DOCSLIB.ORG

Towards a Typology for the Targum Sheni of Esther

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Towards a Typology for the Targum Sheni of Esther Aramaic Studies Aramaic Studies 9.1 (2011) 47–63 www.brill.nl/arst Targum a Misnomer for Midrash? Towards a Typology for the Targum Sheni of Esther Robert Hayward University of Durham The title of this paper evokes the well known description which Alexander Sperber applied to Targum Sheni of Esther in his 1968 publication The Bible in Aramaic IVA.1 Pointing out that he had made no attempt to produce a critical edition of Targum Sheni, or of any other Targum included in that volume, Sperber remarked: ‘The reason for it is obvious: these texts are not Targum- texts but Midrash-texts in the disguise of Targum’.2 Roger le Déaut points out that the categorising of Targum Sheni as more Midrash than Targum is found already in the work of Leopold Zunz; and this position has had many advocates since Zunz’s time.3 This state of affairs may, perhaps, be reflected in earlier sources: Tosafot at b. Hag. 11a speak of this Aramaic text as 1) See A. Sperber, The Bible in Aramaic,IVA.The Hagiographa Transition from Translation to Midrash (Leiden: Brill, 1968). This title, which is printed on the English side of the book’s cover, summarizes some key aspects of Sperber’s approach to the texts included in the volume, namely, Targumim of Chronicles, Ruth, Canticles, Lamentations, Ecclesiastes, and Esther. 2) See Sperber, The Bible in Aramaic IVA, p. viii. 3) See R. le Déaut, Introduction à la Littérature Targumique Première Partie (Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1988), p. 141,note5, citing Zunz, Die gottesdienstlichen Vorträge der Juden, (Frankfurt am Main, 2nd edn., 1892), p. 83: he records also Wilhelm Bacher’s similar opinion, and himself declares that Targum Sheni ‘can be considered more as a midrash than a Targum’. However, he immediately notes (p. 142) that Rashi, commenting on Deut. 3.4, had referred to it as Targum Jerushalmi: this prompts him to state that Targum Sheni is, in fact, an authentic Palestinian Targum, in support of which he again (p. 142,note1)cites Zunz, along with S. Baer, ‘Ueber den Geist des Jeruschalmi (Pseudo-Jonathan)’, MGWJ 1 (1851–1852), p. 235, and A. Díez Macho, ‘Un Segundo Fragmento del Targum Palestinese a los Profetas’, Biblica 39 (1958), p. 203. © Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2011 DOI: 10.1163/147783511X594843 48 Robert Hayward / Aramaic Studies 9.1 (2011) 47–63 ‘Targum Megilllat Esther’, and Rashi, commenting on Deut. 3.4, designates it ‘Targum Jerushalmi’; whereas Tosafot at b. Meg. 12b refer to it as ‘Midrash’. A typological profile of the text’s surface of the kind which the Manchester- Durham Typology Research Project is now able to supply, might, perhaps, lead to some clarification of the issues involved, and some new insights into an old problem. Bernard Grossfeld’s critical edition of the oldest known manuscript of Targum Sheni, MS Sassoon 282, forms the basis of the following analysis.4 Completed in 1189, the text presented in this MS signals its boundaries with reference to the Masoretic Text of Megillat Esther. Thus it ends with the closing words of MT Est. 10.3, ‘and speaking peace to all his descendants’, closely translated into Aramaic; and it opens with an extended exposition of the opening words of the Megillah, ‘and it came to pass in the days of Ahashverosh’. All MSS witnesses to the text, except only British Library MS Or. 2375 and Paris Heb. 110, set the Hebrew text of Esther along with the Aramaic.5 The Hebrew is either written out in full, Masoretic verse by Masoretic verse, immediately before the corresponding Targum of each verse; or it is provided, in some witnesses, in columns running parallel with the corresponding Aramaic.6 In MS Copenhagen 10.3 (5,11)theHebrewwords beginning a verse may sometimes be provided as introduction for the Targum of that verse. The presence of the Hebrew Text in these, the vast majority of witnesses, does not form part of the fabric of the Targum’s text, and thus of its literary constitution; it does, however, allow us to make some preliminary observations.7 4) See B. Grossfeld, The Targum Sheni to the Book of Esther: A Critical Edition Based on MS Sassoon 282 with Critical Apparatus (New York: Sepher-Hermon Press, 1994). 5) TheevidenceissetoutsuccinctlybyB.Grossfeld,The Two Targums of Esther: Translated with Apparatus and Notes (The Aramaic Bible, 18;Edinburgh:T&TClark,1991), pp. 3–6; see also B. Ego, Targum Scheni zu Esther: Übersetzung, Kommentar und theologische Deutung (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1996), pp. 8–9. 6) MS Sassoon 282 has the Hebrew verse written out in full before its Targum: similarly MS Nürnberg, Municipal Library, Solg. MS 1.7.20; MS Breslau Stadts Bibliotek 1106;MSBerlin 35;MSHamburg-Levy13 (5); MS Parma 3231 (Rossi 31); and MS Parma 3235 (Rossi 42/1). Witnesses with the Hebrew supplied in a column parallel to the corresponding Targum include MS Budapest National Museum 2°4; MS Sydney University, Nicholson 33;MS Ambrosiana Milan 5/3 (B 35 Inf.); and MS Moscow-Ginzburg 119/7, although some of these also alternate the Hebrew with its Aramaic Targum: see Grossfeld, The TwoTargums,pp.4–5. 7) The edition of Paul de Lagarde in Hagiographa Chaldaice (Leipzig: Teubner, 1873)includes no Hebrew verses, and reproduces the text of Targum Sheni given in the First Rabbinic Bible of Felix Pratensis (Venice: Bomberg 1516/1517)..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • אוסף מרמורשטיין the Marmorstein Collection
    אוסף מרמורשטיין The Marmorstein Collection Brad Sabin Hill THE JOHN RYLANDS LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER Manchester 2017 1 The Marmorstein Collection CONTENTS Acknowledgements Note on Bibliographic Citations I. Preface: Hebraica and Judaica in the Rylands -Hebrew and Samaritan Manuscripts: Crawford, Gaster -Printed Books: Spencer Incunabula; Abramsky Haskalah Collection; Teltscher Collection; Miscellaneous Collections; Marmorstein Collection II. Dr Arthur Marmorstein and His Library -Life and Writings of a Scholar and Bibliographer -A Rabbinic Literary Family: Antecedents and Relations -Marmorstein’s Library III. Hebraica -Literary Periods and Subjects -History of Hebrew Printing -Hebrew Printed Books in the Marmorstein Collection --16th century --17th century --18th century --19th century --20th century -Art of the Hebrew Book -Jewish Languages (Aramaic, Judeo-Arabic, Yiddish, Others) IV. Non-Hebraica -Greek and Latin -German -Anglo-Judaica -Hungarian -French and Italian -Other Languages 2 V. Genres and Subjects Hebraica and Judaica -Bible, Commentaries, Homiletics -Mishnah, Talmud, Midrash, Rabbinic Literature -Responsa -Law Codes and Custumals -Philosophy and Ethics -Kabbalah and Mysticism -Liturgy and Liturgical Poetry -Sephardic, Oriental, Non-Ashkenazic Literature -Sects, Branches, Movements -Sex, Marital Laws, Women -History and Geography -Belles-Lettres -Sciences, Mathematics, Medicine -Philology and Lexicography -Christian Hebraism -Jewish-Christian and Jewish-Muslim Relations -Jewish and non-Jewish Intercultural Influences
    [Show full text]
  • 'How Shall We Kill Him? by Sword, Fire Or Lions?': the Aramaic Targum And
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 11 Original Research ‘How shall we kill him? By sword, fire or lions?’: The Aramaic Targum and the Midrashic narrative on Haman’s gallows Author: The Midrashic literature and biblical translations focus majorly on the verses that describe the 1 Abraham O. Shemesh gathering in Haman’s house and the preparing of the gallows for Mordechai the Jew (Es 5:14). Affiliation: The goal of this study is to discuss the narrative shaped by the Targum and Midrashic sources 1Department of Israel and to examine both the realistic domain concerning methods of punishment that were Heritage, Faculty of Social suggested and the theological–educational meaning of the punishment and the type of tree Sciences and Humanities, chosen. Targum Rishon develops the contents of the conversation in Haman’s house as to how Ariel University, Ariel, Israel Mordechai should be executed. While according to the text, the suggestion to hang Mordechai Corresponding author: appears to have been the only method agreed upon by all those present at the meeting, Targum Abraham Shemesh, Rishon includes several forms of killing and torture that were proposed and considered. While [email protected] Targum Rishon presents the theological meaning of the choice to kill Mordechai specifically by Dates: hanging him from a gallows, a Midrash aggadah attempts to clarify the species of the tree used Received: 07 Oct. 2019 to prepare Mordechai’s gallows and comes to the surprising conclusion that it was a type of Accepted: 25 Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • The Book of Esther Cambridge University Press Ware House
    '!'HE CAMBRIDGE BIBLE FOR SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES GENERAL EDITOR FOR THE OLD TESTAMENT:­ A. F. KIRKPATRICK, D.D. DEAN OF ELY THE BOOK OF ESTHER CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WARE HOUSE, c. F. CLAY, MANAGER. U.onl:lon: FETTER LANE, E.C. 4illasgabJ: 50, WELLINGTON STREET. l.eip)ig: F. A BROCKHAUS, j4cb; liort.: G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS. Jilomua~ anb Qt:alcutta: MACMILLAN AND CO., Lw. [All Rights reserwd] THE BOOK OF ESTHER With Introduction and Notes by THE REY. A. w. STREANE, D.D. Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge CAMBRIDGE: at the University Press r907 Qt11mbtibgt: PRINTED BY JOHN CLAY, M.A. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. PREFACE BY THE GENERAL EDITOR FOR THE OLD TESTAMENT. THE present General Editor for the Old Testament in the Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges desires to say that, in accordance with the policy of his predecessor the Bishop of Worcester, he does not hold himself responsible for the particular interpreta­ tions adopted or for the opinions expressed by the editors of the several Books, nor has he endeavoured to bring them into agreement with one another. It is inevitable that there should be differences of opinion in regard to many questions of criticism and interpretation, and it seems best that these differences should find free expression in different volumes. He has endeavoured to secure, as far as possible, that the general scope and character of the series should be observed, and that views which have ·a reasonable claim to consideration should not be ignored, but he has felt it best that the final responsibility should, in general, rest with the individual contributors.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY of AMERICA Targum Song of Songs
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Targum Song of Songs: Language and Lexicon A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of Semitic and Egyptian Languages and Literatures School of Arts and Sciences Of The Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Andrew W. Litke Washington, D.C. 2016 Targum Song of Songs: Language and Lexicon Andrew W. Litke, Ph.D. Director: Edward M. Cook, Ph.D. Targum Song of Songs (TgSong) contains linguistic features from “literary” Aramaic as found in Targum Onqelos and Targum Jonathan, western Aramaic, eastern Aramaic, Biblical Aramaic, and Syriac. A similar mixing of linguistic features is evident in other targumim, and their language is collectively termed Late Jewish Literary Aramaic (LJLA). Though several of these LJLA texts have been linguistically analyzed, one text that has not received such an analysis is TgSong. Since TgSong expands well beyond the underlying Hebrew, it provides an excellent example from which to analyze distinct linguistic features. This dissertation approaches TgSong in two ways. First, it is a descriptive grammar and includes standard grammatical categories: phonology and orthography, morphology, syntax, and lexical stock. Second, in order to determine how the language is mixed and where the language of TgSong fits into the spectrum of Aramaic dialects, each grammatical feature and lexical item is compared to the other pre-modern Aramaic dialects. This dissertation shows first, that the mixing of linguistic features in TgSong is not haphazard. Individual linguistic features are largely consistent in the text, regardless of their dialectal classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Targum to Esther’
    “That night, sleep deserted the king.” (Esth. 6:1) th 45 International Jewish-Christian Bible Week The Book of Esther th th 28 July to 4 August 2013 THE TARGUMS TO ESTHER Alinda Damsma Slide 1: Introduction Good afternoon everybody and thank you for coming to my presentation. Today I will introduce you to a fascinating, ancient translation of the Book of Esther, the so-called ‘Targum to Esther’. This translation exists in several different versions, and therefore it is better to use the plural and speak of the ‘Targums to Esther’, just like the title on the screen. I will explain the language and function of these targums, I will trace their history, and I will give you some interesting examples that show the specific character of these translations. Slide 2: Introduction to Targum The term ‘targum’ means ‘translation, interpretation’. In general it was used to indicate the trans- lation of the Hebrew Bible in any language. So the Greek Septuagint could also be called a Tar- gum, but it became the specific designation for the ancient Aramaic translations of the Hebrew Bible. The Aramaic targums are fascinating because they often combine translation and interpreta- tion. Therefore, verses can be quite long compared to the Hebrew source text. The practice of Targum seems to have originated in the synagogue in the period when Aramaic gradually replaced Hebrew as the spoken language in the Jewish communities of Palestine and Babylonia from the 5th century BCE onward. The Aramaic speaking Jews no longer understood Biblical Hebrew and therefore had difficulty in understanding the Biblical verses that were read in synagogue.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Intertestamental and Early Rabbinic Literature: an Annotated Bibliographic Resource David W
    JETS 43/4 (December 2000) 577–618 JEWISH INTERTESTAMENTAL AND EARLY RABBINIC LITERATURE: AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHIC RESOURCE DAVID W. CHAPMAN AND ANDREAS J. KÖSTENBERGER* The ˜eld of Jewish literature can be mystifying to the non-specialist. The initial obstacle often is where to go for texts, translations, concordances, and bibliography. Even many researchers more familiar with these materi- als often fail to take advantage of the best critical texts, translations, and helps currently available. The goal of this article is to summarize in a single location the principal texts, translations, and foundational resources for the examination of the central Jewish literature potentially pertinent to the background study of early Christianity.1 Generally the procedure followed for each Jewish writing is to list the single most important work in the categories of bibliography, critical text, translation, concordance/index, lexical or grammatical aides, introduction, and commentary. Where deemed helpful, more than one work may be noted. English translations, introductions, and helps are generally preferred. Also noted in many instances are the language(s) of extant manuscripts and the likely dates of composition (re˘ecting the current scholarly consensus). While the emphasis is on printed editions, some computer-based resources are noted. Space did not permit bibliographies on Samaritan texts or on early Jewish liturgies, papyri, and inscriptions. 1. General Reference Tools (incl. Abbreviations) 1.1 Encyclopedias and Dictionaries Encyclopaedia Judaica (16 vols.; Jerusalem: Keter, 1972). Also on CD-ROM. [EncJud] Freedman, David Noel, ed. The Anchor Bible Dictionary (6 vols.; New York: Double- day, 1992). Useful introductory articles on much intertestamental literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Let My Nation Live.27
    Let My Nation Live.01:Let My Nation Live.01 12/25/12 9:28 AM Page 13 Free Weekly Download @ blog.ArtScroll.com The Throne Room 1 our men approached the Great Palace of Shushan in the early morning light. A glowering guard Fquestioned them briefly and then let them pass. Although they had seen the palace many times before, they stopped for a moment to marvel at the 1 massive, flower-shaped structure. Then they walked past the main entrance, with its immense brass-stud- ded, elaborately carved portals, and came to a mod- est service door around the side of the building. A caretaker showed them in. “We’ve come to work on the throne,” said one of the men, an older fellow with a tangled gray beard. “My men will need buckets of soapy water, clean rags and plenty of fragrant oils.” “I know,” said the caretaker. “They are waiting for you in the throne room. You know the way, so go straight through. I must be running along. There is no end of work to do.” Without another word, he hurried off. 1. Menos HaLevi. Reproduced from "Let My Nation Live" with permission from the copyright holders, ArtScroll/Mesorah Publications Let My Nation Live.01:Let My Nation Live.01 12/25/12 9:28 AM Page 14 Free Weekly Download @ blog.ArtScroll.com 14 L ET M Y N ATION L IVE The gray-bearded man beckoned to his men and set off at a brisk pace. They walked through endless rooms and corridors adorned with colorful paintings and tapestries.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanakh and Textuality in Early Modern Yiddish Literature
    Exegetical Poetics: Tanakh and Textuality in Early Modern Yiddish Literature By Rachel Alexandra Wamsley A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Chana Kronfeld, Chair Professor Robert Alter Professor Naomi Seidman Professor Simon Neuberg Professor Elaine Tennant Spring 2015 Exegetical Poetics: Tanakh and Textuality in Early Modern Yiddish Literature © 2015 by Rachel Alexandra Wamsley Abstract Exegetical Poetics: Tanakh and Textuality in Early Modern Yiddish Literature by Rachel Alexandra Wamsley Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature University of California, Berkeley Professor Chana Kronfeld, Chair This dissertation examines Yiddish literature (1500-1950) as an alternative, even transgressive, vehicle for the transmission of the Hebrew Bible and classical rabbinic interpretation. In biblical works for popular audiences—which included women, children, and even non-Jews—Yiddish enjoyed a relative freedom from literary and doctrinal regulation. Through this freedom to improvise on the biblical canon, I argue, early Yiddish literature discloses hermeneutic and poetic practices inadmissible in contemporary Hebrew literature: humanist textual criticism, ambiguous or subversive midrash, the vivid portrayal of non-Jewish subjectivities. By reading this cultural palimpsest as a single multilingual and transnational history, I access those unsanctioned and clandestine practices in Jewish biblical transmission suppressed in the Hebrew sources. At the same time, the material evidence offered by my work with early Yiddish and Hebrew books sheds light on the entanglement of religious authority and textual transmission. Recent scholarly attention has focused on the social history of the printing house (in contrast to the printing press) as the site of an evolving textual culture in the early modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • Extant Manuscripts of the Targum to Psalms
    EXTANT MANUSCRIPTS OF THE TARGUM TO PSALMS AN ECLECTIC LIST BY WILLEM F. SMELIK April 2, 2003 Extant Manuscripts of the Targum to Psalms Introduction The present catalogue includes almost all of extant manuscripts of Targum of Psalms, inasmuch as they are described in scholarly literature and library catalogues. This cata- logue largely depends on the efforts of authors who described these manuscripts and it is there- fore an eclectic work. Inadvertently, many errors will remain since I did not have the opportunity to check most of the manuscripts in situ. Description In principle the entries have the following structure: Each entry begins with the classmark of the manuscript, eventually followed by other designations such as the number attributed by Kennicott or De–Rossi or old signatures between brackets. This signature may be followed by a name, indicating the editor of (part of) the manu- script. Editions will be mentioned fully in the bibliography. Library and place where the manuscript is being preserved, occasionally with the name of a former owner. The contents of the manuscript, concentrated on Biblical texts and their languages. Physical features: writing material, number of folios, size, number of columns and lines, script, vocalisation, gaps. Catchwords and the like, numbering, the number of quires, the folios within a quire and the way of ruling are not included since most catalogues skip these features. Literary references: scribe, place of origin and date. Often the date is guessed by the au- thor of a catalogue. If various suggestions have been made, these will be noticed. Catalogues and other relevant literature, including the microfilm signature of the Institute of Microfilmed Hebrew Manuscripts in Jerusalem (if present).
    [Show full text]
  • Retelling the Story of Esther in Targum Sheni in Light of Septuagint Traditions – Main Outlines
    Retelling the Story of Esther in Targum Sheni in Light of Septuagint Traditions – Main Outlines Beate Ego I Introduction: Theologisation in Targum Sheni and the Septuagint Targum Sheni on Megillat Esther can be characterised as a targum with a mul- tiplicity of haggadic expansions and embellishments. These expansions aim to create a theologisation of the Hebrew Esther narrative by introducing God into the story. This effort is quite obvious because the biblical story does not make any explicit references to divine action or interference. Since the Hebrew Esther story contains numerous narrative gaps, the story itself challenges its recipients to create a transcendent background of the whole plot which deals with Israel’s deadly threats and divine rescue. Similarly, in the Septuagint with its numerous traditions, the Esther mate- rial undergoes a theologisation, too: as it is well known, the Septuagint gen- erally emphasises certain features of the biblical Esther narrative by adding passages like a prayer performed by Mordecai and one by Esther, both plead- ing to God for salvation (C 1–11; C 12–30). These additions furthermore contain King Ahasuerus’s decree of annihilation (B 1–7) and the king’s counter edict on behalf of the Jews (E 1–24), both of which also contain theological elements. Mordecai’s dream frames this tradition, with the actual dream at the beginning of the story (A 1–11) and its interpretation at the end (F 1–10). Finally, we should remember that Est 5 and its description of Esther’s visit to King Ahasuerus dif- fers significantly from its biblical original.1 Within the topic of “The Targums in Light of Traditions of the Second Temple Period” the question arises as to whether Targum Sheni’s ideas of 1 Cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Midrash of the Messiah
    Risto Santala THE MIDRASH OF THE MESSIAH The Messiah and His Meal in Midrash Ruth Chapters V, VII and VIII and its roots and reflections in corresponding Jewish literature Copyright © 2002 by Risto Santala. Cover copyright © 2002 by Antti Santala ISBN 952-91-4780-5 No part of this book may be reproduced without previous consent of the author: Risto Santala, Kaivokatu 2 A 5, FIN-18100 Heinola, Finland, e-mail: [email protected] This book and three other main Rabbinical studies of the author, “The Messiah in the Old Testament in the Light of Rabbinical Writings”, “The Messiah in the New Testament in the Light of Rabbinical Writings” and “Paul, the Man and the Teacher in the Light of Jewish Sources” can also be found at Internet. Printed by Tummavuoren Kirjapaino Oy, Finland 2002 "Thus says the LORD to his anointed, to Cyrus - I will give you the treasures of darkness and the hoards in secret places." Is. 45:1 - 3. RaSHI explains that "according to rabbis God will say this to the King Messiah". "He reveals deep and mysterious things; he knows what is in the darkness, and the light dwells with him." Daniel 2:22. Midrash Lamentations Rabbah I:51says: "'Light dwells with him'; this is the King Messiah, for it is written: 'Arise, shine, for your light has come'." Is. 60:1 The study is dedicated to Institutum Judaicum Aboense I Table of Content THE PREFACE The topic, its derivation and words of dedication 3 I INTRODUCTION The formulation of the problem and its methodological aspects 9 II FUNDAMENTAL FACTORS IN MIDRASHIC LITERATURE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • QUESTIONS and ANSWERS for the PURIM SEUDAH the Following Questions and Answers Are Kosher for Purim and Year-Round Use
    QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS FOR THE PURIM SEUDAH The following Questions and Answers are Kosher for Purim and Year-Round use: QUESTION: In what year of the Jewish calendar did Purim occur? ANSWER: According to Yalkut Me’am Loez, Achashveirosh came to power in the year 3392, and Haman was hung in 3404. QUESTION: How many years did Purim occur before Chanukah? ANSWER: Approximately 216 years (Sefer Targum Sheini by Rav Tzvi Dov Cohen, Shlita). QUESTION: Why isn’t the Shaim Hashem in the Megillah? ANSWER: Many answer because Hashem’s presence is hidden in the in the subtle events of the Megillah. We may suggest that this is to teach us that we should not fool ourselves--the final battle with Amaleik was not fought then. Only when the final battle is fought before the building of the Third Beis HaMikdash will Hashem’s Name become complete. Hakhel Reminder: Chazal teach that whenever the term ‘HaMelech’ is used in the Megillah in lieu of HaMelech Achashveirosh that it also LeHavdil refers to Hashem (Esther Rabba 3:10). Look out for it and think about how! QUESTION: How many wars between Bnei Yisrael and Amaleik are mentioned in Tanach? ANSWER: Actually, there were at least eleven (11) battles with Amalek in Tanach, in one form or another. In the Torah--3 BATTLES: a) Shemos 17: 8 and Devorim 25:17; b) Bamidbar 14:45; and c) Bamidbar 21:1 and 33:40. In Neviim-- 6 BATTLES : a) Shoftim 3:13; b) Shoftim 6:3; c) Shoftim 6:33; d) Shmuel Aleph 14:48; e) Shmuel Aleph 15:3; f) Shmuel Aleph 30:1.
    [Show full text]