University of California, San Diego

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University of California, San Diego UC San Diego UC San Diego Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The social implications of ritual behavior in the Maya Lowlands : a perspective from Minanha, Belize Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2488f75d Author Schwake, Sonja Andrea Publication Date 2008 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The Social Implications of Ritual Behavior in the Maya Lowlands: A Perspective from Minanha, Belize. A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Sonja Andrea Schwake Committee in charge: Professor Geoffrey E. Braswell, Chair Professor Guillermo Algaze Professor Paul Goldstein Professor Elizabeth Newsome Professor Eric Van Young 2008 Copyright Sonja Andrea Schwake, 2008 All rights reserved. The dissertation of Sonja Andrea Schwake is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm: _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2008 iii DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my mother, Janja Van Lehn (Janette Schwake). Her endless support, love, and encouragement have helped me on so many occasions and I could not have completed this without her. She has an astonishing strength of spirit, and she has always taught me to reach for my dreams. Thanks Mom, you are the most amazing woman in the world, and a great inspiration to me. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page........................................................................................... iii Dedication.................................................................................................. iv Table of Contents.........................................................................................v List of Figures........................................................................................... vii List of Tables ...............................................................................................x Acknowledgments..................................................................................... xii Vita........................................................................................................... xvi Abstract.................................................................................................... xix I. Introduction..................................................................................................1 II. Ritual Theory, Mortuary Archaeology, and the Ancient Maya...................6 Theoretical Approaches to Ritual and Religion.....................................7 Mortuary Archaeology.........................................................................28 Mortuary Analysis in the Maya Area...................................................44 Cache and Ritual Offerings in the Maya Area.....................................56 Conclusion ...........................................................................................62 III. Research Design.........................................................................................66 Sampling Strategy and Methodology...................................................69 Excavation Biases ................................................................................71 Archaeological Expectations ...............................................................73 Conclusion ...........................................................................................77 IV. Environment, History, Site Description, and Previous Research ..............79 Environment, Climate, Flora, and Fauna.............................................79 Geology of Belize and the Vaca Plateau..............................................84 A Brief History of Modern Belize .......................................................87 History of Investigations at Minanha...................................................95 Site Description..................................................................................102 General Interpretations of Minanha Archaeology .............................105 Conclusion .........................................................................................108 V. Case Study: Minanha ...............................................................................113 Excavations in Group A.....................................................................113 v Excavations in Group S .....................................................................140 Excavations in the MRS4 Group .......................................................157 Conclusion .........................................................................................164 VI. Comparative Regional Perspectives ........................................................219 The Southeast Petén Region ..............................................................221 The Belize Valley Region..................................................................234 The Vaca Plateau Region...................................................................250 Similarity and Disjunction: Trends in the Mortuary Sample.............263 Conclusion .........................................................................................271 VII. Mortuary Archaeology at Minanha .......................................................303 Regional Tradition: Commoner Mortuary Practice ............................305 Representation of Group Identity: Lesser Elite Mortuary Practice ....308 Social Memory and Community: Apical Elite Mortuary Practice......315 Discussion and Conclusion.................................................................322 VIII. The Minanha Mortuary Assemblage.....................................................331 Appendix..................................................................................................337 References................................................................................................357 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1: Graph of traditional hierarchical model of social organization..............64 Figure 2.2: Graphic representation of triangulation effect for lesser elites ...............65 Figure 4.1: Top plan and section of the site from the 1927 expedition ...................110 Figure 4.2: Regional location of Minanha ...............................................................111 Figure 4.3: Site core of Minanha .............................................................................112 Figure 5.1: Structure 3A with location of excavation units.....................................165 Figure 5.2: Incensario fragment...............................................................................166 Figure 5.3: Top plan of Unit 3A-1 (3A-1st construction).........................................167 Figure 5.4: Profile Unit 3A-1...................................................................................168 Figure 5.5: Chert eccentric lithics............................................................................169 Figure 5.6: Sierra Red: Society Hall vessel .............................................................170 Figure 5.7: Top plan of Structure 3A, Units 3A-1, 3A-2, and 3A-3........................171 Figure 5.8: Top plan of Unit 3A-2...........................................................................172 Figure 5.9: Top plan of Units 3A-2 and 3A-3, top of 3A-B/3 capstones ................173 Figure 5.10: Structure 3A, running profile of Burial 3A-B/3...................................174 Figure 5.11: Top plan Unit 3A-2 and Burial 3A-B/3.................................................175 Figure 5.12: East-West running profile of Structure 3A............................................176 Figure 5.13: Top plan, Structure 4A, Unit 4A-1, Level 3..........................................177 Figure 5.14: Unit 4A-1, profile looking east..............................................................178 Figure 5.15: Top plan Structure 4A, Unit 4A-1, Level 5...........................................179 Figure 5.16: Top plan of Group S, showing location of Structure 77S`....................180 Figure 5.17: Profile map of Structure 77S, Unit 77S-1 .............................................181 vii Figure 5.18: Top plan of Unit 77S-1, Level 3............................................................182 Figure 5.19: Top plan of Burial 77S-B/1...................................................................183 Figure 5.20: Top plan of Burial 77S-B/1, Units 77S-1 and 77S-2 ............................184 Figure 5.21: Profile of Structure 77S, Unit 77S-2 .....................................................185 Figure 5.22: Top plan of Burial 77S-B/2 chamber, Structure 77S ............................186 Figure 5.23: Profile map of Burial 77S-B/2...............................................................187 Figure 5.24: Top plan of Burial 77S-B/2, Structure 77S ...........................................188 Figure 5.25: Shell adorno and pin from Burial 77S-B/2............................................189 Figure 5.26: Late Classic period Tu-Tu Camp ceramic group vessel........................190 Figure 5.27: Late Classic orangeware plate from Burial 77S-B/2.............................191 Figure 5.28:
Recommended publications
  • The Archaeology of Yucatán
    The Archaeology of YucatÁn Edited by Travis W. Stanton Archaeopress Pre-Columbian Archaeology 1 Archaeopress Gordon House 276 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7ED www.archaeopress.com ISBN 978 1 78491 008 2 ISBN 978 1 78491 009 9 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and the individual authors 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by CMP (UK) Ltd This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com Chapter 4 Xcoch: Home of Ancient Maya Rain Gods and Water Managers Nicholas P. Dunning, Eric Weaver, Michael P. Smyth, and David Ortegón Zapata “The water was in a deep, stony basin running under a shelf of overhanging rock…the sight of it was more welcome to us than gold or rubies.” (Stephens 1843:216) So wrote the American explorer John Lloyd Stephens surfaces and along lines of weakness created by fracturing after following local guides through a series of tortuously has created a landscape with radically varying drainage narrow and descending passageways in a cave system at and surface characteristics (Dunning et al. 1998). Drainage the ancient ruins of Xcoch, Yucatán. The deep cave at across most of the lowlands is primarily subterranean. Xcoch is clearly a place of ancient magic. Its entrance is Across the northern karst plains of the Yucatán peninsula, a hole at the bottom of a sinkhole – the “Xcoch Grotto” many sinkholes breach the water table (cenotes) providing – that yawns like the mouth of the Witz Monster of access to perennial water.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARCHEOLOGY of DEATH ANG 6191 (Section 4G20) ANT 4930 (Section 4G21) Fall 2020
    THE ARCHEOLOGY OF DEATH ANG 6191 (section 4G20) ANT 4930 (Section 4G21) Fall 2020 Instructor: Dr. James M. Davidson Course Level/Structure: seminar Time: Tuesdays -- periods 6 through 8 (12:50 – 3:50 pm) Classroom: none (online) Office: Turlington B134 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: by appointment Website for readings: Canvas Course Description and Objectives: The seminar’s goal is to provide a solid grounding in the anthropological literature of Mortuary studies; that is, data derived from a study of the Death experience. In addition to archaeological data, a strong emphasis will be placed on the theoretical underpinnings of mortuary data, drawn from cultural anthropology and ethnography. Along with more theoretical papers, specific case studies will be used to address a variety of topics and issues, such as Social Organization, Spirituality and Religion, Skeletal Biology (e.g., Paleodemography, Paleopathology, and other issues of Bioarchaeology), Gender Issues, the Ethics of using Human Remains, and Post-Processual Critiques. The time range that we will cover in the course will span from the Neolithic to the 20th century, and numerous cultures from all parts of the globe will be our subject matter. Course Requirements: Class participation/attendance 5% Leading Class Discussion: 5% Synopses (of specific readings) 20% Two essay/reaction papers 20% Major research paper 50% Texts: 1). Chapman, Robert (editor) 1981 The Archaeology of Death. Cambridge University Press. 2). Parker Pearson, Mike 1999 The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Texas A&M University Press. 3). The primary texts will be derived from individual readings (e.g., articles, book chapters) (see website) 1 Attendance: Regular attendance and participation in class discussions is a requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Correlating Biological
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Correlating Biological Relationships, Social Inequality, and Population Movement among Prehistoric California Foragers: Ancient Human DNA Analysis from CA-SCL-38 (Yukisma Site). A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology by Cara Rachelle Monroe Committee in charge: Professor Michael A. Jochim, Chair Professor Lynn Gamble Professor Michael Glassow Adjunct Professor John R. Johnson September 2014 The dissertation of Cara Rachelle Monroe is approved. ____________________________________________ Lynn H. Gamble ____________________________________________ Michael A. Glassow ____________________________________________ John R. Johnson ____________________________________________ Michael A. Jochim, Committee Chair September 2014 Correlating Biological Relationships, Social Inequality, and Population Movement among Prehistoric California Foragers: Ancient Human DNA Analysis from CA-SCL-38 (Yukisma Site). Copyright © 2014 by Cara Rahelle Monroe iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Completing this dissertation has been an intellectual journey filled with difficulties, but ultimately rewarding in unexpected ways. I am leaving graduate school, albeit later than expected, as a more dedicated and experienced scientist who has adopted a four field anthropological research approach. This was not only the result of the mentorships and the education I received from the University of California-Santa Barbara’s Anthropology department, but also from friends
    [Show full text]
  • Occ Papers #18 TEXT.Pdf (4.551Mb)
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS AT PUNTA DE CACAO, AN ANCIENT MAYA TOWN-SIZED SETTLEMENT IN ORANGE WALK DISTRICT, NORTHWEST BELIZE, CENTRAL AMERICA; THE UNIVERSITY OF THE INCARNATE WORD PROJECT, 2001-2004 Hubert R. Robichaux, Kristen Hartnett, Candace Pruett, Alexandra Miller The University of the Incarnate Word With a Contribution From: Fred Valdez, Jr. The University of Texas at Austin Occasional Papers, Number 18 Center for Archaeological and Tropical Studies The University of Texas at Austin 2015 OCCASIONAL PAPERS SERIES EDITORS Fred Valdez, Jr., The University of Texas at Austin David M. Hyde, Western State Colorado University Contents IN MEMORIAM ............................................................................................................ iii Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... v Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 A Regional Perspective of the Punta de Cacao Ceramic Complexes Fred Valdez, Jr. ................................................................................................... 11 Mapping Punta de Cacao ............................................................................................. 21 Excavations at Punta de Cacao .................................................................................... 29 The Central Precinct of Punta de Cacao ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Brenda J. Baker
    CURRICULUM VITAE BRENDA J. BAKER Associate Professor of Anthropology Center for Bioarchaeological Research School of Human Evolution & Social Change Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-2402 Phone: (480) 965-2087; Fax: (480) 965-7671; E-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION 1992 Ph.D. in Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Dissertation: Collagen Composition in Human Skeletal Remains from the NAX Cemetery (A.D. 350-550) in Lower Nubia. Doctoral committee chair: Dr. George J. Armelagos 1983 M.A. in Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. 1981 B.A. in Anthropology, with Honors, Northwestern University Honors thesis: A Bioarchaeological Analysis of N155-2: A Prehistoric Mortuary Structure from Nauvoo, lllinois. Advisor: Dr. Jane E. Buikstra PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS 2002-present Associate Professor, School of Human Evolution & Social Change (Department of Anthropology prior to 2005), Arizona State University. 1998-2002 Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University. 1994-1998 Senior Scientist (Bioarchaeology), Curator of Human Osteology and Director of Repatriation Program, Anthropological Survey, New York State Museum, Albany, NY. Developed research program concerning human skeletal remains in the museum's collections and in New York State; consulted on identification of human remains for other agencies (e.g., State Police); supervised staff and student interns in inventory work for the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA); oversaw budget and grants for NAGPRA and research projects; served on museum exhibit planning and collections committee; participated in public programming. 1995-1998 Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, SUNY. 1993-1994 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Moorhead State University, MN.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARCHEOLOGY of DEATH ANG6191 (Section 7964) Fall 2011
    THE ARCHEOLOGY OF DEATH ANG6191 (section 7964) Fall 2011 Instructor: Dr. James M. Davidson Course Level/Structure: Graduate seminar Time: Monday only -- periods 7 through 9 (1:55 pm to 4:55 pm) Class Room: MAT (Matherly Hall), Room 108 Office: Turlington B134 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Wed 1-3 (and by appointment) Website for electronic readings: http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/davidson/courses.htm Course Description and Objectives: The seminar’s goal is to provide a solid grounding in the anthropological literature of Mortuary studies; that is, data derived from a study of the Death Experience. In addition to archaeological data, a strong emphasis will be placed on the theoretical underpinnings of mortuary data, drawn from cultural anthropology and ethnography. Along with more theoretical papers, specific case studies will be used to address a variety of topics and issues, such as Social Organization and Social Structure, Spirituality and Religion, Skeletal Biology (e.g., Paleodemography, Paleopathology, and other issues of Bioarchaeology), Gender Issues, The Ethics of using Human Remains, and Post-Processual Critiques of Mortuary Archaeology. The time range that we will cover in the course will span from the Neolithic to the early 20th century, and numerous cultures from all parts of the globe will be our subject matter. Course Requirements: Class participation/attendance 5% Leading Class Discussion: 5% Synopses (of specific readings) 20% Two essay/reaction papers 20% Major research paper 50% Texts: 1). Chapman, Robert (editor) 1981 The Archaeology of Death. Cambridge University Press. 2). Parker Pearson, Mike 1999 The Archaeology of Death and Burial.
    [Show full text]
  • From Vision to Cosmovision: Memory and the Senses in the Creation of Maya Ritual Space
    From vision to cosmovision: Memory and the senses in the creation of Maya ritual space Lisa M. Johnson1, James M. Crandall2 and Lucas R. Martindale Johnson2 1Department of Anthropology University of California, Berkeley [email protected] 2 Department of Anthropology University of Florida, Gainesville; [email protected] [email protected] This article considers the role of ancient Maya ritual action of archaeological inquiry (see Houston and Taube 2000 and material engagement in constructing visible and for a discussion of an archaeology of the senses in ancient invisible social spaces. While the archaeological study of Mesoamerica). It is not our goal to recreate what the sensory human engagement with space is largely focused on the experiences were for individuals in the past, but rather, visible and material, it is the interpretation of the non- how the senses were engaged and how such engagements visual and immaterial aspects of space (i.e. experiential were made to endure both materially and as social practice. and sensual aspects) that present a particular challenge for Furthermore, how did these engagements recall the past in archaeologists. However, these challenges should not deter the present and influence the future through the production archaeologists from engaging in a thoughtful consideration of actions? It is through multiple sensory engagements and of how these spaces were experienced in the past through a the memories they evoke that spaces are made meaningful. sensual interaction with materials. In discussing seen and unseen spaces, we are not simply Recent scholarship regarding the place of ritual referring to the visible and invisible features of space, but practice and the act of ritualization in archaeological studies also the visual and non-visual perceptions of space.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Investigation of Late Prehistoric and Contact Period Plant Use in the North Carolina Piedmont
    AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF LATE PREHISTORIC AND CONTACT PERIOD PLANT USE IN THE NORTH CAROLINA PIEDMONT Sierra S. Roark A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology Chapel Hill 2020 Approved by: C. Margaret Scarry R.P. Stephen Davis Jr. Anna S. Agbe-Davies Dale L. Hutchinson © 2020 Sierra S. Roark ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Sierra S. Roark: “An Archaeological Investigation of Late Prehistoric and Contact Period Plant Use in the North Carolina Piedmont” (Under the direction of C. Margaret Scarry) The arrival of Europeans to North America spawned instability among Native populations. Past archaeological studies have worked to reconstruct Contact period human- environmental relationships, botanical usage, and subsistence patterns of Native Americans in the North Carolina Piedmont. That research largely emphasizes patterns of continuity regarding resource selection and subsistence patterns. In this study, I incorporate archaeobotanical data from 10 sites excavated across the Dan, Eno, and Haw River drainages and construct a nuanced depiction of Native botanical usage before and after establishing recurring contact with Europeans. My analysis supports previous observations that Native Piedmont groups had similar subsistence practices with observable differences across time and space. Additionally, I propose evidence for intensification in the use of medicinal taxa over time. I argue these lines of evidence demonstrate the maintenance of prehistoric Siouan practices. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I owe a great many debts to those who have helped me with this project. I would like to first thank my gracious advisor and committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancún, Cozumel & the Yucatán
    01_58796x_ffirs.qxd 7/20/05 6:57 PM Page i Cancún, Cozumel & the Yucatán 2006 by David Baird & Lynne Bairstow Here’s what the critics say about Frommer’s: “Amazingly easy to use. Very portable, very complete.” —Booklist “Detailed, accurate, and easy-to-read information for all price ranges.” —Glamour Magazine “Hotel information is close to encyclopedic.” —Des Moines Sunday Register “Frommer’s Guides have a way of giving you a real feel for a place.” —Knight Ridder Newspapers 01_58796x_ffirs.qxd 7/20/05 6:57 PM Page ii 01_58796x_ffirs.qxd 7/20/05 6:57 PM Page i Cancún, Cozumel & the Yucatán 2006 by David Baird & Lynne Bairstow Here’s what the critics say about Frommer’s: “Amazingly easy to use. Very portable, very complete.” —Booklist “Detailed, accurate, and easy-to-read information for all price ranges.” —Glamour Magazine “Hotel information is close to encyclopedic.” —Des Moines Sunday Register “Frommer’s Guides have a way of giving you a real feel for a place.” —Knight Ridder Newspapers 01_58796x_ffirs.qxd 7/20/05 6:57 PM Page ii Published by: Wiley Publishing, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774 Copyright © 2005 Wiley Publishing, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authoriza- tion through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978/750-8400, fax 978/646-8600.
    [Show full text]
  • The PARI Journal Vol. XX No. 2
    ThePARIJournal A quarterly publication of the Ancient Cultures Institute Volume XX, No. 2, Fall 2019 Dedicated to Yaxchilan from the Perspective of Guatemala: the memory of Michael D. Coe New Data on Settlement, Fortifications, (1929-2019) and Sculptural Monuments In This Issue: Yaxchilan from Andrew K. Scherer the Perspective of Charles Golden Guatemala: New Omar Alcover Firpi Data on Settlement, Whittaker Schroder Fortifications, and Sculptural Mónica Urquizú Monuments Edwin Román by Andrew K. Scherer In this paper we offer an update and the fantastical adventure story of Dana et al. synthesis of what is currently known re- and Ginger Lamb ([1951]1984). Embedded PAGES 1-14 garding the settlement, fortifications, and within this largely fictionalized account • monuments found in the portion of the were visits made by Dana Lamb and his Classic period Maya kingdom of Yaxchilan Mexican travel companions to a yet-un- Appreciating Mike: that lies within the modern borders of known site in Guatemala (likely to the east A Remembrance of Guatemala. The settlement, defenses, and or southeast of La Pasadita) that was the Michael D. Coe sculpture pertain primarily to the reigns of source of at least two looted monuments by Shield Jaguar III, Bird Jaguar IV, and Shield from the reign of Shield Jaguar IV that are Stephen Houston Jaguar IV, from c. AD 680–810 of the Late now held in private collections (Scherer et PAGES 15-27 Classic period. At this time the Yaxchilan al. 2017). Ian Graham (2010:453-467) was • rulers extended the physical borders of the first professional fieldworker to visit The Classic Mayan their kingdom to the north, west, and east and document Yaxchilan-affiliated sites in Causative into what is today the Sierra del Lacandon Guatemala.
    [Show full text]
  • Maya Osteobiographies of the Holmul Region, Guatemala
    BOSTON UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Dissertation MAYA OSTEOBIOGRAPHIES OF THE HOLMUL REGION, GUATEMALA: CURATING LIFE HISTORIES THROUGH BIOARCHAEOLOGY AND STABLE ISOTOPE ANALYSIS By AVIVA ANN CORMIER B.A., Brandeis University, 2009 M.A., Boston University, 2015 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2018 © 2018 by Aviva Ann Cormier All rights reserved Approved by First Reader David M. Carballo, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Archaeology Second Reader Jonathan Bethard, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Anthropology University of South Florida Third Reader Jane E. Buikstra, Ph.D. Regents’ Professor Arizona State University DEDICATION To my family, my mother, and Chad. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The completion of this dissertation and this stage of my academic journey would not have been possible without so many individuals and institutions. Thank you to my committee- David Carballo, Mac Marston, Jon Bethard, and Jane Buikstra- for their invaluable guidance and advice. Without their patience, encouragement, and inspiration, this dissertation would not have been possible. David and Mac, thank you for welcoming me as your student and providing me with endless support. Jon, thank you for being my mentor and friend and for teaching me the ways of the Dremel. Thank you, Jane, for introducing me to Kampsville and inspiring me to be a better bioarchaeologist. I also wish to thank Bill Saturno for welcoming me to BU and guiding me through the challenging start of my academic career. Thank you, Francisco Estrada-Belli, for the opportunity to work with the Holmul Archaeological Project and your support of my work both in Guatemala and in Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Survey at Chichen Itza
    ARCHITECTURAL SURVEY AT CHICHEN ITZA George F. Andrews University of Oregon 1 z SITE: CHICHEN ITZA NUMBER; 16Qd(9):l DATE: 1991 BACKGROUND Although Chichen Itza is assumed to have been seen by the Spanish conquistadores as early as 1528 and several of its buildings were described by Bishop Landa (1566), its history as far as architecture is concerned properly begins with Stephens' and Catherwood's visit to the site in 1842. They were followed by Charnay (1860, 1882), LePlongeon (1879, etc.), Maudslay (1889-1902, 1906, 1910), Breton (1900-1904), and E. Seler (t^iT ). Commencing in the early 19205, the Carnegie Institution of Washington initiated a series of excavation and restoration projects at the site which involved a large number of individuals, including Jean Chariot, S.G. Morley, Earl Morris, Karl Ruppert, P.S. Martin, Gustav Stromsvik, J.R. Bolles, R.T. Smith, Oliver Ricketson, H.E.D. Pollock, J.E.S. Thompson, George Vaillant, and R. Wauchop. Overlapping with the work of this group were a number of restoration projects carried out under the auspices of INAH, Mexico. More recent studies have been carried out by Thompson (1945), Ruppert (1952), Tozzer (1957), Cohodas (1978), Lincoln (1986) and others. I first visited the site in 1960 but the bulk of my architectural data was recorded in 1973, 1981, and 1983. Because the present report is concerned primarily with the architecture at Chichen Itza, the references cited above do not include the names of those who have focussed their attention on the art, ceramics, "Toltec" and/or "Itza" historical relationships, and other areas of specialization.
    [Show full text]