Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Road Safety Assessment Report
Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
CW1091500
Prepared for Spyglass Media Pty Ltd
27 January 2021
27 January 2021 Cardno i Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Contact Information Document Information
Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd Prepared for Spyglass Media Pty Ltd ABN 77 009 119 000 Project Name Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling 11 Harvest Terrace West Perth WA 6005 Highway Australia File Reference CW1095100-TR-RP-001-B- LFDS 626 Stirling Hwy.docx www.cardno.com Phone +61 8 9273 3888 Job Reference CW1091500 Fax +61 8 9486 8664 Date 27 January 2021
Version Number B
Author(s):
Raymond Rachmat Effective Date 27/01/2021 Road Safety Auditor
Approved By:
Sam Laybutt Date Approved 27/01/2021 Senior Road Safety Auditor
Document History
Version Effective Date Description of Revision Prepared by Reviewed by
A 22 Dec 2020 For Issue RR SGL B 27 Jan 2021 Updated Plan RR SGL
© Cardno. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to Cardno and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person other than by agreement with Cardno. This document is produced by Cardno solely for the benefit and use by the client in accordance with the terms of the engagement. Cardno does not and shall not assume any responsibility or liability whatsoever to any third party arising out of any use or reliance by any third party on the content of this document. Our report is based on information made available by the client. The validity and comprehensiveness of supplied information has not been independently verified and, for the purposes of this report, it is assumed that the information provided to Cardno is both complete and accurate. Whilst, to the best of our knowledge, the information contained in this report is accurate at the date of issue, changes may occur to the site conditions, the site context or the applicable planning framework. This report should not be used after any such changes without consulting the provider of the report or a suitably qualified person.
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence ii Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Table of Contents
1 Introduction 1 2 LFDS Location and Characteristics 2 2.1 LFDS Location 2 2.2 LFDS Characteristics 2 3 Road Environment and Traffic Volumes 4 4 LFDS Visibility and Driver Sight Lines 5 5 Device Restriction Area 8 5.1 Criteria 8 5.2 Cross Road DRA 9 5.3 Mitigation Measure 10 6 Crash History 11 6.1 Killed and Serious Injury (KSI) Criteria 11 6.2 Crash Rate Criteria 11 7 Assessment Against Main Roads Policy 14 8 Conclusion and Recommendation 16 Appendices
Appendix A LFDS Plan Appendix B Device Restriction Area Appendix C Crash Data Appendix D Traffic Data Appendix E Detailed Crash Calculation
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence iii Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Tables
Table 3-1 Average Mid-Block Traffic Volume 4 Table 6-1 Stirling Highway Northbound Casualty Crash Rate 11
Figures
Figure 2-1 LFDS Location 2 Figure 2-2 Proposed LFDS – View from Stirling Highway Northbound 3 Figure 2-3 LFDS Dimension 3 Figure 4-1 Stirling Highway View Northbound – Left Lane 6 Figure 4-2 Stirling Highway View Northbound – Right Lane 7 Figure 5-1 Relevant DRA for the Proposed LFDS 8 Figure 5-2 Proposed LFDS Location Relative to the Cross – Road DRA 10 Figure 6-1 Comparison of Critical Crash Rate and Stirling Highway Casualty Crash Rate 12 Figure 6-2 Crash clusters identified near the LFDS 13
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence iv Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
1 Introduction
Cardno has been engaged by Spyglass Media Pty Ltd (“the Client”) to prepare a Road Safety Assessment Report for the installation of a Large Format Digital Sign (LFDS) at 626 Stirling Highway, Mosman Park. The LFDS is proposed to be installed on the façade of an existing building, viewable from Stirling Highway northbound. The LFDS will replace an existing static advertising and business sign currently attached to the same façade. The LFDS is located outside, but visible from, a state-controlled road (Stirling Highway), and is therefore subject to Sections 3 and 5 of Main Roads’ Policy and Application Guidelines for Advertising Within and Beyond State Road Reserves (October 2020). Section 4 of the Policy does not apply to this proposal. The assessment has been undertaken by Raymond Rachmat (Road Safety Auditor) and Sam Laybutt (Senior Road Safety Auditor).
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 1 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
2 LFDS Location and Characteristics
2.1 LFDS Location The location of the proposed LFDS is shown in Figure 2-1. The LFDS will be installed on the façade of an existing commercial building located at 626 Stirling Highway and is visible from Stirling Highway northbound.
Figure 2-1 LFDS Location
Proposed LFDS
2.2 LFDS Characteristics The proposed LFDS has a screen dimension of 6m by 4m and approximately 2.1m to 2.7m above ground. Figure 2-2 below shows the artist’s impression of LFDS viewed from Stirling Highway. This complete site plan is included in Appendix A. The proposed LFDS is located within a commercial strip with other business and advertising signs already present, therefore the proposed LFDS would blend well with the existing roadside environment.
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 2 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Figure 2-2 Proposed LFDS – View from Stirling Highway Northbound
Proposed LFDS
Figure 2-3 LFDS Dimension
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 3 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
3 Road Environment and Traffic Volumes
Roads in the vicinity of the proposed LFDS are: > Stirling Highway is classified as a Primary Distributor under the Main Roads WA Functional Road Hierarchy with a posted speed limit of 60 km/h. The road is a single carriageway road with 2 northbound lanes and 2 southbound lanes and a painted median. > Glyde Street is classified as a Local Distributor under the Main Roads WA Functional Road Hierarchy with a posted speed limit of 50 km/h.
Table 3-1 Average Mid-Block Traffic Volume
Weekday AM Weekday PM Location Date Daily Peak Peak
Stirling Highway (H014) (northbound) 2019/2020 1,235 1,119 16,398 (North of Wellington Street SLK 10.78)
Stirling Highway (H014) (southbound) 2019/2020 797 1,325 15,317 (North of Wellington Street SLK 10.78)
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 4 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
4 LFDS Visibility and Driver Sight Lines
Figure 4-1 shows the LFDS from the point of view of driver on the left lane on Stirling Highway northbound. From the perspective of drivers travelling in the left lane, the LFDS would be partially visible from approximately 140m away with most of the LFDS obscured by vegetation. At 80m the LFDS can be fully visible, however it may be obscured by other vehicles in the adjacent lane. At the approach to Glyde Street intersection the LFDS may momentarily be in the background of the primary signals on the median, however the LFDS and the primary signals are located outside of the driver’s viewing corridor and at this point drivers would be focused the secondary and tertiary signals on the far side of the intersection. Figure 4-2 shows the LFDS from the point of view of driver on the right lane on Stirling Highway northbound. When travelling on the right lane, the LFDS is partially visible from 100m away and become fully visible at approximately 80m away. At the approach to Glyde Street intersection, the LFDS would be positioned under the signals and as such will not form the background of the signals. Although the LFDS will replace existing static advertising signage, in preliminary discussions Main Roads WA has expressed a concern that the there is a potential for the LFDS to distract drivers undertaking right turn into Glyde Street. Under the present filter turn signal phasing, drivers seeking to turn right must wait for an appropriate gap in the opposing traffic flow. A change in advertising message may increase the risk of a driver mis-judging a gap in the opposing traffic flow, increasing the risk of a crash occurring. In order to mitigate against this risk, certain modifications to the traffic signal operation are proposed in Section 5.3.
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 5 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Figure 4-1 Stirling Highway View Northbound – Left Lane
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 6 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Figure 4-2 Stirling Highway View Northbound – Right Lane
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 7 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
5 Device Restriction Area
5.1 Criteria A Device Restriction Area (DRA) is an area where advertising devices visible from state-controlled road are restricted under the Policy. One of the main reasons for establishing DRAs are to ensure that important information conveyed via traffic control devices (e.g. traffic signals, give way signs, stop signs etc.) is not obscured and to ensure sight lines for vehicle and pedestrian movements are not impeded. The location of DRAs are defined in Appendix A of the Policy. The Policy broadly categorise the DRAs into two categories: for freeway or freeway standard roads and non-freeway standard roads. The relevant DRAs for the proposed LFDS are for non-freeway standard roads and are shown below in Figure 5-1.
Figure 5-1 Relevant DRA for the Proposed LFDS
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 8 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
5.2 Cross Road DRA This DRA applies to the northeast corner of the Stirling Highway and Glyde Street. Figure 5-2 below shows the DRA applied to the intersection, which indicates that the LFDS is located within the DRA. Refer to Appendix B for larger version of the drawing. As per the Policy, advertising devices located within this type of DRA are supportable by Main Roads, subject to general road safety principles and risk mitigations assessed on a case by case basis. Relevant road safety factors that support an advertising device at the subject location include: > The proposed LFDS replaces an existing advertising device that has been located in the same position for many years, with no record of casualty crashes at the adjacent intersection, or in the immediate vicinity of the device (refer to Section 6); > The proposed LFDS is located along a section of Stirling Highway which has frequent advertising devices, both free-standing and mounted to building facades. Therefore, the proposed LFDS is consistent with the existing visual environment and unlikely to be unusually prominent; > The subject section of Stirling Highway is a low speed (60km/h) environment with associated lower road safety risk; > The proposed LFDS will be located in a position that does not conflict with driver sight lines to traffic signals or traffic signs, and does not form a backdrop to the relevant traffic signal lanterns; > The LFDS is proposed to be turned off at night time (e.g. 10pm to 6am) meaning it will not be visible to drivers during this period; > Luminance, dwell time and advertising content will be controlled in accordance with the requirements of the Policy to minimise risk. One relevant road safety factor is the existing filter right turn from Stirling Highway into Glyde Street. A LFDS was approved by Main Roads and is now operating at the corner of Stirling Highway/Bay View Terrace in Claremont, which is a very similar site. The Claremont location has a filter right turn for most of the day but right turns are prohibited during certain peak periods. At other locations recently supported by Main Roads on Canning Highway, Great Eastern Highway and Orrong Road, right turns have generally been controlled by arrows with no filter turns permitted from the major road. Right turn pockets are also provided at these other locations, which reduces the friction between through and turning traffic and reduces the potential for crashes associated with lane changes to pass a vehicle waiting to turn right. At the subject site, there are no recorded casualty crashes on the approach to the Stirling Highway/Glyde Street intersection (refer to Section 6), indicating that the existing static advertising device is not resulting in a crash problem. A review of non-KSI (i.e. property damage only) crashes at the Stirling Highway/Glyde Street intersection was also undertaken, revealing a total of 8 reported crashes, most of which are rear-end type crashes. Of the 8 recorded crashes, only 2 were casualty crashes (medical treatment), the remaining being property damage only. This crash history is not unexpected given the signalised intersection without a right turn pocket, and with only a filter right turn. Although the existing crash history at the site does not indicate a crash problem caused or contributed to by the presence of an advertising device, it is acknowledged that digital advertising signs have the potential to capture the attention of a greater proportion of drivers than static advertising signs. With this, there may be a greater potential for distraction to occur and result in a crash. Therefore, modifications to the traffic signal operations are proposed to reduce minimise this risk, as set out in Section 5.3. The proposed modifications are also anticipated to improve road safety, regardless of whether the proposed LFDS is installed.
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 9 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Figure 5-2 Proposed LFDS Location Relative to the Cross – Road DRA
5.3 Mitigation Measure To mitigate the potential risks associated with the proposed LFDS and the existing filter right turn, and absence of right turn pocket, several options were investigated, including: 1. Construction of a right turn pocket to separate right turn traffic from through traffic. This option is not feasible due to the constrained road reserve and built-up land adjacent to it; 2. Removal of right-turn filter and replacement with arrow-controlled right-turn phase; and 3. Prohibition of the right turn movement from Stirling Highway into Glyde Street. Analysis of intersection performance using Linsig software identified that Option 2 could be implemented with no worsening of delay or level of service. Therefore, this option is recommended for implementation as a condition of approval for the proposed LFDS. If implemented, the arrow-controlled right turn would remove the risk of right-angle crashes occurring and reduce the frequency of rear-end crashes by creating more predictable vehicle movements and simpler decisions for drivers using the intersection. For more information regarding the traffic analysis, please refer to the separate Traffic Signal Approval Policy Stage 2 Report.
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 10 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
6 Crash History
The Policy requires an evaluation of the crash history of the location of proposed advertising signs to determine whether a LFDS is permitted at the nominated site.
6.1 Killed and Serious Injury (KSI) Criteria Main Roads’ Policy (Clause 3.1.3.1) states that a billboard sign is subject to amendment when the proposed site has a history of three (3) or more KSI crashes at any intersection within ‘d’ metres of the approach to the proposed advertisement sign. For roads with 60km/h speed limit the distance ‘d’ is 65m and the only intersection within this distance is Stirling Highway and Glyde Street intersection. The latest 5-year crash data (2015-2019) for the intersection shows that there are no KSI crashes at this intersection, therefore the LFDS satisfy this requirement.
6.2 Crash Rate Criteria Section 3.1.3.2 of the Policy states that “A billboard sign is not permitted where sections of the road on a carriageway have a crash rate higher than the critical crash rate.” To determine the crash rate of the road section, the casualty crash (fatal, hospital, medical) rate will be calculated. Only crashes within the midblock of the road section will be considered and intersection crashes will not be included, in accordance with Appendix C of the Policy. The following road sections where the LFDS is visible will be analysed: > Stirling Highway SLK 11.74 – SLK 12.74 (1km before the LFDS) > Stirling Highway SLK 11.24 – SLK 11.74 (500m after the LFDS)
6.2.1 Stirling Highway Northbound The LFDS is located at Stirling Highway SLK 11.74. The crash rate calculation was conducted on rolling 1 km segments from SLK 12.74 to SLK 11.24. Table 6-1 below presents the summary of the results of the crash rate calculation and a comparison with the critical crash rates for this type of road and speed limit. Figure 6-1 shows the comparison graphically. A more detailed calculation is provided in Appendix E.
Table 6-1 Stirling Highway Northbound Casualty Crash Rate
Risk Score No. of Casualty Casualty Crash Rate Critical Crash Section (in 10^4 Crash Category Crashes (in 10^4 ERU per 10^8 VKT) Rate ERU)
1 5 151 260.89 LOW 2 6 174 300.62 HIGH 3 8 190 328.27 HIGH 265.7 4 16 363 627.16 HIGH 5 16 311 537.32 HIGH 6 15 251 433.66 HIGH
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 11 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Figure 6-1 Comparison of Critical Crash Rate and Stirling Highway Casualty Crash Rate
As the results show, the casualty crash rate for 5 sections are above the threshold and therefore is not compliant with the Policy.
6.2.2 Interrogation of Crash Patterns Despite the appearance of a road section with a significant crash problem, a deeper interrogation of the crash data shows that the proposed advertising device is actually located within a fairly low-risk road section. As shown in Figure 6-2 there are two significant crash clusters which significantly influence the Casualty Crash Rate of the subject road section: > A cluster of 5 casualty crashes in the vicinity of Victoria Street train station and level crossing, located approximately 550m to 650m south of the proposed LFDS. The crashes in this cluster include two right- angle crashes involving vehicles leaving the service station driveways, a ‘hit object’ crash and one ‘hit pedestrian’ crash. It must be noted that this cluster is over 400m from the first point where a northbound driver would have any visibility of the proposed LFDS. > A cluster of 10 casualty crashes approximately 250m to 450m north of the proposed LFDS, to the north of Salvado Street. This section of Stirling Highway has a large number of commercial crossovers with unrestricted turning movements, which is likely to be the main contributing factor to the cluster of crashes. At a posted speed of 60km/h, a driver passing the proposed LFDS would travel for 15 seconds before reaching this cluster of crashes. In comparison, the section of Stirling Highway 500m before the proposed LFDS and 250m after the proposed LFDS only has a total of 4 recorded midblock casualty crashes, 3 of which are located north of the Glyde Street intersection. These 4 casualty crashes would be insufficient to generate a non-compliant Casualty Crash Rate, even accounting for a shorter section of road. This deeper interrogation of the crash data indicates that the proposed LFDS is actually located on a relatively low risk section of Stirling Highway, and that the recorded crashes within the rolling 1km sections are actually entirely unrelated to the proposed LFDS location. Installation of the proposed LFDS can be expected to have no material effect on the casualty crash rate of the subject section of Stirling Highway, as the LFDS cannot be seen by drivers in the vicinity of either crash cluster. In fact, not a single midblock casualty crash was recorded on the section of Stirling Highway from where the proposed LFDS will likely be visible (approx SLK 11.94 to 11.74). The nearest recorded casualty crash is located approximately 70m past the sign – approximately 4.2 seconds’ travel time at 60km/h. Given the above, the Road Safety Assessment Team is of the view that the non-compliant casualty crash rate is not indicative of the actual low level of road safety risk associated with the proposed LFDS, and is not sufficient justification for rejection of the proposed LFDS. In the Team’s view, the subject LFDS is located in a relatively low risk section of Stirling Highway as supported by the recorded crash data.
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 12 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Figure 6-2 Crash clusters identified near the LFDS
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 13 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
7 Assessment Against Main Roads Policy
Main Roads’ Policy, Clause 5.3 provides the general road user safety conditions under which advertising signs visible from state-controlled roads are assessed. The conditions are outline and addressed below.
Category Policy Description Assessment
The design, form, orientation and physical size of the LFDS is typical of a digital advertising sign and are not Advertising displays that have the potential to unduly expected to distract drivers. distract drivers due to their design form, orientation Iridescence, lustre or brilliance of reflected light will be Display or physical size, or iridescence, lustre or brilliance of managed by illumination settings on the LFDS that react reflected light, shall not be permitted. Assessment to the level of ambient light in order to reduction the shall be undertaken subjectively. potential for any distraction to a driver. The maximum luminance values and the method of varying luminance will be in accordance with the Appendix B of the Policy. The brightness and light emission of the proposed LFDS Advertising signs likely to dazzle or distract drivers will be managed according to the level of ambient light in due to their brightness, high light emissions and/or order to reduce the potential for any distraction to a frequent flashing, shall not be permitted. Sign driver. The maximum luminance values and the method owners may be directed to arrange for an of varying luminance will be in accordance with the independent post-installation assessment to Display Appendix B of the Policy. determine whether the maximum luminance of illuminated and electronic advertising devices shown The proposed LFDS will not include flashing messages – at Appendix B are exceeded, in which case the sign the advertising messages will have a transition time not owner may be required to subsequently remove or exceeding 0.1 seconds between alternate messages. modify the sign display This transition will be used to change the luminance levels as the level of ambient light changes.
Advertising displays that could create a confusing or dominating background, which have the potential to The proposed LFDS will not have confusing and Display reduce the clarity of a traffic control device or the dominating background and is not within driver’s sight readability of the road layout, shall not be permitted. lines to any traffic signs and devices. Assessment shall be undertaken subjectively
For digital format billboards, the duration of transition between the full display of one message and the full Display Transition time will be set to not exceed 0.1 seconds display of the next message shall not exceed 0.1 seconds
Animated transitional effects such as fly-in, sliding The proposed LFDS will not include animated Display and checker boarding shall not be permitted on transitional effects such as fly-in, sliding or checker electronic signs boarding.
The primary textual elements of advertisements intended to be read by passing motorists shall be legible for drivers travelling at the normal road operating speed and when viewed within a ten- degree horizontal field of vision. No more than Advertisements to be displayed on the proposed LFDS seven words on any single sign display shall be will be designed to meet this condition and in Display readable by such drivers at any one time. Any accordance with the approval condition of the existing additional legend displayed on the sign shall have a LFDS letter height that renders the wording decisively illegible to passing motorists, i.e. any additional legend shall be legible only for non-motorised road users such as cyclists, passers-by on foot, etc.”
Message dwell time should be as per the requirements of Table 4.2 of the Policy – i.e. 40 The dwell time for messages on the LFDS will be Display seconds for a 60km/h, the speed limit of Stirling compliant with this policy. Highway.
Advertising devices shall not be located within Device Restriction Areas as depicted in Figure 1 of The LFDS is located within DRA of the Stirling Highway Appendix A for state roads other than Freeways and and Glyde Street intersection. The proposed mitigation Freeway standard roads or Figure 2 of Appendix A measure of modifying the traffic signal operation to Location for Freeways or Freeway standard roads. For certain remove the right-turn filter movement will result in an Device Restriction Areas this is subject to relevant improvement to road safety and supports the approval of road safety factors and site-specific mitigation the proposed LFDS. measures.
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 14 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Category Policy Description Assessment
Advertising devices shall not be located within two (2) kilometres of an information bay located on the The LFDS is not located within two (2) kilometres of an Location same route, which provides for the display of information bay on the same route. business advertising.
Advertising devices shall not be positioned within The LFDS is proposed to be installed on the façade of Location driver sightline areas. an existing building, outside of the driver sight line areas.
The content of advertising devices shall exclude the following: § Colours and shapes arranged that may be mistaken for a traffic signals, traffic signs or instruction signs. Advertisements to be displayed on the proposed LFDS Content § Symbols, graphics or text that entices drivers to will be designed to meet this condition. immediately turn or change lanes, or which could be mistaken for an instruction to drivers. § Complicated / long website, social media or email addresses, and text messaging instructions.
§ Moving advertising devices shall be restricted to speed environments of 70 km/h or less. § Movement of an advertising device shall be Movement and restricted to rotation about a vertical axis or axes The proposed LFDS will be stationary and not involve Rotation (Advertising devices in the form of a flag or movement or rotation. banner are excluded from this condition). § Variable message sign advertising shall not be displayed on a moving advertising device. Advertising signs shall be excluded from road The proposed LFDS is located within an existing Road User sections offering significant visual aesthetic value for commercial strip, therefore it blends with the existing Amenity motorists where the display of devices will detract roadside environment and will not detract from the from such visual amenity for motorists. existing visual amenity of the surrounding area.
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 15 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
8 Conclusion and Recommendation
A large format digital sign (LFDS) is proposed to be installed on the facade of an existing building located on at 626 Stirling Highway, Mosman Park. The LFDS is located outside, but visible from, a state-controlled road reserve (Stirling Highway). The proposed LFDS has been assessed against the Main Roads Policy and Application Guidelines for Advertising Signs Within and Beyond State Road Reserves (October 2020), with the following conclusions:
LFDS Characteristics > Screen dimension: 6m by 4m > The LFDS will be mounted on the façade of an existing building 2.1m to 2.7m above ground, away from driver’s sight line area. > The LFDS will be mounted on the southern face of the building, and will visible to northbound traffic on Stirling Highway. > The proposed sign will comply with all message display requirements, including luminosity, transitions and colours;
Device Restriction Areas > An assessment has been undertaken against all relevant Device Restriction Areas listed in Appendix A of the Policy. > The LFDS is located within the ‘Cross Road DRA’ of Stirling Highway / Glyde Street intersection. > Consideration of relevant road safety factors supports the installation of a LFDS at this location, with the exception of the existing filter right turn movement from Stirling Highway into Glyde Street. > In order to mitigate the risk associated with this movement, modifications to the traffic signal operations are recommended to remove the right turn filter and replace it with a fully arrow-controlled right turn. These modifications will remove the risk associated with drivers selecting appropriate right turn gaps, and result in more predictable traffic movements for all users of the intersection.
Crash History > The LFDS meets the KSI crash history requirement as there are no KSI crashes recorded at Stirling Highway / Glyde Street intersection in the last 5 years. > The Casualty Crash Rate for Stirling Highway is non-compliant with calculated in accordance with the requirements of the Policy. > A deeper interrogation of the crash data clearly indicates that the non-compliant crash rate is influenced heavily by two clusters of casualty crashes that are located >550m before the LFDS and >250m after the LFDS. These clusters are located in areas where the proposed LFDS cannot be seen, and beyond the distance any potential residual cognitive load. In fact, there were no recorded midblock casualty crashes in the section of Stirling Highway where the LFDS will be seen. > The Road Safety Assessment Team is of the view that the non-compliant casualty crash rate is not indicative of the actual low level of road safety risk associated with the proposed LFDS, and is not sufficient justification for rejection of the proposed LFDS. In the Team’s view, the subject LFDS is located in a relatively low risk section of Stirling Highway as supported by the recorded crash data. In summary, the proposed LFDS is considered to be low risk from a road safety perspective, subject to the recommended mitigation measures being implemented. On this basis, it is recommended that the subject LFDS be approved.
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 16 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
APPENDIX
LFDS PLAN
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 17 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY, MOSMAN PARK - DA 19/01/2021 HISTORICAL REFERENCE
626 STIRLING HIGHWAY, MOSMAN PARK - DA 19/01/2021 CONCEPTUAL EXPLORATION
There are minimal references of architectural character to commercial buildings beyond that of the Mosman Park Hotel (converted), the Stirling Highway strip and the Camelot Cinema (pictured). It is void of consistency, however, there is consistency in how Glyde Street is shaping in the aesthetics of recently approved projects and how they have treated the design principles of Design WA.
Aspect of Art Deco and Post-Modernism have been repeated in the immediate context and are referenced also in the under construction streetscape. Good opportunity for art-deco revivalist themes to be incorporated.
626 STIRLING HIGHWAY, MOSMAN PARK - DA 19/01/2021
S
14.26
14.49
14.15
14.42 14.65 W
14.53
14.24
Concrete Brick Paved Brick
14.83 13.95
14.04
14.71
14.92
14.97 Bollard 14.82
Barrier Kerb Barrier
14.5 14.99 15.01 TR
E 15.02
14.06
15.0
13.97 Bollard 15.06
Concrete 14.51
GLYDE STREET GLYDE 14.94 14.35
- average condition average -
High Colorbond Fence Colorbond High 15.17 14.0 4.5
13.48 13.65
15.18 16.42(top/fence)
133°59'28"
13.44 147°18'10" 15.20
1.75 15.24
N TR
Brick Paved Brick
15.20
135°39'42"
Gully
Drainage Brick Paved Brick
14.01 13.92
15.20 Brick Paved Brick
Sewer AC Sewer
13.49
13.14 HIGHWAY STIRLING
15.33 13.45 13.45
13.24
13.96 Barrier Kerb Barrier
15.96(top/fence)
13.5
in Hatch in
Water Meter Water
15.51
13.39
12.87
15.43
13.95
Meterbox's
15.44
FFL 13.38
13.95
13.09 13.09
12.94
Barrier Kerb Barrier
13.92(TRW) 15.45
13.50 Brick Paved Brick
13.95
13.99
Brick Paved Brick 13.48
Ramp 13.94
15.5
36.08 15.52 18.47
Invert: 9.11 Invert:
13.90
15.37 15.50
Depth: 3m Depth:
15.52
Up: 0.9 Up: 12.73 12.73
12.49
15.63 Steps
TR
Sewer Junction Sewer 15.45
12.58 FFL 13.31 14.06
#626 Brick Building Brick
Steps
13.36 Storey Double
15.34(TP)
12.95 151 LOT
Invert: 9.12 Invert:
Depth: 2.7m Depth: 15.37 12.59 13.96 Up: 0.9 Up:
& Wrought-Iron Fencing
Sewer Junction Sewer Brick Retainer w/pillars
14.03 Sewer Line Sewer
13.0
Unidentified
Brick Paved Pit
Est. from Network GPS Network from Est.
15.66 12.21 15.65 X/O Brick Paved Brick Brick Paved Brick
14.06(TRW)
12.29
RL 12.03 AHD 12.03 RL Kerb Barrier
TBM Nail & Plate & Nail TBM
15.74
- good condition good - 15.72
12.03
12.5
FFL
Brick Paved Brick 15.40
High Pinelap Fence Pinelap High
14.10 FFL
12.16
Steps
Brick Paved Brick
12.24 12.24
15.33(TP)
13.28 12.37
Brick Paved Brick
Cable
12.97
14.06
15.77
15.68
12.03
33°4' 12.69 13.29 Earth Gate
12.11 35.97 15.80
90°
14.11 Brick Retainer Brick 13.06 12.33 12.68
Brick Retainer Brick
12.18
13.87(TRW)
12.26
13.04(TRW)
14.52(TRW)
14.78
15.84 14.10
13.68 in Hatch in
13.32
13.05
14.65 14.30 13.03 Water Meter Water
by Vegetation by
12.17 view from obstructed -
12.17 17.24(top/gutter) Abutting Building Abutting
15.88
12.40
Sewer AC Sewer Bay Parking
Parking Bay Parking
Parking Bay Parking
Parking Bay Parking Parking Bay Parking
15.93
#620 Brick Building Brick
FFL
21.36(ridge/ht.)
11.77
Single Storey Single
15.94 15.95 LOT 11 LOT 15.96
15.89 16.00
1:150 @ A3 STIRLING HIGHWAY 2048 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY
. The copyright of these drawings and all parts thereof remain the property of Proekt Architecture. SITE SURVEY - UNDERTAKEN BY VISION SURVEYS CONSULTING ON 30/10/2020 SK01
14.26
14.49 14.15
14.42 14.65
14.53
14.24
Concrete
Brick Paved Brick
14.83 13.95
14.04
14.71
14.92
14.97 Bollard 14.82
Barrier Kerb Barrier 14.5 14.99 15.01 TR
15.02
14.06 15.0
13.97 Bollard 15.06
Concrete
14.51
14.94
14.35
15.17
4.5 14.0
13.48 13.65
15.18
16.42(top/fence)
133°59'28"
13.44 147°18'10" 15.20
1.75 15.24
TR
Brick Paved Brick 15.20
135°39'42"
Gully
Drainage
High ColorbondPaved Brick Fence 14.01 13.92
- average condition 15.20 Brick Paved Brick
Sewer AC Sewer
13.49
13.14 HIGHWAY STIRLING
15.33
13.45 13.45
13.24
13.96 Barrier Kerb Barrier
15.96(top/fence)
13.5
15.51
15.43
13.95 12.87
15.44 Water Meter FFL
in Hatch13.39 13.95
13.09 13.09
12.94
Barrier Kerb Barrier 13.38 Meterbox's 13.92(TRW)
15.45
Brick Paved 13.99
Brick Paved Brick
13.48 GLYDE STREET Ramp
15.5
36.08 15.52 18.47
13.90
15.37 15.50
15.52
15.63
TR
Steps 15.45
Sewer Junction FFL
Up: 0.9 14.06 12.49 12.73 Steps
EXISTING 13.36 Depth: 3m 15.34(TP)
12.95 SOAKWELL Invert: 9.11 LOT 151
12.58 15.37 12.59
13.96 Double Storey
& Wrought-Iron Fencing
Brick Retainer w/pillars
EXISTING 14.03 Brick Building
Sewer Line Sewer Sewer Junction
EXISTING VEHICLE SOAKWELL
ACCESS POINTS Up: 0.9 13.0 #626
Brick Paved
Depth: 2.7m 15.66 15.65
X/O Brick Paved Brick Invert: 9.12
14.06(TRW) Unidentified
Pit Kerb Barrier
12.21
12.29 15.74
Brick Paved 15.72
12.5
TBM Nail & Plate 15.40 FFL
14.10 FFL
Steps RL 12.03 AHD EXISTING Paved Brick
12.24 12.03 12.24 SOAKWELL Est. from Network GPS
15.33(TP)
12.16 13.28 12.37
Brick Paved Brick
Brick Paved 12.97
14.06 15.77 High Pinelap Fence 15.68
12.03 33°4' 13.29 12.69
35.97 Earth
15.80
12.11 - good condition
90°
Cable 14.11
13.06 Brick Retainer Brick 12.33
12.68 Gate
12.18
13.87(TRW)
12.26 13.04(TRW)
14.52(TRW) Brick14.78 Retainer
15.84
14.10 in Hatch in
13.68 13.32
13.05 14.65 14.30 Water Meter Water 13.03
12.17
17.24(top/gutter) Abutting Building
12.17
15.88
#620 Brick Building Brick
12.40 - obstructed from view
Sewer AC Sewer Bay Parking Parking Bay Parking
Parking Bay Parking 21.36(ridge/ht.)
Parking Bay Parking
Parking Bay Parking
15.93
by Vegetation Storey Single
FFL
11.77 15.94 LOT 11 15.95
15.89 16.00
STORMWATER CALCULATIONS -
EXISTING ROOF AREA = 204.0m² PROPOSED ROOF AREA = 42.3 m² UNCOVERED DRIVEWAY AREA = 32.5 m² UNCOVERED GROUND FLOOR TERRACE AREA = 110.6 m² MEZZANINE AREA = 18.4 m² PROPOSED BUILDING AND STRUCTURE TOTAL AREA = 407.8 m² SITE PLAN EXISTING BUILDING AND STRUCTURE TO BE RETAINED CAPACITY REQUIRED (AREA x 0.0125) = 5.0975 m³ SCALE 1:150 @ A3 EXISTING CAR PARKING AREAS EXISTING SOAKWELL (1.2m x 1.5m) = 1.7 m³ DEMOLITION SHOWN IN RED NUMBER OF SOAKWELL PROVIDED = 3 EXISTING VEHICLE DRIVEWAYS / ACCESS POINTS CAPACITY PROVIDED = 5.1 m³ 0 5m
1:150 @ A3 STIRLING HIGHWAY 2048 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY
. The copyright of these drawings and all parts thereof remain the property of Proekt Architecture. DA - 19/01/21 SK02 EXISTING BUILDING
5090 4600 1400 EXISTING BUILDING
1650 14.00 1400 4265
TIMBER LOOK SCREENING ENTRY RL14.000
PROPOSED EXTENSION 13.96 13.5 9385 UP
TIMBER LOOK SCREENING
13.38 13.95 13.95
13.99 13.0 BIN STORE 13.90 TIMBER LOOK SCREENINGRL13.480 EXISTING VEHICLE 12.48m2 13.95 18300
DRIVEWAYS AND15385 PARKING 4 12.95 VISITOR 2.4x5.4 12.59 EXISTING BUILDING 13.96
EXISTING VEHICLE 3 ACCESS POINTS VISITOR 14.06 12.5 EXISTING VEHICLE 2.4x5.4 DRIVEWAYS PARKING CARPARK AND BIN ROOM 1 2
STAFF STAFF MINIMUM 2.1m CLEAR HEIGHT IN 2.4x5.4 2.4x5.4 14.06 13.28 12.97 RL13.290 12.69 UP GATE
11855 9400 1500 4350 8750
PROPOSED EXTENSION EXISTING VEHICLE EXISTING BUILDING DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING
LOWER GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1:150 @ A3 EXISTING BUILDING TO BE RETAINED DEMOLITION SHOWN IN RED LOW HEIGHT SPACE UNDERNEATH NEW DECKING 0 5m
1:150 @ A3 STIRLING HIGHWAY 2048 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY
. The copyright of these drawings and all parts thereof remain the property of Proekt Architecture. DA - 19/01/21 SK03 EXISTING BUILDING
14.42
14.04 14.50 5090 14.97 15.00 EXISTING BUILDING 15.02 14.06 14.51 14.94 1650 14.35
15.17 1400 4265 14.00 15.20 15.24
PLANTER
15.33
PROPOSED EXTENSION 12910 EXISTING STAFF ROOM EXISTING FIXED CONVERTED FOR ENTRY 15.44 15.43 ACCESSIBILITY DN RL15.510 RL15.740 TRELLIS RL15.510 SCREEN SLIDE
VOID RL15.510 PLANTER 1:14 3560 RAMP 18300 EXISTING EXISTING KITCHEN KITCHEN RL15.510 RL15.510 EXISTING BUILDING
RL15.740
OUTDOOR TERRACE 15.66 RL15.740 164.85m2 EXISITNG EXISTING COMMON TENANCY UP RL15.740 RL15.740 UP
TIMBER LOOK TIMBER LOOK SCREENING SCREENING FEMALE / MALE ACCESSIBLE 6.63m2 5.38m2 DN 15.80 RL15.740 PLANTER
NEW ACCESS POINT TO HIDDEN CARPARK AND BINS
3560 4970 4430 1500 4350 8750
PROPOSED EXTENSION EXISTING BUILDING
GROUND FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1:150 @ A3 EXISTING BUILDING TO BE RETAINED DEMOLITION SHOWN IN RED
0 5m
1:150 @ A3 STIRLING HIGHWAY 2048 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY
. The copyright of these drawings and all parts thereof remain the property of Proekt Architecture. DA - 19/01/21 SK04 REFURBISHED AWNING EXISTING BUILDING
4600 1400 3070
5090 EXISTING BUILDING
SCREEN
FALL 1400
6365
1800
PROPOSED EXTENSION ROOM 4 COMMON
10450 FALL
TOP OF SCREEN WALLAC RL 20.520 AC BOX
AC AC
AC PLANT SCREENED FROM STREET FALL VOID 1735
BATH BOX
KITCHEN ROOM 3 18300 TOP OF SCREEN WALL RL 20.520 COMMON
VOID TO TERRACE BELOW REFURBISHED AWNING
FALL BOX FALL
MEZZANINE 3005 DN RL19.390 2 18.40m COMMON DN ROOM 1 ROOM 2 TO AC PLANT ACCESS WINDOW TIMBER LOOK
SCREENING FIXED LOUVRES
FALL 1295
ZERO LOT GUTTER EXISTING DEPTH
1735 4140 5430 4350 8750 3070
REFURBISHED PROPOSED EXTENSION AWNING EXISTING BUILDING
MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN SCALE 1:150 @ A3 EXISTING BUILDING TO BE RETAINED EXISTING SHORT STAY LAYOUT SHOWN 0 5m
1:150 @ A3 STIRLING HIGHWAY 2048 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY
. The copyright of these drawings and all parts thereof remain the property of Proekt Architecture. DA - 19/01/21 SK05 TOP OF WALL RL 24.947 FALL
FALL STIRLING HIGHWAY STIRLING EAVE GUTTER
GLYDE STREET TOP OF WALL RL 24.067
FALL
FALL
TOP OF SCREEN WALL RL 20.520 EAVE GUTTER
FALL
TOP OF WALL RL 23.640 BOX TOP OF WALL RL 24.947 TOP OF SCREEN WALL
ROOF AND OVERSHOW PLAN RL 20.520 SCALE 1:150 @ A3 VOID TO TERRACE BELOW FALL FALL FALL
0 5m EAVE GUTTER
OVERSHADOWING - 21 JUNE 12:00
EXISTING BUILDING TO BE RETAINED FIXED LOUVRES TOP OF WALL RL 23.760
TOP OF TIMBER LOOK FALL SCREENING RL 20.390 FALL 1295 GUTTER EAVE
NOT TO SCALE STIRLING HIGHWAY 2048 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY
. The copyright of these drawings and all parts thereof remain the property of Proekt Architecture. DA - 19/01/21 SK06 BOUNDARY BOUNDARY
R.L. 25.172
NEW MAKE GOOD AND PAINT NEW ARTIST VENETIAN STYLE COMMISSIONED PAINTING TEXTURE RENDER
NEW MAKE GOOD AND PAINT 5782
REFURBISHED AWNING TO MATCH SEMI FRAMELESS GLASS BALUSTRADE EXISTING DEPTH VENETIAN STYLE SCREEN TEXTURE RENDER MEZZAINE FLOOR R.L. 19.390 EXTERNAL STEEL WITH PAINT FINISH REPAIR EXISTING TIMBER LOOK WINDOW SCREENING REPAIR EXISTING DOOR SUITES 3650
VENETIAN STYLE VENETIAN STYLE GROUND FLOOR TEXTURE RENDER TEXTURE RENDER R.L. 15.740 EXTERNAL STEEL WITH PAINT FINISH 2100
2690 TIMBER LOOK SCREENING TIMBER LOOK SCREENING 2450
LOWER GROIND FLOOR R.L. 13.290 VENETIAN STYLE TRELLIS SCREEN FOR DISCREET HIDDEN DOOR RENDER + PAINT TEXTURE RENDER LANDSCAPE TRAINING TO BIN STORE
SOUTH - WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1:150 @ A3 BOUNDARY BOUNDARY
R.L. 25.172 5782
TIMBER LOOK NEW MAKE GOOD REFURBISHED AWNING SEMI FRAMELESS GLASS BALUSTRADE SCREENING AND PAINT TO MATCH EXISTING DEPTH
MEZZAINE FLOOR R.L. 19.390 EXTERNAL STEEL WITH PAINT FINISH TIMBER LOOK NEW MAKE GOOD SCREENING AND PAINT
3650 RENDER + PAINT
VENETIAN STYLE GROUND FLOOR TEXTURE RENDER R.L. 15.740 EXTERNAL STEEL WITH PAINT FINISH
RENDER + PAINT 2450
LOWER GROIND FLOOR R.L. 13.290 RENDER + PAINT
NORTH - EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1:150 @ A3
1:150 @ A3 STIRLING HIGHWAY 2048 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY
. The copyright of these drawings and all parts thereof remain the property of Proekt Architecture. DA - 19/01/21 SK07 BOUNDARY BOUNDARY
R.L. 25.172
NEW MAKE GOOD AND PAINT
VENETIAN STYLE TEXTURE RENDER
5782 NEW MAKE GOOD AND PAINT
REFURBISHED AWNING TO MATCH EXISTING REPAIR EXISTING REPAIR EXISTING REPAIR EXISTING REPAIR EXISTING DIMENSIONS WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW MEZZAINE FLOOR R.L. 19.390 EXTERNAL STEEL WITH PAINT FINISH
NEW MAKE GOOD AND PAINT 3650
VENETIAN STYLE GROUND FLOOR TEXTURE RENDER R.L. 15.740
MAKE GOOD AND MAKE GOOD AND REPAIR EXISTING REPAIR EXISTING
2450 WINDOW AND DOOR WINDOW AND DOOR LOWER GROIND FLOOR R.L. 13.290
NORTH - WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1:150 @ A3 BOUNDARY BOUNDARY
NEW ARTIST COMMISSIONED PAINTING R.L. 25.172
EXISTING ROOFING
REPAIR EXISTING REPAIR EXISTING REPAIR EXISTING REPAIR EXISTING WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW WINDOW
5782 NEW MAKE GOOD AND PAINT
REFURBISHED AWNING TO MATCH EXISTING DIMENSIONS LOW HEIGHT AC SCREEN WALL WITH SEMI FRAMELESS GLASS VENETIAN STYLE TEXTURE RENDER MEZZAINE FLOOR BALUSTRADE R.L. 19.390 EXTERNAL STEEL WITH PAINT FINISH TIMBER LOOK SCREENING NEW MAKE GOOD AND PAINT NEW MAKE GOOD AND PAINT 3650
VENETIAN STYLE VENETIAN STYLE GROUND FLOOR TEXTURE RENDER TEXTURE RENDER R.L. 15.740 EXTERNAL STEEL WITH PAINT FINISH TIMBER LOOK TIMBER LOOK SCREENING SCREENING 2450
LOWER GROIND FLOOR R.L. 13.290 TRELLIS SCREEN FOR DISCREET HIDDEN DOOR LANDSCAPE TRAINING TO BIN STORE
SOUTH - EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1:150 @ A3
1:150 @ A3 STIRLING HIGHWAY 2048 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY
. The copyright of these drawings and all parts thereof remain the property of Proekt Architecture. DA - 19/01/21 SK08 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY, MOSMAN PARK - DA 19/01/2021 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY, MOSMAN PARK - DA 19/01/2021 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY, MOSMAN PARK - DA 19/01/2021 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY, MOSMAN PARK - DA 19/01/2021 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY, MOSMAN PARK - DA 19/01/2021 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY, MOSMAN PARK - DA 19/01/2021 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY, MOSMAN PARK - DA 19/01/2021 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY, MOSMAN PARK - DA 19/01/2021 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
APPENDIX
DEVICE RESTRICTION AREA
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 19 626 STIRLING HIGHWAY STIRLING HIGHWAY / GLYDE STREET LFDS VISIBLE TO NORHTBOUND TRAFFIC CROSS ROAD DEVICE RESTRICTION AREA
PROPOSED LFDS
GLYDE STREET
STIRLING HIGHWAY
LEGEND PROPOSED LFDS CROSS ROAD DRA WITHIN ROAD RESERVE (DIAGRAM 2 OF FIGURE 1) CROSS ROAD DRA OUTSIDE ROAD OF RESERVE (DIAGRAM 2 OF FIGURE 1) Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
APPENDIX
CRASH DATA
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 21 Detailed Crash History
Report Criteria Road SLK CWY H014 - Stirling Hwy 11.24 to 12.74 All
Parameter Value Description From Date 01/01/2015 To Date 31/12/2019 Crash Type Midblock Severity Fatal Severity Hospital Severity Medical CWY Road Road Name SLK True Intersection Date Day Time Severity Crash Type Light Road Speed Traffic Road Road Speed MR Location RUM Unit Unit From To Veh/Ped First Second Third Target Dist No. Cond Cond Limit Control Feature Alignment Factor Nature Type Dir Dir Move Object Object Object Impact Hit Hit Hit Point H014 Stirling Hwy 11.33 S 11.06 21/12/ Wednesd 1033 Hospital 20163 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Driveway Curve Right On Cway 47:Manoeuv: Colliding Motor N S Straight 2016 ay 30315 Control Angle Leaving Cycle Ahead: Driveway Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.33 S 11.06 21/12/ Wednesd 1033 Hospital 20163 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Driveway Curve Right On Cway 47:Manoeuv: Target Car E N Turning: Side 2016 ay 30315 Control Angle Leaving To Make Driveway Right Turn H014 Stirling Hwy 11.34 S 11.07 01/02/ Monday 0955 Medical 20160 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Colliding Station S N Straight 2016 21770 Control Same Lane Wagon Ahead: Rear End Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.34 S 11.07 01/02/ Monday 0955 Medical 20160 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Target Car S N Straight Rear 2016 21770 Control Same Lane Ahead: Rear End Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.38 S 11.11 11/09/ Friday 1630 Medical 20152 Midblock Daylight 60 No Sign Or Driveway Sidewalk 40:Manoeuv: Colliding E Straight 2015 72833 Control Other Ahead: Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.38 S 11.11 11/09/ Friday 1630 Medical 20152 Midblock Daylight 60 No Sign Or Driveway Sidewalk 40:Manoeuv: Target Bicycle S N Straight Side 2015 72833 Control Other Ahead: Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.44 S 11.17 15/11/ Wednesd 1610 Hospital 20173 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Colliding Utility S N Straight 2017 ay 42430 Control Same Lane Ahead: Rear End Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.44 S 11.17 15/11/ Wednesd 1610 Hospital 20173 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Target Station S N Stopped: Rear 2017 ay 42430 Control Same Lane Wagon To Avoid Rear End Veh H014 Stirling Hwy 11.45 S 11.18 24/04/ Friday 1310 Hospital 20150 Midblock Daylight 60 No Sign Or Sideswip On Cway 37:Same Dirn: Colliding Car S N Overtakin 2015 51294 Control e Same Change Lanes g: Cut In Dirn - Left From Right H014 Stirling Hwy 11.45 S 11.18 24/04/ Friday 1310 Hospital 20150 Midblock Daylight 60 No Sign Or Sideswip On Cway 37:Same Dirn: Target Motor S N Straight Side 2015 51294 Control e Same Change Lanes Cycle Ahead: Dirn - Left Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.45 S 11.18 06/04/ Wednesd 1100 Hospital 20161 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Driveway Straight Hit Sidewalk 7:Pedest: In Colliding Car E S Straight 2016 ay 04893 Control Pedestria Driveway Ahead: n Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.45 S 11.18 06/04/ Wednesd 1100 Hospital 20161 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Driveway Straight Hit Sidewalk 7:Pedest: In Target Pedest S N Not On 2016 ay 04893 Control Pedestria Driveway rian Cway n (Walk / Run) H014 Stirling Hwy 11.46 S 11.19 03/07/ Friday 1100 Medical 20151 Midblock Daylight Wet 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Colliding Utility S N Straight 2015 55270 Control Same Lane Ahead: Rear End Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.46 S 11.19 03/07/ Friday 1100 Medical 20151 Midblock Daylight Wet 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Target Four S N Stopped: Rear 2015 55270 Control Same Lane Wheel To Avoid Rear End Drive Veh (Not Car Design )
Run on 21-Dec-2020 08:17 by RAYMOND RACHMAT Page 1 of 3 [email protected] Detailed Crash History CWY Road Road Name SLK True Intersection Date Day Time Severity Crash Type Light Road Speed Traffic Road Road Speed MR Location RUM Unit Unit From To Veh/Ped First Second Third Target Dist No. Cond Cond Limit Control Feature Alignment Factor Nature Type Dir Dir Move Object Object Object Impact Hit Hit Hit Point H014 Stirling Hwy 11.47 S 11.20 21/07/ Tuesday 0730 Medical 20151 Midblock Daylight Wet 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Colliding Car S N Straight 2015 74041 Control Same Lane Ahead: Rear End Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.47 S 11.20 21/07/ Tuesday 0730 Medical 20151 Midblock Daylight Wet 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Target Station S N Stopped: Rear 2015 74041 Control Same Lane Wagon To Avoid Rear End Veh H014 Stirling Hwy 11.49 S 11.22 06/04/ Wednesd 0958 Hospital 20160 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Driveway Straight Hit Sidewalk 7:Pedest: In Colliding Station E S Turning: 2016 ay 45264 Control Pedestria Driveway Wagon To Make n Left Turn H014 Stirling Hwy 11.49 S 11.22 06/04/ Wednesd 0958 Hospital 20160 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Driveway Straight Hit Sidewalk 7:Pedest: In Target Pedest S N Not On 2016 ay 45264 Control Pedestria Driveway rian Cway n (Walk / Run) H014 Stirling Hwy 11.49 S 11.22 17/09/ Saturday 0900 Medical 20162 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Colliding Four S N Straight 2016 73291 Control Same Lane Wheel Ahead: Rear End Drive Not Out (Not Of Control Car Design ) H014 Stirling Hwy 11.49 S 11.22 17/09/ Saturday 0900 Medical 20162 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Target Station S N Stopped: Rear 2016 73291 Control Same Lane Wagon To Avoid Rear End Veh H014 Stirling Hwy 11.50 S 11.23 27/09/ Sunday 1200 Medical 20152 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Colliding Utility N S Straight 2015 86811 Control Same Lane Ahead: Rear End Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.50 S 11.23 27/09/ Sunday 1200 Medical 20152 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Target Station N S Stopped: Rear 2015 86811 Control Same Lane Wagon To Avoid Rear End Veh H014 Stirling Hwy 11.58 S 11.31 15/04/ Friday 0850 Medical 20161 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Colliding Station S N Straight 2016 07634 Control Same Lane Wagon Ahead: Rear End Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.58 S 11.31 15/04/ Friday 0850 Medical 20161 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Target Station S N Stopped: Rear 2016 07634 Control Same Lane Wagon To Avoid Rear End Veh H014 Stirling Hwy 11.60 S 11.33 19/11/ Thursday 0835 Medical 20153 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Colliding Car N S Straight 2015 22216 Control Same Lane Ahead: Rear End Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.60 S 11.33 19/11/ Thursday 0835 Medical 20153 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Target Car N S Stopped: Rear 2015 22216 Control Same Lane To Avoid Rear End Veh H014 Stirling Hwy 11.68 S 11.41 11/04/ Thursday 1545 Medical 20190 Midblock Daylight Wet 60 No Sign Or Driveway Straight Right On Cway 47:Manoeuv: Colliding Station S N Straight 2019 98622 Control Angle Leaving Wagon Ahead: Driveway Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 11.68 S 11.41 11/04/ Thursday 1545 Medical 20190 Midblock Daylight Wet 60 No Sign Or Driveway Straight Right On Cway 47:Manoeuv: Target Station W S Turning: Side 2019 98622 Control Angle Leaving Wagon To Make Driveway Right Turn H014 Stirling Hwy 12.16 S 11.89 12/11/ Monday 0810 Medical 20183 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Colliding Four N S Straight 2018 06064 Control Same Lane Wheel Ahead: Rear End Drive Not Out (Not Of Control Car Design ) H014 Stirling Hwy 12.16 S 11.89 12/11/ Monday 0810 Medical 20183 Midblock Daylight Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Rear End On Cway 31:Same Dirn: Target Station N S Stopped: Rear 2018 06064 Control Same Lane Wagon To Avoid Rear End Veh H014 Stirling Hwy 12.31 S 12.04 17/06/ Friday 1710 Hospital 20161 Midblock Daylight 60 No Sign Or Driveway Straight Right On Cway 47:Manoeuv: Colliding Motor N S Straight 2016 52445 Control Angle Leaving Cycle Ahead: Driveway Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 12.31 S 12.04 17/06/ Friday 1710 Hospital 20161 Midblock Daylight 60 No Sign Or Driveway Straight Right On Cway 47:Manoeuv: Target Station E N Turning: Side 2016 52445 Control Angle Leaving Wagon To Make Driveway Right Turn H014 Stirling Hwy 12.33 S 12.06 29/03/ Thursday 1354 Medical 20180 Midblock Daylight 60 No Sign Or Straight Hit On Cway 3:Pedest: Far Colliding Car N S Straight 2018 15225 Control Pedestria Side Ahead: n Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 12.33 S 12.06 29/03/ Thursday 1354 Medical 20180 Midblock Daylight 60 No Sign Or Straight Hit On Cway 3:Pedest: Far Target Pedest W E Crossing 2018 15225 Control Pedestria Side rian Road Far n Side
Run on 21-Dec-2020 08:17 by RAYMOND RACHMAT Page 2 of 3 [email protected] Detailed Crash History CWY Road Road Name SLK True Intersection Date Day Time Severity Crash Type Light Road Speed Traffic Road Road Speed MR Location RUM Unit Unit From To Veh/Ped First Second Third Target Dist No. Cond Cond Limit Control Feature Alignment Factor Nature Type Dir Dir Move Object Object Object Impact Hit Hit Hit Point H014 Stirling Hwy 12.36 S 12.09 06/08/ Saturday 2022 Hospital 20162 Midblock Dark - Dry 60 No Sign Or Straight Hit On Left Verge 72:Off Path Colliding Station N S Out Of Building 2016 20905 Street Control Object After Leaving On Straight: Wagon Control: Lights On Cway Off Left Cway Reason Obj Unknown H014 Stirling Hwy 12.41 S 12.14 16/01/ Friday 1930 Medical 20150 Midblock Dark - Dry 60 No Sign Or Driveway Straight Right On Cway 47:Manoeuv: Colliding Motor N S Straight 2015 10775 Street Control Angle Leaving Cycle Ahead: Lights On Driveway Not Out Of Control H014 Stirling Hwy 12.41 S 12.14 16/01/ Friday 1930 Medical 20150 Midblock Dark - Dry 60 No Sign Or Driveway Straight Right On Cway 47:Manoeuv: Target Motor E S Turning: Rear 2015 10775 Street Control Angle Leaving Cycle To Make Lights On Driveway Left Turn
Run on 21-Dec-2020 08:17 by RAYMOND RACHMAT Page 3 of 3 [email protected] Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
APPENDIX
TRAFFIC DATA
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 23 SITE 5241
Hourly Volume 2019/20 Stirling Hwy (H014) Monday to Friday North of Wellington St (SLK 12.45)
All Vehicles Heavy Vehicles
NB SB Both NB SB Both %
00:00 51 52 103 5 3 8 7.8 01:00 26 29 55 1 0 1 1.8 02:00 18 18 36 4 1 5 13.9 03:00 21 22 43 3 1 4 9.3 04:00 70 41 111 11 2 13 11.7 05:00 287 184 471 18 12 30 6.4 06:00 856 444 1300 80 46 126 9.7 07:00 1635 853 2488 131 65 196 7.9 08:00 1568 958 2526 102 70 172 6.8 09:00 1251 984 2235 91 90 181 8.1 10:00 1103 940 2043 90 98 188 9.2 11:00 1083 982 2065 78 77 155 7.5 12:00 1073 1041 2114 72 92 164 7.8 13:00 1005 1008 2013 77 100 177 8.8 14:00 1049 1126 2175 78 73 151 6.9 15:00 1228 1323 2551 64 77 141 5.5 16:00 1183 1539 2722 52 60 112 4.1 17:00 1146 1543 2689 39 46 85 3.2 18:00 860 1083 1943 30 35 65 3.3 19:00 453 584 1037 14 20 34 3.3 20:00 353 461 814 11 17 28 3.4 21:00 282 375 657 7 12 19 2.9 22:00 206 289 495 6 12 18 3.6 23:00 131 162 293 2 3 5 1.7 TOTAL 16938 16041 32979 1066 1012 2078 6.3 Peak Statistics
AM TIME 07:15 08:30 07:30 07:00 10:00 07:00 VOL 1707 1048 2583 131 98 196 PM TIME 15:00 16:45 16:30 12:45 13:15 13:15 VOL 1228 1574 2799 84 102 181 SITE 5241
Hourly Volume 2019/20 Stirling Hwy (H014) Monday to Sunday North of Wellington St (SLK 12.45)
All Vehicles Heavy Vehicles
NB SB Both NB SB Both %
00:00 113 109 222 2 2 4 1.8 01:00 64 56 120 1 1 2 1.7 02:00 43 40 83 2 2 4 4.8 03:00 35 35 70 2 0 2 2.9 04:00 61 39 100 8 3 11 11.0 05:00 215 136 351 13 8 21 6.0 06:00 599 330 929 50 31 81 8.7 07:00 1125 625 1750 81 45 126 7.2 08:00 1235 797 2032 68 54 122 6.0 09:00 1169 953 2122 61 65 126 5.9 10:00 1149 997 2146 71 70 141 6.6 11:00 1213 1132 2345 67 59 126 5.4 12:00 1246 1156 2402 63 62 125 5.2 13:00 1158 1099 2257 61 69 130 5.8 14:00 1165 1151 2316 59 54 113 4.9 15:00 1229 1204 2433 56 57 113 4.6 16:00 1119 1325 2444 37 50 87 3.6 17:00 1084 1322 2406 36 35 71 3.0 18:00 820 945 1765 24 25 49 2.8 19:00 463 552 1015 10 15 25 2.5 20:00 380 433 813 11 13 24 3.0 21:00 300 383 683 7 11 18 2.6 22:00 238 291 529 5 11 16 3.0 23:00 175 207 382 2 4 6 1.6 TOTAL 16398 15317 31715 797 746 1543 4.9 Peak Statistics
AM TIME 11:30 11:45 11:30 07:00 10:00 10:00 VOL 1247 1165 2411 81 70 141 PM TIME 12:00 16:45 16:30 12:45 13:15 13:15 VOL 1246 1366 2512 67 71 132 SITE 5241
Hourly Volume 2019/20 Stirling Hwy (H014) Weekend North of Wellington St (SLK 12.45)
All Vehicles Heavy Vehicles
NB SB Both NB SB Both %
00:00 163 155 318 0 3 3 0.9 01:00 93 77 170 0 2 2 1.2 02:00 65 57 122 2 3 5 4.1 03:00 46 45 91 2 0 2 2.2 04:00 45 34 79 4 4 8 10.1 05:00 119 70 189 8 3 11 5.8 06:00 278 182 460 19 14 33 7.2 07:00 491 331 822 26 23 49 6.0 08:00 763 549 1312 31 36 67 5.1 09:00 953 819 1772 28 39 67 3.8 10:00 1063 947 2010 47 42 89 4.4 11:00 1203 1154 2357 52 37 89 3.8 12:00 1276 1142 2418 52 30 82 3.4 13:00 1175 1066 2241 39 33 72 3.2 14:00 1146 1042 2188 36 29 65 3.0 15:00 1086 955 2041 43 37 80 3.9 16:00 927 963 1890 21 37 58 3.1 17:00 896 950 1846 31 21 52 2.8 18:00 686 700 1386 18 14 32 2.3 19:00 423 455 878 10 8 18 2.1 20:00 361 358 719 10 10 20 2.8 21:00 282 350 632 6 11 17 2.7 22:00 242 262 504 4 11 15 3.0 23:00 199 226 425 3 4 7 1.6 TOTAL 13981 12889 26870 492 451 943 3.5 Peak Statistics
AM TIME 11:30 11:15 11:30 11:45 09:45 11:45 VOL 1281 1208 2481 55 44 91 PM TIME 12:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 15:30 12:00 VOL 1276 1142 2418 52 40 82 Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
APPENDIX
DETAILED CRASH CALCULATION
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 25 n= 5 years Two-way Crash Calculation L= 1 km Stirling Highway SLK 11.24 - 12.74 V= 31715 AADT Speed 60 km/h Low Speed Environment= START SLK 12.74 12.64 12.54 12.44 12.34 12.24 END SLK 11.74 11.64 11.54 11.44 11.34 11.24 Sections 1 2 3 4 5 6 AADT 31715 31715 31715 31715 31715 31715 Crash Risk Crash RUM Group RUM Codes 1000m 900m 800m 700m 600m 500m Vehicles No. of Risk Score Critical (<80km/h) Crash Risk Rate (in Crash ------Section Start SLK End SLK AADT Kilometres Casualty (in 10^4 Crash (>=80km/h) 10^4 ERU Category 0m 100m 200m 300m 400m 500m Travelled (VKT) Crashes ERU) Rate per 10^8 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 1 21 96 17, 18, 19 1 12.74 11.74 31,715 57,879,875 5 151 260.89 LOW 2 21, 51 98 319 2 12.64 11.64 31,715 57,879,875 6 174 300.62 HIGH 3 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 19 64 3 12.54 11.54 31,715 57,879,875 8 190 328.27 265.7 HIGH 4 31, 32, 33 8 21 1 1 3 8 9 9 4 12.44 11.44 31,715 57,879,875 16 363 627.16 HIGH 5 35, 36, 37, 54 13 31 1 1 1 5 12.34 11.34 31,715 57,879,875 16 311 537.32 HIGH 6 38, 39 11 67 6 12.24 11.24 31,715 57,879,875 15 251 433.66 HIGH 7 27, 34 12 183 8 42, 46, 47, 48 23 23 2 3 3 3 2 2 9 53, 55, 56 9 88 Crash Rate and Critical Crash Rate Comparison 700 10 43, 44, 61, 62, 63, 64 12 101 11 93 669 73 600 12 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 98 60 235 1 1 1 3 3 2 ) T K
13 65 0 0 V
8 500 14 69, 95 23 33 ^ 0 1
15 52, 71, 73, 76, 77 20 79 r e 16 72, 74, 94 37 95 1 1 1 1 p 400 U R
17 75 27 70 E 4
18 81, 83 17 101 ^ 0 300
1 Critical Crash Rate 19 82, 84 72 107 ( e t
20 85 23 62 a R 200 20, 30, 40, 45, 49, 50, 60, h s a
21 66, 67, 70, 80, 90, 91, 92, 0 0 1 1 r 94, 96, 97 C 100 Total Crashes 5 6 8 16 16 15 Total Crash Score 151 174 190 363 311 251 Casualty Crash Rate(R) (10^4 ERU per 10^8 VKT) 260.9 300.6 328.3 627.2 537.3 433.7 0 12.74 12.64 12.54 12.44 12.34 12.24 Threshold 265.7 Start SLK of 1km Rolling Sections Crash Category LOW HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH HIGH Road Safety Assessment Report Proposed Large Format Digital Sign – 626 Stirling Highway
About Cardno Cardno is a professional infrastructure and environmental services company, with expertise in the development and improvement of physical and social infrastructure for communities around the world. Cardno’s team includes leading professionals who plan, design, manage and deliver sustainable projects and community programs. Cardno is an international company listed on the Australian Securities Exchange [ASX:CDD].
Contact 11 Harvest Terrace West Perth WA 6005 Australia
Phone +61 8 9273 3888 Fax +61 8 9486 8664
Web Address www.cardno.com
CW1091500 | 27 January 2021 | Commercial in Confidence 26