DOCSLIB.ORG

SIR 2021-5017: Landscape Evolution in Eastern Chuckwalla Valley

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management Landscape Evolution in Eastern Chuckwalla Valley, Riverside County, California Scientific Investigations Report 2021–5017 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. U.S. Geological Survey photograph of wind-rippled sand and sand verbena in eastern Chuckwalla Valley, Riverside County, California. Landscape Evolution in Eastern Chuckwalla Valley, Riverside County, California By Amy E. East, Harrison J. Gray, Margaret Hiza Redsteer, and Matthew Ballmer Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management Scientific Investigations Report 2021–5017 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2021 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: East, A.E., Gray, H.J., Redsteer, M.H., and Ballmer, M., 2021, Landscape evolution in eastern Chuckwalla Valley, Riverside County, California: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2021–5017, 46 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215017. Associated data for this publication: Gray, H.J., and East, A.E., 2021, Luminescence, weather, and grain-size data from eastern Chuckwalla Valley, Riverside County, California: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9LZ02E4. ISSN 2328-0328 (online) iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Objectives...............................................................................................................................................3 Field Setting and Previous Work ........................................................................................................3 Methods...........................................................................................................................................................5 Weather Monitoring and Sand-Transport Modeling ......................................................................5 Surficial Sediment Characterization ..................................................................................................6 Stratigraphic Analysis and Luminescence Dating ..........................................................................7 Results .............................................................................................................................................................7 Weather and Sand-Transport Modeling ...........................................................................................7 Surficial Sediment Characterization ................................................................................................14 Stratigraphy and Luminescence Dating .........................................................................................27 Discussion .....................................................................................................................................................38 Conclusions...................................................................................................................................................40 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................40 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................40 Figures 1. Maps of the study area in Chuckwalla Valley, eastern Riverside County, California ...........2 2. Photograph of a weather station deployed in eastern Chuckwalla Valley on February 7, 2019 .............................................................................................................................5 3. Graphs of wind speed and maximum gust speed for the study duration beginning on February 7, 2019, and ending December 21, 2020 ....................................................................8 4. Graphs of air temperature measured using the sensor mounted on the main weather-station and a sensor within the aluminum tipping-bucket rain gage ....................9 5. Graphs of relative humidity and cumulative rainfall during the study interval ................10 6. Polar plots of wind speed and wind direction for each month of 2019 .............................11 7. Polar plots of wind speed and wind direction for each month of 2020 .............................12 8. Histograms of 4-minute average wind-speed measurements for the entire study duration ..............................................................................................................................13 9. Photographs and polar plot showing evidence of a strong wind event October 30–31, 2019 ....................................................................................................................14 10. Graphs of wind speed, modeled sand flux, and cumulative modeled sand flux for the duration of the study ..................................................................................................................15 11. Wind-rose histogram of modeled sand flux showing frequency by direction .................16 12. Photographs of the land surface in polygon 1 and graph of grain-size for samples collected from polygon 1 in February 2019 .............................................................................17 13. Photographs of the land surface in polygon 2 and graph of grain-size for samples collected from polygon 2 in February 2019 .............................................................................18 14. Photographs of the land surface in polygon 3 and graph of grain-size for samples collected from polygon 3 in February 2019 .............................................................................20 15. Photographs of the land surface in polygon 4 and graph of grain-size for samples collected from polygon 4 in February 2019 .............................................................................21 iv 16. Photographs of the land surface in polygon 5 and graph of grain-size for samples collected from polygon 5 in February 2019 .............................................................................22 17. Photographs of the land surface in polygon 6 and graph of grain-size for samples collected from polygon 6 in February 2019 .............................................................................23 18. Photographs of the ephemeral stream channel Wiley Well wash, at the location immediately west of polygon 6, facing upstream, taken February 6, 2019 ........................24 19. Photographs of the land surface in polygon 7 and graph of grain-size for samples collected from polygon 7 in February 2019 .............................................................................25 20. Photographs of the land surface in polygon 8 and graph of grain-size for samples collected from polygon 8 in February 2019 .............................................................................26 21. Photographs of the land surface in the southeast side of the Palen dune field and graph of grain-size for samples collected from the southeastern part of the Palen dune field in February 2019 ................................................................................................................................28 22. Stratigraphic columns of five pits excavated in Chuckwalla Valley in March 2020 ........29 23. Stratigraphic column, photographs, and grain-size graph showing data collected from pit 1, excavated in March 2020 ................................................................................................... 30 24. Stratigraphic column, photographs, and grain-size graph showing data collected from pit 2, excavated in March 2020 ..................................................................................................32 25. Stratigraphic column, photographs, and grain-size graph showing data collected from pit 3, excavated in March 2020 ..................................................................................................34 26. Stratigraphic column, photographs, and grain-size graph showing data collected from pit 202, excavated in March 2020 ..............................................................................................36 27. Stratigraphic column, photographs, and grain-size graph showing data collected from pit 4, excavated in March 2020 ..................................................................................................37 Tables 1. Sediment-transport equations used to model aeolian sand flux ..........................................6 2. Vector sums of wind speed
Recommended publications
  • Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental

    Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental

    Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline Environmental Assessment and Proposed California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment BLM Case File No. CACA-054096 BLM-DOI-CA-D060-2016-0017-EA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April 2017 USDOI Bureau of Land Management April 2017Page 2 Eagle Crest Energy Gen-Tie and Water Pipeline EA and Proposed CDCA Plan Amendment United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT California Desert District 22835 Calle San Juan De Los Lagos Moreno Valley, CA 92553 April XX, 2017 Dear Reader: The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has finalized the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the proposed right-of-way (ROW) and associated California Desert Conservation Area Plan (CDCA) Plan Amendment (PA) for the Eagle Crest Energy Gen- Tie and Water Supply Pipeline (Proposed Action), located in eastern Riverside County, California. The Proposed Action is part of a larger project, the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project (FERC Project), licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in 2014. The BLM is issuing a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) on the Proposed Action. The FERC Project would be located on approximately 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land and approximately 1,377 acres of private land. Of the 1,150 acres of BLM-managed land, 507 acres are in the 16-mile gen-tie line alignment; 154 acres are in the water supply pipeline alignment and other Proposed Action facilities outside the Central Project Area; and approximately 489 acres are lands within the Central Project Area of the hydropower project.
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP

    California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP

    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
  • A Review of Lake Frome & Strzelecki Regional Reserves 1991-2001

    A Review of Lake Frome & Strzelecki Regional Reserves 1991-2001

    A Review of Lake Frome and Strzelecki Regional Reserves 1991 – 2001 s & ark W P il l d a l i f n e o i t a N South Australia A Review of Lake Frome and Strzelecki Regional Reserves 1991 – 2001 Strzelecki Regional Reserves Lake Frome This review has been prepared and adopted in pursuance to section 34A of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972. Published by the Department for Environment and Heritage Adelaide, South Australia July 2002 © Department for Environment and Heritage ISBN: 0 7590 1038 2 Prepared by Outback Region National Parks & Wildlife SA Department for Environment and Heritage Front cover photographs: Lake Frome coastline, Lake Frome Regional Reserve, supplied by R Playfair and reproduced with permission. Montecollina Bore, Strzelecki Regional Reserve, supplied by C. Crafter and reproduced with permission. Department for Environment and Heritage TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES..................................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF ACRONYMS and ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................................iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ......................................................................................................................................iv FOREWORD ..........................................................................................................................................................
  • Beolobical Survey

    Beolobical Survey

    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BEOLOBICAL SURVEY Generalized geologic map of the Big Maria Mountains region, northeastern Riverside County, southeastern California by Warren Hamilton* Open-File Report 84-407 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature 1984 *Denver, Colorado MAP EXPLANATION SURFICIAL MATERIALS Quaternary Qa Alluvium, mostly silt and sand, of modern Hoiocene Colorado River floodplain. Pleistocene Qe Eolian sand. Tertiary Of Fanglomerate and alluvium, mostly of local PIi ocene origin and of diverse Quaternary ages. Includes algal travertine and brackish-water strata of Bouse Formation of Pliocene age along east and south sides of Big Maria and Riverside Mountains, Fanglomerate may locally be as old as Pliocene. MIOCENE INTRUSIVE ROCKS Tertiary In Riverside Mountains, dikes of 1 e u c o r h y o 1 i t e Miocene intruded along detachment fault. In northern Big Maria Mountains, plugs and dikes of hornbl ende-bi at i te and bioti te-hornbl ende rhyodacite and quartz latite. These predate steep normal faults, and may include rocks both older and younger than low-angle detachment faults. Two hornblende K-Ar determinations by' Donna L. Martin yield calculated ages of 10. 1 ±4.5 and' 21.7 + 2 m.y ROCKS ABOVE DETACHMENT FAULTS ROCKS DEPOSITED SYNCHRONOUSLY WITH EXTENSIONAL FAULTING L o w e r Tob Slide breccias, partly monolithologic, and Mi ocene Jos extremely coarse fanglomerate. or upper Tos Fluvial and lacustrine strata, mostly red. 01i gocene Tob T o v Calc-alkalic volcanic rocks: quartz latitic ignimbrite, and altered dacitic and andesitic flow rocks.
  • New Record of Dust Input and Provenance During Glacial Periods in Western Australia Shelf (IODP Expedition 356, Site U1461) from the Middle to Late Pleistocene

    New Record of Dust Input and Provenance During Glacial Periods in Western Australia Shelf (IODP Expedition 356, Site U1461) from the Middle to Late Pleistocene

    atmosphere Article New Record of Dust Input and Provenance during Glacial Periods in Western Australia Shelf (IODP Expedition 356, Site U1461) from the Middle to Late Pleistocene Margot Courtillat 1,2,* , Maximilian Hallenberger 3 , Maria-Angela Bassetti 1,2, Dominique Aubert 1,2 , Catherine Jeandel 4, Lars Reuning 5 , Chelsea Korpanty 6 , Pierre Moissette 7,8 , Stéphanie Mounic 9 and Mariem Saavedra-Pellitero 10,11 1 Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens, Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, UMR 5110, 52 Avenue Paul Alduy, CEDEX, F-66860 Perpignan, France; [email protected] (M.-A.B.); [email protected] (D.A.) 2 CNRS, Centre de Formation et de Recherche sur les Environnements Méditerranéens, UMR 5110, 52 Avenue Paul Alduy, CEDEX, F-66860 Perpignan, France 3 Energy & Mineral Resources Group, Geological Institute Wüllnerstr. 2, RWTH Aachen University, 52052 Aachen, Germany; [email protected] 4 Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, LEGOS (Université de Toulouse, CNRS/CNES/IRD/UPS), 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France; [email protected] 5 Institute of Geosciences, CAU Kiel, Ludewig-Meyn-Straße 10, 24118 Kiel, Germany; [email protected] 6 MARUM Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Leobener Str. 8, 28359 Bremen, Germany; [email protected] 7 Department of Historical Geology & Palaeontology, Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15784 Athens, Greece; [email protected]
  • Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Draft License Application Exhibit E, Volume 1, Public Information Palm Desert, California

    Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Draft License Application Exhibit E, Volume 1, Public Information Palm Desert, California

    Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Draft License Application Exhibit E, Volume 1, Public Information Palm Desert, California Submitted to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Submitted by: Eagle Crest Energy Company Date: June 16, 2008 Project No. 080470 ©2008 Eagle Crest Energy DRAFT LICENSE APPLICATION- EXHIBIT E Table of Contents 1 General Description 1-1 1.1 Project Description 1-1 1.2 Project Area 1-2 1.2.1 Existing Land Use 1-4 1.3 Compatibility with Landfill Project 1-5 1.3.1 Land Exchange 1-5 1.3.2 Landfill Operations 1-6 1.3.3 Landfill Permitting 1-6 1.3.4 Compatibility of Specific Features 1-7 1.3.4.1 Potential Seepage Issues 1-8 1.3.4.2 Ancillary Facilities Interferences 1-9 2 Water Use and Quality 2-1 2.1 Surface Waters 2-1 2.1.1 Instream Flow Uses of Streams 2-1 2.1.2 Water quality of surface water 2-1 2.1.3 Existing lakes and reservoirs 2-1 2.1.4 Impacts of Construction and Operation 2-1 2.1.5 Measures recommended by Federal and state agencies to protect surface water 2-1 2.2 Description of Existing Groundwater 2-1 2.2.1 Springs and Wells 2-3 2.2.2 Water Bearing Formations 2-3 2.2.3 Hydraulic Characteristics 2-4 2.2.4 Groundwater Levels 2-5 2.2.5 Groundwater Flow Direction 2-6 2.2.6 Groundwater Storage 2-7 2.2.7 Groundwater Pumping 2-7 2.2.8 Recharge Sources 2-8 2.2.9 Outflow 2-9 2.2.10 Perennial Yield 2-9 2.3 Potential Impacts to Groundwater Supply 2-9 2.3.1 Proposed Project Water Supply 2-9 2.3.2 Perennial Yield 2-10 2.3.3 Regional Groundwater Level Effects 2-12 2.3.4 Local Groundwater Level Effects 2-15 2.3.5 Groundwater
  • Biological Goals and Objectives

    Biological Goals and Objectives

    Appendix C Biological Goals and Objectives Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX C. BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C.1 Process for Developing the Biological Goals and Objectives This section outlines the process for drafting the Biological Goals and Objectives (BGOs) and describes how they inform the conservation strategy for the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP or Plan). The conceptual model shown in Exhibit C-1 illustrates the structure of the BGOs used during the planning process. This conceptual model articulates how Plan-wide BGOs and other information (e.g., stressors) contribute to the development of Conservation and Management Actions (CMAs) associated with Covered Activities, which are monitored for effectiveness and adapted as necessary to meet the DRECP Step-Down Biological Objectives. Terms used in Exhibit C-1 are defined in Section C.1.1. Exhibit C-1 Conceptual Model for BGOs Development Appendix C C-1 August 2014 Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX C. BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The BGOs follow the three-tiered approach based on the concepts of scale: landscape, natural community, and species. The following broad biological goals established in the DRECP Planning Agreement guided the development of the BGOs: Provide for the long-term conservation and management of Covered Species within the Plan Area. Preserve, restore, and enhance natural communities and ecosystems that support Covered Species within the Plan Area. The following provides the approach to developing the BGOs. Section C.2 provides the landscape, natural community, and Covered Species BGOs. Specific mapping information used to develop the BGOs is provided in Section C.3.
  • Diverse Sources of Aeolian Sediment Revealed in an Arid Landscape in Southeastern Iran Using a Modified Bayesian Un-Mixing Model

    Diverse Sources of Aeolian Sediment Revealed in an Arid Landscape in Southeastern Iran Using a Modified Bayesian Un-Mixing Model

    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences 2019-12 Diverse sources of aeolian sediment revealed in an arid landscape in southeastern Iran using a modified Bayesian un-mixing model Gholami, H http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15152 10.1016/j.aeolia.2019.100547 Aeolian Research Elsevier All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. 1 Diverse sources of aeolian sediment revealed in an arid landscape in 2 southeastern Iran using a Bayesian un-mixing model 3 Abstract 4 Identifying and quantifying source contributions of aeolian sediment is critical to mitigate 5 local and regional effects of wind erosion in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Sediment 6 fingerprinting techniques have great potential in quantifying the source contribution of sediments. 7 The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of fingerprinting methods in 8 determining the sources of the aeolian sands of a small erg with varied and complex potential 9 sources upwind. A two-stage statistical processes including a Kruskal-Wallis H-test and a stepwise 10 discriminant function analysis (DFA) were applied to select optimum composite fingerprints to 11 discriminate the potential sources of the aeolian sands from the Jazmurian plain located in Kerman 12 Province, southeastern Iran.
  • Hydrologic and Geologic Reconnaissance of Pinto Basin Joshuatree National Monument Riverside County, California

    Hydrologic and Geologic Reconnaissance of Pinto Basin Joshuatree National Monument Riverside County, California

    Hydrologic and Geologic Reconnaissance of Pinto Basin JoshuaTree National Monument Riverside County, California GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1475-O Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Hydrologic and Geologic Reconnaissance of Pinto Basin Joshua Tree National Monument Riverside County, California By FRED KUNKEL HYDROLOGY OF THE PUBLIC DOMAIN GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1475-O Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service JNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1963 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Pago Abstract_______________________________________.__________ 537 Introduction. _____________________________________________________ 537 Purpose and scope of the investigation_______________________--__ 537 Location of the area___________________________________________ 538 Previous investigations and acknowledgments.-___________________ 538 Physiography and geology__________________________________________ 540 General features_______________________________________________ 540 Geologic units.______________________________________________ 541 Water resources___________________________________________________ 544 Surface water.________________________________________________ 544 Ground water_________________________________________________ 545 Occurrence _-_-__-_-_____________-_________-___-__-_-__-_-
  • Palen Solar Project Water Supply Assessment

    Palen Solar Project Water Supply Assessment

    Palen Solar Project Water Supply Assessment Prepared by Philip Lowe, P.E. February 2018 Palen Solar Project APPENDIX G. WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. Project Location and Description ...................................................................................... 1 3. SB 610 Overview and Applicability .................................................................................... 3 4. Chuckwalla Valley Groundwater Basin .............................................................................. 4 4.1 Basin Overview and Storage ......................................................................................................... 4 Groundwater Management ............................................................................................................ 5 4.2 Climate .......................................................................................................................................... 5 4.3 Groundwater Trends ...................................................................................................................... 5 4.4 Groundwater Recharge .................................................................................................................. 7 Subsurface Inflow ......................................................................................................................... 7 Recharge from Precipitation .........................................................................................................
  • Mccoy Solar Energy Project Plan Amendment Supplement

    Mccoy Solar Energy Project Plan Amendment Supplement

    Director’s Protest Resolution Report McCoy Solar Energy Project Plan Amendment California Desert Conservation Area Supplement May 29, 2013 1 Contents Reason for Supplement ................................................................................................................... 3 Reader’s Guide................................................................................................................................ 4 List of Commonly Used Acronyms ................................................................................................ 5 Protesting Party Index ..................................................................................................................... 6 Issue Topics and Responses ............................................................................................................ 7 California Desert Conservation Area .............................................................................................. 7 Vegetation ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Cultural Resources ........................................................................................................................ 11 Water Resources ........................................................................................................................... 14 Biological Resources .................................................................................................................... 17 Wildlife
  • Concentrating Solar Power and Water Issues in the U.S. Southwest

    Concentrating Solar Power and Water Issues in the U.S. Southwest

    Concentrating Solar Power and Water Issues in the U.S. Southwest Nathan Bracken Western States Water Council Jordan Macknick and Angelica Tovar-Hastings National Renewable Energy Laboratory Paul Komor University of Colorado-Boulder Margot Gerritsen and Shweta Mehta Stanford University The Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis is operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the University of Colorado-Boulder, the Colorado School of Mines, the Colorado State University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Stanford University. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A50-61376 March 2015 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Concentrating Solar Power and Water Issues in the U.S. Southwest Nathan Bracken Western States Water Council Jordan Macknick and Angelica Tovar-Hastings National Renewable Energy Laboratory Paul Komor University of Colorado-Boulder Margot Gerritsen and Shweta Mehta Stanford University Prepared under Task No. 6A50.1010 The Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis is operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the University of Colorado-Boulder, the Colorado School of Mines, the Colorado State University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Stanford University. JISEA® and all JISEA-based marks are trademarks or registered trademarks of the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. The Joint Institute for Technical Report Strategic Energy Analysis NREL/TP-6A50-61376 15013 Denver West Parkway March 2015 Golden, CO 80401 303-275-3000 • www.jisea.org Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government.