“Talkin' Bout Practice” Ebook
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2019-20 MANUAL 2020 DIVISION II MEN’S and WOMEN’S BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIP HOST OPERATIONS MANUAL TABLE of CONTENTS No
2019-20 MANUAL 2020 DIVISION II MEN’S AND WOMEN’S BASKETBALL CHAMPIONSHIP HOST OPERATIONS MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS No. SECTION PAGE Introduction 1 Mission Statement 2 NCAA Men’s Basketball Committee and NCAA Staff Directory 3 NCAA Women’s Basketball Committee and NCAA Staff Directory 5 1 Awards and Mementos 7 2 Bands/Spirit Squads and Mascots 11 3 Banquet (Finals only) 12 4 Broadcasting/Internet 13 5 Commercialism/Contributors 13 6 Community Engagement (Finals only) 18 7 Critical Incident Response/Emergency Plan 19 8 Drug Testing 21 9 Competition Site, Equipment and Space Requirements 24 10 Financial Administration 30 11 Game Management 31 12 Insurance 34 13 Lodging 35 14 Meeting/Schedule of Events 37 15 Media/Credentials 37 16 Medical Procedures 46 17 Merchandise/Licensing 49 18 Officials 51 19 Participating Teams 52 20 Promotions and Marketing 53 21 Practices 57 22 Programs 58 23 Safety and Security Plan 61 24 Security 62 25 Tickets/Seating 63 26 Transportation 65 27 Volunteers 65 APPENDIXES A Credentials B Crowd Control/Corporate Champions/Partners Statement C Instructions for Public Address Announcer D Tournament Director’s Abbreviated Checklist E Neutrality Guidelines F Spit-Regional Schedule G Volunteer Waiver of Liability Form H Ticket Back Disclaimer I Social Media Guidelines J Microsite Guidelines K Regional Video Streaming Requirements L Guide to Live Video and Stats M Protective Security Advisor Information INTRODUCTION On behalf of the NCAA Division II Men’s and Women’s Basketball Committees, thank you for being an important part of the 2020 NCAA Division II Men’s and Women’s Basketball Championships. -
2019-2021 NCAA WOMEN's BASKETBALL GAME ADMINISTRATION and TABLE CREW REFERENCE SHEET GAME ADMINISTRATION Game Administration
2019-2021 NCAA WOMEN’S BASKETBALL GAME ADMINISTRATION AND TABLE CREW REFERENCE SHEET Edited by Jon M. Levinson, Women’s Basketball Secretary-Rules Editor [email protected] GAME ADMINISTRATION Game administration shall make available an individual at each basket with a device capable of untangling the net when necessary. The individual must ensure that play has clearly moved away from the affected basket before going onto the playing court. SCORER It is strongly recommended that the scorer be present at the table with no less than 15 minutes remaining on the pregame clock. Signals 1. For a team’s fifth foul, the scorer will display two fingers and verbally state the team is in the bonus. The public- address announcer is not to announce the number of team fouls beyond the fifth team foul. 2. in a game with replay equipment, record the time on the game clock when the official signals for reviewing a two- or three-point goal. 3. For a disqualified player, the scorer will inform the officials as soon as possible by displaying five fingers with an open hand and verbally state that this is the fifth foul on the number of the disqualified player. New Rules 1. During two- or three-shot free throw situations, substitutes are permitted before the first attempt or when the last attempt is successful. 2. A replaced player may reenter the game before the game clock has properly started and stopped when the opposing team has committed a foul or violation. GAME CLOCK TIMER TIMER must: 1. Confirm with the officials that the game clock is operating properly, which includes displaying tenths-of-a-second under one minute, the horn is operating, and the red/LED lights are functioning. -
2020-09-Basketball-Officials-Test
RULE TEST 1 Q1 - A5 is fouled and is awarded 2 free throws. After the first, the officials discover that B4 is bleeding. B4 is replaced by B7. Team A is entitled to substitute only 1 player. TRUE. Q2 - A3 passes the ball from the 3 point area. When the ball is above the ring, B1 reaches through the basket from below and touches the ball. This is an interference violation and 2 poiints shall be awarded to Team A. FALSE. Q3 - A2 attempts a shot for a field goal with 20 seconds on the shot clock. The ball touches the ring, rebounds and A1 gains control of the ball in Team A backcourt. The shot clock shall show 14 seconds as soon as A1 gains control of the ball. TRUE Q4 - During a pass by A4 to A5, the ball touches B1 after which the ball touches the ring. Then, A1 gains control of the ball. The shot clock shall show 14 seconds as soon as the ball touches the ring. FALSE. Q5 - A3 attempts a successful shot for a 3-points field goal and approximately at the same time, the game clock signal sounds for the end of the quarter. The officials are not sure if A1 has touched the boundary line on his shot. The IRS can be reviewed to decide if the out-of-bounds violation occurred and, in such a case, how much time shall be shown on the game clock. TRUE. Q6 - A2 in the act of shooting is fouled simultaneously with the game clock signal for the end of the first quarter. -
Optimizing End of Quarter Shot-Timing in the NBA: "Everyone Knows About the 2 for 1, but What About the 3 for 2?"
Optimizing End Of Quarter Shot-Timing In The NBA: "Everyone Knows About The 2 For 1, But What About The 3 For 2?" Jesse Fischer B.S. Computer Engineering, University of Washington Senior Software Engineer, Amazon.com [email protected] www.tothemean.com Abstract Since the advent of the shot clock, the "2-for-1" has become a common end of quarter strategy in the NBA. With this approach, a team will strategically time their shot in hopes of ensuring a second possession while limiting their opponent to a single possession. Prior research has shown the effectiveness of the "2-for-1" strategy but no well-known public study has explored extending this strategy to "3-for-2" or beyond. This paper summarizes a study which: (1) analyzes the effects that possession timing has on behavior as well as outcome; (2) quantifies the cost-benefit tradeoff of strategically "timing a possession;" and (3) proposes the optimal possession timing strategy to maximize expected points (as opposed to simply possessions). The research reveals how to improve end of quarter behavior in the NBA by better understanding the math behind why, and when, a "2-for-1" is beneficial and suggests how to extend this further to a "3-for-2". Introduction The average value of a possession in the NBA is estimated at just over 1 point [1]. If a team is able to capture an extra possession in only half of those quarters, this could mean the difference between a team winning a game and potentially making the playoffs. The 2013-2014 Phoenix Suns are an example of a team where extra possessions could have made a big difference. -
24 SECOND CLOCK Once a Team Gains Control of the Basketball, That
24 SECOND CLOCK Once a team gains control of the basketball, that team has 24 seconds to put up a legal shot. A legal shot is defined as a shot that is successful, or if unsuccessful, hits the ring. That shot has to be in the air (left the shooters hand) , before 24 secs has elapsed. So if the clock sounds after the shot is in the air, and that shot is successful, or hits the ring, that is NOT a violation. The shot clock starts when a team gains procession of the ball, and can re set when procession changes, a violation occurs, a foul occurs, a jump ball, or a legal shot hits the ring. The 24 second clock operates on team procession. Team A has procession, until Team B gains procession. So if Team A has control of the ball, then a player from team B happens to tap it, but not gain control, then Team A is in still in control. Basically it is mine until it is yours A player, therefore a team, is in control of the ball when they have it in 2 hands, or they are in a position to dribble the ball. So a player who jumps in the air and flings the ball back into court is not in control of the ball. At the beginning of a game, the game clock starts when the ball is legally tapped by a player. The shot clock does not start until a player has gained control of the ball. Once a player has gained control, his team has 24 seconds to get a shot off. -
Analysis of Different Types of Turnovers Between Winning and Losing Performances in Men’S NCAA Basketball
한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지 Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information Vol. 25 No. 7, pp. 135-142, July 2020 JKSCI https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2020.25.07.135 Analysis of different types of turnovers between winning and losing performances in men’s NCAA basketball 1)Doryung Han*, Mark Hawkins**, HyongJun Choi*** *Honorary principal professor, Major of Security secretary Studies Continuing Education Center, Kyonggi University, Seoul, Korea **Head coach, Performance Analysis of Sport, University of Wales, UK ***Associate Professor, Dept. of Physical Education (Performance Analysis in Sport), Dankook University, Yongin, Korea [Abstract] Basketball is a highly complex sport, analyses offensive and defensive rebounds, free throw percentages, minutes played and an efficiency rating. These statistics can have a large bearing and provide a lot of pressure on players as their every move can be analysed. Performance analysis in sport is a vital way of being able to track a team or individuals performance and more commonly used resource for player and team development. Discovering information such as this proves the importance of these types of analysis as with post competition video analysis a coach can reach a far more accurate analysis of the game leading to the ability to coach and correct the exact requirements of the team instead of their perceptions. A significant difference was found between winning and losing performances for different types of turnovers supporting current research that states that turnovers are not a valid predictor of match outcomes and that there is no specific type of turnover which can predict the outcome of a match as briefly mentioned in Curz and Tavares (1998). -
Tennessee 93 South Carolina 73 Feb. 17, 2021 | Thompson-Boling Arena | Knoxville, Tenn
Tennessee 93 South Carolina 73 Feb. 17, 2021 | Thompson-Boling Arena | Knoxville, Tenn. Tennessee Head Coach Rick Barnes On what he thought of VJ and Fulky’s performance tonight: “Again, the last couple of days of practice we were short of guys, and we just individually kept talking to guys that they have to get themselves involved, because we can only do so much from a coaching staff standpoint. Our offense since Fulky has been here hasn’t changed a whole lot, and if it had changed some, it’s because we have had to take advantage of some other talent. Otherwise, his position really hasn’t changed that much. We said they’re going to have to do it. I thought he did the best job of running tonight that he’s done all year. He really ran the floor hard and again I think he’s got to play quicker in the post, and he is wanting to catch it and spin and do this and that. He’s not going to get time to do that, unless he does his work early. With VJ, the last two days Santi wasn’t able to practice, so those three guys worked together, and I thought it probably helped VJ as much as any the last two days playing the point, and understanding what we want to do, and I thought he did a really good job with it.” On what the last few days were like with COVID circumstances: “Well, we knew regardless if the test results came back, we had to play by rule. -
FIBA Official Interpretations 2019, JAN 2019
2020 OFFICIAL BASKETBALL RULES OBRI – OFFICIAL INTERPRETATIONS Valid as of 1st January 2021 1 January 2021 version 2.0 Official Basketball Rules 2020 Official Interpretations Valid as of 1st January 2021 The colours demonstrate the content that was updated. (Yellow version) Page 2 of 112 OFFICIAL BASKETBALL RULES INTERPRETATIONS 1 January 2021 version 2.0 In case you find any inconsistency or error, please report the problem to: [email protected] 1 January 2021 version 2.0 OFFICIAL BASKETBALL RULES INTERPRETATIONS Page 3 of 112 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Article 4 Teams ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Article 5 Players: Injury and assistance .................................................................................................... 7 Article 7 Head coach and first assistant coach: Duties and Powers ................................................. 10 Article 8 Playing time, tied score and overtime ...................................................................................... 12 Article 9 Beginning and end of a quarter, overtime or the game ........................................................ 14 Article 10 Status of the ball ......................................................................................................................... -
Ranking the Greatest NBA Players: an Analytics Analysis
1 Ranking the Greatest NBA Players: An Analytics Analysis An Honors Thesis by Jeremy Mertz Thesis Advisor Dr. Lawrence Judge Ball State University Muncie, Indiana July 2015 Expected Date of Graduation May 2015 1-' ,II L II/du, t,- i II/em' /.. 2 ?t; q ·7t./ 2 (11 S Ranking the Greatest NBA Players: An Analytics Analysis . Iv/If 7 Abstract The purpose of this investigation was to present a statistical model to help rank top National Basketball Association (NBA) players of all time. As the sport of basketball evolves, the debate on who is the greatest player of all-time in the NBA never seems to reach consensus. This ongoing debate can sometimes become emotional and personal, leading to arguments and in extreme cases resulting in violence and subsequent arrest. Creating a statistical model to rank players may also help coaches determine important variables for player development and aid in future approaches to the game via key data-driven performance indicators. However, computing this type of model is extremely difficult due to the many individual player statistics and achievements to consider, as well as the impact of changes to the game over time on individual player performance analysis. This study used linear regression to create an accurate model for the top 150 player rankings. The variables computed included: points per game, rebounds per game, assists per game, win shares per 48 minutes, and number ofNBA championships won. The results revealed that points per game, rebounds per game, assists per game, and NBA championships were all necessary for an accurate model and win shares per 48 minutes were not significant. -
ONE and DONE One and Done: Examining the Relationship
One and Done: Examining the Relationship Between Years of College Basketball Experience and Career Statistics in the National Basketball Association Item Type Article Authors Zestcott, Colin A.; Dickens, Jessie; Bracamonte, Noah; Stone, Jeff; Harrison, C. Keith Citation Zestcott, C. A., Dickens, J., Bracamonte, N., Stone, J., & Harrison, C. K. (2020). One and Done: Examining the Relationship Between Years of College Basketball Experience and Career Statistics in the National Basketball Association. Journal of Sport and Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723520919815 DOI 10.1177/0193723520919815 Publisher SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC Journal JOURNAL OF SPORT & SOCIAL ISSUES Rights © The Author(s) 2020. Download date 30/09/2021 22:27:17 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final accepted manuscript Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/641584 ONE AND DONE 1 One and Done: Examining the Relationship Between Years of College Basketball Experience and Career statistics in the National Basketball Association ONE AND DONE 2 Abstract Since 2006, the so-called one and done rule prevents American high school players from joining the National Basketball Association (NBA) without at least one year of college basketball experience. While there is debate about the pros and cons of the one and done rule, few studies have fully examined how minimal (or no) college experience relates to performance in the NBA. The current study used publicly available offensive and defensive statistics for all players in the NBA from 1995-2016, to examine the relationship between years of college experience and career success in the NBA. Results showed that players with less college experience had better offensive, defensive, and advanced metric (PER and VORP) statistics than players with more college experience. -
Georgia Tech Basketball 2018-19
2018-19 GEORGIA TECH BASKETBALL GAME NOTES @GTMBB • @GTJOSHPASTNER GEORGIA TECH BASKETBALL 2018-19 ACC Champions 1985, 1990, 1993 • Final Four 1990, 2004 • 16 NCAA Tournament appearances GEORGIA TECH SEASON REVIEW 2018-19 Schedule/Results Final Record: 14-18 overall, 6-12 ACC (10th place) N3 FLORIDA TECH (exhibition) W, 87-36 In a Nutshell GEORGIA TECH AT-A-GLANCE N9 LAMAR W, 88-69 Georgia Tech (14-18, 6-12 ACC) completed its third N13 at Tennessee (5/6) L, 53-66 season under head coach Josh Pastner by earning the No. 10 2018-19 rankings (AP/coaches/NET) nr | nr | 126 N16 EAST CAROLINA W, 79-54 seed for ACC Tournament, its highest since 2016, by defeating 2018-19 record 14-18 (11-7 home, 3-9 away, 0-2 neutral) N21 UT RIO GRANDE VALLEY W, 72-44 Boston College (81-78 in overtime at home) and NC State (63- ACC record 6-12 (10th place) N23 PRAIRIE VIEW A&M W, 65-54 61 on the road) in its final two regular season games. The Yellow ACC Tournament (10 seed) lost to Notre Dame (78-71), 1st round N28 at Northwestern+ L, 61-67 Jackets were eliminated in the opening round by Notre Dame, Head coach Josh Pastner (Arizona, 1997) D1 vs. St. John’s [Miami, Fla.]# (rv) L, 73-76 78-71. D9 FLORIDA A&M W, 73-40 Career record/at GT 215-126 (10th yr) | 48-53 (3rd yr) D17 GARDNER-WEBB L, 69-79 Starting Lineup Starters Returning/Lost *5/0 D19 at Arkansas W, 69-65 • Rise above - The Yellow Jackets finished the season Letterwinners Returning/Lost 10/5 D22 GEORGIA L, 59-70 10th in the ACC after being projected to finish no higher than *based on end-of-season starting five D28 KENNESAW STATE W, 87-57 13th in the preseason. -
Scorer's Course
SCORER’S COURSE An Introductory Guide to Scoring a Basketball Game ABOUT THESE MATERIALS Basketball Australia has been a world leader in the education of score-table officials for more than two decades. Our materials have been utilised by FIBA and our educators are renowned as amongst the best in the world. This resource has been revised as at February 2020 and incorporates the Official Basketball Rules as at October 2018 and the Official Interpretations as of 31 January 2019. Many people have contributed to the education materials over the years and Basketball Australia (and basketball in Australia) is indebted to everyone who has contributed. The materials are currently edited by the National Scoretable Committee: Libby Woods (Chair), WA Trevor Baker, SA David Booth, VIC Margaret Nothrop, TAS Naree Wittwer, QLD Lesley Stowers, NT Michelle Nicholas, NSW Anne-Marie Taylor and Carolyn Ackland, ACT This introductory course is designed for parents, players and supporters who find themselves needing to score a basketball game! Basketball has a huge reach with more than 20,000 games of basketball being played in Australia each week, the need for scoretable officials is massive! It is only in a small fraction of these games that scorers are provide and in most competitions it is common for teams to share duty (often the parents in junior games) or a team will do duty on another game. Courses are run regularly throughout the country. For more information on becoming a scoretable official, contact the relevant state/territory body (https://australia.basketball/participate/state-contacts/) who will put you in contact with one of the 413 local associations around the country.