The Monetary Reforms of the Romans and the Finds of Roman Denarii in Eastern and Northern Europe

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Monetary Reforms of the Romans and the Finds of Roman Denarii in Eastern and Northern Europe 135 The Monetary Reforms of the Romans and the Finds of Roman Denarii in Eastern and Northern Europe Lennart Lind Monetary measures undertaken inside the Roman Empire might be responsible for the composition of finds of Roman coins made ontside the Empire. A possible link between the composition of the denari«» finds in Barbarian Europe, on the one hand, and the monetary reforms of Nero (54—68) and Septimius Severus (193—2 I l ), on the other hand, has long been recogniaed. There is however a third Roman monetary reform which has put its imprint on the denorios finds in Central, Eastern and Northern Europe, the one of' Domitian (8 l —96). Lenntirt Littd, Deportment of Clossicol Arcltaeology and Ancient History, Stockholm University, S-106 9I Stockholm, Sweden. About 7,500 Roman dettarii, almost all from however, they cannot compete with later coins, the period 64-200, are known from finds in and they are usually found separately and Sweden (1990). The coins were unearthed form problems of their own (Lind forthcom- mainly on Gotland, which alone accounts for ing). c. 6,500 of the c. 7,500 denarii from Sweden. Most of the denarii found on Gotland are Only c. 1,000 denarii come from other parts of preserved and available for study; their ex- the country, i.e. Öland and the mainland (es- treme degree of wear is believed to prove that pecially Halland and Skåne). As lor the rest of the coins changed hands repeatedly in antiqui- Scandinavia, Denmark has c. 2,000 denarii ty. The denarii from the other parts of Swe- and Norway and Finland almost none (Lind den, as well as those from Denmark, are as a l'orthcoming). rule less worn than those from Gotland. The In Europe outside the limits of what was denarii from the rest of continental Europe, once the It&ti&eriut&t Romanum, Scandinavia outside the limes, are sometimes very worn, excepted, Roman denarii have been found in sometimes in a rather good state of preserva- the northern parts of the Netherlands, in Ger- tion. The dettarii known to have been found in many (FRG and the former GDR), Poland, Denmark are extant to a large degree; of the Czechoslovakia, the former Soviet Union and coins known to have been unearthed in other the "non-Roman" parts of Hungary and Ru- parts of the Continent, however, only a minor mania; Poland and the former Soviet Union part is available for study. enjoy the richest supplies. The Danish and the It has been known for a very long time that European continental material in its entirety monetary measures undertaken inside the show approximately the same composition as Roman Empire, for purely internal reasons, in that of Sweden, i.e. the decisive weight in some way might be responsible for the com- most countries rests on coins struck during the position of finds of Roman coins made outstde period 64—200, from the reign of Nero (54—68) the frontiers ol' the Empire. Already in 1860 to that of Septimius Severus (193—211). All Theodor Mommsen pointed to a possible link the considered countries have coins from the between the composition of the denari us finds period before the year 64. As for their number, in Europe outside the lit&res on the one hand, Current Su'edistt A retroeotogn Vol. I, l WS 136 Len»elrt Litlei and the monetary reform of Nero in the 60s on Gotland are distinguished by the fact that (which reduced the weight and the fineness of they are endowed with a preponderance of the silver coins) and the great debasement of clettelrii from the period of the three Antonine the denarius under Septimius Severus in the rulers (138—192) —Antoninus Pius, Marcus 190s (which diminished the intrinsic value of Aurelius and Commodus —and that the period a coin with one-third) on the other (Mommsen with the second largest store of coins is the 1860:771—774). The relevance of these find- one of Trajan and Hadrian (98—138), i.e. the ings of Mommsen for the material in Sweden, two preceding emperors. The dellelrii from the especially that on Gotland, was shown al- period of Nero to Nerva (54—98), and those ready in 1866 by Hans Hildebrand (1866:60f). from the period of Pertinax to Septimius Severus There is, however, a third Roman monetary (193—211),are almost always (cf. below) very reform which has put its imprint on the denar- few in number, but they are seldom totally ius finds in central, eastern and northern Eu- absent; the earlier group is commonly larger rope. I will come back to this presently. than the latter (cf. below). Most of the larger The written sources from antiquity do not finds on Gotland also contain one or a few have any information (at least not any we can specimens of so-called barbarian imitations. understand) answering the question of when Let us now examine the more important and from where the Roman deltarii found finds in some detail. On Gotland there are their way into the area of what today is Swe- eight hoard» exceeding 200 coins each, i.e. den. As to the general direction of the flow of Lind 1981 nos. 8, 18.43, 44, 53, 62, 63 and 89, the coins from the AIIl2eri21772 R0772e17221172 to and one with somewhat less than 200 coins, present-day Sweden, Gotland included, I think no. 9 (181 coins). Together these nine hoards it is possible to establish it by comparing the make up about two-thirds of the c. 6,500 finds in Sweden with those 1'rom the areas denarii unearthed on Gotland. (One impor- between the former Roman Empire and Swe- tant find on Gotland, Lind 1981 no. 73, has den of today. I will start with a survey of the been disregarded here. ) In the rest of the general situation in Sweden; after that I will country there are only two hoards of corre- deal with the more important finds in some sponding size, both from the southern part of detail, and then compare them to some finds the mainland, Lind 1981 no. 186 (Skåne), and on the European continent. For reasons that no. 190(Halland), respectively, together com- will become obvious, special attention will be prising more than 80% of the dellelrii found in given to the early coins of the hoards. For the Sweden outside Gotland. sake of convenience I will shorten the argu- Telble l shows the contents of these eleven ment by using only the largest, well-described, hoards (Lind 1981 nos. 8, 18, 44 and 62 with continental European hoards. additions from Lind forthcoming) distributed Finds of 1 or 2 deltarii are not very com- in per cent based on emperors' reigns, the mon in Sweden; most coins belong to hoards periods before 98 and after 192 forming but of varying sizes, some consi sting of hundreds one group each, Nero-Nerva and Pertinax- of coins. The character of the Swedish mate- (Septimius) Severus respecti vely. As for gen- rial is such that even if coins of the period uine Roman coins, these hoard» all consist of prior to Nero are almost totally absent, and dettelrii from the period 64—200, with the ex- coins of the period after Septimius Severus ception of a drachma of Lycia with the portrait are very rare, all emperors within the more of Trajan in no. 62 (it is the only one of its kind coin-concentrated span 64—200 are neverthe- found in Sweden and the only Greek Imperial less represented; and what holds for the mate- silver coin found in Scandinavia). As is clear rial as a whole also holds, by and large, for from Telble I all, with the exception of no. 190 individual finds, on Gotland as well as the (Halland), mainly consist of coins from the Swedish mainland. The most important finds fiveemperors Trajan(98 —117),Hadrian(117— Cnrrent Sreedieli A reAneninet, Vnl. I, 1993 T/te Mottetan Refot ms of tlte Rotnatts 137 138), Antoninus Pius (138—161),Marcus Au- interesting, that just about all hoards of 1,000 relius (161—180) and Commodus (180—192), or more reasonably well-described specimens but with the exception of no. 44 (Gotland) listed in my catalogue (nine in all) are made they all also have coins from before 98 as well up essentially of coins from the period of the as after 192; the latter group is missing in no. Antonines (138—192), with the exception of 44. one find from Czechoslovakia (Lind 1981 no. Eight of the nine hoards from Gotland 394) and one from Rumanian Moldavia (Lind show a clear resernblance to one another. The 1981 no. 403; concerning finds in Rumanian biggest portion in each of them, roughly one- Moldavia, see Mihailescu-Birliba 1980).Also third (29.2—34.4 %) falls to Antoninus Pius' worthy of notice is the pattern of geographical reign; and next in line comes Marcus Aure- distribution: five of these finds of 1,000 coins lius, with one-fourth in each hoard (22. 1 —28.0 or rnore. all with a composition rather similar %): then in seven out of eight cases Hadrian, to that of the larger finds on Gotland (cf. with between 15.6 and 21.0% (in the remain- below), have been discovered at geographical ing case, no. 89, Hadrian has only about 10 localities —in present-day Hungary and Po- %). After thi» it is normally Trajan and Com- land —which follow, or are oriented along, a modus which end up in fourth and fifth posi- roughly straight south-north line —a line go- tion, with roughly one-tenth each (6.
Recommended publications
  • Domitian's Arae Incendii Neroniani in New Flavian Rome
    Rising from the Ashes: Domitian’s Arae Incendii Neroniani in New Flavian Rome Lea K. Cline In the August 1888 edition of the Notizie degli Scavi, profes- on a base of two steps; it is a long, solid rectangle, 6.25 m sors Guliermo Gatti and Rodolfo Lanciani announced the deep, 3.25 m wide, and 1.26 m high (lacking its crown). rediscovery of a Domitianic altar on the Quirinal hill during These dimensions make it the second largest public altar to the construction of the Casa Reale (Figures 1 and 2).1 This survive in the ancient capital. Built of travertine and revet- altar, found in situ on the southeast side of the Alta Semita ted in marble, this altar lacks sculptural decoration. Only its (an important northern thoroughfare) adjacent to the church inscription identifies it as an Ara Incendii Neroniani, an altar of San Andrea al Quirinale, was not unknown to scholars.2 erected in fulfillment of a vow made after the great fire of The site was discovered, but not excavated, in 1644 when Nero (A.D. 64).7 Pope Urban VIII (Maffeo Barberini) and Gianlorenzo Bernini Archaeological evidence attests to two other altars, laid the foundations of San Andrea al Quirinale; at that time, bearing identical inscriptions, excavated in the sixteenth the inscription was removed to the Vatican, and then the and seventeenth centuries; the Ara Incendii Neroniani found altar was essentially forgotten.3 Lanciani’s notes from May on the Quirinal was the last of the three to be discovered.8 22, 1889, describe a fairly intact structure—a travertine block Little is known of the two other altars; one, presumably altar with remnants of a marble base molding on two sides.4 found on the Vatican plain, was reportedly used as building Although the altar’s inscription was not in situ, Lanciani refers material for the basilica of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Vespasian's Apotheosis
    VESPASIAN’S APOTHEOSIS Andrew B. Gallia* In the study of the divinization of Roman emperors, a great deal depends upon the sequence of events. According to the model of consecratio proposed by Bickermann, apotheosis was supposed to be accomplished during the deceased emperor’s public funeral, after which the senate acknowledged what had transpired by decreeing appropriate honours for the new divus.1 Contradictory evidence has turned up in the Fasti Ostienses, however, which seem to indicate that both Marciana and Faustina were declared divae before their funerals took place.2 This suggests a shift * Published in The Classical Quarterly 69.1 (2019). 1 E. Bickermann, ‘Die römische Kaiserapotheosie’, in A. Wlosok (ed.), Römischer Kaiserkult (Darmstadt, 1978), 82-121, at 100-106 (= Archiv für ReligionswissenschaftW 27 [1929], 1-31, at 15-19); id., ‘Consecratio’, in W. den Boer (ed.), Le culte des souverains dans l’empire romain. Entretiens Hardt 19 (Geneva, 1973), 1-37, at 13-25. 2 L. Vidman, Fasti Ostienses (Prague, 19822), 48 J 39-43: IIII k. Septembr. | [Marciana Aug]usta excessit divaq(ue) cognominata. | [Eodem die Mati]dia Augusta cognominata. III | [non. Sept. Marc]iana Augusta funere censorio | [elata est.], 49 O 11-14: X[— k. Nov. Fausti]na Aug[usta excessit eodemq(ue) die a] | senatu diva app[ellata et s(enatus) c(onsultum) fact]um fun[ere censorio eam efferendam.] | Ludi et circenses [delati sunt. — i]dus N[ov. Faustina Augusta funere] | censorio elata e[st]. Against this interpretation of the Marciana fragment (as published by A. Degrassi, Inscr. It. 13.1 [1947], 201) see E.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiberius Nero Caesar (Tiberius) - the Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Volume 3
    Tiberius Nero Caesar (Tiberius) - The Lives Of The Twelve Caesars, Volume 3. C. Suetonius Tranquillus Project Gutenberg's Tiberius Nero Caesar (Tiberius), by C. Suetonius Tranquillus This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net Title: Tiberius Nero Caesar (Tiberius) The Lives Of The Twelve Caesars, Volume 3. Author: C. Suetonius Tranquillus Release Date: December 13, 2004 [EBook #6388] Language: English Character set encoding: ASCII *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK TIBERIUS NERO CAESAR *** Produced by Tapio Riikonen and David Widger THE LIVES OF THE TWELVE CAESARS By C. Suetonius Tranquillus; To which are added, HIS LIVES OF THE GRAMMARIANS, RHETORICIANS, AND POETS. The Translation of Alexander Thomson, M.D. revised and corrected by T.Forester, Esq., A.M. Livros Grátis http://www.livrosgratis.com.br Milhares de livros grátis para download. TIBERIUS NERO CAESAR. (192) I. The patrician family of the Claudii (for there was a plebeian family of the same name, no way inferior to the other either in power or dignity) came originally from Regilli, a town of the Sabines. They removed thence to Rome soon after the building of the city, with a great body of their dependants, under Titus Tatius, who reigned jointly with Romulus in the kingdom; or, perhaps, what is related upon better authority, under Atta Claudius, the head of the family, who was admitted by the senate into the patrician order six years after the expulsion of the Tarquins.
    [Show full text]
  • Manuel II Palaiologos' Point of View
    The Hidden Secrets: Late Byzantium in the Western and Polish Context Małgorzata Dąbrowska The Hidden Secrets: Late Byzantium in the Western and Polish Context Małgorzata Dąbrowska − University of Łódź, Faculty of Philosophy and History Department of Medieval History, 90-219 Łódź, 27a Kamińskiego St. REVIEWERS Maciej Salamon, Jerzy Strzelczyk INITIATING EDITOR Iwona Gos PUBLISHING EDITOR-PROOFREADER Tomasz Fisiak NATIVE SPEAKERS Kevin Magee, François Nachin TECHNICAL EDITOR Leonora Wojciechowska TYPESETTING AND COVER DESIGN Katarzyna Turkowska Cover Image: Last_Judgment_by_F.Kavertzas_(1640-41) commons.wikimedia.org Printed directly from camera-ready materials provided to the Łódź University Press This publication is not for sale © Copyright by Małgorzata Dąbrowska, Łódź 2017 © Copyright for this edition by Uniwersytet Łódzki, Łódź 2017 Published by Łódź University Press First edition. W.07385.16.0.M ISBN 978-83-8088-091-7 e-ISBN 978-83-8088-092-4 Printing sheets 20.0 Łódź University Press 90-131 Łódź, 8 Lindleya St. www.wydawnictwo.uni.lodz.pl e-mail: [email protected] tel. (42) 665 58 63 CONTENTS Preface 7 Acknowledgements 9 CHAPTER ONE The Palaiologoi Themselves and Their Western Connections L’attitude probyzantine de Saint Louis et les opinions des sources françaises concernant cette question 15 Is There any Room on the Bosporus for a Latin Lady? 37 Byzantine Empresses’ Mediations in the Feud between the Palaiologoi (13th–15th Centuries) 53 Family Ethos at the Imperial Court of the Palaiologos in the Light of the Testimony by Theodore of Montferrat 69 Ought One to Marry? Manuel II Palaiologos’ Point of View 81 Sophia of Montferrat or the History of One Face 99 “Vasilissa, ergo gaude...” Cleopa Malatesta’s Byzantine CV 123 Hellenism at the Court of the Despots of Mistra in the First Half of the 15th Century 135 4 • 5 The Power of Virtue.
    [Show full text]
  • Magic and the Roman Emperors
    1 MAGIC AND THE ROMAN EMPERORS (1 Volume) Submitted by Georgios Andrikopoulos, to the University of Exeter as a thesis/dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics, July 2009. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. ..................................... (signature) 2 Abstract Roman emperors, the details of their lives and reigns, their triumphs and failures and their representation in our sources are all subjects which have never failed to attract scholarly attention. Therefore, in view of the resurgence of scholarly interest in ancient magic in the last few decades, it is curious that there is to date no comprehensive treatment of the subject of the frequent connection of many Roman emperors with magicians and magical practices in ancient literature. The aim of the present study is to explore the association of Roman emperors with magic and magicians, as presented in our sources. This study explores the twofold nature of this association, namely whether certain emperors are represented as magicians themselves and employers of magicians or whether they are represented as victims and persecutors of magic; furthermore, it attempts to explore the implications of such associations in respect of the nature and the motivations of our sources. The case studies of emperors are limited to the period from the establishment of the Principate up to the end of the Severan dynasty, culminating in the short reign of Elagabalus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Madness of Isolation in Suetonius' “Caligula” and “Nero”
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Lewis Honors College Capstone Collection Lewis Honors College 2020 ‘De Monstris’: The Madness of Isolation in Suetonius’ “Caligula” and “Nero” Maya Menon University of Kentucky, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/honprog Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Menon, Maya, "‘De Monstris’: The Madness of Isolation in Suetonius’ “Caligula” and “Nero”" (2020). Lewis Honors College Capstone Collection. 50. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/honprog/50 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Lewis Honors College at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Lewis Honors College Capstone Collection by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ‘De Monstris’: The Madness of Isolation in Suetonius’ “Caligula” and “Nero” ​ ​ Maya Menon MCL 495-001: Capstone Dr. Matthew Wells December 2, 2020 Menon 2 The emperors Gaius Caesar ‘Caligula’ (r. 37-41 CE) and Nero (r. 54-68 CE) are regarded as some of Rome’s most infamous and notorious rulers due to their erratic, destructive, and complex behaviors. In his biographical work The Lives of the Caesars, the literary artist Gaius ​ ​ Suetonius Tranquillus (c. 69-122 CE) provides a concise, informative, and illustrative depiction of the reigns of these two emperors. Suetonius’ particular literary technique and style used in the narration for both Nero and Caligula contributes to an enduring legacy of madness and depravity that has been influential in our understanding of these two rulers well into the modern age.
    [Show full text]
  • Constantine's Effect on Early Christianity
    Constantine’s Effect on Early Christianity Jo Ann Shcall Constantine! When you hear his name, do you think of the power and brutality of the Roman Empire, or do you think of the founding of formalized Christianity? Was Constantine good, bad, a mixture? There’s evidence for each position. Why Consider Constantine? The Orthodox Church regards Constantine as Saint Constantine the Great. He did much for the early Christian church from 306 to 337 while he was the Roman Emperor. Constantine was the first Roman Emperor to claim conversion to Christianity. His declaration of the Edict of Milan in 313 is one of his most important early contributions. This edict declared that Christians (and all other religions) would be tolerated throughout the empire, bringing an end to religious persecution. Constantine called together the first council of Nicaea in 325 with 250 mostly Eastern bishops1 resulting in the Nicene Creed, a statement of faith that attempted to unite disparate Christian communities.2 Constantine built the Church of the Holy Sepulcher at the purported site of Jesus’ tomb, which became the holiest site in Christendom. During his reign, he built many basilicas, repaired churches throughout the empire, relieved clergy of some taxes, supported the Christian church financially3 and saw that Sunday was designated as a day of rest for all citizens. He promoted Christians into political offices. Constantine decided his capitol should be moved to Byzantium. He did extensive building in this city, then renamed it Constantinople. This “new city” was said to be protected by relics of the True Cross, the Rod of Moses, and other holy relics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Millennium
    The Roman Millennium Written by Frank L. Holt Photographs courtesy of Frank L. Holt Collection The earnest crowds that gathered across Christian Europe 1000 years ago for "Y1K" were not the first to mark such an occasion; nor were we the second to do so on January 1, 2000. The original millennial celebration in western calendrical history reverberated across the Roman Empire in "Anno ML AUC"—otherwise known as the year AD 248, according to the later Gregorian calendar, which calculated from the birth of Jesus rather than the founding of rome. Like "Y2K" today, the Roman millennium celebration in 248 was extensive and bureaucratic, laden with official messages of inspiration and private hopes for human progress, but it took place in a world that, to its inhabitants, was far more insecure than ours, and it was masterminded by an emperor of unlikely heritage. Marcus Julius Philippus, who was known as "Philip the Arab," hailed from Arabia Trachonitis, now part of Syria. This, and the fact of his humble birth, brought him scorn from Roman aristocrats who believed, however illogically, that such provinces were inhabited solely by bandits. In fact, we know that Philip and his brother, Caius Julius Priscus, were sons of one Julius Marinus, and they were born in Shahba, a town that still exists today 100 kilometers (62 mi) east of the Sea of Galilee, and which, after Philip's accession, was renamed Philippopolis. Philip was born about 204, in the years of the Severan emperors, and both boys witnessed the growing autocracy and militarism of the Roman Empire as its rulers struggled to meet new dangers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alleged Persecution of the Roman Christians by the Emperor Domitian
    Edith Cowan University Research Online Theses: Doctorates and Masters Theses 1-1-2005 The alleged persecution of the Roman Christians by the emperor Domitian Ken Laffer Edith Cowan University Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation Laffer, K. (2005). The alleged persecution of the Roman Christians by the emperor Domitian. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/639 This Thesis is posted at Research Online. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/639 Edith Cowan University Copyright Warning You may print or download ONE copy of this document for the purpose of your own research or study. The University does not authorize you to copy, communicate or otherwise make available electronically to any other person any copyright material contained on this site. You are reminded of the following: Copyright owners are entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. A reproduction of material that is protected by copyright may be a copyright infringement. Where the reproduction of such material is done without attribution of authorship, with false attribution of authorship or the authorship is treated in a derogatory manner, this may be a breach of the author’s moral rights contained in Part IX of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Courts have the power to impose a wide range of civil and criminal sanctions for infringement of copyright, infringement of moral rights and other offences under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Higher penalties may apply, and higher damages may be awarded, for offences and infringements involving the conversion of material into digital or electronic form.
    [Show full text]
  • Flavian Visual Propaganda : Building a Dynasty
    Constructing the Past Volume 8 Issue 1 Article 10 Spring 2007 Flavian Visual Propaganda : Building a Dynasty Michael Vasta Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing Recommended Citation Vasta, Michael (2007) "Flavian Visual Propaganda : Building a Dynasty," Constructing the Past: Vol. 8 : Iss. 1 , Article 10. Available at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing/vol8/iss1/10 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by editorial board of the Undergraduate Economic Review and the Economics Department at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Flavian Visual Propaganda : Building a Dynasty Abstract The Flavian triumph itself was a complex and elaborate pageant that must be examined in each of its parts. It, as Beard persuasively argues, was designed to be the “Flavian coronation, the official launch party and press night of the Flavian dynasty.” The usurpers are transformed into an “established imperial dynasty” and Titus changes from “conqueror of Jerusalem to Flavian Caesar.” The triumph is the beginning of the propaganda program designed to give legitimacy to Vespasian and his sons.
    [Show full text]
  • Remilitarising the Byzantine Imperial Image: a Study of Numismatic Evidence and Other Visual Media 1042-1453
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository REMILITARISING THE BYZANTINE IMPERIAL IMAGE: A STUDY OF NUMISMATIC EVIDENCE AND OTHER VISUAL MEDIA 1042-1453 by MICHAEL STEPHEN SAXBY A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham March 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The messages in the imagery on Byzantine coins, although often neglected by scholars, were a key means of projecting imperial power. Emperors could project power via dress, ceremonial, and displays, but these methods would not have reached all subjects. Byzantine coins had the advantage of reaching all subjects, as the Byzantine economy was fundamentally monetized. Military symbols (figures, dress, and weapons), whose study has been rather overlooked, formed an important part of this imagery. Whilst military symbols disappeared from Byzantine coins in the early eighth century, and were absent for some three centuries, they were reintroduced in the mid-eleventh century and appeared until 1394/5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reforms of Trajan and the End of the Pre–Neronian Denarius
    AIIN, 61 (2015), pp. 21–42 THE REFORMS OF TRAJAN AND THE END OF THE PRE–NERONIAN DENARIUS Numismatists habitually attribute the creation of Roman imperial coinage to Augustus, and commonly refer to imperial currency as ‘Augustan’.1 Consequently any changes to the imperial coinage tend to be regarded as adulterations of this original ‘Augustan system’. The changes that took place under Nero, for example, are usually treated as the first signs of thoughtless manipulation of this system, and in addition these changes are understood as evidence of the empire’s financial weakness.2 The same is claimed of Trajan’s changes to the denarius and aureus.3 However, other interpretations of these changes are possible, and this paper attempts to set out evidence to support the argument that the Neronian and Trajanic reforms are linked, and that both were attempts to establish a stable currency. It is quite clear that Nero’s role in establishing a stable currency has been understated or completely misunderstood. Thanks to new compositional and metrological studies it is now possible to appreciate the importance of the Neronian reforms.4 It was the Neronian aureus and denarius standards, and not the Augustan, that persisted through the first and second centuries. As far as the precious metal issues are concerned, the Neronian coinage marked the beginning of a new era. Subsequent emperors continued to maintain these standards (with one 1 HARL 1996: 73–96. 2 CRAWFORD 1978: 151–2; WALKER 1978: 110–14; DUNCAN–JONES 1994: 221 n. 35. 3 BOLIN 1958: 201; WALKER 1978: 151–3.
    [Show full text]