DOCSLIB.ORG

Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details RETURN MIGRATION TO THE CAUCASUS: THE ADYGE -ABKHAZ DIASPORA(S), TRANSNATIONALISM AND LIFE AFTER RETURN Jade Cemre Erciyes A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Sussex for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in MIGRATION STUDIES SCHOOL OF GLOBAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX Brighton, UK , January 2014 DECLARATION I HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS THESIS HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED, EITHER IN THE SAME OR DIFFERENT FORM, TO THIS OR ANY OTHER UNIVERSITY FOR A DEGREE. SIGNATURE: JADE CEMRE ERCIYES For all those who are searching for their belonging in the Caucasian mountains… and in memory of the one s who found it there... DEGUF SABAHAT BAYBAS LUGON 8 April 1934 – 27 January 2012 2 October 2011, on our way from Abkhazia to Adygeya , Deguf Sabahat is telling about what she learned as a child – the three things that makes a person Adyge: Kheku (the homeland), Khabze (the etiquette) and the Bze (language). Sabahat was not only an Adyge by her deep connection to her ancestral homeland, etiquette and language, but she was also the symbol of a transnational life that awaits a whole new generation of Adyge -Abkhaz people, living between her homes in Turkey, Swit zerland , Adygeya and Abkhazia, in between modernity and traditions, in complete freedom of soul and body, travelling far and beyond but always finding parts of herself in the Caucasian mountains. RETURN MIGRATION TO THE CAU CASUS: THE ADYGE -ABKHAZ DIASPORA(S), TRANSNATIONALISM AND LIFE AFTER RETURN Jade Cemre Erciyes University o f Sussex PhD Migration Studies Abstract This thesis investigate s the dual transnationalism of ancestral return migrants, that is to say people “returning” to the territory where their ancestors had once migrated from. Dispersed from their homeland in the second half of the 19th century, the Adyge -Abkhaz diaspora has been involved in a variety of transnation al practices in relation to their homeland in the Caucasus ; and some , with considerable effort , have been settling there especially in the last two decades. The tran snational involvement of this diaspora , most of whom live today in Turkey , is motivated by their search for belonging. Many who go back and forth between Turkey and the Caucasus are involved in transnational diaspora associations and take an active role in the formation of a transnational ethno -political -cultural environment for new generatio ns growing up in the diaspora. The m ajority of those who have “return migrated” to their homeland in the Caucasus, in this study to two republics , Adygeya (an autonomous republic under the Russian Federation) and Abkhazia (a republic with contested independence) , develop new transnational links to their diaspora communities in Turkey . This thes is is the product of a multi -sited, mu lti -method research project that combines theories related to transnationalism, diaspora and return, as well as migrant adaptation. Using life -history interviews, semi -structured interviews and participant observation, fieldwork for the research took place in rural diaspora settlements and urban diaspora organisations in Turkey as we ll as in the Caucasus , thereby enabling the researcher to study both ends of the migration route. Existing studies on ancestral return migration focus on pull and push factors, which hitherto have focused on sending and receiving countries separately. This thesis ar gues that their dual transnatio nalism, both in the diaspora (in Turkey) looking back towards the diasporic homeland, and after return looking back towards the diaspora, turn s the m into the “diaspora of their diaspora ”. Table of Contents DECLARATION ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... i Dedication ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ... ii Abstract ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... iii Table of Contents ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... iv List of figures ................................ ................................ ................................ ............................ vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................ ................................ ................................ ...... vi ii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ............................... 1 1.1 Research Questions ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 3 1.2 The Framework: Dual Transnationalism ................................ ................................ ..... 4 1.2.1 Transnationalism ................................ ................................ ................................ .6 1.2.2 Diaspora ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 7 1.2.2.1 Class ical Definitions and Critiques ................................ ................................ 8 1.2.2.2 Tr ansnationalism of the Diaspora ................................ ................................ ... 9 1.2.3 Return ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 11 1.2.3. 1 Transnationalism and Return ................................ ................................ .......... 13 1.2.4 Post -Return Processes ................................ ................................ ....................... 13 1.2.5 Dual Transnation alism ................................ ................................ ....................... 15 1.3 Overview of the Thesis ................................ ................................ ............................. 17 CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND ................................ ................................ ............................... 20 2.1 Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 20 2.2 Caucasian History ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... 21 2.2.1 Abkhaz Kingdom ................................ ................................ ............................... 22 2.2.2 Circassia/Cherkessia ................................ ................................ .......................... 22 2.2.3 Hundred Year Wars ................................ ................................ ........................... 23 2.2.4 Exile ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 25 2.3 Diaspora ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 27 2.3.1 Life in the Ottoman Empire and the Young Republic o f Turkey ...................... 28 2.3.2 First and Second -Generation Attempts to Return ................................ ............. 29 2.3.3 Diasporisation: Urbanisation and the “Dernek” ................................ ................ 30 2.3.4 Third and Fourth -Gen erations “Returnist” Movement ................................ ...... 33 2.3.5 First V isits to the Homeland (1970s) ................................ ................................ .34 2.4 Ad ygeya ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 35 iv 2.4.1 Borders and People ................................ ................................ ............................ 36 2.4.2 L aws and Regulations on Return ................................ ................................ ....... 36 2.5 Abkhazia ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 37 2.5.1 Borders and People ................................ ................................ ............................ 37 2.5.2 L aws and Regulations on Return ................................ ................................ ....... 38 2.6 Conclusion ................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 40 CHAPTER 3: METH ODOLOGY AND FIELDWORK CONTEXT ................................ ...... 42 3.1 Introduction ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 42 3.2 Choic e of Field Sites ................................ ................................ ................................ .45 3.2.1 Choice of Field Site s in the Caucasian “Homeland” ................................ ......... 45 3.2.2 Choice of Field Sites in Turkey ................................ ...............................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Language Situation Among the Circassians of Jordan
    Educational Research (ISSN: 2141-5161) Vol. 4(8) pp. 612-617, August, 2013 DOI: http:/dx.doi.org/10.14303/er.2013.113 Available online@ http://www.interesjournals.org/ER Copyright © 2013 International Research Journals Full Length Research Paper The Language situation among the Circassians of Jordan Doa ʾa F. Al-Momani*1 and Siham M. Al-Momani *1Al Balqa' Applied University (Jordan) 2Department of Allied Medical Sciences, Al Balqa' Applied University (Jordan) *Corresponding Author`s E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In this paper, we examine the language situation among the Circassians of Jordan within the framework of previous theories on language maintenance and shift as proposed by Fishman. The study investigates factors influencing the sample responses toward importance and usefulness of the Arabic and Circassian languages. Convenience sample include 100 subject selected by five in group persons. Data collected by means of a questionnaire developed and used by previous investigators. Results indicate that Arabic is used by the respondents for various functions and Circasssian is used in very restricted social domains. Evidence is represented that the overwhelming majority of the Circassians agree that it is important for them to speak in both Arabic as a means of communication, and Circassian as an important symbol of their identity. These results indicate that the Circassians of Jordan are experiencing a process of language shift which appears to be in its initial position, as most of them appear to be less proficient in their language. They also indicate that the younger generation (forty years or below) of Circassians show a stronger tendency toward shifting their speech than the older generation (forty years or above).
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICS 315 Nationalism and Identity
    POLITICS 315 Nationalism and Identity Course syllabus Course coordinator: Dr James Headley Semester 2 2014 Course description This course explores the major debates and themes in the study of nations and nationalism. The first half of the course examines the notion of identity, the concepts of nation and ethnicity, the origins of nations and nationalism, and the historical development of nationalism from the nineteenth century to the post-Cold War period. The second half of the course examines contemporary debates about nationalism, including the basis of national identity, national identity in an international context, poly-ethnic and multinational states, and self-determination and secession. A variety of examples from around the world are used to illustrate. Course details Lecturer: Dr James Headley Office Hours: Mon 2-3, Thurs 1-2 (or by appointment) Room 4S1, 4th Floor, Arts Building Tel: 479 8616 Email: [email protected] Lectures and tutorials: There are two lectures per week, on Tuesdays and Thursdays, 10:00-10:50am. The lectures are designed to give an introduction to the main themes and issues of the course. They combine theoretical and empirical analysis of nationalism and associated issues, using a range of examples. I will give a skeletal handout for each lecture, but it is up to you to take relevant notes. Sometimes it may be necessary to complete the topic of a lecture in the following lecture as they do not always fit conveniently into 50-minute time slots. There will also be one tutorial per week (times/groups to be arranged), starting week two, for student-centred discussion and debate of readings relating to topics covered in the lectures.
    [Show full text]
  • BLACK SEA SUBMARINE VALLEYS – PATTERNS, SYSTEMS, NETWORKS Dan C
    BLACK SEA SUBMARINE VALLEYS – PATTERNS, SYSTEMS, NETWORKS DAN C. JIPA1, NICOLAE PANIN1, CORNEL OLARIU2, CORNEL POP1 1National Institute of Marine Geology and Geo-Ecology (GeoEcoMar), 23-25 Dimitrie Onciul St., 024053 Bucharest, Romania 2Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, 2305 Speedway Stop, C1160, Austin, TX 78712-1692 Abstract. The article presents a detailed analysis of the underwater morphology of the entire Black Sea basin beyond the shelf break. The focus is on submarine valley systems on continental slope and rise zones, and partially in the abyssal plain area. The present research is among the very few studies that have undertaken a morphological analysis on a regional scale, for an entire marine basin. This achievement was possible by using the publicly available EMODnet bathymetric map of the Black Sea. The Black Sea submarine valleys networks are presented in a map-sketch. It includes 25 valley systems, 5 groups of simple first order channels, and other number of simple, not associated channels. The 25 valley systems are adding up more than 110 main channels and tributaries. Morphological description and analysis of each of the mapped systems is given – shape and plan view morphology, dimensions (length and surface) and slope gradient. Some considerations about the amount of sediments supplied by the valleys from the shelf to the basin floor, forming the deep-sea fans, are presented. For a more detailed and precise image of the Black Sea network of submarine valleys additional work would be necessary to cover the entire basin with a minimum standard network of modern bathymetric mapping and of high resolution seismic survey lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Violation of Children's Rights in Gali District
    No Future Violation of Children’s Rights Land in Gali District Contacts E [email protected] W http://truth-hounds.org/en/ https://www.facebook.com/truthhounds E [email protected] W https://www.nofutureland.org/ https://www.facebook.com/Nofutureland/ Contents Executive Summary 4 Introduction 5 Sources of Information and Methodology of Documentation 7 The Rights of Children to Life and Health 8 Right to Education 12 Freedom of Movement 18 Legal Qualifications 23 The Right to Education 24 Freedom of Movement 25 The Right of Children to Life and Health 26 Conclusion and Recommendations 28 Authors of the Report 29 4 Executive Summary This report presents compelling evidence of human rights violations in occupied Abkhazian territories, specifically in Gali district, a predominantly Georgian part close to the boundary line. As for the time of the publication of this report, the people living in Gali are lacking the opportunity to cross the demarcation line without restrictions, they become victims of arbitrary detentions and illegal imprisonment, have limited accessibility to health services and are forced to apply for an “Abkhazian Passports” to get to work, to travel within and out of the region, etc. The right to education of children living in Gali is also violated. Their right and opportunity to education in their native Georgian language are deprived because Georgian was replaced with Russian at all schools of lower and upper zones of Gali in 2015. Children are the victims of “Russification”, ethnic discrimination and suppression of their Georgian identity. The amount of children crossing the boundary line on a daily basis, to study at schools on Tbilisi-controlled territory, is decreasing with every year.
    [Show full text]
  • Dancing the Nation in the North Caucasus
    _______________________________________________________________________ ARTICLES Dancing the Nation in the North Caucasus Sufi an Zhemukhov and Charles King In the realm of nations and nationalism, what are the limits of invention? With the upsurge in writing on Eurasian and east European nation building, we now know a great deal about the formulation and remaking of national categories, from the work of state-sponsored ethnographers to the struggle be- tween incumbent and oppositional politicians.1 Yet the persistent challenge, to paraphrase Karl Marx, is to understand exactly how and why people are unable to make their histories just as they please. Even though traditions may be invented and communities imagined, it is no simple task to identify the specifi c moments when these phenomena actually occur, especially when the inventing and imagining are not the mere result of government fi at or ethno- graphic creativity. Moreover, in our enthusiasm for deconstructing national belonging, it is easy to lose sight of the ways in which large numbers of people perform the ethnonational categories that scholars now assiduously unbuild. How might we map those precise points in time when decisions about national forms get negotiated by actors with little to gain from the process—apart from, so far as we can tell, a sincere wish to be somehow true to a collectively imag- ined past? What is at stake—culturally, historically, and even politically— when people decide to “do being ethnic” in one way and not another, and all within the context of a globalized, post-Soviet world? 2 There is no clearer illustration of these phenomena than what might be called ethnokinetics, that is, forms of human motion that are locally catego- rized as essential to collective belonging—from “ethnic dance,” to the forms of posture thought to be exemplary of a particular ethnonational category, to virtually any collective performance that valorizes bodies in motion.
    [Show full text]
  • RETURN of the CIRCASSIAN WORLD: MAY the FORCE BE with YOU Written for the Return of the Circassian World Website on January 2018 by Jade Cemre Erciyes
    RETURN OF THE CIRCASSIAN WORLD: MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU written for the return of the Circassian World Website on January 2018 by Jade Cemre Erciyes When Metin Sönmez, the renowned creator of the CircassianWorld and AbkhazWorld Websites, besides many others, asked me to write an article for the return of the CircassianWorld by the beginning of 2018, after a break of more than 4, I got very excited. There were so many things to tell about what it meant for me in the past, what it means for me today, and what it will mean for academics, researchers or journalists working on the Circassian people the moment it becomes online. It is not that easy to start writing this article from its main topic for various reasons. First of all, someone, not much knowledgeable about Circassians may be reading this piece. Besides, I do not want to just narrate a self-reflexive story or a list of key points acknowledging the value of the CircassianWorld. I decided to design this paper as a resource for researchers who may, one day, be interested in the development of the Circassian scholarship. To reflect upon this, it is important for me to start with a short introduction about the earliest works on the Circassian people and the Caucasus1. This is followed by a short review of works focusing on the diasporisation of the Circassians – or in other words, the events of the 19th Century2. This part is a response to a question that I frequently hear in the diaspora which I had been meaning to write for a long time (and I do in my forthcoming book in Turkish).
    [Show full text]
  • Question on the Dominant Religion in Modern Abkhazia
    ISSN 2414-1143 Научный альманах стран Причерноморья. 2016. Том 8. № 4 UDC 101 QUESTION ON THE DOMINANT RELIGION IN MODERN ABKHAZIA O. Zdorovtseva extern student. Institute of philosophy and social-political science Southern federal university. Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation [email protected] This study aims to show that Christianity is neither traditional nor dominant religion of Abkhazia in spite of the current official position of the state power and religious identity of the population in this issue. Objectives: 1) to show on the basis of historical and statistical data that in Abkhazia at the beginning of the twentieth century the Orthodoxy prevailed nominally and not really because of the actual Islamization of the population; 2) to show that modern statistics in relation to Orthodoxy as formal as in the early twentieth cen- tury due to the fact that the Abkhazians follow the Abkhaz traditional religion. According to the Statistical Yearbook of Russia of 1913 the Orthodox Christians in Abkhazia were in the majority – 85,14 %, Muslims – 11,12 %. Archival data only thirty-two years ago suggests the opposite: in Sukhumi, the Bzyb and Anguish administrative districts the proportion of Mohammedans was 85,48% of the entire population, that exceeded the number of Orthodox more than 70%, and in the whole province persons of the Muslim faith were in dominate. The data of the Statistical Yearbook, probably, have been achieved in the short time due to the quantitative extension of the number of formally baptized residents, essentially re- maining “in their opinion” religion. According to the 1897 census the majority of the population in Abkhazia were peasants – 848 per- sons per 1000 (for comparison students consisted of 64,1 people per 1000 people), the clergy – 23 281, 3 people in the whole province (+10 582,41 people engaged in worship and service in the liturgical buildings).
    [Show full text]
  • Renewed Circassian Mobilization in the North Caucasus 20-Years After the Fall of the Soviet Union
    Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe Vol 11, No 2, 2012, 103-135 Copyright © ECMI 21 December 2012 This article is located at: http://www.ecmi.de/publications/detail/issue-22012-vol-11-254/ Renewed Circassian Mobilization in the North Caucasus 20-years after the Fall of the Soviet Union Lars Funch Hansen* University of Copenhagen The renewed ethnic mobilization among Circassians in the North Caucasus region in Russia that has unfolded since the latter half of the 2000s is illustrated by the establishment of new civil society organizations and a substantially increased number of internet-based initiatives. All of this reflects a new and increased form of agency and unity among the Circassians in which youth activism has played key role. It also illustrates how Circassian civil society actors and cyber-activists have not only been able to establish a counter-public sphere or develop a new space for action, but also increasingly have been able to move key issues from Circassian spheres into the wider public sphere of mainstream Russian media and politics. The upcoming 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, in particular, has functioned as a lever in this process, which has also resulted in increasing support among Circassians for calls for recognition of the nineteenth century forced expulsion of the majority of the Circassians from the Caucasus as an act of genocide. In this manner, a mega-event such as the Sochi Olympics has contributed to generating a more radical or politicized understanding or framing of the Caucasian exodus that, since the fall of the Soviet Union, has generally been known as “our national tragedy”.
    [Show full text]
  • Circassians Development in Jordan 1870-2010
    Circassians Language (Adighabza) Development in Jordan 1870-2010 Dr. Moh'd Yacoub Khawaj Jordan Environmental Studies Centre P.O.Box 5689 Amman 11183 Jordan Email: [email protected] Ürdün’de Çerkesçe (Adiğabaza) Gelişimi 1870 – 2010 Yılları Arasında Dr. Moh'd Yacoub Khawaj Jordan Environmental Studies Centre, P.O.Box 5689 Amman 11183 Jordan Email: [email protected] Settling in Jordan: Circassians* arrived to Jordan in the late 1860's coming from there homeland in North Caucasus, after they lost the unbalanced war with the Russians, who intended to occupy the Caucasus for longtime. (The term “Circassian” is a term which I refer to: the people of North Caucasus as known in Turkish, were majority of Circassians out of homeland are; Shapsugh, Abzakh, Kabardians, Bjadugh, Ubykhs, Hatukuay, Adamey, Kemirgoy, Makhosh, Natekuay, Jana, Yegerikuay, Abazin, Abkhaz, Shashan and Daghistans). Ürdündeki ilk Çerkes yerleşimleri Çerkesler**, yıllardır Kafkasya’yı işgal etme niyetinde olan Ruslar’a karşı verdikleri eşitsiz koşullardaki savaşı kaybettikten sonra, anavatanları olan Kuzey Kafkasya’dan göç etmek zorunda kalarak, 1860’ların sonlarında Ürdün’e ulaştılar. ** Burada “Çerkes” kavramını, Türkçe’de kullanıldığı biçimiyle, Kuzey Kafkasya halklarını kapsayacak biçimde kullanıyorum. Anayurt dışındaki Çerkesler’in büyük büyük çoğunluğunu Şapsığlar, Bjeduğlar, Abzehler, Adameyler, Hatkuaylar, Kemirgoylar, Makhoşlar, Nathuaclar, Janeler, Yecerikuaylar, Kabardeyler, Abhazlar, Abazinler, Vubıhlar, Çeçenler, ve Dağıstanlılar oluşturmaktadır. • Settling In Summary: Circassians settled in Jordan, they settled in Amman and Suburbs, within 50 km distance, most of them spoke their native language with different dialects. Kabardian Dialect were dominant in Amman, Jerash, Suweileh and Russeifa. Bjadough Dialect were dominant in Wadi Essir and Naur. Nohchi Dialect were dominant among Shashans Yerleşim Özeti Özet olarak, Çerkesler’in Ürdün’de Amman ve çevresinde, su kaynaklarına 50 kilometre kadar mesafede yerlere yerleştikleri söylenebilir.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily re ect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scienti c institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the rst time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Program Maps 10/31/2008
    USG HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO GEORGIA 40° E 42° E The boundaries and names used on this map 44° E T'bilisi & Affected46° E Areas Majkop do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the U.S. Government. ADRA a SC Ga I GEORGIA CARE a UMCOR a Cherkessk CHF IC UNFAO CaspianA Sea 44° CNFA A UNICEF J N 44° Kuban' Counterpart Int. Ea USAID/Georgia Aa N Karachayevsk RUSSIA FAO A WFP E ABKHAZIA E !0 Psou IOCC a World Vision Da !0 UNFAO A 0 Nal'chik IRC G J Various G a ! Gagra Bzyb' Groznyy RUSSIA 0 Pskhu IRD I Various a ! Nazran "ABKHAZIA" Novvy Afon Pitsunda 0 Omarishara Mercy Corps Ca Various E a ! Lata Sukhumi Mestia Gudauta!0 !0 Kodori Inguri Vladikavkaz Otap !0 Khaishi Kvemo-gulripsh Lentekhi !0 Tkvarcheli Dzhvari RACHA-LECHKHUMI-RACHA-LECHKHUMI- Terek BLACK Ochamchira Gali Tsalenjhikha KVEMOKVEMO SVANETISVANETI RUSSIA Khvanchkara Rioni MTSKHETA-MTSKHETA- Achilo Pichori Zugdidi SAMEGRELO-SAMEGRELO- Kvaisi Mleta SEA ZEMOZEMO Ambrolauri MTIANETIMTIANETI Pasanauri Alazani Khobi Tskhaltubo Tkibuli "SOUTH OSSETIA" Anaklia SVANETISVANETI Aragvi Qvirila SHIDASHIDA KARTLIKARTLI Senaki Kurta Artani Rioni Samtredia Kutaisi Chiatura Tskhinvali Poti IMERETIIMERETI Lanchkhuti Rioni !0 Akhalgori KAKHETIKAKHETI Chokhatauri Zestafoni Khashuri N Supsa Baghdati Dusheti N 42° Kareli Akhmeta Kvareli 42° Ozurgeti Gori Kaspi Borzhomi Lagodekhi KEY Kobuleti GURIAGURIA Bakhmaro Borjomi TBILISITBILISI Telavi Abastumani Mtskheta Gurdzhaani Belokany USAID/OFDA DoD State/EUR/ACE Atskuri T'bilisi Î! Batumi 0 AJARIAAJARIA Iori ! Vale Akhaltsikhe Zakataly State/PRM
    [Show full text]