Forrest, Thomas R., Hurricane, Betsy, 1965

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Forrest, Thomas R., Hurricane, Betsy, 1965 University of Delaware Disaster Research Center HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE DISASTER SERIES #5 HURRICANE BETSY, 1965; A SELECTIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSE IN THE NEW ORLEANS AREA Thomas R. Forrest 1979 FOREWORD Following IIurricane 3etsy, the Disaster bsearch Center undertook an intensive study of some of the organizational responses in the New Orleans area. From the data gathered in field work, a working paper was prepared several years later. This was never publicly circulated beyond DRC because it was iaterided to be but the first of two or three other extensive case studies which were to be part of a comparative analysis of camunity orga- nizational response to major disaster. For a variety of reasons the other case studies were never written. However, the New Orleans case study, even at the present time, still is one of the more detailed ones existing in disaster literature. It is, therefore, now being published in nore public folm, so disaster researchers and historians will have easier access to the material. The present version is almost identical to the original working paper except for some minor editing and limited bibliographical updating. As such, time reference to the organizations and actions described in the mono- graph refer to the year 1965 when the hurricane hit Louisiana. Structure and functim of such groups as local Red Cross chapters aad civil defense have changed somewhat in the ensuicg decade. E. L. Qucirantc1I.i Direct or ii The author acknmrledges tSe ascist,?nce of David Adams, Jmcs Rcsri, B-zbara Tootle, and Stephen Vargo in the preparation of this paper. CONTEWS Page foreword.. ...................................................ii Acknofijledgment................................................. iii Table .......................................................... vi Chapter 1. IKIRODUCTION. 0 . - - . , 1 Hurricane Experience: A Disaster Subculture Data Collection XI. DESCRIPTIVE ACCOUNT OF HURRICANE BETSY IN NEW ORLEANS. .5 Hurricane Betsy: Pre-Iupact Hurricane Betsy: Impact Hurricane Betsy : Post Imp ac t Chronology - 111. CIVIL DEFENSE. .................... .22 Organizational Structure Pre-Eargency Tasks Bsevious Disaster Experience Emergency Ad aptat ions Organizational Adaptations Decision Making Authority Structure Task Reorientation Interorganizational Relationslips Conclusions IV. THE NEW ORLEANS SALVATION AF??: HURRICANE BETSY DISMTER RELIEF. ....................46 National Organizational Structure of the Salvation Amy Organizational Structure of the Salvation Army in New Orleans . Salvation Army Emergency Operations Intra- and Inter-organizational Relationships in - Ehergency Operations ,; Interorganizational Problems Summary V. THE NnJ ORLEANS RED CROSS. .............. .66 Tasks and Authority Mobilization of the New Orleans Red Cross Chapter Red Cross Shelter Operations Conclusion VI. NEW ORLEANS PU3LIC SERVICE INCORPORATED. .......-86 Organizational Structure -- Pre-Impact Period Organizational Structure -- Impact Period Organizational Structure -- Post-Impact Period Problems and Adaptations Concluc- ?s iV Chapter VII. SOVTEE!N BELL TELEPXOIE AND TEL?GKNH COMPANY. 0 e103 Intr >duction Gene tal Organizctional Structure Pre-OLsastcr Frepsrztions Ene-gency Pericd: 9:OO p.m. Thursdg to Daylight =iday Pos .-Stom Period: Sept..tsn:Tar 10 thrc ~ghSepfmber 19 Int xorganizatioL3a1 Relat.:onships Other Operating Problems Summary VIII. CORcmTsION. .....................e.125 Organizational Changes 1s. REFERFXES. ...................... 131 V 1. Disaster Service and support tasks performel by local Red Croes Chapters ........................ ..........,.................... 70 vi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION This monograph presents a descriptive case study of organizational response to the threat and impact of Hurricane Betsy which struck Net? Orleans, Louisiana September 9 and 10, 1965. The study focuses on five organizations: Civil Defense, Salvation Amy, Red Cross, Public Works (which includes electric, gas, and transit division), and the Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company. Each chapter will concentrate on the particular organization's adaptation to increased demands brought about by the disaster agent. In focusing on organizational adaptations to a disaster, we will be concerned with the unique situation of a "double disaster." A double disaster is the occurrence of one disaster agent (hurricane) followed shortly by another disaster agent (flood). While Organizations expected and prepared for a hurricane, they were also confronted with a flood which required reassessment in allocating existing and emergency re- sources. Extensive flooding, resulting from a tidal surge, forced water from the Mississippi River to overflow the existing levee struc- ture. The eastern section of the city experienced the bulk of the flood. Three time periods will be used in discussing the double disaster: pre-impact, impact, end post-impact. The pre-impact stage is the period preceding the hurricane-f lood in which a hurricane warning alerts orga- nizations to prepare for the ensuing disaster. This stage is charac- terized by organizations mobilizing their material resources and person- nel according to a disaster plan formulated from previous hurricane experience. The pre-impact stage is somevrhat different for each orga- nization since so= organizations began preparations before others; how- ever. for the purposes of this monograph, 8:OO p.m. September 9 will designate the end of the pre-impact stage and the beginning of the impact period. The impact period continues from 8:OO p,m. September 9 until 9:00 a.m. September 10, This stage is characterizied by various degrees of organizational response ranging from total inactivity to active in- volvement (e.g., providing transportation for evacuees). It was in this period that the hurricane swept its way across southern Louisiana, simul- teneously creating a tidal surge which lead to extensive flooding. Al- though the hurricaae did cause heavy damage, the immediate problem6 faced by organizations in the post-impact stage centered around the flooding. The post-impact stage began around 9:OO a.m. September 10 and ended at a different tine foi each organization; however, for most orga- nizations some degree of normalcy was reached by September 26, 1975. It is on this post-impact period that each chapter will focus, describing the adaptations each organization had to naite in confronting the double disaster. Hurricane Experience: A Disaster Subculture Hurricanes are not new to the New Orleans area. Previous hurricane threats and side effects have enabled organizations to mdce specific adaptations in confronting these storms. Hurricane Hilda in 1964 pro- vided a very real experience which encouraged organizations to develop detailed energency plaas. It was the plans formed from previous hurri- cane experiences that Were put into operation with the threat of Hurri- cane Betsy; and it was this set of emergency procedures that had to undergo adjustments to Che unexpected flooding. In order to conprehend the initial set of organizational responses to the hurricane threat, it is helpful to understand the concept of a "disaster subculture." New Orleans , along with other Gulf Coast cities, has undergone repeated--almost annual--hurricar,e threats. Studies con- ducted in communities that experience predictable disruptions (i.e., annual floods or hurricanes) have shown that organizations learn to adopt activities so that appropriate action can be taken to conbat the dis aster . The concept of subculture refers to those identifiable variations - in the more general and pervasive cultural themes and patterns -? characteristic of a given society. Subcultures exist when certain groups of people come to share rather distinctive cultural charac- teristics which set them off, or differentiate then, from other groups ...Thus, a disaster subculture may be defined as those sub- cultural patterns operative in a given area which are geared towards the solution of problems, both social and nonsocial, arising from the awareness of som form of almost periodic disaster threat. (Anderson, 1965: 3) The period from Juae 1 to the end of November is designated as the hurricane setison. Shortly after June 1, all city goverrment emergency- oriented departments with the military, nedical, and allied agencies meet to review emergency plans and to inform each other of organizational changes. This is known as the mayor's Disaster Survival Committee. These annual meetings illustrate the repetitive responses typical of a disaster subculture. Maxy of the adaptationa that organizations made to the threat and impact of Hurricane Betsy had been learned responses developed from previous hurricane experiences. However, with each new dioaster ex- perience, additional knowledge is gathered to more effectively plan and cope with these disruptions. Throughout the mnograph, references will be nade to previous plans and adaptations that organizations have found to be useful from past disaster experience. -2- Data Collection In studying organized behavior in disasters, the Disaster Research Center (DRC) has developed a fourfold typology classifying organizations according to their structure and tasks. The four organizational types are establirhed, expanding, extending, and emergent organizations. Established organizations maintain their existing structure and generally continue their nmnslly assigned taskn during an emergency period (e.g., telephone company, public utilities, police and fire departments).
Recommended publications
  • 19810013173.Pdf
    N O T I C E THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED FROM MICROFICHE. ALTHOUGH IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT CERTAIN PORTIONS ARE ILLEGIBLE, IT IS BEING RELEASED IN THE INTEREST OF MAKING AVAILABLE AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE ^, r7 F- a t ^^ yF { a i lit Technical Memorandum 80596 i zi t Tropical Cyclone Rainfall Characteristics as determined from a Satellite Passive Microwave Radiometer E. B. Rodgers and R. F. Adler Nq A Scf, ^Et1 dtrC'wQre DECEMBER 1979 APR 1991 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 (NASA—TM-•80596) TOPICAL CYCLONE RAINFALL N81-21703 CHARACTERISTI C S AS DETERMINED FROM A SATELLITE PASSIVE MICBORAVE :RADIOMETER (NAS A) 48 P HC Ana/MF A01 CSCL 04.B UUclaa G 3/47 41970 I. Tropical Cyclone Rainfall Characteristics As Determined From a Satellite Passive Microwave Radiometer Edward B. i odgas and Robert F. Adler Laboratory for Atmospheric Sciences (GLAS) Goddard Space Flight Center National Aeronautics and Space Administration Greenbelt, MD 20771 ABSTRACT Data from the Nimbus-5 Electrically Scanning Microwave Radiometer (ESMR-S) have been used to calculate latent licat release (LHR) and other rainfall parameters for over 70 satellite obser- vations of 21 tropical cyclones during 1973, 1974, and 1975 in the tropical North Pacific Ocean. The results indicate that the ESMR-5 measurements can be useful in determining the rainfall charac- teristics of these storms and appear to be potentially use"ul in monitoring as well as predicting their intensity. The ESMR-5 derived total tropical cyclone rainfall estimates agree favorably with pre- vious estimates for both the disturbance and typhoon stages.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Hurricane Katrina
    PARTPART 33 IMPACTIMPACT OFOF HURRICANESHURRICANES ONON NEWNEW ORLEANSORLEANS ANDAND THETHE GULFGULF COASTCOAST 19001900--19981998 HURRICANEHURRICANE--CAUSEDCAUSED FLOODINGFLOODING OFOF NEWNEW ORLEANSORLEANS •• SinceSince 1559,1559, 172172 hurricaneshurricanes havehave struckstruck southernsouthern LouisianaLouisiana ((ShallatShallat,, 2000).2000). •• OfOf these,these, 3838 havehave causedcaused floodingflooding inin NewNew thethe OrleansOrleans area,area, usuallyusually viavia LakeLake PonchartrainPonchartrain.. •• SomeSome ofof thethe moremore notablenotable eventsevents havehave included:included: SomeSome ofof thethe moremore notablenotable eventsevents havehave included:included: 1812,1812, 1831,1831, 1860,1860, 1915,1915, 1947,1947, 1965,1965, 1969,1969, andand 20052005.. IsaacIsaac MonroeMonroe ClineCline USWS meteorologist Isaac Monroe Cline pioneered the study of tropical cyclones and hurricanes in the early 20th Century, by recording barometric pressures, storm surges, and wind velocities. •• Cline charted barometric gradients (right) and tracked the eyes of hurricanes as they approached landfall. This shows the event of Sept 29, 1915 hitting the New Orleans area. • Storm or tidal surges are caused by lifting of the oceanic surface by abnormal low atmospheric pressure beneath the eye of a hurricane. The faster the winds, the lower the pressure; and the greater the storm surge. At its peak, Hurricane Katrina caused a surge 53 feet high under its eye as it approached the Louisiana coast, triggering a storm surge advisory of 18 to 28 feet in New Orleans (image from USA Today). StormStorm SurgeSurge •• The surge effect is minimal in the open ocean, because the water falls back on itself •• As the storm makes landfall, water is lifted onto the continent, locally elevating the sea level, much like a tsunami, but with much higher winds Images from USA Today •• Cline showed that it was then northeast quadrant of a cyclonic event that produced the greatest storm surge, in accordance with the drop in barometric pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1
    Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1: Historical Pier Damage in Florida Ralph R. Clark Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems May 2010 Table of Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... ii Chapter 1 – Introduction................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 – Ocean and Gulf Pier Damages in Florida................................................... 4 Chapter 3 – Three Major Hurricanes of the Late 1970’s............................................... 6 September 23, 1975 – Hurricane Eloise ...................................................................... 6 September 3, 1979 – Hurricane David ........................................................................ 6 September 13, 1979 – Hurricane Frederic.................................................................. 7 Chapter 4 – Two Hurricanes and Four Storms of the 1980’s........................................ 8 June 18, 1982 – No Name Storm.................................................................................. 8 November 21-24, 1984 – Thanksgiving Storm............................................................ 8 August 30-September 1, 1985 – Hurricane Elena ...................................................... 9 October 31,
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms
    FLORIDA HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS 1871-1995: An Historical Survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams '+wcCopy~~ I~BN 0-912747-08-0 Florida SeaGrant College is supported by award of the Office of Sea Grant, NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce,grant number NA 36RG-0070, under provisions of the NationalSea Grant College and Programs Act of 1966. This information is published by the Sea Grant Extension Program which functionsas a coinponentof the Florida Cooperative Extension Service, John T. Woeste, Dean, in conducting Cooperative Extensionwork in Agriculture, Home Economics, and Marine Sciences,State of Florida, U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, U.S. Departmentof Commerce, and Boards of County Commissioners, cooperating.Printed and distributed in furtherance af the Actsof Congressof May 8 andJune 14, 1914.The Florida Sea Grant Collegeis an Equal Opportunity-AffirmativeAction employer authorizedto provide research, educational information and other servicesonly to individuals and institutions that function without regardto race,color, sex, age,handicap or nationalorigin. Coverphoto: Hank Brandli & Rob Downey LOANCOPY ONLY Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms 1871-1995: An Historical survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams Division of Marine and Environmental Systems, Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, FL 32901 Technical Paper - 71 June 1994 $5.00 Copies may be obtained from: Florida Sea Grant College Program University of Florida Building 803 P.O. Box 110409 Gainesville, FL 32611-0409 904-392-2801 II Our friend andcolleague, Fred Doehringpictured below, died on January 5, 1993, before this manuscript was completed. Until his death, Fred had spent the last 18 months painstakingly researchingdata for this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Looting After a Disaster: a Myth Or Reality?
    Volume XXXI • Number 4 March 2007 Disaster Myths...Fourth in a Series Looting After a Disaster: A Myth or Reality? his special article in the Disaster Myths series pres- among those concerned with public safety and response Tents a point-counterpoint on the signifi cance and in disasters. prevalence of looting a� er disasters. Both authors were The fi rst author, E.L. Quarantelli, provides a his- asked to answer, independently, a series of questions, torical overview of looting in disaster research to help including whether looting a� er disasters is a myth, elucidate the myth. The fi ndings of previous disaster what evidence supports that opinion, what previous research are used to support the argument that looting, research has established about looting, and how the in fact, is not prevalent a� er disasters. In the end, there myths (and realities) about looting infl uence disaster is a lack of evidence showing that this behavior is com- planning and response. While the previous articles in monplace. This article can be found on page 2. this series were meant to help dispel disaster myths, As a counterpoint, Kelly Frailing focuses on the this article demonstrates the debate surrounding the events following Hurricane Katrina as evidence that controversial issue of looting and explores it in greater looting is not a myth, but a reality of disasters. This po- depth. Together these positions reveal the arguments sition is also supported by experience during previous and evidence for both sides of the debate. The editors events, such as Hurricane Betsy, and by crime statistics.
    [Show full text]
  • HURRICANE Betsy Track Aug
    UPS. Weather Bureau, WW~icane Betsy, August 27-Sept . 12, 1.65... U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ENVIRONMENT L SCIENCE SERVICES ADMlNlSTkATlON % ,j. WEATHER BUREAU CANE BTETZ~SX Prelimi~yReport wilh Advisorks and Bulletins Issued WASHINGTON, D. C. SEPT National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Weather Bureau Hurricane Series ERRATA NOTICE One or more conditions of the original document may affect the quality of the image, such as: Discolored pages Faded or light ink Binding intrudes into the text This has been a co-operative project between the NOAA Central Library and the Climate Database Modernization Program, National Climate Data Center (NCDC). To view the original document contact the NOAA Central Library in Silver Spring, MD at (301) 7 13-2607 x124 or Libra~y.Keference(u~noaa.gov. HOV Services Imaging Contractor 12200 Kiln Court Beltsville, MD 20704-1 387 November 6,2007 HURRICANE Betsy Track Aug. 21 - Sept. 12,1965 Minimum Surface Pressure and Maximum Surface W~nd Mlnlrnum Surface Pressure and Max~mumSurlace W~nd Stippled area represents area traversed by radar eye. - 8 2' 8 6' 84' 4 I , 80' MIAMI-KEY WEST-TAMPA'I6 I COMBINED RADAR TRACK OF HURRICANE BETSY SEPTEMBER 6-9, 1965 Radar eye boundary Radar center track Stippled area represents area traversed by radar eye. &ELIMINARY REPORT ON I:URRICANE BETSY August 27 - September 10, 1965 On August 27, 1965 at 10:30 AM EST a Navy hurricane reconnaissance aircraft discovered a tropical depression at 13' North Latitude and 54' West Longitude or about 350 miles east southeast of Barbados in the Windward Islands, West Indies.
    [Show full text]
  • Meteorological Conditions Over Puerto Rico During Hurricane Betsy, 1956 Jos~A
    FEBRUARY1959 MOXTHLY WEATHER REVIEW 69 METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS OVER PUERTO RICO DURING HURRICANE BETSY, 1956 JOS~A. COL~N US.Weather Bureau, San Juan,P.R.’ (Manuscript received January 28, 1958; revised November 28, 19581 ABSTRACT The observations of wind, pressure, rainfall, and radar bands recorded orer Puerto Rico during the passage of HurricaneBetsy are presented and discussed. Thetrack of thehurricane across the Atlantic and eastern Caribbean Sea, which shows an apparent sinusoidal oscillation around the mean path, is also included. The radar obserrations are used to obtain the detailed path of the hurricane across Puerto Rico and to study the changes in the structure of the precipitation bands that resulted from the passage over the mountainous section. Photo- graphs are presented to illustrate the rariations in the radar structure. Some inferences are made in regard to the changes in the intensity of the wind and pressure fields. It is shown that snme weakening of the wind field and filling of the central pressure occurred with motion over the land area, and that rapid deepening followed as soon as the humicane mored orer mater on the north side of the island. The rainfall observations are compared with those recorded in the great “Sam Felipe” hurricane of September 13, 1925. 1. INTRODUCTION 2. SYNOPTIC HISTORY On August 12, 1956, hurricane Betsy, the second tropi- Hurricane Betsy mas detected on August 9, 1956, near cal storm of the season, moved across the island of Puerto 1at.itude 14” N, longitude 49” W. withthe aid of ship Rico. It mas the first hurricane to pass direct,ly over the reports [ 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Perspective
    kZ ­­_!% L , Ti Historical Perspective 2.1 Introduction CROSS REFERENCE Through the years, FEMA, other Federal agencies, State and For resources that augment local agencies, and other private groups have documented and the guidance and other evaluated the effects of coastal flood and wind events and the information in this Manual, performance of buildings located in coastal areas during those see the Residential Coastal Construction Web site events. These evaluations provide a historical perspective on the siting, design, and construction of buildings along the Atlantic, Pacific, Gulf of Mexico, and Great Lakes coasts. These studies provide a baseline against which the effects of later coastal flood events can be measured. Within this context, certain hurricanes, coastal storms, and other coastal flood events stand out as being especially important, either Hurricane categories reported because of the nature and extent of the damage they caused or in this Manual should be because of particular flaws they exposed in hazard identification, interpreted cautiously. Storm siting, design, construction, or maintenance practices. Many of categorization based on wind speed may differ from that these events—particularly those occurring since 1979—have been based on barometric pressure documented by FEMA in Flood Damage Assessment Reports, or storm surge. Also, storm Building Performance Assessment Team (BPAT) reports, and effects vary geographically— Mitigation Assessment Team (MAT) reports. These reports only the area near the point of summarize investigations that FEMA conducts shortly after landfall will experience effects associated with the reported major disasters. Drawing on the combined resources of a Federal, storm category. State, local, and private sector partnership, a team of investigators COASTAL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL 2-1 2 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE is tasked with evaluating the performance of buildings and related infrastructure in response to the effects of natural and man-made hazards.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 09/28/21 10:59 AM UTC 1 76 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW Vol
    March 1965 Gordon E. Dunn and Staff 175 THEHURRICANE SEASON OF 1964 GORDON E. DUNN AND STAFF* U.S. Weather Bureau Office, Miami, Fla. 1. GENERALSUMMARY spondvery well withthe composite chart for atverage Twelvetropical cyclones,six of hurricaneintensity, departures from nornml for seasons of maxinlum tropical developedover tropical Atlantic waters during 1964. cycloneincidence inthe southeastern United States as This is the largest number since 1955 and compares with developed by Ballenzweig [a]. an average of 10during the past three decades. The September was aneven more active month and cor- centers of four hurricanes penetrated the mainland of the respondence between Ballenzweig'scomposite chrt and United States, the largest number to do so since the five theobserved values was better, particularly south of in 1933. There have been only four other years with four latitude 40' W. According toGreen [3] thesubtropical or more since 1900; four in 1906, 1909, and 1926, and six High was abnornlallystrong and displacedslightly in 1916.While none of thefour renching the mainland northwardfrom normal (favorable for tropical cyclone in 1964 wits :L major hurricane at the time of landfall, formation) while the 700-mb. jet was slightlysouth of three-Cleo, Dora, and EIi1da"were severe. normal (unfavorable). The long-wave position fluctuated Florida was struck by three hurricanes in addition to back and forth from the Rockies and Great Plains east- dyinghurricane Hilda and one tropical cyclone of less ward and the tropical cyclones experienced considerable than hurricane intensity; thus ended an unequalled rela- difficulty in penetrating the westerlies. During the major tively hurricane-free period of 13 years from 1951 through hurricanemonths in 1964 the long-wavetrough failed 1963.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Salinization in the Lower Florida Keys Following Hurricane Irma Storm Surge
    Effects of rising seas and recent hurricanes on coastal wetlands in the lower Florida Keys Danielle E. Ogurcak and Michael S. Ross Florida International University, Miami, FL Coastal Wetlands on 8 of the lower Florida Keys Max elevation ~ 2 meters Zhang et al. 2010 Max elevation ~ 5 meters Predicted increases in sea level rise and frequency of Cat 3 - 5 hurricanes in the 21st century Sweet et al. 2017 AP Photo/J. Pat Carter Bender et al. 2010 www.srh.noaa.gov 2018 SLAMM Modeling Results Warren Pinnacle Consulting, Model runs at Stetson University 1 ft SLR 2 ft SLR 3 ft SLR Miller & Traxler, USFWS, GEER 2019 (Halley et al. 1993) Conceptual Model of Freshwater Lens Precipitation Transpiration Well Sea level Fresh Ghyben- Brackish Brackish Sea water Herzberg Lens Coastal Forest Communities of the Lower Florida Keys Hardwood Hammock Freshwater Supratidal wetland Scrub Mangrove forests, Pine Rockland woodlands, & scrublands Water table Fresh Increasingly brackish Increasingly brackish Jul 2010 Have recent hurricanes served as tipping points? Annual Sea Level at Key West Tide Gauge (1913 – 2013) Major Hurricanes Impacting the Lower Keys (1965 – 2019) Betsy 1965: Cat 3 storm at landfall in Key Largo, 125 mph winds on Big Pine Key, surge of 2.7 m documented at Sugarloaf Key Inez 1966: Cat 3 storm, with 150 mph winds estimated on Big Pine Key, above normal tides (1.5m) Georges 1998: Cat 2 storm at landfall in Key West, 90-100 mph winds, storm surge from Atlantic of 5 - 6 ft Wilma 2005: Cat 3 storm at landfall near Naples, 110mph winds , 2 storm surges – first from the Atlantic of 4 - 5 ft, second from Florida Bay of 6 - 8 ft, highest surge in Florida Keys since Hurricane Betsy (1965) (NOAA NWS).
    [Show full text]
  • Harvey, Irma, and the NFIP: Did the 2017 Hurricane Season Matter to Flood Insurance Reauthorization?
    University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review Volume 40 Issue 4 The Ben J. Altheimer Symposium: The Law and Unnatural Disasters: Legal Adaptations Article 1 to Climate Change 2018 Harvey, Irma, and the NFIP: Did the 2017 Hurricane Season Matter to Flood Insurance Reauthorization? Robin Kundis Craig Follow this and additional works at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview Part of the Environmental Law Commons, and the Insurance Law Commons Recommended Citation Robin Kundis Craig, Harvey, Irma, and the NFIP: Did the 2017 Hurricane Season Matter to Flood Insurance Reauthorization?, 40 U. ARK. LITTLE ROCK L. REV. 481 (2018). Available at: https://lawrepository.ualr.edu/lawreview/vol40/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review by an authorized editor of Bowen Law Repository: Scholarship & Archives. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HARVEY, IRMA, AND THE NFIP: DID THE 2017 HURRICANE SEASON MATTER TO FLOOD INSURANCE REAUTHORIZATION? Robin Kundis Craig* I. INTRODUCTION In April 2014, Farmers Insurance Company filed nine high-profile class-action lawsuits on behalf of itself, other insurance companies, and policyholders with damaged properties against approximately 200 Chicago- area municipalities, arguing that those municipalities were failing to deal with climate change.1 Specifically, Farmers Insurance alleged that these cities and counties were aware that
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms, 1871-1993: an Historical Survey, the Only Books Or Reports Exclu- Sively on Florida Hurricanes Were R.W
    3. 2b -.I 3 Contents List of Tables, Figures, and Plates, ix Foreword, xi Preface, xiii Chapter 1. Introduction, 1 Chapter 2. Historical Discussion of Florida Hurricanes, 5 1871-1900, 6 1901-1930, 9 1931-1960, 16 1961-1990, 24 Chapter 3. Four Years and Billions of Dollars Later, 36 1991, 36 1992, 37 1993, 42 1994, 43 Chapter 4. Allison to Roxanne, 47 1995, 47 Chapter 5. Hurricane Season of 1996, 54 Appendix 1. Hurricane Preparedness, 56 Appendix 2. Glossary, 61 References, 63 Tables and Figures, 67 Plates, 129 Index of Named Hurricanes, 143 Subject Index, 144 About the Authors, 147 Tables, Figures, and Plates Tables, 67 1. Saffir/Simpson Scale, 67 2. Hurricane Classification Prior to 1972, 68 3. Number of Hurricanes, Tropical Storms, and Combined Total Storms by 10-Year Increments, 69 4. Florida Hurricanes, 1871-1996, 70 Figures, 84 l A-I. Great Miami Hurricane 2A-B. Great Lake Okeechobee Hurricane 3A-C.Great Labor Day Hurricane 4A-C. Hurricane Donna 5. Hurricane Cleo 6A-B. Hurricane Betsy 7A-C. Hurricane David 8. Hurricane Elena 9A-C. Hurricane Juan IOA-B. Hurricane Kate 1 l A-J. Hurricane Andrew 12A-C. Hurricane Albert0 13. Hurricane Beryl 14A-D. Hurricane Gordon 15A-C. Hurricane Allison 16A-F. Hurricane Erin 17A-B. Hurricane Jerry 18A-G. Hurricane Opal I9A. 1995 Hurricane Season 19B. Five 1995 Storms 20. Hurricane Josephine , Plates, X29 1. 1871-1880 2. 1881-1890 Foreword 3. 1891-1900 4. 1901-1910 5. 1911-1920 6. 1921-1930 7. 1931-1940 These days, nothing can escape the watchful, high-tech eyes of the National 8.
    [Show full text]