DOCSLIB.ORG

Food and Agriculture: the Future of Sustainability

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Division for Sustainable Development Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21) Food and Agriculture: The future of sustainability February 2012 DRAFT Study prepared by Daniele Giovannucci Acknowledgements This study is part of the Sustainable Development in the 21st century (SD21) project. The project is implemented by the Division for Sustainable Development of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Support from the European Commission is gratefully acknowledged. This publication has been produced with the support of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs and the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. The concept for this paper was developed by Daniele Giovannucci of the Committee on Sustainability Development and David Le Blanc of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). Four broad-based groups participated in this high-level effort to solicit views of thought leaders from all facets of agriculture on how the food and agricultural system could become significantly more sustainable while best meeting the need for global food security. Group 1: Policy and Trade Group convened by Charlotte Hebebrand of the International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council (IPC) 1, which promotes the role of trade in creating a more open, equitable, productive and sustainable global food & agricultural system. Contributing IPC members include high-level former government officials, agribusiness executives, farm leaders, academics and civil society leaders. IPC makes pragmatic trade policy recommendations to help solve the major challenges facing the global food & agricultural system in the 21st century—the need to promote global food security, to sustainably increase productivity, and to contribute to economic growth and development. IPC convenes influential policymakers, agribusiness executives, farm and civil society leaders, and academics from around the world in order to clarify complex issues, foster broad stakeholder participation in policy deliberations, and build consensus around pragmatic policy recommendations. Group 2: This Business Specialists Group was convened by The Keystone Center and coordinated by Sarah Stokes Alexander, Julie Shapiro and Keith A. Wheeler.2 The contributors for this paper are primarily, but not exclusively, private sector oriented, representing input companies, traders, and food and retail companies as well as several university perspectives. The Keystone Center seeks to solve our society’s most challenging environmental, energy, and public health problems. As an independent facilitator and mediator, it convenes leaders in the public, private, and civic sectors to solve problems and advance good public policy through productive dialogue. The Keystone Center facilitates Field to Market, an alliance of producers, agribusinesses, food companies, retailers, and conservation organizations that is working to facilitate quantification and identification of key environmental and socioeconomic sustainability outcomes and metrics, foster industry-wide dialogue, and generate processes for continued improvement in sustainable commodity agricultural production Group 3: The Rural Livelihoods and Poverty Expert Group was coordinated by Danielle Nierenberg of Worldwatch Institute’s Nourishing the Planet project 3, an evaluation of agricultural innovations that are working to alleviate hunger and poverty, while also protecting natural resources and promoting environmental sustainability and social justice. The group consisted of a diverse set of contributors ranging from authorities on the role of gender in agriculture and leaders of farmers groups to NGO 1 www.agritrade.org 2 http://www.keystone.org/spp/environment/sustainability/field-to-market 3 www.worldwatch.org/nourishingtheplanet ii activists and academics from major universities. Despite the participants’ different backgrounds and viewpoints, a number of common themes emerged that point toward agro-ecological solutions that can that can address challenges to our food system, including the negative effects of climate change on crop production and a growing population. Group 4: An Agricultural Production and Environmental Sustainability Group was convened by Sara Scherr and Jeffrey Milder of EcoAgriculture Partners 4, which offers an independent platform for cross- sectoral dialogue and action among diverse stakeholders — from farmers and community organizations to international businesses, policy makers, NGOs and donors — striving for a world where agricultural communities manage their landscapes as eco-agriculture to enable them simultaneously to enhance rural livelihoods, conserve biodiversity and ecosystem services, and sustainably produce crops, livestock, fish, and fiber. The Group included researchers and agricultural NGO and farmer leaders from 14 countries who have been developing and promoting innovative agricultural production systems that have ecosystem benefits. Danielle Nierenberg, Karen Hansen-Kuhn, Sophia Murphy and Shiney Varghese all contributed important data and research for the paper. Dozens of experts representing many different countries offered their views for the paper. Of course, the views represented in synthesis do not necessarily reflect the contributors’ specific views or the specific endorsement of the entities they represent. The overall paper is an independent synthesis of many views wherein some consensus points have emerged. Despite the diversity of sectors represented here, we feel that there could be even more producer, consumer, or rural community representatives in the mix. As we look to downscale these conversations in the future from the global scale to the more regional/national/local scale, any conversation on sustainability should directly involve the producers themselves. We would like to acknowledge the more than 60 contributors from 23 countries for the time and thoughtful inputs that have enriched this process. Alphabetically they are: Ricardo Abramovay (Professor of Economics, University of São Paulo, Brazil) Bina Agarwal (Director and Professor of Economics, The Institute of Economic Growth, University of Delhi, India) Juliana Albertengo (Program Manager, Agricultura Certificada, Aapresid, Argentina) Telmo J.C. Amado and colleagues (Professor, Federal University of Santa Maria, Brazil) Markus Arbenz (Executive Director, Int’l Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements, Germany) Allen Blackman (Senior Fellow, Resources for the Future, USA) John Buchanan (Director, Food Security, Conservation International, USA) José Joaquín Campos Arce (Director-General, CATIE, Costa Rica) John Coonrod (Executive Vice President, The Hunger Project, USA) Amanda DeSantis (Leader, Sustainability Initiatives, DuPont USA) Michael Doane with Brian Lowry and Tom Nickson (Sustainable Agriculture Policy, Monsanto Company (USA) Bill Even (Senior Manager, Biotech Affairs and Regulatory, Pioneer Hi-Bred International USA) Emile Frison (Director-General, Bioversity International, Italy) Dennis Garrity (Director-General, World Agroforestry Centre, Kenya) Celia Harvey (Vice-President, Conservation International, USA) Carl Hausmann (Managing Director, Global Government and Corporate Affairs , Bunge Limited, US) Charlotte Hebebrand (Chief Executive,, International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council USA) 4 http://www.ecoagriculture.org iii Hans Herren (President, Millennium Institute, USA) Jikun Huang (Director, Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy - Chinese Academy of Sciences China) Wes Jackson (The Land Institute, USA) Robbin Johnson (President, Cargill Foundation and Senior Advisor, Global Policy Studies, University of Minnesota, USA) Nancy Karanja (Professor, University of Nairobi, Urban Harvest, Kenya) Melinda Kimble (Sr. Vice President for Programs, United Nations Foundation US) Claire Kremen (Professor, University of California-Berkeley, USA) Robert Lawrence (Professor of Environmental Health Sciences, The Center for a Livable Future, the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA) Ted Lefroy (Professor, University of Tasmania, Australia) Helio Mattar (President, Akatu Institute for Conscious Consumption, Brazil) Peter May (President, International Society for Ecological Economics and Professor Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) Monique Mikhail (Sustainable Agriculture Policy Adviser, Oxfam GB, United Kingdom) David Molden (Director General, ICIMOD, Nepal) Luis Genaro Muñoz (General Manager, National Federation of Coffee Growers, Colombia) Mark Murphy (AVP Corporate Affairs, Cargill, USA) Amon Murwira (Professor, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe) Keith Newhouse (Director of Business Development, Winfield Solutions, Land O’Lakes USA) Jan Nijhoff (Senior Agricultural Economist, World Bank, Ghana) Mary Njenga (PhD research candidate, Department of Land Resource Management and Agricultural Technology, University of Nairobi and Urban Harvest, Kenya) Ruben Nunes (Professor, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil) Herbert Oberhaensli (Vice President, Economics and International Relations, Nestle S.A. Switzerland) Ruth K. Oniang’o (Founder, Rural Outreach Program, Editor-in-Chief, African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND) (Kenya), Adjunct Professor of Nutrition, Tufts University USA) Rob Paarlberg (B.F. Johnson Professor of Political
Recommended publications
  • Delve Deeper Into Food, Inc a Film by Robert Kenner

    Delve Deeper Into Food, Inc a Film by Robert Kenner

    Delve Deeper into Food, Inc A film by Robert Kenner This multi-media resource list, Public Affairs, 2009. Expanding Second Nature: A Gardener's compiled by Susan Conlon and on the film’s themes, the book Education (1991). Martha Perry of the Princeton Food, Inc. will answer those Public Library, includes books, questions through a series of Richardson, Jill. Recipe for films and other materials challenging essays by leading America: Why Our Food System related to the issues presented experts and thinkers. This book will is Broken and What We Can Do in the film Food, Inc. encourage those inspired by the to Fix It. Ig Publishing, 2009. film to learn more about the issues, Food activist Jill Richardson shows In Food, Inc., filmmaker Robert and act to change the world. how sustainable agriculture—where Kenner lifts the veil on our nation's local farms raise food that is food industry, exposing the highly Hamilton, Lisa M. Deeply healthy for consumers and animals mechanized underbelly that's been Rooted: Unconventional and does not damage the hidden from the American consumer Farmers in the Age of environment—offers the only with the consent of our Agribusiness. Counterpoint, solution to America’s food crisis. In government's regulatory agencies, 2009. Journalist and photographer addition to highlighting the harmful USDA and FDA. Our nation's food Hamilton presents a multicultural conditions at factory farms, this supply is now controlled by a snapshot of the American timely and necessary book details handful of corporations that often sustainable agriculture movement, the rising grassroots food put profit ahead of consumer profiling a Texas dairyman, a New movement, which is creating an health, the livelihood of the Mexican rancher and a North agricultural system that allows American farmer, the safety of Dakotan farmer, all who have people to eat sustainably, locally, workers and our own environment.
  • Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture: Good Practice Examples

    Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture: Good Practice Examples

    SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Reza Ardakanian, Editors SAFE USE OF WASTEWATER IN AGRICULTURE: GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES Hiroshan Hettiarachchi Reza Ardakanian, Editors PREFACE Population growth, rapid urbanisation, more water intense consumption patterns and climate change are intensifying the pressure on freshwater resources. The increasing scarcity of water, combined with other factors such as energy and fertilizers, is driving millions of farmers and other entrepreneurs to make use of wastewater. Wastewater reuse is an excellent example that naturally explains the importance of integrated management of water, soil and waste, which we define as the Nexus While the information in this book are generally believed to be true and accurate at the approach. The process begins in the waste sector, but the selection of date of publication, the editors and the publisher cannot accept any legal responsibility for the correct management model can make it relevant and important to any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, expressed or the water and soil as well. Over 20 million hectares of land are currently implied, with respect to the material contained herein. known to be irrigated with wastewater. This is interesting, but the The opinions expressed in this book are those of the Case Authors. Their inclusion in this alarming fact is that a greater percentage of this practice is not based book does not imply endorsement by the United Nations University. on any scientific criterion that ensures the “safe use” of wastewater. In order to address the technical, institutional, and policy challenges of safe water reuse, developing countries and countries in transition need clear institutional arrangements and more skilled human resources, United Nations University Institute for Integrated with a sound understanding of the opportunities and potential risks of Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources wastewater use.
  • Combatting Monsanto

    Combatting Monsanto

    Picture: Grassroots International Combatting Monsanto Grassroots resistance to the corporate power of agribusiness in the era of the ‘green economy’ and a changing climate La Via Campesina, Friends of the Earth International, Combat Monsanto Technical data name: “Combatting Monsanto Grassroots resistance to the corporate power of agribusiness in the era of the ‘green economy’ and a changing climate” author: Joseph Zacune ([email protected]) with contributions from activists around the world editing: Ronnie Hall ([email protected]) design and layout: Nicolás Medina – REDES-FoE Uruguay March 2012 Combatting Monsanto Grassroots resistance to the corporate power of agribusiness in the era of the ‘green economy’ and a changing climate INDEX Executive summary / 2 Company profile - Monsanto / 3 Opposition to Monsanto in Europe / 5 A decade of French resistance to GMOs / 6 Spanish movements against GM crops / 9 German farmers’ movement for GM-free regions / 10 Organising a movement for food sovereignty in Europe / 10 Monsanto, Quit India! / 11 Bt brinjal and biopiracy / 11 Bt cotton dominates cotton sector / 12 Spiralling debt still triggering suicides / 12 Stopping Monsanto’s new public-private partnerships / 13 Resistance to Monsanto in Latin America / 14 Brazilian peasant farmers’ movement against agribusiness / 14 Ten-year moratorium on GM in Peru / 15 Landmark ruling on toxic soy in Argentina / 15 Haitians oppose seed aid / 16 Guatemalan networks warn of new biosafety proposals / 17 Battle-lines drawn in the United States / 17 Stopping the
  • Integrated Farming Systems and Sustainable Agriculture in France P

    Integrated Farming Systems and Sustainable Agriculture in France P

    Integrated Farming Systems and Sustainable Agriculture in France P. Viaux Technical Institute of Cereals and Forages (ITCF), Boigneville, France Abstract The concept of sustainable agriculture includes important components of economic, environmental, agricultural and social sustainability. To obtain a better under-standing of the concept and interactions of these components, trials were implemented in 1990 in different agroecological regions by ITCF and ACTA to compare the performance of conventional farming systems (CFS) with integrated farming systems (IFS). CFS is a cropping system that is commonly employed by many farmers and requires substantial off-farm inputs such as chemical fertilizers and pesticides. IFS is a low input system which attempts to minimize environmental impacts. Trials were established on farms of 15 to 75 hectares using large plots of 1 to 5 hectares to better evaluate the system’s feasibility, and its economic and environmental parameters. After four years, results for the IFS have shown that a significant reduction in production inputs and costs (25 to 37%) are possible, especially for agrichemicals. Compared with CFS, IFS strategies may lead to lower crop yields (up to 30%) although the economic net return is often higher because of lower production costs. However, studies will continue because there are many aspects of IFS that need to be improved to enhance the system’s economic viability, including intercropping, reduced tillage, and non-chemical weed and pest control. Introduction Agricultural productivity in France has made tremendous progress in the last 30 years, during which time crop yields have more than doubled. Nevertheless, these technological advances have not been achieved without great cost to the environment and to society.
  • Wilson County, NC Agricultural Development Plan

    Wilson County, NC Agricultural Development Plan

    Wilson County Agricultural Development Plan Sandy Maddox, Ed. D. December 2017 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 6 A Need for Action .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Overview of Wilson County ........................................................................................................................ 12 Wilson County Demographics ................................................................................................................. 13 Economy.................................................................................................................................................. 15 Cost of Services ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Infrastructure .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Education ................................................................................................................................................ 19 Natural Attributes ..................................................................................................................................
  • PHOTOSYNTHESIS • Life on Earth Ultimately Depends on Energy Derived from the Sun

    PHOTOSYNTHESIS • Life on Earth Ultimately Depends on Energy Derived from the Sun

    Garden of Earthly Delights or Paradise Lost? [email protected] Old Byzantine Proverb: ‘He who has bread may have troubles He who lacks it has only one’ Peter Bruegel the Elder: The Harvest (1565) (Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York. USA) PHOTOSYNTHESIS • Life on earth ultimately depends on energy derived from the sun. • Photosynthesis by green plants is the only process of Sucrose biological importance that can capture this energy. Starch Proteins • It provides energy, organic matter and Oils oxygen, and is the only sustainble energy source on our planet. WE DEPEND TOTALLY ON PLANTS TO SUSTAIN ALL OTHER LIFE FORMS 1 Agriculture the most important event in human history Agriculture critical to the future of our planet and humanity Agriculture is part of the knowledge based bio-economy of the 21st century Each Year the World’s Population will Grow by about ca. 75 Million People. The world population has doubled in the last 50 years 2008 Developing countries 1960 10% of the Population Lives 1927 on 0.5% of the World’s Income Developed countries 2 Four innovations brought about change in agriculture in the twentieth century.What are the innovations which will change agriculture in this century? Mechanisation: Tractors freed up perhaps 25 % of extra land to grow human food instead of fodder for draught horses and oxen; • Fertilisers: Fritz Haber’s 1913 invention of a method of synthesising ammonia transformed agricultural productivity, so that today nearly half the nitrogen atoms in your body were ‘fixed’ from the air in an ammonia factory, not in a soil bacterium; • Pesticides: Chemicals derived from hydrocarbons enabled farmers to grow high-density crops year after year without severe loss to pests and weeds; • Genetics: In the 1950s Norman Borlaug crossed a variety of dwarf wheat, originally from Japan, with a different Mexican strain to make dwarf wheats that responded to heavy fertilisation by producing more seeds, not longer stalks.
  • Increase Food Production Without Expanding Agricultural Land

    Increase Food Production Without Expanding Agricultural Land

    COURSE 2 Increase Food Production without Expanding Agricultural Land In addition to the demand-reduction measures addressed in Course 1, the world must boost the output of food on existing agricultural land. To approach the goal of net-zero expansion of agricultural land, improvements in crop and livestock productivity must exceed historical rates of yield gains. Chapter 10 assesses the land-use challenge, based on recent trend lines. Chapters 11–16 discuss possible ways to increase food production per hectare while adapting to climate change. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 10. Assessing the Challenge of Limiting Agricultural Land Expansion .............................147 Chapter 11. Menu Item: Increase Livestock and Pasture Productivity ........................................167 Chapter 12. Menu Item: Improve Crop Breeding to Boost Yields ..............................................179 Chapter 13. Menu Item: Improve Soil and Water Management ...............................................195 Chapter 14. Menu Item: Plant Existing Cropland More Frequently ........................................... 205 Chapter 15. Adapt to Climate Change ........................................................................... 209 Chapter 16. How Much Could Boosting Crop and Livestock Productivity Contribute to Closing the Land and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Gaps? .....................................................221 Creating a Sustainable Food Future 145 146 WRI.org CHAPTER 10 ASSESSING THE CHALLENGE OF LIMITING AGRICULTURAL LAND EXPANSION How hard will it be to stop net expansion of agricultural land? This chapter evaluates projections by other researchers of changes in land use and explains why we consider the most optimistic projections to be too optimistic. We discuss estimates of “yield gaps,” which attempt to measure the potential of farmers to increase yields given current crop varieties. Finally, we examine conflicting data about recent land-cover change and agricultural expansion to determine what they imply for the future.
  • The Causes and Consequences of Agricultural Expansion in Matopiba

    The Causes and Consequences of Agricultural Expansion in Matopiba

    WORKING PAPER THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF AGRICULTURAL EXPANSION IN MATOPIBA ARTHUR BRAGANÇA JULY 2016 THEME AGRICULTURE KEYWORDS AGRICULTURE, DEVELOPMENT, AGRICULTURAL FRONTIER The Land Use Initiative (INPUT – Iniciativa para o Uso da Terra) is a dedicated team of specialists who work at the forefront of how to increase environmental protection and food production. INPUT engages stakeholders in Brazil’s public and private sec¬tors and maps the challenges for a better management of its natural resources. Research conducted under INPUT is generously sup¬ported by the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF) through a grant to the Climate Policy Initiative. www.inputbrasil.org 3 The Causes and Consequences of Agricultural Expansion in Matopiba∗ Arthur Bragançay CPI July 2016 Abstract This paper examines the causes and consequences of the agricultural expansion in Matopiba (Brazil) over the past two decades. It documents that agricultural expansion in this region is concentrated in municipalities in the Cerrado biome. The estimates indicate that since the late 1990s agricultural output is increasing faster in municipal- ities in this biome when compared to municipalities outside the biome. Agricultural expansion led to increases in GDP per capita. The increase in GDP per capita is a re- sult of direct effects on the agricultural sector as well as indirect effects on services sector. The estimates also suggest that municipalities in the biome experienced larger gains in the access to durable consumer goods such as TV and refrigerator and in ba- sic infrastructure such as access to electric power. However, the results do not indicate differential changes in migration and human capital investments between Cerrado and non-Cerrado municipalities.
  • Towards Climate Smart Farming—A Reference Architecture for Integrated Farming Systems

    Towards Climate Smart Farming—A Reference Architecture for Integrated Farming Systems

    Article Towards Climate Smart Farming—A Reference Architecture for Integrated Farming Systems Georgios Kakamoukas 1 , Panagiotis Sarigiannidis 1,* , Andreas Maropoulos 1, Thomas Lagkas 2 , Konstantinos Zaralis 3 and Chrysoula Karaiskou 1 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece; [email protected] (G.K.); [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (C.K.) 2 Department of Computer Science, Kavala Campus, International Hellenic University, 65404 Thessaloniki, Greece; [email protected] 3 Department of Agriculture, School of Agricultural Sciences, University of Western Macedonia, 50100 Kozani, Greece; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Climate change is emerging as a major threat to farming, food security and the livelihoods of millions of people across the world. Agriculture is strongly affected by climate change due to increasing temperatures, water shortage, heavy rainfall and variations in the frequency and intensity of excessive climatic events such as floods and droughts. Farmers need to adapt to climate change by developing advanced and sophisticated farming systems instead of simply farming at lower intensity and occupying more land. Integrated agricultural systems constitute a promising solution, as they can lower reliance on external inputs, enhance nutrient cycling and increase natural resource use efficiency. In this context, the concept of Climate-Smart Agriculture (CSA) emerged as a promising solution to secure the resources for the growing world population under climate change conditions. This work proposes a CSA architecture for fostering and supporting integrated agricultural systems, such as Mixed Farming Systems (MFS), by facilitating the design, the deployment and the management of Citation: Kakamoukas, G.; crop–livestock-=forestry combinations towards sustainable, efficient and climate resilient agricultural Sarigiannidis, P.; Maropoulos, A.; systems.
  • Interaction Between Cultivation and Livestock Production in Semi-Arid

    Interaction Between Cultivation and Livestock Production in Semi-Arid

    13 The Interaction Between Cultivation and Livestock Production in Senmi-Arid Africa R.L. McCowN, G. HAVAAND, and C. DE HAAN 13.1 Introduction Although the majority of people in semi-arid Africa sustain themselves primarily by growing crops, this means of production is not pri:uticed by all, nor is it the sole means practiced by the majority. Because of inadequate rainfall and high evaporation rates, average crop yields are low, and the risk of crop failure Traditionally the inhabitants of is high. these regions have relied on domestic grazing animals to supplemenr their food supply. The ultimate degree of this embodied in pure pastoralism: dependence is however, semi-arid Afica has a wide variation, both in the nature and range of the degree of economic dependency on livestock. From the title of this chapter, the reader might reasonably expect a survey of current importance of livestock the in the agricut,iral regions of semi-arid Africa. even if we had the African experience But and relevant literatuie at our command attempt such a survey, it is to unlikely that this would be the most useful contribution. Instead, an attempt sort of is made to isolate the different types relationship or linkage that of characterize the interaction between cultivation livestock production and to consider and the conditions under which each linkage be expected to occur. Eight can cases from summer rainfall, semi-arid zones (Fig. 13.1) are described which of Africa demonstrate various configurations of existing production systems, linkages in together with the conditions under which developed. Finally, the trends they have in the forms of linkages from an evolutionary standpoint are considered.
  • Research and Education for the Development of Integrated Crop-Livestock-Fishfarming Systems in the Tropics DEC 2 1

    Research and Education for the Development of Integrated Crop-Livestock-Fishfarming Systems in the Tropics DEC 2 1

    S'H ICLARM STUDIESAND REVIEWS16 I. 207 I SR76 #.16 C.t 1 Research and Education for the Development of , r Integrated Crop-livestock-Fish Farming t \ Systems in the Tropics P. Edwards R.S.V. Pullin J.A. Gartner I If - I:' '!Io, .. .... \D ',- .'. , r . ~ _frl~TERNATIONAL C~NTER FOR LIVING AQUATIC RESOURCES MANAG.EMENT , " i ' :1 i I .I earch and Education for the Development of Integrated Crop-Livestock-Fish Farming Systems in the Tropics J.A. Gartner INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LIVING AQUATIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT MANILA, PHILIPPINES Research and education for the development of integrated crop-livestock-fishfarming systems in the tropics DEC 2 1 P. EDWARDS R.S.V. hum J. A. GARTNER Published by the International Center for Living Aauatic Reswrces Mana~ement.MC P.O. Box 1501. ~hcati,Metm Manila, Pklippiis with fmancid assistance from the United Nations Development Programme New York. USA Printed in Manila. Philippines Edwards. P.. R.S.V. Pullin and J.A. Gamer. 1988. Research and education for the development of integrated cmp-livestock-fish farming systems in the tropics. ICLARM Studies and Reviews 16.53 p. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, Philippines. ISSN 01 15-4389 ISBN 97 1-1022-46-X Cover: Small-scale integrated crop-livestock-fish farming in a rainfed area of Northeast ?hailand. ?his ria farm has a small fishpond that provides fish. pennits dry season cultivation of vegetables on rhe dikes and suppliis drinking water for livestock. ICLARM Contribution No. 470 Contents Preface ................................................. Introduction .............................................. The Concept of Integrated Farming Systems A Definition of Integrated Farming ...........................
  • Dakota Olson Hometown

    Dakota Olson Hometown

    Evaluating the Effect of Management Practices on Soil Moisture, Aggregation and Crop Development By: Dakota Olson Hometown: Keswick, IA The World Food Prize Foundation 2014 Borlaug-Ruan International Internship Research Center: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) Location: El Batan, Mexico P a g e | 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements……………………………………………………………………………..3 Background Information………………………………………………………………………..4 CIMMYT Research Institute The Dr. Borlaug Legacy (in relation to CIMMYT) Discuss the long-term project of CIMMYT (1999-2014) Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………5 Introduction to Field Management Practices Objectives Conservation Agriculture Program Procedures and Methodology………………………………………………………………….6 The Field Plot Technical Skills o Yield Calculations o Time to Pond Measurements o Calculating Volumetric Water Content Results……………………………………………………………………………………………8 Objective 1: Effect of Tillage Method and Crop Residue on Soil Moisture Objective 2: Effect of Tillage Method and Crop Residue on Crop Yield Objective 3: Relationship between Time to Pond and Crop Yield Analysis of Results…………………………………………………………………………….11 Discussion, Conclusion, and Recommendations…………………………………………..15 Personal Experiences…………………………………………………………………………17 Pictures…………………………………………………………………………………………20 References and Citations…………………………………………………………………….21 P a g e | 3 Preface and Acknowledgements My success at the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) would not be possible without the multitude of supporters that allowed me to pursue this incredible opportunity. A massive thank-you to the World Food Prize Organization and the staff and supporters that supply hundreds of youth and adults across the world with empowerment and opportunities to play as a stake-holder in international development issues. A big thank- you to Lisa Fleming of the World Food Prize Foundation for playing an integral role in the success of my international internship while in Mexico.