Once Upon a Time a Historian Named Antony Beevor, Bemused by a Diary, Novel and Telegram, Built an Ingenious Labyrinth of Speculation About the Evacuation of Crete

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Once Upon a Time a Historian Named Antony Beevor, Bemused by a Diary, Novel and Telegram, Built an Ingenious Labyrinth of Speculation About the Evacuation of Crete CHAPTER 5 CRETAN LABYRINTH: THE WAY OUT Once upon a time a historian named Antony Beevor, bemused by a diary, novel and telegram, built an ingenious labyrinth of speculation about the evacuation of Crete. Outdoing Theseus, he pursued not one, but two, Minotaurs, Colonel Robert Laycock and Captain Evelyn Waugh. But he became lost in the maze of his own creation. Literary scholars, dazzled by the clever historian, followed him deep into the labyrinth in pursuit of the mythic monsters and became even more lost than the Master. And all the while, sadly ignored, Ariadne’s little string of plain fact was there to lead them out into the light of common day. Matters for judgement In May 1941 Colonel (and Brigade Commander) Robert Laycock was Officer Commanding Layforce, a Brigade made up of a headquarters and four Commandos (also called “A”, “B”, “C”, and “D” Battalions), then stationed in Egypt. When German airborne troops invaded Crete, Layforce Headquarters and “A” and “D” Battalions were sent to assist. But the battle had been lost before the Commandos arrived, and the Allied armies in the north-west of the island were in retreat towards the south coast, where they hoped to be evacuated. On landing at Suda Bay, Layforce was ordered to provide a rearguard for the retiring troops. In collaboration with larger Australian and New Zealand units, Layforce carried out its task well. The troops, who were retreating away from their base and their only supplies of food, water, and ammunition, were arduously making for Sphakia, a small fishing village forty miles distant across the rugged mountain range that divides Crete. From there they hoped to be evacuated by the Royal Navy, but overwhelming German air superiority and the heavy losses of ships already incurred meant that the Navy could come on only four nights, and then only between 11.30 p.m. and 3.00 a.m. Clearly not all 174 In the Picture of the 20,000-odd British and Commonwealth troops on Crete could be taken off, let alone their Greek and Cretan allies. Painful choices had to be made as to who could go and in what order. The main priorities were wounded, staff at Brigade level and above, and “fighting forces”, that is, British and Commonwealth Infantry still organized to fight. Layforce, a scheduled “fighting force”, was ordered to act as the final rearguard on the last night of the evacuation, Saturday 31 July / Sunday 1 June. After shielding the withdrawal of its fellow rearguard units, it would itself disengage after receiving a message from Creforce staff, then embark. But, unknown to the officers remaining on the island, every member of Creforce staff flew off in a Sunderland at 11.50 p.m. without having sent the message to Layforce or having appointed replacements who might do so. By midnight on that final night, 1500 men of 5 NZ Brigade, the largest rearguard unit, had already embarked and 2/8 Australian Battalion was loading; 2/7 Australian Battalion and the Royal Marine battalion were on the path directly leading to the Sphakia beach. Laycock, knowing that time was running out for his men, had been desperately searching for a staff officer who could authorize the withdrawal of Layforce, then forming a wide perimeter around Sphakia. In the event, he ordered his men to withdraw to Sphakia without having received that message. Around midnight, with three hours of the evacuation still to run, the New Zealand cordons that had successfully protected the beach and enabled half the rearguard to embark, withdrew. Chaos followed. Aggressive, panic-stricken stragglers prevented the Australian and Royal Marine rearguard battalions, then on the path to the beach, from reaching it until the evacuation was ending. Most failed to board. However, Commandos who had been positioned to the west of Sphakia ran onto the beach from that direction and 120 of them found a place on the last landing craft, then on the point of departure. The Commandos had lower priority than the Australian and Marine rearguard troops who were left behind. And a final point, on the afternoon of 31 May, the last day of the campaign, before news arrived that the number to be picked up that night had been doubled, and when there was no possibility of Layforce leaving, General Weston asked Colonel Laycock to conduct the surrender next morning. Laycock refused and nominated in his place Lt Colonel Colvin, who had suffered shell shock. .
Recommended publications
  • EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER and STUDIES Volume 27, Number 3 Winter 1993
    EVELYN WAUGH NEWSLETTER AND STUDIES Volume 27, Number 3 Winter 1993 BARD IA MARTIN STANNARD'S MILITARY MUDDLE By Donat Gallagher (James Cook University, Australia) When reading Martin Stannard's No Abiding City [entitled Evelyn Waugh, The Later Years in the USA], for review, I was struck by what seemed an exceptionally large number of factual errors, unsupported claims, imputations of motive, overstatements and misreadings. The inaccuracy seemed so pervasive as to undermine the book's value as a work of record. In order to test this impression, I decided to examine a short neutral passage that would serve as a fair sample. The passage chosen for scrutiny had to be brief, and about an easily researched subject. The subject also had to be incapable of having stirred the prejudices of the biographer or the reviewer, or of awakening those of the readers of the book or review. Pages 28-31 of No Abiding City were selected because they dealt with a very minor military operation, viz. a Commando raid on Bardia, and with a humdrum article Waugh wrote about it. No issue of class, religion, politics, literary theory or internal military squabbling arises. Nor does the spectre of professional rivalry, for no one, I imagine, seeks the bubble reputation in a war of words about Bardia. The three pages narrate the events of the raid, using information drawn from Waugh's article and diaries. In addition, criticisms are made of Waugh on the basis of real and purported discrepancies between the article and the diaries. Little is said about the genesis of the article or about the administrative difficulties attending its publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Special Forces.Indd
    www.kcl.ac.uk/lhcma a WORLD WAR WORLDTWO WAR Research Guide Swww.kcl.ac.uk/lhcm pecial Forces Liddell Hart Centre for Military Archives www.kcl.ac.uk/lhcma a EVANS, Maj P H (1913-1994) LAYCOCK, Maj Gen Sir Robert (1907-1968) Trained with Special Operations Executive (SOE) Commanded Special Service Brigade, ‘Layforce’, in Palestine and Egypt, 1943; served with SOE 1941, and Middle East Commando, 1941-194; Special Forces Force 133, Greece, 1943-1944 commanded Special Service Brigade, UK, Diaries, 1943-1944, detailing SOE training, 1942-1943, for the organisation and training of service as instructor, Allied Military Mission Commandos; Chief of Combined Operations, WORLD WAR TWO This guide offers brief descriptions of material held in the Liddell Commando School, Pendalophos, British 1943-1947 Hart Centre for Military Archives relating to the role of Special relations with Greek partisans, and SOE Completed application forms for volunteer Forces in World War Two. Further biographical information about harassment and demolition activity in Greece; Commando officers [1940]; papers on reports,www.kcl.ac.uk/lhcm 1944, on reconnaissance missions in Commando training, 1940-1941; notes and each of the individuals named and complete summary descriptions the Vitsi area, West Macedonia, Greece, and memoranda on Commando operations, on Operation NOAH’S ARK, Allied and Greek 1941-1942; papers on Operation BLAZING and of the papers held here may be consulted on the Centre’s website resistance missions during the German Operation AIMWELL, for raids on Alderney, (see contact details on the back page), where information about withdrawal from Greece; correspondence 1942; notes on the planning of Operation between Evans and other Allied officers, West CORKSCREW for the capture of Pantelleria, the location of the Centre, opening hours and how to gain access Macedonia, Greece, 1944; captured German Linosa and Lampedusa Islands, Mediterranean, may also be found.
    [Show full text]
  • A Military Engima: the Canadian Air Service Company, 1948-1949
    Canadian Military History Volume 10 Issue 1 Article 3 2001 A Military Engima: The Canadian Air Service Company, 1948-1949 Bernd Horn Royal Military College of Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Horn, Bernd "A Military Engima: The Canadian Air Service Company, 1948-1949." Canadian Military History 10, 1 (2001) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Horn: A Military Engima A Military Enigma The Canadian Special Air Service Company, 1948-1949 Bernd Horn he Canadian Special Air Service (SAS) of all arms of the service. Second, it was to T Company is truly a military enigma. Very few provide a small but highly trained and skilled people are aware of its short-lived existence. professional force which, in time of conflict, could Those who are normally have a misunder­ expand and train citizen soldiers who would fight standing of its origins and role, a misconception that war. 1 Within this framework paratroopers largely reinforced by the sparse and largely had limited relevance. Not surprisingly, few inaccurate material that has been written on the showed concern for the potential loss of Canada's subject. For example, most believe that it was hard-earned airborne experience. raised specifically to provide a commando capability within the Canadian Army immediately In the austere postwar climate of"minimum after the Second World War.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Duration: Global War and Satire in England and the United States
    FOR THE DURATION: GLOBAL WAR AND SATIRE IN ENGLAND AND THE UNITED STATES by Elizabeth Steedley A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland February 2015 ABSTRACT “For the Duration” moves to unsettle some regnant assumptions about the ways in which historical experience shaped the formal choices and political investments of modernist writers. While recent critical work has focused on the influence of the Great War either on non-combatant authors or on minor memoirists and poets of the trenches, little attention has been given to the war’s effect on modernist authors who saw combat and thereafter crafted narratives distinguished by their satirical innovation. In the first three chapters of this dissertation, I concentrate on works by Ford Madox Ford, Wyndham Lewis, and Evelyn Waugh to suggest that these soldier-authors’ experience of temporal duration in war led them not, as one might expect, to emphasize Bergsonian durée in the novelistic presentation of experience but rather to reject it. Concerned that Bergsonism and its literary offshoots offered no foothold for critical engagement with post- war reality, these writers dwelt on the importance of clock-time, causality, and material reality in providing a grounding for historical responsibility; moreover, they strove to exploit the political potential of satire, a genre that has a peculiarly temporal character. Satire was especially attractive to these writers, I argue, not only because they saw in the interwar world a dispiriting unconcern with the causes and consequences of World War I but also because the genre’s dependence on barbed, multi-front attacks mimicked a key feature of modern combat.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Operations in the Battle of Crete
    I.R. 1736(2) RESTRICTED NAVAL STAFF HISTORY SECOND WORLD WAR NAVAL OPERATIONS IN THE BATTLE OF CRETE 20th May—1st June 1941 (Battle Summary No. 4) This book is the property of Her Majesty’* Government and is intended for the use o f persons in Her Majesty’s Service only. it must not be shown or made available to the Press or to any member of the public. ICTED Attention is called, to the penalties attaching to any infraction o f the Official Secrets Acts B.R. 1736 (2) NAVAL STAFF HISTORY SECOND WORLD WAR NAVAL OPERATIONS IN THE BATTLE OF CRETE 20th May—1st June 1941 (Battle Summary No. 4) CONDITIONS OF RELEASE This information is disclosed only ior official use by the recipient Government and such of its contractors, under seal of secrecy, as may be engaged on a defence project. Disclosure to any other Government or release to the Press or disclosure in any other way would be a breach of these conditions. The information should be safeguarded under rules designed to give the same standard of security as that maintained by Her Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom. The recipient is warned that information contained in this book may be subject to privately owned rights. HISTORICAL SECTION ADMIRALTY C ontents Page A bbreviations vi Admiralty, S.W.l S ou rces vii 6th M ay 1960 F o r e w o r d viii H.S./16/57 CHAPTER I B .R .1736 (2) Naval Staff History, Second World War, Events leading up to the Battle, Battle Summary No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Engineers Journal
    ISSN 0035-8878 THE ROYAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL © Published in April, August and December by the Institution of Royal Engineers, Chatham, Kent, ME44UG Printed by Staples Printers Rochester Limited, Neptune Close, Medway City Estate, Frindsbury, Rochester, Kent, ME2 4LT Volume 108 August 1994 No2 Contents 1 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE CORPS, Engineer in Chief .... 132 2 DISASTER RELIEF IN CENTRAL NEPAL, Major J R White MBE 142 3 WELL DRILLING IN BOSNIA, Major T W Wye 149 4 SUPPLYING WATER TO THE BRITISH ARMY DURING THE GULF WAR, Captain M P W alton- Knight 154 5 A PIECE OF FORGOTTEN CORPS HISTORY, Museum Director 159 6 UNITED NATIONS OPERATION SOMALIA II, GERMAN ENGINEERS - LESSONS LEARNED Brigadegeneral A Wittenberg 160 7 51 (AIRFIELDS) SQUADRON AIRFIELD REVISITED, KUALA PENARIK 1967-1993, Lieut Colonel J S Farmbrough 166 8 EXCAVATION OF A 2200 TONNE GoLD DREDGE FROM FROZEN GROUND, Major G B 0 R Jones 168 9 16 ASSAULT SQUADRON JUNE-OcTOBER 1944, Major General J C Woollett CBE MC .176 10 AMAZON BRIDGE, Colonel A P Daniell 179 11 INFANTRY FIRST? A POSSIBLE SOLUTION, Lieutenant I E S Nichols 186 12 BING FORCE, Colonel I T C Wilson MBE MC .188 13 REMINISCENCES OF DAYS WITH THE ROYAL BOMBAY SAPPERS AND MINERS, Brigadier J R G Finch OBE 194 14 COAST DEFENCES: SOME EXPERIENCES IN PEACE AND WAR, Brigadier M W Biggs CBE .201 15 "THESE DUTIES MAYBE CONSIDERED AS BEING SIMILAR To THOSE OF A FIRE BRIGADE" Major J D Beaumont .209 16 Two Days by the Upper Tiber, Captain E Lightfoot 216 17 TOWARDS GREATER STABILITY IN EUROPE: REDUCTION OF ARMAMENTS UNDER THE TERMS OF THE CONVENTIONAL ARMED FORCES IN EUROPE TREATY, Captain D G Bowyer.
    [Show full text]
  • Force Headquarters, Creforce]
    9 September 2020 [FORCE HEADQUARTERS, CREFORCE] Force Headquarters Creforce (1) Force Headquarters, Creforce Infantry 1st Bn. The Welch Regiment (2) 9th Bn. The King’s Royal Rifle Corps (The Rangers) (3) 2nd/2nd Australian Field Regiment (4) Detachment, 2nd/3rd Australian Field Regiment (4) 16th Australian Infantry Brigade Composite Battalion (4) 17th Australian Infantry Brigade Composite Battalion (4) 11th Searchlight Regiment, Royal Artillery (5) ‘S’ Searchlight Regiment, Royal Marines (5) ‘Royal Perivolians’ (5) 1st Echelon, New Zealand Divisional Supply Column (5) 2 Greek Regiment (6) Artillery Commander Royal Artillery 102nd (Northumberland Hussars) Anti-Tank Regiment, Royal Artillery (7) 106th (Lancashire Hussars) Regiment, Royal Horse Artillery (8) Royal Engineers (9) Chief Engineer, Creforce 42nd Field Company, Royal Engineers Crete Composite Company, R.E. 1003 Docks Operation Company, Royal Engineers Royal Engineers Stores Depot Details, Australian Engineers and Australian Army Service Corps Stevedores Details, New Zealand Engineers Stevedores Royal Corps of Signals Creforce Signals, Royal Corps of Signals ©www.BritishMilitaryHistory.co.uk Page 1 9 September 2020 [FORCE HEADQUARTERS, CREFORCE] Royal Army Service Corps (10) Assistant Director Supplies and Transport 231st Motor Transport Company, Royal Army Service Corps 101st Petrol Company, Royal Army Service Corps 1st Petrol Depot, Royal Army Service Corps Two Supply Depots Base Supply Depot 37th Detail Issue Depot, Royal Army Service Corps Detachments, 1st and 26th Field Bakeries,
    [Show full text]
  • RETREAT and EMBARKATION Y the Morning of 28Th May the Force at Suda Had Disengaged and Wa S Already Distributed Along the Road W
    CHAPTER 14 RETREAT AND EMBARKATIO N Y the morning of 28th May the force at Suda had disengaged and wa s already distributed along the road which climbed over the island t o StakiaB . That road wound up and across Crete's backbone, reaching a height of 3,000 feet. Some seven miles from Sfakia it passed through th e upland plain of Askifou, a basin about one mile in width and two in length . Farther on, the road ended a mile and a half from the little beach at Sfakia, and thence only foot tracks led down to the sea. The task of General Freyberg's fighting troops was to hold a series of rearguard positions astride this mountain road, along which a densely-packed column was no w retreating, and finally to disengage and embark. In the morning of the 28th General Freyberg, whose headquarters wer e now established in the Askifou plain, sent General Weston an order placing all troops in the western sector of Crete under his command. Freyberg informed Weston that 1,000 men were to be embarked that night, 6,000 o n the 29th-30th, 3,000 on the 30th-31st, 3,000 on the 31st-1st ; the 4th Brigade was to hold a position at the northern entrance to the plain of Askifou until darkness fell on the 29th ; an improvised Marine battalion to hold a position south of the plain until darkness on the 31st—the nigh t on which the 5th and 19th Brigades were to embark . Next day the marines and Layforce were to form a final rearguard.
    [Show full text]
  • Layforce 1941
    Jiggered about Beyond Belief Layforce 1941 In Memory of 2819656 John Orton Seaforth Highlanders Haifa, June 1941 Alan Orton with Mike Beckett Contents Preface 3 Introduction 4 Maps · Map 1: Central and Eastern Mediterranean Theatre of War 5 · Map 2: The Advance of Axis Forces under General (later Field Marshal) 6 Erwin Rommel – April 1941 · Map 3: Southern Greece and the Island of Crete 7 · Map 4: The Allied Evacuation of Crete – Withdrawal to Sphakia 8 · Map 5: The Tobruk Perimeter – April to June 1941 9 · Map 6: South­Western Syria – Mid 1941 10 Layforce 1941 11 No.7 Commando (and Nos. 50-52 Commando) 11 · 50­52 Middle East Commandos 16 · No.7 Commando and Nos 50­52 Commandos in Crete 18 No.8 (Guards) Commando 23 No.11 (Scottish) Commando 28 Bibliography and Sources 38 Preface These pages are dedicated to the memory of my father 2819656, Private John Orton of the Seaforth Highlanders. During the Second World War John was one of those extraordinary ‘Volunteers for Special Service of a Hazardous Nature’ who formed our early Commando units. He served with No.11 (Scottish) Commando, from formation in June 1940, until disbandment. On the 28th August 1941 John became an ‘Original’ member of ‘L’ Detachment Special Air Service Regiment – but that is another story. There is comparatively little official information available concerning the activities of No.11 (Scottish) Commando during the Second World War. This is also true of the other units of Layforce, with whom No.11 (Scottish) Commando served in the Middle East. War Diaries can be found in the Public Record Office at Kew, though they are not as extensive as those of other Commando units.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette of FRIDAY, the 2Ist of MAY, 1948 By
    IRumb. 38296 3103 SUPPLEMENT TO The London Gazette Of FRIDAY, the 2ist of MAY, 1948 by Registered as a newspaper •MONDAY, 24 MAY, 1948 THE BATTLE OF CRETE The following Despatch was submitted to the So, without air support of any sort, the fleet Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty on had to be exposed to a scale of air attack which 4th August, 1941, by Admiral Sir Andrew B. is believed to have exceeded anything of the Cunningham, G.C.B., D.S.O., Cymmander- kind yet experienced afloat.* > in-Chief, Mediterranean. 4. The air attack on Crete started on the 2oth May, 1941. The sweeps of the Light Forces on Mediterranean, the night 20th/2ist and during daylight 2ist were uneventful except for heavy air attacks qth August, 1941. and the unlucky loss of H.M.S. JUNO (see paragraphs 14 to 20). f As far as the Navy was Be pleased to lay before Their Lordships, concerned, the real Battle of Crete began on the attached reports of naval operations in the night of 2ist/22nd May, with the success- defence of Crete between I5th May and 27th ful encounter of Force D with an enemy convoy May, 1941. Reports on the evacuation of troops (see paragraph 23). This encounter was. skil- from Crete will be forwarded later. fully and thoroughly exploited, was a heavy 2. The object of the operations was the pre- blow to the Germans and an encouragement for vention of enemy seaborne landings on the our hard pressed troops in Crete. coast of Crete.' It was known that airborne * Footnote : Air Ministry comment: The R.A.F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conventional Military / Sof Chasm
    SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES SPECIAL OPERATIONS US Army Photo 031209-A-3996M-042 US A patrol from the US 3rd Special Forces Group moving through a river bed, Afghanistan, December 2003. WHEN CULTURES COLLIDE: THE CONVENTIONAL MILITARY / SOF CHASM by Colonel Bernd Horn he ultimate legitimacy of Special Operations military. If they fail do so, they risk again becoming Forces (SOF) became evident in the aftermath constrained and marginalized at a time when they are of the terrorist attacks in the United States needed most. on 11 September 2001. The immediate reliance on SOF by political and military WHO ARE THESE SHADOW WARRIORS? Tdecision-makers to strike back at those responsible for the unprecedented attack signalled that SOF had pecial operations forces are generally defined by completed the transformation from a force of desperation Sjournalists as “the toughest, smartest, most secretive, to the force of choice. The road to that point had been fittest, best-equipped and consistently lethal killers a difficult one. Throughout their relatively short history, in the U.S. [or any other] military.”1 However, a more there have been constant themes – the competition for traditional definition, spawned from the SOF’s Second scarce resources, unorthodox concepts of discipline World War beginnings, describes them as forces that are and accountability, as well as divergent cultural and “specially selected, specially trained, specially equipped, philosophical methodologies of operation – that have and given special missions and support.”2 But this always been associated with the debate on special somewhat simplistic description has been eclipsed by operations forces. a more comprehensive and nuanced explanation that better captures their shadowy role in the international Ironically, the unique attributes and characteristics of security environment.
    [Show full text]
  • DAK: Deutsches Afrika Korps, Vol
    The Gamers, Inc. Operational Combat Series: DAK: Deutsches Afrika Korps, Vol. I ©1997. The Gamers, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Table of Contents: Playtesting, Proofing, and so on: Perry Andrus, John Best, Jim Daniels, Dean Essig, Introduction Volume I DAK is a simulation covering the General Rules, pgs 1-12 Keith Fortner, Owen Fuller, Simon Hoare, Axis Special Rules, pgs 12-14 Scott Johnstone, Warren Kingsley, Rod entire campaign in the Western Desert Allied Special Rules, pgs 14-17 Miller, Dave Powell, Nigel Roberts, Rick theater in World War II. It covers all the General Options, pgs 17-18 “First to Lose Rommel” Robinson, Bob actions in Eastern Libya/Western Egypt Axis Options, pgs 19-20 from September 1940 through November Allied Options, pgs 20-21 Runnicles 1942. Units which participated in this Scenarios: campaign are shown in great detail from Research Assistance: Perry Andrus, Marco • Compass Training Scenario (7.1), pgs 21-23 division down to battalion level (with • Small Italian Offensive (7.2), pgs 23-24 Battarelli, Dirk Blennemann, Ulrich occasional company-sized formations). The • Sidi Barrani Tr’ng Scenario (7.3), pgs 24-26 Blennemann, Joseph Vanden Borre, Vance • Compass Campaign Start (7.4), pgs 26-28 maps, drawn at the scale of 5 miles to the von Borries, James Broshot, Frank • March 41 Campaign Start (7.5), pgs 28-30 hex, are a compilation of numerous sources Chadwick, Marco Ferrari, Dave Freidrichs, • Brevity Small Scenario (7.6), pgs 30-31 including Italian Official records and • Brevity Campaign Start (7.7), pgs 31-34 Owen Fuller, Andrea Galliano, Jack German wartime military maps.
    [Show full text]