Working with Airlines II

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Working with Airlines II BUSINESS TRAVEL BUYER’S HANDBOOK 2017 AIRLINES www.businesstravelnews.com Working With Airlines II. GATHER INFORMATION Proper data can help you win discounts for city pairs, multiple destinations from one city, regionally or across your travel program. A. Obtain information about your travel program from your TMC databases, online booking systems and third- party data consolidators: 1. Top 20, at least, city pairs by segment and passenger count, including car- rier and origin and destination data. 2. Carrier spend per airline per route for the most recent 12 months. 3. Tickets and value per class of ser- vice, including full-fare economy, discounted economy, business class and first class. Know the tradeoffs in using booked, ticketed or flown data. AFTER A WAVE OF MAJOR U.S. AIRLINE CONSOLIDATION AND THE CONTINUAL While bookings data is available growth of airline alliances and joint ventures, business travel buyers today have fewer more readily and with less of a lag, it avenues to negotiate airline deals than existed a decade ago. Certainly, that doesn’t help does not have the same precision as buyers negotiating position, nor does a market where demand and load factors continue ticketed or flown data. to increase worldwide. But business travel remains a lucrative and desirable segment 4. Analyze corporate card data to find for carriers the world over, given the possibility of premium-class and other high-yield trips booked outside your TMC. travel, and airlines still will heavily compete for that business, despite the leverage that Airlines do not count those trips consolidation has delivered to them. Organizations with established airline programs toward the volume you agreed in that can prove compliance and an ability to deliver share will be in the best position to your contract to provide, but the receive those deals, and the following is a guide to help buyers develop one. volume does add to your negotiat- ing power, particularly if you’re able I. BEFORE YOU COMMIT to articulate actions you’re taking to Most corporate discount deals are measured on market share, but buyers can gain leverage minimize leakage. if they have high-yield spend like first or business class or full-fare coach available to shift B. Investigate government and indepen- to new suppliers. Airlines also desire discounted economy or lowest-logical-fare business, dent information on airlines. Perhaps providing it’s business the carrier would not receive without offering discounts. Considering an airline has low load factors on a that suppliers are consolidating, commit only to share you can manage. Many companies route your travelers fly frequently, or overcommit, and then underperformance puts programs at risk. Discount programs are perhaps another carrier has launched structured based on opportunities. Consider a few hundred thousand dollars as a minimum service on the route, allowing you to for the U.S. point of sale, though your agency can provide more exact benchmarks. If your negotiate aggressively. Be aware of volume does not meet the minimum, look into revenue- or sector-based incentive pro- airline customer service metrics. Some grams for back-end rebates, club passes, waivers and favors, upgrades and/or frequent-flyer airline or third-party providers offer status. Also look into the small-business programs some carriers offer. Some travel manage- reports on on-time performance, de- ment companies also provide their negotiated discounts to their customers, particularly layed flights and mishandled baggage. with international carriers. Determine whether human resources, frequent-flyer loyalties The U.S. Department of Transportation and other costs of implementing preferred airline agreements are worth the benefits. provides such data for domestic airlines A. Estimate your domestic and international air volume for the next year based on last through the Bureau of Transportation year’s numbers and the company’s business plan, such as mergers and acquisitions, new Statistics at bts.gov. Also investigate product lines and new locations. Consider air volume for meetings and internal trips each airline’s maintenance issues and like training. Remember that volume ultimately is determined by business dynamics the average age of its aircraft. and the economy, not the travel manager. 1. Obtain marketshare information by B. Ask frequent travelers which airlines they use and why, assess frequent-flyer member- city pair from the DOT, recogniz- ships, understand which air and ground amenities matter to travelers and determine ing that such data is free but dated willingness to support a preferred airline program. by at least a few months. Data from C. Determine the ‘value drivers’ of your organization and search for the most suitable other sources, including ARC, travel program accordingly. Make sure that the deal will satisfy your organization’s safety and agencies, consultants and other third security requirements as well. parties, can be costly. BUSINESS TRAVEL BUYER’S HANDBOOK 2017 AIRLINES www.businesstravelnews.com 2. Look closely at data for more than many airlines also contract services at headquarters. Such relationships one year to ensure you are refer- funds to offset many of those fees. ensure that changes in regional staff do encing an established trend. Look 4. Analysis of your organization’s travel not eradicate contacts. Headquarters- at different quarters of the year to patterns may present opportuni- level relationships may be limited, determine the seasonal impact, ties for citypair-specific deals rather especially for smaller travel programs. acquisition or divesture activity and than systemwide deals, but do not Many airlines conduct quarterly or one-time impacts. sacrifice overall savings for sizable monthly progress reviews while others 3. Focus on the capacity each airline citypair-specific discounts. For more will meet only once or twice per year. has in given cities and on certain than one systemwide deal, carefully Generally, more interaction is better, as routes. The difference between one analyze which airlines will maximize strong airline reps have a current un- carrier’s 60 percent market share on citypair coverage without compro- derstanding of market developments a route and another carrier’s 20 per- mising your share obligation to pro- and can share best practices regarding cent share is significant to the buyer’s vide market share to other airlines. contract management and policy. opportunity to move share. 5. Determine whether the carrier 2. TMC contacts. 4. Useful information can be obtained participates in an airline alliance. a. The TMC might have an es- from several third-party firms and Some airline partners offer joint al- tablished relationship with the from consultants performing data liance deals, while others even have airline. If so, ensure your organi- analyses with optimization model- developed antitrust-immune joint zation’s goals are compatible with ing. This will take into account both ventures, through which partners this relationship. client traffic and airline capacity and manage capacity, fares and corporate b. TMCs frequently are the primary determine the optimal airline or deals as one entity. Determine the source for your organization’s airlines to serve your travelers. magnitude of alliance relationships spending history and can be part- C. Document your plan to shift market and how it impacts the carrier’s ne- ners in negotiations. share and influence travelers’ airline gotiating leverage. Consider whether 3. Peers and consultants can provide choices. Note past successes. the airline requires an agreement benchmarking data. Get involved D. Determine how and to what degree you through the joint venture as opposed with local boards, industry groups can leverage your employees’ meetings to either an alliance or individual for buyers and sellers and network- and incentive travel. carrier agreement. ing groups to share best practices E. Airlines increasingly charge for à la 6. Note your negotiating leverage. and industry trends. carte offerings above the base fare. a. Purchasing premium-class fares C. Some organizations, especially larger Ancillaries include seat selection, on long-haul routes on which ones, take a formal approach by dis- checked bags, early boarding, Wi-Fi, multiple carriers compete for tributing requests for proposals to onboard meals and upgrades. Though passengers works in your favor. headquarters and local sales offices. many of these fees are not negotiable, Airlines know they don’t have to Include essential information only. travel buyers should attempt to capture work hard to sell economy fares Agencies and consultants can help spending through expense report- on a short-haul route on which formulate and streamline the process. ing and corporate card data to show one carrier has a monopoly. airlines the total amount spent. b. A demonstrated ability to shift IV. NEGOTIATE THE DEAL F. Compile benchmarks. Data from peers travelers to an airline makes your A. Outline the benefits of your busi- and TMCs lend perspective. company a desirable customer. ness to the airline. Typically, airline Failure to deliver on marketshare agreements are written by and for the III. GET STARTED commitments you made to car- airlines, though your legal department A. Not all business is equally attractive to riers or inability to demonstrate may seek modifications. airlines. Understand your travel pat- that your policy can shift travelers 1. Even before you issue an RFP, provide terns and find a compatible supplier. causes airlines to question your data on your organization’s traffic 1. Recognize airline network strengths: ability to deliver on commitments. patterns and spend to prospective air Short-haul versus long-haul, hub and Noncontracted airlines will take partners. Highlight areas of interest to spoke versus point to point, interna- note when they are receiving far the airline, including such high-yield tional reach versus domestic focus. below their fair share of a market, purchases as international business 2. Recognize product differences. Some as it indicates your ability to sup- class. Many airlines will require your airlines are no-frills, low-cost opera- port preferred carriers.
Recommended publications
  • How Do Airlines Perceive That Strategic Alliances Affect Their Individual Branding?
    Journal of Air Transportation Vol. 11, No. 2 -2006 HOW DO AIRLINES PERCEIVE THAT STRATEGIC ALLIANCES AFFECT THEIR INDIVIDUAL BRANDING? Konstantinos Kalligiannis Cranfield University Bedford, United Kingdom Kostas Iatrou Hellenic Aviation Society Athens, Greece Keith Mason Cranfield University Bedford, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Much research has been carried out to evaluate the impact of strategic alliance membership on the performance of airlines. However it would be of interest to identify how airlines perceive this impact in terms of branding by each of the three global alliance groupings. It is the purpose of this paper to gather the opinion of airlines, belonging to the three strategic alliance groups, on the impact that the strategic alliance brands have had on their individual brands and how do they perceive that this impact will change in the future. To achieve this, a comprehensive survey of the alliance management and marketing departments of airlines participating in the three global strategic alliances was required. The results from this survey give an indication whether the strategic airline alliances, which are often referred to as marketing agreements, enhance, damage or have no impact on the individual airline brands. Konstantinos Kalligiannis is a Ph.D. candidate at Cranfield University (on Airline Branding inconsistencies within the Airline Alliances) and holds a M.Sc. in Airport Planning and Management from Loughborough University, a M.Sc. in Air Transport Management from Cranfield University and a B.A. in Business Administration from Luton University. Konstantinos is also working as an aviation consultant and airport planner. His key areas of expertise include air traffic forecasts, airport planning, feasibility studies and business plans for start up airlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Antitrust Immunity and International Airline Alliances
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Gillespie, William; Richard, Oliver M. Working Paper Antitrust Immunity and International Airline Alliances EAG Discussion Paper, No. 11-1 Provided in Cooperation with: Economic Analysis Group (EAG), Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice Suggested Citation: Gillespie, William; Richard, Oliver M. (2011) : Antitrust Immunity and International Airline Alliances, EAG Discussion Paper, No. 11-1, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Economic Analysis Group (EAG), Washington, DC This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/202391 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu ECONOMIC ANALYSIS GROUP DISCUSSION PAPER Antitrust Immunity and International Airline Alliances by William Gillespie and Oliver M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Global Alliances to Airlines' Environmental Performance
    sustainability Article The Contribution of Global Alliances to Airlines’ Environmental Performance Belén Payán-Sánchez , Miguel Pérez-Valls * and José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda Economics and Business Department, University of Almería, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120 Almería, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 June 2019; Accepted: 22 August 2019; Published: 24 August 2019 Abstract: Global alliances have traditionally been related to improvements in the economic and operational performances of companies, particularly in the airline industry. However, we still do not know the effect of the participation in this kind of multilateral agreement on the environmental performance of airlines. The main aim of this work is to analyze whether the alliance membership of airlines has an effect upon their environmental performance, and if so, whether or not the characteristics of the global alliance, as well as the business model of the airline, may influence this relation to a greater or lesser extent. The results of regression and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) in a sample of 252 airlines (58 included in one of the three global alliances: Star Alliance, Oneworld, and SkyTeam) show a strong and inverse relationship between environmental performance and belonging to an alliance. The paper also shows empirical evidence of the influence of the business model of the airline on environmental performance. These results suggest important implications for managers facing challenges regarding sustainability. Keywords: global alliances; sustainability; environmental performance; airlines; aviation 1. Introduction The aviation sector is the fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide [1]. Many authors and corporations, such as the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Air Transport Association (IATA), agree that environmental sustainability may be achieved through external pressure with the imposition and accomplishment of different policies, regulations, taxations and other fiscal instruments [2–6].
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronological History
    A Chronological History December 2016 Pedro Heilbron, CEO of Copa Airlines, elected as new Chairman of the Star Alliance Chief Executive Board November 2016 Star Alliance Gold Track launched in Frankfurt, Star Alliance’s busiest hub October 2016 Juneyao Airlines announced as future Connecting Partner of Star Allianceseal partnership August 2016 Star Alliance adds themed itineraries to its Round the World product portfolio July 2016 Star Alliance Los Angeles lounge wins Skytrax Award for second year running Star Alliance takes ‘Best Alliance’ title at Skytrax World Airline Awards June 2016 New self-service check-in processes launched in Tokyo-Narita Star Alliance announces Jeffrey Goh will take over as Star Alliance CEO from 2017, on the retirement of Mark Schwab Swiss hosts Star Alliance Chief Executive Board meeting in Zurich. The CEOs arrive on the first passenger flight of the Bombardier C Series. Page 1 of 1 Page 2 of 2 April 2016 Star Alliance: Global travel solutions for conventions and meetings at IMEX March 2016 Star Alliance invites lounge guests to share tips via #irecommend February 2016 Star Alliance airlines launch new check-in processes at Los Angeles’ Tom Bradley International Terminal (TBIT) Star Alliance Gold Card holders enjoy free upgrades on Heathrow Express trains Star Alliance supports Ramsar’s Youth Photo Contest – Alliance’s Biosphere Connections initiative now in its ninth year January 2016 Gold Track priority at security added as a Star Alliance Gold Status benefit December 2015 Star Alliance launches Connecting
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Before Alliances, there was Pan American World Airways . and Trans World Airlines. Before the mega- Alliances, there was interlining, facilitated by IATA Like dogs marking territory, airlines around the world are sniffing each other's tail fins looking for partners." Daniel Riordan “The hardest thing in working on an alliance is to coordinate the activities of people who have different instincts and a different language, and maybe worship slightly different travel gods, to get them to work together in a culture that allows them to respect each other’s habits and convictions, and yet work productively together in an environment in which you can’t specify everything in advance.” Michael E. Levine “Beware a pact with the devil.” Martin Shugrue Airline Motivations For Alliances • the desire to achieve greater economies of scale, scope, and density; • the desire to reduce costs by consolidating redundant operations; • the need to improve revenue by reducing the level of competition wherever possible as markets are liberalized; and • the desire to skirt around the nationality rules which prohibit multinational ownership and cabotage. Intercarrier Agreements · Ticketing-and-Baggage Agreements · Joint-Fare Agreements · Reciprocal Airport Agreements · Blocked Space Relationships · Computer Reservations Systems Joint Ventures · Joint Sales Offices and Telephone Centers · E-Commerce Joint Ventures · Frequent Flyer Program Alliances · Pooling Traffic & Revenue · Code-Sharing Code Sharing The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA carrier designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoff Dixon, CEO, Qantas Airways
    A MAGAZINE FOR AIRLINE EXECUTIVES 2004 Issue No. 2 T aking your airline to new heights AN ALLIED FRONT A conversation with … Geoff Dixon, CEO, Qantas Airways INSIDE Air France and KLM form 4 Europe’s Largest Airline 18 The Evolution of Alliances A Conversation with oneworld, SkyTeam 26 and Star Alliance proven Taking your airline to new heights 2004 Issue No. 2 leadership. Editors in Chief an affiliate of Sabre Holdings Corporation. ©2004 Sabre Inc. All rights reserved. Stephani Hawkins B. Scott Hunt 3150 Sabre Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 Sabre Airline Solutions and the Sabre Airline Solutions logo are trademarks and/or service marks of www.sabreairlinesolutions.com Designer James Frisbie Contributors Venkat Anganagari, Randal Beasley, Hans Belle, Nejib Ben-Khedher, Kathy Benson, Jack Burkholder, Cameron Curtis, Sally deFina, Karen Dielman, James Filsinger, Brenda Gale, Greg Gilchrist, Gretchen Greene, Jim Haley, Glen Harvell, Kathryn Hayden, Vicki Hummel, Carla Jensen, Craig Lindsey, Patrice Lipson, George Lynch, Michael McCurdy, Matt McLellan, Mona Naguib, Nancy Ornelas, Jenny Rizzolo, Dave Roberts, Sanjay Sathe, Shari Stiborek, Renzo Vaccari, Elayne Vick. Awards It’s time for all-out innovation. And it’s time for proven leadership. Mission-criti- 2004 International Association of cal areas require time-tested solutions. Longer than any other company, we’ve Business Communicators Bronze Quill and Silver Quill. pushed technology forward to deliver vital systems airlines need to stay ahead, 2004 Awards for Publication Excellence. to make the impossible practical. Reader Inquiries If you have questions about this Working closely with carriers, we’ve developed a portfolio of flexible, integrated publication or suggested topics for future articles, please send an e-mail solutions that can optimize operations of all airlines — any size, any business to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Alliances
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
    [Show full text]
  • Lottery Registration for 2020 Empire State Building Run-Up Presented by Turkish Airlines Powered by the Challenged Athletes Foundation Opens on January 7, 2020
    Lottery Registration for 2020 Empire State Building Run-Up Presented by Turkish Airlines Powered by the Challenged Athletes Foundation Opens on January 7, 2020 The 43rd Annual Event is Scheduled for Tuesday, May 12, 2020 New York, NY – December 18, 2019— Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE: ESRT) today announced that lottery registration for the 2020 Empire State Building Run-Up (ESBRU) Presented by Turkish Airlines and Powered by the Challenged Athletes Foundation, will open on Tuesday, January 7, 2020, at 12:00 p.m. EST and close on Sunday, February 9, 2020, at 11:59 p.m. EST. The 43rd annual ESBRU will be held on Tuesday, May 12, 2020, at 8:00 p.m. EST. Runners who apply to climb the 1,576 steps and 86 floors of the World’s Most Famous Building will be notified of their race status on February 12, 2020. Interested runners can register online at http://www.nycruns.com/esb. Of the thousands of runners from around the world who enter the ESBRU lottery, a select few will have the opportunity to participate. Race entry is $125 per applicant and will only be charged if the applicant is randomly selected to participate. “The Empire State Building Run-Up is the world’s most iconic tower race and the only athletic challenge that takes place at the World’s Most Famous Building,” said Anthony E. Malkin, Chairman and CEO of ESRT. “We invite athletes from across the globe to compete in this bucket-list competition.” Turkish Airlines, Turkey's national flag carrier and the airline that flies to more countries and international destinations than any other airline, returns for its third year as presenting sponsor of the Run-Up.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Guide 2017/2018 Star Alliance Tm
    REFERENCE GUIDE 2017/2018 STAR ALLIANCE TM FOR EMPLOYEES OF STAR ALLIANCE MEMBER CARRIERS 21st Edition, November 2017 WELCOME WELCOME TO THE 2017/18 EDITION OF THE STAR ALLIANCE REFERENCE GUIDE This guide is intended to provide a single reference point for a wealth of detail about the services offered by the 28 Star Alliance member airlines. It gives an overview of each airline’s policies (for example on baggage) and services (such as frequent flyer programmes and lounges) as well as information and maps for the main Star Alliance hub airports. The aim is to help all Star Alliance member airline employees to assist customers who are travelling on any Star Alliance flight. Information changes regularly, so please continue to consult your airline’s own information systems for changes and updates, as well as for operational information and procedures. We are planning a future electronic version of this guide with more frequent updates. Please let us have your feedback and comments on the Reference Guide at [email protected]. Thank you, Star Alliance Internal Communications 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW AIRPORTS INFORMATION 78 Welcome 2 Priority Baggage Handling 79 Greetings from Star Alliance Headquarters 4 Free Checked Baggage Allowances 80 Vision / Mission 5 Special Checked Baggage 86 Facts & Figures 6 Carry-on Baggage Policy 151 Connecting Partners 10 Irregular Operations Handling 152 Interline E-Ticketing FAQ - Airports 155 GENERAL INFORMATION 12 Customer Benefits 13 Frequent Flyer Programmes 14 LOUNGE INFORMATION 157 Reservation
    [Show full text]
  • Geoff Dixon, CEO, Qantas Airways
    A MAGAZINE FOR AIRLINE EXECUTIVES 2004 Issue No. 2 T a k i n g y o u r a i r l i n e t o n e w h e i g h t s AN ALLIED FRON T A conversation with … Geoff Dixon, CEO, Qantas Airways INSID E Air France and KLM form 4 Europe’s Largest Airline 18 The Evolution of Alliances A Conversation with oneworld, SkyTeam 26 and Star Alliance © 2009 Sabre Inc. All rights reserved. [email protected] company company tainly present a challenge for an industry so the smooth flow of passengers between significant impact on airline profitability. affected by the volatility of the global econo- alliance partners. Because airline planning is often a matter of my. But, by developing new practices in the Competitive positioning for an airline seeking profitability, shifts in demand should Aligning the Alliance untapped areas of planning and scheduling, generally involves assigning resources to mar- affect the relative attractiveness of markets revenue management, passenger service, and kets to maximize expected profit. Each carrier and change individual airline plans. Timetable operations, airlines can further take advantage in the alliance has the same objective and con- coordination helps maximize the benefits of of alliance membership. straints. Without accurately accounting for the demand share shift created by the alliance. By more tightly aligning their operations in areas such as planning and alliance traffic, an individual airline could allo- Relatively small changes in the timetables of scheduling, revenue management, and passenger service and operations, Planning and Scheduling cate an aircraft with insufficient capacity, all alliance carriers will increase the quality of individual members of an airline alliance can further cut costs as well as To be most effective in schedule planning, air- thereby generating passenger spill in a given alliance service.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Global Airline Alliances As a Strategy for International Network Development by Antonio Tugores-García
    Analysis of Global Airline Alliances as a Strategy for International Network Development by Antonio Tugores-García M.S., Civil Engineering, Enginyer de Camins, Canals i Ports Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2008 Submitted to the MIT Engineering Systems Division and the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Technology and Policy and Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2012 © 2012 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved Signature of Author__________________________________________________________________________________ Antonio Tugores-García Department of Engineering Systems Division Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics May 14, 2012 Certified by___________________________________________________________________________________________ Peter P. Belobaba Principal Research Scientist, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by__________________________________________________________________________________________ Joel P. Clark Professor of Material Systems and Engineering Systems Acting Director, Technology and Policy Program Accepted by___________________________________________________________________________________________ Eytan H. Modiano Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee 1 2 Analysis of Global Airline Alliances as a Strategy for International Network Development by Antonio Tugores-García
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Guide 2016/2017
    REFERENCE GUIDE 2016/2017 FOR EMPLOYEES OF STAR ALLIANCE MEMBER CARRIERS 20th Edition, November 2016 WELCOME WELCOME TO THE 2016 EDITION OF THE STAR ALLIANCE REFERENCE GUIDE This guide is intended to provide a single reference point for a wealth of detail about the services offered by the 28 Star Alliance member airlines. It gives an overview of each airline’s policies (for example on baggage) and services (such as frequent flyer programmes and lounges) as well as information and maps for the main Star Alliance hub airports. The aim is to help all Star Alliance member airline employees to assist customers who are travelling on any Star Alliance flight. Information changes regularly, so please continue to consult your airline’s own information systems for changes and updates, as well as for operational information and procedures. We are planning a future electronic version of this guide with more frequent updates. Please let us have your feedback and comments on the Reference Guide at [email protected]. Thank you, Star Alliance Internal Communications 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW AIRPORTS INFORMATION 74 Welcome 2 Priority Baggage Handling 75 Greetings from Star Alliance Headquarters 4 Free Checked Baggage Allowances 76 Vision / Mission 5 Special Checked Baggage 81 Facts & Figures 6 Carry-on Baggage Policy 141 Irregular Operations Handling 142 GENERAL INFORMATION 10 Interline E-Ticketing FAQ - Airports 145 Customer Benefits 11 Frequent Flyer Programmes 15 Reservation Call Centres 19 LOUNGE INFORMATION 147 Reservations Special Service
    [Show full text]