Screening Love: the Cinematic Representation of the Cultural
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Screening Love: The Cinematic Representation of the Cultural Revolution, 1980s to Early 1990s Jingyi Lu Faculty Advisor: Guo-juin Hong Asian and Middle Eastern Studies May 2017 This project was submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate Liberal Studies Program in the Graduate School of Duke University. Copyright by Jingyi Lu May 2016 LU III Abstract The ten-year Cultural Revolution exerts a tremendous influence on the domain of cultural production in contemporary China. After the Cultural Revolution, many filmmakers delved into the representation of this traumatic historical period and produced relevant films in the 1980s – 1990s. In these films, the motif of love is frequently employed to embody the impact of the Cultural Revolution on interpersonal relationships. What types of love relations do these films represent? How do the modes of love change over time? How do these films represent the Cultural Revolution and identify the root causes of this disastrous time? In this essay, to answer the above questions, I will explore the changing representation of love relations in the films about the Cultural Revolution: the scar films (also called post-socialist films) that prevailed in the 1980s feature romantic love, while The Blue Kite, Farewell, My Concubine and To Live directed by the fifth-generation filmmakers in the early 1990s mainly display family love. By looking into the cinematic interpretation of the Cultural Revolution, I will gain insight into the social and cultural environment in that two decades, and show that the films produced in these two different periods seek greater authenticity in representing that historical period and gradually break away from state ideology and propaganda. Keywords The Cultural Revolution, Romantic Love, Family Love, Post-socialist, The Fifth Generation, Cinematic Representation, state ideology LU IV Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................. III List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... V Acknowledgement ............................................................................................................ VI Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1: Romantic Love in Scar Films of the 1980s ....................................................... 16 Chapter 2: Family Love in the Fifth-Generation Films of the Early 1990s ........................ 33 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 51 Bibliography ...................................................................................................................... 55 Filmography ...................................................................................................................... 59 LU V List of Figures Fig. 1 On a rainy day, Hu Yuyin and Qin Shutian are being sentenced; p. 24 Fig. 2 Geng Hua and Zhou Yun are dating on Lushan Mountain; p. 29 Fig. 3 The shadow puppets are played in the gambling house and in collective labor; Fugui put the new-born chickens in the box which was used to contain the shadow puppets; p. 46 Fig. 4 Tietou flies the blue kite with his family members and sees the broken kite at the end of the film; p. 48 LU VI Acknowledgement I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to my advisor Professor Guo-Juin Hong for his patient guidance in my completion of my master’s project. He provides me with great encouragement and valuable advice in the whole process. Without his generous help, this project would not have been completed. I am also indebted to other members of my master’s project committee, Professor Kent Wicker and Professor Donna Zapf, for their constructive suggestions. Finally, I would like to thank my parents for financially and emotionally supporting my studies and urging me to do my utmost in my academic development. LU 1 Introduction As history is frequently portrayed in both fictional and documentary films, many scholars begin to pay attention to the relation between cinema and history. Although cinema could not visualize the original historical scenes and moments, to some degree it allows written historical records to take on a concrete form. Through a set of arrangements, it entails expressivity in performance. As the French historian Marc Ferro considers, “film acts as a historical agent,” in that the invention of cinema came on the historical stage as a scientific breakthrough and cinema as an art could process and inculcate history (14). In reconstructing a certain historical period, historical films essentially aim to convey a certain ideology by mystifying the filmic images (Barthes 377–379). In addition, the historicity of historical films is not only embodied in their content but also in the particular time when they were produced. On this point, another scholar, Pierre Sorlin, thinks that, instead of merely representing the past, the historical films are intended to express certain ideas about the present when they process the past (71). Therefore, to analyze historical films, plots, the time of the production of films, the modes and codes of filmic narratives, should all be taken into consideration. Focusing on the relation between cinema and history, I aim to establish a connection between modern Chinese cinema and history in this project. I am particularly interested in the films which represent the Cultural Revolution, especially in the two decades after it (hereafter called Post-Cultural Revolution films). My interest in this field, first of all, arises from the LU 2 specificity of the history of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. It is distinguished from any historical traumas before it because it represents a nationwide violence on both the bodies and minds of numerous people and the betrayal of Chinese traditions and ethnics (M. Berry 5). The Cultural Revolution, an era characterized by collective hysteria, crazy worship of Chairman Mao and blind negation of the “old,” is in nature a “cultural holocaust” (Lu 67). Moreover, social chaos, mass mortality, and economic loss during that period determine the significant role of the Cultural Revolution in modern Chinese history. This time connects the era of socialist and nationalist transformation and the era of economic construction and causes long-term sequela to China today. Therefore, a profound reflection on the Cultural Revolution is paramount to a thorough understanding of China today (L. Li 1). When the Cultural Revolution came to an end, a profusion of artistic representations sprung up, and most of them are adapted from memoirs and historical data. These representations embody both the collective memory of the past and the collective mentality among Chinese people of rethinking that time (L. Li 2–3). Since the film industry revived in the early 1980s, numerous films have been produced to reflect on the Cultural Revolution and contribute greatly to shaping people’s understandings of this period. The production of these films over time indicates the huge and lasting impact of the Cultural Revolution on the contemporary Chinese society and culture and represents a significant part in the development of the Chinese cinema. Substantial scholarship has been conducted on the history of the Chinese cinema after LU 3 the Cultural Revolution from different perspectives. As for the films regarding the Cultural Revolution, there is a distinction between the relevant films produced in the 1980s which are called “scar films” and the films produced by the fifth-generation filmmakers in the early 1990s. The exemplary and most studied works in the 1980s are the trilogy directed by Xie Jin Legend of Tianyun Mountain (1980), The Herdsman (1982) and Hibiscus Town (1986). Some scholars contend that Xie Jin’s films oppose the state ideology and expose the dark sides of the Communist Party, but endorse traditional Chinese culture and Confucian thoughts, which the new generation film began to question from the mid-1980s (Semsel, Chen, and Xia 29–30). However, Paul Clark points out from the perspective of the purpose of filmmaking that Xie Jin’s films, including his scar films, are always adapted to the changing political environment and respond to the advocacy of the Communist Party. Xie Jin’s melodramas in the 1980s about the Cultural Revolution do not truly reflect on the trauma in the past decade, but engage the audience in moral and political indoctrination. Clark then observes a shift in Chinese cinema as the fifth-generation filmmakers rose in the mid-1980s and contends that their films no longer serve the ideological purposes and instead offer an allegorical interpretation of the reality (87– 98). Clark mainly centers on the accomplishments of the fifth-generation filmmakers in the 1980s, but he also admits that they did not stop making artistic advances in the 1990s even though the political events of 1989 thwarted film creation again (212). With China’s opening up, these filmmakers more boldly deal with the problems of the Communist party and use allegorical devices to represent the social or historical reality in an ambiguous way to eschew LU 4 the censorship (Creekmur and Sidel 178). The critic Wang Ban demonstrates the improvement in the narrative strategies of the