DOCSLIB.ORG

Year in Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Year in Review INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL LAW & POLICY HARVARD LAW SCHOOL nurturing innovative approaches to global law and policy year in review 2013-2014 Albania Algeria Argentina Australia Austria Bangladesh Belarus Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Canada Chile Colombia Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Denmark Egypt Eritrea Ethiopia Finland France Georgia Germany Ghana Greece Guinea Hong Kong Hungary India Iran Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Jordan Kazakhstan Lebanon Macedonia Malaysia Mauritius Mexico Morocco Netherlands New Zealand Niger Nigeria Norway Pakistan Palestine Panama P.R. China Peru Philippines Poland Portugal Qatar Romania Russia Senegal Serbia Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia South Africa South Korea Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Taiwan Tanzania Thailand The Bahamas Turkey Uganda United Kingdom United States Uzbekistan Venezuela Zimbabwe annual report 2013-2014 IGLP’s Year at a Glance . 1-2 The Institute Mission . 3 Research Agenda . 3 The Network . 5 Scholarly Resources . 5-6 Institute Administration . 7-8 Faculty Contributors . 9 table of contents Councils . 9-10 Program Partners & Sponsors . 11-12 IGLP Working Formats . 13-14 IGLP Events The Workshop . 15-16 June 2014 . 17-26 Other Events . 27-32 Lectures & Presentations . 33 ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL IGLP Research Current Research Projects . 35-38 Collaborative Research Grants. 39-42 Doha - Santander Research Grants . 43-46 People at the IGLP IGLP Fellows . 47-50 Visiting Researchers . 51-52 Travel Grants . 52-54 Event Participants . 55-71 Alumni Opportunities. 73-74 yearIGLP’s at a glance 2013-2014 “I had a great time, and learnt so much (both content and methodology- and I haven't even mentioned the networks) and my academic life is truly reborn.” -2014 Workshop Participant “…thank you for creating this space for us to come together” “This is the best 64 professional, countries cultural, and represented at personal the June 2014 experience that events I’ve had.” -2014 Workshop Participant 141 universities Albania Algeria Argentina represented Australia Austria Bangladesh 263 at June 2014 Belarus Belgium Bosnia scholars at the events and Herzegovina Botswana June 2014 events Brazil Bulgaria Cameroon Canada Chile Colombia Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Denmark 1000 164 facebook likes scholars at the 628 as of July 2014 2014 Workshop in Doha invited participants since 2010 “An amazing “IGLP is not experience. This “I have been workshop has only organizing disenchanted, broadened my a great horizons – and provoked, moving forward, community, but I see issues of bewildered - also building global policy and and loved every governance from a 702 bridges across totally new lens. ” minute of it!” academic sessions many lines.” -2014 Workshop Participant -2014 Workshop Participant since 2010 -2014 Workshop Participant mission The Institute for Global Law and Policy (IGLP) at Harvard Law School is a collaborative faculty effort to nurture innovative approaches to global policy in the face of a legal and institutional architecture manifestly ill- equipped to address our most urgent global challenges. Global poverty, conflict, injustice and inequality are also legal and institutional regimes. The IGLP explores the ways in which they are reproduced and what might be done in response. Scholars associated with the Institute are working to understand and map the levers of political, economic and legal authority in the world today. The Institute focuses on young scholars and policy makers who bring new ideas and perspectives to comparative and international legal research and policy. The IGLP aims to facilitate the emergence of a creative dialogue among young experts from around the world, the institute strengthening our global capacity for innovation and cooperative research. We aim to provide a platform at Harvard for new thinking about international legal and institutional arrangements, with particular emphasis on ideas and issues of importance to the global South. research agenda The Institute is an international collaborative project to foster research and policy dialogue about the structure and potential for global governance and international law affecting pressing issues of global regulation and policy. The Institute aims to foster innovative approaches to global policy and political economy, and new thinking about international legal and institutional arrangements. At the IGLP, we are convinced that governance is not only rules, institutions and procedures. Ideas also matter. If for a generation everyone thinks an “economy” is an input output mechanism to be managed, and then suddenly everyone thinks an economy is a market for allocating resources to their most efficient use in the shadow of a price system, a great deal has changed. That is also governance. At the IGLP, we encourage ANNUAL REPORT REPORT ANNUAL research into the genealogy of governance ideas as they have played out in the fields of international law, international economic law, regulatory policy, human rights and development policy. All of our academic programming is designed to support our research agenda, starting with our signature IGLP Doha Workshop for young scholars, and continuing through opportunities for Workshop alumni and IGLP scholars to build collaborative teams, deepen their thinking and develop research for publication through multiyear participation in our various conferences and other program formats. We also aim to provide a framework at Harvard for students and faculty interested in pursuing innovative and heterodox research on foundational questions of theory and history as well as pressing issues of global policy. We seek to engage the policy community and to sponsor important transnational dialogue. In recent years, we have convened policy-makers and scholars in Colombia, Chile, Brazil, Thailand, Russia and China, as well as in the United States to engage with our ongoing research activities. We regularly convene international research teams for on‐site investigations of policy directions and experience, through site visits and discussions with policy makers, often followed by an academic conference reflecting a first cut on the findings of the research inquiry. 3 new thinking challenging expertise 4 the network The IGLP encourages academic collaboration and progressive research to nurture alternative ideas about international law, society, and political economy. We have developed a global network of scholars and policy makers who share our belief that ideas matter, and we have a commitment to cultivating a space for new voices and viewpoints to emerge around ideas about global governance, social justice and economic policy. Our common goal is to better understand how power is exercised in the world today, and how original and critical thinking can transform the ways in which policy experts, intellectual leaders and citizens understand our common global situation. the institute More than 500 young scholars from more than 50 countries are alumni of our intensive Workshop. Well over 1000 young scholars have joined our online network and participate in our research activities. The IGLP network portal on our website is designed to strengthen that network and to assist all those who share our critical impulse and concern about the ideas which govern our world to share new ideas, events, research, and experiences with others in the field. This space is designed to be a haven of collaboration and sharing, all with the purpose of advancing global governance thinking and ideas. Members of the IGLP community are encouraged to reach out to one another to share their work, syllabi and their ideas through the Network News, New Thinking/New Writing, Events of Interest, or Working Papers sections of our website. The community connects with each other by posting on IGLP’s Facebook, following us on Twitter and by signing up to receive our bimonthly e-newsletter. scholarly resources Fellowship Program ANNUAL REPORT REPORT ANNUAL The Fellowship Program offers full or partial student and post‐doctoral fellowship support to a small number of scholars pursuing research in areas related to the IGLP’s ongoing work. Applicants considered for Fellowships are those whose work is challenging, original and focused on progressive and alternative ideas about global law and policy. Often, work of this nature is not supported by mainstream institutional resources, and the IGLP strives to give opportunities for diverse ideas to flourish. IGLP Fellows are integral members of the Institute and provide valuable programming insight and assistance with the execution of our conferences and workshops. The number of Fellowships awarded each year depends upon the available funding. Visiting Researchers Program The IGLP accommodates a small number of Visiting Researchers and Visiting Scholars each academic year, funded by outside sources. Visiting Researchers and Scholars apply to do research at Harvard Law School for periods of three months to one year. In making selections, the Institute considers the applicant’s background, field of interest, scholarly achievements, availability of Harvard Law School faculty for consultation in the proposed research area, and English language proficiency. Applicants should have completed their basic legal studies with high academic standing. 5 Applicants at a relatively senior stage of their professional career may be designated Visiting Scholars. This designation is made on the basis of the nature of the applicant’s proposal, the expected duration of their research, and prior academic experience.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visiting Scholars: Further Information Updated October 2017
    1 Visiting Scholars: Further information Updated October 2017 Introduction Durham Law School welcomes applications to its Visiting Scholars Programme. The School is widely- acknowledged to be one of the leading Law Schools in the UK and is a recognised centre of international excellence in legal scholarship and research. It has particular research strengths in the following areas: human rights; commercial law; criminal law and justice; European Union law; gender and legal theory; medical law and bioethics as supported by the numerous research centres and groups. Visiting Scholars will be based at Durham for a period from a week to a year. We give preference to applications for visits of up to three months, though we will consider applications for longer stays in order to allow Scholars to engage in research with academics working in related fields. Scholars are expected to pursue a specific research project while within the School and both to deliver and participate in research seminars. The School does not provide financial support for travel, accommodation or subsistence. Scholars are responsible for ensuring that they have the correct travel documentation, including visas. Admissions Because of the large number of applications we receive each year, Durham Law School is unable to accommodate all those who express interest in visiting for research purposes. Prospective visiting scholars must identify a possible sponsor in his / her area of research and contact them prior to submitting an application to be a visiting scholar at the Law School. Once that sponsor has been identified, applications should ask the sponsor for a brief statement of support.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Relational Law of Contracts: Striking a Balance Between Abstraction and Contextualism
    Legal Studies (2021), 41, 177–193 doi:10.1017/lst.2020.23 RESEARCH ARTICLE Developing a relational law of contracts: striking a balance between abstraction and contextualism Zoe Gounari*† Durham Law School, Durham University, Durham, UK *Author email: [email protected] (Accepted 20 May 2020) Abstract Relational contract theory holds that the interpretation of a contract must take full account of the context and surrounding circumstances of the parties’ bargain so as to give effect to their respective intentions. This paper argues that if a relational treatment of contracts is to be institutionalised, in the sense of being utilised in a contract dispute to determine and give effect to the parties’ intentions, then it must operate at an abstract level. That is to say, rather than using relevant context to determine what the actual parties intended in the circumstances at hand, the contextualist enquiry should ascertain the relevant con- text by reference to what the parties would have agreed to in the circumstances, had they properly reflected on what their self-interest requires. I discuss the merits of this proposition by reference to a number of appellate judgments, which already endorse contextualism as a response to contractual ambiguity, and I ultimately apply it to the Supreme Court’s judgment in Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank. Keywords: relational contracts; contract theory; contract interpretation Introduction The ‘relational contract’ recently became the basis for controversy in English contract law, when Lord Leggatt, sitting at first instance, relied on this concept to justify implying a duty of good faith into an oral contract between two highly sophisticated parties.1 The contract concerned a joint venture formed between an investor and an hotelier for the purpose of buying and developing a number of luxury hotels in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • The Student's Guide to the Leading Law Firms and Sets in the UK
    2021 The student’s guide to the leading law firms and sets in the UK e-Edition chambers-student.com Connect with us on cbaK Travers Smith’s mix of formal and informal training is second to none. It enables those coming fresh from law school to quickly become familiar with complex concepts and provides them with the necessary tools to throw themselves into their team’s work right from the start. www.traverssmith.com 10 Snow Hill, London EC1A 2AL +44 (0) 20 7295 3000 Contents Law school The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) p.37 An introduction to the SQE with ULaw p.41 Solicitors’ timetable p.43 Barristers’ timetable p.44 The Graduate Diploma in Law (GDL) p.45 The Legal Practice Course (LPC) p.49 The Bar Course p.52 How to fund law school p.55 Law school course providers p.57 Contents https://www.chambersstudent.co.uk The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) From 2021 there’s going to be an entirely new way of qualifying as a solicitor replacing the GDL, LPC and training contract. If you’re thinking ‘SQE OMG!’ – don’t fear: here’s a quick guide. What’s going on? volve a practical testing ‘pilot’ with students. The regula- In winter 2016/17 the Solicitors Regulation Authority tor has stated that it expects various other providers (i.e. (SRA) dropped a bombshell on the legal profession: it was probably law schools and the current GDL/LPC providers) going ahead with its plan for the Solicitors Qualifying Ex- to offer preparatory courses for both stages of the SQE.
    [Show full text]
  • Mother of the Nation: Femininity, Modernity, and Class in the Image of Empress Teimei
    Mother of the Nation: Femininity, Modernity, and Class in the Image of Empress Teimei By ©2016 Alison Miller Submitted to the graduate degree program in the History of Art and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson Dr. Maki Kaneko ________________________________ Dr. Sherry Fowler ________________________________ Dr. David Cateforis ________________________________ Dr. John Pultz ________________________________ Dr. Akiko Takeyama Date Defended: April 15, 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Alison Miller certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Mother of the Nation: Femininity, Modernity, and Class in the Image of Empress Teimei ________________________________ Chairperson Dr. Maki Kaneko Date approved: April 15, 2016 ii Abstract This dissertation examines the political significance of the image of the Japanese Empress Teimei (1884-1951) with a focus on issues of gender and class. During the first three decades of the twentieth century, Japanese society underwent significant changes in a short amount of time. After the intense modernizations of the late nineteenth century, the start of the twentieth century witnessed an increase in overseas militarism, turbulent domestic politics, an evolving middle class, and the expansion of roles for women to play outside the home. As such, the early decades of the twentieth century in Japan were a crucial period for the formation of modern ideas about femininity and womanhood. Before, during, and after the rule of her husband Emperor Taishō (1879-1926; r. 1912-1926), Empress Teimei held a highly public role, and was frequently seen in a variety of visual media.
    [Show full text]
  • 53 Annual Academy of American and International Law FACULTY
    53rd Annual Academy of American and International Law May 15 – June 24, 2016 The Center for American and International Law Plano, Texas FACULTY JACK J. COE, JR., is a Professor at Pepperdine University School of Law. A specialist in private international law, Professor Coe's training includes advanced studies in Europe. He received his LL.M. at Exeter, where he was a Rotary International Graduate Fellow, the Diploma of the Hague Academy of International Law, and a Ph.D. from the London School of Economics. He clerked for the Honorable Richard C. Allison at the Iran- U.S. Claims Tribunal, the Hague and now consults with governments and multinational corporations in relation to commercial and direct investment disputes under the NAFTA and Bilateral Investment Treaties. He has taught in international programs for Notre Dame and the University of San Diego Law Schools. He has authored numerous articles on arbitration, private international law, and related topics and authored the books Protecting Against the Expropriation Risk in Investing Abroad (co-authored with R.C. Allison) (1993),International Commercial Arbitration-American Principles and Practice in a Global Context (1997), and NAFTA Chapter 11 Reports (ed., with Brower and Dodge) (2006). He also is on the editorial panel for Oxford University Press' investor-state arbitration project. Professor Coe is an elected member of the American Law Institute, and an associate reporter for the Restatement (Third) on the Law of International Commercial Arbitration. He has been chair of the Academic Council of the Institute for Transnational Arbitration and chair of the Disputes Division of the ABA International Law Section.
    [Show full text]
  • Weatherhead Center for International Affairs
    WEATHERHEAD CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS H A R V A R D U N I V E R S I T Y two2004-2005 thousand four – two thousand five ANNUAL REPORTS two2005-2006 thousand five – two thousand six 1737 Cambridge Street • Cambridge, MA 02138 www.wcfia.harvard.edu TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2 PEOPLE Visiting Committee 4 Executive Committee 4 Administration 6 RESEARCH ACTIVITIES Small Grants for Faculty Research Projects 8 Medium Grants for Faculty Research Projects 9 Large Grants for Faculty Research Projects 9 Large Grants for Faculty Research Semester Leaves 9 Distinguished Lecture Series 11 Weatherhead Initiative in International Affairs 12 CONFERENCES 13 RESEARCH SEMINARS Challenges of the Twenty-First Century 34 Communist and Postcommunist Countries 35 Comparative Politics Research Workshop 36 Comparative Politics Seminar 39 Director’s Faculty Seminar 39 Economic Growth and Development 40 Harvard-MIT Joint Seminar on Political Development 41 Herbert C. Kelman Seminar on International Conflict Analysis and Resolution 42 International Business 43 International Economics 45 International History 48 Middle East 49 Political Violence and Civil War 51 Science and Society 51 South Asia 52 Transatlantic Relations 53 U.S. Foreign Policy 54 RESEARCH PROGRAMS Canada Program 56 Fellows Program 58 Harvard Academy for International and Area Studies 65 John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies 74 Justice, Welfare, and Economics 80 Nonviolent Sanctions and Cultural Survival 82 Religion, Political Economy, and Society 84 Student Programs 85 Transnational Studies Initiative 95 U.S.-Japan Relations 96 PUBLICATIONS 104 ANNUAL REPORTS 2004–2005 / 2005–2006 - 1 - INTRODUCTION In August 2005, the Weatherhead Center moved In another first, the faculty research semester to the new Center for Government and leaves that the Center awarded in spring 2005 International Studies (CGIS) complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration As Disavowal-PT-Secondrevision
    Declaration as Disavowal: The Politics of Race and Empire in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights Emma Stone Mackinnon, [email protected] Published in Political Theory; first available June 20, 2018, via OnlineFirst, at: https://doi.org/10.1177/00905917187806971 When the United Nations General Assembly ratified the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in December 1948, it provided the latest entry in the genre of the rights declaration, a genre historians often described as starting with the American Declaration of Independence and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen.1 While the documents share a good deal, the UDHR also broke from its predecessors in important ways, and when describing their relationship, other historians emphasize not shared form but conceptual discontinuity. Eighteenth-century declarations announced national independence and self-determination, principles that anticolonial movements in the twentieth century, drawing on those declarations, would attempt to carry forward. The UDHR, this story goes, was something different, setting forward human rights, and the respect of those rights by national governments, as an object of international concern.2 But neither story fully captures how the genre of the rights declaration has both been defined by and given shape to contests over the concept of human rights. I worry that the discontinuity story assumes what it purports to explain: how and why human rights and self- determination came to appear as distinct and separable conceptual legacies. The premise that individual and group rights are prima facie distinct is belied by their combination in those 1 This version is being supplied to the University of Cambridge repository solely to comply with REF requirements; if you wish to circulate or cite, please use the published version instead.
    [Show full text]
  • Juris Doctor Program 1
    Juris Doctor Program 1 substantive law, develop legal skills, and learn professional values in JURIS DOCTOR PROGRAM actual practice settings. • The Criminal Prosecution Field Placement Program gives students Law Programs an opportunity to work with prosecutors in Kansas state district The First-Year Curriculum attorneys’ offices as well as the office of the U.S. Attorney. They First-year students take courses that ensure they are well grounded in the participate in nearly all phases of the criminal process, including trial subject matter that lies at the heart of the Anglo-American legal tradition work. and that provide a foundation for upper-level classes and for the practice • In the Elder Law Field Placement Program, students work under the of law. Two aspects of the first-year curriculum — the lawyering course supervision of experienced attorneys representing clients in matters and the small-section program — contribute immeasurably to the process such as income maintenance, access to health care, housing, social of learning the law at KU. security, Medicare/Medicaid, and consumer protection. • The Field Placement Program provides students an opportunity to The lawyering course focuses on the skills and values of the profession. perform legal work under the supervision of a practicing attorney Taught by faculty members with extensive practice experience who at pre-approved governmental agencies and public international meet weekly with students in both a traditional classroom setting and organizations. small groups, the course introduces students to the tools all lawyers use • Students in the Judicial Field Placement Program serve as interns for and helps bring students to an understanding of the legal system and state and federal trial judges in Kansas City, Topeka, and Lawrence.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and History a Challenge for Education
    edited by Rainer Huhle HUMAN RIGHTS AND HISTORY A CHALLENGE FOR EDUCATION edited by Rainer Huhle H UMAN The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Genocide Convention of 1948 were promulgated as an unequivocal R response to the crimes committed under National Socialism. Human rights thus served as a universal response to concrete IGHTS historical experiences of injustice, which remains valid to the present day. As such, the Universal Declaration and the Genocide Convention serve as a key link between human rights education and historical learning. AND This volume elucidates the debates surrounding the historical development of human rights after 1945. The authors exam- H ine a number of specific human rights, including the prohibition of discrimination, freedom of opinion, the right to asylum ISTORY and the prohibition of slavery and forced labor, to consider how different historical experiences and legal traditions shaped their formulation. Through the examples of Latin America and the former Soviet Union, they explore the connections · A CHALLENGE FOR EDUCATION between human rights movements and human rights education. Finally, they address current challenges in human rights education to elucidate the role of historical experience in education. ISBN-13: 978-3-9810631-9-6 © Foundation “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future” Stiftung “Erinnerung, Verantwortung und Zukunft” Lindenstraße 20–25 10969 Berlin Germany Tel +49 (0) 30 25 92 97- 0 Fax +49 (0) 30 25 92 -11 [email protected] www.stiftung-evz.de Editor: Rainer Huhle Translation and Revision: Patricia Szobar Coordination: Christa Meyer Proofreading: Julia Brooks and Steffi Arendsee Typesetting and Design: dakato…design. David Sernau Printing: FATA Morgana Verlag ISBN-13: 978-3-9810631-9-6 Berlin, February 2010 Photo Credits: Cover page, left: Stèphane Hessel at the conference “Rights, that make us Human Beings” in Nuremberg, November 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • New Issues in Refugee Research
    NEW ISSUES IN REFUGEE RESEARCH Research Paper No. 129 Refugee policy in Eurasia: The CIS Conference and EU Enlargement Process 1996-2005 Luise Druke Center for International Studies, Program on Human Rights and Justice Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] August 2006 Policy Development and Evaluation Service Policy Development and Evaluation Service United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees CP 2500, 1211 Geneva 2 Switzerland E-mail: [email protected], Web Site: www.unhcr.org ABSTRACT This research found that significant progress has been made overall in developing a refugee policy in Eurasia (which was defined in this study as the countries comprising the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS): Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine/Kazakhstan, Kyrgystan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan; and the Central European countries of Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Romania, Poland, Slovak Republic and Slovenia). In Central Europe, the EU integration process was found to be the main engine for the refugee policy development (a condition for EU membership), though the situation with regard to its implementation was less impressive. However, as these countries are all EU Member States, (following Bulgaria and Romania’s entry in January 2007), they are evolving into the common European asylum space, which is meant, among others, to uphold at least minimum standards of refugee protection. The research also highlighted how institutions and implementation matter. For example, the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg could play an increasing role in upholding basic protection standards upon referrals to it from national courts in EU Member States under Article 234 of the Treaty of Rome 1957, as amended by the Amsterdam and subsequent texts, in order to provide judicial protection and to clarify the scope and meaning of European law in numerous areas, including asylum.
    [Show full text]
  • Solicitor Apprenticeships Employer Fact Sheet
    Academic excellence for business and the professions Solicitor Apprenticeships Employer Fact Sheet Overview of the Scheme The City Law School and CILEx Law School Trailblazer Solicitor Apprenticeships Trailblazer Solicitor Apprenticeships are The apprenticeship offers on and off the job are an exciting development for an exciting development for the legal learning consisting of work-based training the legal profession – both for profession – both for employers and the next and part-time studying. generation of solicitors. employers and the next generation In order to demonstrate their ability, of solicitors. In September 2015 the Department for apprentices will be rigorously assessed to Business, Innovation and Skills announced ensure they meet stringent requirements. The City Law School has been at the Legal Trailblazer Scheme which The City Law School has entered into a enables apprentices to qualify as a solicitor, unique partnership with CILEx Law School the forefront of the launch of this paralegal or chartered legal executive. to deliver a blended online and face-to-face new scheme since its introduction learning experience. in 2016. The City Law School successfully launched the programme in September 2016. The The City Law School is part of City, solicitor route allows students to sign University of London. City has a long up straight from school to a six year tradition of excellence in legal education programme, the completion of which will and in 2015 the National Student Survey lead to qualification as a solicitor. This is found that City was the top university in ‘Choosing an apprenticeship over the an alternative to the traditional routes of London for student satisfaction.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unreconstructed Ode to Eve Sedgwick (And Others) Brenda Cossman
    Queering Queer Legal Studies: An Unreconstructed Ode to Eve Sedgwick (and Others) Brenda Cossman Abstract The essay explores the extant field queer legal studies and maps the multiple meanings of “queer” deployed within it. I distinguish queer from LGBT, but resist any further disciplining of the term. I propose instead an understanding of queer legal studies as a sensibility. Neither a prescription nor a pronouncement, the article is written as an ode to Eve Sedgewick, her axioms and her reparative readings. I offer the essay as a celebration of queer legal studies to date and of its hopeful potentialities into an unknown future. I. Axiom 1: Queer legal theory exists. There is a body of queer legal studies. It is not part of a fantastical yet to be realized future. It is found in the oft-cited works of Francisco Valdes,1 Carl Stychin,2 Kendall Thomas,3 and Janet Halley.4 But, there is so much more. And it exists independently of what might be called LGBT legal studies. I begin with the assertion that queer legal theory exists because many who write queer legal theory begin with a counter-assertion—that there is little or no queer legal scholarship.5 The claim is puzzling. My discomfort with the claim is perhaps based in unrequited love, as I would locate my own work for the last two decades within the tradition of queer legal studies. Professor of Law, University of Toronto. I am indebted to Joseph Fischel for his generous and razor sharp engagement with this essay. 1 Francisco Valdes, Queers, Sissies, Dykes, and Tomboys: Deconstructing the Conflation of “Sex,” “Gender,” and “Sexual Orientation” in Euro-American Law and Society, 83 Cal.
    [Show full text]