Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 213/Thursday, November 3, 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 213/Thursday, November 3, 2016 76800 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 213 / Thursday, November 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION basic ancillary services to consumers at carriers that account for at least 0.5 all points of sale. The remaining topics percent of the domestic scheduled Office of the Secretary discussed in the 2014 notice of passenger revenue to file reports for the proposed rulemaking (e.g., customer on-time performance and mishandled 14 CFR Parts 234, 244, 250, 255, 256, service commitments by large ticket baggage for their flights and to post the 257, 259, and 399 agents, prohibition on post-purchase on-time performance of their flights on [Docket No. DOT–OST–2014–0056] price increases for ancillary services) their Web sites if they have Web sites will be addressed in another final rule marketing air transportation to the RIN 2105–AE11 that the Department plans to issue at a public. This is an expansion of the later date. reporting carrier pool from its previous Enhancing Airline Passenger DATES: This final rule is effective threshold of at least one percent of the Protections III December 5, 2016. domestic scheduled passenger revenue. AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Similarly, an amendment to 14 CFR part Department of Transportation (DOT). Clereece Kroha or Blane A. Workie, 250 will expand the reporting carrier ACTION: Final rule. Office of the Assistant General Counsel pool for reporting oversales data. for Aviation Enforcement and In addition, this rule amends parts SUMMARY: The Department of Proceedings, U.S. Department of 234 and 250 to require all reporting Transportation is issuing a third Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. carriers that market code-share flights ‘‘Enhancing Airline Passenger SE., Washington, DC 20590, 202–366– operated by another carrier to file Protections’’ final rule to enhance 9342 (phone), 202–366–7152 (fax), separate reports for on-time protections for air travelers and to [email protected] (email) and performance, mishandled baggage, and improve the air travel environment as [email protected]. oversales data for those code-share follows: Expanding the pool of reporting SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: flights. carriers for service quality data; With respect to disclosing code-share requiring reporting carriers to include Executive Summary arrangements, this rule amends 14 CFR service quality data for their domestic (1) Purpose of the Regulatory Action part 257 to codify a statutory scheduled flights operated by their This final rule enhances the requirement that code-share code-share partners; enhancing the performance quality information arrangements in online itinerary search Department’s code-share disclosure collected by the Department and made results must be disclosed on the first regulation to codify the statutory available to the public by expanding the display following the search and in a requirement that carriers and ticket reporting carrier pool and requiring format that is easily accessible to agents must disclose any code-share performance data for code-share flights consumers. arrangements on their Web sites on the marketed by reporting carriers. These Finally, this rule adds 14 CFR part first display presented in response to a actions will ensure that smaller U.S. 256 that prohibits undisclosed bias by search of a requested itinerary for each carriers’ performance records are carriers and ticket agents when itinerary involving a code-share included in the monthly Air Travel displaying fare, schedule or availability operation; and prohibiting undisclosed Consumer Reports and that code-share information online that includes biasing based on carrier identity by flights’ performance data will be multiple carriers. carriers and ticket agents in any reflected in their marketing carriers’ electronic displays of the fare, schedule records and rankings. This rule will also (3) Costs and Benefits or availability information of multiple enhance information disclosure to air carriers. The amendments to the travel consumers by codifying the The Regulatory Impact Analysis reporting requirements in this rule will statutory requirement regarding estimates the total discounted costs, ensure that the Department obtains and disclosing code-share arrangements in which could be monetized over a 10- provides to the public expanded and online schedule displays, and year period. Cost could only be robustly enhanced service quality data from the prohibiting undisclosed bias when estimated for the reporting airlines. The provision to strengthen the displaying air travel itinerary search requirements, and may not include Department’s code-share disclosure rule results by carriers and ticket agents. some other potential costs which the will also enhance air travel consumer These actions are taken under the Department expects to have minimal protection. Additionally, this final rule statutory authorities for the Department impact. The costs of the reporting corrects certain drafting errors and to collect and collate transportation requirements are estimated to total makes minor changes to the information that will contribute to the $7.74 million over ten years, which Department’s second Enhancing Airline improvement of the transportation amounts to an annualized cost of $0.96 Passenger Protections rule to better system of the United States (49 U.S.C. million, when discounted using a seven reflect the Department’s intent. Other 329 and sections 41708 and 41709), and percent rate. Given these estimates, the topics covered by the proposed rule that to prohibit unfair and deceptive rule is not expected to be economically are not addressed by this final rule will practices and unfair methods of significant. The benefits could not be be addressed in two separate competition in the provision of air quantified and monetized with rulemakings. Specifically, the transportation (49 U.S.C. 41712). reasonable accuracy for the rule. Department will be issuing a Benefits were evaluated qualitatively for Supplemental Notice of Proposed (2) Summary of Major Provisions all provisions. A summary of this rule’s Rulemaking (SNPRM) to seek additional In this final rule, the Department benefits and costs is presented in the information on the disclosure of fees for amends 14 CFR part 234 to require U.S. following table. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:05 Nov 02, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03NOR3.SGM 03NOR3 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 213 / Thursday, November 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 76801 SUMMARY OF RULE’S BENEFITS AND COSTS Ten year costs Major provision Benefits (Discounted 7%) Additional Reporting Carriers Improved ability of consumers, especially in rural com- Costs to carriers to report the information estimated at for Service Quality Data. munities, to examine the past performance of flights. $7.74 million (10-year cost discounted at 7 percent).* Potential improved Department enforcement due to Costs for some carriers to train employees and costs more complete picture of industry performance. to consumers to use the information are not esti- mated. Data Reporting for Domestic Improved ability of consumers, especially in rural com- See above. Code-Share Partner Oper- munities, to examine the past performance of flights. ations. Potential for improved Department enforcement due to more complete picture of industry performance. Transparency in Display of Helps ensure that all consumers purchasing via tele- Up-front programming costs to redesign mobile Code-Share Operations as phone, mobile websites, and applications are aware websites and applications to incorporate the code- Required by 49 U.S.C. of code-share arrangements at beginning of booking share disclosure information for those carriers which 41712(c). process; some consumers may avoid time for addi- had not interpreted statue as applying to mobile tional flight searches. websites and mobile applications; potential costs for telephone reservations. Prohibition of Undisclosed Decrease in potential distortion in market of consumer Based on assumptions with uncertainties, programing Bias. unknowingly choosing non-optional flights because of costs to add statement(s) for some carriers and trav- display order. el agents are estimated to range from $947,000 to $2.8 million (undiscounted). * Costs were estimated for these two provisions together as their impacts are inter-related. Background undisclosed carrier display bias by large Notice of Proposed Rulemaking On May 23, 2014, the U.S. ticket agents; (9) Prohibiting post (SNPRM) addressing disclosure of Department of Transportation (DOT) purchase price increases for certain certain ancillary service fee information issued a notice of proposed rulemaking ancillary services. to consumers in all channels of sales (NPRM), 79 FR 29970, to improve the In response to this NPRM, the (GDS issue). See RIN 2105–AE56. We air travel environment of consumers Department received over 750 believe the SNPRM is necessary in light based on its statutory authority to comments from the following: U.S. air of the complexity of the issues and prohibit unfair or deceptive practices in carriers and U.S. air carrier associations; additional considerations identified by air transportation, 49 U.S.C. 41712. This foreign air carriers and foreign air comments submitted on the NPRM. The NPRM addressed several carrier associations; consumer rights NPRM also proposed revisions to recommendations to the Department advocacy
Recommended publications
  • IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 of 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report
    IATA CLEARING HOUSE PAGE 1 OF 21 2021-09-08 14:22 EST Member List Report AGREEMENT : Standard PERIOD: P01 September 2021 MEMBER CODE MEMBER NAME ZONE STATUS CATEGORY XB-B72 "INTERAVIA" LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY B Live Associate Member FV-195 "ROSSIYA AIRLINES" JSC D Live IATA Airline 2I-681 21 AIR LLC C Live ACH XD-A39 617436 BC LTD DBA FREIGHTLINK EXPRESS C Live ACH 4O-837 ABC AEROLINEAS S.A. DE C.V. B Suspended Non-IATA Airline M3-549 ABSA - AEROLINHAS BRASILEIRAS S.A. C Live ACH XB-B11 ACCELYA AMERICA B Live Associate Member XB-B81 ACCELYA FRANCE S.A.S D Live Associate Member XB-B05 ACCELYA MIDDLE EAST FZE B Live Associate Member XB-B40 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS AMERICAS INC B Live Associate Member XB-B52 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS INDIA LTD. D Live Associate Member XB-B28 ACCELYA SOLUTIONS UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B70 ACCELYA UK LIMITED A Live Associate Member XB-B86 ACCELYA WORLD, S.L.U D Live Associate Member 9B-450 ACCESRAIL AND PARTNER RAILWAYS D Live Associate Member XB-280 ACCOUNTING CENTRE OF CHINA AVIATION B Live Associate Member XB-M30 ACNA D Live Associate Member XB-B31 ADB SAFEGATE AIRPORT SYSTEMS UK LTD. A Live Associate Member JP-165 ADRIA AIRWAYS D.O.O. D Suspended Non-IATA Airline A3-390 AEGEAN AIRLINES S.A. D Live IATA Airline KH-687 AEKO KULA LLC C Live ACH EI-053 AER LINGUS LIMITED B Live IATA Airline XB-B74 AERCAP HOLDINGS NV B Live Associate Member 7T-144 AERO EXPRESS DEL ECUADOR - TRANS AM B Live Non-IATA Airline XB-B13 AERO INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY B Live Associate Member P5-845 AERO REPUBLICA S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Airlines Perceive That Strategic Alliances Affect Their Individual Branding?
    Journal of Air Transportation Vol. 11, No. 2 -2006 HOW DO AIRLINES PERCEIVE THAT STRATEGIC ALLIANCES AFFECT THEIR INDIVIDUAL BRANDING? Konstantinos Kalligiannis Cranfield University Bedford, United Kingdom Kostas Iatrou Hellenic Aviation Society Athens, Greece Keith Mason Cranfield University Bedford, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Much research has been carried out to evaluate the impact of strategic alliance membership on the performance of airlines. However it would be of interest to identify how airlines perceive this impact in terms of branding by each of the three global alliance groupings. It is the purpose of this paper to gather the opinion of airlines, belonging to the three strategic alliance groups, on the impact that the strategic alliance brands have had on their individual brands and how do they perceive that this impact will change in the future. To achieve this, a comprehensive survey of the alliance management and marketing departments of airlines participating in the three global strategic alliances was required. The results from this survey give an indication whether the strategic airline alliances, which are often referred to as marketing agreements, enhance, damage or have no impact on the individual airline brands. Konstantinos Kalligiannis is a Ph.D. candidate at Cranfield University (on Airline Branding inconsistencies within the Airline Alliances) and holds a M.Sc. in Airport Planning and Management from Loughborough University, a M.Sc. in Air Transport Management from Cranfield University and a B.A. in Business Administration from Luton University. Konstantinos is also working as an aviation consultant and airport planner. His key areas of expertise include air traffic forecasts, airport planning, feasibility studies and business plans for start up airlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Week & Space Technology
    STARTS AFTER PAGE 34 Using AI To Boost How Emirates Is Extending ATM Efficiency Maintenance Intervals ™ $14.95 JANUARY 13-26, 2020 2020 THE YEAR OF SUSTAINABILITY RICH MEDIA EXCLUSIVE Digital Edition Copyright Notice The content contained in this digital edition (“Digital Material”), as well as its selection and arrangement, is owned by Informa. and its affiliated companies, licensors, and suppliers, and is protected by their respective copyright, trademark and other proprietary rights. Upon payment of the subscription price, if applicable, you are hereby authorized to view, download, copy, and print Digital Material solely for your own personal, non-commercial use, provided that by doing any of the foregoing, you acknowledge that (i) you do not and will not acquire any ownership rights of any kind in the Digital Material or any portion thereof, (ii) you must preserve all copyright and other proprietary notices included in any downloaded Digital Material, and (iii) you must comply in all respects with the use restrictions set forth below and in the Informa Privacy Policy and the Informa Terms of Use (the “Use Restrictions”), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Any use not in accordance with, and any failure to comply fully with, the Use Restrictions is expressly prohibited by law, and may result in severe civil and criminal penalties. Violators will be prosecuted to the maximum possible extent. You may not modify, publish, license, transmit (including by way of email, facsimile or other electronic means), transfer, sell, reproduce (including by copying or posting on any network computer), create derivative works from, display, store, or in any way exploit, broadcast, disseminate or distribute, in any format or media of any kind, any of the Digital Material, in whole or in part, without the express prior written consent of Informa.
    [Show full text]
  • Antitrust Immunity and International Airline Alliances
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Gillespie, William; Richard, Oliver M. Working Paper Antitrust Immunity and International Airline Alliances EAG Discussion Paper, No. 11-1 Provided in Cooperation with: Economic Analysis Group (EAG), Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice Suggested Citation: Gillespie, William; Richard, Oliver M. (2011) : Antitrust Immunity and International Airline Alliances, EAG Discussion Paper, No. 11-1, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Economic Analysis Group (EAG), Washington, DC This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/202391 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu ECONOMIC ANALYSIS GROUP DISCUSSION PAPER Antitrust Immunity and International Airline Alliances by William Gillespie and Oliver M.
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Airlines II
    BUSINESS TRAVEL BUYER’S HANDBOOK 2017 AIRLINES www.businesstravelnews.com Working With Airlines II. GATHER INFORMATION Proper data can help you win discounts for city pairs, multiple destinations from one city, regionally or across your travel program. A. Obtain information about your travel program from your TMC databases, online booking systems and third- party data consolidators: 1. Top 20, at least, city pairs by segment and passenger count, including car- rier and origin and destination data. 2. Carrier spend per airline per route for the most recent 12 months. 3. Tickets and value per class of ser- vice, including full-fare economy, discounted economy, business class and first class. Know the tradeoffs in using booked, ticketed or flown data. AFTER A WAVE OF MAJOR U.S. AIRLINE CONSOLIDATION AND THE CONTINUAL While bookings data is available growth of airline alliances and joint ventures, business travel buyers today have fewer more readily and with less of a lag, it avenues to negotiate airline deals than existed a decade ago. Certainly, that doesn’t help does not have the same precision as buyers negotiating position, nor does a market where demand and load factors continue ticketed or flown data. to increase worldwide. But business travel remains a lucrative and desirable segment 4. Analyze corporate card data to find for carriers the world over, given the possibility of premium-class and other high-yield trips booked outside your TMC. travel, and airlines still will heavily compete for that business, despite the leverage that Airlines do not count those trips consolidation has delivered to them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Global Alliances to Airlines' Environmental Performance
    sustainability Article The Contribution of Global Alliances to Airlines’ Environmental Performance Belén Payán-Sánchez , Miguel Pérez-Valls * and José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda Economics and Business Department, University of Almería, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120 Almería, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 June 2019; Accepted: 22 August 2019; Published: 24 August 2019 Abstract: Global alliances have traditionally been related to improvements in the economic and operational performances of companies, particularly in the airline industry. However, we still do not know the effect of the participation in this kind of multilateral agreement on the environmental performance of airlines. The main aim of this work is to analyze whether the alliance membership of airlines has an effect upon their environmental performance, and if so, whether or not the characteristics of the global alliance, as well as the business model of the airline, may influence this relation to a greater or lesser extent. The results of regression and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) in a sample of 252 airlines (58 included in one of the three global alliances: Star Alliance, Oneworld, and SkyTeam) show a strong and inverse relationship between environmental performance and belonging to an alliance. The paper also shows empirical evidence of the influence of the business model of the airline on environmental performance. These results suggest important implications for managers facing challenges regarding sustainability. Keywords: global alliances; sustainability; environmental performance; airlines; aviation 1. Introduction The aviation sector is the fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide [1]. Many authors and corporations, such as the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Air Transport Association (IATA), agree that environmental sustainability may be achieved through external pressure with the imposition and accomplishment of different policies, regulations, taxations and other fiscal instruments [2–6].
    [Show full text]
  • Information on Airline Fees for Optional Services
    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Requesters September 2017 COMMERCIAL AVIATION Information on Airline Fees for Optional Services GAO-17-756 September 2017 COMMERCIAL AVIATION Information on Airline Fees for Optional Services Highlights of GAO-17-756, a report to congressional requesters Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found Since 2008, U.S passenger airlines Since 2010, selected U.S. airlines have introduced a variety of new fees for have increasingly charged fees for optional services and increased some existing fees. For example, each of the 11 optional services that were previously U.S. airlines that GAO examined introduced fees for “preferred” seating, which included in the price of a ticket, such may include additional legroom or a seat closer to the front of the economy as checked baggage or seat selection. cabin. Some of these airlines have also introduced new fees for other optional Consumer advocates have raised services, such as fees for carry-on baggage and priority boarding. Since 2010, questions about the transparency of many of the selected airlines have also increased existing fees for some optional these fees and their associated rules. services, including fees for checked baggage and for changing or cancelling a In April 2011, DOT issued a final rule reservation. From 2010 to 2016, U.S. airlines’ revenues from these two fees— requiring, among other things, that the only optional service fees for which revenues are separately reported to the certain U.S. and foreign airlines disclose information about optional Department of Transportation (DOT)—increased from $6.3 billion in 2010 to $7.1 service fees on their websites.
    [Show full text]
  • ATIS01) for Discussion, Consensus, and Acceptance by the Industry
    ATPCO TRAVEL INDUSTRY STANDARD ATIS-01 The Standard for Standards An industry foundation for innovating at scale Version 1.0, 29 May 2020 atpco.net ATIS-01 | The Standard for Standards Published 29 May 2020 The information contained in this document is the property of ATPCO. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means; mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of ATPCO. Under the law, copying includes translating into another language or format. Legal action will be taken against any infringement Copyright © 2020 by ATPCO. All rights reserved. 2 29 May 2020 ATIS-01 | The Standard for Standards Contents About this document .................................................................................................................................. 4 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Document Scope ............................................................................................................................ 5 3. Terms and Definitions ................................................................................................................... 6 4. ATPCO’s Standards Approach ..................................................................................................... 9 4.1. The Purpose of Standards ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annex2: Glossary PDF 339Kb
    Global Report 2015 A business, financial and sustainability overview Annex 2_Glossary 142 Amadeus Global Report 2015 Annex 2_Glossary Annex 2_Glossary Amadeus Global Report 2015 143 Ancillary services: additional services provided CMMI: Capability Maturity Model Integration, a process A to customers beyond the ticket. Typical examples improvement training and appraisal programme used A4A: Airlines For America of airline ancillary services include extra baggage, to guide process improvement across a project, division priority seating, catering on board, etc. or an entire organisation. AACO: Arab Air Carrier Organisation APAC: Asia-Pacific CNMV: Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores, ACH: Airlines Clearing House API: Application Programming Interface, a language that the Spanish Securities Market Regulator. It is the agency ACO: Amadeus Commercial Organisation enables communication between computer programs. in charge of supervising and inspecting the Spanish Adjusted EPS (earnings per share): EPS corresponding stock markets and the activities of all the participants ASTA: American Society of Travel Agents to the adjusted profit for the year attributable to the in these markets. parent company. Calculated based on weighted average ATOC: Association of Train Operating Companies Code sharing: an aviation business arrangement outstanding shares less weighted average treasury where two or more airlines share the same flight, shares of the year. improving airlines’ network capacity and efficiency. Adjusted profit: the profit for the year adjusted
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronological History
    A Chronological History December 2016 Pedro Heilbron, CEO of Copa Airlines, elected as new Chairman of the Star Alliance Chief Executive Board November 2016 Star Alliance Gold Track launched in Frankfurt, Star Alliance’s busiest hub October 2016 Juneyao Airlines announced as future Connecting Partner of Star Allianceseal partnership August 2016 Star Alliance adds themed itineraries to its Round the World product portfolio July 2016 Star Alliance Los Angeles lounge wins Skytrax Award for second year running Star Alliance takes ‘Best Alliance’ title at Skytrax World Airline Awards June 2016 New self-service check-in processes launched in Tokyo-Narita Star Alliance announces Jeffrey Goh will take over as Star Alliance CEO from 2017, on the retirement of Mark Schwab Swiss hosts Star Alliance Chief Executive Board meeting in Zurich. The CEOs arrive on the first passenger flight of the Bombardier C Series. Page 1 of 1 Page 2 of 2 April 2016 Star Alliance: Global travel solutions for conventions and meetings at IMEX March 2016 Star Alliance invites lounge guests to share tips via #irecommend February 2016 Star Alliance airlines launch new check-in processes at Los Angeles’ Tom Bradley International Terminal (TBIT) Star Alliance Gold Card holders enjoy free upgrades on Heathrow Express trains Star Alliance supports Ramsar’s Youth Photo Contest – Alliance’s Biosphere Connections initiative now in its ninth year January 2016 Gold Track priority at security added as a Star Alliance Gold Status benefit December 2015 Star Alliance launches Connecting
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Before Alliances, there was Pan American World Airways . and Trans World Airlines. Before the mega- Alliances, there was interlining, facilitated by IATA Like dogs marking territory, airlines around the world are sniffing each other's tail fins looking for partners." Daniel Riordan “The hardest thing in working on an alliance is to coordinate the activities of people who have different instincts and a different language, and maybe worship slightly different travel gods, to get them to work together in a culture that allows them to respect each other’s habits and convictions, and yet work productively together in an environment in which you can’t specify everything in advance.” Michael E. Levine “Beware a pact with the devil.” Martin Shugrue Airline Motivations For Alliances • the desire to achieve greater economies of scale, scope, and density; • the desire to reduce costs by consolidating redundant operations; • the need to improve revenue by reducing the level of competition wherever possible as markets are liberalized; and • the desire to skirt around the nationality rules which prohibit multinational ownership and cabotage. Intercarrier Agreements · Ticketing-and-Baggage Agreements · Joint-Fare Agreements · Reciprocal Airport Agreements · Blocked Space Relationships · Computer Reservations Systems Joint Ventures · Joint Sales Offices and Telephone Centers · E-Commerce Joint Ventures · Frequent Flyer Program Alliances · Pooling Traffic & Revenue · Code-Sharing Code Sharing The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA carrier designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
    [Show full text]
  • Loyalty Programs: the Vital Safety Feature for Airlines to Survive COVID-19
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/2516-8142.htm Airline loyalty Loyalty programs: the vital programs safety feature for airlines to survive COVID-19 Manuel E. Pascual Chaplin School of Hospitality and Tourism, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA, and Received 9 March 2021 Revised 13 April 2021 Lisa Nicole Cain Accepted 14 April 2021 Hospitality and Tourism Management, Florida International University Biscayne Bay Campus, North Miami, Florida, USA Abstract Purpose – The airline industry has been severely impacted by COVID-19 due to widespread travel restrictions. Its current response is crucial to ensure continued operations after the global pandemic is resolved. One resource the airlines are leveraging is loyalty programs. This study aims to examine the viability of leveraging loyalty programs in times of crisis. Design/methodology/approach – This study employs a case study methodology to examine how one company, American Airlines, has used its loyalty program to survive a pandemic and alleviate the financial costs associated with limited and restricted travel. Findings – American Airlines’ AAdvantage loyalty program structure may be used as a benchmark to understand how airlines can anchor their loyalty base to reinvigorate travel interest and use these programs as safeguards in critical instances that may arise in the future. Research limitations/implications – The case was bound by the fact that the pandemic was still a threat during the time of analysis. The findings of this case study go beyond the airline industry and may inform other hospitality and tourism organizations on the benefits of loyalty programs in times of financial distress.
    [Show full text]