DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Lakewide Assessment Plan Survey Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 Lakewide Assessment Plan Survey Report 2016 Lakewide Assessment Plan Survey Report Report Number: 2017-04 Suggested Citation: Breeggemann, J. J., T. J. Treska, S. D. Hanson, and R. M. Wehse. 2017. 2016 Lakewide Assessment Plan Survey Report. Green Bay Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office Report number: 2017-04. March 2017 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Field Sampling ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Lab Processing ........................................................................................................................................... 6 Data Analyses ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Results ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Discussion ................................................................................................................................................... 10 References .................................................................................................................................................. 14 Photos from cover: Lifting gillnets onboard the Research Vessel Gaylord Nelson and GBFWCO staff holding a lake trout captured in an LWAP survey gill net. 3 Introduction The history of fishing and fisheries management in Lake Michigan has a storied past with periods of boom and bust within the fisheries and successes and failures within fisheries management. Lake Michigan was formed during the Wisconsin glaciation (the last great ice age) when the Laurentide ice sheet expanded south and covered the entire Great Lakes region with ice advancing into the Lake Michigan basin approximately 26,000 years ago (Larson and Schaetzl 2001; Johnson et al. 1997). Ice from the Laurentide ice sheet began to retreat about 20,000 years ago with the last ice sheets retreating from northern Lake Michigan approximately 12,000 years ago, resulting in the current borders of Lake Michigan (Larson and Schaetzl 2001; Johnson et al. 1997). It is estimated that humans began exploiting the bountiful fish resources available to them in Lake Michigan as early as 3,000‐4,000 years ago with the discovery of fish hooks, spears, gaff hooks that have been found in Native American archeological sites around the lake (Cleland 1982). Earliest evidence of the use of nets for fishing on the Great Lakes dates back 3,000 years ago with the discovery of nets and net weights at an archeological site dated to 630 B.C. (Cleland 1982). Some of the earliest accounts (i.e., from the 17th century) from European settlers in the upper Great Lakes region noted the skill and bountiful catches of the local Native Americans and as more and more European immigrants settled in the region, commercial fishing became a way of life for many on Lake Michigan (Cleland 1982). European immigrants began their commercial fishing operations using seines in near shore environments, but when near shore fisheries declined, fishermen switched to the European designed pound nets (Struwe 2016). Commercial fishing on Lake Michigan was revolutionized around the turn of the twentieth century as steam tugs with mechanical gill net lifters and large scale gill net fisheries became more prevalent (Struwe 2016). By the 1920s, the effect of commercial fishing could be seen as commercial catches of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) were 10‐20% of what they once were, lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) catches dropped from almost 4,000,000 pounds in 1880 to 9,000 pounds in 1922, lake herring (Coregonus artedi)/chub (Coregonus hoyi) fishing had stopped in many ports because none were caught, and fishermen had noted that perch (Perca flavesnces) and sucker (Catostomus spp.) were declining in abundance (Koelz 1926). What were once thought of as inexhaustible fisheries for many species in Lake Michigan left many fishermen looking to catch any species they could sell (e.g., suckers and carp [Cyprinus carpio]). Few fishing regulations combined with a lack of enforcement of those regulations resulted in the collapse of many Lake Michigan fisheries (MIDNR 2017) and the realization for the need for more intensive fisheries management and regulation in the future. As societies throughout the world became more industrialized and global markets formed, the Erie and Welland Canals were created to allow commercial shipping vessels access to all the Great Lakes. The creation of these two canals opened Lake Michigan to an unforeseen blow to the commercial fisheries within its waters. Sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus), a species native to the Atlantic Ocean, now had a way to bypass Niagara Falls and were first observed in Lake Michigan in 1936 or 1937 (GLFC 2015). As adults, sea lampreys are parasitic, attaching to fish and feeding on that host fish’s blood and bodily fluids (GLFC 2015). While most fish species in the Atlantic Ocean had co‐evolved with sea lampreys and therefore do not die when a sea lamprey attaches, fish species native to the Great Lakes had no defenses against sea 4 lamprey wounds and the results were catastrophic (GLFC 2015). By 1952, only 4,000 pounds of lake trout were harvested by commercial fishermen in Lake Michigan, a mere 0.06% of the weight of lake trout captured annually during the early 1900s (Eschmeyer 1957). Efforts to control sea lamprey began in the 1950s, and by the mid‐1960’s biologists had seen an 80‐90% reduction in the number of adult sea lampreys captured at index weirs (Holey et al. 1995). In an attempt to restore lake trout populations following sea lamprey control, biologists began annual stockings of 1‐2 million yearling equivalents of lake trout in Lake Michigan in the 1960s and increased their stocking efforts to 2.5 million lake trout equivalents annually by the mid‐1970s (Bronte et al. 2008). However, these stockings had little effect as no natural recruitment of lake trout was occurring. Alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus), another species native to the Atlantic Ocean that also gained access to the upper Great Lakes following the creation of the Welland and Erie Canals, became the dominant pelagic forage fish in Lake Michigan by the in the 1950s and 1960s. Alewives have much higher levels of thiaminase, an enzyme that destroys thiamine, than native prey fish species in Lake Michigan (Bronte et al. 2003) and research has shown that reduced thiamine levels in eggs of lake trout results in early mortality syndrome of newly hatched lake trout (Fisher et al. 1996; Bronte et al 2003; Honeyfield et al. 2005). With no top predators in Lake Michigan to act as a means of control, the alewife population exploded, overshot its carrying capacity, and then experienced massive die‐offs in Lake Michigan (Brown 1968). One of the largest die offs resulted in dead alewives being observed along the entire shoreline of Lake Michigan extending from Arcadia, Michigan, south through Indiana and Illinois waters, and ending in Sturgeon Bay, WI (Brown 1968). In hopes to find a way to control alewife populations and possibly create sport fishing opportunities, fisheries managers introduced two salmon species, coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) and chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), to Lake Michigan in 1966 and 1967, respectively (Eshenroder et al. 1995). Brown trout (Salmo trutta) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were also stocked in Lake Michigan to control alewives and provide fishing opportunities (Eshenroder et al. 1995) resulting in five salmonid species being stocked in the lake. By 1970, five state and federal agencies were stocking millions of salmonids into Lake Michigan each year and a booming sport fishery was created. However, during this time, many state management agencies were managing their waters independently with little collaborative effort between agencies. Furthermore, many management agencies were taking a single‐ species approach to managing their fisheries, meaning their management was focused on a single species of interest (Christie et al. 1987), and that species was chinook salmon. During the 1980s, some managers were proposing a more holistic (i.e., multi‐species or community management) approach to managing fisheries in Lake Michigan (e.g., Christie et al. 1987). However, it wasn’t until the collapse of the chinook salmon population in Lake Michigan in the late 1980s that most fisheries managers around Lake Michigan saw the need for a better understanding of the life history of the species being managed, a shift from single species management to multi‐species management, as well as the need for a collaborative management strategy among all agencies for all of Lake Michigan (Schneeberger et al. 1998). As a result of past management failures, the lakewide assessment plan (LWAP) for Lake Michigan fish communities was proposed by Schneeberger et al. (1998) with the goal of “annually assessing the Lake Michigan fish community in a coordinated, collaborative and standardized fashion”, targeting three key predators: lake trout, chinook salmon, and burbot (Lota lota). 5 Sampling protocols following the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coregonus Zenithicus) in Lake Superior
    Ann. Zool. Fennici 41: 147–154 ISSN 0003-455X Helsinki 26 February 2004 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2004 Status of the shortjaw cisco (Coregonus zenithicus) in Lake Superior Michael H. Hoff1 & Thomas N. Todd2* 1) U.S. Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, 2800 Lake Shore Drive East, Ashland, Wisconsin 54806, USA; present address: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fisheries Division, Federal Building, 1 Federal Drive, Ft. Snelling, Minnesota 55111, USA. 2) U.S. Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, 1451 Green Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA (*corresponding author) Received 26 Aug. 2002, revised version received 7 Mar. 2003, accepted 9 Sep. 2003 Hoff, M. H. & Todd, T. N. 2004: Status of the shortjaw cisco (Coregonus zenithicus) in Lake Supe- rior. — Ann. Zool. Fennici 41: 147–154. The shortjaw cisco (Coregonus zenithicus) was historically found in Lakes Huron, Michigan, and Superior, but has been extirpated in Lakes Huron and Michigan appar- ently as the result of commercial overharvest. During 1999–2001, we conducted an assessment of shortjaw cisco abundance in fi ve areas, spanning the U.S. waters of Lake Superior, and compared our results with the abundance measured at those areas in 1921–1922. The shortjaw cisco was found at four of the fi ve areas sampled, but abundances were so low that they were not signifi cantly different from zero. In the four areas where shortjaw ciscoes were found, abundance declined signifi cantly by 99% from the 1920s to the present. To increase populations of this once economically and ecologically important species in Lake Superior, an interagency rehabilitation effort is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Superior Food Web MENT of C
    ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S C .D R E E PA M RT OM Lake Superior Food Web MENT OF C Sea Lamprey Walleye Burbot Lake Trout Chinook Salmon Brook Trout Rainbow Trout Lake Whitefish Bloater Yellow Perch Lake herring Rainbow Smelt Deepwater Sculpin Kiyi Ruffe Lake Sturgeon Mayfly nymphs Opossum Shrimp Raptorial waterflea Mollusks Amphipods Invasive waterflea Chironomids Zebra/Quagga mussels Native waterflea Calanoids Cyclopoids Diatoms Green algae Blue-green algae Flagellates Rotifers Foodweb based on “Impact of exotic invertebrate invaders on food web structure and function in the Great Lakes: NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 4840 S. State Road, Ann Arbor, MI A network analysis approach” by Mason, Krause, and Ulanowicz, 2002 - Modifications for Lake Superior, 2009. 734-741-2235 - www.glerl.noaa.gov Lake Superior Food Web Sea Lamprey Macroinvertebrates Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). An aggressive, non-native parasite that Chironomids/Oligochaetes. Larval insects and worms that live on the lake fastens onto its prey and rasps out a hole with its rough tongue. bottom. Feed on detritus. Species present are a good indicator of water quality. Piscivores (Fish Eaters) Amphipods (Diporeia). The most common species of amphipod found in fish diets that began declining in the late 1990’s. Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pacific salmon species stocked as a trophy fish and to control alewife. Opossum shrimp (Mysis relicta). An omnivore that feeds on algae and small cladocerans.
    [Show full text]
  • Spawning Distribution of Bering Ciscoes in the Yukon River
    Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 144:292–299, 2015 American Fisheries Society 2015 ISSN: 0002-8487 print / 1548-8659 online DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2014.988881 ARTICLE Spawning Distribution of Bering Ciscoes in the Yukon River Randy J. Brown* and David W. Daum1 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 101 12th Avenue, Room 110, Fairbanks, Alaska 99701, USA Abstract Bering Ciscoes Coregonus laurettae are anadromous salmonids with known spawning populations only in the Yukon, Kuskokwim, and Susitna rivers in Alaska. A commercial fishery for the species was recently initiated at the mouth of the Yukon River, inspiring a series of research projects to enhance our understanding of the exploited population. This study was designed to delineate the geographic spawning distribution of Bering Ciscoes in the Yukon River. One hundred radio transmitters per year in 2012 and 2013 were deployed in prespawning Bering Ciscoes at a site located 1,176 km upstream from the sea. A total of 160 fish survived fish wheel capture and tagging, avoided harvest and predation after tagging, and continued migrating upstream to their spawning destinations. Approximately 79% migrated to spawn in the upper Yukon Flats, upstream from the mouth of the Porcupine River, and 21% migrated to spawn in the lower Yukon Flats. Locating the Bering Cisco spawning area, which is almost entirely encompassed by the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, enhances our ability to protect it from anthropogenic disturbance and enables future biological research on the spawning population. Conservation of migratory fish in large rivers requires an removing gravel from fish spawning habitats has been shown understanding of habitat use across a species’ range and the to reduce spawning success (Fudge and Bodaly 1984; Meng ability to manage anthropogenic impacts to essential habitats and Muller€ 1988), which could jeopardize the viability of such as migration routes and spawning areas (Gross 1987; affected populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ours to Save: the Distribution, Status & Conservation Needs of Canada's Endemic Species
    Ours to Save The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species June 4, 2020 Version 1.0 Ours to Save: The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species Additional information and updates to the report can be found at the project website: natureconservancy.ca/ourstosave Suggested citation: Enns, Amie, Dan Kraus and Andrea Hebb. 2020. Ours to save: the distribution, status and conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species. NatureServe Canada and Nature Conservancy of Canada. Report prepared by Amie Enns (NatureServe Canada) and Dan Kraus (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Mapping and analysis by Andrea Hebb (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Cover photo credits (l-r): Wood Bison, canadianosprey, iNaturalist; Yukon Draba, Sean Blaney, iNaturalist; Salt Marsh Copper, Colin Jones, iNaturalist About NatureServe Canada A registered Canadian charity, NatureServe Canada and its network of Canadian Conservation Data Centres (CDCs) work together and with other government and non-government organizations to develop, manage, and distribute authoritative knowledge regarding Canada’s plants, animals, and ecosystems. NatureServe Canada and the Canadian CDCs are members of the international NatureServe Network, spanning over 80 CDCs in the Americas. NatureServe Canada is the Canadian affiliate of NatureServe, based in Arlington, Virginia, which provides scientific and technical support to the international network. About the Nature Conservancy of Canada The Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) works to protect our country’s most precious natural places. Proudly Canadian, we empower people to safeguard the lands and waters that sustain life. Since 1962, NCC and its partners have helped to protect 14 million hectares (35 million acres), coast to coast to coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Trends of Prey Fish Populations in Lake Michigan (2004)
    Lake Michigan Committee March 22, 2005 Status and Trends of Prey Fish Populations in Lake Michigan, 20041 Charles P. Madenjian, David B. Bunnell, Timothy J. Desorcie, Jeffrey D. Holuszko, and Jean V. Adams U. S. Geological Survey Great Lakes Science Center 1451 Green Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105 Abstract The Great Lakes Science Center (GLSC) has conducted lake-wide surveys of the fish community in Lake Michigan each fall since 1973 using standard 12-m bottom trawls towed along contour at depths of 9 to 110 m at each of seven to nine index transects. The resulting data on relative abundance, size structure, and condition of individual fishes are used to estimate various population parameters that are in turn used by state and tribal agencies in managing Lake Michigan fish stocks. All seven established index transects of the lake-wide survey were completed in 2004. Alewife abundance decreased substantially between 2003 and 2004, as estimated lake-wide biomass dropped from 43.234 kilotonnes (kt) (1 kt = 1000 metric tons) in 2003 to 13.721 kt in 2004. Catch of adult alewives in 2004 was dominated by the 1998 year- class. Lake-wide biomasses of bloater, deepwater sculpin, slimy sculpin, and rainbow smelt in 2004 were estimated at 34.321 kt, 26.519 kt, 3.658 kt, and 1.854 kt, respectively. Bloater biomass drastically declined between 1989 and 2004. Abundance of juvenile bloaters in 2004 was the highest juvenile bloater abundance observed since 1991. Rainbow smelt biomass declined during 1992-1997, and has remained low since 1997. Deepwater sculpin biomass has shown neither an increasing nor decreasing trend from 1990 to 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Coregonus Nigripinnis) in Northern Algonquin Provincial Park
    HABITAT PREFERENCES AND FEEDING ECOLOGY OF BLACKFIN CISCO (COREGONUS NIGRIPINNIS) IN NORTHERN ALGONQUIN PROVINCIAL PARK A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Arts and Science Trent University Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Allan Henry Miller Bell 2017 Environmental and Life Sciences M.Sc. Graduate Program September 2017 ABSTRACT Depth Distribution and Feeding Structure Differentiation of Blackfin Cisco (Coregonus nigripinnis) In Northern Algonquin Provincial Park Allan Henry Miller Bell Blackfin Cisco (Coregonus nigripinnis), a deepwater cisco species once endemic to the Laurentian Great Lakes, was discovered in Algonquin Provincial Park in four lakes situated within a drainage outflow of glacial Lake Algonquin. Blackfin habitat preference was examined by analyzing which covariates best described their depth distribution using hurdle models in a multi-model approach. Although depth best described their distribution, the nearly isothermal hypolimnion in which Blackfin reside indicated a preference for cold-water habitat. Feeding structure differentiation separated Blackfin from other coregonines, with Blackfin possessing the most numerous (50-66) gill rakers, and, via allometric regression, the longest gill rakers and lower gill arches. Selection for feeding efficiency may be a result of Mysis diluviana affecting planktonic size structure in lakes containing Blackfin Cisco, an effect also discovered in Lake Whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis). This thesis provides insight into the habitat preferences and feeding ecology of Blackfin and provides a basis for future study. Keywords: Blackfin Cisco, Lake Whitefish, coregonine, Mysis, habitat, feeding ecology, hurdle models, allometric regression, Algonquin Provincial Park ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my supervisor Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Reintroduction of Fishes in Canada: a Review of Research Progress for SARA-Listed Species
    Environmental Reviews Reintroduction of fishes in Canada: a review of research progress for SARA-listed species Journal: Environmental Reviews Manuscript ID er-2019-0010.R1 Manuscript Type: Review Date Submitted by the 08-Apr-2019 Author: Complete List of Authors: Lamothe, Karl; Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Drake, D. Andrew; Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Pitcher, Trevor; University of Windsor, Great Lakes Institute for EnvironmentalDraft Research Broome, Jeremy; Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Bedford Institute of Oceanography Dextrase, Alan; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Natural Resources Conservation Policy Branch Gillespie, Ashley; Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Species at Risk Program Mandrak, Nicholas; University of Toronto at Scarborough Department of Biological Sciences Poesch, Mark; University of Alberta, Department of Renewable Resources Reid, Scott; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, Aquatic Research and Monitoring Section Vachon, Nathalie; Québec Ministère des Forêts de la Faune et des Parcs Is this manuscript invited for consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue?: Keyword: Canada, conservation, endangered, freshwater fish, Species at Risk https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/er-pubs Page 1 of 113 Environmental Reviews 1 Title: Reintroduction of fishes in Canada: a review of research progress for SARA-listed species 2 Authors: Karl A. Lamothe1*, D. Andrew R. Drake1, Trevor E. Pitcher2, Jeremy E. Broome3, 3 Alan
    [Show full text]
  • Call Numbers for Salmonidae
    CALL NUMBERS FOR SALMONIDAE Use this chart for the special breakdown of QL638.S2. The names in boldface represent authorized Library of Congress subject headings. Works on ciscoes, salmon, trout, and whitefish using these common names but covering species within one genus will be classed under the specific genus. Made-up example: Title: Guide to trouts. Subjects: Cutthroat (Oncorhynchus clarkii), rainbow trout (O. mykiss), and Apache trout (O. apache). Class under: Oncorhynchus (.S25) Works on ciscoes, salmon, trout, and whitefish covering species which belong to more than one genus but which fall collectively under one of these common names will be classed under the Cutter for the common name. Made-up example: Title: Guide to trouts. Subjects: Cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii), brown trout (Salmo trutta), and lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush). Class under: “trout” (.S216) The fishes are arranged by scientific (Latin) nomenclature. Only the most current standard scientific (Latin) name is given. Obsolete and debated scientific names are numerous. Adjustments to taxonomical classification are not uncommon, including reclassification to a different genus. The previous or alternative versions of common (vernacular) names are shown. Be aware that some market names (those used commercially) are scientifically incorrect. For brevity, this table excludes some species and races, particularly under Coregonus and Salvelinus. ARLIS Call Numbers for Salmonidae under QL638 Salmonidae Salmonidae (in general or two or more genuses) .S2 Coregonidae
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater And
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Shortjaw Cisco (Coregonus Zenithicus) in Alberta
    Status of the Shortjaw Cisco (Coregonus zenithicus) in Alberta Mark Steinhilber Alberta Wildlife Status Report No. 41 March 2002 Published By: i Publication No. T/014 ISBN: 0-7785-1983-X (Printed Edition) ISBN: 0-7785-1984-8 (On-line Edition) ISSN: 1206-4912 (Printed Edition) ISSN: 1499-4682 (On-line Edition) Series Editors: Sherry Feser and Robin Gutsell Illustrations: Brian Huffman For copies of this report, contact: Information Centre - Publications Alberta Environment/Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Division Main Floor, Great West Life Building 9920 - 108 Street Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5K 2M4 Telephone: (780) 422-2079 OR Information Service Alberta Environment/Alberta Sustainable Resource Development #100, 3115 - 12 Street NE Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2E 7J2 Telephone: (780) 297-3362 OR Visit our web site at : http://www3.gov.ab.ca/srd/fw/status/index.html This publication may be cited as: Steinhilber, M. 2002. Status of the Shortjaw Cisco (Coregonus zenithicus) in Alberta. Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Fish and Wildlife Division, and Alberta Conservation Association, Wildlife Status Report No. 41, Edmonton, AB. 23 pp. ii PREFACE Every five years, the Fish and Wildlife Division of Alberta Sustainable Resource Development reviews the status of wildlife species in Alberta. These overviews, which have been conducted in 1991, 1996 and 2000, assign individual species “ranks” that reflect the perceived level of risk to populations that occur in the province. Such designations are determined from extensive consultations with professional and amateur biologists, and from a variety of readily available sources of population data. A primary objective of these reviews is to identify species that may be considered for more detailed status determinations.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Strategy for the Shortnose Cisco in Ontario
    Illustration: Paul Vecsei Shortnose Cisco (Coregonus reighardi) in Ontario Ontario Recovery Strategy Series 2018 Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks About the Ontario Recovery Strategy Series This series presents the collection of recovery strategies that are prepared or adopted as advice to the Province of Ontario on the recommended approach to recover species at risk. The Province ensures the preparation of recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Endangered Species Act 2007 (ESA) and the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada. What is recovery? What’s next? Recovery of species at risk is the process by Nine months after the completion of a recovery which the decline of an endangered, threatened, strategy a government response statement will or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, be published which summarizes the actions that and threats are removed or reduced to improve the Government of Ontario intends to take in the likelihood of a species’ persistence in the response to the strategy. The implementation of wild. recovery strategies depends on the continued cooperation and actions of government agencies, individuals, communities, land users, and What is a recovery strategy? conservationists. Under the ESA a recovery strategy provides the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to achieve recovery of a species. A For more information recovery strategy outlines the habitat needs To learn more about species at risk recovery and the threats to the survival and recovery of in Ontario, please visit the Ministry of the the species. It also makes recommendations Environment, Conservation, and Parks Species at on the objectives for protection and recovery, Risk webpage at: www.ontario.ca/speciesatrisk the approaches to achieve those objectives, and the area that should be considered in the development of a habitat regulation.
    [Show full text]