DOCSLIB.ORG

Accidents and Incidents 2020 Prakash Elamakkara/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Elamakkara/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Prakash

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Accidents and Incidents 2020 Prakash Elamakkara/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Elamakkara/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Prakash Safety 2020 Accidents and incidents 2020 Prakash Elamakkara/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Elamakkara/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Prakash Air India Express 737-800 crash at Kozhikode-Calicut killed 21 We record the major safety events of the past year – both fatal and non-fatal – that have aff ected airline operations around the world ❱ February 2021 Flight International 45 ❱ Fatal accidents: Scheduled passenger flights Date: 8 Jan ● Carrier: Ukraine International Airlines ● Aircraft type/registration: Boeing 737-800 (UR-PSR) Location: Near Tehran Khomeini airport, Iran ● Fatalities (crew/pax): 9/167 ● Total occupants (crew/pax): 9/167 ● Phase: C Bound for Kiev, Ukraine, on a scheduled flight, the aircraft took off from of track, but then the primary return also disappeared. Speculation runway 29R at Tehran’s Khomeini airport, contacted Mehrabad radar about a mistaken missile shoot-down began rapidy, because of military and was cleared to 26,000ft, to turn right for waypoint PAROT after tension in Iran and the fact that, a few hours before the Ukrainian 737’s passing 6,000ft. Mehrabad noticed that, passing 8,100ft, the secondary departure, Iranian missiles had targeted US bases in Iraq in retaliation surveillance radar data block for the aircraft disappeared from its for the assassination of Iranian general Qasem Soleimani by a US drone display. Mehrabad could still see it on primary radar well to the right strike on 3 January. Tehran admitted responsibility on 11 July. Date: 5 Feb ● Carrier: Pegasus Airlines ● Aircraft type/registration: Boeing 737-800 (TC-IZK) Location: Istanbul Sabiha Gokcen airport, Turkey ● Fatalities (crew/pax): 0/3 ● Total occupants (crew/pax): 6/177 ● Phase: L The aircraft, inbound from Izmir, was approaching runway 06 while The accident happened in darkness (18:19 local time) and in IMC with a thunderstorm was passing the airfield and the wind direction was strong gusting winds and rain associated with local thunderstorm changing rapidly. On final approach, the aircraft had a normal approach activity - wind 290°/22kt gusting to 37kt and variable between 240° airspeed but a tailwind component of about 20kt (37km/h), and it and 330°. Visibility was 3.8nm (7km) in rain. Runway 06 has a landing landed long and fast. The crew used autobrake and spoilers, and distance available of 3,000m with a 60m stopway. It is understood that applied reverse thrust manually, but the aircraft went over the runway runway 06 at Sabiha Gokcen is the preferred runway unless it is wet end, fell down a 30m (100ft) slope and broke into three sections. Three and the tailwind component exceeds 5kt. The aircraft was operating passengers died and most of those who survived were injured. flight PC2193. Date: 22 May ● Carrier: Pakistan International Airlines ● Aircraft type/registration: Airbus A320 (AP-BLD) Location: Near Karachi International airport, Pakistan ● Fatalities (crew/pax): 8/89 ● Total occupants (crew/pax): 8/91 ● Phase: RA The preliminary accident report says the departure from Lahore and Then, as the aircraft passed 1,750ft about 5nm from the runway, the cruise to Karachi were uneventful, but observes the crew did not crew raised the undercarriage and selected Flap 1 with the IAS at demonstrate good crew resource management and were talking 243kt, generating overspeed and EGPWS warnings. By then they had much of the time about the coronavirus pandemic. When they called more or less intercepted the glideslope, but were still travelling much for descent to Karachi, they were cleared for a Nawabshah 2A arrival too fast. Passing 500ft, the airspeed was still 220kt, flap setting 3, procedure and told to expect an ILS approach to runway 25L. ATC with a 2,000ft/min descent rate and warnings of ground proximity cleared the flight direct to MAKLI, a waypoint 15nm from the Karachi and “gear not down” were generated, but the crew proceeded to land. VOR on the 075 radial, cleared to descend to 10,000ft. On changing They were still in contact with Karachi Approach when they should frequency to Karachi Approach the flight was cleared to 3,000ft. have been talking to Tower. When the engine cowlings touched the The aircraft, however, arrived over MAKLI passing through 9,780ft runway the crew selected reverse thrust and – pointlessly – initiated with an indicated airspeed (IAS) of 245kt. The crew tripped out both braking. Tower advised Approach of the gear-up runway contact, while autopilots, extended the speedbrakes, and selected Open Descent the crew started a go-around procedure and told Approach that they mode. ATC could see on radar that the A320 was approximately lined wanted to position for another approach to 25L. The pilots were told to up with the localiser for 25L but was well above the ILS glidepath use 25L or R and to turn left heading 110° and to climb to 3,000ft. The and suggested they turn left heading 180° to lose height. The crew engines both began to fail and the crew declared a Mayday emergency. repeated that they were established on the ILS for 25L and did not Video subsequently shows the aircraft descending into a residential carry out the orbit, so ATC cleared them to land. The crew selected area with a very high nose attitude, its gear and ram air turbine gear down when 10.5nm from the runway, descending through 7,220ft. deployed. There were casualties among residents in the houses where ATC passed them more warnings about the aircraft’s excess height. the aircraft came down. Date: 7 Aug ● Carrier: Air India Express ● Aircraft type/registration: Boeing 737-800 (VT-AXH) Location: Kozhikode-Calicut airport, India ● Fatalities (crew/pax): 2/19 ● Total occupants (crew/pax): 6/184 ● Phase: L Inbound from Dubai, the crew approached Kozhikode-Calicut airport and the crew then flew another teardrop pattern, this time in order to from the west. They overflew the airport, which has a single runway approach runway 10, which gave them a tailwind. Indian investigators orientated 10/28 and is sited on a flattened hilltop, and then flew a report that touchdown was 900m into the 2,850m-long runway, and teardrop pattern in order to intercept the approach to runway 28. The the 737 overran. It passed through the 90m runway end safety area surface wind was 260°/13kt, there was scattered cloud at 300ft and, and continued down a 34m drop, where it broke up. Both pilots and 19 at 1,200ft, visibility of 1.1nm, and rain. This approach was abandoned, passengers were killed. Fatal accidents: Non-scheduled flights Date: 4 May ● Carrier: African Express Airways ● Aircraft type/registration: Embraer EMB-120 Brasilia (5Y-AXO) Location: Near Baardale airport, Somalia ● Fatalities (crew/pax): 6 ● Total occupants (crew/pax): 6 ● Phase: A The aircraft was shot down while it was approaching Bardaale, Somalia. admitted that its peacekeeping forces, stationed at Bardaale, had shot The incident happened in daylight (15:45 local time) and VMC. The down the aircraft. The Ethiopian soldiers “mistakenly believed the plane aircraft was operating a flight from Mogadishu via Baidoa with medical was on a potential suicide mission” as they had not been informed supplies. According to local press reports Ethiopia subsequently about the flight and the aircraft was flying low. Date: 5 Jul ● Carrier: Brooks Seaplane Service ● Aircraft type/registration: Viking DHC-2 Beaver (N2106K) Location: Harrison, Idaho, USA ● Fatalities (crew/pax): 1/5 ● Total occupants (crew/pax): 1/5 ● Phase: ER The floatplane collided with a Cessna TU206G (N6373U) over (14:22 local time) and in VMC. The DHC-2 Beaver was operating a Powderhorn Bay, about 2.7nm northwest of Harrison, Idaho. Both 20min local air tour from a seaplane base at the northern end of Lake aircraft subsequently went out of control and crashed into the waters of Coeur d’Alene. The Cessna pilot had departed Coeur d’Alene airport for the bay. The collision occurred at between 700ft and 800ft in daylight Lewiston, Idaho. Date: 31 Jul ● Carrier: High Adventure Air Charters ● Aircraft type/registration: Viking DHC-2 Beaver (N9482U) Location: Soldotna, Alaska ● Fatalities (crew/pax): ● 1/5 Total occupants (crew/pax): 1/5 ● Phase: ER The floatplane collided with a Piper PA-12 Super Cruiser (N2587M), from Longmere Lake, approximately 2.7m to the northeast. The aircraft which also crashed, killing the pilot. The Piper had taken off from collided about 1nm northeast of the airport in daylight (08:30 local Soldotna airport, while the float-equipped DHC-2 Beaver was operating time) and in VMC. 46 Flight International February 2021 Safety 2020 PIA-operated A320 crashed into residential area near Karachi Xinhua/Shutterstock Fatal accidents: Non-passenger operations Date: 17 Mar ● Carrier: Planemasters ● Aircraft type/registration: Cessna 208B (N247PM) Location: Near La Crosse, Kansas, USA ● Fatalities (crew/pax): 1 ● Total occupants (crew/pax): 1 ● Phase: C Making an ILS approach in poor visibility to runway 34 at Hays, and turned south while initiating a cleared climb to 7,000ft. Radar and inbound from Wichita Eisenhower airport in Kansas, the pilot carried automatic dependent surveillance – broadcast returns showed that out a go-around and then stated his intention to position for a second nearly 20min later, the aircraft entered a descending left turn, and less approach to 34. However, the visibility dropped even further during than 1min later crashed into the ground. Aircraft damage indicated that his positioning manoeuvre, and the ILS approach ended in another it was travelling at a very high speed, and had made an almost vertical go-around. The pilot stated that he would divert to Great Bend airport, dive to impact. Date: 7 Jun ● Carrier: McNeely Charter Service ● Aircraft type/registration: Mitsubishi MU-2 (N44MX) Location: Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA ● Fatalities (crew/pax): 1 ● Total occupants (crew/pax): 1 ● Phase: TO The aircraft crashed on take-off from runway 15 at Sioux Falls, South it rolled to the right and impacted the ground.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Preliminary Report
    National Transportation Safety Board Aviation Accident Preliminary Report Location: Cooper Landing, AK Accident Number: ANC20FA007 Date & Time: 11/29/2019, 1911 AKS Registration: N4087G Aircraft: Piper PA-31-350 Injuries: 3 Fatal Flight Conducted Under: Part 135: Air Taxi & Commuter - Non-scheduled - Air Medical (Medical Emergency) On November 29, 2019, about 1911 Alaska standard time, a Piper PA-31-350 airplane, N4087G, was destroyed by impact and postcrash fire when it collided with mountainous terrain about 15 miles west of Cooper Landing, Alaska. The three occupants; the airline transport pilot, a flight nurse, and the flight paramedic were fatally injured. The airplane was operated by Fly 4 You Inc., doing business as Security Aviation, as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 135 visual flight rules air ambulance flight. Dark night visual meteorological conditions existed at the departure and destination locations and company flight following procedures were in effect. The flight departed Ted Stevens International Airport (PANC), Anchorage, Alaska, about 1848, destined for Seward Airport (PAWD), Seward, Alaska. Dispatch records indicated that, on November 29, Providence Seward Medical Center emergency clinic personnel contacted multiple air ambulance companies with a "weather check" for possible air ambulance transportation of a patient from Seward to Anchorage. The first company contacted was Guardian Flight, who declined the flight at 1624 due to limited daylight hours. The second company, LifeMed Alaska, declined the flight at 1637 due to weather. The third and final company contacted for the flight was Medevac Alaska. Their dispatch officer was not notified of the previous declined flight requests and forwarded the request to Security Aviation, who is their sole air charter provider.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Standards Manual Summary of Changes
    October 2019 Visa Public gfgfghfghdfghdfghdfghfghffgfghfghdfghfg This document is a supplement of the Visa Core Rules and Visa Product and Service Rules. In the event of any conflict between any content in this document, any document referenced herein, any exhibit to this document, or any communications concerning this document, and any content in the Visa Core Rules and Visa Product and Service Rules, the Visa Core Rules and Visa Product and Service Rules shall govern and control. Merchant Data Standards Manual Summary of Changes Visa Merchant Data Standards Manual – Summary of Changes for this Edition This is a global document and should be used by members in all Visa Regions. In this edition, details have been added to the descriptions of the following MCCs in order to facilitate easier merchant designation and classification: • MCC 5541 Service Stations with or without Ancillary Services has been updated to include all engine fuel types, not just automotive • MCC 5542 Automated Fuel Dispensers has been updated to include all engine fuel types, not just automotive • MCC 5812 Eating Places, Restaurants & 5814 Fast Food Restaurants have been updated to include greater detail in order to facilitate easier segmentation • MCC 5967 Direct Marketing – Inbound Telemarketing Merchants has been updated to include adult content • MCC 6540 Non-Financial Institutions – Stored Value Card Purchase/Load has been updated to clarify that it does not apply to Staged Digital Wallet Operators (SDWO) • MCC 8398 Charitable Social Service Organizations has
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 25 Box 31/3 Airline Codes
    March 2021 APPENDIX 25 BOX 31/3 AIRLINE CODES The information in this document is provided as a guide only and is not professional advice, including legal advice. It should not be assumed that the guidance is comprehensive or that it provides a definitive answer in every case. Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 000 ANTONOV DESIGN BUREAU 001 AMERICAN AIRLINES 005 CONTINENTAL AIRLINES 006 DELTA AIR LINES 012 NORTHWEST AIRLINES 014 AIR CANADA 015 TRANS WORLD AIRLINES 016 UNITED AIRLINES 018 CANADIAN AIRLINES INT 020 LUFTHANSA 023 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. (CARGO) 027 ALASKA AIRLINES 029 LINEAS AER DEL CARIBE (CARGO) 034 MILLON AIR (CARGO) 037 USAIR 042 VARIG BRAZILIAN AIRLINES 043 DRAGONAIR 044 AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS 045 LAN-CHILE 046 LAV LINEA AERO VENEZOLANA 047 TAP AIR PORTUGAL 048 CYPRUS AIRWAYS 049 CRUZEIRO DO SUL 050 OLYMPIC AIRWAYS 051 LLOYD AEREO BOLIVIANO 053 AER LINGUS 055 ALITALIA 056 CYPRUS TURKISH AIRLINES 057 AIR FRANCE 058 INDIAN AIRLINES 060 FLIGHT WEST AIRLINES 061 AIR SEYCHELLES 062 DAN-AIR SERVICES 063 AIR CALEDONIE INTERNATIONAL 064 CSA CZECHOSLOVAK AIRLINES 065 SAUDI ARABIAN 066 NORONTAIR 067 AIR MOOREA 068 LAM-LINHAS AEREAS MOCAMBIQUE Page 2 of 19 Appendix 25 - SAD Box 31/3 Airline Codes March 2021 Airline code Code description 069 LAPA 070 SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES 071 ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES 072 GULF AIR 073 IRAQI AIRWAYS 074 KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES 075 IBERIA 076 MIDDLE EAST AIRLINES 077 EGYPTAIR 078 AERO CALIFORNIA 079 PHILIPPINE AIRLINES 080 LOT POLISH AIRLINES 081 QANTAS AIRWAYS
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 103-305—Aug
    PUBLIC LAW 103-305—AUG. 23, 1994 108 STAT. 1569 Public Law 103-305 103d Congress An Act To amend the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982 to authorize Aug. 23, 1994 appropriations for fiscal years 1994, 1995, and 1996, and for other purposes. [H.R. 2739] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Federal Aviation Administration SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Authorization (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the "Federal Avia- fg use 40101 tion Administration Authorization Act of 1994". note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.— Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definitions. Sec. 3. Amendment of title 49, United States Code. TITLE I—AIRPORT AND AIRWAY IMPROVEMENT Sec. 101. Airport improvement program. Sec. 102. Airway improvement program. Sec. 103. Operations of FAA. Sec. 104. Innovative technology policy. Sec. 105. Inclusion of explosive aetection devices and universal access systems. Sec. 106. Submission and approval of project grant applications. Sec. 107. Preventive mainteneince. Sec. 108. Repeal of general aviation airport project grant application approval. Sec. 109. Reports on impacts of new airport projects. Sec. 110. Airport fees policy. Sec. 111. Aiiport financial reports. Sec. 112. Additional enforcement against illegal diversion of airport revenue. Sec. 113. Resolution of airport-air carrier disputes concerning airport fees. Sec. 114. Terminal development. Sec. 115. Letters of intent. Sec. 116. Military airport program. Sec. 117. Terminal development costs. Sec. 118. Airport safety data collection. Sec. 119. Soundproofing and acquisition of certain residential buildings and prop­ erties.
    [Show full text]
  • LMD #09-45 EXCHANGE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, The
    LMD #09-45 EXCHANGE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Kenai Peninsula Borough and the City of Soldotna are owners of certain real property proposed to be resubdivided by the Soldotna Airport Property Funny River Road Realignment Addn preliminary plat; and WHEREAS, the objectives of the plat are to provide for the realignment of Funny River Road as well as facilitate a mutually beneficial cooperative land exchange between the City and Borough; and WHEREAS, the parties have designed the exchange to include lands of like equal area and value; and WHEREAS, the parties intend to finalize the plat and execute the land exchange in accordance with the schedule for road construction and right-of-way vacation; and NOW, THEREFORE, this Agreement is made on this ______ day of ______________ 2010, by and between the KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH, an Alaska municipal corporation, whose address is 144 North Binkley Street, Soldotna, Alaska 99669 (hereinafter referred to as "KPB"), pursuant to KPB Ordinance 2010-____ enacted February 16, 2010, and the City of Soldotna, an Alaska municipal corporation, whose address is 177 North Birch Street, Soldotna, AK 99669 (hereinafter referred to as “CITY OF SOLDOTNA”) pursuant to City of Soldotna Ordinance 2009-048 enacted January 13, 2010. 1. KPB PARCEL Subject to other applicable provisions of this Agreement, for good and valuable consideration, the KPB will convey all interest it has in the following described parcel of land (“KPB Property”) to CITY OF SOLDOTNA. The KPB makes no warranties, express or implied, nor assumes any liability whatsoever, regarding the social, economic, or environmental aspects of the KPB Property, including, without limitation, the soil conditions, water drainage, access, natural or artificial hazards that may exist, or the merchantability, profitability or fitness of the KPB Property for any particular purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Powerpoint Sunusu
    www.tdt.aero [email protected] You Fly We Care... Copyright© 2017 by TD Team. All rights reserved. Rev01 16.03.2017 Antalya Airport AYT Dalaman Airport DLM Bodrum Airport BJV Sabiha Gökçen Airport SAW İstanbul Atatürk Airport IST WHO WE ARE? Cam Rahn Airport CXR Tiran Airport TIA Dublin Airport DUB TD Team was founded in the year 2007. The company’s aim was to apply similar personnel contracting business model used in Europe. Our company provided technical personnel to support foreign operations in Nigeria, Russia and the United States of America and also during last 3 years operations in Turkey Civil air transport sector. We successfully performed subcontracted services for maintenance companies by renting contracted personnel for A/C painting, structural works, and cabin interior services under control of the quality management systems. TD Team personnel keeps providing fast, reliable and qualified subcontract services to its clients on technical support, painting, cabin interior and structural works. Copyright© 2017 by TD Team. All rights reserved. Rev01 16.03.2017 Antalya Airport AYT Dalaman Airport DLM Bodrum Airport BJV Sabiha Gökçen Airport SAW İstanbul Atatürk Airport IST WHO WE ARE ? Cam Rahn CXR Tiran TIA Dublin Airport DUB In the year 2012, TD Team has got its first approval as a SHY-145/JAR-145 certificate with an approval number TR.145.082 from Turkish Civil Aviation Authority (DGCA/SHGM) for Line Maintenance services. TD Team is authorised to provide technical services in Bodrum International TR.145.0082 Airport (BJV), Dalaman International Airport (DLM), Antalya International Airport (AYT), İstanbul Atatürk Airport (IST) and Sabiha Gökçen Airport (SAW), Cam Rahn (CXR), Tiran (TIA) and Dublin (DUB).
    [Show full text]
  • PRIVATIZATION of TURKISH AIRPORTS Tolga Ülkü Ph.D
    PRIVATIZATION OF TURKISH AIRPORTS Tolga Ülkü Ph.D. Student at Humboldt University [email protected] Draft: 23.07.2010, -Please do not distribute without the permission of the authors- ABSTRACT: Starting in 1993, the General Directorate of State Airports Authority (SAA) has partially privatized the major airport terminals in Turkey by using Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) methods. One of the main reasons for privatization was the necessity of investing in terminals, as passenger numbers increased dramatically in the last decade and terminal facilities were the initial bottleneck. In this way, the state was able to shift the burden of financing and operation to the private sector. The selection of airports, the particular form of privatization with a BOT method for terminals and later on the associated long term leases and their economic effects raise interesting research questions. Furthermore, a comparison of BOT method with other privatization methodologies gives an insight of advantages and drawbacks in the implementation. One question investigates if the SAA makes use of the previous experience on airport privatization in the world. The BOT implementations are evaluated in terms of capital investment funding, contractual design and the operation period acquired by the private sector via auctions. Moreover, the details of the Lease agreements following the expiration of BOT contracts at Istanbul Atatürk and Antalya airport are described to raise some questions on the contracts and the auctions took place. WWW.GAP-PROJEKT.DE _____________________________________________________________________ Prof. Dr. Hans-Martin Niemeier Prof. Dr. Jürgen Müller Prof. Dr. Hansjochen Ehmer Hochschule Bremen HWR Berlin Internationale Fachhochschule Bad Honnef Werderstr. 73 Badensche Str.
    [Show full text]
  • AFRAA Annual Report 2019
    IRLINES ASS A PAGNIES O OM AERI C 20N S C EN 19 E N I A D ES A N A T C IO F I T R I I O R IA C C A I N F O N S E S A S A ANNUAL AFRAA REPORT Amadeus Airline Platform Bringing SIMPLICITY to airlines You can follow us on: AmadeusITGroup amadeus.com/airlineplatform AFRAA Executive Committee (EXC) Members 2019 AIR MAURITIUS (MK) RWANDAIR (WB) PRESIDENT OF AFRAA CHAIRPERSON OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Mr. Somas Appavou Ms. Yvonne Makolo Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer CONGO AIRWAYS (8Z) KENYA AIRWAYS (KQ) CAMAIR-CO (QC) Mr. Desire Balazire Esono Mr. Sebastian Mikosz Mr. Louis Roger Njipendi Kouotou 1st Vice Chairman of the EXC 2nd Vice Chairman of the EXC Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer ROYAL AIR MAROC (AT) EGYPTAIR (MS) TUNISAIR (TU) Mr. Abdelhamid Addou Capt. Ahmed Adel Mr. Ilyes Mnakbi Chief Executive Officer Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer ETHIOPIAN AIRLINES (ET) AIR ZIMBABWE (UM) AIR NAMIBIA (SW) MAURITANIA AIRLINES (L6) Mr. Tewolde GebreMariam Mr. Joseph Makonise Mr. Xavier Masule Mrs. Amal Mint Maoulod Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer Chief Executive Officer ANNUAL REPORT 2019 I Foreword raffic growth in Africa has been consistently increasing since 2011. The demand for air passenger services remained strong in 2018 with a 6.9% year Ton year growth. Those good results were supported by the good global economic environment particularly in the first half of the year. Unlike passenger traffic, air freight demand recorded a very weak performance in 2018 compared to 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Tariffs for 2020
    TARIFFS FOR 2020 Tariff Name Page 1 Tariff For International Landing, Stopover, Lighting and Approaching 3 2 Tariff For Domestic Landing, Stopover, Lighting and Approaching 6 3 Tariff For Passenger Services 9 4 Tariff For Safety Precation 11 5 Tariff For Aircraft / Vehicles Marshalling 12 6 Tariff For Extension Of Airport Working Hours 14 7 Tariff For Passenger Boarding Bridge Services 15 8 Tariff For Ground Handling Services 17 9 Tariff For Refueling Concession 21 10 Tariff For Apron Vehicle Private Plate 22 11 Tariff For Entry Cards 25 12 Tariff For Communication Systems 28 13 Tariff For Communication System Allocation and Infrastructure Rights 30 14 Tariff For Power, Water, Sewerage, HVAC 32 15 Tariff For Tools, Equipment, Materials Allocation 36 16 Tariff For Terminal Area Allocation 39 17 Tariff For Land and Other Building Spaces Allocation 45 18 Tariff For Check-In, Transit Counters, Kiosk and Information Desks 47 19 Tariff For Flight Information Display System Usage 50 20 Tariff For Car Park 51 21 Tariff For Video and Photograph Shooting 55 22 Tariff For General Aviation Terminal 56 23 Tariff For Porter 58 24 Tariff For Medical Services 59 25 Tariff For Baggage Room Services 60 26 Tariff For Baggage Tracking Service 61 Activation : This tariff becomes valid upon the approval of General Directorate of State Airports Authority (DHMI) with effect from 1st January 2020 and it remains valid until the new tariff. Legal Disclaimer : These tariffs are valid for Airport/Terminal Operators. The official transcript of this text is in Turkish. The text in Turkish is applied in any legal dispute.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Volatility Steadies the Climb
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Global volatility steadies the climb Cirium Fleet Forecast’s latest outlook sees heady growth settling down to trend levels, with economic slowdown, rising oil prices and production rate challenges as factors Narrowbodies including A321neo will dominate deliveries over 2019-2038 Airbus DAN THISDELL & CHRIS SEYMOUR LONDON commercial jets and turboprops across most spiking above $100/barrel in mid-2014, the sectors has come down from a run of heady Brent Crude benchmark declined rapidly to a nybody who has been watching growth years, slowdown in this context should January 2016 low in the mid-$30s; the subse- the news for the past year cannot be read as a return to longer-term averages. In quent upturn peaked in the $80s a year ago. have missed some recurring head- other words, in commercial aviation, slow- Following a long dip during the second half Alines. In no particular order: US- down is still a long way from downturn. of 2018, oil has this year recovered to the China trade war, potential US-Iran hot war, And, Cirium observes, “a slowdown in high-$60s prevailing in July. US-Mexico trade tension, US-Europe trade growth rates should not be a surprise”. Eco- tension, interest rates rising, Chinese growth nomic indicators are showing “consistent de- RECESSION WORRIES stumbling, Europe facing populist backlash, cline” in all major regions, and the World What comes next is anybody’s guess, but it is longest economic recovery in history, US- Trade Organization’s global trade outlook is at worth noting that the sharp drop in prices that Canada commerce friction, bond and equity its weakest since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Change 3, FAA Order 7340.2A Contractions
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHANGE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 7340.2A CHG 3 SUBJ: CONTRACTIONS 1. PURPOSE. This change transmits revised pages to Order JO 7340.2A, Contractions. 2. DISTRIBUTION. This change is distributed to select offices in Washington and regional headquarters, the William J. Hughes Technical Center, and the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center; to all air traffic field offices and field facilities; to all airway facilities field offices; to all international aviation field offices, airport district offices, and flight standards district offices; and to the interested aviation public. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. July 29, 2010. 4. EXPLANATION OF CHANGES. Changes, additions, and modifications (CAM) are listed in the CAM section of this change. Changes within sections are indicated by a vertical bar. 5. DISPOSITION OF TRANSMITTAL. Retain this transmittal until superseded by a new basic order. 6. PAGE CONTROL CHART. See the page control chart attachment. Y[fa\.Uj-Koef p^/2, Nancy B. Kalinowski Vice President, System Operations Services Air Traffic Organization Date: k/^///V/<+///0 Distribution: ZAT-734, ZAT-464 Initiated by: AJR-0 Vice President, System Operations Services 7/29/10 JO 7340.2A CHG 3 PAGE CONTROL CHART REMOVE PAGES DATED INSERT PAGES DATED CAM−1−1 through CAM−1−2 . 4/8/10 CAM−1−1 through CAM−1−2 . 7/29/10 1−1−1 . 8/27/09 1−1−1 . 7/29/10 2−1−23 through 2−1−27 . 4/8/10 2−1−23 through 2−1−27 . 7/29/10 2−2−28 . 4/8/10 2−2−28 . 4/8/10 2−2−23 .
    [Show full text]
  • Report Appendices
    LAKE HOOD SEAPLANE BASE MASTER PLAN UPDATE Report Appendices September 2017 DOWL in conjunction with : RS&H, Southeast Strategies, and Solstice Advertising APPENDIX A Historical Photos of LHD THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK APPENDIX B Initial Survey Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK LAKE HOOD SEAPLANE BASE MASTER PLAN UPDATE User Survey Results April 2015 DOWL in conjunction with : RS&H, Southeast Strategies, and Solstice Advertising LAKE HOOD MASTER PLAN USER SURVEY RESULTS ANCHORAGE, ALASKA Prepared for: State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport P.O. Box 196960 Anchorage, Alaska 99519 Prepared by: DOWL 4041 B Street Anchorage, Alaska 99503 (907) 562-2000 AKSAS Number: 57737 April 2015 Lake Hood Master Plan Anchorage, Alaska User Survey Report April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ...............................................................................................1 WHO RESPONDED TO THE SURVEY .......................................................................................3 WHY DO YOU OPERATE FROM LHD .......................................................................................6 AIRCRAFT TYPES OPERATING OR POTENTIALLY OPERATING AT LHD .......................8 CAN/SHOULD LHD GROW .........................................................................................................9 INTEREST IN LEASING AND DEVELOPING AT LHD ..........................................................10 TYPE
    [Show full text]