DOCSLIB.ORG

December 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
December 2010 ...your eyes and ears for the next two years Volume 2 www.obamabidenwatch.org Issue 11 December 2010 www.citizensunited.org Obama’s “Unprecedented” Transparency About To Face First Test To this day, President Obama has the fol- Not only did President Obama enjoy a non- lowing statement posted prominently on inquisitive Congress, but he continues to be mired www.whitehouse.gov: “My Administration is in a love affair with wide swaths of the main- committed to creating an unprecedented level of stream media. When there was a question worth openness in Government. We will work together asking, chances are The New York Times, The to ensure the public trust and establish a system of Washington Post, Time, Newsweek, NBC, ABC, transparency, public participation, and collabora- and CBS all obediently dropped the ball. Let’s tion. Openness will strengthen our democracy and be honest, it’s easy to be for unprecedented trans- promote efficiency and effectiveness in Govern- parency when no one is asking you about any- ment.” thing politically inconvenient. And that’s the Being a Washington politician, he talks a point: can the true measure of a politician’s devo- good game, but President Obama’s promise to run tion to government openness be judged before it’s his administration with unprecedented transpar- put to a legitimate test? By most accounts, it’s ency is about to face its first true test. In early about to be put to the test in a big way. For January 2011, more than 20 committees in the Obama and congressional Democrats, being in U.S. House of Representatives will change hands. total control of Washington for the past two years Republican chairman will now have the power to has turned out to be a double-edged sword - all conduct the first oversight of the President and his the questions that went unanswered over that du- administration. How Mr. Obama will handle this ration will be asked again - this time with sub- new dynamic is anyone’s guess. From the outset, poena and deposition authority. Obama & Co. have been subject to no congres- Which path will President Obama take? sional scrutiny whatsoever. Outgoing-Speaker Either you cooperate or you drag your feet. Ei- Pelosi and Senator Reid and their liberal lieuten- ther you are forthright with Congress or you pick ants made the conscious decision to let the ad- a fight. There are several issues that the President ministration do as it pleased for two years, essen- needs to consider. Many of these congressional tially putting a hold on any meaningful oversight investigations and public hearings will play out so they could concentrate on passing their anti- during his re-election campaign. If he cooperates growth agenda. To the detriment of most Ameri- with Congress and releases all the requested in- cans, Democrats were largely successful in doing formation for public inspection, it could adversely this. affect him in the polls. Continued on the next page... © Citizens United ~ 1006 Pennsylvania Ave SE ~ Washington D.C. 20003 Page 2 If he decides to stonewall Congress instead, it also could hurt him in the polls. Picking fights with Congress conjure up memories of the In this Issue Clinton years - not exactly evidence that you tried to change Wash- ington. Obama’s “Unprecedented” Transparency About To Face First Test Pg. 1 Government Motors Pg. 3 What Are the Democrats Giving You this Holiday Season? Pg. 5 Citizens United Productions Presents Pg. 7 U.S. House of Representatives Hearing Room Final Thoughts There are no easy answers for the president. If Mr. Obama Pg. 8 thought his first two years were a challenge, he hasn’t seen anything __________________________ yet. The Obama Administration being arrogant is a narrative that’s Published By already in the works. How he interfaces with Congress in a divided Citizens United government will be a big chapter in that narrative one way or the other. Here are just a few of the contentious issues Congress will Editor almost certainly be asking questions about: David N. Bossie Wikileaks Managing Editor The executive order to close GITMO J.T. Mastranadi Civilian terror trials Contributors Terrorists given Miranda rights Chris Berg Investigating the CIA Jeff Marschner Stimulus fraud Alexa Moutevelis Health care bill deliberations Health care law constitutionality Publication Design Missile defense Kirk Risinger Iran policy Julie Drinkard Climate change evidence Joe Sestak’s job offer Copyright © 2010 by Taxpayer funded bailouts Citizens United The federal budget deficit © Citizens United ~ 1006 Pennsylvania Ave SE ~ Washington D.C. 20003 Page 3 Government Motors eral government effectively purchased General Motors. Americans have a unique relationship with The restrictions of the past are too numer- their cars. From the days that the first Model T ous to count, but those of the Obama Administra- rolled off Henry Ford’s assembly line, to the clas- tion are poised to make them seem trivial. The sics of the 1950s and 1960s, our cars have served Obama Administration has gone far beyond their as a symbol of our freedom and independ- predecessors in attempting to reinvent the driving ence. We all remember the first time we were en- experience. The Department of Transportation, trusted with the keys to our parents’ automobile led by Obama’s token Republican Cabinet Secre- and were able to set off on the open road. tary Ray LaHood, is at the forefront of the Today that freedom is being encroached Obama Administration’s attempts to define your upon. The Obama Administration is seizing on ride. its perceived regulatory authority to restrict every aspect of our driving experience. Long ago the federal government sought to regulate how fast we could drive by offering fed- eral funds for highway repair to states that would cap speed limits. In 1974, when the Emergency Highway Conservation Act was signed into law, the new “national speed limit” was set at 55 miles per hour. This was done in an attempt to reduce oil consumption. It wasn’t until 1987 that the federal government saw fit to raise the “national Ray LaHood accepting President Obama’s nomination as Secretary of the Department of Transporation. speed limit” to 65 miles per hour. The Federal government should not be in the business of setting state speed limits. Con- Secretary LaHood and his team of bureau- gress finally acknowledged this in 1995, when crats feel that too many drivers are driving they repealed the law and completely returned the “distracted.” You may wonder what exactly is power to set speed limits to the states. “distracted driving” and what can the government Along with the ability to set speed limits do to stop it? The Department of Transportation the federal government has long exercised control seems to think that a public relations campaign over new automobile gas mileage and emissions will help explain the problem and prevent it -- as standards. Rarely does a year go by where we do a result, they launched the website distrac- not see the federal government propose more on- tion.gov. From this public relations campaign, featured on Oprah, we learn that: erous restrictions on the automobile industry, thus increasing the cost to purchase a new car. Sadly “Distracted driving is any non-driving ac- we’ve all come to accept the federal govern- tivity a person engages in while operating a mo- ment’s ability to dominate private industry and tor vehicle. Such activities have the potential to private activity in this fashion. We’ve been so distract the person from the primary task of driv- complicit, no one batted an eyelash when the fed- ing and increase the Continued on the next page... © Citizens United ~ 1006 Pennsylvania Ave SE ~ Washington D.C. 20003 Page 4 risk of crashing.” “I think the technology is there and I think you’re going to see the technology become adaptable in So in short, distracted driving is anything automobiles to disable these cell phones. We need one does in a car other than drive. Does that in- to do a lot more if we’re going to save lives.” clude trying to calm screaming children? What about listening to the radio? Maybe listening is This ludicrous effort caused Michelle Mal- allowed, but singing along is problematic. kin to dub LaHood “Obama’s Power-Mad Cell The real target of Secretary LaHood’s war Phone Czar.” If regulation can really prevent dis- against distraction is cellular telephones. At dis- tracted driving accidents, why is LaHood stop- traction.gov it is promised that they “will not rest ping with disabling cellular phones? Perhaps he until [they] stop” distracted driving. Many states should ban radios and CD players, or prohibit have passed “hands-free” laws and restricted children under the age of 12 from riding in a vehi- one’s ability to legally send text messages while cle, because they may fuss and distract the driving in an effort to reduce accidents and inci- driver. Such efforts would be met with significant dents stemming from the use of cellular tele- opposition. The real truth is that all driving is dis- phones. Secretary LaHood does not believe these tracted driving. The federal government cannot eliminate risk in our lives and it should not at- state efforts go far enough. tempt to by taking away our personal choices and In the days preceding Thanksgiving, Secre- freedoms. tary LaHood sought to further promote his public relations campaign against “distracted driv- ing.” During the course of an interview on MSNBC he explained that “there’s a lot of tech- nology out there now that can disable phones and we’re looking at that.” LaHood wants to prevent your cell phone from working in your car.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • About Jamie Radtke
    About Jamie Radtke Jamie is part of a new generation of courageous, conservative leadership. She will fight to maintain the Founders‟ vision of individual rights, constitutional adherence, limited government, fiscal restraint, free markets, and virtue and accountability. Jamie has the courage and integrity to stand firm on her principles and will not compromise our future with the Washington Establishment—Democrat or Republican. As a DC outsider and a leader of the „Tea Party‟ insurgency (she was credited by the Wall Street Journal with helping the Virginia Tea Party Patriot Federation become one of the most advanced in the nation), Jamie is helping drive the debate on spending in DC. She has experience in private business, non-profits, government and civic organizations. She is a wife and mother of three children. JAMIE RADTKE WILL: Oppose raising the federal debt ceiling. End unsustainable federal deficits by cutting trillions and capping spending as a percentage of GDP. Work for meaningful, courageous reform of entitlement programs. Support the intrinsic right to life. Protect and uphold the traditional family. Defend the 2nd Amendment. Fight to eliminate government subsidies. Advocate for energy independent policies that bring down the price of gas. Oppose illegal immigration. Propose a fairer, flatter tax to grow jobs. EXPERIENCE: EDUCATION: Virginia Tea Party Patriots Federation – Bachelor of Science in Government – Co-Founder and Chairwoman Liberty University Richmond Tea Party – President Master of Public Policy –The College of Sovereign Consulting – Founder & William & Mary Consultant Virginia Conservative Action PAC – HONORS & LEADERSHIP: Political & Grassroots Director National Sam Adams Alliance Award American Management Systems – 2010 – for Tea Party citizen leadership Business Analyst Featured in Fire from the Heartland Virginia Dep.
    [Show full text]
  • Obama Biden Watch
    ...your eyes and ears for the next two years Volume 3 www.obamabidenwatch.org Issue 7 July 2011 www.citizensunited.org “Business As Usual” Barack "It's no different than what happened under eight years of dozens of infamous “White House coffees” in the George Bush and eight years of Bill Clinton" White House Map Room with big donors to his – Obama White House official campaign and the Democrat Party. The central questions surrounding these coffees were whether If you were a Democrat President who campaigned or not President Clinton was essentially holding on changing the way Washington works and hold- fundraising events inside the White House and ing your administration to a higher standard, would whether Clinton-Gore officials and the DNC were using the White House as a political tool to help the campaign. The disclosure of these “White House coffees” led to what became wide-ranging, overlapping Justice Department and Congressional investigations that lasted for years in which dozens were charged with various campaign finance crimes. While no one was ultimately prosecuted for the shenanigans directly related to the coffees, it took years of bad press, millions in legal fees, hundreds of subpoenas and th Barack Obama gives lofty speeches, but they are mere platitudes nothing 5 amendment assertions, and endless congres- more. Source: WhiteHouse.gov sional hearings and depositions to figure out. you tape campaign fundraising videos in the White Mr. Obama’s lawyers and advisers must have re- House Map Room of all places, even if it is per- minded him about the scandal that emanated from haps technically legal? the White House Map Room following the 1996 elections (the same year he was first elected to the Of course you wouldn’t.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Eye, Summer 2017
    SUMMER 2017 The Public Eye In this issue: The Christian Right and Fourth Generation Warfare How Antisemitism Animates White Nationalism When Prison Ministries Prioritize Salvation Over Justice Charles Koch and the Makings of a Right-Wing Empire editor’s letter As the summer issue of The Public Eye ships to the printers, it’s been a whirlwind week. THE PUBLIC EYE Republicans’ efforts to overthrow Obamacare failed dramatically in the early hours of July QUARTERLY 28, but this victory followed some of the Trump administration’s most aggressive anti- PUBLISHER LGBTQ actions to date. Trump delivered an unprecedentedly ugly partisan speech to the Boy Tarso Luís Ramos Scouts of America, endorsed police brutality to a law enforcement audience, and publicly EDITOR mused about firing officials over the ongoing Russia investigation and pardoning himself Kathryn Joyce for what they may find. As many are now questioning if the administration is on a messy COVER ART slide towards authoritarianism, this issue homes in on some of what got us here. Ashley Lukashevsky Sociologist and former civilian intelligence analyst James Scaminaci takes a close look at a little-known right-wing strategy developed in LAYOUT “Fourth Generation Warfare” (pg. 4), Gabriel Joffe the 1980s and deployed over decades by strategists Paul Weyrich and William S. Lind. A fusion of military theory and the Christian Right agenda, Fourth Generation Warfare seeks PRINTING Red Sun Press to undermine the public’s confidence not just in the government and media, but in a com- monly-accepted reality itself. The result, Scaminaci writes, is “an all-out propaganda war EDITORIAL BOARD against secular liberalism” and the political mainstream, waged “with the same intensity Frederick Clarkson • Alex DiBranco as a shooting war.” Fourth Generation Warfare, he argues, set the template for Trump’s no- Tope Fadiran • Gabriel Joffe Kapya Kaoma • Greeley O’Connor holds-barred campaign against the political establishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Steve Bannon: Five Things to Know
    Steve Bannon: Five Things to Know 1. BANNON HAS EMBRACED THE ALT RIGHT Bannon, the former chief strategist in the Trump administration, has expressed his enthusiasm for the altaltaltalt right rightrightright, a loose network of individuals and groups that promote white identity and reject mainstream conservatism in favor of politics that embrace implicit or explicit racism, antisemitism and white supremacy. Alt right adherents oppose multiculturalism, immigration and often claim that there is a Jewish conspiracy to advocate for “white genocide.” These messages are often delivered via social media, using “ironic” memes and/or slogans. Bannon “proudly” told a Mother Jones reporter at the 2016 Republican National Convention ““““wewewewe’r’r’r’r’r’reeee th thththeeee p ppplatformlatformlatformlatform for forforfor th thththeeee alt altaltalt right, right,right,right,”””” referring to Breitbart News, which he headed at the time. In the same interview, Bannon denied that the alt right is inherently racist or antisemitic, and under his leadership, Breitbart published an 1 / 6 article co-authored by Milo Yiannopoulos, a figure associated with the alt right, downplaying the racism of some of the alt right’s main ideologues. In August 2016, alt right personality Richard Spencer told the Daily Beast, “Breitbart has elective affinities with the alt-right and the alt-right has clearly influenced Breitbart. In this way, Breitbart has acted as a ‘gateway’ to alt-right ideas and writers.” When President Trump named Bannon as his chief strategist, numerous
    [Show full text]
  • Obama Biden Watch
    ...your eyes and ears for the next four years Volume 2 www.obamabidenwatch.org Issue 7 July 2010 www.citizensunited.org Blagojevich & Defense Team Fold For the last year and a half, disgraced for- The defense even went as far as to request a mer Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich has been subpoena for President Obama himself, a request promising that he would testify at his corruption that was denied by U.S. District Judge James trial in order to clear his name. The intrigue built Zagel. The judge said that he would reconsider and built as the country waited to hear what the ruling if Blago’s lawyers presented more evi- Blagojevich would say on the stand and who else dence indicating the need for Obama’s testimony. he might implicate along the way. Such evidence arguably was presented – by the The Blago defense team also put the White prosecution – but curiously no request was re- House and national Democrat establishment on issued to compel the President’s testimony. notice that they were going to call several promi- According to The Wall Street Journal, “The nent members of their leadership as witnesses. night before he was elected president, Barack Subpoenas were issued for White House Chief of Obama told an emissary to suggest that former Staff Rahm Emanuel, Senior Adviser Valerie Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich appoint Mr. Jarrett, U.S. Senators Harry Reid and Dick Obama’s close friend to fill his U.S. Senate seat… Durbin, and Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. Tom Balanoff, an official with the Service Em- ployees International Union and Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Mercer
    Robert Mercer: the big data billionaire waging war on mainstream media With links to Donald Trump, Steve Bannon and Nigel Farage, the rightwing US computer scientist is at the heart of a multimillion-dollar propaganda network Robert Mercer in New York in 2014. Photograph: DDP USA/Rex Shutterstock Carole Cadwalladr @carolecadwalla Sunday 26 February 2017 09.00 GMT Last modified on Sunday 26 February 2017 09.03 GMT J ust over a week ago, Donald Trump gathered members of the world’s press before him and told them they were liars. “The press, honestly, is out of control,” he said. “The public doesn’t believe you any more.” CNN was described as “very fake news… story after story is bad”. The BBC was “another beauty”. That night I did two things. First, I typed “Trump” in the search box of Twitter. My feed was reporting that he was crazy, a lunatic, a raving madman. But that wasn’t how it was playing out elsewhere. The results produced a stream of “Go Donald!!!!”, and “You show ’em!!!” There were star-spangled banner emojis and thumbs-up emojis and clips of Trump laying into the “FAKE news MSM liars!” Trump had spoken, and his audience had heard him. Then I did what I’ve been doing for two and a half months now. I Googled “mainstream media is…” And there it was. Google’s autocomplete suggestions: “mainstream media is… dead, dying, fake news, fake, finished”. Is it dead, I wonder? Has FAKE news won? Are we now the FAKE news? Is the mainstream media – we, us, I – dying? I click Google’s first suggested link.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Wars: Inside Trump's Assault on Immigration
    Dedication For Armando “Mando” Montaño Who died young, and lives on Contents Cover Title Page Dedication Prologue Chapter One: “Brown Animals” Chapter Two: “Ridiculous Liberal Elite” Chapter Three: “Speak Only English” Chapter Four: “Pick Up My Trash” Chapter Five: “There Is No Palestine” Chapter Six: “Cut Their Skin” Chapter Seven: “Our Whole Country is Rotting” Chapter Eight: “I Want to Hate” Chapter Nine: “New Day in America” Chapter Ten: “We Love Defeating Those People” Chapter Eleven: “American Carnage” Chapter Twelve: “Cosmopolitan Bias” Chapter Thirteen: “White Lives Matter” Chapter Fourteen: “These are Animals” Chapter Fifteen: “Pandora’s Box” Chapter Sixteen: “Out of Love” Author’s Note Acknowledgments Notes Index Copyright About the Publisher Prologue STEPHEN MILLER WAS CENTER STAGE. He grinned at the sea of red baseball caps in the San Diego Convention Center on May 27, 2016. In a slim suit with a pocket square, he adjusted the podium microphone and told spectators that his boss—the man who would “save” the country—was about to come out. The crowd erupted. “Are you ready to secure that border?” Miller asked, lifting a finger in the air. “Are you ready to stop Islamic terrorism? And are you ready to make sure that American children are given their birthright in their own country?” Miller could hardly contain himself. He rocked back and forth on his heels. He swung side to side. Long dismissed as a sideshow, the svelte pale thirty-year-old was months from becoming one of the most powerful people in the US government. He coaxed cheers from thousands in his home state of California, where once he had faced hisses and boos.
    [Show full text]
  • May 1, 2017 Price $8.99
    PRICE $8.99 MAY 1, 2017 MAY 1, 2017 4 GOINGS ON ABOUT TOWN 17 THE TALK OF THE TOWN David Remnick on the first hundred days of Donald Trump. LIFE AND LETTERS Ariel Levy 22 A Long Homecoming Elizabeth Strout’s small-town novels. SHOUTS & MURMURS Calvin Trillin 27 The Irish Constellation LETTER FROM COLOMBIA Jon Lee Anderson 28 Out of the Jungle Former guerrillas try adapting to peace. THE POLITICAL SCENE Connie Bruck 34 A Hollywood Story What, exactly, did Steve Bannon do in the movie industry? PROFILES Joshua Rothman 46 The Seeker A Christian concedes the culture wars. SHOWCASE Pari Dukovic 52 Rei Kawakubo at the Costume Institute. FICTION David Means 56 “Two Ruminations on a Homeless Brother” THE CRITICS THE THEATRE Hilton Als 60 Bette Midler in “Hello, Dolly!” BOOKS Louis Menand 63 Rereading Norman Podhoretz’s “Making It.” 69 Briefly Noted A CRITIC AT LARGE Anthony Lane 70 The films of Jean-Pierre Melville. POP MUSIC Hua Hsu 74 Kendrick Lamar’s “DAMN.” ON TELEVISION Emily Nussbaum 76 “American Crime.” MUSICAL EVENTS Alex Ross 78 Icelandic music in Los Angeles. POEMS Dan Chiasson 38 “From ‘The Names of 1,001 Strangers’ ” Anne Carson 50 “Saturday Night as an Adult” COVER Mark Ulriksen “Strike Zone” DRAWINGS Danny Shanahan, Shannon Wheeler, John Klossner, Jason Adam Katzenstein, Drew Dernavich, Bruce Eric Kaplan, Trevor Spaulding, Will McPhail, William Haefeli, Roz Chast, Harry Bliss, David Sipress, Corey Pandolph, Amy Hwang SPOTS Miguel Porlan CONTRIBUTORS Connie Bruck (“A Hollywood Story,” Jon Lee Anderson (“Out of the Jungle,” p. 34) has been a staff writer since 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Obama Biden Watch
    ...your eyes and ears for the next two years Volume 2 www.obamabidenwatch.org Issue 10 November 2010 www.citizensunited.org Beware of the Lame Duck Congress Republicans may be in control of the U.S. historic 2010 elections, Obama, Pelosi, and Reid’s House of Representatives when the 112th Con- tax strategy seemed to be centered on picking and gress comes to Washington, D.C. in January, but choosing who deserves tax cuts and who doesn’t. the 111th Congress isn’t dead yet. When the dis- Continuing this anti-growth mentality in the lame astrous Pelosi-Reid-led Congress comes back for duck Congress would be a colossal mistake and its lame duck session on November 15th, it should would cause gridlock in the U.S. Senate. It does- have one thing in mind: do no more harm to n’t take a genius to know that in this type of eco- country or party. But clearly, doing what the nomic situation every American urgently needs American people want has not been the modus tax relief, not just the folks Obama, Pelosi, and operandi thus far. We should all be uneasy, be- Reid judge to be worthy of help. cause two months is enough time to do a lot more It’s not a stretch to say that a majority of damage if we let our guards down. th Americans would be satisfied with the 111 Con- th Let’s review. When the 111 Congress be- gress coming back, extending the tax cuts and gan its war against prosperity in January 2009, the leaving for home, never to be seen again, except national debt registered at $10.6 trillion; it is cur- in the history books in the “how NOT to govern” rently $13.7 trillion and rising rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • Obama Biden Watch
    ...your eyes and ears for the next two years Volume 3 www.obamabidenwatch.org Issue 2 February 2011 www.citizensunited.org How the Citizens United Ruling Freed Political Speech As printed in The Washington Post on January 21, 2011. accused the court of attempting to "predetermine the out- By David N. Bossie and Theodore B. Olson come of next November's elections," handing them to "Corporate America and other special interests." And One year ago today, the Supreme Court issued its when the November elections brought grim tidings to landmark decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election many Democratic officeholders, those candidates blamed Commission. It upheld the First Amendment rights of indi- not themselves nor their unpopular policies but the court. viduals acting through corporations and labor unions to "Clearly the Citizens United decision decided this race," participate in our political process, and it struck down an said a freshly defeated Rep. Dan Maffei. Sen. Arlen Spec- oppressive thicket of statutes restricting - and even crimi- ter went so far as to blame Citizens United not only for his nalizing - their political speech. rejection at the ballot box but also for "effectively under- The case arose in 2007, when Citizens United, a mining the basic democratic principle of the power of one grass-roots membership organization, sought to broadcast person, one vote." a film critical of Hillary Clinton, then a candidate for Serious charges, but as the justices wrote in Citi- president. The Federal Election Commission deemed the zens United, "[r]hetoric ought not obscure reality." So film too critical to be shown in the weeks before an elec- what is the reality? tion; if Citizens United had broadcast it, its officers would Without question, Citizens United has enabled citi- have been subject to prosecution and potential imprison- zen organizations (curiously and disparagingly labeled ment for up to five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen K. Bannon : an American Prayer
    Universidades Lusíada Rodrigues, Luís Manuel Barbosa, 1962- Stephen K. Bannon : an American prayer http://hdl.handle.net/11067/5668 https://doi.org/10.34628/t2mt-b589 Metadados Data de Publicação 2020 Resumo The present study attempts to understand the main vectors of Stephen K. Bannon’s political thought, a thought that decisively influenced the last American Administration practice.... O presente estudo visa conhecer os principais vetores do pensamento político de Stephen K. Bannon, pensamento que influenciou decisivamente a prática da última Administração americana.... Palavras Chave Bannon, Stephen K., 1953- - Visão política e social, Estados Unidos - Política e governo - 2017-, Nacionalismo - Estados Unidos Tipo article Revisão de Pares Não Coleções [ILID-CEJEA] Polis, s. 2, n. 01 (Janeiro-Junho 2020) Esta página foi gerada automaticamente em 2021-10-10T18:36:49Z com informação proveniente do Repositório http://repositorio.ulusiada.pt STEPHEN K. BANNON: AN AMERICAN PRAYER - L. Barbosa Rodrigues Stephen K. Bannon: an american prayer manipulator4, propagandist5, determined6, L. Barbosa Rodrigues intelligent and charismatic7, systemic8, Doutor e Mestre em Direito pela Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa Anglo-Saxon, but, above all, and viscerally, Professor Associado das Faculdades de Direito da Universidade Lusíada de Lisboa e da Universidade Lusíada Norte - Porto Investigador do Centro de Estudos, Jurídicos, Económicos e Ambientais da Universidade Lusíada (CEJEA) North American. E-mail: [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000-0002-0386-3704 II - His professional and political careers DOI: https://doi.org/10.34628/t2mt-b589 are rather heteroclite, or, at the least, unu- Abstract: Resumo: sual. Emerging from the typical American The present study attempts to unders- O presente estudo visa conhecer os prin- working class of the fifties (born 1953)9, he tand the main vectors of Stephen K.
    [Show full text]