DOCSLIB.ORG

Spotlight Europe # 2008/05 – May 2008 Green Light from the Emerald Isle? Ten Questions and Answers About Ireland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spotlight Europe # 2008/05 – May 2008 Green Light from the Emerald Isle? Ten Questions and Answers About Ireland spotlight europe # 2008/05 – May 2008 Green Light from the Emerald Isle? Ten Questions and Answers about Ireland Dominik Hierlemann Bertelsmann Stiftung, [email protected] Christian Heydecker Bertelsmann Stiftung, [email protected] On 12 June 2008 Europeans will be looking intently at Ireland, for the Irish electorate is the only one in Europe which is being permitted to vote on the Treaty of Lisbon. For a long time the referendum seemed to be a foregone conclusion. However, as the poll approaches, a “Yes” vote is be- ginning to seem more uncertain. Ten questions and answers shed some light on the current situation. I The Irish electorate was the only one in Europe which was asked to comment on How do the Irish vote on the Treaty of Nice, whereas in all of the European issues? other member states the decision lay with the national parliaments. In view of the Over the past 36 years there have been six unruffled nature of the previous referen- referendums in Ireland on crucial deci- dums, the clearly pro-European attitudes # 2008/05 sions pertaining to the European integra- of the voters, and Ireland’s positive eco- tion process. Whenever there is a funda- nomic development after 1973 in the wake mental change in the European treaties, of EC membership, the political establish- the electorate has the right to express its ment in Dublin and Brussels made the views on the subject at the ballot box. On mistake of thinking that obtaining support five occasions the Irish voted in favour of for the Treaty would be a mere formality. the European project at issue – member- As it happened, electoral participation ship of the EC in 1972, and the revision of dropped to 35 per cent, and 54 per cent of the treaties in 1987, 1992, 1998 and 2002. the Irish electorate voted “No”. The most Thus in June 2001 it came as a complete famous slogan was “If you don’t know, surprise to other Europeans when the Irish vote No”. Almost one in two of those who spotlight europe rejected the Treaty of Nice. had voted against the Treaty stated that they felt they had not been given enough and the Dáil, it envisages a mandate from information. the UN Security Council. The “No” camp was spearheaded by the • Supplemental clause: A new clause in Greens, Sinn Féin and the Socialist Party. the Irish constitution provided a guarantee Their campaign was based on polarization: that Ireland would not participate in the “No to Nice, No to NATO”, and “You will common European defence policy before lose Power, Money and Freedom”. The op- the electorate had given its express assent ponents of the Treaty warned against at- to such a step in a referendum. tempts to undermine the traditional Irish policy of neutrality by the introduction of the EU rapid reaction force, which they perceived as a forerunner of a European army. Furthermore, they believed that the smaller member states would be marginal- ized by the new decision-making system, and predicted the emergence of a Euro- pean super-state and a “tidal wave of im- migration” as a result of eastern enlarge- ment. 2 II Page What were the conse- quences of the “No” to the Treaty of Nice? In order to secure the support of the elec- torate in a second referendum held in Oc- tober 2002, the Irish government imple- mented a number of specific measures: Green Light from the Emerald Isle? Isle? Emerald from the Light Green • National Forum on Europe: The all-party National Forum on Europe was established in October 2001. Its members included both supporters of the treaty and euro- sceptics. The aim was to remedy the in- formation deficit among voters and to fa- # 2008/05 cilitate a broad debate about Ireland’s membership of the EU and the future of Europe. • Parliamentary scrutiny: The Irish gov- ernment enhanced the rights of the par- • National Declaration of Ireland: The liament with regard to European policy is- Irish government emphasized in this sues by instituting a new “Committee on declaration, which is not legally binding, European Affairs” and by mandating a that the traditional policy of neutrality strict government duty to provide informa- would not be affected by the Treaty of tion. Nice. A “triple lock” was enacted for par- ticipation in EU military operations. In ad- As a result of all this, the second referen- dition to assent from the Irish government dum was a success. A broad majority (63 spotlight europe per cent) of the Irish voters gave the green light for eastern enlargement and the nec- two predominant parties. Fianna Fáil has essary institutional reforms. A decisive been the strongest political force in Ire- factor was the mobilization of voters who land since 1932, whereas Fine Gael has had abstained in the first referendum. usually been in opposition. After the par- liamentary elections in May 2007 and III more than ten years of two-party rule un- der Fianna Fáil and the liberal Progressive Democrats, the government was expanded What is the current mood to include a new coalition partner, the in the country? Greens. Although more than 90 per cent of the For a long time there was a danger that Treaty of Lisbon is identical with the Con- Prime Minister Bertie Ahern’s bad ap- stitutional Treaty, in Ireland support for proval ratings might have an adverse ef- the new European basic document seems fect on the result of the referendum. to have evaporated. The large number of Whilst Ahern was being touted as a prom- undecided voters makes it especially diffi- ising candidate for the forthcoming office cult to predict the result of the vote on 12 of President of the European Council on June. More than two-thirds of the Irish the European stage, at home 54 per cent of electorate is of the opinion that it does not the voters were dissatisfied with him, and 3 know enough about what the treaty con- as many as 78 per cent doubted his credi- tains, and only one voter in ten feels that bility. “Teflon Bertie”, who had always Page he has actually been given sufficient in- managed to shrug things off in the past, formation. It is a noteworthy and perturb- finally stepped down from all his political ing fact that it was precisely this lack of offices on 6 May on account of persistent information which led to the rejection of criticism of his personal financial dealings the Treaty of Nice in the referendum held and accusations of corruption. The danger in June 2001. of an anti-Ahern vote has thus been averted. It is now up to his successor Voter participation will be of decisive im- Brian Cowen, hitherto Minister for Fi- portance for the outcome of the referen- nance, to secure Irish approval for the dum on the Reform Treaty. In the past the Treaty of Lisbon. Green Light from the Emerald Isle? Isle? Emerald from the Light Green average participation in referendums was slightly above 52 per cent. The situation IV will become rather precarious if participa- tion, as in the case of the first unsuccess- ful referendum on the Treaty of Nice (35 Are the Irish still per cent), were to sink significantly below pro-European? the 50 per cent mark. The opponents of # 2008/05 the treaty will no doubt, as always, man- Ireland has always been one of the mem- age to mobilize their supporters as the ber states whose citizens have had the campaign progresses. most positive attitude towards European integration. The figures published in the Thus in the run-up to the referendum the most recent Eurobarometer show that 74 Irish political parties have an important per cent of the Irish – compared to an EU task to accomplish. In Ireland the classic average of 58 per cent – believe that their cleavages are of only secondary impor- country’s membership of the EU is “a good tance, and categories such as “right” and thing”. And as many as 87 per cent, which “left” are devoid of meaning. To this day is the highest figure in the whole of the the political parties owe far more to the European Union, are convinced that Ire- struggle for Irish independence in the land benefits from its membership of the 1920s. It saw the rise of what are still the EU. spotlight europe On account of the traditional Irish policy dom. One particular opt-out negotiated by of neutrality, the Irish government has al- its British neighbours has direct implica- ways expressed reservations about par- tions for the “Emerald Isle”. The two states ticipating in the Common Defence Policy. have traditionally formed a “Common However, 67 per cent of the Irish are in Travel Area” in which there are no border fact in favour of a Common Security and controls. Their geographical situation as Defence Policy, and 66 per cent would islands without direct land borders with welcome a Common Foreign Policy. other member states is perceived in Dub- 4 Page Yet positive opinion poll results do not lin and London as an advantage in the provide a guarantee that a referendum will fight against organized crime and illegal turn out to be a success. Virtually identi- immigration. Furthermore, the UK and Ire- Green Light from the Emerald Isle? Isle? Emerald from the Light Green cal results were obtained before the first land have similar legal systems, in which referendum on the Treaty of Nice – and at common law – and not statute law as on the end of the day the Irish still said “No”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008
    Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 Markus Schmidgen democracy international is a network promoting direct democracy. Our basic goal is the establishment of direct democracy (initiative and referendum) as a complement to representative democracy within the European Union and in the nation states. We also work on the general democratisation of the European Union, democratic reform and more direct and participatory democracy worldwide. http://www.democracy-international.org Written by Markus Schmidgen Layout: Ronald Pabst Proof-reading (contents):, Gayle Kinkead, Ronald Pabst, Thomas Rupp Proof-reading (language): Sheena A. Finley, Warren P. Mayr Advice: Dr. Klaus Hofmann, Bruno Kaufmann, Frank Rehmet Please refer all questions to: [email protected] Published by democracy international V 0.9 (4.9.2008) Evaluation of the Irish Referendum on Lisbon Treaty, June 2008 I Introduction This report examines the process of the Irish CONTENT referendum on the Treaty of Lisbon. The referendum was held on June 12, 2008 and was the only referendum on this treaty. The evaluation is I INTRODUCTION .......................................... 3 based on the criteria set by the Initiative and Referendum Institute Europe (IRIE). These criteria are internationally recognized as standards to II SETTING...................................................... 4 measure how free and fair a referendum process is conducted. This enables the reader to compare the II.1 Background ................................................... 4 Irish Lisbon referendum to other referendums and to identify the points that could be improved as well II.2 Actors ............................................................. 4 as those that are an example to other nations. II.3 Evaluation...................................................... 7 We at Democracy International and our European partners have already published a series of reports on the EU constitutional referenda of 2005: Juan III CONCLUSION.........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish Party System Sistemul Partidelor Politice În Irlanda
    The Irish Party System Sistemul Partidelor Politice în Irlanda Assistant Lecturer Javier Ruiz MARTÍNEZ Fco. Javier Ruiz Martínez: Assistant Lecturer of Polics and Public Administration. Department of Politics and Sociology, University Carlos III Madrid (Spain). Since September 2001. Lecturer of “European Union” and “Spanish Politics”. University Studies Abroad Consortium (Madrid). Ph.D. Thesis "Modernisation, Changes and Development in the Irish Party System, 1958-96", (European joint Ph.D. degree). Interests and activities: Steering Committee member of the Spanish National Association of Political Scientists and Sociologists; Steering committee member of the European Federation of Centres and Associations of Irish Studies, EFACIS; Member of the Political Science Association of Ireland; Founder of the Spanish-American Association of the University of Limerick (Éire) in 1992; User level in the command of Microsoft Office applications, graphics (Harvard Graphics), databases (Open Access) SPSSWIN and Internet applications. Abstract: The Irish Party System has been considered a unique case among the European party systems. Its singularity is based in the freezing of its actors. Since 1932 the three main parties has always gotten the same position in every election. How to explain this and which consequences produce these peculiarities are briefly explained in this article. Rezumat: Sistemul Irlandez al Partidelor Politice a fost considerat un caz unic între sistemele partidelor politice europene. Singularitatea sa este bazată pe menţinerea aceloraşi actori. Din 1932, primele trei partide politice ca importanţă au câştigat aceeaşi poziţie la fiecare scrutin electoral. Cum se explică acest lucru şi ce consecinţe produc aceste aspecte, se descrie pe larg în acest articol. At the end of the 1950s the term ‘system’ began to be used in Political Science coming from the natural and physical Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey: English
    The Economic and Social Research Institute 4 Burlington Road Dublin 4 Ph. 6671525 IRISH ELECTION SURVEY, SUMMER 2002 Interviewer’s Name ____________________ Interviewer’s Number Constituency Code Area Code Respondent Code Date of Interview: Day Month Time Interview Began (24hr clock) Introduction (Ask for named respondent) Good morning/afternoon/evening. I am from the Economic and Social Research Institute in Dublin. We have been commissioned by a team of researchers from Trinity College Dublin and University College Dublin to carry out a survey into the way people voted in the recent general election. You have been selected at random from the Electoral Register to participate in the survey. The interview will take about 60 minutes to complete and all information provided will be treated in the strictest confidence by the Economic and Social Research Institute. It will not be possible for anyone to identify your individual views or attitudes from the analysis undertaken on the data. __________________________________________________________________________________ SECTION A A1 First, I’d like to ask you a general question. What do you think has been the single most important issue facing Ireland over the last five years? ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ A2 How good or bad a job do you think the Fianna Fail/Progressive Democrat government did over the past five years in terms of _______________________ [the Main issue mentioned at A1 above]. Did they do a: Very Good Job......... 1 Good Job ......... 2 Bad Job ..... 3 Very Bad Job…… 4 Don’t know ..... 5 A3.1a Looking back on the recent general election campaign in May of this year, could you tell me if a candidate called to your home? Yes ......
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • Mediated Political Participation: Comparative Analysis of Right Wing and Left Wing Alternative Media
    Mediated Political Participation: Comparative Analysis of Right Wing and Left Wing Alternative Media A dissertation presented to the faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Nune Grigoryan August 2019 © 2019 Nune Grigoryan. All Rights Reserved. This dissertation titled Mediated Political Participation: Comparative Analysis of Right Wing and Left Wing Alternative Media by NUNE GRIGORYAN has been approved for the School of Media Arts & Studies and the Scripps College of Communication by Wolfgang Suetzl Assistant Professor of Media Arts & Studies Scott Titsworth Dean, Scripps College of Communication ii Abstract GRIGORYAN, NUNE, PhD, August 2019, Mass Communication Mediated Political Participation: Comparative Analysis of Right Wing and Left Wing Alternative Media Director of dissertation: Wolfgang Suetzl Democracy allows a plural media landscape where different types of media perform vital functions. Over years, the public trust towards mainstream media has been eroding, limiting their ability to fulfill democratic functions within the American society. Meanwhile, the Internet has led to proliferation of alternative media outlets on digital space. These platforms allow new outreach and mobilizing opportunities to the once peripheral alternative media. So far, the literature about alternative media have been heavily focused on left-wing alternative media outlets, while the research on alternative right-wing media has remained scarce and fragmented. Only few studies have applied a comparative analysis approach to study these outlets. Moreover, research that examines different aspects of alternative media such as content and audience reception is more rare. This study aims to demonstrate the heterogeneity of alternative media by highlighting their history and functions within the American democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Parties and Policy Making in Ireland
    Introduction: Parties and policy making in Ireland C o n t i n u i t y One of the most remarkable aspects of post-Treaty Ireland was how well the political institutions established by the British colonial administration survived. This is not altogether surprising when one considers that the Irish struggle for independence ended in ‘a compromise with the former coloniser which denied true emancipation’. 1 Many members of the new elite ‘found nothing better to do with their freedom than to duplicate the British system’ while ‘a new use was found for the Irish language as a kind of green spray-paint to be coated over the remaining British pillar boxes, systems and titles, in order to conceal the ever-growing similarity with the British way of life’. 2 Kevin O’Higgins ’ s conviction that they ‘were probably the most conservative-minded revolutionaries that ever put through a successful revolution’ 3 gives some idea of the limitations and parameters within which the Free State would take shape. The survival of the British civil service, based in Dublin Castle, provides a striking example of the basic continuity that followed the Treaty. ‘Independence’, Basil Chubb notes, ‘did not much aff ect the well-established and powerful departments’ and for the former British civil service ‘life went on much as before’. 4 Under the Treaty, the position of former colonial administration employees was protected and most managed to exchange political masters with equanimity. A small number (about one hundred) voluntarily transferred to Belfast to serve the Northern Ireland administration. The transition from colonial power to a native administration did not, therefore, impinge greatly on the civil service.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution and Government
    Date Printed: 04/21/2009 JTS Box Number: lFES 65 Tab Number: 20 Document Title: Ireland Constitution and Government Document Date: 1995 Document Country: Ireland Document Language: English lFES ID: CE00864 Constitution and Government The President, Mrs. Mary {?obinson, addressing a joint session.oj the houus ofthe Oireachtas. " Ireland is a parliamentary demo~racy. The CONSTITUTION Houses of the Oireachtas and the National Parliamem (in the·Irish language, Government. It also defines the structure Oireachras) consists of the President (an The Constitution ofireland is the basic and powers of the courts, sets out the rUachraran) and two Houses: a House of law of the State, It was adopted by fundamental rights of citizens and contain; Representatives (Diil Eireann) and a plebiscite in 1937. It is the successor of the a number of directive principles of social Senate (Seanad Eireann). The sole and Constitution of Diil Eireann (I 919) and policy for the general guidance of me exclusive power of making laws for the the Constitution of the Irish Free State Oireachtas. The Constitution may be State is vested in Parliament. The functions (I922). The Constitution states that all amended only by referendum. and powers of the President, Diil and legislative, executive and judicial powers of Seanad derive from the Constitution of Government derive from the people. It sets The Consrimtion outlines what are Ireland (Bunreacht na hEireann) and law. out the form of government and defines considered the fundamental rights of the the powers of the President, the two citizen. The definition of rights in the Fact Sheet 2/95 Issued by the Department of Foreign Affairs, Dublin.
    [Show full text]
  • Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019
    Codebook: Government Composition, 1960-2019 Codebook: SUPPLEMENT TO THE COMPARATIVE POLITICAL DATA SET – GOVERNMENT COMPOSITION 1960-2019 Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann The Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set provides detailed information on party composition, reshuffles, duration, reason for termination and on the type of government for 36 democratic OECD and/or EU-member countries. The data begins in 1959 for the 23 countries formerly included in the CPDS I, respectively, in 1966 for Malta, in 1976 for Cyprus, in 1990 for Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia, in 1991 for Poland, in 1992 for Estonia and Lithuania, in 1993 for Latvia and Slovenia and in 2000 for Croatia. In order to obtain information on both the change of ideological composition and the following gap between the new an old cabinet, the supplement contains alternative data for the year 1959. The government variables in the main Comparative Political Data Set are based upon the data presented in this supplement. When using data from this data set, please quote both the data set and, where appropriate, the original source. Please quote this data set as: Klaus Armingeon, Sarah Engler and Lucas Leemann. 2021. Supplement to the Comparative Political Data Set – Government Composition 1960-2019. Zurich: Institute of Political Science, University of Zurich. These (former) assistants have made major contributions to the dataset, without which CPDS would not exist. In chronological and descending order: Angela Odermatt, Virginia Wenger, Fiona Wiedemeier, Christian Isler, Laura Knöpfel, Sarah Engler, David Weisstanner, Panajotis Potolidis, Marlène Gerber, Philipp Leimgruber, Michelle Beyeler, and Sarah Menegal.
    [Show full text]
  • An End to ``Civil War Politics
    Electoral Studies 38 (2015) 71e81 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Electoral Studies journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/electstud An end to “Civil War politics”? The radically reshaped political landscape of post-crash Ireland * Adrian P. Kavanagh Maynooth University Department of Geography/National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland article info abstract Article history: The European debt crisis has impacted on electoral politics in most European states, but Received 27 June 2014 particularly in the Republic of Ireland. The severe nature of the economic crash and the Received in revised form 5 January 2015 subsequent application of austerity policies have brought large fluctuations in political Accepted 12 January 2015 support levels, with the three parties that have dominated the state since its foundation e Available online 21 January 2015 Fianna Fail, Fine Gael and Labour e all being adversely effected. The extent of these changes is highly controlled both by geography and by class, with political allegiances Keywords: proving to be highly fluid in certain parts of the state. Growing support levels for left wing Austerity Republic of Ireland parties and groupings, but most notably Sinn Fein, appear to be moving Irish politics away “ ” Civil War politics from the old Civil War style of politics and bringing it more into line with the traditional Class cleavage class cleavage politics of continental Europe. Electoral geography © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. The economic “crash” of 2008 has resulted in a long suffered electoral setbacks in most European states during period of recession and austerity policies in the Republic this period (with the Christian Democrats in Germany of Ireland, which has had profound impacts for the Irish proving to be a notable exception), these trends has been political system as well as for economic and social life particularly evident in the more peripheral states within within the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Names of Candidates Elected
    European Parliament Election Results 2014 European Parliament Election Results 2014 NAMES OF CANDIDATES ELECTED EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ELECTION TOTAL ELECTORATE 820,668 INVALID BALLOT PAPERS 6,368 LYNN BOYLAN (S.F.) 23 MAY 2014 VALID POLL 352,575 NESSA CHILDERS (NON-P.) NUMBER OF SEATS 3 BRIAN HAYES (F.G.) CONSTITUENCY OF DUBLIN QUOTA 88,144 First Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Seventh Count Count Count Count Count Count Count Transfer of Transfer of Transfer of Transfer of Transfer of Transfer of Darcy, T’s, Smith, B’s Costello, E’s Murphy, P’s Fitzpatrick, M’s Boylan, L’s NAMES OF CANDIDATES (12 No.) Tallon, J’s, Votes Votes Votes Votes Surplus (* Denotes outgoing member) Number Whitehead, R’s and Result and Result and Result and Result and Result of Votes and Wise, D’s Votes and Result BOYLAN, LYNN (S.F.) + 1,025 + 5,475 - - - - 1,620 83,264 84,289 89,764 89,764 89,764 89,764 88,144 * CHILDERS, NESSA (NON-P.) + 1,767 + 4,081 + 4,744 + 13,424 + 12,458 + 1,185 35,939 37,706 41,787 46,531 59,955 72,413 73,598 * Costello, Emer (Lab.) + 271 + 962 - 27,194 25,961 26,232 27,194 - - - - Darcy, Thomas (D.D.I.) - 4,022 4,022 - - - - - - Fitzpatrick, Mary (F.F.) + 671 + 825 + 2,581 + 2,225 - 50,585 44,283 44,954 45,779 48,360 50,585 - - HAYES, BRIAN (F.G.) + 456 + 524 + 7,935 + 1,541 + 8,185 + 88 54,676 55,132 55,656 63,591 65,132 73,317 73,405 * Murphy, Paul (S.P.) + 1,357 + 8,003 + 2,060 - 41,373 29,953 31,310 39,313 41,373 - - - Ryan, Eamon (G.P.) + 1,095 + 2,083 + 5,923 + 6,624 + 12,106 + 347 44,078 45,173 47,256 53,179 59,803 71,909 72,256
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Political Cleavages and Post-Crisis Transformations in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland, 1953-2020
    World Inequality Lab – Working Paper N° 2021/01 Historical Political Cleavages and Post-Crisis Transformations in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland, 1953-2020 Luis Bauluz Amory Gethin Clara Martínez-Toledano Marc Morgan January 2021 Historical Political Cleavages and Post-Crisis Transformations in Italy, Spain, Portugal and Ireland, 1953-2020 Luis Bauluz Amory Gethin Clara Martínez-Toledano Marc Morgan Abstract This paper combines post-electoral surveys to analyze the transformation of the structure of political cleavages in Italy, Spain, Portugal, and Ireland over the last decades. Although all four countries were late industrializers and were heavily impacted by the 2008 global recession, leading to a profound reconfiguration and transformation of their party systems, socioeconomic cleavages have not followed the exact same patterns. We document a progressive decline of class cleavages in Italy and Spain and an exacerbation of class divisions in Portugal and Ireland over the last decade. In Italy and Spain, despite their strong religious and regional divisions, we find growing support for social democratic, socialist, and affiliated parties among highest-educated voters, while top-income earners have remained more supportive of conservative forces, leading to the emergence of “multi-elite party systems” comparable to that found in other Western democracies. Portugal and Ireland have instead remained with their “single-elite party systems”, marked by the polarization of mainstream parties after the onset of the financial crisis in Portugal, the rise of Sinn Féin supported by low-income and lower-educated voters in Ireland, and the exceptional absence of strong far- right parties capturing the lower classes in both countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Sixth Dáil (12.7.1989 - 5.11.1992) Twenty First Government (12.7.1989 - 11.2.1992)
    HHIISSTTOORRYY OOFF GGOOVVEERRNNMMEENNTT –– TTWWEENNTTYY---SSIIXXTTHH DDÁÁIILL Twenty-Sixth Dáil (12.7.1989 - 5.11.1992) Twenty First Government (12.7.1989 - 11.2.1992) Name: Post held: Charles J. Haughey Taoiseach and (12.7.89 - 11.2.92) resigned Minister for the Gaeltacht - 11.2.92 (also acting Minister for Defence 1.11.90 - 5.2.91 also acting Minister for Finance 8.11.91 -14.11.91) Brian Lenihan Tánaiste and Minister for Defence (12.7.89 - 31.10.90 -dismissed) Albert Reynolds Minister for Finance (12.7.89 - 7.11.91 - dismissed) Bertie Ahern Minister for Labour (12.7.89 -14.11.91) Minister for Finance (14.11.91 - 11.2.92) John P. Wilson Minister for Environment (9.11.91 - 14.11.91) Tánaiste (13.11.1990 - 11.2.92) Minister for the Marine (12.7.89 - 11.2.92) Gerard Collins Minister for Foreign Affairs (12.7.89 - 11.2.92) Michael O'Kennedy Minister for Agriculture and Food (12.7.89 - 14.11.91) Minister for Labour (14.11.91 - 11.2.92) Michael J. Woods Minister for Social Welfare (12.7.89 - 14.11.91) Minister for Agriculture & Food (14.11.91 - 11.2.92) Desmond J. O'Malley Minister for Industry and Commerce (12.7.89 - 11.2.92) Robert Molloy Minister for Energy (12.7.89 - 11.2.92) Ray Burke Minister for Justice (12.7.89 - 11.2.92) Minister for Communications (12.7.89 - 6.2.91) Padraig Flynn Minister for the Environment (12.7.89 - 8.11.91 dismissed) Rory O'Hanlon Minister for Health (12.7.89 - 14.11.91) Minister for the Environment (14.11.91 - 11.2.92) Mary O'Rourke Minister for Education (12.7.89 - 14.11.91) Minister for Health (14.11.91 - 11.2.92) Seamus Brennan Minister for Tourism & Transport (12.7.89 - 6.2.91) and then Minister for Tourism, Transport & Communications (6.2.91 - 11.2.92) Brendan Daly Minister for Defence (5.2.91 - 14.11.91) Minister for Social Welfare (14.11.91 - 11.2.92) Noel Davern Minister for Education (14.11.91 - 11.2.92) Vincent Brady Minister for Defence (14.11.91 - 11.2.92) HHIISSTTOORRYY OOFF GGOOVVEERRNNMMEENNTT –– TTWWEENNTTYY---SSIIXXTTHH DDÁÁIILL Notes: 1.
    [Show full text]