DOCSLIB.ORG

Coleoptera: Cleridae) of Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coleoptera: Cleridae) of Florida THE CHECKERED BEETLES (COLEOPTERA: CLERIDAE) OF FLORIDA By JOHN MOELLER LEAVENGOOD, JR. A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 John Moeller Leavengood, Jr. 2 In loving memory of Kevin Thomsen, a dear friend 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For their shared interest in taxonomy and their inspiration I would like to thank James C. Dunford, Marc A. Branham, James C. Wiley, John L. Foltz, and Paul M. Choate. I would like to thank my supervisory committee (Michael C. Thomas, Paul E. Skelley, and Amanda C. Hodges) for their support and friendly criticism. I would also like to thank my father, John M. Leavengood. He has been a financier of this project and he has served me enormously as a confidant and a friend. A lifetime seems far too short to truly repay him for all he has done for me—but I will try anyway. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF FIGURES .........................................................................................................................8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................................12 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................13 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................15 Literature Review ...................................................................................................................18 Materials and Methods ...........................................................................................................20 Key to the Subfamilies of Cleridae .........................................................................................22 2 CLERINAE .............................................................................................................................25 Key to the Florida Genera of Clerinae ....................................................................................25 Genus Enoclerus Gahan, 1910 ...............................................................................................25 Key to the Florida Species of Enoclerus ................................................................................26 Enoclerus angustus (LeConte), 1849 (Figs. 2-1, 2-2) .....................................................27 Enoclerus ichneumoneus (Fabricius), 1777 (Figs. 2-3, 2-4) ...........................................29 Enoclerus lunatus (Klug), 1842 (Figs. 2-5, 2-6) .............................................................35 Enoclerus nigrifrons (Say), 1823 (Figs. 2-7, 2-8) ...........................................................39 Enoclerus nigripes (Say), 1823 (Figs. 2-9, 2-10) ............................................................40 Enoclerus rosmarus (Say), 1823 (Figs. 2-11, 2-12) ........................................................42 Genus Placopterus Wolcott, 1910 ..........................................................................................44 Placopterus subcostatus (Schaeffer), 1917 .....................................................................44 Placopterus thoracicus (Olivier), 1795 (Figs. 2-13, 2-14) ..............................................45 Genus Priocera Kirby, 1818 ...................................................................................................47 Priocera castanea (Newman), 1838 (Figs. 2-15, 2-16) ..................................................48 Genus Thanasimus Latrielle, 1806 .........................................................................................50 Thanasimus dubius (Fabricius), 1777 (Figs. 2-17, 2-18) ................................................51 Genus Trichodes Herbst, 1792 ...............................................................................................54 Trichodes apivorus Germar, 1824 (Figs. 2-19, 2-20) ......................................................55 5 3 ENOPLIINAE .........................................................................................................................70 Key to the Florida Genera of Enopliinae ................................................................................70 Genus Chariessa Perty, 1830 .................................................................................................70 Key to the Florida Species of Chariessa .........................................................................71 Chariessa floridana Schaeffer, 1917 (Figs. 3-1, 3-2) .....................................................71 Chariessa pilosa Forster, 1771 (Figs. 3-3, 3-4) ...............................................................71 Genus Cregya LeConte, 1861 .................................................................................................76 Key to the Florida Species of Cregya ..............................................................................76 Cregya oculata (Say), 1835 (Figs. 3-5, 3-6) ...................................................................76 Cregya quadrinotata Spinola, 1844 (Figs. 3-7, 3-8) .......................................................79 Genus Neorthopleura Barr, 1976 ...........................................................................................80 Neorthopleura thoracica (Say), 1823 (Figs. 3-9, 3-10) ..................................................80 Genus Pelonium Spinola, 1844 ...............................................................................................87 Pelonium leucophaeum (Klug), 1842 (Figs. 3-11, 3-12) .................................................87 4 EPIPHLOEINAE ....................................................................................................................98 Key to the Florida Genera and Species of Epiphloeinae ........................................................98 Genus Madoniella Pic, 1935 ...................................................................................................98 Madoniella dislocatus (Say), 1825 (Figs. 4-1, 4-2) .........................................................98 Genus Pyticeroides Kuwert, 1894 ........................................................................................100 Pyticeroides laticornis (Say), 1835 (Figs. 4-3, 4-4) ......................................................101 5 HYDNOCERINAE ...............................................................................................................106 Key to the Florida Genera of Hydnocerinae .........................................................................106 Genus Isohydnocera Chapin, 1917 .......................................................................................106 Isohydnocera curtipennis (Newman), 1840 (Figs. 5-1, 5-2) .........................................106 Genus Phyllobaenus Dejean, 1833 .......................................................................................108 Key to the Florida Species of Phyllobaenus .........................................................................110 Phyllobaenus humeralis (Say), 1823 (Figs. 5-3, 5-4) ...................................................111 Phyllobaenus pallipennis (Say), 1825 (Figs. 5-5, 5-6) ..................................................112 Phyllobaenus pubescens (LeConte), 1849 (Figs. 5-7, 5-8) ...........................................114 Phyllobaenus rufipes (Newman), 1840 (Figs. 5-9, 5-10) ..............................................116 Phyllobaenus suturalis (Klug), 1842 (Figs. 5-11, 5-12) ...............................................117 Phyllobaenus unifasciatus (Say), 1825 (Figs. 5-13, 5-14) ............................................118 Phyllobaenus verticalis Say, 1835 (Figs. 5-15, 5-16) ...................................................120 6 KORYNETINAE ..................................................................................................................132 Genus Necrobia Olivier, 1795 ..............................................................................................132 Key to the Florida Species of Necrobia ........................................................................132 Necrobia ruficollis Fabricius, 1775 (Figs. 6-1, 6-2) ......................................................133 Necrobia rufipes Degeer, 1775 (Figs. 6-3, 6-4) ............................................................133 Necrobia violacea (Linnaeus), 1758 (Figs. 6-5, 6-6) ....................................................137 6 7 TARSOSTENINAE ..............................................................................................................142 Genus Tarsostenus Spinola, 1844 .........................................................................................142 Tarsostenus univittatus (Rossi), 1792 (Figs. 7-1, 7-2) ..................................................142 8 THANEROCLERINAE .......................................................................................................146 Key to the Florida Genera and Species of Thaneroclerinae .................................................146 Genus Ababa Casey, 1897 ....................................................................................................146 Ababa tantilla (LeConte), 1865 (Figs. 8-1, 8-2) ...........................................................147
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Celtis Tenuifolia) in Ontario
    Photo: Allen Woodliffe Dwarf Hackberry (Celtis tenuifolia) in Ontario Ontario Recovery Strategy Series Recovery strategy prepared under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 2013 Ministry of Natural Resources About the Ontario Recovery Strategy Series This series presents the collection of recovery strategies that are prepared or adopted as advice to the Province of Ontario on the recommended approach to recover species at risk. The Province ensures the preparation of recovery strategies to meet its commitments to recover species at risk under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk in Canada. What is recovery? What’s next? Recovery of species at risk is the process by which the Nine months after the completion of a recovery strategy decline of an endangered, threatened, or extirpated a government response statement will be published species is arrested or reversed, and threats are which summarizes the actions that the Government of removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of a Ontario intends to take in response to the strategy. species’ persistence in the wild. The implementation of recovery strategies depends on the continued cooperation and actions of government agencies, individuals, communities, land users, and What is a recovery strategy? conservationists. Under the ESA a recovery strategy provides the best available scientific knowledge on what is required to For more information achieve recovery of a species. A recovery strategy outlines the habitat needs and the threats to the To learn more about species at risk recovery in Ontario, survival and recovery of the species. It also makes please visit the Ministry of Natural Resources Species at recommendations on the objectives for protection and Risk webpage at: www.ontario.ca/speciesatrisk recovery, the approaches to achieve those objectives, and the area that should be considered in the development of a habitat regulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E
    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
    [Show full text]
  • Bark Beetles
    Bark Beetles O & T Guide [O-#03] Carol A. Sutherland Extension and State Entomologist Cooperative Extension Service z College of Agriculture and Home Economics z October 2006 Although New Mexico bark beetle adults are In monogamous species such as the Douglas small, rarely exceeding 1/3 inch in length, they fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae, the are very capable of killing even the largest female bores the initial gallery into the host host trees with a mass assault, girdling them or tree, releases pheromones attractive to her inoculating them with certain lethal pathogens. species and accepts one male as her mate. Some species routinely attack the trunks and major limbs of their host trees, other bark beetle species mine the twigs of their hosts, pruning and weakening trees and facilitating the attack of other tree pests. While many devastating species of bark beetles are associated with New Mexico conifers, other species favor broadleaf trees and can be equally damaging. Scientifically: Bark beetles belong to the insect order Coleoptera and the family Scolytidae. Adult “engraver beetle” in the genus Ips. The head is on the left; note the “scooped out” area Metamorphosis: Complete rimmed by short spines on the rear of the Mouth Parts: Chewing (larvae and adults) beetle, a common feature for members of this Pest Stages: Larvae and adults. genus. Photo: USDA Forest Service Archives, USDA Forest Service, www.forestryimages.org Typical Life Cycle: Adult bark beetles are strong fliers and are highly receptive to scents In polygamous species such as the pinyon bark produced by damaged or stressed host trees as beetle, Ips confusus, the male bores a short well as communication pheromones produced nuptial chamber into the host’s bark, releases by other members of their species.
    [Show full text]
  • Spruce Beetle
    QUICK GUIDE SERIES FM 2014-1 Spruce Beetle An Agent of Subalpine Change The spruce beetle is a native species in Colorado’s spruce forest ecosystem. Endemic populations are always present, and epidemics are a natural part of the changing forest. There usually are long intervals between such events as insect and disease epidemics and wildfires, giving spruce forests time to regenerate. Prior to their occurrence, the potential impacts of these natural disturbances can be reduced through proactive forest management. The spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) is responsible for the death of more spruce trees in North America than any other natural agent. Spruce beetle populations range from Alaska and Newfoundland to as far south as Arizona and New Mexico. The subalpine Engelmann spruce is the primary host tree, but the beetles will infest any Figure 1. Engelmann spruce trees infested spruce tree species within their geographical range, including blue spruce. In with spruce beetles on Spring Creek Pass. Colorado, the beetles are most commonly observed in high-elevation spruce Photo: William M. Ciesla forests above 9,000 feet. At endemic or low population levels, spruce beetles generally infest only downed trees. However, as spruce beetle population levels in downed trees increase, usually following an avalanche or windthrow event – a high-wind event that topples trees over a large area – the beetles also will infest live standing trees. Spruce beetles prefer large (16 inches in diameter or greater), mature and over- mature spruce trees in slow-growing, spruce-dominated stands. However, at epidemic levels, or when large-scale, rapid population increases occur, spruce beetles may attack trees as small as 3 inches in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States
    Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States September 1993 OTA-F-565 NTIS order #PB94-107679 GPO stock #052-003-01347-9 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Harmful Non-Indigenous Species in the United States, OTA-F-565 (Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, September 1993). For Sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office ii Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop, SSOP. Washington, DC 20402-9328 ISBN O-1 6-042075-X Foreword on-indigenous species (NIS)-----those species found beyond their natural ranges—are part and parcel of the U.S. landscape. Many are highly beneficial. Almost all U.S. crops and domesticated animals, many sport fish and aquiculture species, numerous horticultural plants, and most biologicalN control organisms have origins outside the country. A large number of NIS, however, cause significant economic, environmental, and health damage. These harmful species are the focus of this study. The total number of harmful NIS and their cumulative impacts are creating a growing burden for the country. We cannot completely stop the tide of new harmful introductions. Perfect screening, detection, and control are technically impossible and will remain so for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, the Federal and State policies designed to protect us from the worst species are not safeguarding our national interests in important areas. These conclusions have a number of policy implications. First, the Nation has no real national policy on harmful introductions; the current system is piecemeal, lacking adequate rigor and comprehensiveness. Second, many Federal and State statutes, regulations, and programs are not keeping pace with new and spreading non-indigenous pests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera Identifying the Beetles
    6/17/2020 Coleoptera Identifying the Beetles Who we are: Matt Hamblin [email protected] Graduate of Kansas State University in Manhattan, KS. Bachelors of Science in Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology Minor in Entomology Began M.S. in Entomology Fall 2018 focusing on Entomology Education Who we are: Jacqueline Maille [email protected] Graduate of Kansas State University in Manhattan, KS with M.S. in Entomology. Austin Peay State University in Clarksville, TN with a Bachelors of Science in Biology, Minor Chemistry Began Ph.D. iin Entomology with KSU and USDA-SPIERU in Spring 2020 Focusing on Stored Product Pest Sensory Systems and Management 1 6/17/2020 Who we are: Isaac Fox [email protected] 2016 Kansas 4-H Entomology Award Winner Pest Scout at Arnold’s Greenhouse Distribution, Abundance and Diversity Global distribution Beetles account for ~25% of all life forms ~390,000 species worldwide What distinguishes a beetle? 1. Hard forewings called elytra 2. Mandibles move horizontally 3. Antennae with usually 11 or less segments exceptions (Cerambycidae Rhipiceridae) 4. Holometabolous 2 6/17/2020 Anatomy Taxonomically Important Features Amount of tarsi Tarsal spurs/ spines Antennae placement and features Elytra features Eyes Body Form Antennae Forms Filiform = thread-like Moniliform = beaded Serrate = sawtoothed Setaceous = bristle-like Lamellate = nested plates Pectinate = comb-like Plumose = long hairs Clavate = gradually clubbed Capitate = abruptly clubbed Aristate = pouch-like with one lateral bristle Nicrophilus americanus Silphidae, American Burying Beetle Counties with protected critical habitats: Montgomery, Elk, Chautauqua, and Wilson Red-tipped antennae, red pronotum The ecological services section, Kansas department of Wildlife, Parks, and Tourism 3 6/17/2020 Suborders Adephaga vs Polyphaga Families ~176 described families in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoological Philosophy
    ZOOLOGICAL PHILOSOPHY AN EXPOSITION WITH REGARD TO THE NATURAL HISTORY OF ANIMALS THE DIVERSITY OF THEIR ORGANISATION AND THE FACULTIES WHICH THEY DERIVE FROM IT; THE PHYSICAL CAUSES WHICH MAINTAIN LIFE WITHIr-i THEM AND GIVE RISE TO THEIR VARIOUS MOVEMENTS; LASTLY, THOSE WHICH PRODUCE FEELING AND INTELLIGENCE IN SOME AMONG THEM ;/:vVVNu. BY y;..~~ .9 I J. B. LAMARCK MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED LONDON' BOMBAY' CALCUTTA MELBOURNE THE MACMILLAN COMPANY TRANSLATED, WITH AN INTRODUCTION, BY NEW YORK • BOSTON . CHICAGO DALLAS • SAN FRANCISCO HUGH ELLIOT THE MACMILLAN CO. OF CANADA, LTD. AUTHOR OF "MODERN SCIENC\-<: AND THE ILLUSIONS OF PROFESSOR BRRGSON" TORONTO EDITOR OF H THE LETTERS OF JOHN STUART MILL," ETC., ETC. MACMILLAN AND CO., LIMITED ST. MARTIN'S STREET, LONDON TABLE OF CONTENTS P.4.GE INTRODUCTION xvii Life-The Philo8ophie Zoologique-Zoology-Evolution-In. heritance of acquired characters-Classification-Physiology­ Psychology-Conclusion. PREFACE· 1 Object of the work, and general observations on the subjects COPYRIGHT dealt with in it. PRELIMINARY DISCOURSE 9 Some general considerations on the interest of the study of animals and their organisation, especially among the most imperfect. PART I. CONSIDERATIONS ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF ANIMALS, THEIR CHARACTERS, AFFINITIES, ORGANISATION, CLASSIFICATION AND SPECIES. CHAP. I. ON ARTIFICIAL DEVICES IN DEALING WITH THE PRO- DUCTIONS OF NATURE 19 How schematic classifications, classes, orders, families, genera and nomenclature are only artificial devices. Il. IMPORTANCE OF THE CONSIDERATION OF AFFINITIES 29 How a knowledge of the affinities between the known natural productions lies at the base of natural science, and is the funda- mental factor in a general classification of animals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology of the Male Reproductive Tract in the Water Scavenger Beetle Tropisternus Collaris Fabricius, 1775 (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae)
    Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 65(2):e20210012, 2021 Morphology of the male reproductive tract in the water scavenger beetle Tropisternus collaris Fabricius, 1775 (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) Vinícius Albano Araújo1* , Igor Luiz Araújo Munhoz2, José Eduardo Serrão3 1Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Biodiversidade e Sustentabilidade (NUPEM), Macaé, RJ, Brasil. 2Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. 3Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Biologia Geral, Viçosa, MG, Brasil. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Members of the Hydrophilidae, one of the largest families of aquatic insects, are potential models for the Received 07 February 2021 biomonitoring of freshwater habitats and global climate change. In this study, we describe the morphology of Accepted 19 April 2021 the male reproductive tract in the water scavenger beetle Tropisternus collaris. The reproductive tract in sexually Available online 12 May 2021 mature males comprised a pair of testes, each with at least 30 follicles, vasa efferentia, vasa deferentia, seminal Associate Editor: Marcela Monné vesicles, two pairs of accessory glands (a bean-shaped pair and a tubular pair with a forked end), and an ejaculatory duct. Characters such as the number of testicular follicles and accessory glands, as well as their shape, origin, and type of secretion, differ between Coleoptera taxa and have potential to help elucidate reproductive strategies and Keywords: the evolutionary history of the group. Accessory glands Hydrophilid Polyphaga Reproductive system Introduction Coleoptera is the most diverse group of insects in the current fauna, The evolutionary history of Coleoptera diversity (Lawrence et al., with about 400,000 described species and still thousands of new species 1995; Lawrence, 2016) has been grounded in phylogenies with waiting to be discovered (Slipinski et al., 2011; Kundrata et al., 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Download [PDF File]
    A CATALOG OF THE COLEÓPTERA OF AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO FAMILY: CIIDAE «-su* CL«. ,- -î Ï* r~- CÜ^' ■ i ' ■"" ^ r-oOD r"*^^ ~CJ» c:' ^ZD"^,^ CO' ./S^ UNITED STATES AGRICULTURE PREPARED BY (fyj) DEPARTMENT OF HANDBOOK AGRICULTURAL AGRICULTURE NUMBER 529-105 RESEARCH SERVICE FAMILIES OF COLEóPTERA IN AMERICA NORTH OF MEXICO Fascicle ' Family Year issued Fascicle ' Family Year issued Fascicle ' Family Year issued 1 Cupedidae 1979 45 Chelonariidae 98 Endomychidae __ 2 Micromalthidae 46 Callirhipidae 100 Lathridiidae 3 Carabidae 47 Heteroceridae 1978 102 Biphyllidae 4 Rhysodidae 48 Limnichidae 103 Byturidae 5 Amphizoidae 49 Dryopidae 104 Mycetophagidae 6 Haliplidae 50 Elmidae 105 Ciidae 1982 8 Noteridae 51 Buprestidae 107 Prostomidae 9 Dytiscidae 52 Cebrionidae 10 Gyrinidae 53 Elateridae 109 Colydiidae 13 Sphaeriidae 54 Throscidae 110 Mononunatidae 14 Hydroscaphidae 55 Cerophytidae 111 Cephaloidae 15 Hydraenidae 56 Perothopidae 112 Zopheridae 16 Hydrophilidae 57 Eucnemidae 115 Tenebrionidae _ _ 17 Georyssidae 58 —Telegeusidae 116 Alleculidae 18 Sphaeritidae 61 Phengodidae 117 -Lasriidae 20 Histeridae 62 Lampyridae 118 Salpingidae 21 Ptiliidae 63 Cantharidae 119 Mycteridae 22 Limulodidae 64 Lycidae 120 Pyrochroidae _— 23-__-Dasycendae 65 Derodontidae 121 Othniidae 24 Micropeplidae 66 Nosodendridae 122 Inopeplidae 25 -Leptinidae 67 Dermestidae 123 Oedemeridae ___ 26 Leiodidae 69 Ptinidae 124 Melandryidae __ 27 Scydmaenidae 70 Anobiidae 125 Mordellidae 28 Silphidae 71 Bostrichidae 126 Rhipiphoridae __ 29 Scaphidiidae 72 Lyctidae 127_ _- Meloidae
    [Show full text]
  • (Coleoptera) from European Eocene Ambers
    geosciences Review A Review of the Curculionoidea (Coleoptera) from European Eocene Ambers Andrei A. Legalov 1,2 1 Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Frunze Street 11, 630091 Novosibirsk, Russia; [email protected]; Tel.: +7-9139471413 2 Biological Institute, Tomsk State University, Lenina Prospekt 36, 634050 Tomsk, Russia Received: 16 October 2019; Accepted: 23 December 2019; Published: 30 December 2019 Abstract: All 142 known species of Curculionoidea in Eocene amber are documented, including one species of Nemonychidae, 16 species of Anthribidae, six species of Belidae, 10 species of Rhynchitidae, 13 species of Brentidae, 70 species of Curcuionidae, two species of Platypodidae, and 24 species of Scolytidae. Oise amber has eight species, Baltic amber has 118 species, and Rovno amber has 16 species. Nine new genera and 18 new species are described from Baltic amber. Four new synonyms are noted: Palaeometrioxena Legalov, 2012, syn. nov. is synonymous with Archimetrioxena Voss, 1953; Paleopissodes weigangae Ulke, 1947, syn. nov. is synonymous with Electrotribus theryi Hustache, 1942; Electrotribus erectosquamata Rheinheimer, 2007, syn. nov. is synonymous with Succinostyphlus mroczkowskii Kuska, 1996; Protonaupactus Zherikhin, 1971, syn. nov. is synonymous with Paonaupactus Voss, 1953. Keys for Eocene amber Curculionoidea are given. There are the first records of Aedemonini and Camarotini, and genera Limalophus and Cenocephalus in Baltic amber. Keywords: Coleoptera; Curculionoidea; fossil weevil; new taxa; keys; Palaeogene 1. Introduction The Curculionoidea are one of the largest and most diverse groups of beetles, including more than 62,000 species [1] comprising 11 families [2,3]. They have a complex morphological structure [2–7], ecological confinement, and diverse trophic links [1], which makes them a convenient group for characterizing modern and fossil biocenoses.
    [Show full text]