DOCSLIB.ORG

Jay-Richards-Longer

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jay-Richards-Longer Jay W. Richards, Ph.D., is author of many books including the New York Times bestsellers Infiltrated (2013) and Indivisible (2012). He is also the author of Money, Greed, and God, winner of a 2010 Templeton Enterprise Award; and co-author of The Privileged Planet with astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez. Richards is an Assistant Research Professor in the School of Business and Economics at The Catholic University of America and a Senior Fellow at the Discovery Institute. In recent years he has been Distinguished Fellow at the Institute for Faith, Work & Economics, Contributing Editor of The American at the American Enterprise Institute, a Visiting Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, and Research Fellow and Director of Acton Media at the Acton Institute. Richards’ articles and essays have been published in The Harvard Business Review, Wall Street Journal, Barron’s, Washington Post, Forbes, The Daily Caller, Investor’s Business Daily, Washington Times, The Philadelphia Inquirer, The Huffington Post, The American Spectator, The Daily Caller, The Seattle Post- Intelligencer, and a wide variety of other publications. He is a regular contributor to National Review Online, Christian Research Journal, and The Imaginative Conservative. His topics range from culture, economics, and public policy to natural science, technology, and the environment. He is also creator and executive producer of several documentaries, including three that appeared widely on PBS—The Call of the Entrepreneur, The Birth of Freedom, and The Privileged Planet. Richards’ work has been covered in The New York Times (front page news, science news, and editorial), The Washington Post (news and editorial), The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Times, Nature, Science, Astronomy, Physics Today, Reuters, The Chronicle of Higher Education, American Enterprise, Congressional Quarterly Researcher, World, National Catholic Register, and American Spectator. An experienced public speaker, Richards has appeared on several hundred radio and television programs, including Larry King Live (CNN), Huckabee, Dayside, Fox and Friends, Studio B with Shepard Smith (Fox News), Glenn Beck TV, Yahoo Finance, Life Today, PBS, CBN, and TBN, The Michael Medved Show, The Mitch Albom Show, The Thom Hartmann Program, The Dennis Prager Show, Linda Chavez, The Mark Davis Show, The Bible Answer Man, Janet Parshall’s America, Al Kresta, Teresa Tomeo, Drew Mariani, Cardinal Dolan, and many others. He has lectured at conferences as diverse as the Western Economic Association, Intercollegiate Studies Institute, and the Evangelical Theological Society; on dozens of college and university campuses; at think tanks, including the Cato Institute, the American Enterprise Institute, the Foundation for Economic Education, the New America Foundation and the Heritage Foundation; at numerous public policy meetings, such as the Heritage Resource Bank, the Council for National Policy, and the Atlas Freedom Forum; in Christian forums such as Legatus and Catholic Professionals, and on several occasions to members of the U.S. Congress and U.S. congressional staff. In January 2008, his debate with the late Christopher Hitchens at Stanford University, moderated by Ben Stein and Michael Cromartie, was broadcast live to several hundred North American churches by the Church Communications Network. Richards has a Ph.D., with honors, in philosophy and theology from Princeton Theological Seminary. He also has an M.Div. (Master of Divinity), a Th.M. (Master of Theology), and a B.A. with majors in Political Science and Religion. He lives with his family in the Washington DC Metro area. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Firemen Reflect on Accord -Maoannb PULLOUT Gcction Mood Inside Buckland Station Is Gloomy
    m If79. HlOfI Mmln0. M l f m . ' LiMaron, 4 ofuomoffe, ». v«ryef«OA. 6 4M W «v- r wMkCfuM. 7f, ^ » w « r brok*^ ofr, •Mtta. Em«f- Wofl. M7-0M7 P. TifSildrinsr) lin M tp o m r broKM. 31k. ndlffon. 646- iHmtrbrfitrr Hrralb ) Vnrhfistfir A C'ty nf VilUqp ^,h.^rr^^ m . 6ootf . Mutt MU. M7-1130. » T X t . LtOttMTlnf*- :k finftb/ lodr 12,m . Dtllofi Saturday, Juna 2 7 ,19 2 7 SOCama 2145. ;ronk-u0 t«nt xetlltnt com M pt 3. Fur* )v«, orxJ led ln« 32400 or ROSS VERDICT: DEATH . Call aftor 6. ■y Linde ftoweff the Assoefeted Fress Inside: MLE BRIDOEFORT - MiciMel B. R«m , eonffeted/ons Sof merder- inG four t«en*sfs fM s, on rridsy Evcryona thouGht tho beesino die flrtt person con­ knock on tho Jury room door demned to (Be in Comiectlciit's at 6:66 p.m. Fridi^ Just moant eleetrle eheir since the U.S. tho Jurors wanted to go homo dupreme Cotm upheld the death and rosumo doliboratlona penalty In 1373. next weak. But it didn't ntoan Lawyers for the 27*year*old that — It moant tho Jury had serial killer said they would doekfod that Miohaol B. Rosa appeal the sentence. should bo oontoneod to daath In tho olootrlo chair. The Cornell University Gradu­ ate and former Insurance sales­ Ity man from Orlswold heard the verdict from a 12-memtier Jury A Jury's vordict Friday that that deliberated four hours before Miehaol B. Ro m should Go to ifiMdaisM, concludinG the killinGs were tho oloctrlo chair for tho mnm "espedally cruel, heinous and murders of four younG women CE depraved." evoked praise for tho Jurors' ThoM are the aGGravatinG couraGe, cntlclsm of Connec­ factors necessary for the death ticut's death penalty statute sentence to be Imposed under and predictions Ross will Connecticut law.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Annual Report
    SEATTLE CHANNEL 2009 Annual Report In 2009, SEATTLE CHANNEL continued to provide top-flight service to Seattle residents by cablecasting and webcasting a variety of programming that informs and inspires its viewers. SEATTLE CHANNEL features comprehensive gavel-to-gavel coverage of the City of Seattle government; educational and dynamic public affairs; and inspirational community and arts programming. In addition, SEATTLE CHANNEL produces an innovative and sophisticated website. Moreover, all of this quality content is produced by a modest-sized staff operating with a lean budget. Highlights of the last year include: • SEATTLE CHANNEL won 28 awards in the National Association of Telecommunications Officers and Advisors’ (NATOA) Government Programming Awards including, for the third year in a row, first place for a Government Access Station Web Site. • In the last year, SEATTLE CHANNEL continued its commitment to the most thorough coverage of Seattle’s local government of any television outlet. • SEATTLE CHANNEL’s website received 5.6 million visits last year, with around 500,000 visitors streaming or downloading videos. • By working out distribution agreements, SEATTLE CHANNEL began showing some of its programs, including Book Lust, Art Zone and American Podium, on Federal Way TV and Burien TV. • SEATTLE CHANNEL added its own blog—Take21—to its website features. • Since the beginning of 2009, SEATTLE CHANNEL has been featured in 65 media outlets from small blogs to major websites and newspapers including The Seattle Times, Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Puget Sound Business Journal, Crosscut, Seattle Post Globe, Publicola and many others. • SEATTLE CHANNEL partnered with CityClub and Town Hall to host a 90-minute, multi-media, interactive live call-in show hosted by C.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Agreement and Disagreement Among Movie Reviewers Alan Agresti & Larry Winner Version of Record First Published: 20 Sep 2012
    This article was downloaded by: [University of Florida] On: 08 October 2012, At: 16:45 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK CHANCE Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ucha20 Evaluating Agreement and Disagreement among Movie Reviewers Alan Agresti & Larry Winner Version of record first published: 20 Sep 2012. To cite this article: Alan Agresti & Larry Winner (1997): Evaluating Agreement and Disagreement among Movie Reviewers, CHANCE, 10:2, 10-14 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09332480.1997.10542015 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy
    Mount Rushmore: The Rise of Talk Radio and Its Impact on Politics and Public Policy Brian Asher Rosenwald Wynnewood, PA Master of Arts, University of Virginia, 2009 Bachelor of Arts, University of Pennsylvania, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August, 2015 !1 © Copyright 2015 by Brian Asher Rosenwald All Rights Reserved August 2015 !2 Acknowledgements I am deeply indebted to the many people without whom this project would not have been possible. First, a huge thank you to the more than two hundred and twenty five people from the radio and political worlds who graciously took time from their busy schedules to answer my questions. Some of them put up with repeated follow ups and nagging emails as I tried to develop an understanding of the business and its political implications. They allowed me to keep most things on the record, and provided me with an understanding that simply would not have been possible without their participation. When I began this project, I never imagined that I would interview anywhere near this many people, but now, almost five years later, I cannot imagine the project without the information gleaned from these invaluable interviews. I have been fortunate enough to receive fellowships from the Fox Leadership Program at the University of Pennsylvania and the Corcoran Department of History at the University of Virginia, which made it far easier to complete this dissertation. I am grateful to be a part of the Fox family, both because of the great work that the program does, but also because of the terrific people who work at Fox.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Updated: January 2021 Curriculum Vitae Christopher J. Ruhm Home Address: Work Address: 3638 Twin Creeks Road Frank Batten School of Leadership & Public Policy Charlottesville, VA 22901 University of Virginia (336) 254-6307 P.O. Box 400893 [email protected] Charlottesville, VA 22904-4893 (434) 243-3729 [email protected] sites.google.com/view/christopher-ruhm/ Education University of California, Berkeley, Ph.D. 1984 University of California, Berkeley, M.A. 1981 University of California, Davis, B.A. (with highest honors) 1978 Fields of Specialization: Health Economics, Labor Economics, Public Economics Teaching, Research, and Other Experience Professor of Public Policy and Economics, Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy, University of Virginia, 2010-present Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, 2013-2015 Other Responsibilities: Executive Committee, Frank Batten School (2017-2019) Executive Board Member, Center for Health Policy (2014-2016) Contemplative Council/Directing Circle, Contemplative Sciences Center (2014-present) Dean’s Search Committee, Frank Batten School (2013-2014) Fellow, Center for Health Policy (2012-present) Deans Council, Frank Batten School (2012-2013) Personnel Committee (chair), Frank Batten School (2012-2013) Admissions Committee, Frank Batten School (2012-2013) Faculty Search Committee, Frank Batten School (2010-present, committee chair multiple years) Faculty Search Committee, Economics Department (2015-2017) Faculty Senate, UVA (2011-2012) Department of Economics, Joseph M. Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina Greensboro, 1991-2010. (Professor Emeritus, 2011-present, Jefferson- Pilot Excellence Professor of Economics, 1997-2010; Professor of Economics, 1994- 1997; Associate Professor of Economics, 1991-1994.) Other Responsibilities: ruhmcv.pdf Christopher J. Ruhm Page 2 Economics Department Graduate Program Committee (1991-2010).
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Ways to Change the World Glenn Reynolds-Style" (2013)
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Orland Park Public Library (Illinois), 2013 Archive of Challenges to Library Materials 11-13-2013 6 Ways to Change the World Glenn Reynolds-- Style Dave Swindle Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/orland_park_library_challenge Part of the Library and Information Science Commons Recommended Citation Swindle, Dave, "6 Ways to Change the World Glenn Reynolds-Style" (2013). Orland Park Public Library (Illinois), 2013. 53. https://dc.uwm.edu/orland_park_library_challenge/53 This Blog Post is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Orland Park Public Library (Illinois), 2013 by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PJ Lifestyle » 6 Ways to Change the World Glenn Reynolds-Style » Print Page 1 of 21 - PJ Lifestyle - http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle - 6 Ways to Change the World Glenn Reynolds-Style Posted By Dave Swindle On November 12, 2013 @ 6:50 pm In Blogging,Radical Reading Regimen Journal,Writing | 1 Comment This is Week 6 of Season 3 in my new 13 Weeks of Wild Man Writing and Radical Reading Series. Every week day I try to blog about compelling writers, their ideas, and the news cycle’s most interesting headlines. From the primordial, pajamahadeen era of the blogosphere, Glenn Reynolds has been a tremendous influence on untold numbers of writers, bloggers, and New Media troublemakers. While others’ influence has waned and once-dominant voices have now lost their relevance, Glenn has grown brighter as a beacon of hopeful, future-minded light.
    [Show full text]
  • Million Dollar Baby (Spoiler Warning!)
    University of Central Florida STARS On Sport and Society Public History 2-14-2005 Million Dollar Baby (spoiler warning!) Richard C. Crepeau University of Central Florida, [email protected] Part of the Cultural History Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, Other History Commons, Sports Management Commons, and the Sports Studies Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/onsportandsociety University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Commentary is brought to you for free and open access by the Public History at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in On Sport and Society by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Crepeau, Richard C., "Million Dollar Baby (spoiler warning!)" (2005). On Sport and Society. 703. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/onsportandsociety/703 SPORT AND SOCIETY FOR H-ARETE Million Dollar Baby (spoiler warning!) FEBRUARY 14, 2005 I will start today with a warning, something that perhaps I should do more often. The subject today is the film "Million Dollar Baby." If you have not seen the film and intend to see it you may want to stop reading now. Reading this will reveal things you don't want to know before you see the film. Over the past few weeks "Million Dollar Baby" has become a target of the ultraconservative media types like Rush Limbaugh, Michael Medved, and an assortment of those non-spinners who pile-on at FOX. Once the film picked up a bundle of Oscar Nominations the outcry quickened. If you think this is a film promoting assisted suicide or some other liberal agenda, then you did not see the same film as I did.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Evangelical Support For, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 9-1-2020 Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election Joseph Thomas Zichterman Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Political Science Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Zichterman, Joseph Thomas, "Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5570. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7444 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election by Joseph Thomas Zichterman A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Thesis Committee: Richard Clucas, Chair Jack Miller Kim Williams Portland State University 2020 Abstract This thesis addressed the conundrum that 81 percent of evangelicals supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election, despite the fact that his character and comportment commonly did not exemplify the values and ideals that they professed. This was particularly perplexing to many outside (and within) evangelical circles, because as leaders of America’s “Moral Majority” for almost four decades, prior to Trump’s campaign, evangelicals had insisted that only candidates who set a high standard for personal integrity and civic decency, were qualified to serve as president.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Politics
    September 2012 Reader’s Guide: Jewish Politics Election season always brings with it a sudden, brief national J.J. Goldberg fascination with Jewish politics and the Jewish vote. What is it, Senior Columnist, and how does it work? The The Jewish Daily Forward answer is a bit like Hillel's famous explanation of the Torah on one foot: It can be captured in a phrase, but invites a lifetime of study. The short version is, as the late scholar Milton Himmelfarb once said, that Jews earn like Episcopalians and vote like Puerto Ricans. The longer version is the subject of this month's Berman Jewish Policy Archive guide, and the selection of readings offered here only hints at the topic's complexity. It includes not just the vagaries Jewish opinion and voting patterns but the workings of Jewish lobbying, the role of Jews in American public leadership, the triangular relationship between Israel, America and American Jews, the power structures of Jewish communal life, ties and tensions between Jews and other faith and ethnic communities and, perhaps most important—because it infuses all the rest with meaning and purpose—the nature of Jewish social values. Reader’s Guide: Jewish Politics 2 2012 Mark S. Mellman, Aaron Strauss, Kenneth D. Wald An extensive analysis of exit poll data. More information... Reader’s Guide: Jewish Politics 3 2012 Workmen’s Circle/Arbeter Ring 2012 American Jews’ Political Values Survey Steven M. Cohen, Samuel Abrams American Jews today are pointedly more liberal than the overall population, especially on economic issues traditionally considered social justice concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Campus Free-Speech Legislation: History, Progress, and Problems
    ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Campus Free-Speech Legislation: History, Progress, and Problems (APRIL 2018) The report that follows was approved for publication by the Association’s Committee on Government Relations. Claiming that free speech is dying on American • free-speech zones, or areas of a campus to campuses, a conservative think tank has led an effort which protests and other contentious political to push states to adopt a model bill that, in the name activity are confined; of defending campus free speech, risks undermining • speech codes designed to prohibit discrimina- it. This report seeks to understand the context and tory language and hate speech; content of the “campus free-speech” movement, to • safe spaces designed to provide protection for track its influence within state legislatures, and to historically marginalized groups; and draw some conclusions concerning the best ways to • trigger-warning policies intended to alert respond to it. students to course material that could trigger preexisting mental conditions. I. The Context A sense of alarm about recent developments on col- II. The Goldwater Institute lege campuses, particularly among conservatives, has One of the main forces driving the current round of driven the efforts to adopt free-speech bills. Propo- free-speech legislation in the United States is the Gold- nents often lump these developments together under water Institute. The Goldwater Institute is a conserva- the general heading of “political correctness.” Those tive and libertarian think tank founded in 1988. Based most often referred to are in Phoenix, Arizona, it is named after Barry Gold- • protests against campus speakers, some of water, Arizona’s famous Republican senator.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense of the Faith Building a Common Christianity Under Siege
    Fall 2012 | Volume 22 | Number 4 Religion Inside this issue Hearne First Citizen and Antilon: The Carroll-Dulany Debates • Barnett Still the Best Hope • Walker Rachel Carson’s Envi- Liberty ronmental Religion • Liberal Tradition Metropolitan Philip II of Moscow • Sirico & The Role of Profits Christianity under Siege: Building a Common Front in Defense of the Faith An Interview with Metrroopolliitan Hilarioonn A Journal of Religion, Economics, and Culture Editor’s Note He touches on the topic in this inter- The “In the Liberal Tradition” figure is view and how the surge of liberal Prot- Metropolitan Philip II (1507 – 1569). estantism is damaging Christian unity Philip, a martyred Russian Orthodox and cooperation with the Western monk, declared, “If I do not bear witness world. This too, is a topic that is given to the truth, I render myself unworthy far too little attention. of my office as a bishop. If I bow to men’s will, what shall I find to answer “First Citizen and Antilon” by Samuel Christ on the Day of Judgment?” It’s a Hearne is an important piece given the simple yet deep declaration for those in current rise of religious persecution by Church leadership to emulate today as civil authorities in America. The 18th some ecclesiastical leaders are pressured Christianity is the world’s most perse- Century newspaper debate between into bowing to the will and agenda of cuted faith today. Around 200 million Charles Carroll of Carrolton and Daniel contemporary culture. Christians are denied fundamental Dulany helped to advance religious free- human rights solely because of their faith dom, the rights of man, and the nature In light of the ongoing attacks on suc- in Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution– and Devolution–
    JULY 1999 Volume 28, Number 7 IMPRIMISBecause Ideas Have Consequences 27th The Evolution– year and Devolution– of Journalistic Ethics Marianne Jennings 845,000 subscribers Professor of Legal and Ethical Studies Arizona State University Journalists are the eyes and ears of society. arianne Jennings is an They gather, sift, and communicate millions of M award-winning newspaper pieces of information. But as Marianne columnist and radio commenta- Jennings warns, some journalists believe that tor, director of the Joan and the facts are less important than a story that David Lincoln Center for Applied “sells” or that promotes a cause. Ethics, and professor of legal Professor Jennings delivered her remarks at and ethical stud- the February 1999 Center for Constructive ies at Arizona State Alternatives seminar, “The Fourth Estate: A University. With undergrad- History of Journalism,” which was co-hosted by uate and law de- Hillsdale’s newly established Herbert H. Dow II grees from Brig- Program in American Journalism. ham Young Univer- sity, Dr. Jennings lawyer by training and a newspaper col- has written six text- umnist by avocation, I teach ethics at a books, and more business school. People tell me that’s than 130 articles. four oxymorons in one sentence. Her column in the AMy unusual career choices have made me Arizona Republic realize that lawyers, businessmen, and journal- has been reprinted ists wrestle with the same ethical concerns. But by the Wall Street Journal, the Chicago Tribune, and other news- journalists face the greatest challenge. They not papers nationwide. A collection of only have to decide whether to follow a code of her essays, Nobody Fixes Real ethics personally but also whether that code Carrot Sticks Anymore, was pub- should apply to the stories and the subjects they lished in 1994.
    [Show full text]