. The link is below if you would like to do so. http://futurebucks.co.uk/yourviews/ In the meantime we are keen to ensure that we do not lose momentum in taking forward some of the ideas in our proposals which we feel do not require a decision from government. In particular we suggested that a Town and Parish Charter would enable us to develop an understanding with parishes about how we want to work together moving forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Coverage and Outreach
    Global Carbon Project – Future Earth Carbon Budget 2017 Published 13 November 2017 Coverage and Outreach News agency promo-poster in Melbourne, Australia, 14 Nov. 2017 This document gives an overview of the coverage and outreach of the Global Carbon Budget 2017 release and associated publications and activities. It is intended to inform the team on how their work was reported and perceived worldwide. It is not exhaustive but still provides much detail to guide future outreach efforts. PRODUCTS 13 NOV 2018 1. Three papers (ESSD-CorinneL, NatureCC-GlenP, ERL-RobJ) 2. Data and ppt 3. GCP carbon budget webpage updates 4. Global Carbon Atlas updates 5. One Infographic 6. One Video (English, Spanish) 7. Two blogs (The Conversation-Pep, CarbonBrief-Glen) 8. Seven press releases (UEA, CICERO, Stanford University, CSIR-South Africa, China-Fundan University, Future Earth, European Climate Foundation) 9. Multiple Twitter and Facebook feeds. 10. Key Messages document (internal) SUMMARY OF COVERAGE AND OUTREACH • Media outlet coverage within the first week after publication (print and online; based on Meltwater searches on “Global Carbon Project”, “Global Carbon Budget”, “Global Carbon Budget 2017” and “2017 Global Carbon Budget” run by European Climate Foundation): Global coverage in 99 countries with a total of 2,792 media items (this count doesn’t include UK media), in 27 different languages. • OECD dominates coverage (particularly USA, UK, France, Germany, Canada, and Australia), but almost equally large coverage in China, India and Brazil (a great leap forward over previous years). South east Asia and Central/South America (except Brazil) some coverage too. Key to this success was working for the first time with the Climate Change Foundation facilitated by Future Earth (Owen, Alistair).
    [Show full text]
  • Options for Local Governance in High Wycombe Consultation Document
    Options for local governance in High Wycombe Consultation document Published August 2019 This document tells you about important options for the future of local government in the High Wycombe area. It explains how local government in Buckinghamshire is organised now and tells you about important changes happening in April 2020. Above all, it asks your opinions about how best to represent the interests of the High Wycombe area. For more information, please consult the website at www.wycombe.gov.uk/highwycombecgr and give your views by completing a questionnaire online or on paper, and/or by sending a letter or email to the address given at the end of this document. The consultation is being conducted by Wycombe District Council and they have appointed ORS (a specialist social research practice) to analyse responses and report the findings fully and objectively. Why consult us? Haven’t you already made up your mind? Wycombe District Council has not made up its mind about how best to represent the interests of the town under the new local government system to be introduced in 2020, and it genuinely wants to know your views before it makes any recommendations. The consultation will run from 5 August 5 to 30 September 2019 and the Council will consider the findings before making recommendations in November 2019. How does local government work now in Buckinghamshire? Like many other parts of England, Buckinghamshire currently has two main tiers of local government which are: Buckinghamshire County Council that provides county-wide strategic services, such as adult and children’s social care, educational services, highways and environmental services Four district councils (Aylesbury Vale, Chiltern, South Bucks, and Wycombe) that each provide a wide range of local services, such as waste collection, local planning and building regulations, housing advice, licensing, benefits, council tax collection, community safety, car parks, and community centres and parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequalities in Britain, Sociology Review, 21, 1, 15-19
    Dorling, D. and Thomas, B. (2011) Mapping Inequalities in Britain, Sociology Review, 21, 1, 15-19. Inequalities in Britain Danny Dorling and Bethan Thomas This paper draws on three of the key topics we discuss in our new atlas, Bankrupt Britain: An atlas of social change (Dorling and Thomas 2011). 1. Public sector cuts: local and national implications In June 2010 the Department for Communities and Local Government published what is likely to become one of the most infamous documents of the economic recession, titled Local government contribution to efficiencies in 2010/11 (DCLG 2010). This document set out what many have argued are some of the most unfairly distributed cuts ever to be imposed on local government in England. The poor and the poorest areas of the country appeared to have been targeted to receive the deepest and most sustained cuts. This mirrored the effects of the national budget of that month that was also found, on examination by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (2010), to be highly regressive (taking more from the poor as a proportion of their income than from the rich). It may well not have been a coincidence that almost all of the areas to suffer the greatest service cuts contained a large majority of people who had voted against the two parties that had come to form the new coalition government. Map 1 shows where the main cuts will, from April 2011, hit most, least, and not at all. These are the first relatively modest local government cuts, of 'just' £6 billion. However, not a penny of that £6 billion is to be saved by the citizens of generally well-heeled districts such as Chiltern, South Bucks, most of Devon, Christchurch, most of Dorset, Cheltenham, the Cotswolds, Winchester, Broxbourne, most of Hertfordshire, Tunbridge Wells, Harrogate, most of Oxfordshire (but not Oxford), all of Surrey, the Malvern Hills and another hundred or so generally 'leafy' and mostly 'Tory' or 'Liberal Democrat' areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Planning in Buckinghamshire
    Biodiversity and Planning in Buckinghamshire Version 2. March 2014 Contents Section 1 1a About this guidance ......................................................................................................................3 WHO IS THIS Protecting and enhancing Buckinghamshire’s biodiversity ...............................3 How to use this guidance ................................................................................................3 GUIDANCE FOR? 1b Biodiversity in the planning process .......................................................................................4 This guidance should be helpful if 1c Information requirements ...........................................................................................................5 you are: Section 2 n a planning officer in either 2a Internationally and nationally designated sites ..................................................................6 policy or development 2b Legally protected species ............................................................................................................8 management; Section 3 n writing a Neighbourhood Plan; 3 Local sites and priority habitats and species ........................................................................11 3a Local Sites ..........................................................................................................................................12 n going to be submitting a 3b Irreplaceable Habitats ...................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • A Report Produced for Department of the Environment Transport and The
    Final Identifying the Options Available for Determining Population Data and Identifying Agglomerations in Connection with EU Proposals Regarding Environmental Noise A report produced for Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, The Scottish Executive, The National Assembly for Wales and Department of Environment for Northern Ireland Katie King Tony Bush January 2001 Final Identifying the Options Available for Determining Population Data and Identifying Agglomerations in Connection with EU Proposals Regarding Environmental Noise A report produced for Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, The Scottish Executive, The National Assembly for Wales and Department of Environment for Northern Ireland Katie King Tony Bush January 2001 Final Title Identifying the Options Available for Determining Population Data and Identifying Agglomerations in Connection with EU Proposals Regarding Environmental Noise Customer Department of the Environment Transport and the Regions, The Scottish Executive, The National Assembly for Wales and Department of Environment for Northern Ireland Customer reference Confidentiality, copyright and reproduction File reference \\151.182.168.37\kk\noise\ed50035\final report\final report 15-2.doc Report number AEAT/ENV/R/0461 (Final) Report status Final AEA Technology E5 Culham Abingdon Oxfordshire, OX14 3ED Telephone 01235 463715 Facsimile 01235 463574 AEA Technology is the trading name of AEA Technology plc AEA Technology is certificated to BS EN ISO9001:(1994) Name Signature Date Author Katie King Tony Bush Reviewed by Tony Bush Approved by John Stedman The maps included in this report have been generated by AEA Technology using OS maps on behalf of DETR with permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of The Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands CSP Partnership Chair/Chief Exec Partnership Community Website Facebook Twitter Safety Manager Amber Valley CSP Cllr
    East Midlands CSP Partnership Chair/Chief Exec Partnership Community Website Facebook Twitter Safety Manager Amber Valley CSP Cllr. Jack Brown Sally Price www.ambervalley.gov PO Box 18 [email protected] sally.price@ambervalley. .uk Town Hall v.uk gov.uk Ripley 01773 841652 01773 841652 Derbyshire DE5 3SZ Ashfield CSP 0300 300 99 99 Ext 3000 Rebecca Whitehead www.ashfield- Council Offices r.whitehead@ashfield- dc.gov.uk Urban Road dc.gov.uk Kirkby in Ashfield 01623457349 Nottinghamshire NG17 8DA Bassetlaw, Newark and Andrew Muter Gerald Connor www.bassetlaw.gov.u Sherwood CSP [email protected] gerald.connor@bassetla k Kelham Hall 01636655200 w.gov.uk www.newark- Kelham 01909 533153 sherwooddc.gov.uk Newark Lisa Lancaster Nottinghamshire [email protected] NG23 5QX 01636655232 Blaby CSP Cllr Karl Coles [email protected] Council Offices [email protected] 0116 275 0555 Desford Road Narborough Leicestershire - LE19 2DF Bolsover CSP Cllr. Brian Murray-Carr Jo Selby www.bolsover.gov.uk Sherwood Lodge Brian.Murray- [email protected] /community- Bolsover [email protected] k safety.partnership Derbyshire 01246 242 535 01246 242217 S44 6NF Boston CSP Cllr Stephen Woodliffe Peter Hunn Municipal Buildings [email protected] [email protected]. West Street k uk Boston 07876086570 01205 314 245 Lincolnshire PE21 8QR Charnwood CSP Cllr. David Snartt Julie Robinson Council Offices [email protected] Julie.robinson@charnwo Southfield Road v.uk od.gov.uk Loughborough 01533244408 01509634590 Leicestershire LE11 2TR Chesterfield CSP Sharon Blank Joe Tomlinson www.saferderbyshire.
    [Show full text]