DOCSLIB.ORG

13Th Annual International Conference on Contracts Conference Program

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
13Th Annual International Conference on Contracts Conference Program 13th Annual International Conference on Contracts Conference Program Friday, February 23 8:00 - 8:45 a.m. Registration (Lobby) and American Breakfast Legal Advocacy Center lobby & 3rd floor event room 8:45 - 9:00 a.m. Welcome and Opening Remarks (Dean Leticia M. Diaz) Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 111 9:00 - 10:30 a.m. Panel Session 1 (Concurrent Sessions) The Future of Contracts, Contract Law, and Contracts Scholarship Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 111 • Michael T. Morley (moderator), Barry University School of Law • Daniel D. Barnhizer, Michigan State University College of Law, Automation of Contract Law and Dispute Resolution: Case Study in Corpus Linguistics Applications in Analyzing Contracts Arbitrability Decisions • Mark Edwin Burge, Texas A&M University School of Law, Masters of Jurisprudence? Contract Law Bargains for a New Audience • Jeffrey Lipshaw, Suffolk University Law School, The Persistence of Dumb Contracts (and Law) • Val D. Ricks, South Texas College of Law Houston, Contract Law Scholarship and Collaboration Contract Interpretation and Construction Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 110 • Frederick B. Jonassen (moderator), Barry University School of Law • Omri Ben-Shahar, University of Chicago Law School, Interpreting Contracts via Surveys and Experiments • Steven J. Burton, The University of Iowa College of Law, Traynor, Corbin and Humpty Dumpty • Milva Finnegan, PhD Candidate & Researcher, University of Vaasa, From a Natural Language to a Controlled Contract Language • Amir Pichhadze, (via Skype) Deakin Law School, Contract Interpretation in Transfer Pricing Law: Lessons for the United States Post-BEPS 10:30-10:45 a.m. Break 10:45 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. Panel Session 2 (Plenary Session) Barry Law Review Symposium Panel: A Half-Century of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (a panel in honor of Professors White and Summers) Moot Courtroom • Victor P. Goldberg (moderator), Columbia Law School, Remedies in the UCC: Some Critical Thoughts • Lisa Bernstein (via Skype), University of Chicago Law School, The Myth of Trade Usage • Robert A. Hillman, Cornell Law School, Article 2 of the UCC: Some Thoughts on Success or Failure in the Twenty-First Century • Steven D. Walt, University of Virginia School of Law • James J. White, University of Michigan Law School, The Revision of Article 2: Commercial Sellers vs. Consumer Buyers 12:30 - 1:45 p.m. Lunch Including presentation by the Honorable Donald A. Myers, Jr., Circuit Court Judge, Ninth Judicial Circuit, on the Complex Business Litigation Court Legal Advocacy Center 3rd floor event room 1:50 – 3:20 p.m. Panel Session 3 (Concurrent Sessions) Commercial Transactions Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 111 • Franklin G. Snyder (moderator), Texas A&M University School of Law • J. David Canarie, Jr., Unum Group, Trends in Commercial Contracting • Sidney DeLong, Seattle University School of Law, The Notice- Forfeiture Rule of § 2-607(3)(a): An Anachronism in Search of a New Career • Henry Gabriel Jr., Elon University School of Law, Uniform Commercial Code Article Two Revisions: The View of the Trenches • Soterios Loizou, King’s College London, The Dickson Poon School of Law, Balancing National, Regional and International Law: The International Sales Law Experience Theoretical Perspectives Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 110 • Enrique Guerra-Pujol (moderator), University of Central Florida, College of Business Administration • Hao Jiang, Tulane University Law School, Substantive Unfairness as Unconscionable • Chunlin Leonhard, Loyola University (New Orleans) College of Law, The Inconsistencies of Consent • Chaim Saiman, Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law, The Domain of Private Law: An Anglo-American Comparison 3:20 - 3:35 p.m. Break 3:35 – 5:20 p.m. Panel Session 4 (Concurrent Sessions) Adding Transactional Skills to Law School Classes Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 111 • Martha Ertman (moderator/panelist), University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law • Deborah Cupples, University of Florida Levin College of Law • Patricia Ann Redmond (via Skype), University of Miami Bankruptcy Clinic • Tina L. Stark, Professor in the Practice of Law (retired) • Kevin Tu, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law Reconsidering Remedies Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 110 • Hila Keren (moderator), Southwestern Law School • Yehuda Adar, University of Haifa, Disgorgement for Opportunistic Breach as Corrective Justice • Omri Ben-Shahar, University of Chicago Law School, The Restoration Remedy in Private Law: A Novel Approach to Compensation for Emotional Harm • Sarah Dadush, Rutgers Law School – Newark, The Law of Identity Harm • Michael T. Morley, Barry University School of Law, Equitable Remedies in Contract and Quasi-Contract • Eric A. Zacks, Wayne State University Law School, Fee-Shifting Provisions in Mortgage Foreclosures 6:45- 9:30 p.m. Reception/Dinner at Ceviche Tapas Bar & Restaurant (including Lifetime Achievement Awards for Professors James J. White and Robert S. Summers, and Trivia Contest by Earth Trivia) Saturday, February 24 8:00 – 8:45 a.m. Registration and Waffle & Pancake Breakfast Legal Advocacy Center lobby & 3rd floor event room 8:45 – 10:30 a.m. Panel Session 5 (Concurrent Sessions) Judge Posner and Contract Law Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 111 • Michael P. Malloy (moderator), University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law, Introduction: Posner by the Numbers • Robert Brain, Loyola Law School (Los Angeles), Correcting Drafting “Errors” or Rewriting the Law?: The Jurisprudence of Judge Posner • Deborah R. Gerhardt, University of North Carolina School of Law, Posner and Irrational Behavior • Victor P. Goldberg, Columbia Law School, Three by Posner • Jeffrey L. Harrison, University of Florida Levin College of Law, Posner’s Impact on Contract Law Teaching the Contracts Course: Strategies, Techniques, and Ideas for Consideration Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 110 • Howard Katz (moderator/panelist), Cleveland-Marshall College of Law • David A. Grenardo, St. Mary’s University School of Law • Colin P. Marks, St. Mary’s University School of Law • Jennifer S. Martin, St. Thomas University School of Law 10:30-10:45 a.m. Break 10:45 a.m. – 12:15 p.m. Panel Session 6 (Concurrent Sessions) Pseudo-Contract and Shared Meaning Analysis Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 111 • Robin B. Kar, University of Illinois College of Law • Margaret Jane Radin, University of Toronto; University of Michigan Law School (emerita) • Carol Chomsky (commentator), University of Minnesota Law School • Robert A. Hillman (commentator), Cornell Law School • Lauren Scholz (commentator), Florida State University College of Law Law and Economics Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 110 • Jeffrey L. Harrison (moderator), University of Florida Levin College of Law • Yonathan Arbel, University of Alabama School of Law, On Contracts, Reputation, and Enforcement • Victor P. Goldberg, Columbia Law School, The Application of Economic Reasoning to Remedies • Peter M. Gerhart (commentator), Case Western Reserve University School of Law • Wentong Zheng (commentator), University of Florida Levin College of Law 12:15 – 1:30 p.m. Lunch Including presentation by Tina L. Stark on antique English indentures, plus a show and tell Legal Advocacy Center, 3rd floor event room 1:35 – 3:05 p.m. Panel Session 7 (Concurrent Sessions) Contract Law and Discrimination Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 111 • Dov A. Waisman (moderator), Southwestern Law School • Emily M.S. Houh, University of Cincinnati College of Law • Hila Keren, Southwestern Law School • Sean M. Scott, Loyola Law School (Los Angeles) Good Faith and other Default Rules Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 110 • Deborah Zalesne (moderator), CUNY School of Law • Daniele Bertolini, Ryerson University, Ted Rogers School of Management, Decomposing Bhasin v Hrynew: Toward an Institutional Understanding of the General Organizing Principle of Good Faith in Contractual Performance • Mateusz Grochowski, Resident Fellow, Information Society Project, Yale Law School, Sharing Economy and Privately-Created Default Rules • Stephen L. Sepinuck, Gonzaga University School of Law, The Various Standards for the “Good Faith” of a Purchaser • Dr. Qi Zhou (George), University of Leeds School of Law, Regulating Contractual Discretion: Rationales and Legal Instruments 3:05 - 3:15 p.m. Break 3:15 – 5:00 p.m. Panel Session 8 (Concurrent Sessions) Contracts and Business Organizations Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 111 • Daniel D. Barnhizer (moderator), Michigan State University College of Law • Shawn J. Bayern, Florida State University College of Law, Enabling Artificial Intelligence by Contract • Yael Efron, Zefat Academic College School of Law, After the Ink is Dry • Meredith R. Miller, Touro College, Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center, Should Limited Liability Company (“LLC”) Statutes Allow Oral Operating Agreements? • Reem Radhi, Durham Law School (UK), Deferred Prosecution Agreements: Reform to Reduce Corporate Crime and Create Norm Compliant Behaviour? • Gastón de los Reyes, Jr., The George Washington University School of Business, Fitting the Formalities into the Default Rule Project Consumer Protection Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 110 • Keith Rowley (moderator), University of Nevada Las Vegas William S. Boyd School of Law • Wayne Barnes, Texas A&M University School of Law, Negative Online Reviews, the Consumer Review Freedom Act, and the Potential Role of Contract Doctrine • Samuel I. Becher, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Accounting and Commercial Law, The Problem of Firms’ Pro- Consumer Behavior • Enrique Guerra-Pujol, University of Central Florida, College of Business Administration, Is the Hadley Rule Good or Bad for Consumers? A Bayesian view • Lucille M. Ponte, Florida Coastal School of Law, Revising Consumer Contracts of Adhesion under the CRFA • Lauren Scholz, Florida State University College of Law, Consumer Algorithmic Contracts 5:00- 5:15 p.m. Closing Remarks Legal Advocacy Center, room LAC 111 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visiting Scholars: Further Information Updated October 2017
    1 Visiting Scholars: Further information Updated October 2017 Introduction Durham Law School welcomes applications to its Visiting Scholars Programme. The School is widely- acknowledged to be one of the leading Law Schools in the UK and is a recognised centre of international excellence in legal scholarship and research. It has particular research strengths in the following areas: human rights; commercial law; criminal law and justice; European Union law; gender and legal theory; medical law and bioethics as supported by the numerous research centres and groups. Visiting Scholars will be based at Durham for a period from a week to a year. We give preference to applications for visits of up to three months, though we will consider applications for longer stays in order to allow Scholars to engage in research with academics working in related fields. Scholars are expected to pursue a specific research project while within the School and both to deliver and participate in research seminars. The School does not provide financial support for travel, accommodation or subsistence. Scholars are responsible for ensuring that they have the correct travel documentation, including visas. Admissions Because of the large number of applications we receive each year, Durham Law School is unable to accommodate all those who express interest in visiting for research purposes. Prospective visiting scholars must identify a possible sponsor in his / her area of research and contact them prior to submitting an application to be a visiting scholar at the Law School. Once that sponsor has been identified, applications should ask the sponsor for a brief statement of support.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Relational Law of Contracts: Striking a Balance Between Abstraction and Contextualism
    Legal Studies (2021), 41, 177–193 doi:10.1017/lst.2020.23 RESEARCH ARTICLE Developing a relational law of contracts: striking a balance between abstraction and contextualism Zoe Gounari*† Durham Law School, Durham University, Durham, UK *Author email: [email protected] (Accepted 20 May 2020) Abstract Relational contract theory holds that the interpretation of a contract must take full account of the context and surrounding circumstances of the parties’ bargain so as to give effect to their respective intentions. This paper argues that if a relational treatment of contracts is to be institutionalised, in the sense of being utilised in a contract dispute to determine and give effect to the parties’ intentions, then it must operate at an abstract level. That is to say, rather than using relevant context to determine what the actual parties intended in the circumstances at hand, the contextualist enquiry should ascertain the relevant con- text by reference to what the parties would have agreed to in the circumstances, had they properly reflected on what their self-interest requires. I discuss the merits of this proposition by reference to a number of appellate judgments, which already endorse contextualism as a response to contractual ambiguity, and I ultimately apply it to the Supreme Court’s judgment in Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank. Keywords: relational contracts; contract theory; contract interpretation Introduction The ‘relational contract’ recently became the basis for controversy in English contract law, when Lord Leggatt, sitting at first instance, relied on this concept to justify implying a duty of good faith into an oral contract between two highly sophisticated parties.1 The contract concerned a joint venture formed between an investor and an hotelier for the purpose of buying and developing a number of luxury hotels in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses Towards a Human-Centred International Law: Self-Determination and the Structure of the International Legal System SPARKS, THOMAS,MATTHEW,SMITH How to cite: SPARKS, THOMAS,MATTHEW,SMITH (2017) Towards a Human-Centred International Law: Self-Determination and the Structure of the International Legal System, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12408/ Use policy This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 3.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Towards a Human-Centred International Law: Self-Determination and the Structure of the International Legal System Thomas Matthew Smith Sparks Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Durham Law School Durham University Palatine Centre Stockton Road Durham 2017 Abstract In recent years a number of scholars (most notably Anne Peters, Christian Tomuschat, Ruti Teitel and Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade) have identified an ongoing process of change in the international legal system’s relationship with individuals and groups of individuals. That change has been referred to as a humanisation of international law. This thesis contributes to that area of study by offering an account of the deep level changes to the foundations of the international legal system, which it argues are both driving and are recursively driven by changes in substantive international law. It finds the explanation for these changes in the idea of the self-determination of the individual, and it argues that this concept has now become a structural principle (a term borrowed from Giddens, 1984) of the international legal system.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Paper 2 2016
    Neo-FEDERALISM Working Paper Series 02/2016 Speaking the State: Collective Personality, Legal Subjecthood and the Creation of States in International Law Tom Sparks Abstract States, their nature, and their creation, have rightly been the subjects of much study in recent years. States are the primary actors of the international legal system, and are its authors. In their system-compliant, system-constitutive and extra-legal actions they exercise immense power, with the ability vastly to change the conditions of life for individuals both within and outside their territories. Questions surrounding whether entities of various kinds qualify as “States” include some of international law’s bitterest disputes – such as the status of Kosovo, Nagorno-Karabakh, and SADR – as well as some of its most intriguing questions – such as the correct status to be accorded to the European Union, multinational corporations, and “failed States”. Yet it is far from clear that States, as collective entities, are truly capable of exercising legal personality at all. This article will focus on the question of whether States are capable of exercising international personhood for the purposes of subjecthood. In the course of answering that question a secondary question will also be explored: how States are created. Insight into these questions can be gained from sociology and linguistics. States, it is argued, are social constructions, created in their social reality by declarations – linguistic acts with a double (world-word and word-world) direction of fit. As such, it is argued that the creation of plenary statehood is regulated primarily by language rules, rather than legal norms.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law Melbourne Law School the University of Melbourne Annual Report January–December 2018
    Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law Melbourne Law School ANNUAL REPORT 2018 Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law Melbourne Law School The University of Melbourne Annual Report January–December 2018 Enquiries concerning the Centre’s activities and publications may be directed to: Kaori Kano, Centre Administrator Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law Melbourne Law School The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010 Phone: (03) 8344 8924 Email: [email protected] Web: law.unimelb.edu.au/centres/celrl Twitter: @CELRL_Melbourne Report prepared and edited by Alysia Blackham, Anna Chapman, Tess Hardy, Lisa Hodgkin and Kaori Kano of the Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law. © Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law 2019 All images are copyright of the Centre for Employment and Labour Relations Law and the University of Melbourne. Printed in Australia CONTENTS FOREWORD 2 OBJECTIVES OF THE CENTRE FOR EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS LAW 4 CO-DIRECTORS 5 MEMBERS 6 CENTRE SPONSORS 15 VISITORS 16 RESEARCH 17 TEACHING AND LEARNING 21 KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 22 CONFERENCE AND SEMINAR PAPERS 28 PUBLICATIONS 30 SUMMARY OF CENTRE GENERAL ACCOUNT 2018 32 FOREWORD 2018 was another year of strong performance of the Centre. CENTRE REVIEW, ADVISORY BOARD year to a young researcher under the age of 45 who conducts AND PERSONNEL research aimed at solving global challenges within the fields of health, development, environment and equality in all aspects of All research centres at the University of Melbourne are reviewed human life. against a number of strategic criteria every five years. A review of the Centre was conducted in late 2018, with the independent Alysia Blackham was awarded the Phillipa Weeks Prize for the panel reporting very favourably on the work and direction of the Best Paper by an Early Career Scholar presented at the 2018 Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing Here at Durham University
    Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing Annual Report 2019 Meet the Wolfson Team ................................................................................................ 4 Professor Amanda Ellison .......................................................................................... 4 Mrs Suzanne Boyd...................................................................................................... 4 Special Interest Groups .................................................................................................. 5 Teesside Aneurysm Group ......................................................................................... 5 Smoking Special Interest Group ................................................................................. 6 Pain SIG Report – Chronic pain: now and the future ................................................. 8 Physical Activity Special Interest Group .................................................................. 10 Stroke Special Interest Group .................................................................................. 13 Reports from Centres and Units .................................................................................. 14 Centre for the History of Medicine and Disease (CHMD) ........................................ 14 The Durham Infancy and Sleep Centre .................................................................... 15 Centre for Death and Life Studies ............................................................................ 17 Centre
    [Show full text]
  • International Prospectus 2019 1
    International Prospectus 2019 1 ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE INTERNATIONAL PROSPECTUS 2019 2 International Prospectus 2019 “I met some amazing people in Durham, who enriched me as a better person. They’ve been nothing but inspiring and supportive. There were plenty of events to join literally every day, which is one of the benefts of having the collegiate system. The diverse workshops and seminars have helped me prepare for my future career. The societies and clubs have helped with my skills in other areas.” Juliet Lei, Education MA graduate International Prospectus 2019 3 WHY DURHAM? CONTENTS Durham University offers a wide range of courses and a GETTING TO KNOW DURHAM UNIVERSITY research-informed education, delivered by world-leading Why Durham? 03 A Global University 10 experts in outstanding facilities. We offer supportive Our Location 04 Study at Durham 12 college communities, a warm welcome to all, excellent Durham City 06 University student welfare and a fantastic student experience. Durham City and 08 North East England Located in the beautiful and historic city of Durham, we are one of the oldest universities in the UK, yet have a modern and forward OUR COURSES thinking mindset. Anthropology 14 Government and 44 With over 26 academic departments and schools offering over 200 Archaeology 16 International Affairs undergraduate courses as well as postgraduate taught and research Biosciences 18 History 46 degrees, our teaching is research-informed and led by academics, Business 20 Law 48 many of whom are world-leading experts in their feld. Chemistry 24 Liberal Arts 50 Mathematics 52 Durham is a collegiate university, which means your student experience Classics and Ancient 26 will be distinctive and based in one of our 17 college communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Law School Is a Centre of International Excellence in Both Legal Scholarship and Research
    Durham Law Sch ool Ranked 5th Pos tgraduate study oppo rtunities 2 01 2/13 for Law by The Independent Complete World-class taught and research degrees to PhD University Guide 2 01 2. 5th for Law by The Independent Complete University Guide 201 2. Law Durham Law School is a centre of international excellence in both legal scholarship and research. A Durham postgraduate Law qualification will provide you with an excellent foundation for a career in the legal profession. ABOUT THE SCHOOL The main part of the Law School is MAIN AREAS OF RESEARCH Durham Law School was ranked fourth located just a few yards from Durham’s The Durham Law School is one of highest Law School in the UK in the ancient castle and from our own the UK’s leading centres for legal 2008 Research Assessment Exercise, dedicated law library. Our postgraduate research and provides a dynamic and having returned 100% of its staff in office is opposite the County Court. vibrant environment for developing the RAE. The ranking is based on the Our excellent library resources include your research interests. percentage of submissions graded 4* electronic access to journals, case law The following is a brief overview of the (world-class). and update services through databases major areas of research in the School, such as HeinOnline, Westlaw, Durham Law School has particular but these are not the only areas in which LexisNexis and other Butterworths’ strength in the areas represented by our staff are research active. We would packages, as well as hundreds of direct the Human Rights Centre (HRC), the encourage you to refer to staff profiles electronic law journal subscriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • European Public Law
    EUROPEAN PUBLIC LAW Volume 15 March 2009 Number 1 Rapports BELGIUM The Brussels-Halle-Vilvoorde Question: A Linguistic Trap Patrick Peeters, Jens Mosselmans 5 ISRAEL The Governmental Commission of Inquiry for the Second Lebanon War, 2007 Suzie Navot 17 SCOTLAND Scotland’s Constitutional Future Tom Mullen 33 Scrutiny Beyond Participation: Administrative-Law Type Mechanisms in Global Environmental Governance. Toward a New Basis of Legitimacy? Francesca Spagnuolo 49 Articles Evidence and National Security: ‘Belief Evidence’ in the Irish Special Criminal Court Liz Heffernan 65 A New Status for the ECHR in Italy Silvia Mirate 89 ‘Free Speech is not Valued if only Valued Speech is Free’: Connolly, Consistency and some Article 10 Concerns Paul Wragg 111 Book Reviews 133 Published by: Kluwer Law International PO Box 316 2400 AH Alphen aan den Rijn The Netherlands Website: www.kluwerlaw.com Sold and distributed in North, Central and South America by: Aspen Publishers, Inc. 7201 McKinney Circle Frederick, MD 21704 United States of America Email: [email protected] Sold and distributed in all other countries by: Turpin Distribution Services Ltd. Stratton Business Park Pegasus Drive, Biggleswade Bedfordshire SG18 8TQ United Kingdom Email: [email protected] European Public Law is published quarterly (March, June, September and December). Subscription rates, including postage (2009): EUR 424/USD 565/GBP 312. European Public Law is indexed/abstracted in the European Legal Journals Index. Printed on acid-free paper. ISSN 1354-3725 © 2009 Kluwer Law International BV, The Netherlands All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law
    Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law Publication Copyright and open-access policy The Cambridge Journal of International The CJICL is an open-access publication gov- and Comparative Law is an open- erned by our publishing and licensing agree- access publication available online at ment. Any commercial use and any form of <http://www.cjicl.org.uk>. Each volume con- republication of material not covered by the sists of two or more general issues and a spe- cial issue examining the jurisprudence of the applicable license is subject to the express per- UK Supreme Court. mission of the Editors-in-Chief. Editorial Policy Contact information All submissions are subject to a double-blind Cambridge Journal of International and Com- peer-review editorial process by our Aca- parative Law demic Review Board and/or our Editorial Faculty of Law, 10 West Road Team. Cambridge, CB3 9DZ Submissions United Kingdom The journal accepts the following types of manuscript: E-mail: [email protected] (i) Long Articles between 6,000 and 12,000 Web: http://www.cjicl.org.uk words but not exceeding 12,000 words in- cluding footnotes; Typeset in Crimson and Gentium Book Basic, (ii) Short Articles not exceeding 5,000 words distributed under the terms of the SIL Open Font including footnotes; (iii) Case Notes not exceeding 3,000 words License, available at <http://scripts.sil.org/OFL>. including footnotes; and (iv) Book Reviews not exceeding 2,500 words including footnotes. Please visit our website for submission details. ISSN 2050-1706 (Print) ISSN
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Pdf/Digital Abuse of Women Information Guide.Pdf
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 31 October 2017 Version of attached le: Published Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: McGlynn, Clare and Rackley, Erika and Houghton , Ruth (2017) 'Beyond 'Revenge Porn' : the continuum of image-based sexual abuse.', Feminist legal studies., 25 (1). pp. 25-46. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-017-9343-2 Publisher's copyright statement: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Fem Leg Stud (2017) 25:25–46 DOI 10.1007/s10691-017-9343-2 Beyond ‘Revenge Porn’: The Continuum of Image- Based Sexual Abuse 1 2 1 Clare McGlynn • Erika Rackley • Ruth Houghton Published online: 16 March 2017 Ó The Author(s) 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Scholarships, Prizes, Bursaries and Personal Development Awards 2009/10
    SCHOLARSHIPS, PRIZES, BURSARIES AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT AWARDS 2009/10 SCHOLARSHIPS, PRIZES, BURSARIES AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT AWARDS ENTRANCE SCHOLARSHIPS TWENTY FIVE VICE-CHANCELLOR'S SCHOLARSHIPS FOR SPORT, MUSIC AND THE PERFORMING ARTS, to the value of £2,000 each, will be awarded on entry to full-time home undergraduate students who have demonstrated excellence in the fields of sport, music and the arts. For further information, please see www.durham.ac.uk. CHORAL SCHOLARSHIPS, to the value of £1,500 a year, are awarded annually by the Chapter of Durham Cathedral in conjunction with the University. Choral Scholars will be expected to sing in the Cathedral Choir at Matins and Holy Communion on Sunday mornings, and Evensong daily, except Monday. Further information may be obtained from the Senior Student Financial Support Secretary, University Office, Durham, DH1 3HP. Entries should be received by the Senior Student Financial Support Secretary before mid December. Interviews are held in mid February. (It is regretted that Choral Scholarships are not normally awarded to science students whose heavy laboratory commitments are not compatible with the duties of a choral scholar, nor to female students due to the composition of the Choir). THE LENDRUM UNDERGRADUATE SCHOLARSHIP, to the value of £500, will be awarded annually to the student from the North-East with the highest qualifications upon entry intending to study Economics or a subject in combination with Economics. Selection will be determined by the Head of Student Financial Support and will be influenced by consideration of financial need. The University will inform Mr Chris Lendrum of the recipient of the award who will be required to contact Mr Lendrum in writing with their thanks for the award and details of what they intend to use the award for.
    [Show full text]