Border Wars: Inside Trump's Assault on Immigration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Border Wars: Inside Trump's Assault on Immigration Dedication For Armando “Mando” Montaño Who died young, and lives on Contents Cover Title Page Dedication Prologue Chapter One: “Brown Animals” Chapter Two: “Ridiculous Liberal Elite” Chapter Three: “Speak Only English” Chapter Four: “Pick Up My Trash” Chapter Five: “There Is No Palestine” Chapter Six: “Cut Their Skin” Chapter Seven: “Our Whole Country is Rotting” Chapter Eight: “I Want to Hate” Chapter Nine: “New Day in America” Chapter Ten: “We Love Defeating Those People” Chapter Eleven: “American Carnage” Chapter Twelve: “Cosmopolitan Bias” Chapter Thirteen: “White Lives Matter” Chapter Fourteen: “These are Animals” Chapter Fifteen: “Pandora’s Box” Chapter Sixteen: “Out of Love” Author’s Note Acknowledgments Notes Index Copyright About the Publisher Prologue STEPHEN MILLER WAS CENTER STAGE. He grinned at the sea of red baseball caps in the San Diego Convention Center on May 27, 2016. In a slim suit with a pocket square, he adjusted the podium microphone and told spectators that his boss—the man who would “save” the country—was about to come out. The crowd erupted. “Are you ready to secure that border?” Miller asked, lifting a finger in the air. “Are you ready to stop Islamic terrorism? And are you ready to make sure that American children are given their birthright in their own country?” Miller could hardly contain himself. He rocked back and forth on his heels. He swung side to side. Long dismissed as a sideshow, the svelte pale thirty-year-old was months from becoming one of the most powerful people in the US government. He coaxed cheers from thousands in his home state of California, where once he had faced hisses and boos. “I want you to shout so loud that all the people who betrayed you can hear you!” he cried. “Every single person who’s beaten you down, and ignored you, and said that you were wrong, and mocked and demeaned and scorned you, every person who’s lectured you sanctimoniously while living the high life in DC —shout so loud that their conference tables will shake!” Outside the convention center, more than a thousand people had gathered to protest Trump’s campaign as xenophobic, racist and sexist. They waved signs exclaiming BULLY and BIGOT. They were upset about Trump’s characterizations of Mexicans as “rapists” and “criminals” and his call for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.” Trump’s fans confronted his critics, ready to brawl. A white man spat the N-word in a black man’s face. Someone screamed “Hitler!” A paunchy Trump supporter with a bullhorn told black men they were going to Hell. “You hate Trump! You despise God!” he said. One responded: “God is black!” The white man replied, “God’s not black!” He continued, “When God puts you in Hell, you’re not gonna play the race card with him.” He added, mockingly, “I’m just a minority member! I’m just a minority member!” Trump took the stage. He called his rally a “lovefest.” He said people protesting were “thugs.” The magnate lamented all of the “young children killed by illegal immigrants.” He had hired Miller as a speechwriter and senior policy advisor a few months before. The California native helped craft Trump’s attacks on Mexicans and Muslims, drawing from dubious sources, such as research bankrolled by eugenicists and white nationalist websites and texts. He was inspired in part by The Camp of the Saints, a virulently racist book by French author Jean Raspail that depicted “the end of the white world” after it was overrun by the Third World, with refugees described as “a single, solid mass, like some gigantic beast with a million legs.”1 The title of the novel comes from the Christian Bible’s Book of Revelation, in which Satan and his armies “marched up over the broad plain of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints,” God’s beloved city, “but fire came down from heaven and consumed them.” Outside, the racially charged tension and vitriol reached fever pitch. People threw punches. They lit rags on fire. Objects flew. Police showed up in riot gear, wielding batons, and declared an unlawful assembly. “If you refuse to move, chemical agents and other weapons will be used,” authorities declared in Spanish and English. Helicopters buzzed overhead, the skies turned from blue to gray. People linked arms, determined to stay. By the time the sun set over the bay, dozens of people were handcuffed and jailed. It’s impossible to understand the Trump era, with its unparalleled polarization, without tracing Miller’s journey to the White House. Miller is the architect of Trump’s border and immigration policies. Prematurely balding and with a penchant for bespoke suits, he has long, articulate fingers that fit a man often depicted as a behind-the-scenes puppeteer. Many are baffled at how someone so young, with little policy or legal expertise, gained so much power—outlasting and overtaking his mentor, Stephen K. Bannon, Trump’s former chief strategist. Before joining Trump, Miller was communications director for Senator Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III. He had little other work experience. But it’s no accident that a public relations flack guides Trump’s central agenda. Trump has long derived power from mythmakers. Author Tony Schwartz made him an American business icon in The Art of the Deal. Producer Mark Burnett turned him into a reality TV star in The Apprentice. Bannon turned him into an alt-right hero on the blog Breitbart. Miller helped make him president. In a White House where people are frequently forced out, Miller has survived. Revered by towering figures on the far right—such as radio host Rush Limbaugh—he has been vilified by the left, compared to Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels and the fictional cave-dwelling creature Gollum. Despite calls for his resignation, he has clung to his office in the West Wing. He grasps Trump’s grudges and goals. Both are showmen. Both enjoy Las Vegas casinos. They owe early affluence to fathers in real estate. Miller flexes loyalty to Trump on TV, attacking critics with a ferocious barrage of verbiage that emerges in complete paragraphs. Both have publicly relished the thought of causing pain and death to criminals. When five black and Latino youth were falsely accused of beating and raping a white woman in Central Park in 1989, Trump paid for full-page ads prior to their wrongful conviction, calling for the “crazed misfits” to be executed. “I want to hate these muggers and murderers,” he wrote. At Duke University in 2005, Miller wrote in favor of the death penalty, saying he’d take rapists apart “piece by piece” by hand.2 Both men have a taste for the morbid. From the campaign trail to the White House, Miller helped Trump conjure an “invasion” of “animals” come to steal American jobs and spill American blood. He repeatedly beat the drum about the gang Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13), casting the border crisis as a battle between good and evil. Many MS-13 members had tattoos of devil horns and the calling code for El Salvador, 503, on their biceps and backs. The gang formed in Miller’s home county of Los Angeles. They comprised less than one percent of gang members in America, but Miller was obsessed with them. The young men partook in the bloodshed of dark fairy tales, luring victims into the forest and using blunt weapons. Miller wrote them into his boss’s speeches again and again. From Long Island to DC to the West Coast, Trump invoked their horror-movie crimes. He said, “They butcher those little girls. They kidnap, they extort, they rape and they rob. They prey on children. They shouldn’t be here. They stomp on their victims. They beat them with clubs. They slash them with machetes, and they stab them with knives . They’re animals.” The demonization of migrants is to Miller what the border wall is to Trump: a tool with which to mobilize the base. With it, he sold cruelty and castigation toward brown youths: separating migrant children from parents; revoking protections for people brought to the US as children; incarcerating teenagers with tenuous ties to MS-13; and more. Trump said “alien minors” were “a great cost to life.” The nation stomached invisible barricades against families who broke no laws: the suspension of travel from Muslim- majority countries; slashing refugee admissions, mostly from African and Asian countries; cutting off Central American access to US asylum; restricting green cards to the poor. Collectively, those actions choked off legal entries of non-white people and torched America’s reputation as a haven for the persecuted. Miller narrowed the focus of the Department of Homeland Security, with its mandate to protect America from cyber threats and terrorism, to sift out the desperate and the destitute. Miller and Trump are masters of messaging. But like sorcerers who lost control of their spells, they denied any role in the rising tide of white rage. They were not directing Patrick Crusius as he allegedly walked into a Walmart in El Paso with an assault rifle, imagining he was saving the United States from “a Hispanic invasion,” and massacred twenty-two people. They did not tell Robert Bowers to murder eleven people at a synagogue in Pittsburgh, one of the federal hate crimes a grand jury has accused him of committing. They did not suggest James Fields Jr. crash his Dodge Challenger into liberal protestors in Charlottesville, Virginia, killing an innocent woman, shattering bones and bloodying dozens of bystanders. But the duo packaged the hate that fuels white terrorism and sold it like cotton candy at an amusement park.
Recommended publications
  • November/December 2008, Vol 17
    SPECIAL EDITION Fall Conference • Top Urban Educator, p.2 • Immigration Issues, p. 3 • Conference Pictorial, p.9 • Ballot Results, p.10 The Nation’s Voice for Urban Education November/December 2008 Vol. 17, No. 8 www.cgcs.org New President Focus of Town Hall Meeting HOUSTON—Urban school leaders hosting the Council conference, called voiced their thoughts on “An Urban Edu- for national standards to measure school cation Agenda for the New President,” performance. “We can’t have a federal ac- the topic of a national town hall meeting countability system without national stan- held in conjunction with the Council of dards,” he stressed. the Great City Schools’ 52nd Annual Fall Lisa Graham Keegan, senior education Conference, Oct. 22-26, in Texas’ largest adviser to Sen. John McCain’s campaign, Letter to New President city. (View Town Hall Meeting) said that McCain does not believe in im- A packed ballroom of educators heard plementing mandatory national standards. HOUSTON—The Council of the from a panel that included education advis- Jonathan Schnur, who represented then- Great City Schools issued an Open Let- ers of the two presidential candidates, who Senator and now President-elect Barack ter to the Next President of the United faced off in a lively 90-minute discussion Obama, noted that Obama wants more States at its Fall Conference here. The moderated by noted journalist Dan Rather, consistency around high standards, and letter, featured in its entirety on page 6, global correspondent and managing editor wants to work with states and the federal reaches out to President-elect Barack of Dan Rather Reports on HDNet.
    [Show full text]
  • Primer on Anti-Immigrant Movement
    October 15, 2015 Dear friends and colleagues, Anti-immigrant extremists are again pushing the GOP -- and the country -- toward zero- immigration policies. Their current standard-bearer, GOP presidential primary candidate Donald Trump, derives his immigration policy prescriptions almost verbatim from those posited by groups such as FAIR, CIS, Numbers USA and others like them. They have consistently opposed and undermined reasonable attempts to reform immigration policy. They will keep doing it, whether or not Mr. Trump captures the GOP presidential nomination. We believe that it’s in the best interest of immigration reformers, corporate America and the country to step up efforts to expose the nativist groups’ influence on policy formation, on the media, on the political process and on the government. Sunshine is, after all, the best disinfectant. It is especially important that the larger public know about the links these groups have to population control groups, in particular to proponents of eugenics. Only by exposing them can the process of marginalizing and ultimately defeating them take root. We hope that the enclosed report will deepen understanding of the politics of immigration reform and galvanize anew commitments to an inclusive, fair-minded and welcoming America. Feel free to share widely: we welcome your ideas, critique and suggestions. Rick Swartz ([email protected]) and Jocelyn McCalla ([email protected]) FROM KNOW-NOTHINGS1 TO KKK TO TANTON TO TRUMP PRIMER ON THE ANTI-IMMIGRANT FORCES DETERMINED TO HIJACK AMERICAN POLITICS By Rick Swartz and Jocelyn McCalla2 October 15, 2015 Anti-immigrant extremists are again pushing the GOP -- and the country -- towards zero- immigration policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Jay-Richards-Longer
    Jay W. Richards, Ph.D., is author of many books including the New York Times bestsellers Infiltrated (2013) and Indivisible (2012). He is also the author of Money, Greed, and God, winner of a 2010 Templeton Enterprise Award; and co-author of The Privileged Planet with astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez. Richards is an Assistant Research Professor in the School of Business and Economics at The Catholic University of America and a Senior Fellow at the Discovery Institute. In recent years he has been Distinguished Fellow at the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, Contributing Editor of The American at the American Enterprise Institute, a Visiting Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, and Research Fellow and Director of Acton Media at the Acton Institute. Richards’ articles and essays have been published in The Harvard Business Review, Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, Washington Post, Forbes, The Daily Caller, Investor’s Business Daily, Washington Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Huffington Post, The American Spectator, The Daily Caller, The Seattle Post- Intelligencer, and a wide variety of other publications. He is a regular contributor to National Review Online, Christian Research Journal, and The Imaginative Conservative. His topics range from culture, economics, and public policy to natural science, technology, and the environment. He is also creator and executive producer of several documentaries, including three that appeared widely on PBS—The Call of the Entrepreneur, The Birth of Freedom, and The Privileged Planet. Richards’ work has been covered in The New York Times (front page news, science news, and editorial), The Washington Post (news and editorial), The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Times, Nature, Science, Astronomy, Physics Today, Reuters, The Chronicle of Higher Education, American Enterprise, Congressional Quarterly Researcher, World, National Catholic Register, and American Spectator.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Day Sporting Memorabilia Auction - Day 2 Tuesday 14 May 2013 10:30
    Two Day Sporting Memorabilia Auction - Day 2 Tuesday 14 May 2013 10:30 Graham Budd Auctions Ltd Sotheby's 34-35 New Bond Street London W1A 2AA Graham Budd Auctions Ltd (Two Day Sporting Memorabilia Auction - Day 2) Catalogue - Downloaded from UKAuctioneers.com Lot: 335 restrictions and 144 meetings were held between Easter 1940 Two framed 1929 sets of Dirt Track Racing cigarette cards, and VE Day 1945. 'Thrills of the Dirt Track', a complete photographic set of 16 Estimate: £100.00 - £150.00 given with Champion and Triumph cigarettes, each card individually dated between April and June 1929, mounted, framed and glazed, 38 by 46cm., 15 by 18in., 'Famous Dirt Lot: 338 Tack Riders', an illustrated colour set of 25 given with Ogden's Post-war 1940s-50s speedway journals and programmes, Cigarettes, each card featuring the portrait and signature of a including three 1947 issues of The Broadsider, three 1947-48 successful 1928 rider, mounted, framed and glazed, 33 by Speedway Reporter, nine 1949-50 Speedway Echo, seventy 48cm., 13 by 19in., plus 'Speedway Riders', a similar late- three 1947-1955 Speedway Gazette, eight 8 b&w speedway 1930s illustrated colour set of 50 given with Player's Cigarettes, press photos; plus many F.I.M. World Rider Championship mounted, framed and glazed, 51 by 56cm., 20 by 22in.; sold programmes 1948-82, including overseas events, eight with three small enamelled metal speedway supporters club pin England v. Australia tests 1948-53, over seventy 1947-1956 badges for the New Cross, Wembley and West Ham teams and Wembley
    [Show full text]
  • The Rules of #Metoo
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2019 Article 3 2019 The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Clarke, Jessica A. (2019) "The Rules of #MeToo," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2019 , Article 3. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2019/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized editor of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke† ABSTRACT Two revelations are central to the meaning of the #MeToo movement. First, sexual harassment and assault are ubiquitous. And second, traditional legal procedures have failed to redress these problems. In the absence of effective formal legal pro- cedures, a set of ad hoc processes have emerged for managing claims of sexual har- assment and assault against persons in high-level positions in business, media, and government. This Article sketches out the features of this informal process, in which journalists expose misconduct and employers, voters, audiences, consumers, or professional organizations are called upon to remove the accused from a position of power. Although this process exists largely in the shadow of the law, it has at- tracted criticisms in a legal register. President Trump tapped into a vein of popular backlash against the #MeToo movement in arguing that it is “a very scary time for young men in America” because “somebody could accuse you of something and you’re automatically guilty.” Yet this is not an apt characterization of #MeToo’s paradigm cases.
    [Show full text]
  • 19810712 Overseas Final.Xlsx
    London White City Season 1981 Compiled by Dave Allan First published May 2019 White City: World Championship Overseas Final Sunday 12th July 1981 TOT POS 1. Les Collins (Leicester & England) 3 0 2 1 1 7 11th (Qualified for Intercontinental Final as reserve) 2. Scott Autrey (Poole & U.S.A.) 1 0 2 0 1 4 3. Phil Herne (Leicester & Australia) 0 0 R R R 0 4. Michael Lee (King's Lynn & England) 2 2 0 2 3 9 6th = (Qualified for Intercontinental Final) 5. Ivan Mauger (Hull & New Zealand) 3 1 1 1 2 8 9th = (Qualified for Intercontinental Final) 6. Ian Cartwright (Halifax & England) 0 2 0 0 2 4 7. Chris Morton (Belle Vue & England) 2 1 3 2 3 11 2nd (Qualified for Intercontinental Final) 8. Steve Bastable (Swindon & England) 1 1 1 3 0 6 9. Bruce Penhall (Cradley Heath & U.S.A.) 3 2 2 3 FX 10 3rd (after RO) (Qualified for Intercontinental Final) 10. John Louis (Halifax & England) 0 1 2 3 3 9 6th = (Qualified for Intercontinental Final) 11. Larry Ross (Belle Vue & New Zealand) 2 3 3 1 0 9 6th = (Qualified for Intercontinental Final) 12. Danny Kennedy (Poole & Australia) 1 0 0 0 1 2 13. Kelly Moran (Eastbourne & U.S.A.) 1 3 1 2 3 10 4th (after RO) (Qualified for Intercontinental Final) 14. Dave Jessup (King's Lynn & England) 3 3 3 3 1 13 1st (Qualified for Intercontinental Final) 15. Dennis Sigalos (Ipswich & U.S.A.) 2 2 3 1 2 10 5th (after RO) (Qualified for Intercontinental Final) 16.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy
    Mount Rushmore: The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy Brian Asher Rosenwald Wynnewood, PA Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2009 Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August, 2015 !1 © Copyright 2015 by Brian Asher Rosenwald All Rights Reserved August 2015 !2 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the many people without whom this project would not have been possible. First, a huge thank you to the more than two hundred and twenty five people from the radio and political worlds who graciously took time from their busy schedules to answer my questions. Some of them put up with repeated follow ups and nagging emails as I tried to develop an understanding of the business and its political implications. They allowed me to keep most things on the record, and provided me with an understanding that simply would not have been possible without their participation. When I began this project, I never imagined that I would interview anywhere near this many people, but now, almost five years later, I cannot imagine the project without the information gleaned from these invaluable interviews. I have been fortunate enough to receive fellowships from the Fox Leadership Program at the University of Pennsylvania and the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia, which made it far easier to complete this dissertation. I am grateful to be a part of the Fox family, both because of the great work that the program does, but also because of the terrific people who work at Fox.
    [Show full text]
  • NAHJ to Honor the Best Journalism of the Year
    NAHJ to Honor the Best Journalism of the Year Community 2008-09-12 10:32:12 Washington, D.C. (CapitalWire PR) September 12, 2008-- Winners of the prestigious ñ Awards and the NAHJ Journalism Awards to be honored at the 2008 Noche de Triunfos gala set for Sept. 12 at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. Maria Hinojosa, a radio, print and TV journalist and book author, and Fernando Diaz, a bilingual investigative reporter at The Chicago Reporter, are among the journalists who will receive the prestigious ñ Awards Friday night from the National Association of Hispanic Journalists. They will receive the Leadership Award and Emerging Journalist Award, respectively. Others honored with ñ Awards include: Diana Washington Valdez of El Paso Times for her stories giving a resounding voice to the powerless, in particular women in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico. Ray Chavez of the Oakland Tribune for his photos that beautifully chronicled the lives of Guatemalans and also immigrants working as day laborers in the San Francisco Bay Area, and for mentorship of young Latino photojournalists. Jim Avila of ABC News for his work as senior law and justice correspondent on an enterprising team that delivers compelling justice stories and shines light on injustices in the legal system. They will receive the Frank del Olmo Print Journalist of the Year Award, the Photojournalist of the Year Award and the Broadcast Journalist of the Year Award, respectively. All the ñ Award recipients and winners in other categories will be honored during the 23rd Annual Noche de Triunfos Journalism Awards Gala on Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nativist Lobby Three Faces of Intolerance
    The Nativist Lobby Three Faces of Intolerance A Report from the Southern Poverty Law Center Montgomery, Alabama February 2009 The Nativist Lobby Three Faces of Intolerance By Heidi BeiricH • edited By Mark Potok the southern poverty law center is a nonprofit organization that combats hate, intolerance and discrimination through education and litigation. Its Intelligence Project, which prepared this report and also produces the quarterly investigative magazine Intelligence Report, tracks the activities of hate groups and the nativist movement and monitors militia and other extremist anti- government activity. Its Teaching Tolerance project helps foster respect and understanding in the classroom. Its litigation arm files lawsuits against hate groups for the violent acts of their members. MEDIA AND GENERAL INQUIRIES Mark Potok, Editor Heidi Beirich Southern Poverty Law Center 400 Washington Ave., Montgomery, Ala. (334) 956-8200 www.splcenter.org • www.intelligencereport.org • www.splcenter.org/blog This report was prepared by the staff of the Intelligence Project of the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Center is supported entirely by private donations. No government funds are involved. © Southern Poverty Law Center. All rights reserved. southern poverty law center Table of Contents Preface 4 The Puppeteer: John Tanton and the Nativist Movement 5 FAIR: The Lobby’s Action Arm 9 CIS: The Lobby’s ‘Independent’ Think Tank 13 NumbersUSA: The Lobby’s Grassroots Organizer 18 southern poverty law center Editor’s Note By Mark Potok Three Washington, D.C.-based immigration-restriction organizations stand at the nexus of the American nativist movement: the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), and NumbersUSA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Duke Community Standard in Practice: a Guide for Undergraduates
    The Duke Community Standard in Practice: A Guide for Undergraduates Duke Community2012-2013 Standard in Practice 1 UNIVERSITY’S MISSION STATEMENT James B. Duke's founding Indenture of Duke University directed the members of the University to “provide real leadership in the educational world” by choosing individuals of “outstanding character, ability, and vision” to serve as its officers, trustees and faculty; by carefully selecting students of “character, determination and application;” and by pursuing those areas of teaching and scholarship that would “most help to develop our resources, increase our wisdom, and promote human happiness.” To these ends, the mission of Duke University is to provide a superior liberal education to undergraduate students, attending not only to their intellectual growth but also to their development as adults committed to high ethical standards and full participation as leaders in their communities; to prepare future members of the learned professions for lives of skilled and ethical service by providing excellent graduate and professional education; to advance the frontiers of knowledge and contribute boldly to the international community of scholarship; to promote an intellectual environment built on a commitment to free and open inquiry; to help those who suffer, cure disease, and promote health, through sophisticated medical research and thoughtful patient care; to provide wide ranging educational opportunities, on and beyond our campuses, for traditional students, active professionals and life-long learners using the power of information technologies; and to promote a deep appreciation for the range of human difference and potential, a sense of the obligations and rewards of citizenship, and a commitment to learning, freedom and truth.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Ethics
    (continued from front fl ap) Henn THERE’S A $60.00 USA/$72.00 CAN When the facts are all out, Bernie Madoff “NEW NORMAL” probably did not get up one morning and A Case Study Approach say, “I think I will reconstruct the original IN BUSINESS ETHICS A Case Study Approach Ponzi scheme and defraud investors.” For the vast majority of companies ruined by ethics Despite all the words and regulations aimed at building ethical and responsible BUSINESS scandals, there was something small that organizations, observed misbehavior has increased—think of the Siemens scandal eventually snowballed into an out-of-control and Bernie Madoff. Business Ethics: A Case Study Approach confronts the brutal BUSINESS situation. Business Ethics: A Case Study fact about business ethics as it exists today—it’s not working. BUSINESS ETHICS Approach is, now more than ever, essential reading for senior leaders of organizations, This stirring casebook powerfully draws a direct line between ethics and business I n the seven years since Enron exploded, it trustees, managing partners, government performance—that is, the sounder your company’s ethical foundation, the seems little has changed. The fi nancial crisis, offi cials, and anyone tasked with a duty— stronger it will perform in brand recognition, sales, customer satisfaction and the seemingly intractable problems facing loyalty, employee productivity, and even in reduced regulatory burdens. fi duciary or otherwise—to prevent that Detroit, and the bribery scandal that resulted “something small” from happening in the in an $800 million fi ne for Siemens, to name fi rst place. So, how can you develop leadership that sets the right a few have altered the business landscape tone at the top? for the foreseeable future.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and DOMINION
    Case 1:21-cv-02130-CJN Document 1 Filed 08/10/21 Page 1 of 213 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) US DOMINION, INC., DOMINION ) VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., and ) DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS ) CORPORATION ) c/o Cogency Global ) 1025 Vermont Ave, NW, Ste. 1130 ) Washington, DC 20005, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) HERRING NETWORKS, INC., d/b/a ) ONE AMERICA NEWS NETWORK ) 101 Constitution Ave., NW ) Washington, DC 20001, ) ) CHARLES HERRING ) 17353 Circa Oriente ) Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067, ) ) ROBERT HERRING, SR. ) 4289 Rancho Las Brisas Trail ) San Diego, California 92130, ) ) CHANEL RION ) 3211 Cherry Hill Lane, NW ) Washington, DC 20007, ) ) and ) ) CHRISTINA BOBB ) 565 Pennsylvania Ave., NW ) Apt. 803 ) Washington, DC 20001, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case 1:21-cv-02130-CJN Document 1 Filed 08/10/21 Page 2 of 213 COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL April 18, 2021: “‘The majority of people [at OAN] did not believe the voter fraud claims being run on the air.’ . Mr. Golingan, the producer, said some OAN employees had hoped Dominion would sue the channel. ‘A lot of people said, “This is insane, and maybe if they sue us, we’ll stop putting stories like this out,”’ he said.” Former OAN Producer Marty Golingan, quoted in the New York times, and fired by OAN the day after the statements were published 1. On the actual facts, the November 2020 election was a huge success for Dominion. In jurisdiction after jurisdiction, in 28 states, in the midst of a highly disruptive pandemic, Dominion’s voting machines facilitated efficient and reliable voting with accurate tallying of votes.
    [Show full text]