DOCSLIB.ORG

Edmund, Earl of Lancaster Downloaded From

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Edmund, Earl of Lancaster Downloaded From 1895 19 Edmund, Earl of Lancaster Downloaded from PAET L EHAPS it has been the fate of Edmund, second son of Henry F HE, to receive less than his due of historical notice. The http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/ attractiveness of the character of his eider brother, the import- ance of the kingly position, and the scantiness of oar informa- tion about him as compared with Edward are obvious reasons for this neglect. Yet as king designate of Sicily Edmund was a factor, and, despite his youth, probably not an altogether passive factor, in the crisis which brought about the provisions of Oxford and the barons' war. To the overwrought impatience of the baronage the demand for 185,000 marks for the expense of getting at University of Michigan on June 11, 2015 the crown of Sicily for Edmund came as the last straw. The solace which his father provided for his disappointment of the Sicilian crown made him lord of the three great earldoms of Derby, Lancaster, and Leicester, besides extensive lands in the marches of Wales, in which he ruled like a little king. He nearly succeeded in gaining another earldom and other extensive possessions by his first marriage, while by his second he was consoled for his disap- pointment by becoming for eight years count regent of Champagne and lord, through his wife, of the five chdteUeniet which formed her dower until the outbreak of the French war in 1294. In this capacity he had the strongest interest in preserving that peace with France which gave Edward I time for his legal and constitu- tional reforms, and for the reduction of at least one part of Wales to some semblance of order as an appanage of the crown, in which Edmund was always ready to place his resources as a lord marcher of Wales and lord of three earldoms at the disposal of his brother. Edmund's desire for peace, too, largely contributed to bring about the treacherous seizure of Gascony by Philip IY, which was the effective cause of the war of 1294, a war which in its turn gave origin to the «*.Tn.fm of Edward HI to the French throne, through one of the conditions of the peace which terminated it—namely, the marriage of Isabella of France to Edward of Carnarvon. Edmund has a more direct and obvious importance in history than 20 EDMUND, EARL OF LANCASTER Jan. any to which these facts can give him claim, as the founder of the greatness of the house of Lancaster. Edmund, second son of Henry III and Eleanor of Provence, was born on 16 Jan. 1245, perhaps at Bury St. Edmunds, and was so named after the martyred East-Anglian king to whom Henry had prayed for a second son.1 We hear nothing further of him until 1254, bat meanwhile events were preparing for the first important incident of his life, his investiture by the pope with the crown of Sicily. The acquisition of the crown of Sicily by the emperor Henry YI Downloaded from had added a new element of bitterness to the medieval struggle between the papacy and the empire. The papal power was at once threatened at its centre and lost one of its chief supports against the emperor. The papacy 3aw itself forced to fight for life itself. The death of Henry VI removed the immediate danger; but the http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/ papacy never forgot it, and this recollection was the secret of the implacable hostility which from 1225 onwards it displayed towards his son Frederick II, its early protege, but when he became powerful and dangerous its most hated foe. For twenty-five years the struggle was intermittently continued, carried on very largely by papal exactions from the English clergy. At last by sudden and overwhelming disasters to Frederick II, and his death at University of Michigan on June 11, 2015 in 1250, the reigning pope, Innocent IV, the ablest and bitterest of Frederick's papal opponents, seemed on the point of gaining a decisive victory. Conrad IV, Frederick's son and successor in the empire, wished to make peace, but Innocent would have none of it so long as the emperor remained king of Sicily. All his efforts were directed to wresting Sicily from Conrad. As early as 1250 it was possibly offered by the pope to both Eichard of Cornwall, brother of Henry III of England, and Charles of Anjou, brother of Louis IX of France and count of Provence since 1246, in the hope that he might gain thereby the assistance of one of them in men or money.1 In August 1252 letters were addressed by him to St. Louis, Alfonse of Poitiers, his brother, and Henry m in almost identical terms, asking them to urge their respective brothers to accept his offer.1 But Manfred, an illegitimate son of Frederick II, was very successfully defending Sicily against the pope for his 1 Matt. Paris, Hist, itaior, iv. 406; Ann. Winion, ii. 90; Aim. Dunsi. iii. 166; Ann. Om. iv. 92; Wykes. iv. 92; Ann. Wujorn, iv. 437 ; John de Oxenedes, 174; Contin. Ftor. Wigon. (Tauter), ii. 179 (E. H. S.) Alienor regina peptrit filium, qvi, tx nomuu glorioti regia tt martyri* Edmtmdi, Ednumdut apptUatur, domino rtgt, per littrtcm mam domino Htnrieo abbati, hoc demandant*, ut inter tot amdictum fuit. The continnator copied from a chronicle written at St. Edmonds for this portion cf his work; and the abbot of St. Edmonds in 1215 was named Henry. 9 Hogo Koch, Richard von Cornwall, L 106; Bichard Stemfeld, Earl von Anjou al* Graf dor Proomct, p. 82. > Burner's Fotdtra, Becord e<L, L p 284. 1895 EDMUND, EARL OF LANCASTER 21 brother; so that neither Eichard nor Charles felt very eager about the offer. Richard requested several fortresses and hostages as security, as well as the payment of a very large part of his expenses by the pope; ' otherwise,' he said, ' the pope might as well give him the moon.' * Charles of Anjou nearly accepted the crown on the somewhat stringent conditions on which it was offered to him on 10 Jane 1253. But he was not yet thoroughly master of Provence, and the offer of TTn.inH.nIt:, which Margaret of Flanders made to him, along with the ties of kinship, induced him to refuse the somewhat shadowy boon for a more real advantage. So, though the negotia- Downloaded from tions do not seem to have been finally broken off so late as 27 Sept. 1258, the coming of this ' prince of peace and star of the morning, as Innocent IV called him, was not to take place for more than a decade.5 Disappointed of Richard and Charles, but still pursuing a double http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/ policy, Innocent, at the same time that he was negotiating a settle- ment with Conrad, on 6 March 1254 conferred the crown of Sicily on Edmund.6 Henry HI, ' lest he should seem to thirst for his own blood and the spoils of his kin' (Frederick H having married his sister Isabella as his second wife), still delayed accepting it, though the pope confirmed the grant on 14 May. But he had an- influential ally to promote his schemes in Thomas of Savoy, the queen's uncle, who had married his niece; and the death of at University of Michigan on June 11, 2015 Conrad IV on 21 May 1255, preceded in December by that of Henry, son of Frederick H by Isabella, removed the English king's scruples, though Conrad left a young son, Conradin.7 In- nocent IV now commuted Henry's vow of crusade to the pro- secution of his Sicilian claim in arms, and extended the tenth of ecclesiastical revenues levied for the crusade to the Holy Land, which was now to be turned to the purpose of a Sicilian expedition, from two to five years. Henry must curtail his expenses to raise money, get his son to have a seal made, and send a letter of accept- ance, with letters patent naming Edmund king. If Henry only came with a good army, there would be no resistance.8 But how- ever much Henry might like to have his vow of crusade commuted, and however eagerly his ambition might accept the offer of the crown for his son, he was already in debt, and England was by no means the mine of wealth the papal curia believed it to be. So nothing was done; and, though he never revoked the grant to Edmund, Innocent made terms with Manfred, who had soon come to the front in spite of a provision in Conrad's will, pro- bably dictated by an ignoble jealousy, which appointed the incom- 4 Matt. Paris, Hist. Maior, r. 457. » Sternfeld, pp. 92-45; Btgtitru d'Innocent 17, ed. E. Berger, tome viii. introd. p. 278. • Bymer, L 297. ' Ibid. i. 30L ' Ibid. L 302-4. 22 EDMUND, EARL OF LANCASTER Jan. petent Bertold, margrave of Homburg, regent. The agreement, which ignored Edmund's ftUimn altogether, was arrived at on 27 Sept. But the reconciliation was a hollow one. A certain Borello d'Anglone, after attempting to take Manfred in an ambush, was murdered by the inhabitants of Teano, who were devoted to Manfred and thought he had slain him. The papal party were only too eager to accuse Manfred of the guilt of con- nivance. Deserted by Bertold of Homburg, he fled for his life across the Apennines with a few followers, and after several hair- breadth escapes found refuge and support amongst the Saracens of Downloaded from Lucera.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Early History of Man's Activities in the Quernmore Area
    I Contrebis 2000 The Early History of Man's Activities in the Quernmore Area. Phil Hudson Introduction This paper hopes to provide a chronological outline of the events which were important in creating the landscape changes in the Quernmore forest area. There was movement into the area by prehistoric man and some further incursions in the Anglo- Saxon and the Norse periods leading to Saxon estates and settled agricultural villages by the time of the Norman Conquest. These villages and estates were taken over by the Normans, and were held of the King, as recorded in Domesday. The Post-Nonnan conquest new lessees made some dramatic changes and later emparked, assarted and enclosed several areas of the forest. This resulted in small estates, farms and vaccaries being founded over the next four hundred years until these enclosed areas were sold off by the Crown putting them into private hands. Finally there was total enclosure of the remaining commons by the 1817 Award. The area around Lancaster and Quernmore appears to have been occupied by man for several thousand years, and there is evidence in the forest landscape of prehistoric and Romano-British occupation sites. These can be seen as relict features and have been mapped as part of my on-going study of the area. (see Maps 1 & 2). Some of this field evidence can be supported by archaeological excavation work, recorded sites and artif.act finds. For prehistoric occupation in the district random finds include: mesolithic flints,l polished stone itxe heads at Heysham;'worked flints at Galgate (SD 4827 5526), Catshaw and Haythomthwaite; stone axe and hammer heads found in Quernmore during the construction of the Thirlmere pipeline c1890;3 a Neolithic bowl, Mortlake type, found in Lancaster,o a Bronze Age boat burial,s at SD 5423 5735: similar date fragments of cinerary urn on Lancaster Moor,6 and several others discovered in Lancaster during building works c1840-1900.7 Several Romano-British sites have been mapped along with finds of rotary quems from the same period and associated artifacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Report and Accounts Year Ended 31St March 2019
    Report and Accounts Year ended 31st March 2019 Preserving the past, investing for the future LLancaster Castle’s John O’Gaunt gate. annual report to 31st March 2019 Annual Report Report and accounts of the Duchy of Lancaster for the year ended 31 March 2019 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 2 of the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall (Accounts) Act 1838. annual report to 31st March 2019 Introduction Introduction History The Duchy of Lancaster is a private In 1265, King Henry III gifted to his estate in England and Wales second son Edmund (younger owned by Her Majesty The Queen brother of the future Edward I) as Duke of Lancaster. It has been the baronial lands of Simon de the personal estate of the reigning Montfort. A year later, he added Monarch since 1399 and is held the estate of Robert Ferrers, Earl separately from all other Crown of Derby and then the ‘honor, possessions. county, town and castle of Lancaster’, giving Edmund the new This ancient inheritance began title of Earl of Lancaster. over 750 years ago. Historically, Her Majesty The Queen, Duke of its growth was achieved via In 1267, Edmund also received Lancaster. legacy, alliance and forfeiture. In from his father the manor of more modern times, growth and Newcastle-under-Lyme in diversification have been delivered Staffordshire, together with lands through active asset management. and estates in both Yorkshire and Lancashire. This substantial Today, the estate covers 18,481 inheritance was further enhanced hectares of rural land divided into by Edmund’s mother, Eleanor of five Surveys: Cheshire, Lancashire, Provence, who bestowed on him Staffordshire, Southern and the manor of the Savoy in 1284.
    [Show full text]
  • 80 in Which We Dawdle When Edward I Arrived Back in 1289 from Gascony, He Was in Many Ways at the Height of His Awesomeness
    80 In which we Dawdle When Edward I arrived back in 1289 from Gascony, he was in many ways at the height of his awesomeness. A chivalric monarch, a leading statesman in Christendom, and at least partly responsible for legal reforms, that will cause a historian to call him 'the English Justinian'. But he also had problems. He was strapped for cash. There was a background of discontent against the firmness of Edward's rule. But Edward was a clever politician as well as a chivalric monarch, and knew how to negotiate his way back to popularity - and it would not be good news for England's Jewish community. 16th-century illustration of Edward I presiding over Parliament. The scene shows Alexander III of Scotland and Llywelyn ap Gruffudd of Wales on either side of Edward; an episode that never actually occurred. (From Wiki). Joan of Acre Arms of de Clare Arms of Monthermer Northampton Charing Cross Geddington Plaque at Northampton Eleanor of Castile 81 The Great Cause Through a stunning piece of bad luck, Alexander III left no heirs. And now there was no clear successor to his throne of Scotland. For the search for the right successor, the Scottish Guardians of the Realm turned to Scotland's friend - England. But Edward had other plans - for him this was a great opportunity to revive the claims of the kings of England to be overlords of all Britain. The Maid of Norway Coronation Chair and Stone of Scone Stain Glass window Lerwick Town Hall King Edward's Chair today sans the Stone of Destiny.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Lancaster Estates in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries
    NOTES ON THE LANCASTER ESTATES IN THE THIRTEENTH AND FOURTEENTH CENTURIES BY DOROTHEA OSCHINSKY, D.Phil., Ph.D. Read 24 April 1947 UR knowledge of mediaeval estate administration is O based mainly on sources which relate to ecclesiastical estates, because these are easier of access and, as a rule, more complete. The death of an abbot affected a monastic estate only in so far as his successor might be a better or a worse husbandman; the estate was never divided between heirs, was not diminished by the endowment of widows and daughters, and was not doubled by prudent marriages as were seignorial estates. Furthermore, the ecclesiastics had frequently been granted their lands in frankalmoin, and no rent or service was rendered in return. With few exceptions their manors lay near the centre of the estate; and, finally, the clerics had sufficient leisure to supervise their estates themselves and little difficulty in providing a staff trained to work the estates intensively and profitably. Therefore we realise that any conclusions which are based on ecclesiastical estates only must necessarily be one-sided, and that before we can draw a general picture of the estate administration in the Middle Ages, we have to work out the estate adminis­ tration on at least some of the more important seignorial estates. The Lancaster estates with their changing fate are well able to reveal the chief characteristics of a seignorial estate, its extent, management and administration. The vastness of the estates of the Earls of Lancaster, and the importance of the family in the political history of the country, accen­ tuated and multiplied the difficulties of the estate adminis­ tration.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaris Capture Pro Software
    The Red Rose of Lancaster? JOHN ASHDOWN—HILL In the fifteenth century the rival houses of Lancaster and York fought the ‘Wars of the Roses’ for possession of the crown. When, in 1485, the new Tudor monarch, Henry VII, brought these wars to an end, he united, by his mam'age to Elizabeth of York, the red rose of Lancaster and the white rose of York, to create a new emblem and a new dynasty. Thus was born the Tudor rose. So might run a popular account, and botanists, searching through the lists of medieval rose cultivars, have even proposed identifications of the red rose of Lancaster with Rosa Gallica and the white rose of York with Rosa Alba, while the bi-coloured Tudor rose is linked to the naturally occurring variegated sport of Rosa Gallica known as ‘Rosa Mundi’ (Rosa Gallica versicolor), or alternatively, to the rather paler Rosa Damascena versicolor. It should, perhaps, be observed that Rosa Gallica, while somewhat variable in colour. is more likely to be a shade of pink than bright red, and Rosa Alba, while generally white in colour, also occurs in shades of pink, so that in nature the colour~distinction between the two roses is not always clear. ‘Rosa Mundi’ is also strictly speaking variegated in two shades of pink, rather than being literally red and white.‘ The label ‘Wars of the Roses’was a late invention, first employed only in 1829, by Sir Walter Scott, in his romantic novel Anne of Geierstein.2 The story of the rose emblems might appear on casual inspection to be well-founded, for we find ample evidence of Tudor roses bespattering Tudor coinage and royal architecture, for example, at Hampton Court, the Henry VII chapel at Westminster, and at Cambridge, on the gates of Christ’s and St John’s Colleges, and in King’s College chapel.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crouchbank Legend Revisted T.P.J
    The Crouchbank Legend Revisted T.P.J. EDLIN With great interest I read John Ashdown-Hill’s stimulating article on the Lancastrian claim to the throne and Henry IV’s use of his descent from Edmund Crouchback, Earl of Lancaster and younger son of Henry III, to formulate a claim to the throne based on the legend that Edmund had in fact been the elder brother of Edward I. This brought to mind several additional thoughts which are set out here in the manner of an augmentation rather than a refutation. First, I discuss recent work which has advanced the claims of John Hardyng’s Chronicle as a source for the background to Henry IV’s usurpation and his use of the ‘Crouchback legend’, and which suggests that there was a systematic and ambitious plan to hijack chronicle evidence in Henry’s favour — a plan which failed, but may ultimately have helped to perpetuate a stubborn if ill-defined remnant of the Crouchback myth. Secondly, the poem Richard the Redeless will be considered, and the possibility that its guardedly Lancastrian perspective hints at the general currency of ideas about Henry’s legitimacy — and, at the same time, Richard II’s illegitimacy — as king. There are, in conclusion, some further thoughts on the differing interpretations of the meaning of Henry’s claim that he was taking the throne as the legitimate heir, ‘of the right line of the blood’ in descent from Henry III. It seems to me that the ‘contemporary tradition that ([Henry III’s son) Edmund was born before his brother Edward’ cited by John Ashdown-Hill refers to the life-time of John of Gaunt.2 Such a promotion (or even invention) of every possible (or impossible) right or claim within Gaunt’s immediate family was entirely consistent with his character and career.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenilworth Castle
    Student Booklet Kenilworth Castle 1 Introduction and Overview We hope you have been lucky enough to visit this historic site but even if you have not, we hope this guide will help you to really understand the castle and how it developed over time. Where is Kenilworth Castle? The castle and landscape: Aerial view of the castle, mere and surrounding landscape. 2 What is the layout of Kenilworth Castle? Castle Plan 3 Key Phases 1100s Kenilworth under the De Clintons 1120-1174 Kenilworth as a royal fortress 1174-1244 1200s Kenilworth under Simon de Montfort 1244-65 Kenilworth under the House of Lancaster 1266-136 1300s Kenilworth under John of Gaunt 1361-99 1400s Kenilworth under the Lancastrians and the Tudors 1399-1547 1500s Kenilworth under the Dudley family 1547-88 1600s Kenilworth under the Stuarts 1612-65 1700s Kenilworth under the Hydes 1665-1700s Activity 1. Make your own copy of this timeline on a sheet of A4 paper. Just mark in the seven main phases. As you read through this guide add in details of the development of the castle. This timeline will probably become a bit messy but don’t worry! Keep it safe and at the end of the guide we will give you some ideas on how to summarise what you have learned. 2. There are seven periods of the castle's history listed in the timeline. Some of the English Heritage experts came up with titles for five of the periods of the castle's history: • An extraordinary palace • A stunning place of entertainment • A castle fit for kings • A formidable fortress • A royal stronghold 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Plantagenet Times to Sheffield Ca. 1800
    Chapter 17 Plantagenet times to Sheffield ca. 1800 600 YEARS FROM THE PLANT NAME’S ORIGINS TO A PLANT’S YARD PLANT FAMILY October 1998. One of a series of Chapters by Dr. John S. Plant, Keele University, England, ST5 5BG. parse evidence for 13th century ‘origins’ to the Plant name yields hints of a Plantagenet influ- S ence. Powerful political controversies surrounding Plantagenet-related words may have led to our current need for caution when considering the contemporaneity of various evolving meanings of plant. Trade and war may have influenced both the advent of the Plant name in the north west of England and the Plants’ subsequent advances across the north Midlands, in their progress towards the clearer light that 17th century records bring. The later sections of this Chapter outline the progress of a particular line of Plants from 17th century Cheshire through north Derbyshire to 18th century Sheffield. Their apparent descent inter- sects an environment that includes some key industrial developments. 17.1 A smattering of medieval Plant records ¢¡¤£¦¥¨§ © ©©© !"#¤$&%'#()%'!*+, - ,!*.0/1#(,21 #(34).15!"687:9;<.)).)¨#= ().@?BAC5!¢2D%¢FEG!H, I%'!*.JE4%KL MONP %¢3) ¦ P,#0Q$R#TS¦U¤5J%'!*3 -2;%¢3),!¢ -"#= > R !*%'# -.4¢?VW!B$RX #(34).Y5)!8EG# -.!¢ I).)ZEL!¢[$!¢!* ,"\X5!*5) !").]68# 5 > ^ `_G# -.)-5) ! !* a$"5)!¢ !5!Z+a=b/c2Y<a#¦$d/Y)21=e#(3)).@?fA"5!W#5!¢ * $"5)<%-5 5)g)%'!c.)</c)-5!*.ihbj¨(3) !DS¦U+?S¦kI f5).l EL#(3)nm(©op/c+2J+n !*%'# -.)g).q$Rg#( 5!H#(35Ors<)%'#()54 !8%'#(¢ P #(3)4.]tu#(<.)/1!*sv3),C# -5]#=¨68# =e#(K]).OAC5!7T-5@? AC5)!*,!Q$R#;S¦U¤5O%'!*+3
    [Show full text]
  • THE MISSING EARL: RICHARD FITZALAN, EARL of ARUNDEL and SURREY, and the ORDER of the GARTER Michael Burtscher
    Third Series Vol. III part 2. ISSN 0010-003X No. 214 Price £12.00 Autumn 2007 THE COAT OF ARMS an heraldic journal published twice yearly by The Heraldry Society THE COAT OF ARMS The journal of the Heraldry Society Third series Volume III 2007 Part 2 Number 214 in the original series started in 1952 The Coat of Arms is published twice a year by The Heraldry Society, whose registered office is 53 High Street, Burnham, Slough SL1 7JX. The Society was registered in England in 1956 as registered charity no. 241456. Founding Editor †John Brooke-Little, C.V.O., M.A., F.H.S. Honorary Editors C. E. A. Cheesman, M.A., PH.D., Rouge Dragon Pursuivant M. P. D. O’Donoghue, M.A., Bluemantle Pursuivant Editorial Committee Adrian Ailes, B.A., F.S.A., F.H.S. Jackson W. Armstrong, B.A. Andrew Hanham, B.A., PH.D. Advertizing Manager John Tunesi of Liongam THE COAT OF ARMS THE MISSING EARL: RICHARD FITZALAN, EARL OF ARUNDEL AND SURREY, AND THE ORDER OF THE GARTER Michael Burtscher The omission of Richard Fitzalan, Earl of Arundel and Surrey (c.1307-1376) from the Order of Garter has always been regarded with great puzzlement by historians.1 More so because, in 1344, Arundel was chosen to be part of Edward III’s new projects to refound the Arthurian Round Table; a project which had its origins in the political crisis of 1340-41 as a reconciliatory body to mend the wounds left by the crisis and as a galvanising element in the Anglo-French conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • John, "Of Gaunt," Duke of Lancaster (Family Lineage Through Starnes, Beaumont)
    John, "of Gaunt," Duke of Lancaster (family lineage through Starnes, Beaumont) John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster b. March 1340, d. 3 February 1398/99; Father: Edward III, King of England1 b. 13 November 1312, d. 21 June 1377 Mother: Philippa d' Avesnes L.G.1 b. between 1313 and 1315, d. 15 August 1369 John, "of Gaunt," Duke of Lancaster was the fourth son of King Edward III.2 Also called John "of Gaunt" Plantagenet. Arms: England, label ermine.3 He was born in March 1340 at St. Bavon's Abbey, Ghent, Flanders, Belgium.4,5,6 He was the son of Edward III, King of England and Philippa d' Avesnes L.G..1 John, "of Gaunt," Duke of Lancaster was created Earl of Richmond by his father on 20 September 1342.7,5 Earl of Richmond at England between 20 September 1342 and 4 February 1399.5,7 He was the successor of Henry, "of Grosmont," Duke of Lancaster; 1st Duke of Lancaster.8,9,10 John, "of Gaunt," Duke of Lancaster married Blanche, Baroness Lancaster, daughter of Henry, "of Grosmont," Duke of Lancaster and Isabel de Beaumont, on 19 May 1359 at Reading Abbey, Berkshire, England; His 1st. 2nd cousins, 1x removed.11 John, "of Gaunt," Duke of Lancaster associated with Marie de St. Hilaire before 1360; Mistress.12 5th Earl of Lancaster in 1361.1 Knight of the Garter circa April 1361. John, "of Gaunt," Duke of Lancaster was nominated into the Order of the Garter, #36, circa April 1361.5,2 He styled himself, following the death of his father-in-law s.p.m., Earl of Richmond, Lancaster, Derby, and Lincoln on 21 July 1361.11 He was created Lord of Beaufort and Nogent, also in right of his first wife, on 14 August 1361.12 He succeeded his sister-in-law, Matilda of Lancaster, as Earl of Derby, Earl of Leicester, and Earl of Lincoln on 10 April 1362.12 He was as Earl of Lancaster, created Duke of Lancaster on 13 November 1362.11 2nd Duke of Lancaster at England between 13 November 1362 and 3 February 1399.13 He was created Lord of Bergerac and Roche-sur-Yon on 8 October 1370.12 Lord of Bergerac and Roche-sur-Yon at France between 8 October 1370 and 4 February 1399.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Kenilworth Castle 12Th Century
    THE HISTORY OF KENILWORTH CASTLE 12TH CENTURY - When and why people first created the site Kenilworth Castle was founded in the early 1120s by Geoffrey de Clinton, Lord Chamberlain and treasurer to Henry I Clinton was a local rival to Roger de Beaumont, the Earl of Warwick and owner of the neighbouring Warwick Castle, and the king made Clinton the sheriff in Warwickshire to act as a counterbalance to Beaumont's power. Henry I’s son had died and so he needed to show that he was powerful even though he did not have an heir The castle's original form is uncertain. It has been suggested that it consisted of a motte, an earthen mound surmounted by wooden buildings; however, the stone great tower may have been part of the original design. Henry II (Henry I’s grandson)succeeded to the throne at the end of a Civil war that lasted from 1135 to 1154 but during the revolt of 1173–74 he faced a significant uprising led by his son, Henry, backed by the French crown. The conflict spread across England and Kenilworth was garrisoned by Henry II's forces; By this point Kenilworth Castle consisted of the great keep, the inner bailey wall, a basic causeway across the smaller lake that preceded the creation of the Great Mere, and the local chase for hunting. De Clinton’s Keep. Windows were added much later, these would have been arrow slits and fishtail arrow slits in the original keep. THE HISTORY OF KENILWORTH CASTLE 13TH CENTURY – King John - Henry's successor, Richard I, paid relatively little attention to Kenilworth, but under King John significant building resumed at the castle.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANTAGENET :Prepared by WILLIAM G SCROGGINS 06 Mar
    PLANTAGENET 1159424. JOHN PLANTAGENET OF GAUNT Born 23 Jun 1340 Ghent, Flanders Died 03 Feb 1399 Leicester Castle Married (1) Blanche Plantagenet of Lancaster 19 May 1359 Born Died 31 Sep 1369 Children (1) (order of birth unknown): Philippa Plantagenet b. d. 1415 m. John I, King of Portugal, KG Elizabeth Plantagenet b. d. 1425 m. (1) John de Hastings, 3rd Earl of Pembroke (div. 1383) (2) John de Holland, Earl of Huntingdon, Duke of Exeter, KG (3) John Cornwell, Baron Fanhope, Baron Milbroke, KG John Plantagenet b. d. young m. Edward Plantagenet b. d. young m. John Plantagenet b. d. young m. Henry Plantagenet of Bolingbroke, King of England b. 03 Apr 1367 Bolingbroke Castle, Lincolnshire, England d. 20 Mar 1412/3 Westminster Palace m. (1) Mary de Bohun bet 30 Jul 1380-10 Feb 1380/1 Rochford, Essex (2) Joan of Navarre 1402 Isabel Plantagenet b. d. young m. Married (2) Constance (Constanza) of Castile and Leon -- Jun 1371 :Prepared by WILLIAM G SCROGGINS 06 Mar 1997 : 718 Mill Valley Drive, Taylor Mill KY 41015-2278 1 PLANTAGENET Born Died -- Jun 1394 Child (2): Catherine Plantagenet b. d. 1418 m. Henry III, King of Castile and Leon Married (3) 1159425. Katherine Rouet Swynford -- Jan 1396/7 Born 1350 Died 10 May 1403 Children (3) (order of birth unknown): 579712. John Beaufort, Marquess of Dorset, Earl of Somerset, KG b. c1370 d. 16 Mar 1409/10 m. 579713. Margaret de Holland before 28 Sep 1397 Henry Beaufort, Bishop of Lincoln, Bishop of Winchester, Cardinal of St b. c1375 Eusebius d.
    [Show full text]