Star Alliance Ambassadors Club Star Alliance News & Updates (Q3-2015)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Star Alliance Ambassadors Club Star Alliance News & Updates (Q3-2015) Star Alliance Ambassadors Club Star Alliance News & Updates (Q3-2015) Star Alliance Switzerland Updated: 18AUG2015 Star Alliance Confidential Index 1. Star Alliance launches RTW fare in Premium Economy 2. Avianca Brasil joins Star Alliance 3. Star Alliance LAX Lounge wins Skytrax Award 4. Star Alliance named best airline alliance at Australian Business Traveller Awards 5. Summary / Q&A Star Alliance Switzerland Page 2 1 Star Alliance launches RTW fare in Premium Economy Star Alliance Switzerland Page 3 1 Star Alliance launches RTW fare in Premium Economy FRANKFURT, July 29th - The Star Alliance Round-the-World (RTW) fare has been expanded to include travel in Premium Economy Class in three mileage bands: 29,000, 34,000 or 39,000 miles. The new fare can now be booked for travel in the Premium Economy cabins on the following airlines: Air Canada, Air China, Air New Zealand, ANA, EVA Air, Lufthansa, LOT Polish Airlines, SAS, Singapore Airlines, THAI and Turkish Airlines. To provide customers with full flexibility, itineraries may include any other Star Alliance member airlines as well. On flights where Premium Economy Class is not offered, travellers will be accommodated in Economy Class. Star Alliance Switzerland Page 4 2 Avianca Brasil joins Star Alliance Star Alliance Switzerland Page 5 2 Avianca Brasil joins Star Alliance SAO PAULO, Brazil, July 22 - Avianca Brasil was welcomed to the Star Alliance network at a special ceremony held at Guarulhos International Airport on July 22, adding 15 new unique destinations in the Brazilian market. With this addition, the Star Alliance network grows to serve 1,330 destinations across 192 countries, served by more than 18,500 daily flights. Avianca Brasil is the fastest growing airline in Brazil. From 2010 to 2014 it increased its market share by 2.6% to 8.3%. In total 13 member carriers (Air Canada, Air China, Avianca, Avianca in Brazil, Copa Airlines, Ethiopian Airlines, Lufthansa, Singapore Airlines, South African Airways, SWISS, TAP, Turkish Airlines and United) now serve Brazil, a larger number than any other alliance. Avianca Brasil flies under the Avianca logo and livery. Its two-letter IATA code is O6. Star Alliance Switzerland Page 6 3 Star Alliance LAX Lounge wins Skytrax Award Star Alliance Switzerland Page 7 3 Star Alliance LAX Lounge wins Skytrax Award The Star Alliance Lounge in the Tom Bradley International Terminal (TBIT) of Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) has been voted best Alliance Lounge by Skytrax. Developed and managed by member carrier Air New Zealand, the LAX lounge features different experience zones to accommodate the various passenger needs, ranging from social gatherings to quiet time away from home. Accepting the award, Justin Erbacci, Vice President Customer Experience and Technology, Star Alliance, said: “This is a fantastic award for us to receive. It once again proves that by working together as an Alliance we can offer products which are highly appreciated by customers. In the case of the LAX Lounge, it underscores the positive feedback which we have been receiving since its opening in 2013." Star Alliance Switzerland Page 8 4 Star Alliance named best airline alliance at Australian Business Traveller Awards Star Alliance Switzerland Page 9 4 Star Alliance named best airline alliance at Australian Business Traveller Awards SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA – August 4th, 2015 – Star Alliance, the world’s longest serving and most comprehensive airline alliance, has been named Best Airline Alliance by Australian Business Traveller, Asia- Pacific's leading website for business travellers and frequent flyers. Australian Business Traveller Editor David Flynn said the inaugural awards program recognised "trend-setters and game-changers in the highly- competitive business travel market". “With 28 member airlines under its wing, Star Alliance can take business travellers almost everywhere they need to go," said Flynn. "Our readers especially value unique benefits such as the ability to use frequent flyer points or miles to upgrade across all member airlines. Currently 10 Star Alliance member airlines operate services to Australia, A number of offline members are also active in the market. Star Alliance Switzerland Page 10 Summary – Q&A Star Alliance Switzerland Page 11.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 15: International Insolvency Law in the United States: Opportunities and Limits
    Chapter 15: International Insolvency Law in the United States: Opportunities and Limits International Insolvency Institute 19th Annual Conference Barcelona, Spain June 2019 quinn emanuel urquhart & sullivan, llp | trial lawyers Brussels | Chicago | Hamburg | Hong Kong | Houston | London | Los Angeles | Mannheim | Moscow Munich | New York | Paris | San Francisco | Seattle | Silicon Valley | Sydney | Tokyo | Washington, DC | Zurich CHAPTER 15: OVERVIEW ▪ Purpose • “[T]o provide effective mechanisms for dealing with cases of cross-border insolvency, ” including to – Facilitate cooperation between U.S. and foreign courts, debtors, creditors and trustees – Offer greater legal certainty for trade and investment; – Promote fair and efficient administration of cross-border insolvencies, protecting the interests of all interested parties (creditors and debtors alike); – Protect and maximize of the value of the debtor’s assets; and – Facilitate of the rescue of financially troubled businesses ▪ Potential Relief – Pre-Recognition – upon a showing of urgent need, the Court may grant, among other relief, ▪ Temporary stay of execution on assets (pending a determination on recognition) – Recognition –upon recognition of the foreign proceeding, the Court may grant, among other relief ▪ The stay of any actions against the debtor and of any attempt to execute on the debtor’s assets; ▪ Entrustment of assets; and ▪ Discovery ▪ Limits • Chapter 15 is an ancillary proceeding, and the Chapter 15 Court will generally not contravene an order of the foreign tribunal handling the primary bankruptcy proceeding Mediation Privilege 2 ORO NEGRO: TESTING THE BOUNDARIES OF CHAPTER 15 ▪ Oro Negro filed for insolvency protection in Mexico in September 2017 • By March 2018, there were proceedings in Mexico, Singapore, and the United States as bondholders used international venues in an effort to seize their asserted collateral – One such proceeding was an action in New York to cause turnover of “jack-up” rigs in the Gulf of Mexico based on United States maritime law.
    [Show full text]
  • How Do Airlines Perceive That Strategic Alliances Affect Their Individual Branding?
    Journal of Air Transportation Vol. 11, No. 2 -2006 HOW DO AIRLINES PERCEIVE THAT STRATEGIC ALLIANCES AFFECT THEIR INDIVIDUAL BRANDING? Konstantinos Kalligiannis Cranfield University Bedford, United Kingdom Kostas Iatrou Hellenic Aviation Society Athens, Greece Keith Mason Cranfield University Bedford, United Kingdom ABSTRACT Much research has been carried out to evaluate the impact of strategic alliance membership on the performance of airlines. However it would be of interest to identify how airlines perceive this impact in terms of branding by each of the three global alliance groupings. It is the purpose of this paper to gather the opinion of airlines, belonging to the three strategic alliance groups, on the impact that the strategic alliance brands have had on their individual brands and how do they perceive that this impact will change in the future. To achieve this, a comprehensive survey of the alliance management and marketing departments of airlines participating in the three global strategic alliances was required. The results from this survey give an indication whether the strategic airline alliances, which are often referred to as marketing agreements, enhance, damage or have no impact on the individual airline brands. Konstantinos Kalligiannis is a Ph.D. candidate at Cranfield University (on Airline Branding inconsistencies within the Airline Alliances) and holds a M.Sc. in Airport Planning and Management from Loughborough University, a M.Sc. in Air Transport Management from Cranfield University and a B.A. in Business Administration from Luton University. Konstantinos is also working as an aviation consultant and airport planner. His key areas of expertise include air traffic forecasts, airport planning, feasibility studies and business plans for start up airlines.
    [Show full text]
  • Antitrust Immunity and International Airline Alliances
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Gillespie, William; Richard, Oliver M. Working Paper Antitrust Immunity and International Airline Alliances EAG Discussion Paper, No. 11-1 Provided in Cooperation with: Economic Analysis Group (EAG), Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice Suggested Citation: Gillespie, William; Richard, Oliver M. (2011) : Antitrust Immunity and International Airline Alliances, EAG Discussion Paper, No. 11-1, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Economic Analysis Group (EAG), Washington, DC This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/202391 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu ECONOMIC ANALYSIS GROUP DISCUSSION PAPER Antitrust Immunity and International Airline Alliances by William Gillespie and Oliver M.
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Airlines II
    BUSINESS TRAVEL BUYER’S HANDBOOK 2017 AIRLINES www.businesstravelnews.com Working With Airlines II. GATHER INFORMATION Proper data can help you win discounts for city pairs, multiple destinations from one city, regionally or across your travel program. A. Obtain information about your travel program from your TMC databases, online booking systems and third- party data consolidators: 1. Top 20, at least, city pairs by segment and passenger count, including car- rier and origin and destination data. 2. Carrier spend per airline per route for the most recent 12 months. 3. Tickets and value per class of ser- vice, including full-fare economy, discounted economy, business class and first class. Know the tradeoffs in using booked, ticketed or flown data. AFTER A WAVE OF MAJOR U.S. AIRLINE CONSOLIDATION AND THE CONTINUAL While bookings data is available growth of airline alliances and joint ventures, business travel buyers today have fewer more readily and with less of a lag, it avenues to negotiate airline deals than existed a decade ago. Certainly, that doesn’t help does not have the same precision as buyers negotiating position, nor does a market where demand and load factors continue ticketed or flown data. to increase worldwide. But business travel remains a lucrative and desirable segment 4. Analyze corporate card data to find for carriers the world over, given the possibility of premium-class and other high-yield trips booked outside your TMC. travel, and airlines still will heavily compete for that business, despite the leverage that Airlines do not count those trips consolidation has delivered to them.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Global Alliances to Airlines' Environmental Performance
    sustainability Article The Contribution of Global Alliances to Airlines’ Environmental Performance Belén Payán-Sánchez , Miguel Pérez-Valls * and José Antonio Plaza-Úbeda Economics and Business Department, University of Almería, Ctra. Sacramento s/n, La Cañada de San Urbano, 04120 Almería, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 June 2019; Accepted: 22 August 2019; Published: 24 August 2019 Abstract: Global alliances have traditionally been related to improvements in the economic and operational performances of companies, particularly in the airline industry. However, we still do not know the effect of the participation in this kind of multilateral agreement on the environmental performance of airlines. The main aim of this work is to analyze whether the alliance membership of airlines has an effect upon their environmental performance, and if so, whether or not the characteristics of the global alliance, as well as the business model of the airline, may influence this relation to a greater or lesser extent. The results of regression and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) in a sample of 252 airlines (58 included in one of the three global alliances: Star Alliance, Oneworld, and SkyTeam) show a strong and inverse relationship between environmental performance and belonging to an alliance. The paper also shows empirical evidence of the influence of the business model of the airline on environmental performance. These results suggest important implications for managers facing challenges regarding sustainability. Keywords: global alliances; sustainability; environmental performance; airlines; aviation 1. Introduction The aviation sector is the fastest-growing source of greenhouse gas emissions worldwide [1]. Many authors and corporations, such as the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the International Air Transport Association (IATA), agree that environmental sustainability may be achieved through external pressure with the imposition and accomplishment of different policies, regulations, taxations and other fiscal instruments [2–6].
    [Show full text]
  • A Chronological History
    A Chronological History December 2016 Pedro Heilbron, CEO of Copa Airlines, elected as new Chairman of the Star Alliance Chief Executive Board November 2016 Star Alliance Gold Track launched in Frankfurt, Star Alliance’s busiest hub October 2016 Juneyao Airlines announced as future Connecting Partner of Star Allianceseal partnership August 2016 Star Alliance adds themed itineraries to its Round the World product portfolio July 2016 Star Alliance Los Angeles lounge wins Skytrax Award for second year running Star Alliance takes ‘Best Alliance’ title at Skytrax World Airline Awards June 2016 New self-service check-in processes launched in Tokyo-Narita Star Alliance announces Jeffrey Goh will take over as Star Alliance CEO from 2017, on the retirement of Mark Schwab Swiss hosts Star Alliance Chief Executive Board meeting in Zurich. The CEOs arrive on the first passenger flight of the Bombardier C Series. Page 1 of 1 Page 2 of 2 April 2016 Star Alliance: Global travel solutions for conventions and meetings at IMEX March 2016 Star Alliance invites lounge guests to share tips via #irecommend February 2016 Star Alliance airlines launch new check-in processes at Los Angeles’ Tom Bradley International Terminal (TBIT) Star Alliance Gold Card holders enjoy free upgrades on Heathrow Express trains Star Alliance supports Ramsar’s Youth Photo Contest – Alliance’s Biosphere Connections initiative now in its ninth year January 2016 Gold Track priority at security added as a Star Alliance Gold Status benefit December 2015 Star Alliance launches Connecting
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Paul Stephen Dempsey
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2008 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Before Alliances, there was Pan American World Airways . and Trans World Airlines. Before the mega- Alliances, there was interlining, facilitated by IATA Like dogs marking territory, airlines around the world are sniffing each other's tail fins looking for partners." Daniel Riordan “The hardest thing in working on an alliance is to coordinate the activities of people who have different instincts and a different language, and maybe worship slightly different travel gods, to get them to work together in a culture that allows them to respect each other’s habits and convictions, and yet work productively together in an environment in which you can’t specify everything in advance.” Michael E. Levine “Beware a pact with the devil.” Martin Shugrue Airline Motivations For Alliances • the desire to achieve greater economies of scale, scope, and density; • the desire to reduce costs by consolidating redundant operations; • the need to improve revenue by reducing the level of competition wherever possible as markets are liberalized; and • the desire to skirt around the nationality rules which prohibit multinational ownership and cabotage. Intercarrier Agreements · Ticketing-and-Baggage Agreements · Joint-Fare Agreements · Reciprocal Airport Agreements · Blocked Space Relationships · Computer Reservations Systems Joint Ventures · Joint Sales Offices and Telephone Centers · E-Commerce Joint Ventures · Frequent Flyer Program Alliances · Pooling Traffic & Revenue · Code-Sharing Code Sharing The term "code" refers to the identifier used in flight schedule, generally the 2-character IATA carrier designator code and flight number. Thus, XX123, flight 123 operated by the airline XX, might also be sold by airline YY as YY456 and by ZZ as ZZ9876.
    [Show full text]
  • STAR ALLIANCE to ESTABLISH CENTRE of EXCELLENCE in SINGAPORE New Setup Reflects Global Character of the Alliance
    STAR ALLIANCE TO ESTABLISH CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE IN SINGAPORE New setup reflects global character of the Alliance FRANKFURT – March 22, 2021 – Star Alliance will establish a management office in the city state of Singapore later this year. This was a decision taken by its Chief Executive Board, comprising the Chief Executive Officers of its 26 member airlines, who considered a new centre of excellence to be an important dimension of positioning the Alliance to deliver on its post-Coronavirus strategy, and for it to remain innovative, resilient and nimble. All businesses are reimagining a post-pandemic world fundamentally changed by COVID-19, and the associated disruption to global networks, economies, and the livelihoods of many. A consequence of the world’s reaction to COVID-19 has been the destabilizing effect it has had on aviation. This decision to future-proof the Alliance was made against this backdrop. Effectively, Star Alliance will maintain two centres of excellence internationally, in keeping with the global character of the Alliance. The Singapore office will complement the long-standing office in Frankfurt, Germany and will focus on progressing its strategy in digital customer experience. Two members of the Alliance, Lufthansa and Singapore Airlines, have established innovation hubs in the City, another benefit as the Alliance continues its ground-breaking digital customer experience innovations. Singapore was selected based on considered criteria, such as access to innovation and global competitiveness. Singapore has also been ranked highly for the ease of doing business by the World Bank on a consistent basis and has been ranked the most competitive country in the world on several occasions.
    [Show full text]
  • Facility: MIA Units: Flight Operations Miami-Dade Aviation Department
    Miami-Dade Aviation Department Aviation Statistics Flight Ops - All Airlines Facility: MIA Units: Flight Operations Current Year:10/2019 -08/2020 Prior Year:10/2018 -08/2019 Domestic International % Domestic International Arrival Departure Arrival Departure Total Change Operator Total Arrival Departure Arrival Departure 34,498 35,733 19,642 18,361 108,234 -35.66% American Airlines Inc 168,212 46,736 49,281 37,409 34,786 15,407 16,386 2,522 1,458 35,773 -33.09% Envoy Air Inc 53,468 21,022 23,495 5,776 3,175 7,953 9,208 2,884 1,631 21,676 -21.90% Generic Cash and GA 27,755 10,302 13,119 3,570 764 Account 5,444 5,452 352 348 11,596 -33.53% Delta Air Lines Inc 17,446 8,106 8,108 617 615 1,891 1,889 2,438 2,250 8,468 8.97% United Parcel Service 7,771 1,348 1,486 2,538 2,399 3,645 3,649 0 0 7,294 -14.35% United Airlines, Inc 8,516 4,256 4,260 0 0 496 474 2,502 2,502 5,974 -28.08% Swift Air LLC 8,306 336 316 3,814 3,840 1,578 1,483 1,249 1,335 5,645 3.27% Atlas Air Inc 5,466 1,453 1,353 1,305 1,355 2,202 2,199 0 0 4,401 107.99% Frontier Airlines 2,116 1,058 1,058 0 0 0 0 1,904 1,903 3,807 14.81% LATAM Airlines Group SA 3,316 0 6 1,657 1,653 0 0 1,886 1,893 3,779 10.34% Tampa Cargo S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The 5Th IBS OPS General Meeting!
    Welcome to the 5th IBS OPS General Meeting! 1 Report of the IBS OPS WG Harold Schwart, DL IBS OPS WG Chairman 23 September 2019 Introduction Survey • Thank you for completing the survey • Your comments matter to us and help us to better serve you • The primary comment received – so much material to cover in one day • This year is no different but unfortunately not in our control • I will do my best to follow the Agenda running order and a schedule of events has been provided • Please complete the survey again this year; we hear you and will continue trying to improve IR2 Report of the IBS OPS WG 23 September 2019 Breakout Sessions There are Four Breakout Sessions planned • BS1- Involuntary Interline TFC Problem and Solution • BS2- Chart 2 and Impact on Passenger Revenue Accounting • BS3- Lowest Applicable Fare • BS4- Interline Settlement Best Practices (Passenger & Cargo) ❖ They are informal and interaction is encouraged IR2 Report of the IBS OPS WG 23 September 2019 WG Membership • Membership approval of FinCom is required • The IBS OPS WG consists of 15 members and; • 2 Official Observers • They are full members but do not vote for Chair & Vice-Chair • Appointments are for a term of 3 years IR2 Report of the IBS OPS WG 23 September 2019 Meetings • Since the 5th WFS in Madrid the IBS OPS WG met: • In YUL - November 2018 • In MAD - May 2019 • And, here yesterday in preparation for this General Meeting • We have monthly conference calls when not meeting face to face IR2 Report of the IBS OPS WG 23 September 2019 Composition of the WG IBSOPSWG
    [Show full text]
  • Geoff Dixon, CEO, Qantas Airways
    A MAGAZINE FOR AIRLINE EXECUTIVES 2004 Issue No. 2 T aking your airline to new heights AN ALLIED FRONT A conversation with … Geoff Dixon, CEO, Qantas Airways INSIDE Air France and KLM form 4 Europe’s Largest Airline 18 The Evolution of Alliances A Conversation with oneworld, SkyTeam 26 and Star Alliance proven Taking your airline to new heights 2004 Issue No. 2 leadership. Editors in Chief an affiliate of Sabre Holdings Corporation. ©2004 Sabre Inc. All rights reserved. Stephani Hawkins B. Scott Hunt 3150 Sabre Drive Southlake, Texas 76092 Sabre Airline Solutions and the Sabre Airline Solutions logo are trademarks and/or service marks of www.sabreairlinesolutions.com Designer James Frisbie Contributors Venkat Anganagari, Randal Beasley, Hans Belle, Nejib Ben-Khedher, Kathy Benson, Jack Burkholder, Cameron Curtis, Sally deFina, Karen Dielman, James Filsinger, Brenda Gale, Greg Gilchrist, Gretchen Greene, Jim Haley, Glen Harvell, Kathryn Hayden, Vicki Hummel, Carla Jensen, Craig Lindsey, Patrice Lipson, George Lynch, Michael McCurdy, Matt McLellan, Mona Naguib, Nancy Ornelas, Jenny Rizzolo, Dave Roberts, Sanjay Sathe, Shari Stiborek, Renzo Vaccari, Elayne Vick. Awards It’s time for all-out innovation. And it’s time for proven leadership. Mission-criti- 2004 International Association of cal areas require time-tested solutions. Longer than any other company, we’ve Business Communicators Bronze Quill and Silver Quill. pushed technology forward to deliver vital systems airlines need to stay ahead, 2004 Awards for Publication Excellence. to make the impossible practical. Reader Inquiries If you have questions about this Working closely with carriers, we’ve developed a portfolio of flexible, integrated publication or suggested topics for future articles, please send an e-mail solutions that can optimize operations of all airlines — any size, any business to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Alliances
    AIRLINE ALLIANCES by Paul Stephen Dempsey Director, Institute of Air & Space Law McGill University Copyright © 2011 by Paul Stephen Dempsey Open Skies • 1992 - the United States concluded the first second generation “open skies” agreement with the Netherlands. It allowed KLM and any other Dutch carrier to fly to any point in the United States, and allowed U.S. carriers to fly to any point in the Netherlands, a country about the size of West Virginia. The U.S. was ideologically wedded to open markets, so the imbalance in traffic rights was of no concern. Moreover, opening up the Netherlands would allow KLM to drain traffic from surrounding airline networks, which would eventually encourage the surrounding airlines to ask their governments to sign “open skies” bilateral with the United States. • 1993 - the U.S. conferred antitrust immunity on the Wings Alliance between Northwest Airlines and KLM. The encirclement policy began to corrode resistance to liberalization as the sixth freedom traffic drain began to grow; soon Lufthansa, then Air France, were asking their governments to sign liberal bilaterals. • 1996 - Germany fell, followed by the Czech Republic, Italy, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Malta, Poland. • 2001- the United States had concluded bilateral open skies agreements with 52 nations and concluded its first multilateral open skies agreement with Brunei, Chile, New Zealand and Singapore. • 2002 – France fell. • 2007 - The U.S. and E.U. concluded a multilateral “open skies” traffic agreement that liberalized everything but foreign ownership and cabotage. • 2011 – cumulatively, the U.S. had signed “open skies” bilaterals with more than100 States. Multilateral and Bilateral Air Transport Agreements • Section 5 of the Transit Agreement, and Section 6 of the Transport Agreement, provide: “Each contracting State reserves the right to withhold or revoke a certificate or permit to an air transport enterprise of another State in any case where it is not satisfied that substantial ownership and effective control are vested in nationals of a contracting State .
    [Show full text]