<<

arXiv:2004.00119v1 [nucl-ex] 31 Mar 2020 eetyteehsbe infiatporse ndeter- of in site(s) progresses astrophysical significant the been mining has there Recently hss w promising Two thesis. o raigaothl ftesal ulibyn the with suc- intertwined beyond of mechanism captures nuclei production neutron stable a cessive the through of of half about creating for egrhscnre httelte ieproduces site latter star the neutron that binary confirmed a has from Gravita- merger of (GW170817) detection binaries Waves first star tional historical su- neutron The II of [6–11]. Type coalescence (NSNS) of and wind [2–5] neutrino pernovae high-entropy the cussion: GB787) nw saklnv,wsblee obe Burst to believed Gamma-Ray was kilonova, short a as a known (GRB170817A), following near-infrared source optical an of transient generation The nuclei. process .Kojouharov, I. h ai eto-atr ( neutron-capture rapid The .A S¨oderstr¨om,P.-A. .Schaffner, H. .L el Garrote, Bello L. F. .Baba, H. β .Lorusso, G. DcyHl-ie f5 eto-ihIooe eodthe beyond Isotopes Neutron-Rich 55 of Half-Lives -Decay .Wu, J. 16 8 eateto hsc,OaaUiest,Machikaneyama-m University, Osaka Physics, of Department RNC colo hsc n ula nryEgneig B Engineering, Energy Nuclear and Physics of School IRCNPC, 3 25 .Mle cetfi optn n rpis n. .O o 1 Box O. P. Inc., Graphics, and Computing Scientific Moller P. cus h aflvshv nipratlclipc nthe on impact local important an have conditions half-lives astrophysical of the variety occurs, wide a For osynthesis. odfrain a ag ffc ntehl-ie.Teimpa The s is half-lives. elements the heavy the on of effect origin astrophysical large the a modeling has deformation, to RB)epoigtepoetl sinfamnsof fragments fission projectile the employing (RIBF) 142 14 eerhCne o ula hsc RN) sk Universi Osaka (RCNP), Physics Nuclear for Center Research 4 23 18 The 2 hoeia iiin o lmsNtoa aoaoy Los Laboratory, National Alamos Los Division, Theoretical eateto hsc,Uiest fTko og --,Bu 7-3-1, Hongo Tokyo, of University Physics, of Department ,2 1, − 11 22 aeIooeSinePoet nttt o ai Science, Basic for Institute Project, Science Rare 21 etrfrNcerSuy(N) nvriyo oy,Wako-s Tokyo, of University (CNS), Study Nuclear for Center 148 .Browne, F. 24 22 ainlPyia aoaoy P,Tdigo,Middlesex Teddington, NPL, Laboratory, Physical National 22 12 H,CR,I23adUiest fSrsor,F607Stra F-67037 Strasbourg, of University and IN2P3 CNRS, PHC, .Komatsubara, T. 5 17 .Nishimura, S. eateto hsc,Uiest fNteDm,NteDame Notre Dame, Notre of University Physics, of Department S emotznrmfu cwroefrcugGb,642 GmbH, f¨ur Schwerionenforschung Helmholtzzentrum GSI Xe, PC NP/NS nvriyo tabug -73 Stras F-67037 Strasbourg, of University IN2P3/CNRS, IPHC, 6 15 eateto hsc,Uiest fSre,GidodGU2 Guildford Surrey, of University Physics, of Department ,1,12 11, 2, β 10 eateto hsc,teUiest fHn og Pokfula Kong, Hong of University the Physics, of Department SS,I23CR,Uiest ai-aly -10 Orsa F-91405 Paris-Saclay, University IN2P3/CNRS, CSNSM, .M Sprouse, M. T. 1 dcyhl-ie f5 eto-ihnuclei neutron-rich 55 of half-lives -decay eateto hsc,Uiest fYr,Hsigo,Yor Heslington, York, of University Physics, of Department hsc iiin ron ainlLbrtr,Agne I Argonne, Laboratory, National Argonne Division, Physics 7 eateto hsc,CugAgUiest,Sol06974, Seoul University, Chung-Ang Physics, of Department 2 13 2 aut fSine oe nvriy hn-a 19,Rep 31499, Chung-Nam University, Hoseo Science, of Faculty 145 IE ihn etr - ioaa aosi atm 351- Saitama Wako-shi, Hirosawa, 2-1 Center, Nishina RIKEN r eateto hsc,KraUiest,Sol081 Repu 02841, Seoul University, Korea Physics, of Department .Sumikama, T. poesstsaeafcso dis- of focus a are sites -process 19 − 19 151 .Moon, B. .M Daugas, M. J. ,2 9, nvriyo so ..Bx17 lnen 36Ol,Norwa Oslo, 0316 Blindern, 1072 Box P.O. Oslo, of University nvriyo rgtn rgtnB24J ntdKingdom United 4GJ, BN2 Brighton Brighton, of University Cs, r .Daido, R. )poesi responsible is process -) 2 9 148 20 colo optn,EgneigadMathematics, and Engineering Computing, of School .M¨oller,P. E,DM I,F927ApjnCdx France Cedex, Arpajon F-91297 DIF, DAM, CEA, − 2 24 r 13 153 poesnucleosyn- -process .Kubo, T. .Suzuki, H. 2 .Patel, Z. Ba, .Watanabe, H. 8 20 .Doornenbal, P. 151 β 3 .Didierjean, F. − eas[1]. decays .R Mumpower, R. M. 2 155 2 2 12, Dtd pi ,2020) 2, April (Dated: .Kurz, N. 2 awr esrda h aiatv stp emFactory Beam Isotope Radioactive the at measured were La .Takeda, H. .Rice, S. 6 2 16, r - 22 2 21 .Y Xu, Y. Z. .Y Kwon, Y. K. .F Fang, F. Y. 2 2 12, hp rniin rmshrclt eomdnce and nuclei deformed to spherical example neu- for from shells, transitions and nuclear closed shape are near masses occurring challenging nuclear issues Particularly structure as rates. such capture tron quantities, compared studies other experimental to in accessed readily more calculate to necessary are that properties will modeling [16]. and required work be experimental observations, ical e otiuinto valuable contribution a constitute new observations recent the these of Although nuclei neutron-rich the of in decay occurring radioactive the by produced otntl,teciia nu of endeavor. input this in critical challenges main the the Fortunately, of one is osynthesis 238 .Fukuda, N. 2 bann h ag muto nesrdnuclear unmeasured of amount large the Obtaining .Tanaka, M. 134 .Tencerlvlsrcue hc relates which structure, level nuclear The U. .Sakurai, H. 4 nldn hs nwihfiso recycling fission which in those including , − .Lozeva, R. ci11 sk 6-03Tynk,Japan Toyonaka, 560-0043 Osaka 1-1, achi uidi h otx of context the in tudied 139 7 14 17, eod( second iagUiest,Biig109,China 100191, Beijing University, eihang Sn, ajo 44,Rpbi fKorea of Republic 34047, Daejeon lms e eio855 USA 87545, Mexico New Alamos, 8 to el-esrdhl-ie on half-lives newly-measured of ct y brk,Oaa5704,Japan 567-0047, Osaka Ibaraki, ty, 23 2 4,LsAao,N 74,USA 87544, NM Alamos, Los 440, .Haroon, M. kok,1303 oy,Japan Tokyo, 113-0033 nkyo-ku, W10W ntdKingdom United 0LW, TW11 .Yagi, A. .Inabe, N. 134 25 .Morimoto, S. i atm 5-18 Japan 351-0198, Saitama hi, ,14 2, A 1Drsat Germany Darmstadt, 91 ,6 5, − .Tshoo, K. or ee ,France 2, Cedex bourg X,Uie Kingdom United 7XH, ,Y1 D,U.K. 5DD, YO10 k, lni 03,USA 60439, llinois 142 ≈ bugCdx2 France 2, Cedex sbourg od ogKong Hong Road, m nin 65,USA 46556, Indiana , eulco Korea of Republic aps France Campus, y .Shimizu, Y. .B Moon, B. C. Sb, 3)peak. 130) bi fKorea of ublic 8 r lco Korea of blic poessuis oeastronom- more studies, -process 18 Japan 0198, .Yokoyama, R. 2 8 137 .Ishigaki, T. .Isobe, T. 23 − 8 N 144 y r .Murai, D. n .Wakabayashi Y. and 8 hl Gap Shell =82 rcs nucle- process Te, 2 7 .Sinclair, L. β .Odahara, A. 2 140 dcyhl-ie are half-lives -decay 8 .S Jung, S. H. 18 − .Kameda, D. r 2 146 .S Ahn, S. D. r rcs [12–15]. process .Nishibata, H. poesnucle- -process I, 5 2 15, 8 10 2 2 2 8 2 the appearance of octupole collectivity. Here, new mea- Array (EURICA), which surrounded the WAS3ABi [19– surements are of particular value. The newly measured 21]. The particle identification plot was constructed by β-delayed half-lives provide an important experimental the TOF-Bρ-∆E principle with the measurements from data set to test the predictive ability of current theories. the detectors along the beam line of the BigRIPS sepa- In this paper, we present β-decay half-lives of 55 rator, including plastic scintillators, ionization chambers, neutron-rich nuclei beyond the N = 82 shell closure. Of as well as a variety of deflection magnets [22]. contam- these 55 nuclei, 13 are new with no data existing in the lit- inant events with -like charge states are well erature. The initial information on the nuclear structure separated from the fully-stripped isotope events, which in this region is investigated by comparing with different allow us to obtain the precise results employing both the theoretical models. The impact of these new half-lives on charge-state and fully-stripped events [17] (see Fig. 1). the calculated r-process abundances near the (A ≈ 130) peak is also explored. 103

102

Counts / 25 ms 10

1 2 3 4 Time (s)

FIG. 2. (color online). Time distribution of 142Te β- decay events fitted to the sum of activities of several com- ponents: parent nuclei (solid green line), daughter nuclei (solid magenta line), granddaughter nuclei (solid orange line), β-delayed daughter nuclei (dashed magenta line), β-delayed granddaughter nuclei (dashed orange line), as well as a con- stant background (solid blue line). FIG. 1. (color online). Particle identification of the nu- clides, and the well separated hydrogen-like charge state (A−3Z(Z−1)+) events accompanied closely on the left side of the fully-stripped (AZZ+) isotopes as illustrated in the figure [17]. The isotopes included by the green shaded area were already measured in previous experiments. The nuclei tagged by red circles are the most exotic isotopes measured in this The β-decay half-life of each isotope was extracted by experiment for each element. fitting its β-decay curve considering the time difference between the position-correlated implanted ions and its β decays [24, 43–45]. The fitting employed two major tech- niques: the least-squared and unbinned maximum likeli- The exotic neutron-rich isotopes around 140Te were hood methods. Both include the contributions from the produced at the Radioactive Isotope Beam Factory decays of daughter and granddaughter nuclei, β-delayed (RIBF), employing a primary beam of 238U with an en- daughter and granddaughter nuclei, as well as a constant ergy of 345 MeV/u and an intensity of 5 pnA. After bom- background. An example of the decay curve fitting for barding a target of 9Be with a thickness of 2.92 mm, the 142Te is given in Fig. 2. The half-lives of descendant nu- projectile fission fragments were selected and identified clei used in the fitting were measured in this experiment by the large-acceptance BigRIPS separator. The nuclei or taken from the literature [23]. The β-delayed neutron of interest were implanted in the beta counting system emission probabilities (Pn) were obtained from literature of the Wide range Active -Strip Stopper Array for values [23] if they were known, otherwise they were re- Beta and ion detection (WAS3ABi) with a rate of about garded as free parameters with a range between zero and 100 pps [18]. The WAS3ABi includes a stack of five Dou- one. The main source of uncertainty comes from the sta- ble Sided Silicon Strip Detectors (DSSSDs) with 1 mm tistical error, while the uncertainty from descendant nu- both for the width of each strip and the thickness of clei and Pn values were included as the systematic error. each DSSSD. The prompt and β-delayed γ rays emitted If enough statistics were collected, the obtained half-life from the implanted isotopes were detected by the 84 ger- was confirmed by fitting a decay curve which was gated manium cluster detectors of the Euroball RIken Cluster on the β-delayed γ rays. In this region, it is possible for 3

TABLE I. β-decay half-lives measured in this work compared with literature values, when available. The half-lives of 140Sb and 140Te were recently published based on the dataset from the same experiment, with the values of 173 ± 12 [41] and 350 ± 5 [42], respectively. The reason for small discrepancies probably comes from the background which the previous measurements didn’t subtract while gating on the β-delayed γ rays. The newly measured half-life of 139Sb has a large discrepancy compared with the previous measurement, probably because the old measurement suffers from the large background level in the decay curve [26]. The nuclei with the half-lives confirmed by the method of gating the β-delayed γ rays are tagged with an asterisk (*).

exp lit exp lit Nucleus T1/2 (ms) T1/2 (ms) Nucleus T1/2 (ms) T1/2 (ms) ∗ 134Sn 1070 ± 270 1050 ± 11 [23] 145I 89.7 ± 9.3 ... 135Sn 510 ± 270 530 ± 20 [23] 146I 94 ± 26 ... 136Sn 369 ± 76 290 ± 20 [23] 142Xe 1260 ± 70 1230 ± 20 [23] ∗ 137Sn 204 ± 12 230 ± 30 [24] 143Xe 519 ± 86 511 ± 6 [32] 138 ± +30 144 ∗ ± ± Sn 158 15 140−20 [24] Xe 391 52 388 7 [29] ∗ 139Sn 114 ± 49 130 ± 60 [24] 145Xe 202 ± 26 188 ± 4 [32] ∗ ∗ 134Sb 730 ± 110 780 ± 60 [23] 146Xe 147 ± 13 146 ± 6 [32] 135 ∗ ± ± 147 ∗ ± +100 Sb 1570 230 1679 15 [23] Xe 88 14 100−50 [32] ∗ 136Sb 957 ± 79 923 ± 14 [25] 148Xe 85 ± 15 ... ∗ ∗ 137Sb 566 ± 52 492 ± 25 [26] 145Cs 612 ± 20 587 ± 5 [23] ∗ ∗ 138Sb 326 ± 8 348 ± 15 [23] 146Cs 318 ± 18 322.0 ± 1.3 [23] 139 ∗ ± +14 147 ∗ ± ± Sb 182 9 93−3 [26] Cs 225 5 230 1 [23] 140Sb∗ 169 ± 7 ... 148Cs∗ 144 ± 9 146 ± 6 [23] ∗ 141Sb 103 ± 29 ... 149Cs 113 ± 6 113 ± 8 [33] 142 +69 150 ± ± Sb 53−31 ... Cs 90 15 84.4 8.2 [33] 137Te 2080 ± 400 2490 ± 50 [27] 151Cs 48 ± 28 69 ± 26 [33] 138Te 1500 ± 320 1400 ± 400 [28] 148Ba 602 ± 46 612 ± 17 [23] 139Te∗ 724 ± 81 ... 149Ba 368 ± 19 344 ± 7 [23] ∗ 140Te 360 ± 21 ... 150Ba 245 ± 16 259 ± 5 [33] ∗ 141Te 193 ± 16 ... 151Ba 166 ± 11 167 ± 5 [33] 142Te∗ 147 ± 8 ... 152Ba 148 ± 21 139 ± 8 [33] 143Te 120 ± 8 ... 153Ba 109 ± 59 116 ± 52 [33] 144 ± 151 ± +30 Te 93 60 ... La 510 330 457−18 [33] 140 ∗ ± ± 152 ± +6 I 553 46 860 40 [29] La 270 100 298−23 [33] ∗ 141I 418 ± 8 430 ± 20 [30] 153La 210 ± 120 245 ± 18 [33] 142I∗ 235 ± 11 222 ± 12 [31] 154La 221 ± 89 161 ± 15 [33] ∗ 143I 182 ± 8 130 ± 45 [31] 155La 94 ± 59 101 ± 28 [33] ∗ 144I 94 ± 8 ...

the β decay to be populated by the long-lived isomeric literature values [23–33] and five theoretical predic- states. The isomers were identified by analyzing the β- tions: finite-range droplet-model FRDM-1995 mass for- decay schemes in detail when there were enough statis- mula [46] with quasi-particle-random-phase approxima- tics. The half-lives of ground-state decays were extracted tion (QRPA) (2003) [34] as well as the new ver- by gating on the β-delayed gamma-rays only populated sion (2019) [35] with FRDM-2012 masses [47], Koura- from the ground states, such as 134Sb, 140I in this region. Tachibana-Uno-Yamada (KTUY) with the second gener- In this case, a large isomeric ratio and high statistics were ation of β-decay gross theory (GT2) [36, 37], Relativistic necessary to disentangle the β-decays from the ground Hartree-Bogoliubov (RHB) with the proton-neutron Rel- and isomeric states. The detailed information will be ativistic quasiparticle random phase approximation (pn- published in a forthcoming publication. RQRPA) [38], and the energy density functional (DF) with continuum quasi-particle random-phase approxima- The measured half-lives are reported in Table I to- tion (CQRPA) [39, 40]. gether with previous measurements, if available. The systematic trends of β-decay half-lives for exotic iso- The comparison (Fig. 3) indicates that the current the- topes of elements from 50Sn to 57La are shown in oretical models are unable to fully reproduce the exper- Fig. 3. The experimental results are compared with imental results in general up to a factor of ten in this 4

4 4 10 10 FRDM+QRPA (2003) FRDM+QRPA (2019) KTUY+GT2 RHB+pn-RQRPA 103 10 50Sn 51Sb 52Te 103 103

exp 1 2 10 2 2 10 10 /T cal 10 10 10 T M (old) = 1.77 -1 r1 M (old) = 1.13 Mr1 (old) = 0.82 10

Half-life (ms) r1 10 10 Mr1 (old) = 0.41 10 10 σ (old) = 1.85 σ 10 (old) = 2.13 σ 10 (old) = 1.81 r1 r1 r1 σ 10 (old) = 1.82 10 10 10 r1 Mr1 (new) = 1.15 M (new) = 0.60 M (new) = 0.68 10 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 82 84 86 88 90 92 r1 r1 M (new) = 0.34 82 84 86 88 90 σ 10 (new) = 2.09 10 10 r1 r1 σr (new) = 1.61 σ (new) = 1.52 10 1 r1 σr (new) = 1.43 10 -2 1 10 2 10 3 10 2 10 3 10 2 10 3 10 2 10 3 103 T exp (ms) T exp (ms) T exp (ms) T exp (ms) 53I 54Xe 55Cs 103 3 10 FRDM+QRPA (2003) 10 FRDM+QRPA (2019) KTUY+GT2 RHB+pn-RQRPA 102 102 102

exp 1 Half-life (ms) /T cal T 84 86 88 90 92 94 86 88 90 92 94 88 90 92 94 96 10 -1

3 103 10 56Ba 57 La This Work -2 Previous 10 85 90 95 85 90 95 85 90 95 85 90 95 FRDM+QRPA(2003) Neutron number N Neutron number N Neutron number N Neutron number N FRDM+QRPA(2019) 102 KTUY+GT2 102 RHB+pn-RQRPA

Half-life (ms) DF+CQRPA FIG. 4. (color online). Ratio between theoretical cal-

90 92 94 96 98 92 94 96 98 100 culations and measured half-lives plotted versus experi- Number of neutrons N mental half-life and neutron number for the four models: FRDM+QRPA(2003) [34] (brown), FRDM+QRPA(2019) FIG. 3. (color online). Systematic trends of the β-decay [35] (green), KTUY+GT2 [36, 37] (red), and RHB+pn- half-lives from this work (solid circles) and from previ- RQRPA [38] (blue), with the previous measurements (empty ous measurements (open triangles) [23–33]. The measure- dots) and 13 newly-measured half-lives (solid dots). ments are compared to predictions of five theoretical models: FRDM+QRPA(2003) [34] (brown), FRDM+QRPA(2019) [35] (green), KTUY+GT2 [36, 37] (red), RHB+pn-RQRPA [38] (blue), and DF+CQRPA [39, 40] (magenta). inaccuracies. Although the two FRDM+QRPA calcu- lations are based on detailed calculated single-particle spectra, they are less accurate close to N = 82, which region. The global nature of the KTUY+GT2 calcula- may be related to the difficulty of describing transition tion typically does better for the neutron-rich isotopes of regions between spherical and well-deformed nuclei. All elements beyond the Z = 50 shell gap (see 53I, 54Xe, models become more accurate further from stability, be- 55Cs, 56Ba, 57La). However, it cannot reproduce the cause of the large Qβ the half-lives are less sensitive to data for the nearly spherical nuclei close to the shell small inaccuracies in level structure (see Ref. [35] for gap since non-GT transitions contribute, for example a an in-depth discussion). A more quantitative compar- first forbidden decay νf7/2 ⇒ πg9/2 in N > 82 nuclei ison was carried out by calculating the ratio between near the doubly-magic nuclei 132Sn [24]. The system- theoretical predictions and experimental results as func- atic trends of β-decay half-lives in the rare-earth region tions of experimental half-lives and neutron number N have been well understood based on the FRDM+QRPA (see Fig. 4). In terms of quantitative analysis [47], 10 Mr1 calculation [33]. However, in this region, it shows rela- the mean deviation Mr1 = 10 and mean fluctua- 10 σr1 tively large odd-even staggering caused by the nucleon tion σr1 = 10 have been evaluated for the previous pairing effect, and tends to show an overestimation when measurements and newly-measured data in this work, n i approaching 50Sn. The use of FRDM-2012 masses does with r = Texp/Tcal, r1 = log10(r), Mr1 = 1/n Pi=1 r1, n i − 2 1/2 improve the agreement in this region especially for 50Sn, σr1 = (1/n Pi=1(r1 Mr1) ) . The deviations can 51Sb and 52Te (see green curve Fig. 3). The RHB+pn- be up to one-order of magnitude. The Mean Devia- 10 10 QRPA does not reproduce any structure-related features tion Mr1 and Mean Fluctuation σr1 of the four theoret- including the odd-even staggering, and generally under- ical predictions have been evaluated including both pre- estimates the experimental half-lives. One reason for the vious measurements and the newly-measured half-lives. discrepancy is that the Qβ values in this calculation do For newly-measured half-lives, the FRDM+QRPA (2003) 10 10 not include pairing effects. The DF+CQRPA are only has a Mr1 value of 1.15, and a σr1 value of 2.09 which applicable for nearly spherical nuclei, so they fit well the is similar to what was obtained for known nuclei [35]. half-life trends of 50Sn and 51Sb, which are close to the The FRDM+QRPA (2019) and KTUY+GT2 have simi- 132 10 10 doubly-magic nucleus 50 Sn. lar vales of Mr1 and σr1 indicating similar predictive ac- The KTUY+GT2 and RHB+pn-RQRPA, systemati- curacy in this region. The RHB+pn-QRPA substantially cally underestimate the half-lives but agree better for and systematically underestimates the experimental val- 10 more neutron-rich nuclei further from stability, because ues with a Mr1 value of 0.34, as is also evident from the for large Qβ half-lives are less affected by level-structure figures. 5

(a) Ground State (the 45th neutron level (3/2!))

(b) Ground State (the 46th neutron level (5/2!))

FIG. 5. Gamow-Teller strength functions in the daugh- ter states following β-decay of 141Te calculated by the FRDM+QRPA(2019) model, based on the odd particle lo- cated in level 45 (a) and level 46 (b). The thin vertical arrow indicates the Qβ value, the slightly thicker arrow indicates the neutron separation energy.

Although the FRDM+QRPA (2019) has more consis- tent predictions than other models it exhibits large odd- even staggering in contrast to the experiment. Pairing effects are expected to give rise to substantial odd-even staggering, but specifics of the nuclear level structure can FIG. 6. (color online) The calculated r-process abundance with (red) and without (blue) the 13 newly-measured half- modify this expected general behavior [35]. The calcu- lives, by employing the five distinct astrophysical trajecto- lated half-lives of the 52Te isotopes with even neutron ries ((1) Low Entropy (s ≈ 50), Initial Electron Fraction number agree well with experiment, but the odd-N nuclei (Ye=0.27). [48] (2) High Entropy (s ≈ 200), Initial Electron are underestimated. One possibility is that the calculated Fraction (Ye = 0.3). [49] (3) Low Entropy (s ≈ 30), Initial order of levels is not completely correct. We have inves- Electron Fraction (artificially reduced to produce a main r- tigated the effect of a small change in level order. Fig. 5 process, A>120). [50] (4) Low Entropy (s ≈ 10), Initial Elec- 141 shows the calculated half-lives of Te89 with two dif- tron Fraction (Ye = 0.05), with fission recycling. [51] (5) Low ≈ ferent odd-neutron configurations. When the position of Entropy (s 10), Initial Electron Fraction (Ye=0.19). [48]) the odd neutron, expected to be level 45 with - The experimental data were input if they are known, other- 3/2−, is changed to the 46th neutron level with spin and wise the theoretical properties were employed (Nuclear Mass parity of 5/2−, the calculated half-life is much larger and (FRDM-2012 [47]) + T1/2 and Pn (FRDM+QRPA (2019) [35]) + (n,γ) rates (calculated based on FRDM-2012 [47]))The more consistent with the experimental value. This means black points represent the solar r-process abundance. [52] that in the actual 141Te the positions of these levels may be inverted with respect to the calculated ones. The change in spin/parity of the odd particle obviously to different transition strengths and energies resulting in network [53] which supports unique control over nuclear the longer calculated half-life we obtain, see Fig. 5. A physics inputs allowing for the variation of mass models, more complete discussion of this type of issues are in half-lives and fission properties [54]. Network calcula- Ref. [35]. tions were performed using a range of five distinct condi- The impact of the measured half-lives on r-process tions that could occur in an astrophysical environment abundances is explored using the PRISM (Portable Rou- to produce a full abundance pattern out to the third tines for Integrated nucleoSynthesis Modeling) reaction peak. Nuclear properties including nuclear masses, β- 6 decay half-lives, neutron-capture rates in our network that the order of orbitals, which is sensitive to the nu- calculations, are predicted based on FRDM-2012 [47]. clear deformation in the transition region, have a large Experimental and evaluated data are used when avail- impact on the calculated half-lives. The r-process cal- able. In general, β decay rates, λβ , influence r-process culations here do not fully reproduce all the peaks in abundances Y along the r-process path through the the r-process abundance pattern. A more comprehensive steady beta-flow condition (λβ(Z, Apath)Y (Z, Apath) ≈ understanding of the r-process and its astrophysical sites constant) in the early stage, and during the decay back are still the goal we are continuing to pursue. Future to stability in the late stages, while β decay competes studies which probe more exotic neutron-rich nuclei will with neutron capture, see e.g. Ref. [55] and references aid in this endeavor. therein. The presently measured nuclei operate during This work was carried out at the RIBF operated by the second phase, as the r-process path proceeds back RIKEN Nishina Center, RIKEN, CNS, University of to stability. Figure 6 shows the difference of calculated Tokyo. The authors acknowledge discussion with Dr. r-process abundances with and without inclusion of the Calem Hoffman (ANL). We also acknowledge the EU- thirteen newly-measured half-lives of this work. This fig- ROBALL Owners Committee for the loan of ure demonstrates the important regional influence of our detectors and the PreSpec Collaboration for the read- newly measured half-lives compared to the baseline theo- out electronics of the cluster detectors. Part of the retical predictions. A quantitative discussion of improve- WAS3ABi was supported by the Rare Isotope Science ment to the solar isotopic pattern is not clear due to the Project which is funded by the Ministry of Education, variation seen in this region among differing astrophysical Science, and Technology (MEST) and National Research conditions. Instead, we report the average impact factor, Foundation (NRF) of Korea (2013M7A1A1075764). This Favg ∼ 4.86, and its standard deviation, σ(F ) ≈ 1.22, work was supported by the U.S. Department of En- for the five astrophysical trajectories. The impact fac- ergy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, at Ar- tor of this value indicates a strong local dependence on gonne National Laboratory under Contract No. DE- the final abundances [49]. For some of the trajectories, AC02-06CH11357, KAKENHI (Grants No. 25247045, (1), (2), and (4), a tiny global effect up to the A ≈ 195 r- 17H06090), the RIKEN Foreign Research Program, the process peak is observed owing to material that is cleared Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacin (Contracts No. out from the second r-process peak [35, 47]. We also note FPA2009-13377-C02 and No. FPA2011-29854-C04), the that conditions with fission recycling do not qualitatively UK Science and Technology Facilities Council, the Na- change this conclusion, as indicated by trajectory (5) in tional Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean Fig. 6. Government (Grants No. NRF-2009-0093817, No. NRF- In summary, our decay measurement campaign has 2015R1D1A1A01056918, No. NRF-2016R1A5A1013277 reached the furthest from the stability line, now beyond and No. NRF-2013R1A1A2063017), and the Hungarian N = 82 shell gap. The newly measured half-lives were Scientific Research Fund OTKA Contract No. K100835. found to have an important local impact on the abun- M.R. Mumpower carried out this work under the aus- dances of the second (A ≈130) r-process peak. The com- pices of the National Nuclear Security Administration of parison with measured half-lives illustrates the perfor- the U.S. Department of Energy at Los Alamos National mance of various theoretical predictions, and indicates Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396.

[1] E. M. Burbidge, G. R. Burbidge, W. A. Fowler, and Astrophys. J. 431, 742 (1994). F. Hoyle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 547 (1957). [11] S. Rosswog, M. Liebend¨orfer, F.-K. Thielemann, M. B. [2] S. E. Woosley, J. R. Wilson, G. J. Mathews, R. D. Hoff- Davies, W. Benz, and T. Piran, Astronomy and Astro- man, and B. S. Meyer, Astrophys. J. 433, 229 (1994). physics 341, 499 (1999). [3] K. Takahashi, J. Witti, and H.-T. Janka, Astronomy and [12] B. P. Abbott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017). Astrophysics 286, 857 (1994). [13] M. R. Drout et al., Science 358, 1570 (2017). [4] Y.-Z. Qian and S. E. Woosley, [14] E. Pian et al., Nature (London) 551, 67 (2017). Astrophys. J. 471, 331 (1996). [15] K. Hotokezaka, P. Beniamini, and T. Piran, (2018). [5] S. E. Woosley and R. D. Hoffman, [16] A. Frebel, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 68, 237 (2018), Astrophys. J. 395, 202 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021141. [6] J. M. Lattimer and D. N. Schramm, [17] Y. Shimizu et al., Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 87, 014203 (2018), Astrophys. J. 192, L145 (1974). https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.87.014203. [7] J. M. Lattimer, Black hole: Neutron star binary systems, [18] S. Nishimura et al., RIKEN Accel. Prog. Rep. 46, 182 Ph.D. thesis, Texas Univ., Austin. (1976). (2013). [8] E. Symbalisty and D. N. Schramm, Astrophys. Lett. 22, [19] S. Nishimura, Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics 2012, 03C006 (2012). 143 (1982). [20] P.-A. S¨oderstr¨om et al., [9] D. Eichler, M. Livio, T. Piran, and D. N. Schramm, Nucl. Inst. Meth. B 317, 649 (2013). Nature (London) 340, 126 (1989). [21] J. Wu et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 1594, 388 (2014). [10] M. B. Davies, W. Benz, T. Piran, and F. K. Thielemann, [22]N. Fukuda, T. Kubo, T. Ohnishi, N. In- 7

abe, H. Takeda, D. Kameda, and H. Suzuki, [39] I. N. Borzov, Physics of Atomic Nuclei 79, 910 (2016). Nucl. Inst. Meth. B 317, 323 (2013). [40] I. N. Borzov, J. J. Cuenca-Garc´ıa, K. Lan- [23] National Nuclear Data Center. ganke, G. Mart´ınez-Pinedo, and F. Montes, [24] G. Lorusso et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 192501 (2015). Nucl. Phys. A 814, 159 (2008). [25] G. Rudstam, K. Aleklett, and L. Sihver, [41] B. Moon et al., Phys. Rev. C 95, 044322 (2017). Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 53, 1 (1993). [42] B. Moon et al., Phys. Rev. C 96, 014325 (2017). [26] O. Arndt, K.-L. Kratz, W. B. Walters, K. Farouqi, [43] Z. Y. Xu, Beta-decay spectroscopy on neutron-rich nuclei U. K¨oster, V. Fedosseev, S. Hennrich, C. J. Jost, in a range of Z=26–32, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Tokyo. A. W¨ohr, A. A. Hecht, B. Pfeiffer, J. Shergur, and (2014). N. Hoteling, Phys. Rev. C 84, 061307 (2011). [44] S. Nishimura et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 052502 (2011). [27] M. Samri, G. J. Costa, G. Klotz, D. Magnac, R. Seltz, [45] Z. Y. Xu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 032505 (2014). and J. P. Zirnheld, Z.Phys. A321, 255 (1985). [46] P. M¨oller, J. R. Nix, W. D. Myers, and W. J. Swiatecki, [28] M. Asghar, J. Gautheron, G. Bailleul, J. Bocquet, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 59, 185 (1995). J. Greif, H. Schrader, G. Siegert, C. Ristori, J. Crancon, [47] P. M¨oller, A. J. Sierk, T. Ichikawa, and H. Sagawa, and G. Crawford, Nuclear Physics A 247, 359 (1975). Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 109-110, 1 (2016). [29] H. Ahrens, P. Patzelt, and G. Herrmann, [48] E. M. Holmbeck, R. Surman, T. M. Sprouse, M. R. Journal of Inorganic and Nuclear Chemistry 38, 191 (1976). Mumpower, N. Vassh, T. C. Beers, and T. Kawano, [30] K. Aleklett, P. Hoff, E. Lund, and G. Rudstam, Z.Phys. American Astronomical Society 870, 23 (2018). A295, 331 (1980). [49] M. R. Mumpower, R. Surman, G. C. [31] R. Kessler, K. L. Kratz, J. Pereira Conca, H. Schatz, McLaughlin, and A. Aprahamian, and the E040 Collaboration, β-decay properties of nuclei Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 86, 86 (2016), in the region around 132Sn, Tech. Rep. GSI 2006-1,P154 arXiv:1508.07352 [nucl-th]. (2006). [50] Arcones, A. and Janka, H.-Th., A&A 526, A160 (2011). [32] U. C. Bergmann et al., [51] S. Goriely, A. Bauswein, and H.- Nuclear Physics A 714, 21 (2003). T. Janka, Astrophys. J. 738, L32 (2011), [33] J. Wu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 072701 (2017). arXiv:1107.0899 [astro-ph.SR]. [34] P. M¨oller, B. Pfeiffer, and K.-L. Kratz, [52] S. Goriely, Astron. Astrophys. 342, 881 (1999). Phys. Rev. C 67, 055802 (2003). [53] M. R. Mumpower, T. Kawano, J. L. [35] P. M¨oller, M. R. Mumpower, T. Kawano, and W. D. Ullmann, M. Krtiˇcka, and T. M. Myers, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 125, 1 Sprouse, Phys. Rev. C 96, 024612 (2017), (2018). arXiv:1706.07504 [nucl-th]. [36] H. Koura, T. Tachibana, M. Uno, and M. Yamada, [54] B. Cˆot´e, C. L. Fryer, K. Belczynski, O. Korobkin, Progress of Theoretical Physics 113, 305 (2005). M. Chru´sli´nska, N. Vassh, M. R. Mumpower, J. Lip- [37] T. Tachibana, M. Yamada, and Y. Yoshida, puner, T. M. Sprouse, R. Surman, and R. Wollaeger, Progress of Theoretical Physics 84, 641 (1990). Astrophys. J. 855, 99 (2018), arXiv:1710.05875. [38] T. Marketin, L. Huther, and G. Mart´ınez-Pinedo, [55] M. Mumpower, J. Cass, G. Passucci, R. Surman, and Phys. Rev. C 93, 025805 (2016). A. Aprahamian, AIP Advances 4, 041009 (2014).