Araneae : Pholcidae)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids
Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity. -
SA Spider Checklist
REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region. -
Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4 -
A Checklist of the Spiders of Tanzania
Journal of East African Natural History 109(1): 1–41 (2020) A CHECKLIST OF THE SPIDERS OF TANZANIA A. Russell-Smith 1, Bailiffs Cottage, Doddington, Sittingbourne Kent ME9 0JU, UK [email protected] ABSTRACT A checklist of all published spider species from Tanzania is provided. For each species, the localities from which it was recorded are noted and a gazetteer of the geographic coordinates of all but a small minority of these localities is included. The results are discussed in terms of family species richness, the completeness of our knowledge of the spider fauna of this country and the likely biases in family composition. Keywords: Araneae, East Africa, faunistics, biodiversity INTRODUCTION Students of spiders are very fortunate in having a complete online catalogue that is continuously updated—the World Spider Catalog (http://www.wsc.nmbe.ch/). The catalogue also provides full text of virtually all the relevant systematic literature, allowing ready access to taxonomic accounts for all species. However, researchers interested in the spiders of a particular country face two problems in using the catalogue: 1. For species that have a widespread distribution, the catalogue often lists only the region (e.g. “East Africa”) or even the continent (“Africa”) from which it is recorded 2. The catalogue itself provides no information on the actual locations from which a species is recorded. There is thus a need for more detailed country checklists, particularly those outside the Palaearctic and Nearctic regions where most arachnologists have traditionally been based. In addition to providing an updated list of species from the country concerned, such catalogues can provide details of the actual locations from which each species has been recorded, together with geographical coordinates when these are available. -
INFORME Sobre Diversidad De Especies, Diversidad Genética Y Diversidad Cultural En El Perú
INFORME Sobre diversidad de especies, diversidad genética y diversidad cultural en el Perú 2do producto de la consultoria sobre Actualización del perfil de biodiversidad del país Sección VII del 6to Informe Nacional al CDB Preparado por: E. Daniel Cossios Meza Informe: Diversidad de Especies, Genética y Cultural del Perú. Septiembre 2018 Página 1 de 64 Septiembre del 2018 INFORME Sobre estado y tendencias de la diversidad de especies, genética y cultural en el Perú CONTENIDO I.- INTRODUCCION................................................................................................................... 6 II.- DIVERSIDAD DE ESPECIES BIOLÓGICAS EN EL PERU......................................... 7 2.1. RIQUEZA DE ESPECIES EN EL PERU.................................................................. 7 2.1.1. Riqueza de especies de flora.................................................................................. 7 2.1.2. Riqueza de especies de fauna................................................................................ 9 2.1.3. Otros grupos taxonómicos..................................................................................... 14 2.2. ESPECIES AMENAZADAS................................................................................... 15 2.2.1. Especies amenazadas según normas peruanas............................................... 15 2.2.2. Cambios en el tiempo en el número de especies amenazadas...................... 18 2.2.3. Diferencias con la categorización de la UICN a nivel global........................... -
Pholcid Spider Molecular Systematics Revisited, with New Insights Into the Biogeography and the Evolution of the Group
Cladistics Cladistics 29 (2013) 132–146 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00419.x Pholcid spider molecular systematics revisited, with new insights into the biogeography and the evolution of the group Dimitar Dimitrova,b,*, Jonas J. Astrinc and Bernhard A. Huberc aCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; bDepartment of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA; cForschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn, Germany Accepted 5 June 2012 Abstract We analysed seven genetic markers sampled from 165 pholcids and 34 outgroups in order to test and improve the recently revised classification of the family. Our results are based on the largest and most comprehensive set of molecular data so far to study pholcid relationships. The data were analysed using parsimony, maximum-likelihood and Bayesian methods for phylogenetic reconstruc- tion. We show that in several previously problematic cases molecular and morphological data are converging towards a single hypothesis. This is also the first study that explicitly addresses the age of pholcid diversification and intends to shed light on the factors that have shaped species diversity and distributions. Results from relaxed uncorrelated lognormal clock analyses suggest that the family is much older than revealed by the fossil record alone. The first pholcids appeared and diversified in the early Mesozoic about 207 Ma ago (185–228 Ma) before the breakup of the supercontinent Pangea. Vicariance events coupled with niche conservatism seem to have played an important role in setting distributional patterns of pholcids. Finally, our data provide further support for multiple convergent shifts in microhabitat preferences in several pholcid lineages. -
The Pholcid Spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae)
Butler University Digital Commons @ Butler University Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS College of Liberal Arts & Sciences 2008 The pholcid spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae) Joseph A. Beatty James W. Berry Butler University, [email protected] Bernhard A. Huber Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers Part of the Biology Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Beatty, Joseph A.; Berry, James W.; and Huber, Bernhard A., "The pholcid spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae)" Journal of Arachnology / (2008): 1-25. Available at https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/facsch_papers/782 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences at Digital Commons @ Butler University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarship and Professional Work - LAS by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Butler University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The pholcid spiders of Micronesia and Polynesia (Araneae, Pholcidae) Author(s): Joseph A. Beatty, James W. Berry, Bernhard A. Huber Source: Journal of Arachnology, 36(1):1-25. Published By: American Arachnological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1636/H05-66.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1636/H05-66.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. -
Arachnids of the Ngerukewid Islands Wildlife Preserve, Palau
Micronesica 24(2): 211- 215, 1991 Arachnids of the Ngerukewid Islands Wildlife Preserve, Palau ALEXANDER M. KERR The Marine Laboratory, University of Guam, Mangilao GU 96923 Abstract-A survey of arachnids in the Ngerukewid and Kmekumer Islands, Republic of Palau was conducted 5-15 January 1988. Twenty three specimens of Araneae were collected by the author from the fam ilies Ctenizidae, Uloboridae, Pholcidae, Scytodidae, Araneidae, Lycos idae, Pisauridae, Clubionidae and Salticidae. The scorpion Hormurus australasiae (Fabricius) and the tailless whipscorpion Charon grayi (Gervais) were also recorded. Introduction Little work has been done on the arachnids of Micronesia; the taxonomy and distribution of many species is uncertain and some areas have never been sampled (Samuelson & Nishida 1987). Among these places are the Ngerukewid Islands Wildlife Preserve and nearby Kmekumer Islands in the Palauan archi pelago. Arachnids were collected there from 5-15 January 1988 as part ofa larger study which documented the natural resources of these islands (Birkeland & Manner 1989). Twenty-five specimens were taken, comprising eleven different families, including members of the orders Araneae, Scorpiones and Amblypygi, the tailless whipscorpions. Some juveniles have not been identified to species. Other specimens may be undescribed, such as the unusual pisaurid collected on Island 16. Study Site The Ngerukewid and Kmekumer Islands are located in the southwestern comer of the Palauan Islands at about 7° 11'N latitude and 134 ° 16'E longitude. Island numbering in Figure 1 follows Wiles & Conry ( 1990), however, in this paper only sampled islands have been labeled. The islands are formed of uplifted coralline limestone and are small and steep; access to those without beaches is difficult because of undercutting. -
A Checklist of the Spiders (Arachnida, Araneae) of the Polokwane Nature Reserve, Limpopo Province, South Africa
Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA, ARANEAE) OF THE POLOKWANE NATURE RESERVE, LIMPOPO PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA SUSAN M. DIPPENAAR 1Department of Biodiversity School of Molecular & Life Sciences University of Limpopo South Africa ANSIE S. DIPPENAAR-SCHoEMAN ARC-Plant Protection Research Institute South Africa MoKGADI A. MoDIBA1 THEMBILE T. KHozA1 Correspondence to: Susan M. Dippenaar e-mail: [email protected] Postal Address: Private Bag X1106, Sovenga 0727, Republic of South Africa ABSTRACT As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA), spiders were collected from all the field layers in the Polokwane Nature Reserve (Limpopo Province, South Africa) over a period of a year (2005–2006) using four collecting methods. Six habitat types were sampled: Acacia tortillis open savanna; A. rehmanniana woodland, false grassland, riverine and sweet thorn thicket, granite outcrop; and Aloe marlothii thicket. A total of 13 821 spiders were collected (using sweep netting, tree beating, active searching and pitfall trapping) represented by 39 families, 156 determined genera and 275 species. The most diverse families are the Thomisidae (42 spp.), Araneidae (39 spp.) and Salticidae (29 spp.). A total of 84 spp. (30.5%) were web builders and 191 spp. (69.5%) wanderers. In the Polokwane Nature Reserve, 13.75% of South African species are presently protected. Keywords: Arachnida, Araneae, diversity, habitats, conservation In the early 1990s, South Africa was recognised, in terrestrial and KwaZulu-Natal, Mpumalanga and the Eastern Cape. terms, as a biologically very rich country and even identified Savanna is characterised by a grassy ground layer and a distinct as the world’s ‘hottest hotspot’ (Myers 1990). -
SANSA News, Issue 28, Jan-April 2017
1 SANSA NEWS South African National Survey of Arachnida Newsletter Date No 28 JAN APRIL 2017 FEEDBACK ON THE Inside this issue: 12 AFRAS COLLOQUIUM Feedback AFRAS colloquium …..1-2 22-25 January 2017 SANSA 20 years ………...................3 Medically important spiders..……….4 Spiders in and around the house…..5 University of the Free State…………6 University of Venda………………….7 ARC-PPR………...………………......8 National Mus of the Free State …….9 New genera…………………..……..10 Field observations Q and A…........ 11 Student project……………………...12 Soil paper…………………………...13 Recent publications……………......14 Last Word……………………….......15 NATIONAL SPIDER SPECIES COUNT JANUARY 2015 — 2171 species JUNE 2015 — 2192 species OCTOBER 2015 — 2220 species MAY 2016 — 2234 species DECEMBER 2016 — 2239 species APRIL 2017 — 2243 species Delegates at the colloquium The 12th AFRAS colloquium was hosted by the University of the Free State and the ARC. It was held at the Goudini Spa in the Worcester district, Western Cape, South Africa. The objectives of these Colloquia are to promote research on the African Arachnida (non-Acari) and to provide a fo- rum for the discussion of research on African arachnids in oral presentations, posters and work- Editors and coordinators: shops, as well as informal discussions. Ansie Dippenaar-Schoeman & A total of 40 delegates and five accompanying persons attended the colloquium, from as far afield Robin Lyle as Belgium, Israel, Russia, Czech Republic, Nigeria, Sudan, Zimbabwe, UK and USA. ARC-Plant Protection Research Private Bag X134 37 papers and 17 posters were presented during the colloquium Queenswood 0121 Two workshops were held, organized by Dr Ansie Dippenaar-Schoeman on the South African South Africa National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA), and by Dr Gerbus Muller on medically important spiders E-mail: [email protected] We also celebrated the 20th year of SANSA and 30th year of AFRAS. -
Huber Table S1
Electronic Supplement Huber B.A. Beyond size: sexual dimorphisms in pholcid spiders Table S1. Male and female >bia 1 lengths in 495 species of Pholcidae, with sample sizes and sources. The table lists only those species where at least five males and five females were measured. Species Male tibia 1 N ♂ Female tibia 1 N ♀ Reference length (mm) length (mm) Aetana abadae 10,20 6 8,10 13 Huber et al 2015a Aetana gaya 7,60 10 5,30 11 Huber et al 2015a Aetana indah 8,84 5 6,70 8 Huber et al 2015a Aetana kinabalu 8,30 7 6,40 15 Huber et al 2015a Aetana kiukoki 8,20 48 6,10 56 Huber et al 2015a Aetana lambir 7,40 19 6,20 26 Huber et al 2015a Aetana libjo 8,60 6 6,70 9 Huber et al 2015a Aetana loboc 7,10 7 5,30 17 Huber et al 2015a Aetana manansalai 8,30 5 6,30 13 Huber et al 2015a Aetana mokwam 11,70 8 9,90 15 Huber & Carvalho 2019 Aetana omayan 10,40 8 8,20 16 Huber et al 2015a Aetana ondawamei 9,10 5 8,30 6 Huber & Carvalho 2019 Aetana poring 6,80 5 5,10 12 Huber et al 2015a Anansus debakkeri 1,07 7 1,03 8 Huber 2007 Anopsicus ana 0,73 9 0,81 8 Huber & Villarreal 2020 Anopsicus chiriqui 1,72 15 1,54 9 Huber 1998c Anopsicus tico 1,90 20 1,95 20 Huber 1998c Apokayana kapit 11,30 8 8,20 6 Huber & Leh Moi Ung 2016 Apokayana tahai 8,30 5 6,70 5 Huber 2011 Arenita fazendinha 0,59 15 0,47 22 Huber & Carvalho 2019 Arnapa arfak 6,80 5 4,70 7 Huber & Carvalho 2019 Arnapa tinoor 6,60 28 4,50 37 Huber & Carvalho 2019 Arnapa tolire 5,70 5 4,10 9 Huber & Carvalho 2019 Artema atlanta 15,40 19 13,20 20 Aharon et al 2017 Artema bunkpurugu 19,80 8 16,10 20 Huber -
New World Pholcid Spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae): a Revision at Generic Level
NEW WORLD PHOLCID SPIDERS (ARANEAE: PHOLCIDAE): A REVISION AT GENERIC LEVEL BERNHARD A. HUBER Division of Invertebrate Zoology American Museum of Natural History BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Number 254, 348 pages, 1357 figures, 9 maps, 4 appendices Issued June 30, 2000 Price: $29.30 a copy Copyright ᭧ American Museum of Natural History 2000 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract ...................................................................... 04 Introduction ................................................................... 04 Materials and Methods ....................................................... 06 Acknowledgments ........................................................... 07 Phylogenetics ................................................................. 07 Terminal Taxa ............................................................... 07 Characters Scored ........................................................... 09 Characters Not Scored ....................................................... 32 Cladistic Analysis ........................................................... 34 Taxonomy—Pholcidae .......................................................... 41 Diagnosis ................................................................... 41 Description ................................................................. 46 Natural History .............................................................. 48 Composition ................................................................ 50 Key to New World Genera ..................................................