THE IDENTIFICATION of LARVAE of SOME SPECIES of BARK BEETLES BREEDING in CONIFEROUS TREES in EASTERN CANADA a THESIS Submitted T

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE IDENTIFICATION of LARVAE of SOME SPECIES of BARK BEETLES BREEDING in CONIFEROUS TREES in EASTERN CANADA a THESIS Submitted T THE IDENTIFICATION OF LARVAE OF SOME SPECIES OF BARK BEETLES BREEDING IN CONIFEROUS TREES IN EASTERN CANADA A THESIS Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research of McGill University By J.B.Thomas In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy October, 1954 TABLE OF CON'I»JTS I. Introduction . 1 II. Review of Literature ...................................... 3 III. Materials and Methods ..................................... 6 IV. Species of Bark Beetles Examined •••••••••••.•••••••••.•••• 9 V. Description of the External Anatomy of gylurgops pinifex (Fitch) as Typical of Scolytid Structure •••••••••••••••••• 12 A. General ............................................. 12 B. Head ................................................ 13 C. Mouthparts .......................................... 17 1. Labrum and Epipharyngeal Lining ................ 17 2. Mandible ....................................... le 3. Maxilla ........................................ 19 4. I...a.bium •••.•••.•••.•••••••••••••••••.•••••.••••• 20 Hypopharynx ••••• ............................... 21 D. Thorax and Abdomen .••..•.•.•.•........•...••.••..... 21 Dorsum ......................................... 22 Pleuron ........................................ 31 3. SterntlID •••.••••••••.••••••••••••.•••••••••••••• 33 VI. Comparative Anatomy of Species Studied . 36 A. General Discussion of Setal Nomenclature . 36 B. Integument Including Setal Pattern . 46 C. Head Capsule Including Setal Pattern ................ 53 D. Labrum ••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 61 E. Epipharyngeal Lining •••••••••••••••••••••••••.••.••• 62 F. Mandible ............................................ 64 G. Maxilla 65 H. Labf.um •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 66 VII. Identification of Genera and Some Species Examined ....... 70 Genus Conophthorus ...................................... 78 II Crypturgu.s •••......•.•.•••••........•••...•....•. 81 II Dendroctonus · . 84 II Dryocoetes •..........................•........... 89 II Gnathotrichus .................................... 92 II ByItt.rgops ••••..••••••..••••....•.•••.••..•••.•..• 95 II Orthotomicu6 · . 98 II Phloeosinus ...................................... 101 II Pityogenes ....................................... 103 II Pityokteines · . 106 II Polygraphus ...................................... 109 °11 Pityophthoru5 .................................... 111 II Scolytus ......................................... 114 " TryPodendron .••.......•.........................• 117 VIII. Observed and Recorded Hosts .............................. 120 IX. Average Length of Larvae and Adults of Species Examined••• 123 x• SlJIIlIIla17 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 125 XI. Bibliography ............................................. 127 Plates I to XIV I. INTRODUCTION The use of the external anatomy of the larvae of bark beetles for the purpose of generic and specific identification has been neglected in the past. One reason for lack of interest in this particular phase of the study of bark beetles may lie in the biology of this group of insects where, in many cases, adults are present together with the larvae throughout most of the developmental period. However, there are occasions where larvae of more than one species feed in the same area of bark, and even though adults of all species represented are present, the percentage of each species cannot be estimated. This becomes important in population studies where, in order to obtain reasonably accurate results, all stages of each species must be counted. Also, there are occasions when the adults have emerged leaving only immature stages and here a key to the larvae is required. The small size of most bark beetle larvae of course necessitates the use of minute anatomical characters in separating one genus from another or species within a genus. This factor may lessen the usefulness of the keys for quantitative work since rapid examination of key characters is important. The use of minute and often obscure points of comparison should have no serious effect on the value of the key for qualitative purposes where the only need is to be able to say certain genera and species are repre­ sented in a particular community. An additional complication in the identity of bark beetle larvae occurs when weevil larvae, feeding in the same host, mingle with the bark beetle larvae. To date, there does not appear to be any positive means, other than rearing, of separating larvae of the families Scolytidae and Curculionidae. Identification of species of bark beetles has been made on the basis of imaginal characters, for which there are many out­ standing publications. There is also available in the literature, information on host specificity of many species as well as descriptions of the galleries and larval mines characteristic of certain genera. There has been to my knowledge no comprehensive study of the larvae of species of bark beetles occurring in eastern Canada for the purpose of separating them by anatomical characters. In the hope of establishing a satisfactory method of doing this and thereby adding a new working tool to those already available for identification of genera and species of Scolytidae, the results of my examination of the larvae of a number of spec~es of bark beetles are presented. While the number of species examined has not been as extensive as originally planned, it is my contention that the results of this study will begin to fill a gap in the published literature on bark beetles. The geographic boundaries of the areas, fraa which species being studied were selected, are not as restrictive as would appear at first since few species of bark beetles common to eastern fauna are found in the fauna of 'Western Canada, particularly in western Alberta and British Columbia. The restriction of this study to species breeding in coniferous trees is a natural one since I know of no one species which breeds in both coniferous and hardwood trees. When specimens or a sufficient number of species breeding in hardwood trees become available, it is hoped to make a separate study of the larval characteristics. - :3 - It is a pleasure to acknowledge the assistance of a number of collectors and institutions in providing material which I was unable to collect myself. Mr.N.R.Brown, University of New Brunswick, obtained a number of specimens of Dendroctonus simplex Lee. for me from the Science Service Laboratory, Fredericton, N.B. A further collection of this species was provided by Mr.A. T.Drooz of the Forest Insect Laboratory, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Mr.L.Lyons of the Forest Insect Laboratory, Sault Ste.Marie, Ontario, gave me specimens of Conophthorus coniperda (Sz.) and Q.. resinosae Hopk , , and the United States National Museum, Smithsonian Institution, loaned specimens of Ips calligraphus (Gem.), I. borealis Sw., Pithophthorus consimilis Lee. and f. puberulus Lec. For valuable criticism offered in the preparation of the manuscript by Dr.E.M.DuPorte, Macdonald College, and members of the Forest Insect Laboratory, Sault Ste.Marie, Ontario, I am very grateful. Photographic reproduction of the drawings were made by Mr.D.C.Anderson and Miss E.Heino. Dr.M.L.Prebble, Chief, Division of Forest Biology, Science Service, Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, kindly granted permission for the use of the departmental data included in this thesis. II. REVIn4 OF LITERATURE There are many important and useful publications classifying the species of Coleoptera on the basis of imaginal characters. Perhaps the most noteworthy of these in North America are Blatchley's (1910) Coleoptera of Indiana and Blatchley and Leng (1916) Rhynchophora or Weevils of North Eastern America. Also, classifications to families of coleopterous larvae have been published by a number of authors with - 4 - five very useful ones appearing in the English language. MacGillivray (1903) published a key to some of the more common families of coleopterous larvae, although determinations to many larvae were incorrect according to Peterson (1951). A more comprehensive and accurate key to most families of Coleoptera was published by Roberts (1930). Boving and Craighead's (1931) illustrated key to the principal larval forms of the order is an excellent article on this subject, particularly for advanced students. Keys to the families of larvae of beetles of the British fauna were published by VanEmden (1942). Finally, Peterson (1951) published the results of his study of larval Coleoptera, his revision of Robert's key resulting in a form more satisfactory than the original for North American species. While the keys are to families only, the book is profusely illustrated with diagrams of many species of each family featuring their diagnostic characteristics. Classifications of species of Scolytidae have been based almost solely on imaginal characters, a number of the most important taxonomic papers being those of Swaine (1918), Blatchley and Leng (1916), Hopkins (1909 and 19l5a and 1915b), Chamberlin (1939), Dodge (1938) and Beal and Massey (1945). To my knowledge, only one author has attempted a comprehensive classification of bark beetle larvae, Hopkins (1909), who included in his treatise on the genus Dendroctonus a division of the species of that genus based on larval characteristics. Earlier, in 1905, the same author stated that larval characters referred the species of Dendroctonus into practically the same position as had the adult characters and my even have indicated
Recommended publications
  • Field Bioassays of Synthetic Pheromones and Host Monoterpenes for Conophthorus Coniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)
    PHYSIOLXICAL AND CHEMICAL ECOLOGY Field Bioassays of Synthetic Pheromones and Host Monoterpenes for Conophthorus coniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) PETER DE GROOT,’ GART L. DEBARR,3 AND GORAN BIRGERSSON’,* Environ. Entomol. Z(2): 38-W (1998) ABSTRACT Four major monoterpenes, (i-)-cu-pinene, 1 (S)-( -)-/3-pinene, (R)-( t )-limonene, and myrcene are found in the cones of eastern white pines, Pinusstrobus L. Mixtures ofthese, as well as. u-pinene or P-pinene alone. increased catches of male white pine cone beetles, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwartz). in traps baited xvith the female sex pheromone, ( z)-trans-pityol. The mono- terpenes by themsekes as mistures or individually (a-pinene, /3-pinene) were not attractants for males or females. Traps baited with I r )-tram-pityol and wpinene caught as many, or significantly more beetles than those baited with pity01 and a four monoterpene mixture (1:l:l:l) used in seed orch‘ards in North Carolina, Ohio. and Virginia. Three beetle-produced compounds, conophthorin, tram-pinocarveol. and myrtenol did not enhance catches of males or females in ( z)-trans-pityol- baited traps. Racemic E-(k)- conophthorin. E-( -)- conophthorin, and E-( +)- conophthorin sig- nificantly reduced catches of males in traps baited with ( -c)-tran.s-pityol alone. Female C. coniperda were not attracted to any ofthe host- or beetle-produced compounds tested. The study demonstrated that traps \vith baits releasing (z)-t,ans-pityol at about lmgiwk with ( z)-a-pinene (98%pure) are potentially valuable tools for C conipwda pest management. Baited traps can be used to monitor C. cmipwdn populations or possibl>. to reduce seed losses in a beetle trap-out control strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Iowa's Forest Health Highlights
    December 2014 Iowa’s Forest Health Highlights IDNR, Forestry Bureau 515-725-8453 Introduction: Special Interest Each year the Iowa DNR Bureau of Forestry cooperates with numerous agencies to Articles: protect Iowa’s forests from insects, diseases, and other damaging agents. These pro- grams involve ground and aerial surveys, setting up pheromone traps, following tran- Drought Update. sects for sampling, collecting samples for laboratory analysis, and directing treatments USFS Major For- for specific problems during the growing season. After each growing season, the For- est Pests List. estry Bureau issues a summary report regarding the health of Iowa’s forests New EAB finds. Gypsy moth cap- This year’s report begins with a brief summary of weather events, Iowa’s land charac- tures. Thousand Can- teristics, and several survey summaries for insects, diseases, and invasive plants that kers Disease have the potential to impact the health of Iowa’s forests. The 2014 Forest Health High- Survey. lights will focus first on the Forest Service’s Major Forest Pest List (Page 4) and then cover the additional damaging agents that IDNR surveyed. Weather Review: This winter brought about several challenges for Iowa with colder than average tem- Individual Reports: peratures and slightly lower precipitation. The colder temperature (5-10° colder than ALB 5 average) was occasionally broken by several days in January that went above freezing, Butternut Canker 7 EAB 9 which caused many conifers to break winter dormancy. The repeated breaks in winter Gypsy Moth 14 dormancy allowed for winter desiccation and eventual tree death in many conifer spe- H.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Tuta Absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) to Different Pheromone
    1 Response of Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) to different pheromone 2 emission levels in greenhouse tomato crops 3 4 Sandra Vacas, Jesús López, Jaime Primo and Vicente Navarro-Llopis 5 6 Centro de Ecología Química Agrícola – Instituto Agroforestal del Mediterráneo (CEQA-IAM), 7 Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Camino de Vera s/n, edificio 6C, 5ª planta. 46022 Valencia (Spain). 8 9 10 11 1 12 ABSTRACT 13 The response of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) to different emission rates of its 14 pheromone, (3E,8Z,11Z)-tetradecatrienyl acetate, was evaluated in two greenhouse trials with 15 traps baited with mesoporous dispensers. For this purpose, weekly moth trap catches were 16 correlated with increasing pheromone emission levels by multiple regression analysis. 17 Pheromone release profiles of the dispensers were obtained by residual pheromone extraction and 18 gas chromatography quantification. In the first trial carried out in summer 2010, effect of 19 pheromone emission was significant as catches increased linearly with pheromone release rates 20 up to the highest studied level of 46.8 μg/d. A new trial was carried out in spring 2011 to evaluate 21 the effect of the emission factor when pheromone release rates were higher. Results demonstrated 22 that trap catches and pheromone emission fitted to a quadratic model, with maximum catches 23 obtained with a release level of 150.3 μg/d of (3E,8Z,11Z)-tetradecatrienyl acetate. This emission 24 value should provide enhanced attraction of T. absoluta and improve mass trapping, attract-and- 25 kill or monitoring techniques under greenhouse conditions in the Mediterranean area.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoretic on Bark Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae): Global Generalists, Local Specialists?
    ARTHROPOD BIOLOGY Diversity and Host Use of Mites (Acari: Mesostigmata, Oribatida) Phoretic on Bark Beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae): Global Generalists, Local Specialists? 1,2,3 1 2 WAYNE KNEE, MARK R. FORBES, AND FRE´ DE´ RIC BEAULIEU Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 106(3): 339Ð350 (2013); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/AN12092 ABSTRACT Mites (Arachnida: Acari) are one of the most diverse groups of organisms associated with bark beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae), but their taxonomy and ecology are poorly understood, including in Canada. Here we address this by describing the diversity, species composition, and host associations of mesostigmatic and oribatid mites collected from scolytines across four sites in eastern Ontario, Canada, in 2008 and 2009. Using Lindgren funnel traps baited with ␣-pinene, ethanol lures, or Ips pini (Say) pheromone lures, a total of 5,635 bark beetles (30 species) were collected, and 16.4% of these beetles had at least one mite. From these beetles, a total of 2,424 mites representing 33 species from seven families were collected. The majority of mite species had a narrow host range from one (33.3%) or two (36.4%) host species, and fewer species had a host range of three or more hosts (30.3%). This study represents the Þrst broad investigation of the acarofauna of scolytines in Canada, and we expand upon the known (worldwide) host records of described mite species by 19%, and uncover 12 new species. Half (7) of the 14 most common mites collected in this study showed a marked preference for a single host species, which contradicts the hypothesis that nonparasitic mites are typically not host speciÞc, at least locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Six-Toothed Spruce Bark Beetle Screening Aid Pityogenes Chalcographus (Linnaeus)
    Six-toothed Spruce Bark Beetle Screening Aid Pityogenes chalcographus (Linnaeus) Joseph Benzel 1) Identification Technology Program (ITP) / Colorado State University, USDA-APHIS-PPQ-Science & Technology (S&T), 2301 Research Boulevard, Suite 108, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 U.S.A. (Email: [email protected]) This CAPS (Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey) screening aid produced for and distributed by: Version 6 USDA-APHIS-PPQ National Identification Services (NIS) 30 June 2015 This and other identification resources are available at: http://caps.ceris.purdue.edu/taxonomic_services The six-toothed spruce bark beetle, Pityogenes chalcographus (Linnaeus) (Fig. 1) is a widely distributed pest in Europe. The host for this species is spruce (Picea), but it is known to be able to infest a number of other conifers including Pinus (pine), Larix (larch), Abies (fir), Juniperus (juniper), and Pseudotsuga (Douglas fir). Larvae feed in the cambium of tree branches and in the trunk, damaging the tree by girdling it and spreading blue stain fungus (Figs. 2-3). Pityogenes chalcographus is a member of the Curculionidae (subfamily Scolytinae) which is comprised of weevils and bark beetles. Members of this Fig 1: trapped Pityogenes family are highly variable but almost all species share a distinct antennal club chalcographus in the field (photo consisting of three segments. The subfamily Scolytinae, to which Pityogenes by Milan Zubrik, Forest Research belongs, consists of the bark beetles. In general, members of Scolytinae are Institute - Slovakia, Bugwood.org). small (<10mm long) pill shaped beetles of a reddish brown or black color. Some authors consider Scolytinae to be a distinct family (Scolytidae). The tribe Ipini is a large and closely allied group of genera within Scolytinae.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Forest Health Highlights
    2013 Forest Health Highlights Photo credits: Photos are from DNR forest health staff unless indicated otherwise. Projects were funded in whole or in part through a grant awarded by the USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry. Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability, or activity on behalf of a local human-rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049 or to the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240 2 Contents Minnesota County Map ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Division of Forestry Forest Health Staff ........................................................................................................................ 5 Aerial survey results ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Aerial Survey Plan Map by Quad .................................................................................................................................. 7 Pest Conditions Report ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aggregation Pheromone of the Almond Bark Beetle Scolytus Amygdali (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) S
    Use of pheromones and other semiochemicals in integrated production IOBC wprs Bulletin Vol. 25(•) 2002 pp. •-• Aggregation pheromone of the almond bark beetle Scolytus amygdali (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) S. Ben-Yehuda, T. Tolasch,1 W. Francke,2 R. Gries,2 G. Gries,2 D. Dunkelblum and Z. Mendel Department of Entomology, ARO, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, 50250, Israel 1 Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Hamburg, D-20146, Germany 2 Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada Abstract: The almond bark beetle (ABB), Scolytus amygdali (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), is a pest of stone fruits in the Mediterranean region and southern Europe. Adults feeding on buds cause most of the damage. Applications of non-selective insecticides, burning of dead trees and pruning slash are environmentally unsafe and are often ineffective for ABB control. Preliminary experiments with ABB colonizing branches indicated the existence of an aggregation pheromone, and prompted us to identify it. Volatiles emitted by female ABB boring into plum branches were collected on Porapak Q and eluted with hexane. GC-EAD analyses of volatile extracts, using female antennae as an electroan- tennographic detector, revealed four EAD-active candidate pheromone components, as follows: (3S,4S)-4-methyl-3-heptanol (SS-I), most abundant and EAD-active component; (3S,4S)-4-methyl-3- hexanol (SS-II); (5S,7S)-7-methyl-1,6-dioxaspiro[4,5]decane (III); and 7-methyl-1,6-dioxaspiro [4,5]dec-8-ene [IV], the first unsaturated spiroaketal found in insects. In field experiments (1994- 1998) using funnel traps baited with polyethylene pheromone dispensers, SS-I unlike SS-II was at- tractive by itself, while SS-I plus SS-II at a ratio of 2:1 was optimally attractive.
    [Show full text]
  • Uso De Semioquímicos En El Control De Plagas. Estudios Básicos Y De Aplicación”
    UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE VALENCIA Departamento de Química CENTRO DE ECOLOGÍA QUÍMICA AGRÍCOLA (CEQA) INSTITUTO AGROFORESTAL DEL MEDITERRÁNEO (IAM) TESIS DOCTORAL: “Uso de semioquímicos en el control de plagas. Estudios básicos y de aplicación” Presentada por: Sandra Vacas González Directores: Vicente Navarro Llopis Jaime Primo Millo Valencia, Septiembre de 2011 Agradecimientos Son muchas las personas que han participado en esta tesis doctoral, y en mi vida, durante su realización, pero quisiera agradecer especialmente, a mis directores de tesis, el Profesor Jaime Primo y el Dr. Vicente Navarro, por todo su apoyo y por darme la oportunidad de aprender y trabajar a su lado. A todos mis compañeros de laboratorio, pasados y presentes, María, mi prima Nunu, Ilde, Juan, Pilar, Bea, Mapi, Javi, Ismael, Mónica, Ricardo, Nacho, Pau, Josep, Aurora, Ana, Inma, Jesús, Anna… no podría haber mejor grupo con quien compartir cada momento. Y especialmente a Cristina Alfaro, gracias por todo (¡qué gran equipo formamos!). A todas las personas que han facilitado la realización y han colaborado en los ensayos de campo, técnicos, propietarios, cooperativas, empresarios… porque sin ellos difícilmente podría todo esto llevarse a cabo, y especialmente a todo el equipo de Ecologia y Protección Agrícola y a los servicios de Sanidad Vegetal. También quiero expresar mi agradecimiento al Dr. Eric B. Jang, y todo su equipo en el laboratorio del USDA en Hilo, por su hospitalidad y darme la oportunidad de conocer su trabajo y hacerme sentir parte de su grupo. Gracias a mi familia y a mis amigos, que me han apoyado y me han hecho la persona que soy.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Forestry P. O. Box 3758 Charlottesvllle, VA 22903
    OCTOBER 1989 THE PEST REPORT Department of Forestry P. o. Box 3758 Charlottesvllle, VA 22903 { .. .. PEST REPORT DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY P. 0. BOX 3758 (804) 977-6555 PURPOSE: To inform Department of Forestry personnel, interested agencies, organizations, and individuals. PEST MANAGEMENT STAFF Chief, Pest Management ........ .... Joel D. Artman Asst. Chief, Pest Management ..... Timothy C. Tigner Forestry Technician .. ... .. .. ... John I. Severt Forestry Technician ....... • . •.••.• . Larry T. Moody Office Services Specialist . ••.• . •••• . Sharon H. Hall NOTE: Over the past year, your Pest Management Branch has received a disappointing number of questions to which answers existed in previous issues of the Pest Report. Please file these reports for future reference. Sharon Hall has done an excellent job of making subjects easy to find. TABLE OF CONTENTS UPDATE Miscellaneous Defoliators . 1 Dog-day Cicadas . 1 Nantucket Pine Tip Moth ................................. 1 Saddleback Caterpillar . 1 Ozone Damage ....................................... 1 Gypsy Moth .......................................... 1 Southern Pine Beetle . • . • • . 2 lmidan Substitutes ..................................... 2 Hickory Mortality ....................................... 2 Defoliation of White and Red Oaks . 2 Hugo ............................................... 2 Dogwood Anthracnose .................................. 3 Endangered Species Progarm ............................. 4 DuPont Garbage Bags ............................ ..... 5 Diagnosis Request
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting Capture of the White Pine Cone Beetle, Conopltthorus Con&E
    JAE 122 (1998) ‘ * J. Appl. Ent. 122,281-286 (1998) NJ 1998, Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin ISSN 093 l-2048 Factors affecting capture of the white pine cone beetle, Conopltthorus con&e& (Schwa@ (Col., Scolytidae) in pheromone traps P. de Groat’ and G. L. DeBarr’ ‘Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Box 490, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada; ‘USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Athens, GA, USA Abstract: The white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda, is a serious pest of seed orchards. The sex pheromone (+)-trans-pityol, (2R,SS)-2-(l-hydroxy- 1 -methylethyl)-S-methyltetrahydrofuran, shows considerable promise to manage the cone beetle populations in seed orchards. Our work confirms that pity01 is an,effective attractant to capture male C. coniperdu. Traps need to be placed in the tree crown, preferably in the cone-bearing region, to trap out more insects. Japanese beetle traps were superior to the Lindgren funnel traps in capturing insects and trap colour had no significant effect. Commercially available bubble caps for dispensing pheromone were as effective as the experimental ‘vial and wick’ and the glass capillary tube units. Pity01 released at about 0.1 mg . day-’ (100 female equivalents) was effective, and higher (more expensive) rates did not significantly improve trap catch. 1 Introduction 2 Materials and methods The white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda 2.1 Study sites (Schwarz), is found throughout the range of eastern Field-trapping experiments were conducted from 199 1 to 1995 white pine, Pinus strobus L. (WOOD, 1982) and is a in five locations in North America: two white pine seed serious pest in seed orchards (DEBARR et al., 1982; DE orchards near Murphy (United States Forest Service, Beech GROOT, 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Larval Instars of the Walnut Twig Beetle, Pityophthorus Juglandis Blackman (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in North
    An analysis of the larval instars of the walnut twig beetle, Pityophthorus juglandis Blackman (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in northern California black walnut, Juglans hindsii, and a new host record for Hylocurus hirtellus Author(s): Paul L. Dallara, Mary L. Flint, and Steven J. Seybold Source: Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 88(2):248-266. 2012. Published By: Pacific Coast Entomological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3956/2012-16.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3956/2012-16.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/ terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. THE PAN-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGIST 88(2):248–266, (2012) An analysis of the larval instars of the walnut twig beetle, Pityophthorus juglandis Blackman (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), in northern California black walnut, Juglans hindsii, and a new host record for Hylocurus hirtellus 1 1 2 PAUL L. DALLARA ,MARY L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bark Beetles of Minnesota (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)
    Technical Bulletin 132 December 1938 The Bark Beetles of Minnesota (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Harold Rodney Dodge Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station (Accepted for publication April 1938) - , The Bark Beetles of Minnesota (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Harold Rodney Dodge Division of Entomology and Economic Zoology University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station (Accepted for publication April 1938) CONTENTS Page Economic importance 3 Control measures 5 Natural control 6 Life history and habits 6 Galleries 10 Classification of the brood galleries or brood burrows 11 Field key to the Minnesota bark beetles 13 Morphological characters 16 Key to the genera known or likely to occur in Minnesota 16 Notes on the species 20 Scolytinae 20 Hylesinae 23 Micracinae 33 Ipinae 34 Bibliography 56 Index to species 59 The Bark Beetles of Minnesota (Co/eoptera: Scolytidae) HAROLD RODNEY DODGE Since the beginning of this century our knowledge of the Scolytidae has increased greatly. In Swaine's catalog (1909) 191 species are recog- nized from America north of Mexico. In Leng's catalog (1920) 383 species are listed, and at present there are about 550 described species from the same territory. This great increase in our knowledge of the family is due nearly entirely to the writings of A. D. Hopkins, J. M. Swaine, and M. W. Blackman. To date, 64 species have been taken in Minnesota, and a number of others doubtless occur. The material upon which this bulletin is based is from the University of Minnesota insect collection, and specimens collected by the writer during the summer of 1936.
    [Show full text]