DOCSLIB.ORG

Irish Maritime Directorate Strategy - Public Consultation Submissions by Recipient

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Irish Maritime Directorate Strategy - Public Consultation Submissions by Recipient Irish Maritime Directorate Strategy - Public Consultation Submissions by Recipient 1. Commander John Jordan Received 13 November 2020 Dear Sir, From 1952 to 2000 I served on Irish and British Merchant ships, including 32 years in the Irish naval Service, and finally 8 years mainly with Commissioners of Irish Lights and some with Dundalk shipping and British and Irish Containers on MV Wicklow. I would have entered and used all Irish Ports except Wicklow, Dundalk ,Drogheda and Sligo. In Naval days I was liaison officer to the Survey and charting for Burtonport Fishery harbour and served in command of 5 naval ships. Comments Core 1. In the overall our response to Maritime safety is reactive as we have NO hands on 24/7 view, or control of maritime traffic. With the loss of manned lighthouses and reliance only on Radio channels in competition with Cell and satellite phones there has been a loss of the Surface Picture and of discipline among users. Most busy sea traffic areas, other than Ireland, are now controlled and interrogated by VTS . Recent incidences offshore and over the years has shown our weaknesses in the event of ship breakdowns that culminate in towage and/or rescue. There are no dedicated Emergency Towage vessels. Regulations will not solve or provide a solution to an actual incident. Core 2. Some of our Ports are in planned disarray. There is a certain loss of control in that traditional town based berthage is being repurposed as development lands while linear losses of berthage, are not being met at down river sites. It is commercially untidy, and unsightly, to have Bulk, Container, Timber, Miscellaneous, and passenger vessel traffic packed into the same harbour area. From a naval point of view, no harbour has suitable access berths for visiting ships especially the larger foreign vessels. In the overall harbour Boards often provide facilities for special cargos that have no longevity and impose costs to repurpose. Our biggest shame is the loss of our own flag ships and our deep sea tonnage with a consequential loss of independence. Tiering ports is a means of perpetuating the non-development of existing small ports or building new ones. We need a clear estimate of linear and depth requirements for multipurpose ports and we need to resurrect our ability to provide repair facilities for all our port users including vessels up 250/300 metres length. The Naval Service alone would need 700metres of berthage to put all their fleet alongside individual berths. Lastly in the green age it is now a necessity to provide all ships with shore power to run all services and shut down diesels in harbour. Core 3. Again effective response requires obvious assets and manpower. Their is the need for aircraft for patrol and top cover, Intervention surface craft and helicopters with ranges perhaps to 350/400nm. Vessels capable of towing up to cruise liner sizes. Vessels capable of dealing with an oil pollution, or chemical pollution incident at sea. Core 4. The initial requirement is to ensure that all vessels entering harbour have a waste handling system on board. That there is a system available in harbour to handle ballast water, waste oils, ship rubbish/dunnage, and domestic waste from ships. Fuelling ships should be notified and supervised for safety measures before and after fuelling. Inspection is key, including maritime flights looking for pollution at sea. The remaining matters are organisational, the bigger challenges are providing the infrastructure and not allowing preferences to misplace urgent needs to attract traffic, and Industry by increasing all ports capacities. regards John Jordan 2. Leslie O' Hora, Past President, Glenans Ireland sector Received 13 November 2020 Dear sirs. The idea if an island nation without a sail training vessal is appalling. It's some years now since the Asgard sunk and its subsequent insurance payout As a national training vessal, the Asgard proved in its lifetime to be a vital part of breaking down barriers amongst to youth in our society as well as teaching them maritime skills and a love of offshore nature. Surely now is the time to replace her when the youth of Ireland need to live full lives again following the pandemic. It's worth noting that Les centre nautique des Glenans was founded after the second world war to nuture French youth who had lived through those turbulent times. Your sincerely Leslie O Hora 3. Maurice Fitzgerald Received 14 November 2020 I, Maurice Fitzgerald, XXXXXXXXX, make the following submission in relation to a public consultation on the Development of a Strategy for the Irish Maritime Directorate. Core Objective 1: Enhance Maritime Safety through effective regulation, implementation and compliance. Recommendations for inclusion in Maritime Strategy: 1. Develop a roadmap which includes priority legislative requirements at international, domestic and EU level. The roadmap should be risk based on priorities having regard to deadlines for implementation of EU legislation, the configuration of the Irish fleet and an analysis of ships calling at Irish Ports. Answer: Our naval service in addition to the coast guard is only a paltry token force. Any road map would need strong enforcement – otherwise legislative improvements would be a moot progression. We would need a far bigger enforcement mechanism for any legislation to be effective. A maritime traffic control system could also be established at EU level if it hasn't already, however all vessels would have to have a transponder, like aircraft. 2. Establish a methodology to ensure effective implementation and enforcement of relevant international mandatory instruments. Answer: Again, we only have a tiny token maritime enforcement mechanism and any effectiveness would have to come about with a much larger fleet of vessels. 3. Ensure reporting requirements are met with regard to the implementation of international conventions. Answer: no answer. 4. Promote greater communication with all relevant stakeholders on legislative and regulatory developments impacting on the sector. Answer: Every vessel in our waters should have access to a Departmental website where all relevant maritime laws and regulations are available. All vessels should be registered, pleasure craft included. Registration should mean that owners of such vessels understand their obligations. The coastguard could also publish television and radio ads providing information to sea goers. 5. Provide for enhanced engagement with international organisations such as IMO, ILO, EU Commission and EMSA to ensure Ireland’s interests are represented and ensure early input into the development of legislation impacting the maritime sector. Answer: Set up an international telecommunication mechanism with audio and visual links for discussions, with language services if necessary. Core Objective 2: Facilitate Maritime Trade and Connectivity Recommendations for inclusion in Maritime Strategy: 1. Ensure the appropriate policy framework is in place so that ports are enabled to provide, in a timely manner, the necessary capacity to meet the needs of the economy. Answer: We must make sure that any port development is not conflicting with residents interests, such as Ringaskiddy in Cork, where port development has been allowed to come extremely near residents homes. Port development must also make sure that port facilities do not take precedence over recreational areas which are vital in promoting people's health. Planning must be careful in not damaging residential areas when ports are developed. New ports away from residential areas could also be built. We seem to be getting carried away with existing natural ports and not looking to build new ones, which would allow more flexibility in design and increase this country's connectivity. 2. Enhance Ireland’s maritime connectivity by exploring the development of a policy framework that supports the creation of new routes and services. Answer: There are apparently no transatlantic passenger routes by sea. We have concentrated on European connectivity; chiefly Britain and France. This very narrow position needs to change. Discussion should begin with far more countries about bringing passenger services far beyond where they are now – which is only token. We have really failed to exploit our island national which is very sea accessible. 3. Promote the adoption across the maritime transport sector and agencies of emerging technologies to improve performance, economic competitiveness and sustainability. Answer: Every maritime vessel should have an email address. Delays and uncertainty in giving and receiving information cost money. 4. Explore the options available to DOT that would further promote and facilitate the development of Offshore Renewable Energy projects. Answer: This question needs more definition and is hard to answer. Our energy needs should not be that great with a small population and we should not get caught up in inter-country rat race to provide cheaper power to the EU grid. Core Objective 3: Deliver an effective Emergency Response (SAR and maritime casualty & pollution response) Recommendations for inclusion in Maritime Strategy: 1. Ensure an efficient and effective SAR coordination and response service in the Irish Search and Rescue Region, along the coasts and cliffs of Ireland, on inland waterways for which responsibility is assigned to IRCG, and in support of An Garda Síochána on major inland lakes and remote areas. Answer: Water safety is not taken as seriously as it should in this country and we are without doubt some of the most accident prone people in the world. Fishermen are a common casualty, who risk the lives in rough and dangerous seas unnecessarily – so they can beat their rivals. Maritime law should allow the government to ban vessels from going to sea by government directive on radio and television. Prevention is better than cure. Cliffs and other remote areas should have warning signs clearly posted for those who want to take unnecessary risks. 2. Provide strategic coordination, guidance and leadership for Ireland’s National SAR system as part of the National SAR Committee (NSARC), report to the Minister for Transport on an annual basis and address specific issues that may arise.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oil and Gas News Briefs, December 28, 2020
    Oil and Gas News Briefs Compiled by Larry Persily December 28, 2020 LNG producers risk overinvesting in too much new supply (The Wall Street Journal; Dec. 24) - As a cleaner fossil fuel, natural gas will play a role for years to come. It is less certain, however, that it will be a profitable one. Exuberant investment in new reserves and liquefaction facilities in recent years helped globalize the LNG market but also created a supply glut. Any sustained recovery in prices and profits will require producers to resist the temptation to overinvest once again. Future profitability will depend on how well supply and demand match up. Natural gas will likely play two key roles in the upcoming green transition: replacing coal-fired power plants until sufficient renewables production can be built; and fueling backup peak plants to bridge the gaps in intermittent wind and solar generation. Gas demand is expected to peak sometime in the next decade or two and then taper off slowly, though advances in carbon capture and storage could extend its role. On the other hand, gas demand could be reduced by a faster-than-expected fall in costs for renewable energy and storage, or an accelerated development of green hydrogen. The uncertainty makes it tricky to estimate what supply will be needed in the future, particularly as projects can take years to come online. This raises the risk of overproduction, which can cause prices to languish. Decisions to invest during the next two years could lead to another “wave of supplies” coming online in 2027, prompting another downward price cycle, said Carlos Torres Diaz, gas and power analyst at energy consultancy Rystad Energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Port Industry Terminology
    Glossary of Port Industry Terminology Berth: 1) The area allotted to accommodate a vessel alongside a wharf, or the area in which a vessel swings when at anchor. 2) Or in “cruise terminology ” a bed. Berthage: A tariff charged to a vessel occupying a berth. It is calculated by applying the current tariff rate per GT for each of the first 2 twelve-hour periods. Each additional hour is charged at a lower published rate per GT. Bollard: Is a short vertical post used on a ship or a quay, principally for mooring. Breakbulk: Non-containerized general cargo. Examples include iron, steel, machinery, linerboard, woodpulp and yachts. Cabin: A passenger room onboard the cruise ship – sometimes called a stateroom or a berth. CBSA: Canada Border Services Agency (occasionally referred to as Canada Customs). Coastal Trading Act: An Act respecting the use of foreign ships and non-duty paid ships in the coasting trade. (Canadian version of American “Jones Act” see cabotage below). Cabotage Water transportation term applicable to shipments between ports of a nation; commonly refers to coastwise or intercoastal navigation or trade. Many nations, including the United States, have cabotage laws which require national flag vessels to provide domestic interport service. (In US this is referred to as the “Jones Act”). Chart Datum: A plan below which the tide will seldom fall. The Canadian Hydrographic Service has adopted the plane of Lowest Normal Tides (LNT) as chart datum. To find the depth of water, the height of tide must be added to the depth shown on the chart. Tidal heights preceded by a (-) must be subtracted from the charted depth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cruise Passengers' Rights & Remedies 2016
    PANEL SIX ADMIRALTY LAW: THE CRUISE PASSENGERS’ RIGHTS & REMEDIES 2016 245 246 ADMIRALTY LAW THE CRUISE PASSENGERS’ RIGHTS & REMEDIES 2016 Submitted By: HON. THOMAS A. DICKERSON Appellate Division, Second Department Brooklyn, NY 247 248 ADMIRALTY LAW THE CRUISE PASSENGERS’ RIGHTS & REMEDIES 2016 By Thomas A. Dickerson1 Introduction Thank you for inviting me to present on the Cruise Passengers’ Rights And Remedies 2016. For the last 40 years I have been writing about the travel consumer’s rights and remedies against airlines, cruise lines, rental car companies, taxis and ride sharing companies, hotels and resorts, tour operators, travel agents, informal travel promoters, and destination ground operators providing tours and excursions. My treatise, Travel Law, now 2,000 pages and first published in 1981, has been revised and updated 65 times, now at the rate of every 6 months. I have written over 400 legal articles and my weekly article on Travel Law is available worldwide on www.eturbonews.com Litigator During this 40 years, I spent 18 years as a consumer advocate specializing in prosecuting individual and class action cases on behalf of injured and victimized 1 Thomas A. Dickerson is an Associate Justice of the Appellate Division, Second Department of the New York State Supreme Court. Justice Dickerson is the author of Travel Law, Law Journal Press, 2016; Class Actions: The Law of 50 States, Law Journal Press, 2016; Article 9 [New York State Class Actions] of Weinstein, Korn & Miller, New York Civil Practice CPLR, Lexis-Nexis (MB), 2016; Consumer Protection Chapter 111 in Commercial Litigation In New York State Courts: Fourth Edition (Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruise Shipping and Urban Development the Case of Dublin
    CPB Corporate Partnership Board Cruise Shipping and Urban Development The Case of Dublin This report analyses Dublin’s attractiveness as a cruise port and assesses the impacts of cruise shipping on the city. It evaluates policies in place and provides recommendations to increase the positive impacts of cruise shipping for the city of Dublin. Over the last decade, Dublin has grown as an important port of call for cruises in Northern Europe. Cruise tourism generates significant economic benefits for the city of Dublin. The value cruise tourism brings could be further increased by developing Dublin into a cruise home port, that is a port from which cruises start and where they end. Under which conditions could this be achieved? Which policy measures would be needed? Which stakeholders would need to be involved? This report is part of the International Transport Forum’s Case-Specific Policy Analysis series. These are topical studies on specific issues carried out by the ITF in agreement with local institutions. Cruise Shipping and Urban Development The Case of Dublin Case-Specific Policy Analysis International Transport Forum 2 rue André Pascal F-75775 Paris Cedex 16 T +33 (0)1 45 24 97 10 F +33 (0)1 45 24 13 22 Email: [email protected] Web: www.itf-oecd.org 2016-12/Photo credit: Port of Dublin 2016-12/Photo Cruise Shipping and Urban Development The Case of Dublin Case-Specific Policy Analysis The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 57 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Cruise Ship Industry
    Resources (/Resources/) // Blog (/Resources/Blog) November 19, 2018 A HISTORY OF THE CRUISE SHIP INDUSTRY Cruising has come a long way from the industry’s beginnings as a way for steamship companies to supplement their earnings from hauling cargo and mail across the ocean. In 2018, an estimated 27.2 million people (https://www.f-cca.com/downloads/2018-Cruise-Industry- Overview-and-Statistics.pdf) are expected to take a cruise vacation, making the $126 billion industry (https://www.f-cca.com/downloads/2018-Cruise-Industry-Overview-and-Statistics.pdf) one of the fastest growing in the leisure travel market. Today’s ships are more luxurious (https://www.royalcaribbean.com/cruise-ships/symphony-of-the- seas) than some land-based resorts, with spas, multiple bars, restaurants, lounges, and entertainment venues. Some even include onboard waterparks and ice-skating rinks. While many vacationing passengers enjoy these megaships and the over-the-top resort amenities— rock climbing, anyone? — they present special challenges for the crews hired to maneuver and manage these vessels while keeping all aboard safe, and require special training. Resolve Maritime Academy (https://www.resolveacademy.com/Training- Courses/Courses/Advanced-Shiphandling-Conventional) offers a ve-day course on advanced ship handling that covers the complex procedures involved in maneuvering large, conventionally powered vessels. The course uses Resolve Maritime Academy’s full-mission bridge and mini-bridge simulators to teach proper procedures for situations such as docking and undocking, propulsion loss, maneuvering in high winds and currents, and avoiding collisions. In addition to instruction on handling for cruise ships, the course can be customized for container, bulker, offshore, and oil and gas vessels.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Transportation: the Role of U.S
    MARITIME TRANSPORTATION: THE ROLE OF U.S. SHIPS AND MARINERS (113–16) HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON COAST GUARD AND MARITIME TRANSPORTATION OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MAY 21, 2013 Printed for the use of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure ( Available online at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/ committee.action?chamber=house&committee=transportation U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 81–148 PDF WASHINGTON : 2014 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 15:23 Jan 16, 2014 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 P:\HEARINGS\113\CG\5-21-1~1\81148.TXT JEAN COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania, Chairman DON YOUNG, Alaska NICK J. RAHALL, II, West Virginia THOMAS E. PETRI, Wisconsin PETER A. DEFAZIO, Oregon HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, District of JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., Tennessee, Columbia Vice Chair JERROLD NADLER, New York JOHN L. MICA, Florida CORRINE BROWN, Florida FRANK A. LOBIONDO, New Jersey EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas GARY G. MILLER, California ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland SAM GRAVES, Missouri RICK LARSEN, Washington SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West Virginia MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts CANDICE S. MILLER, Michigan TIMOTHY H. BISHOP, New York DUNCAN HUNTER, California MICHAEL H. MICHAUD, Maine ERIC A. ‘‘RICK’’ CRAWFORD, Arkansas GRACE F. NAPOLITANO, California LOU BARLETTA, Pennsylvania DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas TIMOTHY J.
    [Show full text]
  • ECONOMIC IMPACT of COVID-19 on the CRUISE INDUSTRY in ALASKA, WASHINGTON, and OREGON October 20, 2020 ______
    FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION _______________________________________________ FACT FINDING INVESTIGATION NO. 30 _______________________________________________ COVID-19 IMPACT ON CRUISE INDUSTRY _______________________________________________ INTERIM REPORT: ECONOMIC IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON THE CRUISE INDUSTRY IN ALASKA, WASHINGTON, AND OREGON October 20, 2020 _______________________________________________ 1 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................. 3 II. Fact Finding Method ............................................................................................................ 4 III. Observations ........................................................................................................................ 5 A. Cruise Industry in Alaska ................................................................................................. 5 B. Anchorage ...................................................................................................................... 11 C. Seward ............................................................................................................................ 13 D. Whittier........................................................................................................................... 14 E. Juneau ............................................................................................................................. 15 F. Ketchikan .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Mega-Ships
    The Impact of Mega-Ships Case-Specific Policy Analysis The Impact of Mega-Ships Case-Specific Policy Analysis INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT FORUM The International Transport Forum at the OECD is an intergovernmental organisation with 54 member countries. It acts as a strategic think tank with the objective of helping shape the transport policy agenda on a global level and ensuring that it contributes to economic growth, environmental protection, social inclusion and the preservation of human life and well-being. The International Transport Forum organises an Annual Summit of ministers along with leading representatives from industry, civil society and academia. The International Transport Forum was created under a Declaration issued by the Council of Ministers of the ECMT (European Conference of Ministers of Transport) at its Ministerial Session in May 2006 under the legal authority of the Protocol of the ECMT, signed in Brussels on 17 October 1953, and legal instruments of the OECD. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom and United States. The International Transport Forum’s Research Centre gathers statistics and conducts co-operative research programmes addressing all modes of transport. Its findings are widely disseminated and support policy making in Member countries as well as contributing to the Annual Summit.
    [Show full text]
  • Refueling Assessment of a Zero-Emission Container Corridor Between China and the United States: Could Hydrogen Replace Fossil Fuels?
    WORKING PAPER 2020-05 © 2020 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON CLEAN TRANSPORTATION MARCH 2020 Refueling assessment of a zero-emission container corridor between China and the United States: Could hydrogen replace fossil fuels? Authors: Xiaoli Mao, Dan Rutherford, Liudmila Osipova, Bryan Comer Keywords: zero-emission vessels, hydrogen, fuel cells, shipping Introduction and background Container ships emitted 208 million tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) in 2015 (Olmer, Comer, Roy, Mao, & Rutherford, 2017), about as much as the entire economy of Vietnam (Global Carbon Atlas, n.d.). The busiest container shipping lane in the world is the transpacific corridor, and in 2015, ships moved 24 million twenty-foot-equivalent unit (TEU) containers, 46% of the world total, across the Pacific Ocean (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2016). Today, fossil fuels power container ships. In the future, if shipping is to decarbonize, zero-emission fuels must take their place. But long, deep-sea routes are particularly challenging to complete with zero-emission fuels, as these often contain less energy per unit volume than fossil fuels. Hydrogen has been used to power cars, buses, trucks, and ferries, but never a large container ship (Hall, Pavlenko, & Lutsey, 2018).1 Viking has plans for a 1,400-person (passengers plus crew) hydrogen fuel cell cruise ship, and there are small- and medium- size hydrogen-powered container ship concepts, but none are on the water today.2 That may change as the international shipping industry works to achieve the ambitions of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO’s) initial greenhouse gas (GHG) strategy. Under the strategy, the IMO aims to cut international shipping’s GHG emissions by at www.theicct.org 1 There are hydrogen applications for vessels operated inland and in short sea shipping.
    [Show full text]
  • LNG Review October 2018 - Recent Issues and Events - Hiroshi Hashimoto∗
    IEEJ: November 2018© IEEJ2018 LNG Review October 2018 - Recent issues and events - Hiroshi Hashimoto∗ Introduction Northeast Asia's overall LNG prices were the highest in October 2018 since 2014 and are expected to stay in high levels for the next couple of months as the JCC (Japan's average crude oil import price) came near to USD 80 / bbl in October. On the other hand, although spot LNG prices in the region stayed above the levels in the last four years in October 2018, they began to stabilize due to slightly warmer weather and higher storage levels in the markets ahead of winter. According to the two countries' custom statistics, during the first ten months of 2018, China imported 72.06 million tonnes of natural gas (including pipeline gas supply and LNG), a 33% increase over the same period in 2017, compared to 69.26 million tonnes or a tiny decrease by Japan. Meanwhile Korea increased LNG imports by 18%, or 5.46 million tonnes year-on-year in the ten- month period in 2018. During the month of October, the Ichthys LNG project in Australia started exporting LNG. Thanks to increases demand in Asia, the world is expected to trade 310 million tonnes of LNG in the year. There were notable discussions on flexibility and security in the LNG market in the month. A hybrid approach that ties term-contract LNG prices to multiple indices was the most favoured by attendees at the annual LNG Producer- Consumer Conference in Nagoya Japan. Japan's and the European Commission's expert group proposed wording for LNG contracts to enhance flexibility and leads to a more liquid market.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruise & Ferry References
    VIKING GRACE Environmentally compliant and efficient with LNG Owner: Viking Line, Finland Yard: STX, Finland Delivery: 2012 Scope of supply: • Dual-fuel machinery and propulsion system • LNG tanks and fuel supply and handling system • Safety and automation systems • Related system engineering and analysis • Integrated automation system Wärtsilä NACOS VALMATIC Platinum • CCTV System 1 © Wärtsilä 17.6.2016 Wärtsilä Marine References SUPERSPEED II Color Line selects Wärtsilä scrubber systems to operate in emission controlled areas Owner: Color Line Yard: Aker Yards, Rauma, Finland Delivery: 2014 Scope of supply: • 4 x inline open loop scrubber systems • 4 x Wärtsilä 9L46 engines • 4 x Wärtsilä 6L46 auxiliary engines • Integrated Automation System DAMATIC 2 © Wärtsilä 17.6.2016 Wärtsilä Marine References QUEEN MARY II Cruise ship to meet strict environmental regulations with Wärtsilä wastewater treatment systems Owner: MSC Cruises Yard: STX Europe, France Scope of supply: • 2 x membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems • 4 x Wärtsilä 46 engines 3 © Wärtsilä 17.6.2016 Wärtsilä Marine References OASIS OF THE SEAS Full focus on the core business Owner: Royal Caribbean International Yard: STX Europe, Finland Delivery: 2009 Scope of supply: • 6 x Wärtsilä 46 engines • 3 x 12-cylinder engines • 4 x 5.5 MW Wärtsilä bow thrusters • Wärtsilä Dynamic Positioning (DP) • Entertainment AV and lightning systems in all venues • Crew TV head-end • 4 x Wärtsilä Serck Como MSF evaporators • 5 year service agreement covering engines on 29 RCL cruise ships 4 © Wärtsilä 17.6.2016 Wärtsilä Marine References CROWN PRINCESS Wärtsilä MBR plant allows for the treatment of black and grey water to satisfy the most stringent standards Owner: Princess Cruise Line Yard: Fincantieri Scope of supply: • 3 x Wärtsilä Hamworthy MBR16 Membrane BioReactor plants capable of managing up to 947 m3/day of waste water.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Vessel in Foreign Trade Entrances
    Filing Last Port Call Sign Foreign Trade Official Voyage Vessel Type Dock Code Filing Port Name Manifest Number Filing Date Last Domestic Port Vessel Name Last Foreign Port Number IMO Number Country Code Number Number Vessel Flag Code Agent Name PAX Total Crew Operator Name Draft Tonnage Owner Name Dock Name InTrans 3801 DETROIT, MI 3801-2021-00374 8/13/2021 - ALGOMA NIAGARA PORT COLBORNE, ONT CFFO 9619270 CA 2 840674 30 CA 330 WORLD SHIPPING INC 0 19 ALGOMA CENTRAL CORP. 23'0" 8979 ALGOMA CENTRAL CORP. ST. MARYS CEMENT CO., DETROIT PLANT WHARF D 5301 HOUSTON, TX 5301-2021-05471 8/13/2021 - IONIC STORM PUERTO QUETZAL V7BQ9 9332963 GT 1 5190 71 MH 229 Southport Agencies 0 20 IONIC SHIPPING (MGT) INC 32'0" 18504 SCOTIA PROJECTS LTD CITY DOCK NOS. 41 - 46 L 3002 TACOMA, WA 3002-2021-00775 8/13/2021 - HYUNDAI BRAVE VANCOUVER, BC V7EY4. 9346304 CA 3 7477 95 MH 310 HYUNDAI AMERICA SHIPPING AGENCY 0 25 HMM OCEAN SERVICE CO. LTD 38'5" 51638 SHIP OWNER INVESTMENT CO NO 7 S.A. WASHINGTON UNITED TERMINALS, TACOMA WHARF (WUT) DFL 5301 HOUSTON, TX 5301-2021-05472 8/13/2021 - NAVIGATOR EUROPA DAESAN D5FZ3 9661807 KR 2 16397 2102 LR 150 Fillette Green Shipping 0 20 NAVIGATOR EUROPA LLC 36'5" 5163 NAVIGATO EUROPA LLC BAYPORT RO RO TERMINAL D 1816 PORT CANAVERAL, FL 1816-2021-00412 8/13/2021 - DISNEY DREAM CASTAWAY CAY C6YR6 9434254 BS 1 8001800 1081 BS 350 Disney Cruise Lines 1348 1230 MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED 28'2" 104345 MAGICAL CRUISE COMPANY LIMITED CT8 DISNEY CRUISE TERMINAL 8 N 3001 SEATTLE, WA 3001-2021-01615 8/13/2021 SKAGWAY, AK CELEBRITY MILLENNIUM - 9HJF9 9189419 - 4 9189419 56800 MT 350 INTERCRUISES SHORESIDE & PORT SERVICES 1142 744 CELEBRITY CRUISES INC.
    [Show full text]