DOCSLIB.ORG

Stirling Highway, Nedlands [TP 10.00 ] Top Pillar/Post J/N: DATE: SCALE: DRAWN: [TW 10.00 ] C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stirling Highway, Nedlands [TP 10.00 ] Top Pillar/Post J/N: DATE: SCALE: DRAWN: [TW 10.00 ] C SEC Dome OLD 87-89 Guthrie Street, Osborne Park, Western Australia Builder : Content Living the Home Builder Power Pole Telephone: (08) 9446 7361 Facsimile: (08) 9445 2998 AREA T C Phone Pits Email : [email protected] Website: www.cottage.com.au CLIENT : Stirling High Pty Ltd W Water Conn. LOT 7 (#52) Stirling Highway, Nedlands [TP 10.00 ] Top Pillar/Post J/N: DATE: SCALE: DRAWN: [TW 10.00 ] C. Top Wall 442726 18 Sep 18 1:200 LEGEND [TR 10.00 ] Top Retaining Licensed Surveyors c Weightman Diag.70274 [TF 10.00 ] Top Fence PROJECT No. SHEET No. S M01217 01 of 09 Grano / Paving Areas AREA Perimeter SITE PLAN GARAGE 36.64 24.22 DRAWN: ES DATE: OCT 18 E REV # PORCH 1.57 5.02 W SCALE: 1:200 CHK: MH C VARIATION DATE DRAWN 1/SW 21/03/19 ES 2/SW 27/03/19 ES 3/SW 05/04/19 ES PLANS Sewer M/H Sewer Junction N 3,124 15,490 1,500 (8.00) Inv: 7.4 Depth: 0.9 NOTE: UP Gate Brick Wall CONTRACT 8.27 8.77 9.04 Tree Tree These are the plans referred to in the Building Contract Brick Tree Tree Brick Tree Brick .14 Ø 0.2m Ø 0.6m Light 8 Ø 0.2m Ø 0.2m 0 Ø 0.3m CLIENT: Light Ht 10.0m .63 9. Bollard .00 Ht 5.0m Ht 5.0m8.45 8 Ht 5.0m 9 PEG Bollard 8.23 Ht 5.0m 8.30 06Tree CLIENT: . .22 Tap 13 GONE 81 20.12 Tree 23 . 19T .21 . 9 . 9 9 . BEWARE: 8 .32 .48 .56 8 Rocks & Garden Ø 0.3m 9 9 8 8 8 9.37 Ø 0.3m ] 8.29 9.03 ] 9.44 PEG FOUND NUMB BUILDER: .13 Ht 5.0m Stump [TF 10.47 ] 9 Ht 5.0m 90 . FOR LOT TO SIDE 75 Tree Debris . Stump 52 Ø 0.4m DATE: 14 . 90 . Over Conc. 10 9 " 10 0 No further structural changes Brick & Tile 9 Ø 0.4m 0' [TF 11.22] °0 ° TF ' [ 4,000 4,000 © COPYRIGHT Carport Timber & 0 TF 90 PEG " [ 24 9.41 . 02 9.39 40 8 . GONE Pespex FGL 9.15 . FGL 9.15 52 D.P D.P . Stump 6 D.P R35 9 2 9 CLIENT NOTE: ZONING Carport Ø 0.4m GAS HWU ON PROPOSED RETAINING WALL BY 3,124 CONC SLAB 15,490 1,500 T.O.W. NO OWNER 2,020 DAP 8.26 23 @ 9.55 5 . 204 . 9 51 °1 41 ' 9 13 . Paling & " . OWNER TO PROVIDE STRUCTURAL 5,350 38 9 9 VACANT 36 75 . YES . 15 . Lattice . ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION STATING THE 9 STRUCTURE PLAN 8 9 9.39 9 67 22 9.39 TF 11.32 ] WALL HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN . TOP OF EXISTING [ 2,028 . 8 2 FGL ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUPPLIED [TF 155 FENCE @ 10.74 STEP DOWN R'WALL 1044m2 °58 PROPOSED 57 DETAILS AND THAT IT IS SUITABLE TO BLOCK AREA 10 '47 PLUMBER NOTE: . FROM 9.90 TO 9.55 79 . " 9 . 54 SUPPORT ANY PROPOSED LOADS PLACED 8 ] CONDUIT UNDER RESIDENCE 1,500 ON IT PRIOR TO THE BUILDER SLAB FOR D/W GPO FFL 9.25 Fibro Fence (Capped, COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION LEGEND .94 8 223 (RL 9.25) 9.42 Fair Cond.) 2,630 .44 T.O.W. NOTE: NO FORM OF PANEL & POST [TF 10.74 ] 9.0 D.P 9 9.56 TOF - TOP OF FOOTING 40 . @ 9.90 RETAINING IS TO BE USED TO RETAIN 9.05 9.18 D.P 9 01 ] HEIGHTS GREATER THAN 900mm AS THIS TOW - TOP OF WALL Brick/Tile/Galv. 91 [TR 9.39 ] 9 6,200 . WILL AFFECT THE DESIGN OF THE 4,527 93 9 On Slab 78 . TBA - TO BE ADVISED . FOUNDATIONS 9 67 . FGL 11 8 89 'FFL SUBJECT TO CONFIRMATION 25,690 NOTES: 9.15 . PROPOSED RETAINING WALL (S) 9 OF MINISTERS SEWER JUNCTION TW [ BY OWNER PRIOR TO CONST. TERMITE TREATMENT TO BE CHEMICAL POSITION & LEVELS BEING MADE T AVAILABLE' Conc. Wall (SEPERATE APPLICATION) TREATMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL 18 . THE LENGTH OF THE WALLS SHOWN ARE T.O.W. @ 10.20 APPROXIMATE ONLY AND SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTION CODE 2016, PART 3.1.3, PART 10 Fibro Fence (Capped, 67 . CONFIRMED ON SITE BY THE RETAiNING 25 2.1.1 & PART 1.0.7 USING THE TERMICO 8 . Floor WALL CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT PLAN Fair Cond.) 9 SW 1.5 x 1.2 Brick Ret Wall D.P GAS HWU ON SET-OUT PEGS 29 800 MIN Ground Ground CLIENT NOTE: REPAIRS / REINSTATEMENT TO . CONC SLAB BY LICENSED 9 1 DAMAGED KERBS AND / OR FOOTPATHS [TF 10.92 ] 1,300 SW SURVEYOR WHERE NECESSARY IS THE RESPONSIBILITY 1.5 x 1.2 MIN (4 OFF) OF THE OWNER 21,642 .39 TOP OF EXISTING 9 D.P ELECTRICIAN NOTE: Floor D.P 2-Storey Brick CLIENT NOTE: BEWARE OF UNDERGROUND FENCE @ 10.92 ELECTRICIAN TO INSTALL 15 . SUB-METER TO METERBOX First & Tile On Slab SERVICE RUN-INS WHEN DIGGING 9 [TF 11.63 ] GARAGE TO SUIT POWER SUPPLY TO Approx. Top Of FGL REAR DWELLING (REFER TO 3,027 .46 GRANO @ -1c [TF 11.97 ] 9 ADDENDA) CLIENT NOTE: STORMWATER DISPOSAL (BY L'stone Base 9.73 9 (RL. 9.164) . 53 04 . OWNER) SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 18 9 9.48 9.98 . 47 10 44 COMMERCIAL GRADE COUNCIL APPROVED PLANS & CONDITIONS OF . PORCH [TF 11.06 ] 9.98 10 9 GULLY & GRATE PAVED @ -1c APPROVAL AND ANY SPECIFIED STRUCTURAL 97 . CONNECTED TO (RL. 9.614) Approx. House ENGINEER'S REQUIREMENTS (REFER TO 9 SOAKWELL COMB. M'BOX F/L 10.24 5 9.98 70 ADDENDA) . 9 EDGE OF GRANO GAS / ELECT. D.P 10 Brick & Galv. 99 D.P D.P NOTE: SOME BUILDING MATERIALS WILL BE . 0 Extension D.P . PLACED IN THE VERGE RESERVE DURING 1300 MIN 43 10 RGB THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION 4,027 15,490 FGL 9.15 1,500 #50A/B SOAKWELLS SW .99 93 3,500 63 10.18 . BY BUILDER . 9 9 9 Brick & Tile 1.2 x 1.2 ] Conc. Wall NOTE: (IF APPLICABLE) PLASTIC GRATES TO (W X H) 17 . 17 On Limestone 77 . 10 . THE BASE OF THE DOWNPIPES WITH [TF 11.18 ] 10 STORMWATER PIPING TO RUN CLEAR OF [TF 12.03 ] 11 65 65 . TW . [ 9 34 ANY PAVED / CONCRETE AREAS 9 90mm PVC PIPE TURNING BAY . [TW 11.39 ] 10 (RETIC) UNDER (BY OWNER) CLIENT NOTE: BUILDER RECOMMENDS FOR Galv. DRIVEWAY CLIENT TO CONTACT THE ADJOINING LAND Patio (BY OWNER) OWNER TO DISCUSS THEIR PROPOSED SITE Wall 9.77 Pile Of Sand & Pillars LEVELS AS RETAINING MAY BE MINIMISED PAVED DRIVEWAY 93 / . Tree Debris w 18,215 AND / OR ELIMINATED (BY OWNER) 9 Brick .15 OWNER TO REMOVE PILE CLIENT NOTE: REMOVAL AND RE-INSTATEMENT 18,510 10 OF SAND & DEBRIS PRIOR OF FENCING AS NECESSARY BY LAND OWNER/S TO CONSTRUCTION TO BUILDERS SCHEDULE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ROAD WIDENING OWNER TO ORGANISE FOR SETBACK THE BUILDING ACT (2011) OWNER TO LIAISE & 21,556 VACANT BRICK PILLAR & PORTION OF Stump GAIN PERMISSION FROM ADJOINING LAND 22,348 BRICK WALL TO BE REMOVED Ø 0.6m 83 OWNER/S ACCORDINGLY AND GIVE 24 HOURS 83 . & RELOCATED CLEAR OF DRIVEWAY 9 36 9 NOTICE PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL / RE- . PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION . 10 INSTATEMENT OF FENCING 94 Stump . 9 31 Conn . 31 Stump -WIND CLASSIFICATION (N1) . Ø 0.4m 10 32 Pillars 91 . / . 101 W Ø 0.3m AS PER AS 4055 Wall 9 gl) 10 w & Brick 19 (top ° 10 Stump 10. 7 43 /Pillars '30 . w .25 Wall Ø 0.4m " 10 NOTE: ALL DOWNPIPES .0 Wall 10 .28 10 Brick [ 10 gl) TW 53 .01 & 52 . CONNECTED TO 10 (top /Pillars . 10 Brick w Tree 61 .21 10 . 03 10 .21 12 SOAKWELLS WITH PVC . Pillar 10 .36 Ø 0.3m Tree 10 PEG 5 Verge Tree . 09 [TW 11.75 ] 10 10 STORMWATER PIPE BY 10.12 Ht 3.0m Ø 0.1m Ø 0.70m GONE Pillar 10 [TP 11.95 ] Grass ] 00 09 " 35 Ht 2.0m Ht 10.0m BUILDER . .42 . 30 21 10 ' 10 10 52 50 .58 Path 03 ° Footpath . 10 . 47 . Slabs . 10 10.51 78 .26 10 10 Damaged 10 Hydrant DISCLAIMER: Conc .14 4,500 Valve 10.39 (Metal) Due to lack of survey marks/pegs, all building offset 10 1,000 min Mount (Metal) .08 10.20 Non- 10.31 dimensions & features are approximate only and T .10 PEG 10 DISCLAIMER: positioned from existing pegs/fences and walls which 10 .08 10.22 10 Bitumen Survey does not include verification of cadastral may not be on the correct alignment and are to be GONE 10.15 Crossover 1,529 boundaries. All features and levels shown are verified when repegged. Any design that involves .07 Nil based on orientation to existing pegs and fences additions to any structures shown or portion of structures 10 -Mount Of Kerb 15,787 only which may not be on correct cadastral alignment. remaining after any demolition has taken place requires Non Base Nail At .00 m Any designs based or dependent on the location of boundaries to be repegged and exact offsets provided Ref 10 Datum existing features should have those features' to your designer/architect before any plans are produced Assumed Highway 4,105 location verified in relation to the true boundary. and before any work is started on site.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Street Upgrade STIRLING HIGHWAY to CARRINGTON STREET, FREMANTLE
    MAIN ROADS WESTERN AUSTRALIA High Street Upgrade STIRLING HIGHWAY TO CARRINGTON STREET, FREMANTLE The proposed $118 million High Street Upgrade from Carrington Street to Stirling Highway project, jointly funded by the Australian (73.6 million) and State ($44.4 million) governments, is part of the road and rail infrastructure package to improve Perth’s transport network. About the Project • a wide median to separate traffic and The initial concept planned for the preserve a number of mature trees; Key Dates upgrade of High Street, presented to and the community in 2013, is no longer the • a single lane service road for Note the following dates are preferred option. residents north of High Street. subject to change A new draft concept has been Main Roads WA is working closely developed that takes into consideration with the City of Fremantle on the Concept design phase previous feedback from local residents development of the draft concept plan June to November 2018. and to assist in addressing local access and stakeholders as well as recent Late 2018/early 2019: form consultations with the City of Fremantle. issues. Construction Reference Group The current layout of High Street – from Why is this project needed? Carrington Street to the Stirling Highway Tender phase intersection, provides direct access to Currently High Street between several local roads and driveways which Stirling Highway and Carrington The tender will be issued results in stop-start conditions and Street is experiencing significant in October 2018 with the heightened safety risks. This results in traffic congestion impacting on traffic contract award expected to congestion and unpredictable journey efficiencies and safety.
    [Show full text]
  • MRS 1210/41 Stirling Highway Amendment Report
    March 2012 Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation Amendment Report City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands, Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe, Town of Mosman Park and the Shire of Peppermint Grove Metropolitan Region Scheme Amendment 1210/41 Rationalisation of Stirling Highway Reservation Amendment Report City of Fremantle, City of Nedlands, Town of Claremont, Town of Cottesloe, Town of Mosman Park and the Shire of Peppermint Grove March 2012 Disclaimer This document has been published by the Western Australian Planning Commission. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith and on the basis that the Government, its employees and agents are not liable for any damage or loss whatsoever which may occur as a result of action taken or not taken, as the case may be, in respect of any representation, statement, opinion or advice referred to herein. Professional advice should be obtained before applying the information contained in this document to particular circumstances. © State of Western Australia Internet: http://www.wa.gov.au Published by the Western Australian Planning Commission, 140 William Street, Perth Western Australia 6000 MRS Amendment 1210/41 Amendment Report File 809-2-1-91 Pt. 1 Published March 2012 Internet: www.planning.wa.gov.au Email: [email protected] Phone: (08) 655 19000 Fax: (08) 655 19001 National Relay Service: 13 36 77 Infoline: 1800 626 477 This document is available in alternative formats on application to Communications Services. Contents The Metropolitan Region Scheme ..............................................................................v Abbreviations .............................................................................................................ix 1 Purpose ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
    Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway CW1091500 Prepared for Spyglass Media Pty Ltd 27 January 2021 27 January 2021 Cardno i Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway Contact Information Document Information Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd Prepared for Spyglass Media Pty Ltd ABN 77 009 119 000 Project Name Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling 11 Harvest Terrace West Perth WA 6005 Highway Australia File Reference CW1095100-TR-RP-001-B- LFDS 626 Stirling Hwy.docx www.cardno.com Phone +61 8 9273 3888 Job Reference CW1091500 Fax +61 8 9486 8664 Date 27 January 2021 Version Number B Author(s): Raymond Rachmat Effective Date 27/01/2021 Road Safety Auditor Approved By: Sam Laybutt Date Approved 27/01/2021 Senior Road Safety Auditor Document History Version Effective Date Description of Revision Prepared by Reviewed by A 22 Dec 2020 For Issue RR SGL B 27 Jan 2021 Updated Plan RR SGL © Cardno. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno. This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with the terms of the engagement. Cardno does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • 71, !,/!^ O OYBUSW LLMLA TREASURER; MINISTERFORTRANSPOR
    . V I 2110/11'. r ' ^---^---- ---.--^--~ Tre surer; M nisterfor Transp rt; Fisheries ^. Our ref 30-43928 Ms Samantha Parsons Committee Clerk Estimates and Financial Operations Committee Legislative Council Parliament House PERTHWA6000 Dear Ms Parsons Further to the Hon Ken Travers MLC's letter dated 2 December 2013, in relation to the Estimates and Financial Operations Committee 2012-, 3 Agency Annual Report Hearings on Thursday, 25 November 2013, please find attached the responses to the additional questions submitted by Legislative Council Members for Main Roads Western Australia Yours sincerely ^/ 71, !,/!^ o OYBUSW LLMLA TREASURER; MINISTERFORTRANSPOR I 9 DEC 2013 Level, 3, Dumas House, 2 Havelock Street, West Perth, Western Australia, 6005 Telephone' +61 8 6552 6400 Facsimile: +61 8 6552 6401 Email' minister buswell@dpc. wa gov. au ESTIMATES AND FINANCIAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE QUESTIONS ON NOTICE SUPPLEMENTARYINFORMATION Monday, 25 November 2013 Main Roads Western Australia Question NOAi. Hon Keri Travers MLC asked- Whatis the original and new time frame forthe following projects a. CumnAvenue, b. OldMandurah Tramc Bridge; and c. EatonDrive Answer I'~' The changes in the budgeted cash flows for Cumn Avenue, Old Mandurah Traffic Bridge and Eaton Drive Bridge are 20.2^,:;!: 20.3-, 4 20,445 20,546- 20,647 2017-, 8 ($ 000) $ 000 ($ 000) ($ 000) ($ 000 $ 000) Curtin 2 000 5 000 33 000 Avenue Original New I 000 I 000 5 000 20 000 13 000 Old Mandurah 300 I 700 3 000 7 000 28 000 Traffic Original Bridge New 300 300 700 I 700 3 000 34 000 Eaton I Drive Original , 000 17 000 ,, Brid e New I 000 I 000 16 000 Page I ESTIMATESAND FINANCIAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE QUESTIONS ON NOTICE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Monday, 25 November 2013 Main Roads Western Australia Question NOA2.
    [Show full text]
  • Westport Beacon 8 Why Fremantle Can't Handle the Long-Term Freight
    Why Fremantle can’t handle the long-term freight task alone ISSUE 8 | AUGUST 2019 | PORT OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN Image courtesy of Fremantle Ports Fremantle presents It may surprise many people to see that a stand-alone Fremantle option has not made Westport’s shortlist a unique challenge of fve options. Why not? for Westport BUT BEFORE WE BEGIN, it is very important to point out that while Infrastructure Australia, whose Westport’s work shows Fremantle won’t remain Perth’s stand-alone infrastructure assessment process container port for the long-term, the Inner Harbour will continue to be Westport is following, requires Perth’s primary container port until the new port is established. projects to look at optimising Westport is now working on the trigger points and timings around existing infrastructure as the frst when new infrastructure, including the new port, will be required. step before building anything new. A major focus of this work will be identifying the community’stolerance It is accepted that the Inner Harbour levels for increasing amenity impacts, such as traffc congestion and is operating well below its berth or rail noise, as well as industry’s willingness to change their operating shipping capacity, so an assumption practices. However, building a new port takes time and it may take up can be made that Fremantle should to a decade to deliver. remain Perth’s primary container port well into the future. Why spend Additionally, it should be noted that billions of dollars on a new port if Fremantle Ports’ jurisdiction includes it’s not needed? both the Inner and Outer Harbours.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Road Fact Sheet
    1. What are Main Roads and Highways in the Perth metropolitan area? Metropolitan In the Perth metropolitan area, the following highways and main roads (whole or part) are under the care and control of Main Roads Road Fact Sheet Western Australia: Albany Highway Albany Highway – starts at Welshpool Road and finishes at Metropolitan Boundary Armadale Road Starts at Albany Highway and finishes at Kwinana Freeway Brearley Avenue Starts at Great Eastern Highway and finishes at Airport boundary Brookton Starts at Albany Highway and finishes at Highway the Metropolitan Boundary Canning Highway Starts at Causeway and finishes at Stirling Highway Causeway Cockburn Road Starts at Hampton Road and finishes at Russell Road Garratt Road Bridge Great Eastern Starts at Causeway into Johnson Street Highway right at James Street into East Street and right at Great Eastern Highway to Roe Highway intersection and then through Greenmount, Mundaring and past the Lakes Turn-off to the Metropolitan Boundary west of Linley Valley Road Great Eastern Starts at Great Eastern Highway and Highway Bypass finishes at Roe Highway Great Southern Starts at Great Eastern Highway to Highway Metropolitan Boundary approx. 2.5 km Graham Farmer Starts at Tunnel and finishes at Freeway Chamberlain Road Great Northern Starts at Roe Highway to Metropolitan Highway Boundary near parking bay 300 metres south of Brand Highway Guildford Road Starts on south side of bridge over Graham Farmer Freeway on East Parade and finishes at Johnson Street, Guildford High Street Starts at Carrington Street
    [Show full text]
  • St-Hwy-Housing-Study-Put-To-Ocm.Pdf
    Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 Part One: Background ............................................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Town of Claremont Housing Capacity Study....................................................................................... 6 Stirling Highway Activity Corridor Study ............................................................................................. 6 Purpose of this Report ............................................................................................................................ 6 State Government Context ..................................................................................................................... 7 Local Context ........................................................................................................................................... 8 The Study Area ........................................................................................................................................ 9 What the study area includes and why .............................................................................................. 9 General Description ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Notaries Public in Western Australia
    CONSULATE GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES LEVEL 4 16 ST. GEORGES TCE, PERTH WA 6000 [email protected] http://au.uembassy.gov NOTARIES PUBLIC IN WESTERN AUSTRALIA The American Consulate General in Perth assumes no responsibility for the professional ability or integrity of the persons or firms whose names appear in the following list. The names listed are arranged alphabetically by region. The order in which they appear has no other significance. ALBANY Mr. Murray Thornhill Notary Public Hudson Henning &Goodman 49 Peels Place (PO box 5084) Albany, WA 6332 Tel: (08) 9841-2322 Fax: (08) 9841-2489 Email: [email protected] Web: www.hhg.com.au APPLECROSS Mr. Peter Griffin Notary Public suite 4, 1st floor 48 Kishorn Road Applecross, WA 6153 Tel: (08) 9316-2159 Fax: (08) 9364-1053 Email: [email protected] Notaries Public Perth 07/2018 BOORAGOON Mr. David M. Lewis Notary Public Lewis Blyth and Hooper 4th floor Garden City House Booragon, WA 6154 Tel: (08) 9364-9555 Fax: (08) 9364-8812 Email: [email protected] BRIDGETOWN Mr. Howard I. Evans Notary Public 107 Hampton Street (PO Box 433) Bridgetown, WA 6255 Tel: (08) 9761-1619 Fax: (08) 9761-1922 BUNBURY Mr. Edwin Abdo Notary Public 26 Stirling Street Bunbury, WA 6230 Tel: (08) 9791-3280 Fax: (08) 9791-3283 Mr. J. Formby Notary Public Formbys Lawyers 16 Carey Street (PO Box 1233) Bunbury, WA 6230 Tel: (08) 9791-1600 Fax: (08) 9791-1180 Email: [email protected] Website: www.formbyslawyers.com Notaries Public Perth 07/2018 Mr. Clive Young Notary Public Young and Young 5 Spencer Street (PO Box 265) Bunbury, WA 6231 Tel: (08) 9721-4144 Fax: (08) 9721-7006 Email: [email protected] Website: www.yy.com.au CLAREMONT Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Applications Report Version 0.105.4
    Development Assessment Panels All Current Applications Report Version 0.105.4 Form 1 Dev Date Confirmed / Application DAP Application Meeting DAP Panel LG Name DAP at Creation Cost ($ Application Description Property Location Application Actual DAP Meeting Venue Type Reference Number Time Million) Received Meeting Date City of Perth LDAP City of Perth City of Perth LDAP FORM1 DAP/21/02030 $40m Nine (9) Storey Commercial Building Lot 58 (No.78) Mounts Bay Road, Perth 02/07/2021 Metro Inner-North Metro Inner-North City of Bayswater - 61 City of Bayswater FORM1 DAP/21/02033 $70m Mixed Use Development Lot 301 (168) Guildford Road, Maylands 04/07/2021 28/09/2021 09:30 AM JDAP JDAP Broun Avenue, Morley Metro Inner-North City of Nedlands FORM1 DAP/21/02014 $2m 10 Multiple Dwellings Lot 129 (38) Portland Street, Nedlands 07/06/2021 JDAP City of Nedlands -71 Metro Inner-North Lot 52 (11) & Lot 51 (13) Webster Street, FORM1 DAP/21/02013 $7m 12 Grouped Dwellings 08/06/2021 06/09/2021 09:00 AM Stirling Highway, JDAP Nedlands Nedlands Metro Inner-North FORM2 DAP/20/01781 $2.7m 3 Level Multiple Dwelling Development Lot 394 (20) Cooper St, Nedlands 01/09/2021 JDAP Metro Inner-North FORM2 DAP/20/01922 $5.8m Construction of 10 Multiple Dwellings Lot 372 (12) Philip Road, Dalkeith 07/07/2021 JDAP Metro West JDAP FORM2 DAP/19/01606 $20m Expansion of existing data storage facility Lot 15368 (37) Lemnos Street, Shenton Park 05/07/2021 13/09/2021 09:00 AM Zoom Meeting Mixed Use Development (26 Serviced Metro West JDAP SAT DAP/19/01655 $8m Lot 684 (135) Broadway,
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    2019 ANNUAL REPORT CONNECTING PEOPLE AND PLACES Main Roads Annual Report 2019 2 Contents Welcome ....................................................................................................................................................................4 Overview ....................................................................................................................................................................6 Our Stories ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Our Finances ...................................................................................................................................................................11 Our Performance ..........................................................................................................................................................13 Our Outcomes ................................................................................................................................................................14 Commissioner’s Foreword ...........................................................................................................................................17 Managing Director’s Review .........................................................................................................................................18 About Us ..................................................................................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Cottesloe Local Recovery Arrangements As at March 2015
    Town of Cottesloe Local Recovery Arrangements As at March 2015 1. Local Recovery Committee – Executive Membership (Core Recovery Committee) Chairperson Mayor Deputy Chairperson Chief Executive Officer Local Recovery Coordinator Manager Engineering Services Secretary Administration and Governance Officer Core Committee attendees • Chief Executive Officer • Local Emergency Coordinator - WA Police • HMA representative • DCD representative • Town of Cottesloe Finance Manager • Other relevant Town of Cottesloe staff Membership / attendance at the meetings of the ‘Core Recovery Committee’ will be supplemented with specific personnel from Town of Cottesloe service areas or other organisations as necessary. The Core Committee will oversee the community recovery process and will manage the following activity as required during an emergency recovery effort: Financial aid and economic development The Core Committee can choose to coordinate other recovery functions or may convene specialist sub-committees relating to distinct areas of a recovery effort if required. Section 3 below outlines a range of potential sub-committee disciplines and organisations and personnel who could be involved if those sub-committees were activated. Definitions ToC: Town of Cottesloe ICG: Incident Control Group CPFS: Department for Child Protection and Family Support DCD: Department for Community Development DPaW: Department for Parks and Wildlife HMA: Hazard Management Agency RSPCA: Royal Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals SES: State Emergency Service Lifelines: Systems & infrastructure necessary for community operations including electricity, water, food, gas, telecommunications etc 1 2. Local Recovery Coordinator Coordination responsibility will be retained by the Hazard Management Authority (HMA), at the respective level, until response element operations are completed, at which point the HMA will transfer responsibility to the appropriate Recovery Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Impact Assessment Report.Pdf (PDF, 490.79
    Main Roads Western Australia High Street Fremantle Upgrade Project Environmental Impact Assessment October 2018 Limitations and assumptions This report has been prepared by GHD for Main Roads Western Australia (Main Roads) and may only be used and relied on by Main Roads for the purpose agreed between GHD and Main Roads as set out in Section 1.1.5 of this report. GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than Main Roads arising in connection with this report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this report were limited to those specifically detailed in the report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the report. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation to update this report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the report was prepared. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are based on assumptions made by GHD described in this report. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being incorrect. GHD has prepared this report on the basis of information provided by Main Roads and others who provided information to GHD (including Government authorities), which GHD has not independently verified or checked beyond the agreed scope of work. GHD does not accept liability in connection with such unverified information, including errors and omissions in the report which were caused by errors or omissions in that information.
    [Show full text]