Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47395-8 — Rome, China, and the Barbarians Randolph B

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47395-8 — Rome, China, and the Barbarians Randolph B Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47395-8 — Rome, China, and the Barbarians Randolph B. Ford Index More Information Index Abasgi, , – in ancient China, –, Achaeans, , in Greco-Roman and Chinese ethnography, Adrianople, , – Aeëtes, in the Jin shu, –, , , – Aelius Aristides, , , use of in the Wars and the Jin shu, –, Aeneas, , , , , Aeschylus, Ardabur, Aestii, Areobindus, , Africans, Arianism. See Christianity Agathias, , , –, –, , , Aristotle, , , , , – attitude toward Sasanian Persia of, – Arminius, – Agricola. See Tacitus Artabanes, Agricola, governor of Britain, , Aspar, , Airs, Waters, Places. See Hippocrates astrology, –, Alans, – in Chinese ethnography, – Alaric, , in Greco-Roman ethnography, – Alexander Severus, in the Jin shu, Amalafrida, , Athalaric, , –, , , – Amalasuintha, , –, , , , characterization of, –, education of, – characterization of, – Athaulf, –, Amazons, Athens, , Ammianus Marcellinus, –, , , , Atreus, Augustine, ethnography of Sasanian Persia of, – Augustus, , – Anastasius, emperor, , , Aulus Gellius, Anecdota/Secret History. See Procopius Aurelian, , Anicia Juliana, Aurelius Victor, – Antae, –, , Avars, ethnography of, Antaeus, Ba 巴, Antiphon, Babylonians, , Aphrodite, Ba-Di 巴氐, –, , , See Di 氐 Apotelesmatika/Tetrabiblos. See Ptolemy of Ban Biao 班彪, Alexandria Ban Gu 班固, , , , –, , , Arbogast, , , –, Arborychoi, Dongguan hanji 東觀漢記, Arcadians, – Han shu 漢書, , –, , –, archaizing ethnonyms. See Scythians, See Si Yi/ –, , , , Four Barbarians, See Germani, See hostility toward barbarians of, – Massagetae, See Cimmerians, See Getae praise of Xiongnu individuals of, – © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47395-8 — Rome, China, and the Barbarians Randolph B. Ford Index More Information Index Ba-Pu 巴濮, , Caesar, Julius, , , –, , , , , barbarian , , Chinese equivalents of, –, See Si Yi/Four Bellum Gallicum, , , Barbarians Caledonians, , , ethnic implications of, – Calgacus, , , etymology of, Cao-Wei 曹魏. See Wei kingdom etymology of, Caracalla, as semantic category, –, Carians, , barbarians Carthaginians, , , , , dichotomy/antithesis, , Cassiodorus, –, , , Chinese notions of, –, – praise of Gothic rulers of, – Greek notions of, – Cassius Dio, , perpetuation in Jin shu of, – Celts, , –, , , , , – perpetuation in Wars of Procopius of, Chang’an 長安, , , , , , – Chanyu 單于, , , , –, – Roman notions of, – Chaoxian 朝鮮, education of, – Chen Shou 陳壽, , , , as political actors, –, –, See Sanguo zhi 三國志, , , , political legitimacy Chen 陳 dynasty, , views of in early Tang dynasty, –, Chenghan 成漢 dynasty, , , –, See –, –, , –, , Di 氐 –, –, – rulers of, , – views of in Greece, Rome, and China, Chenhan辰韓, – Cherusci, views of in Late Antiquity, –, –, Chinese –, –, , –, –, as anachronistic term, , – ancient terms for, , basileus-βασιλεύς Chorsamantis, as imperial title, –, Chosroes. See Khosrow I Anoshirvan as title for barbarian rulers in the Wars, Christianity, , – –, , Arianism, –, , , , Bei Qi shu 北齊書. See Li Baiyao association with imperial office, – Belisarius, , , , , , , , Catholicism, –, –, , , , , –, –, –, – – persecution of under the Vandals, – Bellum Gallicum. See Caesar, Julius toleration of under the Goths, benxing 本性. See xing Chronicles/zaiji 載記, , –, –, Bixi 辟奚, , Black Cloaks. See Melanchlainoi contents of, – Black Sea, , , , –, , lack of ethnographic description in, – Blemmyes, lun colophons to, – Bochas, preface to, – Boethius, Chu 楚, warring state, –, Boniface, Roman commander, Chunqiu 春秋/Spring and Autumn Annals, , Boudica, , Britain, – Chunwei 淳維, , , , , – Britons, , , Cicero, , , Buddhism, –, , Cimbri, Burgundians, Cimmerians, , – Busta Gallorum, civilitas, , , , , Byzantium, , , , , , Classicist/Confucian tradition, –, , , See Constantinople , , , , , Claudius Gothicus, Cabaon, Claudius, emperor, , , Cadmos, Commodus, , © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47395-8 — Rome, China, and the Barbarians Randolph B. Ford Index More Information Index comparative study Drusus, of Greco-Roman and Chinese historiography, dynastic history/zhengshi 正史 – ethnography in, –, of Greece-Rome and China, –, –, format of, , –, , – Confucianism. See Classicist/Confucian tradition Early Middle Ages Europe and China, –, Confucius 孔子, , , –, , , , –, –, – Eastern Jin 東晉 dynasty, , , , , Constantine, –, , , –, –, , , Constantine VII, , – Constantinian dynasty, Egyptians, , , , , , , Constantinople, , , , , , , , Elagabalus, , , –, , , , , environmental determinism , , , in Fan Ye, Constantius I, , in Herodotus, Constantius II, , in Hippocrates, – Constitutio Antoniniana, in the Jin shu, – Croesus, , in Pliny the Elder, – Ctesias, , in Polybius, – Cui Hong 崔鴻, , in relation to empire, – Shiliu guo chunqiu 十六國春秋/Spring and in Seneca the Younger, – Autumn Annals of the Sixteen Kingdoms, in Sima Qian, – , Epitome de Caesaribus, , Cyclopes, Eratosthenes of Cyrene, , Cyrus the Great, , , , eschatoi andrōn-ἔσχατοι ἀνδρῶν, Cyrus the Younger, Ethiopians, , , , ethnicity Dagalaiphus, absence of as criterion of political legitimacy in Dai 代, Tabgach Särbi-Xianbei state, the Wars of Procopius, – Dalmatia, of barbarians and modern biases, – Danaans, as criterion of political legitimacy in the Jin Danaus, shu, – Danube, , , , , , , –, definition of, – , , as factor in Tang political legitimacy, dao 道, importance of ethnogenealogy in, –, Darius, –, , –, –, , –, – Dayuan 大宛, , of post-Roman kingdoms, , de 德, , , under Roman Empire, – Di 氐, , , , –, , , , ethnogenealogy. See ethnicity, See political –, –, , , –, See legitimacy Wu Hu ethnography Di 狄, , –, , –, , , , –, archaizing ethnonyms in, – –, –, –, –, , as body of discourse, – , –, , –, –, , genealogical paradigm of, –, , , , , See Si Yi/ in Chinese tradition, Four Barbarians in Greco-Roman tradition, Northern Di, , , in the Wars and the Jin shu, Dido, geography-climate paradigm of, Dingling 丁零, in Chinese tradition, Diocletian, , , – in Greco-Roman tradition, Diodorus Siculus, , in the Wars and the Jin shu, Dodona, historical paradigm of, Domitian, in Chinese tradition, Dongguan hanji 東觀漢記. See Ban Gu in Greco-Roman tradition, Donghu 東胡, , , in the Wars and the Jin shu, © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47395-8 — Rome, China, and the Barbarians Randolph B. Ford Index More Information Index ethnography (cont.) Galates, in Chinese historiography, –, Galatians, – in Chinese philosophical and ritual texts, Galla Placidia, – – Gallic Empire, in Greco-Roman historiography, – Gallienus, rationalizing function of, Gao Yun 高雲, Etruscans, , , Gao Zhan 高瞻, Eudocia, , , Gauls, –, –, , , , Eugenius, Gelimer, , , –, –, – characterization of, – fall of Rome as a historical problem, as tyrant, Fan Ye 范曄, –, –, , , , Gepids, , , , , , ethnography of the Wuhuan 烏桓 of, Germani, , , –, , , , See – Franks Hou Han shu 後漢書, , –, –, as archaizing ethnonym, –, , Germania, –, –, See Tacitus Fang Xuanling 房玄齡. See Jin shu Germanic languages, , , Feng Ba 馮跋, , – Germanicus, Five Barbarians. See Wu Hu Germanus, , Five Element theory, –, , , Geta, Flavians, Getae, , Flavus, , Getica. See Jordanes Former Liang 前涼 dynasty, – Gibbon, Edward, Former Qin 前秦 dynasty, , , , Godas, , , –, See Di 氐 Godisthea, political legitimacy of, Gontharis, ethnogenealogy as factor in, Goths, , , –, –, , , Former Yan 前燕 dynasty, , , , , , , , , –, , , , –, –, See Särbi-Xianbei –, , , , , –, political legitimacy of, – , ethnogenealogy as factor in, – as barbarians, –, , rulers of, – barbarism of, Former Zhao 前趙 dynasty, , –, , ethnogenealogy of, – , –, , , , ethnography of, – See Xiongnu as Getae, ethnography of, – history of, – genealogy of, – injustice of under Theodahad, – political legitimacy of, – as liberators of Italy, – ethnogenealogy as factor in, – Ostrogoths, , , , , , , , rulers of, Fotudeng 佛圖澄, political illegitimacy of, –, – Franks, , , , , , , –, political legitimacy of, –, – , , , , , , rulers of, –, – as descendants of the Germani-Γερμάνοι, , as rulers of barbarians, – , –, Scandinavian origins of, ethnography of, – as Scythians, , , Fu Jian 符堅, , – Gouboulgoudou, Fu Rong 苻融, –, Great Yu 大禹, , , , –, , Funan 扶南, , , Greeks, , , –, –, , , –, Fuxi 伏羲, – –, , –, , –, , Fuyu 夫餘, , , , , , , , , ethnic identity of, , –, , , – Gabazes, as term for eastern Romans, , , Gaiseric, –, – Guan Zhong 管仲, , , , characterization of, – Gubazes, © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-47395-8 — Rome, China, and the Barbarians Randolph B. Ford Index More Information Index Gunthamund, as ideological expression, – Guoyu 國語, , , , in pre-imperial China, – shared features of in Greece/Rome and China, Han Anguo 韓安國, – Han shu 漢書. See Ban Gu speeches in Greco-Roman and Chinese Han Wudi 漢武帝, , , , historiography, – Han Zhao 漢趙 dynasty. See Former Zhao as vehicle for ethnographic discourse, dynasty – Han 漢 as ethnonym, , , , , , Homer, –, –, , , , , , –, , , , , , – Han 漢 dynasty, , , –, , , , , , as early ethnography, – –, , –, , , –, Iliad, , –, , , , , , , , , , , impact on later historiography of, – , , , –, , –, Odyssey, – –, , , , Honorius, , , , Eastern Han, , , Hou Han shu 後漢書. See Fan Ye fall of, – Hu 胡, , , , political legacy of, , –, –, as collective
Recommended publications
  • An Overview of Hakka Migration History: Where Are You From?
    客家 My China Roots & CBA Jamaica An overview of Hakka Migration History: Where are you from? July, 2016 www.mychinaroots.com & www.cbajamaica.com 15 © My China Roots An Overview of Hakka Migration History: Where Are You From? Table of Contents Introduction.................................................................................................................................... 3 Five Key Hakka Migration Waves............................................................................................. 3 Mapping the Waves ....................................................................................................................... 3 First Wave: 4th Century, “the Five Barbarians,” Jin Dynasty......................................................... 4 Second Wave: 10th Century, Fall of the Tang Dynasty ................................................................. 6 Third Wave: Late 12th & 13th Century, Fall Northern & Southern Song Dynasties ....................... 7 Fourth Wave: 2nd Half 17th Century, Ming-Qing Cataclysm .......................................................... 8 Fifth Wave: 19th – Early 20th Century ............................................................................................. 9 Case Study: Hakka Migration to Jamaica ............................................................................ 11 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 11 Context for Early Migration: The Coolie Trade...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion on the Early History of the Formation of Beijing Mandarin Wei
    2017 3rd International Conference on Education and Social Development (ICESD 2017) ISBN: 978-1-60595-444-8 Discussion on the Early History of the Formation of Beijing Mandarin Wei-Wei LI College of International Exchange, Bohai University, Jinzhou, Liaoning, China [email protected] Keywords: Beijing Mandarin Area, Early History, Ethnic Fusion, Language Contact. Abstract. Beijing Mandarin is more than a thousand year ago Yan Yan dialect, based on the integration of the Central Plains Han and northern ethnic minority language components gradually formed. Beijing Mandarin before the formal formation of a long period of gestation, revealing the Sui and Tang dynasties before the formation of the Beijing Mandarin area early human history, for the understanding of Beijing Mandarin language situation is very important. Introduction In this article, "Beijing Mandarin area" means including Beijing urban and suburban county, Hebei Chengde area, much of the northeast in addition to Liaodong peninsula, and parts of Chifeng, Inner Mongolia autonomous region, the general area (Lin Tao, 1987; Zhang Shifang, 2010). "From the northeast to Beijing, in history, there are two common characteristics: one is the ethnic group for a long time, and second, the population flow, this kind of situation lasted nearly one thousand years, the development of northeast dialect and Beijing dialect is extremely far-reaching influence."[1] Beijing dialect and northeast dialect in one thousand to influence each other, eventually forming a Beijing mandarin, including large areas of the northeast and Beijing area. The formation of Beijing mandarin has experienced a long historical process, is more than one thousand years ago YouYan dialect, on the basis of constantly fusion of han nationality and composition of gradually formed in the northern minority languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Perspectives on the Early Relations of the Korean Peninsula with the Eurasian Steppe
    SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 301 May, 2020 Archaeological Perspectives on the Early Relations of the Korean Peninsula with the Eurasian Steppe by Kang, In Uk Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS FOUNDED 1986 Editor-in-Chief VICTOR H. MAIR Associate Editors PAULA ROBERTS MARK SWOFFORD ISSN 2157-9679 (print) 2157-9687 (online) SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series dedicated to making available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor-in-chief actively encourages younger, not yet well established scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including romanized modern standard Mandarin and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino-Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. Submissions are regularly sent out for peer review, and extensive editorial suggestions for revision may be offered. Sino-Platonic Papers emphasizes substance over form.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Shuma the Chinese Analog of Soma/Haoma? a Study of Early Contacts Between Indo-Iranians and Chinese
    SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 216 October, 2011 Is Shuma the Chinese Analog of Soma/Haoma? A Study of Early Contacts between Indo-Iranians and Chinese by ZHANG He Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS FOUNDED 1986 Editor-in-Chief VICTOR H. MAIR Associate Editors PAULA ROBERTS MARK SWOFFORD ISSN 2157-9679 (print) 2157-9687 (online) SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series dedicated to making available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor-in-chief actively encourages younger, not yet well established, scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including romanized modern standard Mandarin (MSM) and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino- Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. Submissions are regularly sent out to be refereed, and extensive editorial suggestions for revision may be offered. Sino-Platonic Papers emphasizes substance over form.
    [Show full text]
  • Maria Khayutina • [email protected] the Tombs
    Maria Khayutina [email protected] The Tombs of Peng State and Related Questions Paper for the Chicago Bronze Workshop, November 3-7, 2010 (, 1.1.) () The discovery of the Western Zhou period’s Peng State in Heng River Valley in the south of Shanxi Province represents one of the most fascinating archaeological events of the last decade. Ruled by a lineage of Kui (Gui ) surname, Peng, supposedly, was founded by descendants of a group that, to a certain degree, retained autonomy from the Huaxia cultural and political community, dominated by lineages of Zi , Ji and Jiang surnames. Considering Peng’s location right to the south of one of the major Ji states, Jin , and quite close to the eastern residence of Zhou kings, Chengzhou , its case can be very instructive with regard to the construction of the geo-political and cultural space in Early China during the Western Zhou period. Although the publication of the full excavations’ report may take years, some preliminary observations can be made already now based on simplified archaeological reports about the tombs of Peng ruler Cheng and his spouse née Ji of Bi . In the present paper, I briefly introduce the tombs inventory and the inscriptions on the bronzes, and then proceed to discuss the following questions: - How the tombs M1 and M2 at Hengbei can be dated? - What does the equipment of the Hengbei tombs suggest about the cultural roots of Peng? - What can be observed about Peng’s relations to the Gui people and to other Kui/Gui- surnamed lineages? 1. General Information The cemetery of Peng state has been discovered near Hengbei village (Hengshui town, Jiang County, Shanxi ).
    [Show full text]
  • The Paradigm of Hakka Women in History
    DOI: 10.4312/as.2021.9.1.31-64 31 The Paradigm of Hakka Women in History Sabrina ARDIZZONI* Abstract Hakka studies rely strongly on history and historiography. However, despite the fact that in rural Hakka communities women play a central role, in the main historical sources women are almost absent. They do not appear in genealogy books, if not for their being mothers or wives, although they do appear in some legends, as founders of villages or heroines who distinguished themselves in defending the villages in the absence of men. They appear in modern Hakka historiography—Hakka historiography is a very recent discipline, beginning at the end of the 19th century—for their moral value, not only for adhering to Confucian traditional values, but also for their endorsement of specifically Hakka cultural values. In this paper we will analyse the cultural paradigm that allows women to become part of Hakka history. We will show how ethical values are reflected in Hakka historiography through the reading of the earliest Hakka historians as they depict- ed Hakka women. Grounded on these sources, we will see how the narration of women in Hakka history has developed until the present day. In doing so, it is necessary to deal with some relevant historical features in the construc- tion of Hakka group awareness, namely migration, education, and women narratives, as a pivotal foundation of Hakka collective social and individual consciousness. Keywords: Hakka studies, Hakka woman, women practices, West Fujian Paradigma žensk Hakka v zgodovini Izvleček Študije skupnosti Hakka se močno opirajo na zgodovino in zgodovinopisje.
    [Show full text]
  • 15. HIBISCUS Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 2: 693. 1753, Nom. Cons
    Flora of China 12: 286–294. 2007. 15. HIBISCUS Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 2: 693. 1753, nom. cons. 木槿属 mu jin shu Bombycidendron Zollinger & Moritzi; Fioria Mattei; Furcaria (Candolle) Kosteletzky (1836), not Desvaux (1827); Hibiscus sect. Furcaria Candolle; H. sect. Sabdariffa Candolle; Ketmia Miller; Sabdariffa (Candolle) Kosteletzky; Solandra Murray (1785), not Linnaeus (1759), nor Swartz (1787), nom. cons.; Talipariti Fryxell. Shrubs, subshrubs, trees, or herbs. Leaf blade palmately lobed or entire, basal veins 3 or more. Flowers axillary, usually solitary, sometimes subterminal and ± congested into a terminal raceme, 5-merous, bisexual. Epicalyx lobes 5 to many, free or connate at base, rarely very short (H. schizopetalus) or absent (H. lobatus). Calyx campanulate, rarely shallowly cup-shaped or tubular, 5-lobed or 5-dentate, persistent. Corolla usually large and showy, variously colored, often with dark center; petals adnate at base to staminal tube. Filament tube well developed, apex truncate or 5-dentate; anthers throughout or only on upper half of tube. Ovary 5-loculed or, as a result of false partitions, 10-loculed; ovules 3 to many per locule; style branches 5; stigmas capitate. Fruit a capsule, cylindrical to globose, valves 5, dehiscence loculicidal and sometimes partially septicidal or indehiscent (H. vitifolius Linnaeus). Seeds reniform, hairy or glandular verrucose. About 200 species: tropical and subtropical regions; 25 species (12 endemic, four introduced) in China. According to recent molecular studies (Pfeil et al., Syst. Bot. 27: 333–350. 2002), Hibiscus is paraphyletic, and as more taxa are sampled and a more robust phylogeny is constructed, the genus undoubtedly will be recast. Species of other genera of Hibisceae found in China, such as Abelmoschus, Malvaviscus, and Urena, fall within a monophyletic Hibiscus clade.
    [Show full text]
  • In Koguryo Dynasty the State-Formation History Starts from B
    International Journal of Korean History(Vol.6, Dec.2004) 1 History of Koguryŏ and China’s Northeast Asian Project 1Park Kyeong-chul * Introduction The Koguryŏ Dynasty, established during the 3rd century B.C. around the Maek tribe is believed to have begun its function as a centralized entity in the Northeast Asia region. During the period between 1st century B.C. and 1st century A.D. aggressive regional expansion policy from the Koguryŏ made it possible to overcome its territorial limitations and weak economic basis. By the end of the 4th century A.D., Koguryŏ emerged as an empire that had acquired its own independent lebensraum in Northeast Asia. This research paper will delve into identifying actual founders of the Koguryŏ Dynasty and shed light on their lives prior to the actual establishment of the Dynasty. Then on, I will analyze the establishment process of Koguryŏ Dynasty. Thereafter, I will analyze the history of Koguryŏ Dynasty at three different stages: the despotic military state period, the period in which Koguryŏ emerged as an independent empire in Northeast Asia, and the era of war against the Sui and Tang dynasty. Upon completion of the above task, I will illustrate the importance of Koguryŏ history for Koreans. Finally, I attempt to unearth the real objectives why the Chinese academics are actively promoting the Northeast Asian Project. * Professor, Dept. of Liberal Arts, Kangnam University 2 History of Koguryŏ and China’s Northeast Asian Project The Yemaek tribe and their culture1 The main centers of East Asian culture in approximately 2000 B.C. were China - by this point it had already become an agrarian society - and the Mongol-Siberian region where nomadic cultures reign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Agricultural Civilization in China: the Disparity Between Archeological Discovery and the Documentary Record and Its Explanation
    SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 175 December, 2006 The Rise of Agricultural Civilization in China: The Disparity between Archeological Discovery and the Documentary Record and Its Explanation by Zhou Jixu Center for East Asian Studies, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Chinese Department, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series edited by Victor H. Mair. The purpose of the series is to make available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor actively encourages younger, not yet well established, scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including Romanized Modern Standard Mandarin (MSM) and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino-Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. The only style-sheet we honor is that of consistency. Where possible, we prefer the usages of the Journal of Asian Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Aspects of the Commodity and Financial Futures Market in China Sanzhu Zhu
    Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law Volume 3 | Issue 2 Article 4 2009 Legal Aspects of the Commodity and Financial Futures Market in China Sanzhu Zhu Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjcfcl Recommended Citation Sanzhu Zhu, Legal Aspects of the Commodity and Financial Futures Market in China, 3 Brook. J. Corp. Fin. & Com. L. (2009). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjcfcl/vol3/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. LEGAL ASPECTS OF THE COMMODITY AND FINANCIAL FUTURES MARKET IN CHINA Sanzhu Zhu* I. INTRODUCTION The establishment of China’s first commodity futures exchange in Zhengzhou, Henan in October 1990 marked the emergence of a futures market in China. The Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange was created in the wake of the country’s economic reform and development, and it became the first experimental commodity futures market approved by the central government. The Zhengzhou Commodity Exchange provided a platform and facilitated a need for commodity futures trading arising alongside China’s economic reform, which had begun in 1978, and which was moving towards a market economy by the early 1990s.1 Sixteen years later, the China Financial Futures Exchange (CFFEX) was established in Shanghai.2 This was followed by the opening of gold futures trading on the Shanghai Futures Exchange on January 9, 2008.3 China gradually developed a legal and regulatory framework for its commodity and financial futures markets beginning in the early 1990s, * Senior Lecturer in Chinese commercial law, School of Law, SOAS, University of London.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles the Qin
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Qin and Literati Culture in Song China A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Asian Languages and Cultures by Meimei Zhang 2019 © Copyright by Meimei Zhang 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Qin and Literati Culture in Song China by Meimei Zhang Doctor of Philosophy in Asian Languages and Cultures University of California, Los Angeles, 2019 Professor David C Schaberg, Chair My dissertation examines the distinctive role that the qin played in Chinese literati culture in the Song dynasty (960-1279) through its representations in literary texts. As one of the earliest stringed musical instruments in China, the qin has occupied a unique status in Chinese cultural history. It has been played since ancient times, and has traditionally been favored by Chinese scholars and literati as an instrument of great subtlety and refinement. This dissertation focuses on the period of the Song because it was during this period that the literati developed as a class and started to indulge themselves in various cultural and artistic pursuits, and record their experiences in literary compositions as part of their self-fashioning. Among these cultural pursuits, the qin playing was an important one. Although there have been several academic works on the qin, most of them focus on the musical aspects of the instrument. My project aims to reorient the perspective on the qin by revealing its close relationship and interaction with the literati class from a series of ii historical and literary approaches. During the Song, the qin was mentioned in a multiplicity of literary texts, and associated with a plethora of renowned literary figures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition of Inner Asian Groups in the Central Plain During the Sixteen Kingdoms Period and Northern Dynasties
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2018 Remaking Chineseness: The Transition Of Inner Asian Groups In The Central Plain During The Sixteen Kingdoms Period And Northern Dynasties Fangyi Cheng University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Asian History Commons, and the Asian Studies Commons Recommended Citation Cheng, Fangyi, "Remaking Chineseness: The Transition Of Inner Asian Groups In The Central Plain During The Sixteen Kingdoms Period And Northern Dynasties" (2018). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2781. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2781 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2781 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Remaking Chineseness: The Transition Of Inner Asian Groups In The Central Plain During The Sixteen Kingdoms Period And Northern Dynasties Abstract This dissertation aims to examine the institutional transitions of the Inner Asian groups in the Central Plain during the Sixteen Kingdoms period and Northern Dynasties. Starting with an examination on the origin and development of Sinicization theory in the West and China, the first major chapter of this dissertation argues the Sinicization theory evolves in the intellectual history of modern times. This chapter, in one hand, offers a different explanation on the origin of the Sinicization theory in both China and the West, and their relationships. In the other hand, it incorporates Sinicization theory into the construction of the historical narrative of Chinese Nationality, and argues the theorization of Sinicization attempted by several scholars in the second half of 20th Century. The second and third major chapters build two case studies regarding the transition of the central and local institutions of the Inner Asian polities in the Central Plain, which are the succession system and the local administrative system.
    [Show full text]