Robert Maynard Hutchins

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Robert Maynard Hutchins VOLUME III, NO. 49 DECEMBER 6, 1950 MEN WITH IDEAS: ROBERT MAYNARD HUTCHINS IT is generally believed that Dr. Robert M. education with almost anybody—getting in a few Hutchins, Chancellor of the University of licks on the nature of man whenever possible. Chicago, has been engaged in a great controversy And it is really his statements about the nature of about Education—what it is, and what it ought to man which get him into trouble with his be—ever since 1929 when he left his post of Dean colleagues in education. of the Yale Law School to become President of Dr. Hutchins believes—along with Plato and the University of Chicago. Dr. Hutchins and his Aristotle—that man is a rational animal. various supporters, and his various antagonists, it ("Animal," in this case, does not mean a Darwin- is true, speak and write a great deal about Huxley-and-Haeckel kind of animal, red in tooth education, but it seems a good idea to propose, in and claw, and lately emerged from the primeval the interest of clarity, that the real argument jungle, but a Greek kind of "animal." You could between them is not primarily about Education, say that when Aristotle used the phrase, "rational but about the Nature of Man. animal," he meant a "soul-that-thinks," for the After all, what you think is the proper philosophers of the Greek tradition of metaphysics education for a human being ought to be held that there are many kinds of souls—humans determined by what you think a human being is. being rational souls.) Thus Dr. Hutchins, Conceivably, Dr. Hutchins will approve our effort regarding the human essence as a reasoning to set the argument about education in a new essence, also believes that education is first of all context, in the interest of education itself, as well an appeal to reason. Education may involve other as in the interest of clarity. He might even prefer things, but basically it is an appeal to reason, and to argue about the nature of man with his there is no education without an appeal to reason. intellectual and academic opposition, and would, It may be that one explanation of why Dr. perhaps, so argue, if he could get the opposition Hutchins has been so bitterly attacked in some to enter the arena on this basis. The trouble with quarters is that he demands that people reason this, of course, is that Dr. Hutchins, along with with him about education, and he is a pretty good Plato, is more or less alone in holding that the reasoner. Reasoning, moreover, is difficult. It nature of man is something that can be discussed requires, as he so often tells us, discipline of the intelligibly. He believes that once a measure of mind. A man who believes in reason and tries to working unity on this subject has been established, practice the life of reason can never disregard the the discussion may go on to the "practical" strenuous requirements of impartial thinking. But problems of education, such as how to improve a man who does not believe in reason, or who man's natural endowments, or, at least, how to believes in reason only some of the time, and provide the conditions for their optimum when it is convenient to his argument, can always development and use. But unless there are others call the whole discussion off at any point by who think that the nature of man is a subject with claiming that that "point" rests upon a higher sufficient unity to be discussed, how can you authority than reason. Dr. Hutchins always replies develop a useful argument about it? that every point must make its peace with This, really, is Dr. Hutchins' dilemma. He has reason—that, whatever the facts are, we still have had to argue about education as a kind of second- to live our lives as whole men, to reason our way best topic for debate you can start an argument on through decisions as moral intelligences, and that MANAS Reprint - LEAD ARTICLE 2 any "point" or "fact" which interferes with this While it has not yet made the list of the Hundred task must either be abandoned or made amenable Great Books, it perhaps ought to, for a book to reason. And this is the argument that the which can persuade thousands of people to begin specialists of departmentalized learning resist and to read the Hundred Great Books, and to meet resent. with other people to discuss what they contain, comes very close to being a Great Book itself. Dr. Hutchins made his first major declaration of faith in 1936, with publication of The Higher Dr. Hutchins is a man with ideas—the great Learning in America, after he had been President ideas in the great books—and he is also a man of the University of Chicago for seven years. The with a program. Through his connection with the following paragraph from this book reveals his University of Chicago, and with the help of others, central interest and purpose: he started the Great Books Foundation, devoted If we can secure a real university in this country to assisting local discussion groups that read and and a real program of general education upon which investigate the meaning of the Great Books. its work can rest, it may be that the character of our There are now some 35,000 active participants in civilization may slowly change. It may be that we Great Books Seminars throughout the United can outgrow the love of money, that we can get a States. It is fashionable, in some educational saner conception of democracy, and we can even circles, to exhibit a contemptuous or superior understand the purposes of democracy. It may be that we can abandon our false notions of progress and attitude toward the Great Books program, the utility and that we can come to prefer intelligible reason given being that it is not a program for "the organization to the chaos we mistake for liberty. It is masses." There could be no greater mistake. It is because these things may be that education is true that the Great Books are not for people who important. Upon education our country must pin its are not hungry for knowledge, but it should be hopes of true progress, which involves scientific and technological advance, but under the direction of added that no one ever got any kind of an reason; of true prosperity, which includes external education without being hungry for knowledge. goods but does not overlook those of the soul; and of Actually, Dr. Hutchins is the Nation's most true liberty which can exist only in society, and in a society rationally ordered. vocal opponent of the division of students into the masses and the classes. Here is his comment on a What will such an education be based upon? prevalent view of the educational needs of Dr Hutchins proposes that "a real program of American youth: general education" would start with . in the report of the President's Commission those books which have through the centuries on Higher Education, presented by men who have the attained to the dimensions of classics. Many such deepest democratic convictions, we are urged in the books, I am afraid are in the ancient and medieval name of democracy upon a course that divides the period. But even these are contemporary. A classic population into the mass and the elite. The mass, we is a book that is contemporary in every age. That is are told, since they are not really capable of being why it is a classic. The conversations of Socrates educated, should not be allowed to clutter up existing raise questions that are as urgent today as they were educational institutions. Two-year community when Plato wrote. In fact they are more so, because colleges will be established for them. They should go the society in which Plato lived did not need to have to these colleges because everybody should go to them raised as much as we do. school as long as possible. But they should not be This is what Dr. Hutchins believes, what he educated because they are not capable of it. The two- year community is therefore a kind of waiting room, teaches and practices. We shall not say much or housing project, in which the young are to be kept more about The Higher Learning in America, out of worse places until we are ready to have them except that it is at least a fourteen-year-old classic go to work. on education, for it is still very contemporary. Volume III, No. 49 MANAS Reprint December 6, 1950 3 The doctrine that educational opportunity should The determination of which facts are of primary be open to all is the great American contribution to importance is a function of reason. Nor is there the theory and practice of education. But you will any reliance upon irrational authority. Authority notice that the opportunity that should be open is educational opportunity, not the opportunity to spend which is arrived at by means of reason is the only two years doing anything that occurs to you in a place authority which all men can learn to respect in erroneously denominated a college. The advocates of common. As Dr. Hutchins wrote in The Higher the two-year community college either keep silent Learning: altogether about what its curriculum is to be or say that it is to be whatever the students would like to .
Recommended publications
  • SOCRATES in the CLASSROOM Rationales and Effects of Philosophizing with Children Ann S
    SOCRATES IN THE CLASSROOM Rationales and Effects of Philosophizing with Children Ann S. Pihlgren Socrates in the Classroom Rationales and Effects of Philosophizing with Children Ann S. Pihlgren Stockholm University ©Ann S. Pihlgren, Stockholm 2008 Cover: Björn S. Eriksson ISSN 1104-1625-146 ISBN (978-91-7155-598-4) Printed in Sweden by Elanders Sverige AB Distributor: Stockholm University, Department of Education To Kjell with love and gratitude. Contents Contents ........................................................................................................ vii Preface ............................................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 3 1.1 Philosophizing and teaching ethics ..................................................................... 4 1.2 Some guidance for the reader ............................................................................ 5 1.3 Considerations ................................................................................................... 8 2 Research Goals and Design .................................................................. 9 2.1 Classroom interaction ......................................................................................... 9 2.2 Studying Socratic interaction ............................................................................ 10 2.3 Research questions .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Maynard Hutchins, 1899-1977
    The Yale Law Journal Volume 86, Number 8, July 1977 Robert Maynard Hutchins, 1899-1977 Herbert Brownellt Robert Maynard Hutchins, who died at Santa Barbara, California, on May 15, 1977, was Dean of the Yale Law School in 1928-29. He had served as Secretary of Yale University from 1923 to 1927. Upon his graduation from the Yale Law School in 1925, he joined the Law School's faculty as a Lecturer, a position he held from 1925 to 1927. He was Acting Dean of the Law School during the academic year 1927-28. Dean Hutchins was thirty years old when he left the Law School to become President and later Chancellor of the University of Chicago. Dean Hutchins' active leadership in the field of legal education during this brief span of years was notable for the innovations he sponsored in the Law School's curriculum and in particular for the establishment of the Institute of Human Relations. His erudition, his inquisitive mind, and his theories of proper relationships among law, economics, political science, and psychology left an indelible im- print upon the Yale Law School of his time. His initiatives, more- over, led to fruitful interdisciplinary research programs that have had lasting effects upon legal education in this country. The main endeavors of Dean Hutchins' career, and his publicly known achievements, came in later years while he was a founder, Chief Executive Officer, and President of the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, based in California. But many of the in- gredients of his brilliant intellectual success first came to light during his deanship at the Yale Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Unrestrained Growth in Facilities for Athletes: Where Is the Outrage?
    Unrestrained Growth in Facilities for Athletes: Where is the Outrage? September 17, 2008 By Frank G. Splitt "It requires no tabulation of statistics to prove that the young athlete who gives himself up for months, to training under a professional coach for a grueling contest, staged to focus the attention of thousands of people, and upon which many thousands of dollars will be staked, will find no time or energy for serious intellectual effort. The compromises that have to be made to keep such a student in the college and to pass them through to a degree give an air of insincerity to the whole university-college regime." 1 —Henry Smith Pritchett, Former MIT President (1900-1906) and President of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1906-1930). Sol Gittleman, a former provost at Tufts University, wrote to me with reference to Brad Wolverton’s recent article, “Rise in Fancy Academic Centers for Athletes Raises Questions of Fairness,”2 saying: "This would be a joke, if it weren't for articles that state how public universities are losing out in hiring to the well-heeled privates. So, while faculty flee to the private sector, the public universities build these Xanadus for athletes. Have we lost our minds? Where are the presidents?” Re: Dr. Gittleman’s first question: Have we lost our minds?—Based on the sad state of affairs in America’s system of higher education, it would certainly seem so, but there is no way to prove it as yet. However, taking a queue from Henry Pritchett, it requires no tabulation of statistics to prove that America’s system of higher education has been reeling under the negative impact of over commercialized college sports.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PHILOSOPHY of GENERAL EDUCATION and ITS CONTRADICTIONS: the INFLUENCE of HUTCHINS Anne H. Stevens in February 1999, Universi
    THE PHILOSOPHY OF GENERAL EDUCATION AND ITS CONTRADICTIONS: THE INFLUENCE OF HUTCHINS Anne H. Stevens In February 1999, University of Chicago president Hugo Sonnen- schein held a meeting to discuss his proposals for changes in un- dergraduate enrollment and course requirements. Hundreds of faculty, graduate students, and undergraduates assembled in pro- test. An alumni organization declared a boycott on contributions until the changes were rescinded. The most frequently cited com- plaint of the protesters was the proposed reduction of the “com- mon core” curriculum. The other major complaint was the proposed increase in the size of the undergraduate population from 3,800 to 4,500 students. Protesters argued that a reduction in re- quired courses would alter the unique character of a Chicago edu- cation: “such changes may spell a dumbing down of undergraduate education, critics say” (Grossman & Jones, 1999). At the meet- ing, a protestor reportedly yelled out, “Long live Hutchins! (Grossman, 1999). Robert Maynard Hutchins, president of the University from 1929–1950, is credited with establishing Chicago’s celebrated core curriculum. In Chicago lore, the name Hutchins symbolizes a “golden age” when requirements were strin- gent, administrators benevolent, and students diligent. Before the proposed changes, the required courses at Chicago amounted to one half of the undergraduate degree. Sonnenschein’s plan, even- tually accepted, would have reduced requirements from twenty- one to eighteen quarter credits by eliminating a one-quarter art or music requirement and by combining the two-quarter calculus re- quirement with the six quarter physical and biological sciences requirement. Even with these reductions, a degree from Chicago would still have involved as much or more general education courses than most schools in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Robert Maynard Hutchins Papers 1884-2000
    University of Chicago Library Guide to the Robert Maynard Hutchins Papers 1884-2000 © 2014 University of Chicago Library Table of Contents Descriptive Summary 4 Information on Use 4 Access 4 Restrictions on Use 4 Citation 4 Biographical Note 5 Scope Note 7 Related Resources 9 Subject Headings 10 INVENTORY 11 Series I: Personal 11 Subseries 1: General 11 Subseries 2: Biographical 13 Series II: Correspondence 15 Series III: Subject Files 208 Series IV: Yale University 212 Series V: University of Chicago 213 Subseries 1: General 213 Subseries 2: Publicity 218 Series VI: Encyclopædia Britannica 228 Subseries 1: General 228 Subseries 2: Correspondence 235 Subseries 3: Board of Editors 241 Subseries 4: Content Development 244 Series VII: Commission on Freedom of the Press 252 Series VIII: Committee to Frame a World Constitution 254 Series IX: Ford Foundation, Fund for the Republic, and Center for Study of Democratic256 Institutions Subseries 1: Administrative 256 Subseries 2: Programs and Events 261 Series X: Writings 267 Subseries 1: General 269 Subseries 2: Books 270 Subseries 3: Articles 275 Sub-subseries 1: Articles 275 Sub-subseries 2: Correspondence 294 Subseries 4: Speeches 297 Subseries 5: Engagements 339 Series XI: Honors and Awards 421 Series XII: Audiovisual 424 Series XIII: Books 436 Series XIV: Oversize 439 Series XV: Restricted 440 Subseries 1: Financial and Personnel Information 441 Subseries 2: Student Information 441 Descriptive Summary Identifier ICU.SPCL.HUTCHINSRM Title Hutchins, Robert Maynard. Papers Date 1884-2000 Size 238.5 linear feet (465 boxes) Repository Special Collections Research Center University of Chicago Library 1100 East 57th Street Chicago, Illinois 60637 U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Faculty Address-2017
    A Ressourcement Vision for Graduate Theological Education Academic Faculty Address-2017 Thomas A. Baima Mundelein Seminary August 11, 2017 I want to welcome everyone to the first of our Academic Faculty meetings for the 2017- 2018 school year. I hope all of you had a refreshing summer. This meeting is the result of comments by some of you that the academic department did not have the same opportunity as the formation department for planning and interaction. It is for this reason that I added this morning to the meetings at the opening of the school year. We do need time to work together as a group on the common project of seminary education. Those of you who are more senior will remember that we used to meet for two full days at the opening of the school year and again at the opening of the beginning of the new year. Without those meetings, we have lost much of the time we used to work together. So, I hope this morning will restore some of that, and at the same time not wear everyone out. Here is my plan for the morning. First, I’m going to do some introductions of our new members. Next, I want to offer some remarks about the vision of higher education. I do this because the academic department is entrusted with the responsibility for the intellectual pillars and shares responsibility for the pastoral pillar 1 with Formation. As such, we are part of the larger higher education enterprise both of this country and of the Catholic Church internationally.
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUVENT RESUME ED 286 394 HE 020 596 AUTHOR Mcarthur, Benjamin Revisiting Hutchins and "The Higher Learning in America.&Qu
    DOCUVENT RESUME ED 286 394 HE 020 596 AUTHOR McArthur, Benjamin TITLE Revisiting Hutchins and "The Higher Learning in America." PUB DATE Apr 87 NOTE 31p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Washington, DC, April 20-24, 1987). Several pages may not reproduce well because they contain light print. PUB TYPE Historical Materials (060) -- Speeches/Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Citizenship; *Civil Liberties; *College Presidents; College Role; *Educational Change; *Educational History; Higher Education; *Liberal Arts IDENTIFIERS *Hutchins (Robert) ABSTRACT The career of Robert Maynard Hutchins and hiz 1936 book, "The Higher Learning in America," which addressed the college liberal arts curriculum, are discussed. Hutchins was a controversial university president in the 1930s and 1940s. He is normally remembered as an Aristotelian and a champion of civil liberties, the Great Books, and adult education. Hutchins's undergraduate work was done at Oberlin College and Yale University, and he received his law degree from Yale. He served as a lecturer and dean of the Yale Law School and was a successful fund raiser in a number of posts. He was an administrator at age 21 and at age 30 he became president of the University of Chicago, where he had a 22-year tenure. During Hutchin's second career, he served at the Ford Foundation's Fund for the Republic, which was devoted to the study of American freedom and civil liberties. He was the founder of the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions at Santa Barbara. His book, "The Higher Learning in America," advocated that college learning should be pervasively intellectual rather than a means to develop character or prepare for a vocation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Way Forward: Educational Leadership and Strategic Capital By
    The Way Forward: Educational Leadership and Strategic Capital by K. Page Boyer A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education (Educational Leadership) at the University of Michigan-Dearborn 2016 Doctoral Committee: Professor Bonnie M. Beyer, Chair LEO Lecturer II John Burl Artis Professor M. Robert Fraser Copyright 2016 by K. Page Boyer All Rights Reserved i Dedication To my family “To know that we know what we know, and to know that we do not know what we do not know, that is true knowledge.” ~ Nicolaus Copernicus ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Bonnie M. Beyer, Chair of my dissertation committee, for her probity and guidance concerning theories of school administration and leadership, organizational theory and development, educational law, legal and regulatory issues in educational administration, and curriculum deliberation and development. Thank you to Dr. John Burl Artis for his deep knowledge, political sentience, and keen sense of humor concerning all facets of educational leadership. Thank you to Dr. M. Robert Fraser for his rigorous theoretical challenges and intellectual acuity concerning the history of Christianity and Christian Thought and how both pertain to teaching and learning in America’s colleges and universities today. I am indebted to Baker Library at Dartmouth College, Regenstein Library at The University of Chicago, the Widener and Houghton Libraries at Harvard University, and the Hatcher Graduate Library at the University of Michigan for their stewardship of inestimably valuable resources. Finally, I want to thank my family for their enduring faith, hope, and love, united with a formidable sense of humor, passion, optimism, and a prodigious ability to dream.
    [Show full text]
  • The Five Roles of Robert Hutchins
    DePaul Law Review Volume 42 Issue 2 Winter 1992 Article 9 The Five Roles of Robert Hutchins Jeffrey O'Connell Thomas E. O'Connell Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Jeffrey O'Connell & Thomas E. O'Connell, The Five Roles of Robert Hutchins, 42 DePaul L. Rev. 835 (1992) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol42/iss2/9 This Book Reviews is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FIVE ROLES OF ROBERT HUTCHINS Unseasonable Truths: The Life of Robert Maynard Hutchins. By Harry S. Ashmore. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. 1989. Pp. 616. $27.50. Reviewed by Jeffrey O'Connell* and Thomas E. O'Connell** INTRODUCTION Robert M. Hutchins never intended to practice law. In 1920, at the end of his junior year at Yale, he turned to the study of law only because he found the rest of his Yale studies to be "an intellectual dead end."' Only seven years later, at the age of twenty-eight, he was appointed dean of the Yale Law School2 and two years after that he became president of the University of Chicago. Thereafter, the only interest in the law as a profession he ever displayed was typically self-confident: after ten years at Chicago he aspired to a United States Supreme Court appointment.' This is not to say Hutchins did not retain any interest in the law.
    [Show full text]
  • A Publication of the University of Chicago Divinity School
    V O L U M E 4 8 N U M B E R 1 C RitERiON A Publication of the University of Chicago Divinity School W i N t E R 2 0 1 1 Dear Alumni and Friends — C RitERiON e open the Winter 2011 issue of Criterion with Robert M. Franklin’s 2010 Alumnus of V olume 4 8 | number 1 the Year Lecture, “Nurturing Citizens through Liberal Arts Education: Reflections on Dr. King’s Unpublished Papers,” 1 Contents & List of Contributors Wpresented at Swift Hall on April 29, 2010. in his talk, Frank- lin, the tenth president of Morehouse College, contem- 2 Nurturing Citizens through plates the ties between leading figures at Morehouse Liberal Arts Education College and the University of Chicago, the educational philosophies underpinning both institutions, and the Reflections on Dr. King’s current challenges facing liberal education. Unpublished Papers Next is “Scriptural Conflict, Scriptural Community: Robert M. Franklin Robert M. Franklin David Nirenberg is Judaism, Christianity, islam,” by David Nirenberg, the Div- is the President of the Deborah R. and inity School’s John Nuveen Lecturer for 2009. His public Morehouse College 18 Edgar D. Jannotta address discusses the interpretative strategies employed by and the Divinity Scriptural Conflict, Professor of Medieval School’s Alumnus Scriptural Community History and Social Christian, Jewish, and islamic communities, and reminds of the Year for 2010. Thought at the Uni- us that scriptural traditions invite and generate variant Judaism, Christianity, islam versity of Chicago. readings, and that “the people have the power” to reshape David Nirenberg meaning. This issue concludes with Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections, 2016-2021
    REFLECTIONS, 2016-2021 The Sequel to AN ODYSSEY OF REFORM INITIATIVES, 1986-2015 Frank G. Splitt Copyright 2021 by Frank G, Splitt All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission. Copy editing by Margaret Mangan, Jennifer Heitz, and Judy Janowiak. Photo editing by Jennifer Heitz, Anne Rassas, and Elizabeth Scott. Printed by Copy Cat, 8626 Hwy 51, Minocqua, Wisconsin 54548 and UPS, 119 S. Emerson Avenue, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Because of changing circumstances and the dynamic nature of the Internet, some Web addresses or links contained in this book may have changed since the original publication of the material in this collection and may no longer be valid. Published by FutureVectors, Inc. 710 S. William Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 The PDF for this book can be accessed at www.futurevectors.com ISBN 978-1-63901-414-9 DEDICATION This sequel to the Odyssey book is dedicated to the memory of General Andrew Jackson Goodpaster, 1915-2005, a soldier, engineer, and scholar who fought with uncommon valor in World War II, advised several presidents, and came out of retirement to serve as the superintendent of West Point. He is an example of a truly enlightened military intellectual who used his considerable talents in the service of his country. His life story now serves as an inspiration to others who are challenged with the task of resolving complex domestic and foreign policy issues. He is also one of my heroes as well as a second cousin—sharing our Polish great grandmother, Katarzyna Pytlic, the mother of Anna Pytlic Splitt, my paternal .grandmother.
    [Show full text]
  • Tribute to Professor Leon Gabinet
    Case Western Reserve Law Review Volume 65 Issue 1 Article 4 2014 Tribute to Professor Leon Gabinet Erik M. Jensen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Erik M. Jensen, Tribute to Professor Leon Gabinet, 65 Case W. Rsrv. L. Rev. 4 (2014) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol65/iss1/4 This Tribute is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Law Review by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Case Western Reserve Law Review·Volume 65·Issue 1·2014 Erik M. Jensen† Tax maven Leon Gabinet is one of the extraordinary folks brought to the Case Western Reserve University School of Law in the late ’60s (the 1860s, the 1960s, what does it matter?) by dean, and later university president, Lou Toepfer. The rest is history—and, for a man of advanced years, much of it ancient history. Like good bourbon, however, Leon has aged well. Leon was born in 1927 in Poland, where, as they say in the American South, things were po1—hence, I assume, the name of the country. At an early age, he came with his family to the United States—to Chicago—bringing with him his knowledge of Polish.2 As most Illinoisans did at the time, Leon lived in a log cabin, split logs, gathered berries, used his slingshot to put an occasional squirrel on the table,3 and .
    [Show full text]