DOCSLIB.ORG

“The Gloves Are Coming Off”: a Mixed Method Analysis of the Bush Administration’S Torture Memos

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“The Gloves Are Coming Off”: a Mixed Method Analysis of the Bush Administration’S Torture Memos “THE GLOVES ARE COMING OFF”: A MIXED METHOD ANALYSIS OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION’S TORTURE MEMOS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY DANERYL MAY NIER-WEBER DISSERTATION ADVISOR: DR. LINDA HANSON Ball State University Muncie, Indiana April 2011 © Copyright by Daneryl May Nier-Weber All rights reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures and Tables v Acknowledgments vi Dear Reader vii Ch. I: The Great Divide 1 Research Questions/Rationale 6 Ch II: Review of the Literature 14 Ch. III: Methods and Methodology 36 Mixed Methods Approach: Grounded Theory and Critical Discourse Analysis 40 Previous Study I: “In Your Face” 42 Previous Study II: “Psycho vs. Sockpuppet” 47 Methods Chosen For This Study 50 Ch. IV: The Scene, The Agents, Their Agency, and Their Purpose: Conceptions of Power and the Torture Debate 62 The Memos 71 Memos as Agency: Authorization for Torture 74 The Actors: The Men Behind the Memos 87 Conceptions of power 95 Ideological Provenance of the Memos 97 To Protect and Defend 102 Linguistic and Semantic Masking 113 Ch. V: Torture and the Law 122 Semantic Shifts and their Material Enactments 131 “Civilization’s fight” 135 An Act of War 143 Ch. VI: Thirty-Nine Documents 148 Exceptionalism and the Rhetoric of Crisis 150 National Security 158 Defense 174 War/Not War 184 iv Ch. VII: The “Semantic Tap-Dance”: Discursive, Rhetorical, and Lexico- Grammatical Strategies in the Torture Memos 187 Authoritarianism and the Torture Memos 191 Framing 199 Argument Structure 201 Conflation 202 Elisions and Substitutions 212 Intertextuality 216 War/Not War, Continued 227 Hyperlexicalization and the Ideological Square 233 Ch. VIII: Constructions of Identity 239 Outcasting 250 Ch. IX: Constructing Torture 290 Semantic Reversal: Extraordinary Renditions 292 Doc 22: The Torture Memo 306 Agent Deletion 333 Ch. X: Analysis and Conclusions 343 Will to Power 346 Rhetoric and the Law 355 Failure to Protect 364 Findings and implications for further research 374 A final comment on authoritarianism 379 Works Cited 390 Appendix I: List of the Key Documents 411 v List of Figures and Tables Table 2.1 Possible differences in liberal versus conservative worldviews 25 Table 3.1 Frames identified in blog study II 49 Table 3.2 Linguistic markers identified in blog study II 49 Table 3.3 Similarities and differences in discursive practices from blog studies I & II 50 Table 3.4 Preliminary results from both studies 50 Table 3.5 Methodology, Methods, and Rationales 51 Table 3.6 Huckin’s two-way four-level method of analysis 51 Table 3.7 Level of granularity IV: Higher level concepts from Huckin 55 Table 3.8 Level of granularity III: Text 56 Table 3.9 Level of granularity II: Sentence/utterance 56 Table 3.10 Level of granularity I: Word/phrase 57 Table 3.11 Key markers of semantic, linguistic, and discursive strategies 59 Table 4.1 List of key documents identified by torturingdemocracy.org 67-71 Table 4.2 Top level officials during the first term of the Bush Administration 87 Table 5.1 Article 18 Section 2340 of the U.S. Code: the definition of torture 126 Table 5.2 Article 18 Section 2340 of the U.S. Code: the crime of torture 127 Table 5.3 The United Nations Convention Against Torture 128 Table 6.1 Collocates for plenary 170 Table 6.2 Frequency of words pertaining to the defense frame 182 Table 7.1 Major frames and language-based strategies 200 Table 7.2 Intertextuality example I 218 Table 7.3 Intertextuality example II 220 Table 7.4 Intertextuality example III 221 Table 7.5 Intertextuality example IV 222 Table 9.1 U.S. Code vs. Yoo 316 Table 9.2 Yoo vs. medical statute 325 Table 9.3 U.S. Code Section 2340 329 Table 10.1 The three research questions 375 Table 10.2 Codes/descriptors with examples for level of granularity IV 376 Table 10.3 Codes/descriptors with examples for level of granularity III 376 Table 10.4 Codes/descriptors with examples for level of granularity II 377 Table 10.5 Codes/descriptors with examples for level of granularity I 377 Table 10.6 Low- versus high-scoring authoritarians, from Hetherington and Weiler 380 Figure 3.1 Burke’s dramatistic pentad 52 Figure 3.2 Domains of analysis 55 Figure 6.1 Screen shot of concordance for plenary 170 Figures 6.2 & 6.3 Word list 1 & 2 sorted by frequency 182 vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As my wonderful friend Heidi Skurat Harris has said, all writing occurs in communities of support. This dissertation, too, is no exception. Heidi, I could not have gotten here without you who walked all paths before me and generously led the way. Thanks to Jacob for his support and to Daria, who has filled my life here with laughter, love, and light. You are my family away from home. To my committee, thank you for your willingness to put up with hundreds of pages of reading and for your feedback and advice. To Dr. Linda Hanson especially, for all your help, encouragement, and the friendship that will last far beyond this degree. To Gunther, too, for your humor and humanity and for showing me what it looks like to never know a stranger. To Casey McArdle, the best buddy a grad student could have. I am in awe of your work ethic, your energy, your humor, and your commitment to integrity. You are a true friend and I couldn’t have done it without your help. To all my Ball State friends, thank you for the support and encouragement during our years of exploration and fun. Special thanks also to Shawna Sewell; without you, our small world would not turn. To the wonderful English Department at Butler as well, who started me on this journey and who remain the best cheerleaders I could have wished for. To the triumvirate of girlfriends, Alicia Rasley, Tasha Buttler, and Mariam van Wesenbeeck, each of whom helped me through the hard times and reminded me what it’s all for. Especially to Alicia, who did the heavy lifting through twenty pages of MLA citations and made the impossible possible with effortless grace. To the students, faculty, and staff at EOU, too numerous to name, who have made this a year of continuing discovery and delight. To Marge and Charlie, Jim and Beth, and Ari, I love you. Thank you for being so supportive and proud, and for all your encouragement and love. To Mom, who gave me music and joy: I miss you every day. To my beloved German family: Klaus and Ingrid, Juergen, and to Baerbel, the finest mother I could have wished for. I will love you all, always. To Ty, who has been my steadfast support, my partner, my best friend, my patient and abiding love. Thank you, too, for looking after the babies: Juno, Calli, and Nick. To LeeAnna and Doyle, Hanna and Elliott, Jerry and Connie, and Annette, the best family a girl could have. I love you all. Most of all to my sons, Sascha Alexander and Nicholas Jakob, who have given me riches beyond measure. I love you two more than I could ever say, and I am prouder of both of you than you will ever know. May you both fulfill your greatest dreams. vii “As Orwell predicted, the English language had to disappear first.” –Andrew Sullivan Dear Reader: The subject of this dissertation is a set of 39 key documents from the website Torturing Democracy. Most of these documents were authored by a small group of attorneys in the Office of Legal Counsel, principally John Yoo. In order to avoid forcing readers to differentiate between over two dozen citations by the same author, I devised a system that I hope will facilitate the reading. The 39 Documents, therefore, appear in the text as “Doc 1,” “Doc 2,” and so on. Page numbers are cited in parentheses after the Doc number, separated by a comma. Thus page 18 in Document 22 would appear as follows: (Doc 22, 18). A footnote is marked as FN with the number used in the document. When necessary, I have also provided the name of the author. A full list of the documents, including their number, author(s), title, date, and a brief summary of their content can be found near the beginning of Chapter IV. For easy reference, I have also included the full list in Appendix I. The summaries are taken largely from the summaries provided by Torturing Democracy, where the documents have been posted for easy access by Washington Media Associates in association with the National Security Archive based at George Washington University’s Gelman Library. They are part of a much larger collection called The Torture Archive. The full page count of the these 39 documents alone numbers 675; it was, therefore, simply not feasible to include the complete texts of the documents themselves as an appendix. The entire archive will nonetheless remain, I hope, easily accessible at torturingdemocracy.org. A last note: I have come to view the 39 legal documents that are the focus of this study as a kind of “ground zero” (to use the battered term) of political discourse, representative of many of the extreme and polarized assumptions of right versus left that define the divisions between worldviews. In that sense, the discourse of the war on terror, of which the rhetoric of torture is a key part, is an ideal object of study. The discourse of 9/11 and the subsequent response (and indeed, much of what preceded it) throw disparate views on morality, good and evil, what it means to protect and defend, human rights, and the nature of legitimate authority—to name just a few of the core issues—into sharp relief.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • I Have Been Working on a Book, Stand-Ins, on The
    Workshop Participants: I have been working on a book, Stand-Ins, on the causes and consequences of temporary leadership in government, business, and religion, which is aimed at a more general audience. Given recent events, I have returned to more traditional scholarship to explore some of the issues involving temporary leadership (and the lack thereof) in federal agencies, among other topics. This paper is brand new, incomplete, and unpolished. Given its length, I would recommend reading the Introduction (pp.1-5), Scope of Actings (pp.13-27), and Statutory Questions (pp.33-42). I look forward to your reactions and suggestions for improvement. AJO Actings Anne Joseph O’Connell Stanford Law School April 1, 2019 Please do not cite or distribute beyond the workshop without permission. I. Introduction Stand-in leaders do not usually command much attention. They step up in moments of need to keep organizations running. The stereotypical interim leader is therefore a caretaker—in place to maintain stability; not to implement major changes. But not all interim leaders are caretakers. Some are auditioning for the permanent job. And a few are there to shake up the organization—so-called “fixers”. The scope of temporary leadership is vast—after all, traditional leaders are transitory, and selection procedures for more permanent leaders take time. On the public side, there are interim leaders in all branches of the federal government. In Congress, there are appointed senators, chosen by their state’s governor to fill in for an elected senator who has died or resigned, perhaps in disgrace or perhaps to take a different job.
    [Show full text]
  • US-CHINA TRADE WAR Uneasy Truce
    Xi Jinping and China’s new era Japan Emperor’s enthronement WeWork’s debacle MCI(P) 087/05/2019 November 2019 INDEPENDENT • INSIDER • INSIGHTS ON ASIA Best New Print Product and Best News Brand in Asia-Pacic, International News Media Association (INMA) Global Media Awards 2019 US-CHINA TRADE WAR Uneasy truce A partial trade deal is on the anvil for the world’s two leading superpowers. Will it be the breakthrough for global trade? Or, will hostilities prevail? WE BRING YOU SINGAPORE AND THE WORLD UP TO DATE IN THE KNOW News | Live blog | Mobile pushes Web specials | Newsletters | Microsites WhatsApp | SMS Special Features IN THE LOOP ON THE WATCH Facebook | Twitter | Instagram Videos | FB live | Live streams To subscribe to the free newsletters, go to str.sg/newsletters All newsletters connect you to stories on our straitstimes.com website. Data Digest Airlines’ emissions rising faster than predicted FLYING FREQUENTLY IS DAMAGING THE trajectory, aviation emissions could roughly environment at a rate far higher than estimated, triple by 2050, by which time aviation emissions says a new report by the United Nations’ might account for 25 per cent of the global carbon International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO). budget, it adds. Greenhouse gas emissions from commercial Flights within the Asia-Pacific region emitted aviation totalled 918 million tonnes last year, the largest share of passenger transport-related accounting for 2.4 per cent of global CO2 CO2 at 25 per cent of the global total. The leading emissions from fossil fuel use and a 32 per cent countries in this list are China, Japan, India and increase over the past five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments in Torture: Evidence of Human Subject Research and Experimentation in the “Enhanced” Interrogation Program
    EXPERIMENTS IN TORTURE: Evidence of Human Subject Research and Experimentation in the “Enhanced” Interrogation Program A White Paper by Physicians for Human Rights June 2010 Authors & This report was reviewed and edited by Stephen Greene, Communications Consultant to PHR. It was prepared for Acknowledgements publication by Gurukarm Khalsa, PHR Web Editor/ Producer. Jared Voss, PHR Web Editor/Producer, produced the video associated with the report. The lead author for this report is Nathaniel Raymond, Director of the Campaign Against Torture/Campaign for PHR is deeply indebted to critical research performed Accountability at Physicians for Human Rights (PHR). The by Daniel Scarvalone, Louise Place, and Jesse Hamlin. lead medical author is Scott Allen, MD, Co-Director of the This report could not have been written without their Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights at Brown contributions. University and Medical Advisor to PHR. They were joined in writing the report by Vincent Iacopino, MD, PhD, PHR Senior Medical Advisor; Allen Keller, MD, Bellevue/NYU Program for Survivors of Torture; Stephen Soldz, PhD, President-elect of Psychologists for Social Responsibility and Director of the Center for Research, Evaluation and Physicians for Program Development at the Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis; Steven Reisner, PhD, PHR Advisor on Human Rights Ethics and Psychology; and John Bradshaw, JD, PHR Chief Policy Officer and Director of PHR’s Washington DC Office. PHR was founded in 1986 on the idea that health profes- sionals, with their specialized skills, ethical commitments, This report has benefited from review by Deborah and credible voices, are uniquely positioned to investigate Ascheim, MD, Associate Professor of Health Policy and the health consequences of human rights violations and Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and PHR board work to stop them.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History and Our Times
    The Columbia Center for Oral History, The Oral History Master of Arts Program, INCITE | Interdisciplinary Center for Innovative Theory & Empirics, with Funding from the Paul F. Lazarsfeld Lecture Series, Present: ORAL HISTORY AND OUR TIMES PROGRAM May 1 and May 2, 2013 Maison Française, East Gallery Columbia University New York, New York May 2013 3 CO-SPONSORS Oral History Master of Arts (OHMA) is a one-year interdisciplinary Master of Arts degree program in the field of oral history that focuses on interviewing methodologies and interpretative methods. OHMA links social sciences and humanities research across disciplines including: History, Sociology, Literature, Anthropology, Psychology and Public Health. oralhistory.columbia.edu The Columbia University Center for Oral History [CCOH] is one of the world’s leading centers for the practice and teaching of oral history. Our archive, located in the Columbia University Libraries and open to the public, holds more than 8,000 interviews, in audio, video and text formats, on a wide variety of subjects. Our mission is to record unique life histories, documenting the central historical events and memories of our times, and to teach and do research across the disciplines. library.columbia.edu/indiv/ccoh/about.html INCITE | Interdisciplinary Center for Innovative Theory and Empirics cultivates public intelligence concerning socially and culturally vital ideas that can be advanced by research, education and conversation at the interdisciplinary seams that the social sciences share with the humanities, the sciences and one another. incite.columbia.edu The Paul F. Lazarsfeld Lecture Series explores and forges new methodological connections between the disciplines of the humanities and social sciences, while serving as a site for intellectual cooperation between students, faculty, and guests.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 17-965 In the S upreme Court of the United States DONALD J. TRUMP , PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES , ET AL ., petitioners v. STATE OF HAWAII , ET AL ., respondents On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE EVAN MCMULLIN, ANNE APPLEBAUM, MAX BOOT, LINDA CHAVEZ, ELIOT COHEN, MINDY FINN, JULEANNA GLOVER, NORMAN ORNSTEIN, MICHAEL STEELE, CHARLIE SYKES, AND JERRY TAYLOR IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS R. REEVES ANDERSON JOHN B. BELLINGER , III ARNOLD & PORTER Counsel of Record KAYE SCHOLER LLP ELLIOTT C. MOGUL 370 Seventeenth St. KAITLIN KONKEL Suite 4400 ARNOLD & PORTER Denver, CO 80202 KAYE SCHOLER LLP (303) 863-1000 601 Mass. Ave., NW Washington, DC 20001 (202) 942-5000 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Interest of Amici Curiae .............................................. 1 Introduction and Summary of Argument ................... 2 Argument ..................................................................... 4 I. EO-3 contravenes the prohibition on nationality-based discrimination that Congress, with support from almost all Republicans, adopted in 1965 ................................ 5 A. Congress intended to eliminate “all vestiges of discrimination against any national group” from our immigration system ............................................................... 6 1. Members of both parties, and Republicans in particular, strenuously repudiated the discriminatory policies that predated the 1965 Act ......................... 7 2. The 1965 Act rectified missteps in U.S. immigration policy ............................ 12 3. The principles underlying the 1965 Act are now fundamental to our national identity ........................................ 16 B. EO-3 runs afoul of Congress’s nondiscrimination guarantee ......................... 18 II. The President may not substitute his alternative policy judgments for Congress’s comprehensive statutory immigration scheme ..
    [Show full text]
  • A New Forensics: Developing Standard Remote Sensing Methodologies to Detect and Document Mass Atrocities Nathaniel A
    Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal Volume 8 | 2014 Humanitarian Technologies and Issue 3 | Article 6 Genocide Prevention A New Forensics: Developing Standard Remote Sensing Methodologies to Detect and Document Mass Atrocities Nathaniel A. Raymond Harvard University, [email protected] Brittany L. Card Harvard University, [email protected] Isaac L. Baker Harvard University, [email protected] Abstract. Aim: The aim of this article is to highlight potential methods applicable to a standard forensic approach for the analysis of high-resolution satellite imagery that may contain evidence of alleged mass atrocities. Methods: The primary method employed is the retrospective analysis of a case study involving the use of high-resolution satellite imagery analysis to document alleged mass atrocities. The case study utilized herein is the Satellite Sentinel Project’s reporting on the May 2011 sacking of Abyei Town by Government of Sudan-aligned armed actors. In the brief case study, categories of objects, patterns of activities, and types of alleged mass atrocity events are applied the Abyei Town incident. Recommended Citation Raymond, Nathaniel A.; Card, Brittany L.; and Baker, Isaac L. (2014) "A New Forensics: Developing Standard Remote Sensing Methodologies to Detect and Document Mass Atrocities," Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: Vol. 8: Iss. 3: 33-48. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.8.3.4 Available at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/gsp/vol8/iss3/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Tampa Library at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • CCR Annual Report 2010
    Annual Report 2010 Resettlement U.N. Advocacy Supreme Court GTMO Client Legal Advocacy Legal Advocacy Delegation CCR Client Legal Advocacy Both Our Mission The Center for Constitutional Rights is a non-profit legal and educational organization dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change. CCR Annual Report 2010 Letter from the President 2 Letter from the Executive Director 3 Material Support 4 Guantánamo 6 International Human Rights 8 Policing and Prisons 14 Immigrant Justice 16 Employment Discrimination 18 Right to Dissent 20 Movement Support 22 CCR Media 24 Letter from the Legal Director 26 Case Index 27 Friends and Allies 37 2010 President’s Reception 42 CCR Donors 43 Board of Directors and Staff 56 Financial Report 58 In Memoriam 59 Rhonda Copelon Remembered 60 Letter from the President I look back on this last year at CCR with As our Guantánamo work begins to wind amazement. For those of us with progressive down, we have built up our involvement in politics and who believe in social justice, we other important areas. A good example is our are not in the best of times. Justice and equal- racial and economic justice docket which has ity have paid a high cost for years and years expanded significantly this year. In addition of conservative and moderate to our ongoing work fighting racial appointments to the courts and an profiling and employment discrimina- irresponsible “war-time” deference to tion and in defending the right to the executive branch.
    [Show full text]
  • 16-1650 Fields Amicus Final 10-31-16
    Case: 16-1650 Document: 003112449962 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2016 NOS. 16-1650 & 16-1651 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT RICHARD FIELDS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et ano, DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. AMANDA GERACI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. On Appeal from the Memorandum and Order Granting Partial Summary Judgment Dated February 19, 2016, at United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case Nos. 14-cv-4424 & 14-cv-5264 The Honorable Mark A. Kearney, United States District Court Judge BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS AND REVERSAL Sophia Cope Adam Schwartz ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 815 Eddy Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Email: [email protected] Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Case: 16-1650 Document: 003112449962 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/31/2016 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Pursuant to Rule 26.1 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Amicus Curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation states that it does not have a parent corporation and that no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. ii Case: 16-1650 Document: 003112449962 Page: 3 Date Filed: 10/31/2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ........................................................ ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................ iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Medicare Drug War
    The Medicare Drug War: An Army of Nearly 1,000 Lobbyists Pushes a Medicare Law that Puts Drug Company and HMO Profits Ahead of Patients and Taxpayers Congress Watch June 2004 Acknowledgments The primary author of “The Medicare Drug War” was Investigative Reporter Craig Aaron. Senior Researcher Taylor Lincoln provided substantial research and technical assistance. Additional research provided by Legislative Assistant Cristina Francisco and researchers Amanda Morse, Andrea Parsons and Peter Hickey. Research Director Neal Pattison and Legislative Assistant Jessica Kutch also helped prepare this report. Congress Watch Director Frank Clemente made significant editorial contributions to this report. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a 160,000 member non-profit organization based in Washington, D.C. representing consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, research and public education. Since its founding in 1971, Public Citizen has fought for consumer rights in the marketplace, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform, fair trade, clean and safe energy sources, and corporate and government accountability. Public Citizen has five divisions and is active in every public forum: Congress, the courts, governmental agencies and the media. Congress Watch is one of the five divisions. Public Citizen’s Congress Watch 215 Pennsylvania Ave S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003 Phone: 202-546-4996 Fax: 202-547-7392 www.citizen.org ©2004 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. Price $20.00 Call Public Citizen’s Publication Office, 1-800-289-3787 for additional orders and pricing information or consult our web site at www.citizen.org. Major credit cards accepted. Or write to: Members Services Public Citizen 1600 20th Street, N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Cairncross Review a Sustainable Future for Journalism
    THE CAIRNCROSS REVIEW A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE FOR JOURNALISM 12 TH FEBRUARY 2019 Contents Executive Summary 5 Chapter 1 – Why should we care about the future of journalism? 14 Introduction 14 1.1 What kinds of journalism matter most? 16 1.2 The wider landscape of news provision 17 1.3 Investigative journalism 18 1.4 Reporting on democracy 21 Chapter 2 – The changing market for news 24 Introduction 24 2.1 Readers have moved online, and print has declined 25 2.2 Online news distribution has changed the ways people consume news 27 2.3 What could be done? 34 Chapter 3 – News publishers’ response to the shift online and falling revenues 39 Introduction 39 3.1 The pursuit of digital advertising revenue 40 Case Study: A Contemporary Newsroom 43 3.2 Direct payment by consumers 48 3.3 What could be done 53 Chapter 4 – The role of the online platforms in the markets for news and advertising 57 Introduction 57 4.1 The online advertising market 58 4.2 The distribution of news publishers’ content online 65 4.3 What could be done? 72 Cairncross Review | 2 Chapter 5 – A future for public interest news 76 5.1 The digital transition has undermined the provision of public-interest journalism 77 5.2 What are publishers already doing to sustain the provision of public-interest news? 78 5.3 The challenges to public-interest journalism are most acute at the local level 79 5.4 What could be done? 82 Conclusion 88 Chapter 6 – What should be done? 90 Endnotes 103 Appendix A: Terms of Reference 114 Appendix B: Advisory Panel 116 Appendix C: Review Methodology 120 Appendix D: List of organisations met during the Review 121 Appendix E: Review Glossary 123 Appendix F: Summary of the Call for Evidence 128 Introduction 128 Appendix G: Acknowledgements 157 Cairncross Review | 3 Executive Summary Executive Summary “The full importance of an epoch-making idea is But the evidence also showed the difficulties with often not perceived in the generation in which it recommending general measures to support is made..
    [Show full text]
  • A FRAMEWORK for the ETHICAL USE of ADVANCED DATA SCIENCE METHODS in the HUMANITARIAN SECTOR Executive Summary
    A FRAMEWORK FOR THE ETHICAL USE OF ADVANCED DATA SCIENCE METHODS IN THE HUMANITARIAN SECTOR Executive Summary What is this document? This is a framework for applying data science methods for humanitarian outcomes. It aims to provide a set of ethical and practical guidelines for humanitarian data collectors, users, and stakeholders to consider when applying data science for humanitarian work. This work is at the juncture of data science (in particular AI), ethics, responsible data management,1 humanitarian innovation, and humanitarian principles and standards. Who is this document for? This framework provides a practical guide for a broad range of humanitarian data stakeholders ranging from users, collectors and enumerators on the ground to data scientists, project focal points, programme managers and donors. It can also assist private and civil sector actors that work in or are interested in working in humanitarian work, and can be a useful resource for academics, students and policy staff. How was this document made? This framework is the first output of the Humanitarian Data Science and Ethics Group (DSEG) - a multi- stakeholder group established in 2018. It is an outcome of a consultative process based on the discussions during DSEG meetings and resulting identified priorities. This document draws perspectives from programme staff from various areas of humanitarian work, such as camp coordination and camp management (CCCM); Cash; Shelter; Protection; Gender Based Violence (GBV) prevention; and Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH). It refers extensively to existing academic and humanitarian documents and frameworks, combines research and interviews with various humanitarian field staff officers, and reflects inputs from a thorough review process involving diverse data stakeholders and experts.
    [Show full text]
  • An Open Letter on the Question of Torture
    1 Torture, Aggressive War & Presidential Power: Thoughts on the Current Constitutional Crisisi Thomas Ehrlich Reifer October 2009 Abstract: This chapter analyses the intersection of torture, aggressive war and Presidential power in the 21st century, with particular attention to the current Constitutional crisis and related international humanitarian/human rights law, including treaties signed and ratified by the U.S., from the Geneva Conventions to the U.N. Convention Against Torture. America's embrace of a ªliberal culture of tortureº af1ter 9/11 is examined, as well as the road leading from Bagram Air Base to Guantanamo to Abu Ghraib. Prospects for change are also analyzed, in light of revelations about the role of both the Democrats and Republicans in policies of torture, extraordinary rendition and aggressive war, past and present. For Sister Dianna "Why is there this inability to reckon with the moral and spiritual facts?"ii ªThe abuse of detainees in U.S. custody cannot simply be attributed to the actions of `a few bad apples' acting on their own. The fact is that senior officials in the United States government solicited information on how to use aggressive techniques, redefined the law to create the appearance of their legality, and authorized their use against detainees.ºiii 2009 initially brought sharp relief to torture abolitionists in the U.S. and around the world, as President Obama, in his first week in office, signed three executive orders 1) closing Guantanamo in a year 2) creating a task force to examine policies towards prisoners caught up in the ªwar on terrorº and 3) mandating lawful interrogations in compliance with the Army Field Manual and thus international agreements.
    [Show full text]