Crystal Structure of a Human TATA Box-Binding Protein/TATA Element Complex DIMITAR B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crystal Structure of a Human TATA Box-Binding Protein/TATA Element Complex DIMITAR B Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 4862-4867, May 1996 Cell Biology Crystal structure of a human TATA box-binding protein/TATA element complex DIMITAR B. NIKOLOV*, HUA CHEN*t, ELAINE D. HALAY*t, ALEXANDER HOFFMANNt§, ROBERT G. ROEDERt, AND STEPHEN K. BURLEY*t¶ *Laboratories of Molecular Biophysics, tLaboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and tHoward Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021 Contributed by Robert G. Roeder, January 5, 1996 ABSTRACT The TATA box-binding protein (TBP) is re- Recently, we reported the x-ray crystal structures of TBP quired by all three eukaryotic RNA polymerases for correct isoform 2 (TBP2) fromArabidopsis thaliana (10, 11), a complex initiation of transcription of ribosomal, messenger, small of TBP2 with the TATA element of the adenovirus major late nuclear, and transfer RNAs. The cocrystal structure of the promoter (AdMLP) (12, 13), and a ternary complex of TBP2 C-terminal/core region of human TBP complexed with the with human TFIIB and the AdMLP TATA box (14). TBP2 TATA element ofthe adenovirus major late promoter has been displays a novel, two-domain DNA-binding fold, and the determined at 1.9 A resolution. Structural and functional protein's approximate twofold intramolecular symmetry gen- analyses of the protein-DNA complex are presented, with a erates a saddle-shaped structure dominated by a curved anti- detailed comparison to our 1.9-A-resolution structure ofAra- parallel (3-sheet, forming a concave DNA binding surface. bidopsis thaliana TBP2 bound to the same TATA box. TATA element recognition proceeds via an induced-fit mech- anism, involving subtle conformational changes at the level of the protein and an unprecedented DNA distortion. The seat of Eukaryotes have three distinct RNA polymerases (forms I, II, the saddle presents a large convex surface to which other and III) that catalyze transcription of nuclear genes (1). proteins bind during transcription initiation. TFIIB recognizes Despite their structural complexity, these multisubunit en- the preformed TBP-DNA complex via protein-protein and zymes require sets of auxiliary proteins known as general protein-DNA interactions. The N-terminal portion of TFIIB transcription initiation factors to initiate transcription from forms the downstream surface of the ternary complex, where corresponding class I, II, and III nuclear gene promoters (2-5). it could fix the transcription start site. The remaining surfaces TATA box-binding protein (TBP), first identified as a com- of TBP and the TFIIB can interact with TBP-associated ponent of the class II initiation factor TFIID, participates in factors, other class II initiation factors, and transcriptional transcription by all three nuclear RNA polymerases (reviewed activators and coactivators. in ref. 6). TBP has a phylogenetically conserved, 180-residue We now report the crystal structure of human C-terminal/ C-terminal portion, containing two direct repeats flanking a core TBP (hTBPc) recognizing the AdMLP TATA element. highly basic segment known as the basic repeat. The C-termi- The 1.9-A-resolution structure permits detailed structural and nal/core region of TBP binds to the TATA consensus se- functional analyses of the protein-DNA interactions and pro- quence (TATAa/tAa/t) with high affinity and slow off rate, vides further insights into how TBPs from different organisms recognizing minor groove determinants and inducing a dra- recognize and direct transcription initiation from TATA- matic DNA deformation. The N-terminal portion of TBP containing promoters. varies in length, shows little or no conservation among differ- ent organisms, and is largely unnecessary for transcription in MATERIALS AND METHODS certain yeast strains. The role of TBP in transcription initiation and its regulation Crystallization. hTBPc residues 155-335 (15) fused with an are best understood for genes transcribed by RNA polymerase additional 20 N-terminal amino acids (MGSSHHHHHHSS- II (reviewed in refs. 3 and 4). In this setting, TBP is tightly GLVPRGSH) was overexpressed in Escherichia coli [BL21- associated with other polypeptides known as TBP-associated (DE3)pLysS] using the T7 RNA polymerase system (16). Cells factors (reviewed in ref. 6). This multiprotein complex grown at 30°C to an absorbance of 0.7 at 595 nm and induced (TFIID) is a general initiation factor (7) that binds to the with 0.5 mM isopropyl P3-D-thiogalactopyranoside for 3 h were TATA element, coordinating accretion of class II initiation harvested by low-speed centrifugation. Lysis was performed by factors (TFIIA, -B, -D, -E, -F, -G, -H, and -I) and RNA three cycles of freeze-thaw and DNA digestion was performed polymerase II (pol II) into a functional preinitiation complex by DNase I. The soluble fraction was applied directly to a Ni2+ (PIC) (reviewed in refs. 3 and 8). Although incapable of ion affinity column and washed with a buffer containing mimicking TFIID in vivo (at least in higher eukaryotes; increasing amounts of imidazole. hTBPc with an estimated reviewed in ref. 6), recombinant TBP alone is competent for homogeneity of 95% was then eluted from the resin with a PIC assembly and basal transcription in the presence of the buffer containing 100 mM EDTA. After overnight dialysis, other general class II factors (9). TBP engages in physical and removal of the histidine-containing N-terminal sequence was functional interactions with the general initiation factors TFIIA and TFIIB, the C terminus of the large subunit of pol Abbreviations: AdMLP, adenovirus major late promoter; PIC, preini- tiation complex; TBP, TATA box-binding protein; hTBPc, human core II, some negative cofactors (NC1, NC2, DR1) that inhibit PIC TATA box-binding protein; TBP2, TATA box-binding protein isoform formation, some transcriptional activators, and an initiator- 2; pol II, RNA polymerase II; rmsd, rms deviation. binding factor (TFII-I) that may be important for transcription Data deposition: The atomic coordinates and structure factor ampli- initiation from TATA-less promoters. tudes have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Chemistry Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 (CDW).1 The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge §Present address: Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139. accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. 5To whom reprint requests should be sent at the * address. 4862 Downloaded by guest on September 29, 2021 Cell Biology: Nikolov et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 (1996) 4863 A 155 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 240 III rr rrr r w r r r r r rr b b w pi p w p b b p w b bw w SGIVPQLQNIVSTVNLGCKLDLKTIALR-ARNAEYNPKRFAAVIMRIREPRTTALIFSSGKMVCTGAKSEEQSRLAARKYARVVQKLGFPAKF Si HI S2 53S4 S5 H2 LjDFKIQNMVGSCDVKFPIRLEGLVLTHQQFSSYE PELFPGLIYRMIKPRIVLLIFVSGKVVLTGAKVRAEIYEAFENIYPILKGFRKTT b b ib p w b b p w b bw p rr rrr r r r r r r r III rI 28 250 260 270 2 290 300 310 320 330 B 1 3 5 7 5'C T G C T A T AAA A G G C T G G A C G A T A T T T T C C G A C 5r 1 3' 5 7' FIG. 1. (A) Sequence of the 180-amino acid conserved C-terminal region of human TBP with the two direct repeats aligned one above the other. a-Helix and 13-strand regions are shaded and labeled (' denotes second direct repeat), and the two "stirrups" are boxed. Residues interacting with DNA are labeled according to interaction type: b, base; p, phosphate; r, ribose; i, intercalating phenylalanine; w, water mediated. Protein numbering is that of full-length human TBP (15) and corresponds to the A. thaliana numbering plus 136 and Saccharomyces cerevisiae numbering plus 94. A full conversion scheme can be found in ref. 10. (B) Sequence of 16-base-pair oligonucleotide used for cocrystallization, with the 8-base-pair TATA box of the AdMLP shaded. DNA numbering scheme is identical to that used in ref. 13. Position 1 of the TATA box corresponds to base pair -31 in the AdMLP, and ' denotes bottom strand. performed by trypsin cleavage of the peptide bond between R were transiently "cryoprotected" in a 10% glycerol/25% eth- and G in the above sequence to yield hTBPc-(155-335) plus 4 ylene glycol/1 mM MgCl2/5 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.5, mixture N-terminal amino acids-namely, GSHM. A final cation- before freezing on a platform created by a loop of ophthal- exchange chromatography step to remove the protease and any mological suture material (10-0 Ethilon, Ethicon). Oscillation remaining contaminants yielded material of homogeneity es- photographs were integrated, scaled and merged using DENZO timated to be 98% or greater. Mass spectrometry documented and SCALEPACK. Molecular replacement (MR) was carried out that the TBP used for crystallization was neither modified nor with X-PLOR (17) using the structure of the TBP2-DNA further proteolyzed during expression and purification. The complex (12, 13). Patterson correlation refinement of the measured molecular mass was 20,829 ± 5, compared with rotation function search maxima yielded a solution with cor- 20,825 calculated from the predicted amino acid sequence. relation coefficient 0.216. A translation search in X-Y-Z, gave Further control experiments were performed to ensure that a final MR solution 14.2cr above the mean peak level. Rigid the protein used for the crystallographic study was biochem- body refinement of the search model, followed by positional ically active and indistinguishable from recombinant yeast and simulated annealing refinement with X-PLOR, gave Rfactor TBP. Gel-retardation analyses, performed as described (11), = 0.26 at 3.0 A resolution. At this point, (2IFobservedI - confirmed that the purified protein had full TBP DNA-binding IFcalculatedl) and (lFobservedi - lFcalculatedl) difference maps were activity (data not shown).
Recommended publications
  • Preinitiation Complex
    Science Highlight – June 2011 Transcription Starts Here: Structural Models of a “Minimal” Preinitiation Complex RNA polymerase II (pol II) plays a central role in the regulation of gene expression. Pol II is the enzyme responsible for synthesizing all the messenger RNA (mRNA) and most of the small nuclear RNA (snRNA) in eukaryotes. One of the key questions for transcription is how pol II decides where to start on the genomic DNA to specifically and precisely turn on a gene. This is achieved during transcription initiation by concerted actions of the core enzyme pol II and a myriad of transcription factors including five general transcription factors, known as TFIIB, -D, -E, -F, -H, which together form a giant transcription preinitiation complex on a promoter prior to transcription. One of the most prominent core promoter DNA elements is the TATA box, usually directing transcription of tissue-specific genes. TATA-box binding protein (TBP), a key component of TFIID, recognizes the TATA DNA sequence. Based on the previous crystallographic studies, the TATA box DNA is bent by nearly 90 degree through the binding of TBP (1). This striking structural feature is thought to serve as a physical landmark for the location of active genes on the genome. In addition, the location of the TATA box at least in part determines the transcription start site (TSS) in most eukaryotes, including humans. The distance between the TATA box and the TSS is conserved at around 30 base pairs. TBP does not contact pol II directly and the TATA-containing promoter must be directed to the core enzyme through another essential transcription factor TFIIB.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Biology and Applied Genetics
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND APPLIED GENETICS FOR Medical Laboratory Technology Students Upgraded Lecture Note Series Mohammed Awole Adem Jimma University MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND APPLIED GENETICS For Medical Laboratory Technician Students Lecture Note Series Mohammed Awole Adem Upgraded - 2006 In collaboration with The Carter Center (EPHTI) and The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Education and Ministry of Health Jimma University PREFACE The problem faced today in the learning and teaching of Applied Genetics and Molecular Biology for laboratory technologists in universities, colleges andhealth institutions primarily from the unavailability of textbooks that focus on the needs of Ethiopian students. This lecture note has been prepared with the primary aim of alleviating the problems encountered in the teaching of Medical Applied Genetics and Molecular Biology course and in minimizing discrepancies prevailing among the different teaching and training health institutions. It can also be used in teaching any introductory course on medical Applied Genetics and Molecular Biology and as a reference material. This lecture note is specifically designed for medical laboratory technologists, and includes only those areas of molecular cell biology and Applied Genetics relevant to degree-level understanding of modern laboratory technology. Since genetics is prerequisite course to molecular biology, the lecture note starts with Genetics i followed by Molecular Biology. It provides students with molecular background to enable them to understand and critically analyze recent advances in laboratory sciences. Finally, it contains a glossary, which summarizes important terminologies used in the text. Each chapter begins by specific learning objectives and at the end of each chapter review questions are also included.
    [Show full text]
  • Tnlo-Encoded Tet Repressor Can Regulate an Operator-Containing
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 85, pp. 1394-1397, March 1988 Biochemistry TnlO-encoded tet repressor can regulate an operator-containing plant promoter (cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter/electroporation/transient chloramphenicol acetyltransferase assays) CHRISTIANE GATZ* AND PETER H. QUAILt Departments of Botany and Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 Communicated by Folke Skoog, October 26, 1987 (receivedfor review July S, 1987) ABSTRACT The TnlO-encoded tet repressor-operator The TnlO-encoded tet repressor regulates the expression system was used to regulate transcription from the cauliflower of the Tc resistance operon by binding to nearly identical mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter. Expression was moni- operator sequences that overlap with three divergent pro- tored in a transient assay system by using electric field- moters (14, 15). The genes of the tet operon are only mediated gene transfer ("electroporation") into tobacco pro- transcribed in the presence of the inducer Tc, which pre- toplasts. The tet repressor, being expressed in the plant cells vents the repressor from binding to its operator sequences. under the control of eukaryotic transcription signals, blocks The tet repressor was chosen for regulating a plant promoter transcription of a CaMV 35S promoter chloramphenicol ace- for two reasons. (i) With a native molecular mass of 48 kDa, tyltransferase (cat) fusion gene when the two tet operators diffusion into the nucleus seemed likely (16). (ii) The high flank the "TATA" box. In the presence of the inducer equilibrium association constant of the repressor-inducer tetracycline, expression is restored to full activity. Location of complex ensures efficient induction at sublethal Tc concen- the operators 21 base pairs downstream of the transcription trations (17), thus making the system useful as an on/off start site does not significantly affect transcription in the switch for the specific regulation of transferred genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Control of Gene Expression
    Control of! Gene Expression Heterochromatin vs Euchromatin • heterochromatin • euchromatin – tight coils of DNA – loose coils of DNA Regulatory Elements in Gene Expression • promoter (TATA) • transcription factors • enhancers/activators • repressors Prok vs Euk ! DNA arrangement 1. 1x circular DNA 1. multiple, linear chs 2. 1x origin of 2. multiple origins replication 3. no operons 3. operon control 4. many introns 4. no introns 5. modifications (*methylation) 6. transposons Prok vs Euk ! Transcription & Translation 1. tcn & tln in cytoplasm 1. tcn (nucleus); tln (cytoplasm) 2. no post-transcriptional 2. post-transcriptional modifications modifications (methylation, 5’cap & 3’tail) 3. no introns 3. introns spliced out 4. 70S ribosome 4. 80S ribosome • RNA polymerase • aminoacyl synthase (adds aa to tRNA) • transcription factors • peptidyl transferase (makes peptide bonds) lac Operon • inducible – always “OFF” (negative control) • turned ON by inducer (lactose); inactivates the repressor lac Operon - cast of characters • promotor TATA box, transcription factors, RNA polymerase • lacI – gene for repressor • lacZ, lacY, and lacA - genes for metabolizing lactose (galactosidase, permease, transacetylase) • inducer - lactose sugar trp Operon • repressible – always “ON” (positive control) • turned OFF by negative feedback - product tryptophan binds to repressor lac Operon model *grocery shopping • repressor – credit card bill • inducer – paycheck • gene A – taking money out of an ATM • gene B – driving to a supermarket • gene C – pushing a shopping
    [Show full text]
  • The Symmetry of the Yeast U6 RNA Gene's TATA Box and the Orientation of the TATA-Binding Protein in Yeast TFIIIB
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 29, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The symmetry of the yeast U6 RNA gene's TATA box and the orientation of the TATA-binding protein in yeast TFIIIB Simon K. whitehall,' George A. Kassavetis, and E. Peter Geiduschek Department of Biology and Center for Molecular Genetics, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0634 USA The central RNA polymerase I11 (Pol 111) transcription factor TFIIIB is composed of the TATA-binding protein (TBP), Brf, a protein related to TFIIB, and the product of the newly cloned TFC5 gene. TFIIIB assembles autonomously on the upstream promoter of the yeast U6 snRNA (SNR6)gene in vitro, through the interaction of its TBP subunit with a consensus TATA box located at base pair -30. As both the DNA-binding domain of TBP and the U6 TATA box are nearly twofold symmetrical, we have examined how the binding polarity of TFIIIB is determined. We find that TFIIIB can bind to the U6 promoter in both directions, that TBP is unable to discern the natural polarity of the TATA element and that, as a consequence, the U6 TATA box is functionally symmetrical. A modest preference for TFIIIB binding in the natural direction of the U6 promoter is instead dictated by flanking DNA. Because the assembly of TFIIIB on the yeast U6 gene in vivo occurs via a TFIIIC-dependent mechanism, we investigated the influence of TFIIIC on the binding polarity of TFIIIB. TFIIIC places TFIIIB on the promoter in one direction only; thus, it is TFIIIC that primarily specifies the direction of transcription.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Biol 3301 Genetics Exam #2A October 26, 2004
    Biol 3301 Genetics Exam #2A October 26, 2004 This exam consists of 40 multiple choice questions worth 2.5 points each, for a total of 100 points. Good luck. Name____________________________________ SS#_____________________________________ 1. Which of the following statements is false: Answer: e a) SWI-SNF activates transcription by moving nucleosomes from the promoter. b) HAT acetylates histones to activate transcription. c) HATs and HDACs modify the acetylation of lysines residues. d) HDAC reverses transcriptional activation due to HATs e) Lowering the amount of histones also lowers gene transcription 2. Methylation of _______________ decreases gene transcription, and is the basis of imprinting. Answer: b a) adenine b) cytosine c) guanine d) thymine e) uracil 3. Which of the following transcription factors enhance transcription without binding to DNA? Answer: a a) Coactivator b) Architectural c) TFIID d) Pol II e) Zinc finger proteins 4. A transcription factor binds to the sequence TAAGCTAAGCCCTTG and inhibits transcription. What functional domains must this protein contain? (Note: no other transcription factor can bind this sequence) a) Dimerization, DNA binding and activation. Answer: b b) Repression and DNA binding. c) Repression, dimerization and DNA binding. d) DNA binding and activation. e) DNA binding. 5. Which cis sequence can function within an intron to regulate transcription? Answer: c a) CCAAT box b) TATA box c) enhancer d) GC-rich box e) Shine-Dalgarno sequence 6. The arabinose operon can only be expressed under the following conditions: Answer: b a) High levels of glucose, low levels of cAMP, low levels of arabinose. b) Low levels of glucose, high levels of cAMP, high levels of arabinose.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of TATA Box-Binding Protein/Zinc Finger Fusions For
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 94, pp. 3616–3620, April 1997 Biochemistry Design of TATA box-binding proteinyzinc finger fusions for targeted regulation of gene expression JIN-SOO KIM*†,JAESANG KIM*‡,KARYN L. CEPEK*‡,PHILLIP A. SHARP*‡, AND CARL O. PABO*† *Department of Biology, †Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and ‡Center for Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 Communicated by Robert T. Sauer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, February 5, 1997 (received for review November 1, 1996) ABSTRACT Fusing the TATA box-binding protein (TBP) TBP (yTBP). This fusion protein, designated TBPyZF, has to other DNA-binding domains may provide a powerful way of been used as a prototype for exploring how zinc fingers can targeting TBP to particular promoters. To explore this pos- target TBP to particular promoters and thus give site-specific sibility, a structure-based design strategy was used to con- regulation of gene expression. struct a fusion protein, TBPyZF, in which the three zinc fingers of Zif268 were linked to the COOH terminus of yeast MATERIALS AND METHODS TBP. Gel shift experiments revealed that this fusion protein formed an extraordinarily stable complex when bound to the Protein Production and Purification. A DNA fragment appropriate composite DNA site (half-life up to 630 h). In vitro encoding TBPyZF was generated by PCR and cloned in transcription experiments and transient cotransfection as- pET11a (Novagen). yTBP and TBPyZF were produced as says revealed that TBPyZF could act as a site-specific repres- fusion proteins with HiszTag and purified by metal chelation sor. Because the DNA-binding specificities of zinc finger affinity chromatography (Novagen).
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Regulation in Eukaryotes
    Gene Regulation in Eukaryotes • All cells in an organism contain all the DNA: – all genetic info • Must regulate or control which genes are turned on in which cells • Genes turned on determine cells’ function – E.g.) liver cells express genes for liver enzymes but not genes for stomach enzymes 1 Proteins act in trans DNA sites act only in cis • Trans acting elements (not DNA) can diffuse through cytoplasm and act at target DNA sites on any DNA molecule in cell (usually proteins) • Cis acting elements (DNA sequences) can only influence expression of adjacent genes on same DNA molecule 2/27 Eukaryotic Promoters trans-acting proteins control transcription from class II (RNA pol II) promoters • Basal factors bind to the core promoter – TBP – TATA box binding protein – TAF – TBP associated factors • RNA polymerase II binds to basal factors 3 Fig. 17.4 a Eukaryotic Promoters • Promoter proximal elements are required for high levels of transcription. • They are further upstream from the start site, usually at positions between -50 and -500. • These elements generally function in either orientation. • Examples include: – The CAAT box consensus sequence CCAAT – The GC box consensus sequence GGGCGG – Octamer consensus sequence AGCTAAAT 4 Regulatory elements that map near a gene are cis-acting DNA sequences Core • cis-acting elements – Core Promoter – Basal level expression • Binding site for TATA-binding protein and associated factors – Promoter Proximal Elements - True level of expression • Binding sites for transcription factors 5 Eukaryotic Promoter Elements • Various combinations of core and proximal elements are found near different genes. • Promoter proximal elements are key to gene expression.
    [Show full text]
  • TATA Box-Binding Protein (TBP)-Related Factor 2 (TRF2), a Third Member of the TBP Family
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 96, pp. 4791–4796, April 1999 Biochemistry TATA box-binding protein (TBP)-related factor 2 (TRF2), a third member of the TBP family MARK D. RABENSTEIN*, SHARLEEN ZHOU*, JOHN T. LIS†, AND ROBERT TJIAN*‡ *Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3204; and †Section of Biochemistry, Molecular and Cell Biology, Biotechnology Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2801 Contributed by Robert Tjian, February 26, 1999 ABSTRACT The TATA box-binding protein (TBP) is an TAF complexes (6), consistent with the notion of specificity essential component of the RNA polymerase II transcription within the preinitiation complex. In addition to variations in apparatus in eukaryotic cells. Until recently, it was thought the basal machinery, it has become evident that there are that the general transcriptional machinery was largely invari- multiple coregulators with many subunits in common (7–9), ant and relied on a single TBP, whereas a large and diverse leading to the hypothesis of regulation by mixing and matching collection of activators and repressors were primarily respon- subunits into multiple coregulating complexes. sible for imparting specificity to transcription initiation. As further evidence of gene selectivity by the general However, it now appears that the ‘‘basal’’ transcriptional transcription apparatus, it was found that Drosophila TBP- machinery also contributes to specificity via tissue-specific related factor (TRF, now called TRF1), which was originally versions of TBP-associated factors as well as a tissue-specific thought to be an enhancer binding factor (10), most likely TBP-related factor (TRF1) responsible for gene selectivity in functions as a cell type-specific or gene-selective TBP (11).
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering 1
    FAO Glossary of RESEARCH AND biotechnology TECHNOLOGY and PAPER genetic engineering 7 A. Zaid H.G. Hughes E. Porceddu F. Nicholas Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, 1999 – ii – The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations or the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ISBN: 92-5-104369-8 ISSN: 1020-0541 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Information Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. © FAO 1999 – iii – PREFACE Biotechnology is a general term used about a very broad field of study. According to the Convention on Biological Diversity, biotechnology means: “any technological application that uses biological systems, living organisms, or derivatives thereof, to make or modify products or processes for specific use.” Interpreted in this broad sense, the definition covers many of the tools and techniques that are commonplace today in agriculture and food production. If interpreted in a narrow sense to consider only the “new” DNA, molecular biology and reproductive technology, the definition covers a range of different technologies, including gene manipulation, gene transfer, DNA typing and cloning of mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Preinitiation Complex by a Viral Transcriptional Repressor
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 2570-2575, March 1996 Biochemistry Inhibition of the association of RNA polymerase II with the preinitiation complex by a viral transcriptional repressor (transcription/repression/immediate early protein 2/human cytomegalovirus) GARY LEE*, JUN WUtt, PERCY Luu*, PETER GHAZALt, AND OSVALDO FLORES*§ *Tularik Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080; and tDepartments of Immunology and Neuropharmacology, Division of Virology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037 Communicated by Robert Tjian, University of California, Berkeley, CA, October 17, 1995 ABSTRACT Transcriptional repression is an important start site of the HCMV MIEP (7-9). More recently, it was component of regulatory networks that govern gene expres- shown that purified IE2 protein binds directly to the crs sion. In this report, we have characterized the mechanisms by element (10, 11) and represses transcription of the HCMV which the immediate early protein 2 (IE2 or IE86), a master MIEP in vitro (12, 13). In this work, we have employed a transcriptional regulator of human cytomegalovirus, down- purified in vitro transcription system to study the precise regulates its own expression. In vitro transcription and DNA mechanism by which IE2 represses transcription. Our obser- binding experiments demonstrate that IE2 blocks specifically vations show that IE2 does not impede promoter recognition the association of RNA polymerase II with the preinitiation by TFIID, yet very effectively blocks recruitment of RNA complex. Although, to our knowledge, this is the first report polymerase II. to describe a eukaryotic transcriptional repressor that selec- tively impedes RNA polymerase II recruitment, we present MATERIALS AND METHODS data that suggests that this type ofrepression might be widely used in the control of transcription by RNA polymerase II.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Promoter-Specific Gene Regulation: TATA Box Selectivity and Initiator- Dependent Bi-Directionality of Serum Response Factor-Activated Transcription
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1859 (2016) 553–563 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Biochimica et Biophysica Acta journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/bbagrm Core promoter-specific gene regulation: TATA box selectivity and Initiator-dependent bi-directionality of serum response factor-activated transcription Muyu Xu a,1, Elsie Gonzalez-Hurtado a,b,2,ErnestMartineza,b,⁎ a Department of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA b MARC U-STAR Program, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA article info abstract Article history: Gene-specific activation by enhancers involves their communication with the basal RNA polymerase II transcrip- Received 27 November 2015 tion machinery at the core promoter. Core promoters are diverse and may contain a variety of sequence elements Received in revised form 31 December 2015 such as the TATA box, the Initiator (INR), and the downstream promoter element (DPE) recognized, respectively, Accepted 23 January 2016 by the TATA-binding protein (TBP) and TBP-associated factors of the TFIID complex. Core promoter elements Available online 26 January 2016 contribute to the gene selectivity of enhancers, and INR/DPE-specific enhancers and activators have been identi- fi β Keywords: ed. Here, we identify a TATA box-selective activating sequence upstream of the human -actin (ACTB) gene that Gene regulation mediates serum response factor (SRF)-induced transcription from TATA-dependent but not INR-dependent pro- Core promoter-selective transcription activation moters and requires the TATA-binding/bending activity of TBP, which is otherwise dispensable for transcription RNA polymerase II from a TATA-less promoter. The SRF-dependent ACTB sequence is stereospecific on TATA promoters but activates TATA box in an orientation-independent manner a composite TATA/INR-containing promoter.
    [Show full text]