Studies on Language Change. Working Papers in Linguistics No. 34

170

Copy Link

Recommended publications

AN EXPERIENCE of TRANSLATING NEPALI GRAMMAR INTO ENGLISH Govinda Raj Bhattarai and Bal Ram Adhikari [email protected]; [email protected]

AN EXPERIENCE OF TRANSLATING NEPALI GRAMMAR INTO ENGLISH Govinda Raj Bhattarai and Bal Ram Adhikari [email protected]; [email protected] 1. Introduction Translating a grammar from one language to another sounds impossible because two languages differ basically in terms of grammar which stands for different components from sound to discourse units. Despite this fact, the world has translated grammar between languages, as it is the most authentic door to enter into another language, its structure, form and function. Greek grammars were translated into Latin and it is from Latin that many western grammars have been reshaped, some in translation, some in adaptation and others in considerable degree of borrowing as well. The grammars of all young languages undergo such a process in course of evolution. This applies to Nepali as well. Pande's Chandrika Gorkha Bhasa Vyakaran (1912) and Sharma's Madhya Chandrika (1919) (quoted in Schmidt and Dahal 1993: x) are some seminal works in Nepali grammar. These works in their attempt to codify and describe the Nepali language adopted the model of Sanskrit grammar. The modern Nepali grammar has evolved through a long and exacting process. Whitney's Sanskrit Grammar (1879) is a best example of translation of classical grammar into contemporary languages. There have been some efforts made in Nepali too. Some works like Ayton (1820), Turnbull (1888) Kilgour and Duncan (1922), Turner (1931), Clark (1963) and Matthews (1984) border between translation and restructuring. Many other foreign scholars have contributed towards writing Nepali grammar till date. They have laid the foundation stone of Nepali grammar in English.
VALTS ERNÇSTREITS (Riga) LIVONIAN ORTHOGRAPHY Introduction the Livonian Language Has Been Extensively Written for About

Linguistica Uralica XLIII 2007 1 VALTS ERNÇSTREITS (Riga) LIVONIAN ORTHOGRAPHY Abstract. This article deals with the development of Livonian written language and the related matters starting from the publication of first Livonian books until present day. In total four different spelling systems have been used in Livonian publications. The first books in Livonian appeared in 1863 using phonetic transcription. In 1880, the Gospel of Matthew was published in Eastern and Western Livonian dialects and used Gothic script and a spelling system similar to old Latvian orthography. In 1920, an East Livonian written standard was established by the simplification of the Finno-Ugric phonetic transcription. Later, elements of Latvian orthography, and after 1931 also West Livonian characteristics, were added. Starting from the 1970s and due to a considerable decrease in the number of Livonian mother tongue speakers in the second half of the 20th century the orthography was modified to be even more phonetic in the interest of those who did not speak the language. Additionally, in the 1930s, a spelling system which was better suited for conveying certain phonetic phenomena than the usual standard was used in two books but did not find any wider usage. Keywords: Livonian, standard language, orthography. Introduction The Livonian language has been extensively written for about 150 years by linguists who have been noting down examples of the language as well as the Livonians themselves when publishing different materials. The prime consideration for both of these groups has been how to best represent the Livonian language in the written form. The area of interest for the linguists has been the written representation of the language with maximal phonetic precision.
Minimalist C/Case Sigurðsson, Halldor Armann

Minimalist C/case Sigurðsson, Halldor Armann Published in: Linguistic Inquiry 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Sigurðsson, H. A. (2012). Minimalist C/case. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(2), 191-227. http://ling.auf.net/lingBuzz/000967 Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 Access Provided by Lunds universitet at 04/30/12 3:55PM GMT Minimalist C/case Halldo´rA´ rmann SigurLsson This article discusses A-licensing and case from a minimalist perspec- tive, pursuing the idea that argument NPs cyclically enter a number of A-relations, rather than just a single one, resulting in event licensing, case licensing, and ␾-licensing.
Latviešu-Lībiešu-Angļu Sarunvārdnīca Leţkīel-Līvõkīel-Engliškīel Rõksõnārōntõz Latvian-Livonian-English Phrase Book

Valda Šuvcāne Ieva Ernštreite Latviešu-lībiešu-angļu sarunvārdnīca Leţkīel-līvõkīel-engliškīel rõksõnārōntõz Latvian-Livonian-English Phrase Book © Valda Šuvcāne 1999 © Ieva Ernštreite 1999 © Eraksti 2005 ISBN-9984-771-74-1 68 lpp. / ~ 0.36 MB SATURS SIŽALI CONTENTS I. IEVADS ĪEVAD INTRODUCTION __________________________________________________________________ I.1. PRIEKŠVĀRDS 5 EĆĆISÕNĀ 6 FOREWORD 6 I.2. LĪBIEŠI, VIŅU VALODA UN RAKSTĪBA 7 LĪVLIST, NÄNT KĒĻ JA KĒRAVĪŢ LIVONIANS, THEIR LANGUAGE AND ORTOGRAPHY 12 I.3. NELIELS IESKATS LĪBIEŠU VALODAS GRAMATIKĀ 9 LĪTÕ IĻ LĪVÕ GRAMĀTIK EXPLANATORY NOTES ON THE MAIN FEATURES OF THE LIVONIAN SPELLING AND PRONUNCIATION 14 _____________________________________________________________________________ II. BIEŽĀK LIETOTĀS FRĀZES SAGGÕLD KȬLBATÕT FRĀZÕD COMMON USED PHRASES __________________________________________________________________ II.1. SASVEICINĀŠANĀS UN ATVADĪŠANĀS 16 TĒRIŅTÕMI JA JUMĀLÕKS JETĀMI GREETINGS II.2. IEPAZĪŠANĀS UN CIEMOŠANĀS 16 TUNDIMI JA KILĀSTIMI INTRODUCING PEOPLE, VISITING PEOPLE II.3. BIOGRĀFIJAS ZIŅAS 17 BIOGRĀFIJ TEUTÕD PERSON'S BIOGRAPHY II.4. PATEICĪBAS, LĪDZJŪTĪBAS UN PIEKLĀJĪBAS IZTEICIENI 18 TIENĀNDÕKST, ĪŅÕZTŪNDIMI JA ANDÕKS ĀNDAMI SÕNĀD EXPRESSING GRATITUDE, POLITE PHRASES II.5. LŪGUMS 19 PÕLAMI REQUEST II.6. APSVEIKUMI, NOVĒLĒJUMI 19 2 VȮNTARMÕMI CONGRATULATIONS, WISHES II.7. DIENAS, MĒNEŠI, GADALAIKI 20 PǞVAD, KŪD, ĀIGASTĀIGAD WEEKDAYS, MONTHS, SEASONS II.8. LAIKA APSTĀKĻI 23 ĀIGA WEATHER II.9. PULKSTENIS 24 KĪELA TIME, TELLING THE TIME _____________________________________________________________________________ III. VĀRDU KRĀJUMS SÕNA VŌLA VOCABULARY __________________________________________________________________ III.1. CILVĒKS 25 RIŠTĪNG PERSON III.2. ĢIMENE 27 AIM FAMILY III.3. MĀJOKLIS 28 KUOD HOME III.4. MĀJLIETAS, APĢĒRBS 29 KUODAŽĀD, ŌRÕND HOUSEHOLD THINGS, CLOTHING III.5. ĒDIENI, DZĒRIENI 31 SĪEMNAIGĀD, JŪOMNAIGĀD MEALS, FOOD, DRINKS III.6. JŪRA, UPE, EZERS 32 MER, JOUG, JŌRA SEA, LAKE, RIVER III.7.
VALODA: NOZĪME UN FORMA 4 Kategoriju Robežas Gramatikā

Latvijas Universitāte Humanitāro zinātņu fakultāte Latviešu un vispārīgās valodniecības katedra VALODA: NOZĪME UN FORMA 4 Kategoriju robežas gramatikā Andra Kalnača un Ilze Lokmane (krājuma sastādītājas un redaktores) LANGUAGE: MEANING AND FORM 4 Boundaries of Categories in Grammar Andra Kalnača and Ilze Lokmane (editors) LU Akadēmiskais apgāds UDK 811.174(082) Va 390 Valoda: nozīme un forma 4. Kategoriju robežas gramatikā = Language: Meaning and Form 4. Boundaries of Categories in Grammar : LU Humanitāro zinātņu fakultātes Latviešu un vispārīgās valodniecības katedras rakstu krājums; krājuma sastādītājas un redaktores Andra Kalnača un Ilze Lokmane. – Rīga : LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 2014. – 180 lpp. Rakstu krājums Valoda: nozīme un forma. 4. Kategoriju robežas gramatikā izdots ar Latvijas Universitātes Humanitāro zinātņu fakultātes Domes 2014. gada 3. marta sēdes lēmumu, protokola Nr. 9. Redaktore / Editor Andra Kalnača, Latvijas Universitātes Humanitāro zinātņu fakultāte Redaktores vietniece / Assistant Editor Ilze Lokmane, Latvijas Universitātes Humanitāro zinātņu fakultāte Redakcijas kolēģija / Editorial Board Ilze Auziņa, Latvijas Universitātes Matemātikas un informātikas institūts Juris Grigorjevs, Latvijas Universitātes Latviešu valodas institūts Magdalene Hilmane (Magdalene Huelmann), Vestfāles Vilhelma universitāte, Minstere, Vācija Karls Pajusalu (Karl Pajusalu), Tartu Universitāte, Igaunija Jurģis Pakeris (Jurgis Pakerys), Viļņas Universitāte, Lietuva Svetlana Polkovņikova, Daugavpils Universitāte Ilze Rūmniece, Latvijas Universitātes Humanitāro zinātņu fakultāte Iļja Seržants, Konstances Universitāte, Vācija; Lietuviešu valodas institūts, Viļņa, Lietuva Visi krājumā ievietotie raksti ir anonīmi recenzēti. Korektore Gita Bērziņa Maketu un vāka noformējumu veidojusi Andra Liepiņa © Latvijas Universitāte, 2014 © I. Auziņa, A. Butāne, L. Ciematniece, D. Horiguči, B. Ivulāne, A. Kalnača, K. Kibermane, I. Kuplā, T. Kuzņecova, M. Laizāns, L. Lauze, O. Lāms, I. Lokmane, M. Madisone, G. Nešpore, K. Pajusalu, B.
The Growth of Grammar in the Elven Tongues

Volume 21 Number 2 Article 28 Winter 10-15-1996 The Growth of Grammar in the Elven Tongues Christopher Gilson Patrick Wynne Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore Part of the Children's and Young Adult Literature Commons Recommended Citation Gilson, Christopher and Wynne, Patrick (1996) "The Growth of Grammar in the Elven Tongues," Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature: Vol. 21 : No. 2 , Article 28. Available at: https://dc.swosu.edu/mythlore/vol21/iss2/28 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mythopoeic Society at SWOSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mythlore: A Journal of J.R.R. Tolkien, C.S. Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature by an authorized editor of SWOSU Digital Commons. An ADA compliant document is available upon request. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To join the Mythopoeic Society go to: http://www.mythsoc.org/join.htm Mythcon 51: A VIRTUAL “HALFLING” MYTHCON July 31 - August 1, 2021 (Saturday and Sunday) http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-51.htm Mythcon 52: The Mythic, the Fantastic, and the Alien Albuquerque, New Mexico; July 29 - August 1, 2022 http://www.mythsoc.org/mythcon/mythcon-52.htm Abstract While some features of Elven grammar go back to the earliest records, such as the “Qenya Lexicon”, others are unique to later works such as the “Secret Vice” poems and the Etymologies, and some do not emerge until after The Lord of the Rings.
Strong Linearity: Three Case Studies Towards a Theory of Morphosyntactic Templatic Constructions

Strong linearity: Three case studies towards a theory of morphosyntactic templatic constructions by Jeffrey Craig Good B.A. (University of Chicago) 1998 M.A. (University of Chicago) 1998 M.A. (University of California, Berkeley) 2000 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY Committee in charge: Professor Larry Hyman, Chair Professor Andrew Garrett Professor Johanna Nichols Fall 2003 The dissertation of Jeffrey Craig Good is approved: Chair Date Date Date University of California, Berkeley Fall 2003 Strong linearity: Three case studies towards a theory of morphosyntactic templatic constructions Copyright 2003 by Jeffrey Craig Good 1 Abstract Strong linearity: Three case studies towards a theory of morphosyntactic templatic constructions by Jeffrey Craig Good Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Larry Hyman, Chair The focus of this work is on templatic constructions in morphology and syntax, and its central argument is that their form is consistent with the Strong Linearity Domain Hy- pothesis. This hypothesis states that all templatic constructions must be coextensive with some prosodic constituent and that their templatic restrictions must be consistent with the characteristic phonology of that constituent. The introductory chapter lays the groundwork for later discussion, and the primary support for the Strong Linearity Domain Hypothesis comes from three case studies. The ﬁrst of these is an examination of the ordering restrictions of three verbal extensions found on the Bantu verb stem, the “long” causative, the applicative, and the “short” causative. The second case study is on a minimal-size restriction found in the Chechen core verb phrase.
Indo-European Linguistics: an Introduction Indo-European Linguistics an Introduction

This page intentionally left blank Indo-European Linguistics The Indo-European language family comprises several hun- dred languages and dialects, including most of those spoken in Europe, and south, south-west and central Asia. Spoken by an estimated 3 billion people, it has the largest number of native speakers in the world today. This textbook provides an accessible introduction to the study of the Indo-European proto-language. It clearly sets out the methods for relating the languages to one another, presents an engaging discussion of the current debates and controversies concerning their clas- siﬁcation, and offers sample problems and suggestions for how to solve them. Complete with a comprehensive glossary, almost 100 tables in which language data and examples are clearly laid out, suggestions for further reading, discussion points and a range of exercises, this text will be an essential toolkit for all those studying historical linguistics, language typology and the Indo-European proto-language for the ﬁrst time. james clackson is Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Classics, University of Cambridge, and is Fellow and Direc- tor of Studies, Jesus College, University of Cambridge. His previous books include The Linguistic Relationship between Armenian and Greek (1994) and Indo-European Word For- mation (co-edited with Birgit Anette Olson, 2004). CAMBRIDGE TEXTBOOKS IN LINGUISTICS General editors: p. austin, j. bresnan, b. comrie, s. crain, w. dressler, c. ewen, r. lass, d. lightfoot, k. rice, i. roberts, s. romaine, n. v. smith Indo-European Linguistics An Introduction In this series: j. allwood, l.-g. anderson and o.¨ dahl Logic in Linguistics d.
Paninian Studies

The University of Michigan Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies MICHIGAN PAPERS ON SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA Ann Arbor, Michigan STUDIES Professor S. D. Joshi Felicitation Volume edited by Madhav M. Deshpande Saroja Bhate CENTER FOR SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Number 37 Open access edition funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities/ Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. Library of Congress catalog card number: 90-86276 ISBN: 0-89148-064-1 (cloth) ISBN: 0-89148-065-X (paper) Copyright © 1991 Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies The University of Michigan Printed in the United States of America ISBN 978-0-89148-064-8 (hardcover) ISBN 978-0-89148-065-5 (paper) ISBN 978-0-472-12773-3 (ebook) ISBN 978-0-472-90169-2 (open access) The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ CONTENTS Preface vii Madhav M. Deshpande Interpreting Vakyapadiya 2.486 Historically (Part 3) 1 Ashok Aklujkar Vimsati Padani . Trimsat . Catvarimsat 49 Pandit V. B. Bhagwat Vyanjana as Reflected in the Formal Structure 55 of Language Saroja Bhate On Pasya Mrgo Dhavati 65 Gopikamohan Bhattacharya Panini and the Veda Reconsidered 75 Johannes Bronkhorst On Panini, Sakalya, Vedic Dialects and Vedic 123 Exegetical Traditions George Cardona The Syntactic Role of Adhi- in the Paninian 135 Karaka-System Achyutananda Dash Panini 7.2.15 (Yasya Vibhasa): A Reconsideration 161 Madhav M. Deshpande On Identifying the Conceptual Restructuring of 177 Passive as Ergative in Indo-Aryan Peter Edwin Hook A Note on Panini 3.1.26, Varttika 8 201 Daniel H.
The Birth of Grammar in Greece 3

CHAPTE! THI!TY"TH!EE !e Birth of Grammar in Greece Andreas U. Schmidhauser Grammar as one understands it today gives an account of the system of rules govern- ing the construction of syllables, words, and sentences in a certain language. !e sci- ence thus called was independently—and very di"erently—developed at about the same time in ancient India and Greece: Sanskrit grammar is the work of Pā!ini ( !. c. $%% BC); Greek grammar is the creation of Chrysippus of Soli ( !. &$% BC). Both Pā!ini and Chrysippus not only inaugurate a new 'eld but also represent the culmi- nation of centuries of linguistic thought: what distinguishes them from their prede- cessors is that they, for the 'rst time, integrated the results obtained into one theory. !e term “grammar” itself is of Greek origin: literally, ἡ γραμματική (or in full: ἡ γραμματικὴ τέχνη) is the skill, expertise, or knowledge belonging to a person consid- ered γραμματικός; and the adjective γραμματικός is derived from the noun γράμμα [letter], which in turn derives from the verb γράφειν [write, draw]. Over time, the meaning of γραμματικός and thus also of γραμματική changed. One can distinguish four stages: i. In the fourth century BC, when γραμματικός 'rst appears, it is used to describe someone who knows the “letters”: a person versed in grammar, that is, knows how to read and write, can set apart vowels, consonants, and semiconsonants, and suchlike (e.g. Pl. Cra. $;<e; Phlb. <=d; Soph. &>;a). ii. From the third century BC, γραμματική comes to be used for what one would now call philology and criticism (e.g.
7. Pragmatics

Oxford Handbook of Computational Linguistics, 2nd edn. Drafted Apr 20, 2011; revised Mar 4, 2014 7. Pragmatics Christopher Potts Department of Linguistics, Stanford University Abstract This chapter reviews core empirical phenomena and technical concepts from linguistic pragmatics, including context dependence, common ground, indexicality, conversational implicature, presupposition, and speech acts. I seek to identify unifying themes among these concepts, provide a high-level guide to the primary literature, and relate the phenomena to issues in computational linguistics. Keywords context dependence, common ground, indexicality, conversational implica- ture, presupposition, speech acts 7.1 Introduction The linguistic objects that speakers use in their utterances vastly underdetermine the contributions that those utterances make to discourse. To borrow an analogy from Levinson(2000: 4), “an utterance is not [... ] a veridical model or ‘snapshot’ of the scene it describes”. Rather, the encoded content merely sketches what speakers intend and hearers perceive. The fundamental questions of pragmatics concern how semantic content, contextual information, and general communicative pressures interact to guide discourse participants in ﬁlling in these sketches: (i) How do language users represent the context of utterance, and which aspects of the context are central to communication? (ii) We often “mean more than we say”. What principles guide this pragmatic enrichment, and how do semantic values (conventional aspects of meaning) enable and constrain
Berkeley Linguistics Society

PROCEEDINGS OF THE FORTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE BERKELEY LINGUISTICS SOCIETY February 7-8, 2015 General Session Special Session Fieldwork Methodology Editors Anna E. Jurgensen Hannah Sande Spencer Lamoureux Kenny Baclawski Alison Zerbe Berkeley Linguistics Society Berkeley, CA, USA Berkeley Linguistics Society University of California, Berkeley Department of Linguistics 1203 Dwinelle Hall Berkeley, CA 94720-2650 USA All papers copyright c 2015 by the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 0363-2946 LCCN: 76-640143 Contents Acknowledgments . v Foreword . vii The No Blur Principle Effects as an Emergent Property of Language Systems Farrell Ackerman, Robert Malouf . 1 Intensification and sociolinguistic variation: a corpus study Andrea Beltrama . 15 Tagalog Sluicing Revisited Lena Borise . 31 Phonological Opacity in Pendau: a Local Constraint Conjunction Analysis Yan Chen . 49 Proximal Demonstratives in Predicate NPs Ryan B . Doran, Gregory Ward . 61 Syntax of generic null objects revisited Vera Dvořák . 71 Non-canonical Noun Incorporation in Bzhedug Adyghe Ksenia Ershova . 99 Perceptual distribution of merging phonemes Valerie Freeman . 121 Second Position and “Floating” Clitics in Wakhi Zuzanna Fuchs . 133 Some causative alternations in K’iche’, and a unified syntactic derivation John Gluckman . 155 The ‘Whole’ Story of Partitive Quantification Kristen A . Greer . 175 A Field Method to Describe Spontaneous Motion Events in Japanese Miyuki Ishibashi . 197 i On the Derivation of Relative Clauses in Teotitlán del Valle Zapotec Nick Kalivoda, Erik Zyman . 219 Gradability and Mimetic Verbs in Japanese: A Frame-Semantic Account Naoki Kiyama, Kimi Akita . 245 Exhaustivity, Predication and the Semantics of Movement Peter Klecha, Martina Martinović . 267 Reevaluating the Diphthong Mergers in Japono-Ryukyuan Tyler Lau .