The Effects of Introduced Trout on Native
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE EFFECTS OF INTRODUCED TROUT ON NATIVE MACROINVERTEBRATES FROM LAKES IN THE TRINITY ALPS WILDERNESS IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA By Erin Colleen Hannelly A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Masters of Arts In Biology May 2009 ABSTRACT THE EFFECTS OF INTRODUCED TROUT ON NATIVE MACROINVERTEBRATES FROM LAKES IN THE TRINITY ALPS WILDERNESS IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Erin Colleen Hannelly I examined differences in native macroinvertebrates among four lake management categories (fish stocked, temporary stocking suspension, fish removal lakes, and historically fishless lakes) and among three habitats (rock, organic/silt substrate, and emergent vegetation) from 16 different lake basins in a four-year study (2003-2006) in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northeastern California. This study showed that introduced insectivorous fish reduce the diversity of native aquatic insects. Chironomid midges were more abundant and in greater proportion in fish lakes than in fishless lakes. Additionally, more taxa were sampled each subsequent year following fish removals and more taxa were sampled from Hidden Lake, a stocking suspension lake that did not maintain a fish population, than in the other three stocking suspension lakes that did sustain viable fish populations. The reduction in insect diversity due to fish was further exemplified in Hidden Lake alone, where more taxa were recorded each subsequent year of the study. Libellula, a stout-bodied predaceous dragonfly, was most common in fish stocked lakes. The life history and morphology of Libellula (Odonata: Libellulidae) seems to give them an advantage over other invertebrate predators in fish lakes. Fish create top- iii down effects that are illustrated by the apparent ability of Libellula to regulate other insect abundances and proportions. This study also demonstrated how large-bodied insects are more commonly found in complex habitats, which may be attributable to increased habitat availability and resources, to the invertebrates seeking refugia from insectivorous fish, or to a combination of both. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would to thank Dr. Karen Pope who has been a wonderful mentor to me throughout graduate school. Thank you for giving me the opportunity to work on such an inspiring project! Thank you to my committee members Dr. Kristine Brenneman and Dr. Peggy Wilzbach for your advice and your input on this manuscript. Thank you to my advisor, Dr. Michael Camann, for help with the identifications of some tricky beetles and endless statistical analysis. Thanks to Cynthia Werner for help with formatting. Also thanks to my parents for the occasional Hannelly Family Grant! Thanks to my friends Arin Yoon, Andy Zaleski, Garrit Craig, Mazie Cheseby, Greg Ciannella, and the Woods boys for your support. Thanks for the Woolford-Hegy Rotary scholarship and the Special Forces Association grant. And lastly, thanks to the biology community; it is refreshing and exciting to always have something fun and important to talk about. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ v TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... viii INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 METHODS ......................................................................................................................... 6 Study Sites .......................................................................................................... 7 Sampling Design ................................................................................................. 7 Data Analysis ...................................................................................................... 8 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 11 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................... 21 Recommendations ............................................................................................. 28 LITERATURE CITED ..................................................................................................... 58 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Macroinvertebrate taxa sampled from 16 subalpine lakes in four fisheries management categories in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. * indicates 5 individuals or less. ........................................................ 29 2. Macroinvertebrate taxa sampled from four fish removal lakes in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. * indicates 5 individuals or less. .......... 32 3. Macroinvertebrate taxa sampled from three habitats in 16 different subalpine lakes in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. * indicates 5 individuals or less. ................................................................................................ 34 4. Physical attributes averaged between the four blocks and mean post-treatment macroinvertebrate abundance with standard error in a landscape-scale manipulative study in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. ......... 36 5. Physical attributes averaged between the four lake management categories and mean post-treatment macroinvertebrate abundance with standard error in a landscape-scale manipulative study in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. ........................................................................ 37 6. Macroinvertebrate taxa sampled from four fish stocking suspension lakes in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. * indicates 5 individuals or less. ................................................................................................ 38 7. Macroinvertebrate taxa recovered from Hidden Lake in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. * indicates 5 individuals or less. .................. 40 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Map showing the study site and blocking of 16 subalpine lakes in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. ................................................... 41 2. Ordination grouped by treatment of all post-treatment macroinvertebrate samples from 16 subalpine lakes in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in Northern California. Variable codes are the following: HYD12 – Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera), HYG21 - Hygrotus (Coloptera: Dyticidae), UVA25 – Uvarus (Coleoptera: Dyticidae), CEL27 – Celina (Coleoptera: Dyticidae), LIL42 – Libellula (Odonata: Libellulidae), LIM55 – Limnephilidae (Trichoptera), LEN56 – Lenarchus (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae), rich – taxa richness, div- diversity, even- macroinvertebrate community evenness, dom3 – dominant three taxa from all samples, mx. depth – maximum depth, degd – degree days, veg. cov – vegetation cover, wood – woody debris, cpue – catch per unit effort. .................................................................................. 42 3. Total abundance of all post-treatment macroinvertebrates samples from 16 lakes in 4 fisheries management categories in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. ........................................................................................... 43 4. Mean post-treatment abundance (± 1 S.E.) of macroinvertebrates from 16 subalpine lakes in 4 fisheries management categories from the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. ........................................................................ 44 5. Mean post-treatment abundance of Libellula (Odonata: Libellulidae) (± 1 S.E.) from 16 subalpine lakes in 4 fisheries management categories in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. ......................................... 45 6. Mean macroinvertebrate abundance (± 1 S.E.) from 4 fish removal lakes in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. Fish were removed after 2003 data were collected. ............................................................................. 46 7. Mean abundance of Libellula (Odonata: Libellulidae) (± 1 S.E.) in four fish removal lakes in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in Northern Californa. Fish were removed after 2003 data were collected. .............................................. 47 8. Mean proportion of Libellula (Odonata: Libellulidae) (± 1 S.E.) to other invertebrate predators from four fish removal lakes in the Trinity Alps viii Wilderness in Northern California. Fish were removed after 2003 data were collected. ............................................................................................... 48 9. Mean proportion of Libellula (Odonata: Libellulidae) (± 1 S.E.) to other invertebrate predators from 16 subalpine lakes in four fisheries management categories in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. ........................ 49 10. Mean abundance of macroinvertebrates (± 1 S.E.) collected from three habitats in 16 subalpine lakes in the Trinity Alps Wilderness in northern California. ..........................................................................................