DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1802.02141V6 [Physics.Class-Ph] 2 Aug 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1802.02141V6 [Physics.Class-Ph] 2 Aug 2021 Classical Electrodynamics of Extended Bodies 1, P.D. Flammer ∗ 1Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA (Dated: September 14, 2021) We study the classical electrodynamics of extended bodies. Currently, there is no self-consistent dynamical theory of such bodies in the literature. Electromagnetic energy-momentum is not con- served in the presence of charge and some addition is required. The only somewhat suitable addition found to date are point charges. These suffer from infinite self-energy, requiring some renormaliza- tion procedure, and perturbative methods to account for radiation. We review the history that has led to the understanding of these facts. We then investigate possible self-consistent, non-point-charge, classical electrodynamic theories. We start with a Lagrangian consisting only of the Ricci scalar (gravity) and the standard elec- tromagnetic field Lagrangian, and consider additions other than point charges and their associated interaction Lagrangian. Including quadratic terms in the Lagrangian involving first-order derivatives of the electromagnetic field tensor provides sufficient stress-energy terms to allow for conservation of energy-momentum. There are three such independent terms: a direct current-current interac- tion and two curvature-mediated (non-minimally coupled), short-range interactions, one of which changes sign under a parity transformation. These could be interpreted as non-electromagnetic, short-range forces. For the simplest possible theory, with only the metric and the electromagnetic potential 1-form as independent fields, we find a single, stable, spherical (spin-0) solution, which due to an integrable singularity at the solution’s center, has quantized mass and charge. Its charge is smaller than numeric error, and its mass is set by a new constant in the Lagrangian. It has a small, central core of charge surrounded by a wave of alternatingly charged, spherical shells, where the amplitude of the charge density wave is inversely proportional to the radial coordinate. PACS numbers: 03.50.De,04.40.Nr,04.20.-q,03.50.Kk Contents Invariance 20 I. Introduction 1 V. Solutions to Equations of Motion 22 A. Superluminal (Space-Like) Currents 22 II. Historical Review 2 B. Solutions in Flat Space-Time 22 A. Development of Maxwell’s Equations 2 C. Curved Space-Time and Mass/Charge B. Radiation, Self-Interaction, and Special Quantization 23 Relativity 3 1. Lagrangian of Eq. 70 with jµ as C. Issues with Self-Interaction 4 Independent 23 D. Point Charges and Quantum Mechanics 5 2. Lagrangian of Eq. 70 with Aµ as E. Gravity and Electromagnetism 7 Independent 25 III. Mathematical Review of Classical VI. Summary 28 Electrodynamics 8 A. Notation 8 VII. Acknowledgments 28 B.DynamicsofaChargedObject 9 C. Least Action Principle and Deriving References 29 Maxwell’s Equations 11 arXiv:1802.02141v7 [physics.class-ph] 10 Sep 2021 IV. Completing the Stress-Energy Tensor 14 I. INTRODUCTION A. Integrability 14 B. One Possible Addition to the Stress-Energy There is currently no completely suitable theory de- Tensor 15 scribing the dynamics of charged bodies. Feynman, in his C. Principle of Least Action Revisited 16 famous lectures, describes the situation as follows (see [1] D. Least Action, Energy-Momentum Vol.2 Ch. 28): Conservation, and Diffeomorphism You can appreciate that there is a failure of all classical physics because of the quantum- mechanical effects. Classical mechanics is ∗Electronic address: pfl[email protected] a mathematically consistent theory; it just 2 doesn’t agree with experience. It is inter- workable within limited areas, can be given, esting, though, that the classical theory of the basic problem remains unsolved. electromagnetism is an unsatisfactory theory all by itself. There are difficulties associated As we will see in the next section, the root cause of with the ideas of Maxwell’s theory which are these problems is our ignorance of what keeps an electron not solved by and not directly associated with (or other compact charge) compact. As it turns out, it quantum mechanics. You may say, “Perhaps has been very difficult to even postulate a self-consistent there’s no use worrying about these difficul- theory of what could bind an electron (or other compact ties. Since the quantum mechanics is going charge) together; no such theory exists to date. to change the laws of electrodynamics, we In this paper, we attempt to address this fundamen- should wait to see what difficulties there are tal question. This cannot be addressed by treating point after the modification.” However, when elec- charges, as they are compact by construction. Also, this tromagnetism is joined to quantum mechan- cannot be done in a quantum mechanical framework, ics, the difficulties remain. So it will not be a because quantum mechanics presupposes point charges waste of our time now to look at what these (the idea of an extended object is foreign to the theory). difficulties are. Therefore, we investigate the classical electrodynamics of extended bodies. The difficulties come in two flavors: (1) if a charged ob- ject is extended, i.e. it has some non-zero size, it has not been possible to develop self-consistent equations of mo- II. HISTORICAL REVIEW tion for that object; and (2) if we take the point-charge limit (to resolve difficulty 1, or because we think physical We start by reviewing some of the history of the devel- charges are points), the energy of the charge becomes in- opment of the theory of electrodynamics. The main pur- finite. Feynman continues by discussing examples in the pose of this section is to explore the evolution of thought, literature of researchers trying to resolve the infinite en- evolving from Coulomb’s law to the theory of quantum ergy of point charges, finally concluding that all attempts electrodynamics, focusing on the issue of self-interaction, have failed[1]: the resulting self-inconsistency of electrodynamic theory, We do not know how to make a consistent and the necessary introduction of point charges along theory-including the quantum mechanics- with their pathologies. which does not produce an infinity for the self-energy of an electron, or any point charge. And at the same time, there is no satisfactory A. Development of Maxwell’s Equations theory that describes a non-point charge. It’s an unsolved problem. With the invention of the Leyden Jar (a rudimentary th The infinite “self-energy” of a point charge is due to capacitor) in the middle of the 18 century, experimen- self-interaction: its constituent parts repel against the talists were able to repeatably apply charge to various other parts; as one tries to pack charge into a ball, the objects, and determine how charged objects affect each smaller the ball, the harder this is, and more work must other. By 1785, Coulomb had established the mathemat- be done to make it more compact. The result is the en- ical form of this electrostatic force[3], the law being very similar to Newton’s law of gravitation. ergy required to form such a ball is inversely proportional th to the size of the ball; and point charges have infinite self- Near the turn of the 19 century, Alessandro Volta energy. This is in apparent contradiction to the physical invented the voltaic pile (battery). This enabled exper- fact that a very compact electron exists. imentalists to more reliably study electrical flow in cir- Another consequence of self-interaction is radiation: as cuits. In the summer of 1820, Oersted discovered the a charge is accelerated, its interaction with its own field amazing fact that magnetic needles were affected by elec- (in addition to adding to its rest energy) can cause the tric currents, linking what were before thought to be sep- charge to recoil, as momentum is carried away by the arate phenomena, electricity and magnetism[4]. Within fields in the form of radiation. Again, the classical reac- a few months, Biot and Savart successfully determined tion of a charge to radiation is intractable. J.D. Jackson the mathematical behavior of the force between a cur- summarizes this difficulty in his text as (See Sec. 16.1 of rent carrying wire and a magnetic pole[5–7]. By 1827, [2]): Ampere had also shown that solenoids of current carry- ing wire behaved similarly to bar magnets, and studied ...a completely satisfactory classical treat- the magnetic force between two circuits[8]. ment of the reactive effects of radiation does Also in the 1820s, Ohm successfully described that the not exist. The difficulties presented by this current in a conductor was proportional to the electromo- problem touch one of the most fundamen- tive force and the conductance of the material[9]. This tal aspects of physics, the nature of an ele- was the primary “force law” (now called Ohm’s law) used mentary particle. Although partial solutions, by physicists for electrodynamics until near the turn of 3 the 20th century. In 1831, Faraday discovered that mov- elastic medium, called the “luminiferous aether”. How- ing a magnet near a wire circuit induced a current in the ever, although Maxwell used this idea of an underlying circuit, discovering electromagnetic induction[10]. elastic medium to develop the theory, he gave up on hy- Various physicists worked to understand the interac- pothesizing its exact character or role: tion between magnets and currents for the next few decades[11, 12]. One theoretical achievement, which was I have on a former occasion, attempted to important to the development of electromagnetic theory, describe a particular kind of motion and a was the use of “potentials”. In 1857, Kirchhoff first wrote particular kind of strain, so arranged as to the electric force as a combination of the gradient of a account for the phenomena. In the present scalar potential (which had already been used for some paper, I avoid any hypothesis of this kind; time in electrostatic problems) and the time derivative of and in using words such as electric momen- a newly introduced vector potential[13].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Harvard Physics Circle Lecture 14: Magnetism, Biot-Savart, Ampere’S Law
    Harvard Physics Circle Lecture 14: Magnetism, Biot-Savart, Ampere’s Law Atınç Çağan Şengül January 30th, 2021 1 Theory 1.1 Magnetic Fields We are dealing with the same problem of how charged particles interact with each other. We have a group of source charges and a test charge that moves under the influence of these source charges. Unlike electrostatics, however, the source charges are in motion. One of the simplest experiments one can do to gain insight on how magnetism works is observing two parallel wires that have currents flowing through them. The force causing this attraction and repulsion is not electrostatic since the wires are neutral. Even if they were not neutral, flipping the wires would not flip the direction of the force as we see in the experiment. Magnetic fields are what is responsible for this phenomenon. A stationary charge produces only and electric field E~ around it, while a moving charge creates a magnetic field B~ . We will first study the force acting on a charge under the influence of an ambient magnetic field, before we delve into how moving charges generate such magnetic fields. 1 1.2 The Lorentz Force Law For a particle with charge q moving with velocity ~v in a magnetic field B~ , the force acting on the particle by the magnetic field is given by, F~ = q(~v × B~ ): (1) This is known as the Lorentz force law. Just like F = ma, this law is based on experiments rather than being derived. Notice that unlike the electrostatic version of this law where the force is parallel to the electric field (F~ = qE~ ), here, the force is perpendicular to both the velocity of the particle and the magnetic field.
    [Show full text]
  • On the History of the Radiation Reaction1 Kirk T
    On the History of the Radiation Reaction1 Kirk T. McDonald Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 (May 6, 2017; updated March 18, 2020) 1 Introduction Apparently, Kepler considered the pointing of comets’ tails away from the Sun as evidence for radiation pressure of light [2].2 Following Newton’s third law (see p. 83 of [3]), one might suppose there to be a reaction of the comet back on the incident light. However, this theme lay largely dormant until Poincar´e (1891) [37, 41] and Planck (1896) [46] discussed the effect of “radiation damping” on an oscillating electric charge that emits electromagnetic radiation. Already in 1892, Lorentz [38] had considered the self force on an extended, accelerated charge e, finding that for low velocity v this force has the approximate form (in Gaussian units, where c is the speed of light in vacuum), independent of the radius of the charge, 3e2 d2v 2e2v¨ F = = . (v c). (1) self 3c3 dt2 3c3 Lorentz made no connection at the time between this force and radiation, which connection rather was first made by Planck [46], who considered that there should be a damping force on an accelerated charge in reaction to its radiation, and by a clever transformation arrived at a “radiation-damping” force identical to eq. (1). Today, Lorentz is often credited with identifying eq. (1) as the “radiation-reaction force”, and the contribution of Planck is seldom acknowledged. This note attempts to review the history of thoughts on the “radiation reaction”, which seems to be in conflict with the brief discussions in many papers and “textbooks”.3 2 What is “Radiation”? The “radiation reaction” would seem to be a reaction to “radiation”, but the concept of “radiation” is remarkably poorly defined in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lorentz Force
    CLASSICAL CONCEPT REVIEW 14 The Lorentz Force We can find empirically that a particle with mass m and electric charge q in an elec- tric field E experiences a force FE given by FE = q E LF-1 It is apparent from Equation LF-1 that, if q is a positive charge (e.g., a proton), FE is parallel to, that is, in the direction of E and if q is a negative charge (e.g., an electron), FE is antiparallel to, that is, opposite to the direction of E (see Figure LF-1). A posi- tive charge moving parallel to E or a negative charge moving antiparallel to E is, in the absence of other forces of significance, accelerated according to Newton’s second law: q F q E m a a E LF-2 E = = 1 = m Equation LF-2 is, of course, not relativistically correct. The relativistically correct force is given by d g mu u2 -3 2 du u2 -3 2 FE = q E = = m 1 - = m 1 - a LF-3 dt c2 > dt c2 > 1 2 a b a b 3 Classically, for example, suppose a proton initially moving at v0 = 10 m s enters a region of uniform electric field of magnitude E = 500 V m antiparallel to the direction of E (see Figure LF-2a). How far does it travel before coming (instanta> - neously) to rest? From Equation LF-2 the acceleration slowing the proton> is q 1.60 * 10-19 C 500 V m a = - E = - = -4.79 * 1010 m s2 m 1.67 * 10-27 kg 1 2 1 > 2 E > The distance Dx traveled by the proton until it comes to rest with vf 0 is given by FE • –q +q • FE 2 2 3 2 vf - v0 0 - 10 m s Dx = = 2a 2 4.79 1010 m s2 - 1* > 2 1 > 2 Dx 1.04 10-5 m 1.04 10-3 cm Ϸ 0.01 mm = * = * LF-1 A positively charged particle in an electric field experiences a If the same proton is injected into the field perpendicular to E (or at some angle force in the direction of the field.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lorentz Law of Force and Its Connections to Hidden Momentum
    The Lorentz force law and its connections to hidden momentum, the Einstein-Laub force, and the Aharonov-Casher effect Masud Mansuripur College of Optical Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721 [Published in IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 50, No. 4, 1300110, pp1-10 (2014)] Abstract. The Lorentz force of classical electrodynamics, when applied to magnetic materials, gives rise to hidden energy and hidden momentum. Removing the contributions of hidden entities from the Poynting vector, from the electromagnetic momentum density, and from the Lorentz force and torque densities simplifies the equations of the classical theory. In particular, the reduced expression of the electromagnetic force-density becomes very similar (but not identical) to the Einstein-Laub expression for the force exerted by electric and magnetic fields on a distribution of charge, current, polarization and magnetization. Examples reveal the similarities and differences among various equations that describe the force and torque exerted by electromagnetic fields on material media. An important example of the simplifications afforded by the Einstein-Laub formula is provided by a magnetic dipole moving in a static electric field and exhibiting the Aharonov-Casher effect. 1. Introduction. The classical theory of electrodynamics is based on Maxwell’s equations and the Lorentz force law [1-4]. In their microscopic version, Maxwell’s equations relate the electromagnetic (EM) fields, ( , ) and ( , ), to the spatio-temporal distribution of electric charge and current densities, ( , ) and ( , ). In any closed system consisting of an arbitrary distribution of charge and 푬current,풓 푡 Maxwell’s푩 풓 푡 equations uniquely determine the field distributions provided that the휌 sources,풓 푡 푱 and풓 푡 , are fully specified in advance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lorentz Force and the Radiation Pressure of Light
    The Lorentz Force and the Radiation Pressure of Light Tony Rothman∗ and Stephen Boughn† Princeton University, Princeton NJ 08544 Haverford College, Haverford PA 19041 LATEX-ed October 23, 2018 Abstract In order to make plausible the idea that light exerts a pressure on matter, some introductory physics texts consider the force exerted by an electromag- netic wave on an electron. The argument as presented is both mathematically incorrect and has several serious conceptual difficulties without obvious resolu- tion at the classical, yet alone introductory, level. We discuss these difficulties and propose an alternative demonstration. PACS: 1.40.Gm, 1.55.+b, 03.50De Keywords: Electromagnetic waves, radiation pressure, Lorentz force, light 1 The Freshman Argument arXiv:0807.1310v5 [physics.class-ph] 21 Nov 2008 The interaction of light and matter plays a central role, not only in physics itself, but in any freshman electricity and magnetism course. To develop this topic most courses introduce the Lorentz force law, which gives the electromagnetic force act- ing on a charged particle, and later devote some discussion to Maxwell’s equations. Students are then persuaded that Maxwell’s equations admit wave solutions which ∗[email protected] †[email protected] 1 Lorentz... 2 travel at the speed of light, thus establishing the connection between light and elec- tromagnetic waves. At this point we unequivocally state that electromagnetic waves carry momentum in the direction of propagation via the Poynting flux and that light therefore exerts a radiation pressure on matter. This is not controversial: Maxwell himself in his Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism[1] recognized that light should manifest a radiation pressure, but his demonstration is not immediately transparent to modern readers.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 18 Relativity & Electromagnetism
    Electromagnetism - Lecture 18 Relativity & Electromagnetism • Special Relativity • Current & Potential Four Vectors • Lorentz Transformations of E and B • Electromagnetic Field Tensor • Lorentz Invariance of Maxwell's Equations 1 Special Relativity in One Slide Space-time is a four-vector: xµ = [ct; x] Four-vectors have Lorentz transformations between two frames with uniform relative velocity v: 0 0 x = γ(x − βct) ct = γ(ct − βx) where β = v=c and γ = 1= 1 − β2 The factor γ leads to timepdilation and length contraction Products of four-vectors are Lorentz invariants: µ 2 2 2 2 02 0 2 2 x xµ = c t − jxj = c t − jx j = s The maximum possible speed is c where β ! 1, γ ! 1. Electromagnetism predicts waves that travel at c in a vacuum! The laws of Electromagnetism should be Lorentz invariant 2 Charge and Current Under a Lorentz transformation a static charge q at rest becomes a charge moving with velocity v. This is a current! A static charge density ρ becomes a current density J N.B. Charge is conserved by a Lorentz transformation The charge/current four-vector is: dxµ J µ = ρ = [cρ, J] dt The full Lorentz transformation is: 0 0 v J = γ(J − vρ) ρ = γ(ρ − J ) x x c2 x Note that the γ factor can be understood as a length contraction or time dilation affecting the charge and current densities 3 Notes: Diagrams: 4 Electrostatic & Vector Potentials A reminder that: 1 ρ µ0 J V = dτ A = dτ 4π0 ZV r 4π ZV r A static charge density ρ is a source of an electrostatic potential V A current density J is a source of a magnetic vector potential A Under a
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy-Momentum Tensor of Electromagnetic Fields in Matter
    The energy-momentum tensor of electromagnetic fields in matter Rodrigo Medina1, ∗ and J Stephany2, † 1Centro de F´ısica, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas, Apartado 20632 Caracas 1020-A, Venezuela. 2Departamento de F´ısica, Secci´on de Fen´omenos Opticos,´ Universidad Sim´on Bol´ıvar,Apartado Postal 89000, Caracas 1080-A, Venezuela. In this paper we present a complete resolution of the Abraham-Minkowski controversy about the energy-momentum tensor of the electromagnetic field in matter. This is done by introducing in our approach several new aspects which invalidate previous discussions. These are: 1)We show that for polarized matter the center of mass theorem is no longer valid in its usual form. A contribution related to microscopic spin should be considered. This allows to disregard the influencing argument done by Balacz in favor of Abraham’s momentum which discuss the motion of the center of mass of light interacting with a dielectric block. 2)The electromagnetic dipolar energy density −P · E contributes to the inertia of matter and should be incorporated covariantly to the the energy- momentum tensor of matter. This implies that there is also an electromagnetic component in matter’s momentum density given by P × B which accounts for the diference between Abraham and Minkowski’s momentum densities. The variation of this contribution explains the results of G. B. Walker, D. G. Lahoz and G. Walker’s experiment which until now was the only undisputed support to Abraham’s force. 3)A careful averaging of microscopic Lorentz’s force results in the µ 1 µ αβ unambiguos expression fd = 2 Dαβ ∂ F for the force density which the field exerts on matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Lorentz-Violating Electrostatics and Magnetostatics
    Publications 10-1-2004 Lorentz-Violating Electrostatics and Magnetostatics Quentin G. Bailey Indiana University - Bloomington, [email protected] V. Alan Kostelecký Indiana University - Bloomington Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/publication Part of the Electromagnetics and Photonics Commons, and the Physics Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Bailey, Q. G., & Kostelecký, V. A. (2004). Lorentz-Violating Electrostatics and Magnetostatics. Physical Review D, 70(7). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.076006 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lorentz-Violating Electrostatics and Magnetostatics Quentin G. Bailey and V. Alan Kosteleck´y Physics Department, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, U.S.A. (Dated: IUHET 472, July 2004) The static limit of Lorentz-violating electrodynamics in vacuum and in media is investigated. Features of the general solutions include the need for unconventional boundary conditions and the mixing of electrostatic and magnetostatic effects. Explicit solutions are provided for some simple cases. Electromagnetostatics experiments show promise for improving existing sensitivities to parity- odd coefficients for Lorentz violation in the photon sector. I. INTRODUCTION electrodynamics in Minkowski spacetime, coupled to an arbitrary 4-current source. There exists a substantial Since its inception, relativity and its underlying theoretical literature discussing the electrodynamics limit Lorentz symmetry have been intimately linked to clas- of the SME [19], but the stationary limit remains unex- sical electrodynamics. A century after Einstein, high- plored to date. We begin by providing some general in- sensitivity experiments based on electromagnetic phe- formation about this theory, including some aspects as- nomena remain popular as tests of relativity.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.013 Electromagnetics and Applications, Chapter 5
    Chapter 5: Electromagnetic Forces 5.1 Forces on free charges and currents 5.1.1 Lorentz force equation and introduction to force The Lorentz force equation (1.2.1) fully characterizes electromagnetic forces on stationary and moving charges. Despite the simplicity of this equation, it is highly accurate and essential to the understanding of all electrical phenomena because these phenomena are observable only as a result of forces on charges. Sometimes these forces drive motors or other actuators, and sometimes they drive electrons through materials that are heated, illuminated, or undergoing other physical or chemical changes. These forces also drive the currents essential to all electronic circuits and devices. When the electromagnetic fields and the location and motion of free charges are known, the calculation of the forces acting on those charges is straightforward and is explained in Sections 5.1.2 and 5.1.3. When these charges and currents are confined within conductors instead of being isolated in vacuum, the approaches introduced in Section 5.2 can usually be used. Finally, when the charges and charge motion of interest are bound within stationary atoms or spinning charged particles, the Kelvin force density expressions developed in Section 5.3 must be added. The problem usually lies beyond the scope of this text when the force-producing electromagnetic fields are not given but are determined by those same charges on which the forces are acting (e.g., plasma physics), and when the velocities are relativistic. The simplest case involves the forces arising from known electromagnetic fields acting on free charges in vacuum.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy, Momentum, and Symmetries 1 Fields 2 Complex Notation
    Energy, Momentum, and Symmetries 1 Fields The interaction of charges was described through the concept of a field. A field connects charge to a geometry of space-time. Thus charge modifies surrounding space such that this space affects another charge. While the abstraction of an interaction to include an intermedi- ate step seems irrelevant to those approaching the subject from a Newtonian viewpoint, it is a way to include relativity in the interaction. The Newtonian concept of action-at-a-distance is not consistent with standard relativity theory. Most think in terms of “force”, and in particular, force acting directly between objects. You should now think in terms of fields, i.e. a modification to space-time geometry which then affects a particle positioned at that geometric point. In fact, it is not the fields themselves, but the potentials (which are more closely aligned with energy) which will be fundamental to the dynamics of interactions. 2 Complex notation Note that a description of the EM interaction involves the time dependent Maxwell equa- tions. The time dependence can be removed by essentially employing a Fourier transform. Remember in an earlier lecture, the Fourier transformation was introduced. ∞ (ω) = 1 dt F (t) e−iωt F √2π −∞R ∞ F (t) = 1 dt (ω) eiωt √2π −∞R F Now assume that all functions have the form; F (~x, t) F (~x)eiωt → These solutions are valid for a particular frequency, ω. One can superimpose solutions of different frequencies through a weighted, inverse Fourier transform to get the time depen- dence of any function. Also note that this assumption results in the introduction of complex functions to describe measurable quantities which in fact must be real.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maxwell Stress Tensor and Electromagnetic Momentum
    Progress In Electromagnetics Research Letters, Vol. 94, 151–156, 2020 The Maxwell Stress Tensor and Electromagnetic Momentum Artice Davis1, * and Vladimir Onoochin2 Abstract—In this paper, we discuss two well-known definitions of electromagnetic momentum, ρA and 0[E × B]. We show that the former is preferable to the latter for several reasons which we will discuss. Primarily, we show in detail—and by example—that the usual manipulations used in deriving the expression 0[E×B] have a serious mathematical flaw. We follow this by presenting a succinct derivation for the former expression. We feel that the fundamental definition of electromagnetic momentum should rely upon the interaction of a single particle with the electromagnetic field. Thus, it contrasts with the definition of momentum as 0[E × B] which depends upon a (defective) integral over an entire region, usually all space. 1. INTRODUCTION The correct form of the electromagnetic energy-momentum tensor has been debated for almost a century. A large number of papers have been written [1], some of which concentrate upon a single particle interaction with the electromagnetic field in free space [2, 3]; others discuss the interaction between a field and a dielectric material upon which it impinges [4]. In works which discuss the Minkowski-Abraham controversy, the system considered is usually on the macroscopic level. On this level, singularities caused by point charges cannot be treated. We show that neglecting the effect due the properties of classical charges creates difficulties which cannot be resolved within the framework typically discussed by textbooks on classical electrodynamics [5]. Our present concept of electromagnetic field momentum density has two interpretations: (i) As 0[E × B], the scaled Poynting vector.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Fields, Magnetic Forces, and Sources of Magnetic Fields
    Magnetic Fields, Magnetic Forces, and Sources of Magnetic Fields W07D2 1 Announcements Problem Set 6 Due Thursday at 9 pm .This problem set is an introduction to Experiment 1 and the two problems from W06D2. Week 8 LS1 due Mon at 8:30 am Week 8 LS2 due Mon at 8:30 am Week 8 LS3 due Wed at 8:30 am Week 8 LS4 due Wed at 8:30 am 2 Outline Magnetic Field Lorentz Force Law Magnetic Force on Current Carrying Wire Sources of Magnetic Fields Biot-Savart Law 3 Magnetic Field of the Earth North magnetic pole located in southern hemisphere http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtDAOxaJ4Ms 4 Magnetic Force on Moving Charges Force on ! ! positive charge B ! Fq = qvq × B vq B B q vq F F q q B q + B Force on negative charge Magnetic force is perpendicular to both velocity of the charge and magnetic field 5 CQ: Cross Product and Magnetic Force An electron is traveling up in a magnetic field that points to the right. What is the direction of the force on the electron? v 1. Up. q 2. Down. B 3. Left. q = e 4. Right. 5. Into plane of figure. 6. Out of plane of figure. 6 Group Problem: Cyclotron Motion A positively charged particle vq with charge +q and mass m is B moving with speed v in a + uniform magnetic field of + q magnitude B directed into the plane of figure will undergo circular motion. Find (1) the radius R of the orbit, (2) the period T of the motion, (3) the angular frequency ω.
    [Show full text]