DEFINITION ANALYSIS Volume Victim/Offender Relationships 47

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DEFINITION ANALYSIS Volume Victim/Offender Relationships 47 1999 CRIME IN TEXAS DEFINITION Victim/Offender Relationships The largest percentage of family violence reports The Texas Family Code defines Family Violence as an act by a member of a family or household was between married spouses. The second most commonly reported relationship among offenders against another member that is intended to result in physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or a threat that and victims was common-law spouses and the third reasonably places the member in fear of imminent most common relationship was roommates. physical harm. The law excludes the reasonable discipline of a child and defines abuse as physical Relationshio of Victim to Offender Relation- Group Victim's Percent injury that results in substantial harm or genuine ship Type Percent Relationship of Total threat; sexual contact, intercourse, or conduct; or Husband 5.7 compelling or encouraging the child to engage in Wife 25.8 sexual conduct. Marital 56.2% Common-Law Husband 3.3 Common-Law Wife 17.4 By definition and for the purposes of family violence Ex-Husband 0.8 reports, 'Family' includes individuals related by con­ Ex-Wife 3.2 sanguinity (blood) or affinity, marriage or former Father 1.9 marriage, biological parents of the same child fos­ Mother 5.0 ter children, foster parents, and members or f~rmer Son 2.4 members of the same household (including room­ Daughter 3.4 mates). Parental/ 15.7% Stepfather 0.8 Child Stepmother 0.3 Step-Son 0.8 ANALYSIS Step-Daughter 1.0 Foster Parent 0.05 Volume Foster Child 0.02 Grandfather 0.1 The total reported number of Texas family violence Grandmother 0.3 incidents in 1999 was 177,176. This represented a Grandson 0.09 .8 percent increase when compared to 1998. These Granddaughter 0.2 incidents involved 192,202 victims (up .5 percent Brother 2.9 from 1998) and 186,265 offenders (down .6 percent Sister 3.7 from 1998). Step-Brother 0.1 Other 28.1% Step-Sister 0.1 Family Male Roommate 2.8 Family Violence 1999 1998 % Change Female Roommate 8.4 Reported Incidents 177,176 175,725 +0.8% Male In-Law 1.1 Reported Victims 192,202 191,324 +0.5% Female In-Law 1.4 Reported Offenders 186,265 187,412 -0.6% Other Male Family Member 2.1 Other Female Family Membet 4.5 Unk. Relationship-Male 0.07 Unk. Relationship-Female 0.2 47 FAMILY VIOLENCE 1999 CRIME IN TEXAS Victims Family Violence Offenders Incidents of family violence in 1999 involved 192,202 victims. Of the victims whose sex was by Age known, 25 percent were male and 75 percent 0-14 were female. The age group with the highest num­ 15-19 ber of victims was the 20-to-24 year-old bracket. 20-24 25-29 30-34 Of the victims whose ethnicity was known, 35 per­ 35-39 cent were Hispanic and 65 percent were not 40-44 Hispanic. For the victims whose race was known, 45-49 7 4 percent were listed as White, 25 percent were 50-54 Black, and 1 percent were American Indian or 55-59 60-64 ~Offenders Alaskan Native and Asian or Pacific Islander. Of 65-69 the White victims, 75 percent were female, 75 per­ 70+ cent of the Black victims were female, 76 percent of the American Indian or Alaskan Native victims were female and 76 percent of the Asian or Pacific Islander victims were female. Hispanic. Of the offenders whose race was known, 72 percent were White, 27 percent were Family Violence Victims Black, and less than 1 percent were American by Age Indian or Alaskan Native and Asian or Pacific Islander. An examination of offenders by race finds that 78 percent of the White offenders were THOUSANDS male, 73 percent of the Black offenders were male, 73 percent of the American Indian or Alaskan Native offenders were male, and 67 per­ cent of the Asian or Pacific Islander offenders were male. Officer Assaults A serious problem inherent to police intervention and investigation of family violence is the potential for law officers to be assaulted. In 1999, during. the course of responding to family violence inci­ dents, 564 Texas law officers were assaulted. By contrast, Uniform Crime Reports for 1999 listed 5,019 assaults on law officers during all types of police activity. Offenses Offense information in the family violence program Offenders is collected according to federal UCR guidelines and do not necessarily conform to Texas state In 1999, 186,265 offenders were involved in inci­ definitions. Complete offense definitions are avail­ dents of family violence. Of the offenders whose able in the appendix to this publication. Family vio­ sex was known, 78 percent were male and 22 per­ lence offense information falls into six general cat­ cent were female. The age group showing the egories: assaults, homicides, kidnapping/abduc­ highest number of offenders was the 35-to-39 tions, robberies, forcible sex offenses, and non­ year-old bracket. forcible sex offenses. Of the six main categories, assaults accounted for 98% of all offenses. Of the offenders whose ethnicity was known, 36 Information for each individual crime is represent­ percent were Hispanic and 64 percent were not ed in the chart on the next page. 48 1999 CRIME IN TEXAS FAMILY VIOLENCE Family Violence Offenses Of the apparent major injuries, severe lacerations were the most common at 32 percent. Possible internal injuries were reported in 29 percent of the Type Group% Offense % apparent major injury reports, and apparent bro­ Aggravated Assault 15.6% ken bones were noted in 13 percent of the appar­ Assaults: 98.1% Simple Assault 72.1% ent major injury cases. Intimidation 10.4% Murder & Nonnegligent Manslauahter 0.08% Type of Family Violence Injuries Homicides: 0.09% Negligent Manslaughter 0.004% Justifiable Homicide 0.001% Kidnapping/ Kidnapping/Abduction 0.1% Abduction 0.1% Robberv 0.1% Robberv 0.1% Forcible Rape 0.5% Forcible Forcible Sodomy 0.2% Sex 1.5% Sexual Assault w/Object 0.08% Offenses: Forcible Fondling 0.7% Non-Forcible Incest 0.04% Sex Offenses 0.07% Statutory Rape 0.03% Injuries Weapons For the purposes of this family violence report, the police officers who responded to disturbance calls The most common weapon involved in family vio­ determined the extent of injuries and all injuries lence cases was physical force through the use of were considered to be apparent injuries. If later hands, feet, and fists (strong-arm), which accounts medical attention indicated that the injuries were for 76 percent of the incidents. The Texas Family more or less severe than noted by the responding Violence law considers the use of threats and officer, this information is not included in the family intimidation to be serious enough to report and, violence report. The majority of reported injuries thus, 1O percent of the reports were listed as (51%) were considered to be minor injuries. In involving no weapons. Knives or cutting instru­ another 45 percent of family violence reports, 'no ments (4 percent), blunt objects (3 percent), injury' was recorded. Major injuries were reported firearms (2 percent) and other (5 percent) account in 4 percent of the cases. for the remaining cases. Considered as other weapons were motor vehicles, poison, explosives, fire, drugs, unknown, and miscellaneous weapons. Family Violence Major Injuries Unconsciousness 5% Other 21% Weapons Used in Family Broken Bones Violence stunt None 10% Knife 4% Object Strong 3% Arm Firearm 2% Other 5% 49 FAMILY VIOLENCE 1999 CRIME IN TEXAS FAMILY VIOLENCE BY JURISDICTION AGENCY INCIDENTS AGENCY INCIDENTS ANDERSON COUNTY BEXAR COUNTY Anderson CO SO 100 Bexar CO SO 1,321 Palestine PD 280 San Antonio PD 8,100 ANDREWS COUNTY Alamo Heights PD 18 Andrews CO SO 19 Balcones Heights PD 18 Andrews PD 40 Castle Hills PD 13 ANGELINA COUNTY Converse PD 24 Angelina CO SO 218 Hollywood Park PD 6 Diboll PD 38 Kirby PD 87 Huntington PD 6 Leon Valley PD 46 Olmos Park PD 7 Lufkin PD 303 Terrell Hills PD 4 ARANSAS COUNTY Universal City PD 101 Aransas CO SO 82 Windcrest PD 18 Aransas Pass PD 60 Live Oak PD 33 Rockport PD 58 UT H/S Ctr San Antonio PD 1 ARCHER COUNTY UT San Antonio PD 4 Archer CO SO 4 Alamo Comm. College Dist. PD 1 Holliday PD 3 Selma PD 1 ARMSTRONG COUNTY Somerset PD 10 Armstrong CO SO 5 Helotes PD 9 ATASCOSA COUNTY St. Mary's Univ PD 2 Atascosa CO SO 121 Fair Oaks Ranch PD 4 Lytle PD 28 BLANCO COUNTY Pleasanton PD 62 Blanco CO SO 16 Poteet PD 42 Blanco PD 7 Jourdanton PD 15 Johnson City PD 4 AUSTIN COUNTY BORDEN COUNTY Austin CO SO 37 Borden CO SO 4 Bellville PD 9 BOSQUE COUNTY Sealy PD 11 Bosque CO SO 12 Wallis PD 20 Clifton PD 6 BAILEY COUNTY Meridian PD 3 Bailey CO SO 3 BOWIE COUNTY Bowie CO SO 224 Muleshoe PD 26 De Kalb PD 12 BANDERA COUNTY Nash PD 14 Bandera CO SO 101 New Boston PD 1 BASTROP COUNTY Texarkana PD 461 Bastrop CO SO 235 Wake Village PD 27 Bastrop PD 56 Hooks PD 13 Elgin PD 46 BRAZORIA COUNTY Smithville PD 27 Brazoria CO SO 847 BAYLOR COUNTY Alvin PD 126 Baylor CO SO 5 Angleton PD 162 Seymour PD 20 Clute PD 18 BEE COUNTY Danbury PD 7 Bee CO SO 70 Freeport PD 91 Beeville PD 180 Lake Jackson PD 99 BELL COUNTY Manvel PD 39 Bell CO SO 253 Pearland PD 185 Belton PD 89 Richwood PD 18 Harker Heights PD 63 Sweeny PD 10 Killeen PD 1,323 West Columbia PD 16 Nolanville PD 16 Alvin Comm Coll PD 1 Temple PD 740 Brazoria PD 29 Central Tx College PD 7 Jones Creek PD 4 Morgans Point Resort PD 6 Surfside Beach PD 8 Oyster Creek PD 2 50 1999 CRIME IN TEXAS FAMILY VIOLENCE AGENCY INCIDENT AGENCY INCIDENT BRAZOS COUNTY CASTRO COUNTY Brazos CO SO 187 Castro CO SO 2 Bryan PD 537 Dimmitt PD 33 College Station PD 178 Hart PD 8 BREWSTER COUNTY CHAMBERS COUNTY Brewster CO SO 2 Chambers CO SO 78 Alpine PD 41 Mont Belvieu PD 22 Sul Ross St Univ PD 5 CHEROKEE COUNTY BRISCOE COUNTY
Recommended publications
  • Proposal to Reduce Recidivism Rates in Texas - 2010 Update Marcia Johnson Professor Thurgood Marshall School of Law, [email protected]
    ECI Interdisciplinary Journal for Legal and Social Policy Volume 1 | Issue 1 Article 5 4-8-2011 Proposal to Reduce Recidivism Rates in Texas - 2010 Update Marcia Johnson Professor Thurgood Marshall School of Law, [email protected] Katherine Bauer Thurgood Marshall School of Law, [email protected] Elizabeth Tagle Thurgood Marshall School of Law, [email protected] Recommended Citation Johnson, Marcia Professor; Bauer, Katherine; and Tagle, Elizabeth (2011) "Proposal to Reduce Recidivism Rates in Texas - 2010 Update," ECI Interdisciplinary Journal for Legal and Social Policy: Vol. 1: Iss. 1, Article 5. Available at: http://ecipublications.org/ijlsp/vol1/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ECI Interdisciplinary Scholarship and Publications. It has been accepted for inclusion in ECI Interdisciplinary Journal for Legal and Social Policy by an authorized administrator of ECI Interdisciplinary Scholarship and Publications. Johnson et al.: Recidivism Rates in Texas - 2010 Proposal to Reduce Recidivism Rates in Texas – 2010 Update Professor Marcia Johnson, Katherine Bauer and Elizabeth Tagle Reprinted with permission from the Earl Carl Institute Preface In 2003, the Earl Carl Institute launched research programs to advocate for the reduction of recidivism through enhanced educational programs for prison inmates. The Institute’s focus continues to be the enhancement of the quality of life for all Americans and not solely for the provision of services to prison inmates. However, our research of 2003 and current updates strongly support redirecting some of the large sums of money that has been poured into imprisoning Americans toward educating them. In 2009, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) adopted a resolution calling upon their branches to actively educate their members to the socio- economic benefits of providing higher education opportunities to prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Needs Assessment 2
    1 Julie Priego Divisional Director for Prevention & Intervention Services [email protected] (915) 782-4000 Ext. 1323 Priscilla Cortez, CPS Program Director [email protected] (915) 782-4000 Ext. 1321 Antonio Martinez, MSP Regional Evaluator [email protected] (915) 782-4000 Ext. 1322 1626 Medical Center, 3rd Floor El Paso, Texas 79915 (915) 782-4000 2019 Regional Needs Assessment 2 This publication is available for download on the PRC-10 website: www.prc10tx.org Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Prevention Resource Centers ...................................................................................................................... 8 Our Purpose .............................................................................................................................................. 8 How We Help the Community .................................................................................................................. 9 Conceptual Framework ............................................................................................................................. 10 Adolescence ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Epidemiology........................................................................................................................................... 10 Socio-Ecological
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Public Safety Threat Overview 2013 (PDF)
    UNCLASSIFIED Texas Public Safety Threat Overview 2013 Texas Public Safety Threat Overview 2013 A State Intelligence Estimate Produced by the Texas Department of Public Safety In collaboration with other law enforcement and homeland security agencies February 2013 1 UNCLASSIFIED Texas Public Safety Threat Overview 2013 Executive Summary (U) Texas faces the full spectrum of threats, and the state’s vast size, geography, and large population present unique challenges to public safety and homeland security. Texas employs a systematic approach to detect, assess, and prioritize public safety threats within seven categories: crime, terrorism, motor vehicle crashes, natural disasters, public health threats, industrial accidents and cyber threats. (U) Crime threatens the safety, security and freedom of people. Sadly, one needs only to look to our neighbor to the south to view the impact that organized crime can have on a nation and its citizens. Some 60,000 men and woman have been killed in Mexico since 2006, with a substantial number of brutal tortures and beheadings. (U) Index crimes measured by the Uniform Crime Reporting system have decreased throughout Texas and the nation, which is encouraging, as the eight index crimes include homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, motor vehicle theft, larceny, and arson. These are referred to as index crimes because they were selected in the 1930s to provide an index of the general level of criminal activity. From 2010 to 2011, the most recent year for which complete data is available, the volume of index crimes in Texas declined 6.4 percent and the crime rate declined 8.3 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Resources and Legal
    Comment from Bastrop County JP 1 Office: Please be 2019–2020 REFERRAL advised that this original document has been edited to a condensed version due to the original file size. We have reduced some DIRECTORY content to adhere to topic resources and to reference Bastrop County eliminating other Legal Services and Other Resources counties not relevant to our area. If you wish to view the document in for Low-Income Texans full, please visit www.tjctc.org Published by the LEGAL ACCESS DIVISION OF THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS P.O. Box 12487 . Austin, Texas 78711-2487 512-427-1855 or 800-204-2222, Ext. 1855 . Fax: 512-427-4160 [email protected] . www.texasbar.com/referraldirectory Table of Contents Statewide Resources – Civil Legal, Government and Related Agency Resources ...................................................................................................... 1 • Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Information ................................................................................................. 1 • Children/Minors ................................................................................................................................................... 1 • Civil Rights/Discrimination ................................................................................................................................... 2 • Consumer ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 • Disability .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Crime in Te~As
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. • National Criminal Justice Reference Service This mic~c>fiche was produced from documents received for inclusion in the NCJRS data base. Since NCJRS cannot exercise control over the physical condition of the documents submitted, the individual frame quality will vary. The resolution chart on this frame may be used to evaluate the document, quality. CRIME IN TE~AS 2 5 CALEN ~R YEAR 1982 1.0 11111 . -- 2.2 III 14 UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING BUREAU 111111.25 11111 . IIIIII.~ CRIME RECORDS DIVISION \\ ,~ " '! t TEXAS ", I, MICROCOPY RESOLUTION TEST CHART DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS-1963-A ; COMMISSION JAMES B. ADAMS I~ J ,- CHARLES D. NASH DIRECTOR J~ __ Microfilming procedures used to create this fiche comply with CHAIRMAN ) the standards set forth in 41CFR 101-11.::>04. " I W. C. (BILL) PERRYMAN , ,I LEO E. GOSSETT SHANNON H. RATLIFF ASST. DIRECTOR Points of view or opinions stated in this document alre those of the author(s) and do not represent the official position or policies of the U. S. Department of Justice. , . National Institute of Justice 1 United States Department of Justice Washington, D. C. 20531 , '}" ... ;1~li2i~, [.,." , Ii.. TEXAS CRIME REPORT 1982 AN ANNUAL REPORT COMPILED BY THE UNIFORM CRIME REPORTING BUREAU CRIME RECORDS DIVISION TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 5805 NORTH LAMAR BOULEVARD AUSTIN, TEXAS . ". U~S.~of~ / ,.' . .~I.... tIhrt.¢J~ I'·: T1IIa dQcomenlhas'~ ~oced ltXactiy ·as·rac;elval f('Cin\ h . ,i ~or (lrga0lZ1i.1Ion Origioatltlgit Points of view or OpIniori ••hlllld iriu,i$.~IMn1 .re IhoM ~ 1M aLithci(s and dO not.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Tough?:Tough?: an Analysis of Incarceration and Crime Trends in the Lone Star State
    TEXAS TOUGH? JUSTICE POLICY INSTITUTE OCTOBER 2000 www.cjcj.org EAST COAST: 1234 Massachusetts Ave NW, Suite C1009 Washington, DC 20005 202-737-7270 • Fax: 202-737-7271 WEST COAST: 1622 Folsom Street San Francisco, CA 94103 415-621-5661 • Fax: 415-621-5466 TexasTexas Tough?:Tough?: An Analysis of Incarceration and Crime Trends in the Lone Star State The Justice Policy Institute is a project of the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice Page 1 THE JUSTICE POLICY INSTITUTE Texas Tough?: An Analysis of Incarceration and Crime Trends in The Lone Star State1 Advisory Board Members: ALVIN J. BRONSTEIN Director Emeritus Introduction National Prison Project of the ACLU The United States holds the dubious distinction of having the MEDA CHESNEY-LIND, PHD University of Hawaii at Manoa largest incarcerated population in the world, with 2 million people Women’s Studies Program behind bars as of year-end 1999.2 With only 5% of the world’s ELLIOTT CURRIE, PHD Center for the Study of Law and Society 3 University of California at Berkeley population, the U.S. holds a quarter of the world’s prisoners. In TERENCE HALLINAN the 1990s alone, more persons were added to prisons and jails than District Attorney City and County of San Francisco in any other decade on record.4 While all states have increased their RONALD HAMPTON prison populations over the last two decades, the Justice Policy Executive Director National Black Police Association Institute (JPI) has conducted a series of studies analyzing the JULIANNE MALVEAUX, PHD Last Word Productions, Inc. incarceration records of individual states to put the national numbers JEROME G.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Texas Gang Threat Assessment
    UNCLASSIFIED Texas Gang Threat Assessment November 2018 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK UNCLASSIFIED 1 UNCLASSIFIED Texas Gang Threat Assessment A State Intelligence Estimate Produced by the Texas Joint Crime Information Center Intelligence & Counterterrorism Division Texas Department of Public Safety In collaboration with federal, state, and local law enforcement and criminal justice agencies November 2018 UNCLASSIFIED 2 UNCLASSIFIED THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK UNCLASSIFIED 3 UNCLASSIFIED (U) Executive Summary (U) The key analytic judgments of this assessment are: • (U) Gangs are a significant threat to public safety in Texas. Texas gangs are responsible for high levels of violence throughout the state, such as murder, sex trafficking, armed robbery, and aggravated assault. Texas gangs are heavily involved in the trafficking of methamphetamine, heroin, cocaine, and marijuana, and will often work with each other regardless of race or ideology in order to profit from the trafficking of drugs. We assess there are more than 100,000 gang members in Texas at any given time based on available information and data from multiple sources. • (U) Gangs in Texas continue to work closely with the Mexican cartels. Gangs provide direct support to cartel drug and human smuggling operations into and throughout Texas and the nation. Cartels also utilize gang members to procure and move weapons and money to Mexico, and sometimes to commit violent crimes on both sides of the border. Given the entrenched connections between gangs and cartels for drug distribution, we are concerned about the role gangs could play in trafficking fentanyl and contributing to the national opioid epidemic.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JOURNAL of TEXAS MUNICIPAL COURTS Class C
    THE RTHE ecorderJOURNAL OF TEXAS MUNICIPAL COURTS June 2020 © 2020 Texas Municipal Courts Education Center. Funded by a grant from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Class C Family Violence: Filling the Gaps in Accountability and Enforcement Molly Hobbs Texas Municipal Courts Fellow Juris Doctor Candidate, 2020, University of Texas School of Law The Significance and Prevalence of Family Violence Crimes In the wake of the COVID-19 crisis, family and domestic violence crimes are making headlines.1 Restrictions, such as stay-at-home orders imposed to keep the virus from spreading, have resulted in increased reports of abuse.2 On April 5, 2020, the United Nations called for urgent action to combat a worldwide surge in cases.3 Family violence crimes are not new to the U.S. court system. The hurdles associated with reporting and accessing relevant data are familiar. The recent rise in incidents, however, has rekindled national attention to the longstanding issues and concerns associated with domestic and family violence. In November 2017, Devin Kelley walked into the First Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs, Texas, killed 26 individuals, and injured dozens more in the deadliest mass shooting in Texas history.4 Kelley had previously been convicted by the Air Force general court-martial on two charges of domestic violence against his wife and stepson.5 His conviction was never reported in the National Crime Information Center database.6 However, Kelley’s history of family violence is not unique when compared to other mass shooting perpetrators. The shooter that claimed 49 lives at Pulse Nightclub in Florida reportedly had a history of beating his wife.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Victim Services 2019 Annual Report
    CRIME VICTIM SERVICES 2019 ANNUAL REPORT CHANGING NEEDS CHANGING SERVICES CRIME VICTIM SERVICES Letter from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton 5 ANNUAL REPORT 2019 Retrospective of the CVC History & Fund 6 CVC Revenue Sources 10 CVC Financial Summary 11 CHANGING CVC Fund Appropriations 12 NEEDS CVC Program Overview 13 CVC Activity Summary 15 CHANGING CVC Applications by Type of Crime 16 SERVICES CVC Applications by Age and Gender 17 CVC Covered Crime-Related Costs 18 CVC Payments by Benefit 21 CVC Payments by Type of Crime 22 CVC Payments by Age and Gender 23 CVC Annual Payout Summary 24 CVC Activity Summary by County 25 Grants Overview 31 Grant Funding & Crime Victims’ Compensation by County 32 (Map of Regions) Other Victim Assistance Grants 39 Victim Coordinator and Liaison Grants 40 Sexual Assault Prevention and Crisis Services Grants 41 Texas Statewide Automated Victim Notification System 42 Domestic Violence High Risk Teams Grant 43 Crime Victim Civil Legal Services Grants 44 Sexual Assault Services Program Grant 45 Victim Assistance Grants Funded by County and Statewide 46 3 Post Office Box 12548, Austin, Texas 78711-2548 • (512) 463-2100 • www.texasattorneygeneral.gov December 9, 2019 The Honorable Greg Abbott, Governor The Honorable Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor The Honorable Dennis Bonnen, Speaker of the House When one becomes an innocent victim of crime, their life is changed indefinitely. The experience can reverberate into all aspects of a victim’s life, as well as the lives of their family and loved ones. To curtail the continuing impact of a crime, it is necessary to provide victims and their families with prompt access to the help that is available.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Department of Public Safety Self-Evaluation Report
    Texas Department of Public Safety Self-Evaluation Report Submitted to the Sunset Advisory Commission September 29, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Agency Contact Information ............................................................................................... 1 II. Key Functions and Performance ......................................................................................... 1 III. History and Major Events.................................................................................................. 27 IV. Policymaking Structure ..................................................................................................... 30 V. Funding ............................................................................................................................. 34 VI. Organization ...................................................................................................................... 50 VII. Guide to Agency Programs ............................................................................................... 79 Law Enforcement Aviation Public Safety ........................................................................................... 81 Commercial Vehicle Enforcement ......................................................................... 86 Corruption Investigations ...................................................................................... 96 Criminal and Traffic Enforcement ....................................................................... 104 Major Criminal Investigations ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Governor's Task Force on Drug Abuse Statewide Strategy for Drug & Violent Crime Control
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. GOVERNOR'S TASK FORCE ON DRUG ABUSE STATEWIDE STRATEGY FOR DRUG & VIOLENT CRIME CONTROL m w Col. James B. Adams Chairman Arthur C.. Eads, / Vice Chairm'an Judge Jorge A. Solis AI Schorre Jerry P. Cunningham John M. Bott STATE OF TEXAS "terry L. Padalino OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION ~obby S. Weaver Ronald F. Ederer Travis p'; Johnson ~ - GOVERNOR WILLIAM P. CLEMENTS, JR. 124687 U.S. Department of Justice Nationallnstlt,ute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly .as recei~e? from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stat~d in this document are those of the authors and do. not nec~ssarlly represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by .' • ., I Texas Criminal JUstlce D1Vls~on Office of the Governor to the National Criminal Justice Reference, Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the copyright owner. Governor's Task Force on Drug Abuse Drug Policy Subcommittee 1990 Statewide Strategy for Drug and Violent Crime Control William P. Clements, Jr., Governor Rider Scott, Executive Director Criminal Justice Division, Office of the Governor p. O. Box 12428, Austin, Texas 78711 INTRODUCTION Table of Contents Introduction to the Strategy I. Nature and Extent of the Problem • Overview ----------------------- 6 • International Smuggling _______________ 9 • Transshipment ____________________ 20 • Domestic Production 25 • End-User Distribution 36 • Analysis by Geographical Region 48 II. Current Law Enforcement Resources Available • Compliance with the National Drug Control Strategy 50 • The Texas Narcotics Control Program 56 • New Legislative Initiatives 74 • State and Local Enforcement Resources 76 • Federal Initiatives in Texas 77 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Crime 6
    Chapter 6 HHateate CCrimerime 2010 CRIME IN TExAs Hate Crime 6 DefiNitiON Hate Crime Bias motivation Bias Group Volume Bias type The Texas Hate Crimes Act, Chapter 411.046 of Nature % (Offense) the Texas Government Code, defines hate crimes as crimes that are motivated by prejudice, hatred, Anti-White 9 or advocacy of violence including, but not limited Anti-Black 66 racial 48.5% to, incidents for which statistics are or were kept Anti-Asian/Pacific Islander 3 under Public Law 101-275 (the Federal Hate Crimes statistics Act). The federal law further Anti-Multi-Racial 4 defines hate crimes as crimes that manifest Anti-Male Homosexual 24 evidence of prejudice based on race, religion, Sexual Anti-Female Homosexual 6 sexual orientation, or ethnicity, and added in 22.5% Orientation 1997, disability. Anti-Homosexual 7 Anti-Bi-sexual 1 Violation against selected groups within Texas has Anti-Arab 5 been recognized as a threat to the safety of Tex- ethnicity/ ans. In an effort to quantify these incidents of bias National 17.8% Anti-Hispanic 21 crimes, the Texas Hate Crimes Act directed every Origin Anti-Other Ethnic/Nat’l Origin 4 law enforcement agency within Texas to report bias offenses to the Department of Public safety. Anti-Jewish 3 Anti-Protestant 3 Anti-Islamic 5 aNalySiS religious 10.7% Anti-Catholic 2 Volume Anti-Other Religion 3 The total number of reported Texas hate crime Anti-Multi-Religion 2 incidents in 2010 was 168. This represents an Anti-Physical 0 increase of 2.4 percent when compared to 2009.
    [Show full text]