DOCSLIB.ORG

Carrier Ethernet Tutorial

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Carrier Ethernet Tutorial CarrierCarrier . EthernetEthernet Raj Jain Washington University in Saint Louis Saint Louis, MO 63130 [email protected] These slides and audio/video recordings of this class lecture are at: http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-1 OverviewOverview 1. Technologies for Data Center Interconnection: PDH, SDH, MPLS, PWE3 2. Metro Ethernet Services: E-Line, E-LAN, E-Tree, E-Access 3. Administration and Management Ethernet Services 4. Extensions to Ethernet for carriers: PB (Q-in-Q), PBB (MAC-in-MAC), PBB-TE Note: Although these technologies were originally developed for carriers, they are now used inside multi-tenant data centers (clouds) Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-2 OptionsOptions toto ConnectConnect TwoTwo DataData Centers?Centers? Danforth Campus Medical Campus 1. Dedicated Optical fiber (leased from the phone company) 2. Ethernet over Optical Transport Network (all-Optical Switches) 3. Ethernet over Wavelength Division Multiplexing (DWDM) 4. Ethernet over Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) 5. Ethernet over Plesiochronous Hierarchy (PDH) 6. Ethernet over Pseudo-wire over MPLS 7. Ethernet over Micro-wave 8. Single Pair High-Speed Digital Subscriber Line (SHDSL) 9. Ethernet with enhancements Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-3 PlesiochronousPlesiochronous DigitalDigital HierarchyHierarchy (PDH)(PDH) Plesios + Synchronous = Near synchronous Phone Line = 64 kbps = 1 User channel North America T1 = 1.544 Mbps = 24 User channels T1 T2 = 6.312 Mbps = 96 Channels T3 = 44.736 Mbps = 480 Channels Europe: E1 = 2.048 Mbps = 32 Channels E2 = 8.448 Mbps = 128 Channels E3 = 139.264 Mbps = 2048 Channels Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-4 SONET/SDHSONET/SDH E S S E Ethernet S S SDH SONET=Synchronous optical network Standard for digital optical transmission Standardized by ANSI and then by ITU Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH) Protection: Allows redundant Line or paths Fast Restoration: 50ms using rings Sophisticated management Ideal for Voice: No queues. Guaranteed delay Fixed Payload Rates: OC1=51.84 Mbps, OC3=155M, OC12=622M, OC48=2.4G, OC192=9.5G Rates do not match data rates of 10M, 100M, 1G, 10G Static rates not suitable for bursty traffic One Payload per Stream High Cost Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-5 MultiprotocolMultiprotocol LabelLabel SwitchingSwitching (MPLS)(MPLS) PBXPBX PBXPBX 1 3 5 2 3 Allows virtual circuits in IP Networks (May 1996) Each packet has a virtual circuit number called ‘label’ Label determines the packet’s queuing and forwarding Circuits are called Label Switched Paths (LSPs) LSP’s have to be set up before use Allows traffic engineering Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-6 LabelLabel SwitchingSwitching ExampleExample Ethernet Header IP Header Payload Ethernet Header Label IP Header Payload 64 3 5 <64> A R1 <3> <5> R3 C B R2 <2> <5> <3> 5 3 2 Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-7 IPIP overover MPLSMPLS overover EthernetEthernet PE= Provider Edge CE PE Carrier Network PE CE CE = Customer Edge Dest. Adr Src. Type MPLS Customer Customer L3 CRC Next Hop Adr /Len Tag Dest. MAC Adr Src. MAC Adr PDU 48b 48b 16b 32b 48b 48b 32b Label Experimental Stack Position Time CoS/Drop-Preced. 1 Bottom to Live 20b 3b 1b 8b Allows 220 Label switched paths (LSP) Each path can have reserved capacity MPLS became a very popular Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-8 MartiniMartini DraftDraft 1995-1999: IP over ATM, IP over Ethernet L3 IP L2 Ethernet ATM PPP 2000+: ATM over IP, Ethernet over IP SONET over IP L2 Ethernet ATM PPP L3 IP Idea proposed by Luca Martini of Level 3 Communications and then Cisco Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-9 PseudoPseudo Wire:Wire: L2L2 CircuitsCircuits overover IPIP CE1 PE1 PE2 CE2 Pseudo Wire Emulated Service ATM ATM Network Network A B Frame Relay Frame Relay Network Network IP Network Ethernet Ethernet Tunnel Hdr Demux Field [Control] ATM ATM ATM ATM Payload Type How to de-assemble payload MPLS/GRE/L2TP - How to get to egress Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-10 EthernetEthernet overover PWE3PWE3 overover MPLSMPLS MPLS Label PW Label [Control] Ethernet Frame w/o FCS PID Flags FRG Length Sequence # PW1 4b 4b 2b 6b 16b MPLS PW2 Pseudo-Wire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) LSP Multiple pseudo-wires per MPLS LSP PW3 Payload ID (PID): 5=Untagged Ethernet, 4=VLAN tagged, … 4 VLAN tag put by carrier and customers may or may not be relevent for forwarding. Determined administratively by PE. Flags: Payload specific. FRG: Used for fragmentation Pause frames are obeyed locally. Not transported. May put 802.1p priority in exp field of MPLS label Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-11 VirtualVirtual PrivatePrivate LANLAN ServiceService (VPLS)(VPLS) Allows multi-point Ethernet services over MPLS networks using pseudo-wires Non-Hierarchical VPLS: Edge routers do complete routing table, label distribution, multicast/broadcast replication Suitable for small deployments Hierarchical VPLS (H-VPLS): Edge routers communicate with only other edge devices and do not have large routing tables Suitable for large deployments A CE PE PE CE B CE: Customer Edge B CE PE PE CE A PE: Provider Edge A CE PE Service PE CE B Provider Ref: H. Saboowala, M. Abid, S. Modali, "Designing Networks and Services for the Cloud: Delivering business-grade cloud applications and services," Cisco Press 2013, ISBN:1587142945 Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-12 DifferentiatedDifferentiated ServicesServices A way for IP routers to provide QoS Expedited Forwarding (EF): Also known as Premium Service Virtual leased line Guaranteed minimum service rate Policed: Arrival rate < Minimum Service Rate Not affected by other forwarding classes Assured Forwarding (AF): Four Classes: No particular ordering Three drop preference per class: Low, Medium, High Best Effort Service Differentiated Service Code Point (6 bits) encode the service, E.g., 101110 = EF Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-13 CarriersCarriers vs.vs. EnterpriseEnterprise We need to exchange topology for Sorry, We can’t tell you optimal routing. anything about our internal network. Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-14 Issue:Issue: UNIUNI vsvs PeerPeer--toto--PeerPeer SignalingSignaling Two Business Models: Carrier: Overlay or cloud Network is a black-box User-to-network interface (UNI) to create/destroy light paths (in OIF) Enterprise: Peer-to-Peer Complete exchange of information UNI UNI Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-15 UNIUNI vs.vs. ENNIENNI User to Network Interface (UNI): Separates responsibilities between the user and the provider. (Troubleshooting, failures etc). Like the wired phone box outside your home. Only one customer’s traffic. External Network to Network Interface (ENNI): Separates responsibilities between two providers. Many customer’s traffic passes through an ENNI Tier 2 operators sell services to Tier 3 service providers. Customer UNI Provider 1 ENNI Provider 2 Tier 3 Tier 2 Ref: Fujitsu, “Carrier Ethernet Essentials,” http://www.fujitsu.com/downloads/TEL/fnc/whitepapers/CarrierEthernetEssentials.pdf Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-16 OperatorOperator VirtualVirtual ConnectionConnection (OVC)(OVC) Between UNI and ENNI or between two ENNIs. For wholesale service providers Two types: Point-to-Point and Multipoint-to-Multipoint Untagged or single tagged frames at NNI. Q-in-Q at ENNI UNIs may be 10 to 100 Mbps. ENNIs at 1 to 10 Gbps. UNI UNI ENNI ENNI UNI ENNI ENNI UNI Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-17 MetroMetro AccessAccess EthernetEthernet PrivatePrivate LineLine Access Ethernet Private Line (Access-EPL): Port-based service for Internet access Like the service at your home. Ends at your access provider, where many other Access- EPLs may end Access provider has only one interface Shared by many Access-EPLs Different from p2p EPL. Customer 1 ENNI Customer n E-Access Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-18 EndEnd--toto--EndEnd MetroMetro EthernetEthernet ConnectionConnection An EC may go through multiple service providers Multiple OVCs can be concatenated to create an EC ENNI ENNI Wholesale Wholesale Retail Access Provider Transport Provider Service Provider UNI OVC1 OVC2 OVC3 UNI Subscriber Subscriber EC Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-13/ ©2013 Raj Jain 7-19 EthernetEthernet VirtualVirtual ConnectionsConnections (EVCs)(EVCs) Port-based ECs: Forwarding not based on VLANs. Frames delivered to remote UNI/ENNI for P2P or Based on destination address for P2MP VLAN-based ECs: Forwarding based on VLAN tag. Multiple Virtual UNIs Ethernet Virtual Connection (EVC) More cost-effective for Enterprise customers EVC Types of EVCs: UNI EVC 1. Ethernet Virtual Private Line (EVPL) 2. Ethernet Virtual Private Tree (EVP-Tree) EVC 3. Ethernet Virtual Private LAN (EVPLAN) 4. Access Ethernet Virtual Private Line (Access EVPL) Note: Service providers always share an ENNI for multiple connections OVCs are always virtual No OCs Washington University in St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Ttethernet for Integrated Fault-Tolerant Spacecraft Networks
    On TTEthernet for Integrated Fault-Tolerant Spacecraft Networks Andrew Loveless∗ NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, 77058 There has recently been a push for adopting integrated modular avionics (IMA) princi- ples in designing spacecraft architectures. This consolidation of multiple vehicle functions to shared computing platforms can significantly reduce spacecraft cost, weight, and de- sign complexity. Ethernet technology is attractive for inclusion in more integrated avionic systems due to its high speed, flexibility, and the availability of inexpensive commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components. Furthermore, Ethernet can be augmented with a variety of quality of service (QoS) enhancements that enable its use for transmitting critical data. TTEthernet introduces a decentralized clock synchronization paradigm enabling the use of time-triggered Ethernet messaging appropriate for hard real-time applications. TTEther- net can also provide two forms of event-driven communication, therefore accommodating the full spectrum of traffic criticality levels required in IMA architectures. This paper explores the application of TTEthernet technology to future IMA spacecraft architectures as part of the Avionics and Software (A&S) project chartered by NASA's Advanced Ex- ploration Systems (AES) program. Nomenclature A&S = Avionics and Software Project AA2 = Ascent Abort 2 AES = Advanced Exploration Systems Program ANTARES = Advanced NASA Technology Architecture for Exploration Studies API = Application Program Interface ARM = Asteroid Redirect Mission
    [Show full text]
  • Data Center Ethernet 2
    DataData CenterCenter EthernetEthernet Raj Jain Washington University in Saint Louis Saint Louis, MO 63130 [email protected] These slides and audio/video recordings of this class lecture are at: http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-15/ Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-15/ ©2015 Raj Jain 4-1 OverviewOverview 1. Residential vs. Data Center Ethernet 2. Review of Ethernet Addresses, devices, speeds, algorithms 3. Enhancements to Spanning Tree Protocol 4. Virtual LANs 5. Data Center Bridging Extensions Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-15/ ©2015 Raj Jain 4-2 Quiz:Quiz: TrueTrue oror False?False? Which of the following statements are generally true? T F p p Ethernet is a local area network (Local < 2km) p p Token ring, Token Bus, and CSMA/CD are the three most common LAN access methods. p p Ethernet uses CSMA/CD. p p Ethernet bridges use spanning tree for packet forwarding. p p Ethernet frames are 1518 bytes. p p Ethernet does not provide any delay guarantees. p p Ethernet has no congestion control. p p Ethernet has strict priorities. Washington University in St. Louis http://www.cse.wustl.edu/~jain/cse570-15/ ©2015 Raj Jain 4-3 ResidentialResidential vs.vs. DataData CenterCenter EthernetEthernet Residential Data Center Distance: up to 200m r No limit Scale: Few MAC addresses r Millions of MAC Addresses 4096 VLANs r Millions of VLANs Q-in-Q Protection: Spanning tree r Rapid spanning tree, … (Gives 1s, need 50ms) Path determined by r Traffic engineered path spanning tree Simple service r Service Level Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • MPLS-Based Metro Ethernet Networks a Tutorial • Paresh Khatri • 2018
    MPLS-based Metro Ethernet Networks A tutorial • Paresh Khatri • 2018 1 © Nokia 2017 Public Agenda 1. Introduction 2. Introduction to Metro Ethernet Services 3. Traditional Metro Ethernet networks 4. Delivering Ethernet over MPLS 5. Summary 6. Questions 2 © Nokia 2017 Public introduction 3 © Nokia 2017 Public Introduction • Paresh Khatri ([email protected]) - Chief Architect – IP Routing & Transport APAC, Alcatel-Lucent • Key focus areas: - End-to-end network architectures - SDN/NFV - Large-scale IP/MPLS networks - L2/L3 VPNs - Carrier Ethernet - Next-generation mobile backhaul networks • Acknowledgements: - Some figures and text are provided courtesy of the Metro Ethernet Forum (MEF) 4 © Nokia 2017 Public introduction to metro ethernet services 5 © Nokia 2017 Public AGenda 2. Introduction to Metro Ethernet Services a) Why Metro Ethernet ? b) Attributes of Carrier Ethernet c) Carrier Ethernet Services defined by the MEF 6 © Nokia 2017 Public 2.1 Why Metro Ethernet ? 7 © Nokia 2017 Public Introduction to Metro Ethernet Services What is Metro Ethernet ? “… generally defined as the network that bridges or connects geographically separated enterprise LANs while also connecting across the WAN or backbone networks that are generally owned by service providers. The Metro Ethernet Networks provide connectivity services across Metro geography utilising Ethernet as the core protocol and enabling broadband applications” from “Metro Ethernet Networks – A Technical Overview” from the Metro Ethernet Forum 8 © Nokia 2017 Public Introduction to Metro
    [Show full text]
  • PROFINET for Network Geeks
    PROFINET for Network Geeks (and those who want to be) Introduction PROFINET is an open Industrial Ethernet standard. It is a communication protocol that exchanges data between automation controllers and devices. With over 25 million installed nodes (as of 2018), PROFINET is one of the most widely used Industrial Ethernet standards worldwide. But even though millions of users are familiar with PROFINET, not all users understand how it works. This white paper starts with a brief overview of Ethernet and the 7-layer ISO-OSI model. Then, it describes how PROFINET’s 3 communication channels fit in the model: TCP/IP and UDP/IP, Real-Time (RT), and Isochronous Real-Time (IRT). 1 Ethernet The transition from using 4-20 mA analog signals for I/O communication to digital fieldbuses provided the benefits of reduced wiring, access to network data, and robust diagnostics. The later transition from digital fieldbuses to Ethernet was also similarly a shift to a more modern technology. Ethernet incorporated and improved upon the benefits of fieldbuses. Ethernet is ubiquitous and PROFINET uses standard Ethernet. Ethernet gives PROFINET the ability to provide faster updates, more bandwidth, larger messages, an unlimited address space, and even more diagnostic capabilities. Also, as commercial Ethernet evolves, PROFINET can take advantage of these physical layer improvements. Figure 1 ISO-OSI Model The ISO-OSI Model Ethernet-based communications can be represented by a seven-layer model: the ISO/OSI Reference Model. The model generically describes the means and methods used to transmit data. Each layer has a specific name and function, as shown in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Generating Synthetic Voip Traffic for Analyzing Redundant Openbsd
    UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Department of Informatics Generating Synthetic VoIP Traffic for Analyzing Redundant OpenBSD-Firewalls Master Thesis Maurice David Woernhard May 23, 2006 Generating Synthetic VoIP Traffic for Analyzing Redundant OpenBSD-Firewalls Maurice David Woernhard May 23, 2006 Abstract Voice over IP, short VoIP, is among the fastest growing broadband technologies in the private and commercial sector. Compared to the Plain Old Telephone System (POTS), Internet telephony has reduced availability, measured in uptime guarantees per a given time period. This thesis makes a contribution towards proper quantitative statements about network availability when using two redun- dant, state synchronized computers, acting as firewalls between the Internet (WAN) and the local area network (LAN). First, methods for generating adequate VoIP traffic volumes for loading a Gigabit Ethernet link are examined, with the goal of using a minimal set of hardware, namely one regular desktop computer. pktgen, the Linux kernel UDP packet generator, was chosen for generating synthetic/artificial traffic, reflecting the common VoIP packet characteristics packet size, changing sender and receiver address, as well as typical UDP-port usage. pktgen’s three main parameters influencing the generation rate are fixed inter-packet delay, packet size and total packet count. It was sought to relate these to more user-friendly val- ues of amount of simultaneous calls, voice codec employed and call duration. The proposed method fails to model VoIP traffic accurately, mostly due to the cur- rently unstable nature of pktgen. However, it is suited for generating enough packets for testing the firewalls. Second, the traffic forwarding limit and failover behavior of the redun- dant, state-synchronized firewalls was examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating Network Migration Challenges: Upgrade Your 1GE
    Navigating Network Migration Challenges: Upgrade Your 1GE Metro Ethernet Access Network to 10GE A White Paper from Telco Systems Upgrade Your 1GE Metro Ethernet Access Network to 10GE | 2 Intoduction Many businesses and service providers are migrating from • Service providers are finding it more difficult to live up to 1GE to 10GE networks as they attempt to avoid the obstacles their customers’ service level agreements (SLA) to presented by heavy bandwidth, while leveraging the benefits provide multiple services, which require more bandwidth that 10GE networking has to offer. The requirement for • Generating more revenue within the current limits of a more bandwidth has become a constant battle. As internet 1Gig network usage continues to increase with the popularity of data and streaming services, so does the demand for more bandwidth. As the gap between service revenues and the demand for From education (homework, e-learning, campus networks), higher bandwidth grows, providers are looking for ways to finance (online banking, stock trading, bill pay), and business better control their expenses while offering higher bandwidth purposes (company intranets, remote workers), to social media and more services to more customers. With the increasing (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat), political (campaigns demand for more bandwidth with OTT (over-the-top) and outreach) and personal purposes, data requirements applications like video streaming, Hulu, Netflix, and Amazon continue to rise – quicker than service providers can react. Prime becoming more popular, 1GE networks aren’t going to cut it anymore. In support of these activities, service providers are being driven to enhance their network capacities in their business Ethernet, To conquer these challenges, enterprises and service mobile backhaul, E-Rate, cloud networking, and SDN & NFV providers are migrating their 1GE networks to 10GE.
    [Show full text]
  • Žilinská Univerzita V Žiline Elektrotechnická Fakulta Katedra Telekomunikácií
    Žilinská univerzita v Žiline Elektrotechnická fakulta Katedra telekomunikácií Teoretický návrh a realizácia sieťového uzla na báze protokolov 802.1Q, IP a BGP Pavol Križan 2006 Teoretický návrh a realizácia sieťového uzla na báze protokolov 802.1Q, IP a BGP DIPLOMOVÁ PRÁCA PAVOL KRIŽAN ŽILINSKÁ UNIVERZITA V ŽILINE Elektrotechnická fakulta Katedra telekomunikácií Študijný odbor: TELEKOMUNIKÁCIE Vedúci diplomovej práce: Ing. Peter Zuberec Stupeň kvalifikácie: inžinier (Ing.) Dátum odovzdania diplomovej práce: 19.05.2006 ŽILINA 2006 Abstrakt Diplomová práca popisuje základy fungovania počítačových sietí VLAN, protokoly, ktoré sa v nich využívajú a základy smerovacích protokolov, špeciálne Border Gateway Protokol (BGP). Práca sa tiež zaoberá vytvorením modelu sieťového uzla, ktorý bude poskytovať smerovanie s použitím BGP protokolu, podporu VLAN a vysokú redundanciu zariadení alebo liniek. This diploma work is dealing with basic functions of Virtual Local Area Networks, protocols used in those netwoks and basics of routing protocols, specially Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). It describes creation of network node, which will provide routing using BGP protocol, VLAN support and high redundancy of devices or links . Žilinská univerzita v Žiline, Elektrotechnická fakulta, Katedra telekomunikácií ________________________________________________________________________ ANOTAČNÝ ZÁZNAM - DIPLOMOVÁ PRÁCA Priezvisko, meno: Križan Pavol školský rok: 2005/2006 Názov práce: Teoretický návrh a realizácia sieťového uzla na báze protokolov 802.1Q, IP a BGP Počet strán: 50 Počet obrázkov: 23 Počet tabuliek: 0 Počet grafov: 0 Počet príloh: 0 Použitá lit.: 16 Anotácia: Diplomová práca popisuje základy fungovania počítačových sietí VLAN, protokoly, ktoré sa v nich využívajú a základy smerovacích protokolov, špeciálne Border Gateway Protokol (BGP). Práca sa tiež zaoberá vytvorením modelu sieťového uzla, ktorý bude poskytovať smerovanie s použitím BGP protokolu, podporu VLAN a vysokú redundanciu zariadení alebo liniek.
    [Show full text]
  • T-Metro 200 Carrier Ethernet Multi-Service Ces Aggregation
    T-Metro 200 carrier ethernet multi-service ces aggregation The T-Metro 200 is a feature-rich multiservice access device designed to increase service provider revenues and deliver a complete portfolio of voice, data and video services. The T-Metro family of products supports a wide variety of technologies including Ethernet, circuit emulation services (CES), MPLS, OAM (operations, administration and maintenance) tools and hierarchical quality of service (HQoS). This rich combination of technologies PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTS allows service providers to deliver an enhanced service offering while Enhanced Ethernet services, maintaining competitive pricing. features and capabilities The T-Metro 200 provides access to advanced data services such as virtual – 802.1ad provider bridges for Ethernet private LAN services (VPLS), virtual private wire services (VPWS) and IP virtual based L2VPN services private network (IP-VPN) services. In addition, the T-Metro product line enables – Super VLAN for traffic isolation service providers to carry native TDM traffic transparently across packet – Fast-Ring with sub 50ms recovery switched networks (PSN), using various circuit emulation techniques. The TDM traffic is encapsulated in Ethernet or IP frames to emulate the functionality of a – IEEE 802.3ad link aggregation TDM circuit, ensuring that all original feature-sets are preserved. Circuit Emulation Services deliver traditional voice or leased line Designed for Metro Ethernet Services services Convergence of voice, data and video services over a single Ethernet-based – Structured agnostic traffic over infrastructure is transforming the way enterprises and service providers packet (SAToP) conduct their businesses. The T-Metro 200’s versatility, advanced feature-set, – CES over packet switched networks wire speed performance and robust design makes it an ideal convergence (CESoPSN) platform for metro applications, either in a bridged metro Ethernet or MPLS – T1/E1; DS3/T3, OC-3/STM-1 environment.
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE Std 802.3™-2012 New York, NY 10016-5997 (Revision of USA IEEE Std 802.3-2008)
    IEEE Standard for Ethernet IEEE Computer Society Sponsored by the LAN/MAN Standards Committee IEEE 3 Park Avenue IEEE Std 802.3™-2012 New York, NY 10016-5997 (Revision of USA IEEE Std 802.3-2008) 28 December 2012 IEEE Std 802.3™-2012 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.3-2008) IEEE Standard for Ethernet Sponsor LAN/MAN Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society Approved 30 August 2012 IEEE-SA Standard Board Abstract: Ethernet local area network operation is specified for selected speeds of operation from 1 Mb/s to 100 Gb/s using a common media access control (MAC) specification and management information base (MIB). The Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Detection (CSMA/CD) MAC protocol specifies shared medium (half duplex) operation, as well as full duplex operation. Speed specific Media Independent Interfaces (MIIs) allow use of selected Physical Layer devices (PHY) for operation over coaxial, twisted-pair or fiber optic cables. System considerations for multisegment shared access networks describe the use of Repeaters that are defined for operational speeds up to 1000 Mb/s. Local Area Network (LAN) operation is supported at all speeds. Other specified capabilities include various PHY types for access networks, PHYs suitable for metropolitan area network applications, and the provision of power over selected twisted-pair PHY types. Keywords: 10BASE; 100BASE; 1000BASE; 10GBASE; 40GBASE; 100GBASE; 10 Gigabit Ethernet; 40 Gigabit Ethernet; 100 Gigabit Ethernet; attachment unit interface; AUI; Auto Negotiation; Backplane Ethernet; data processing; DTE Power via the MDI; EPON; Ethernet; Ethernet in the First Mile; Ethernet passive optical network; Fast Ethernet; Gigabit Ethernet; GMII; information exchange; IEEE 802.3; local area network; management; medium dependent interface; media independent interface; MDI; MIB; MII; PHY; physical coding sublayer; Physical Layer; physical medium attachment; PMA; Power over Ethernet; repeater; type field; VLAN TAG; XGMII The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Gigabit Ethernet Pocket Guide
    GbE.PocketG.fm Page 1 Friday, March 3, 2006 9:43 AM Carrier Class Ethernet, Metro Ethernet tester, Metro Ethernet testing, Metro Ethernet installation, Metro Ethernet maintenance, Metro Ethernet commissioning, Carrier Class Ethernet tester, Carrier Class Ethernet testing, Carrier Class Ethernet installation, Carrier Class Ethernet maintenance, Gigabit Ethernet tester, Gigabit Ethernet testing, Gigabit Ethernet installation, Gigabit Ethernet maintenance, Gigabit Ethernet commissioning, Gigabit Ethernet protocols, 1000BASE-T tester, 1000BASE-LX test, 1000BASE-SX test, 1000BASE-T testing, 1000BASE-LX testing Trend’s Gigabit EthernetPocket Guide AuroraTango Gigabit Ethernet Multi-technology Personal Test Assistant Platform for simple, fast and effective testing of Gigabit Ethernet, ADSL, OSI model 802.3 model SHDSL, and ISDN. Aurora Tango 7 Application Upper layers Gigabit Ethernet has an exceptional 6 Presentation Reconciliation range of features Upper ensuring reliable delivery of end-to-end 5 Session layers services over Metropolitan networks MII Media independent based on Gigabit Ethernet. 4 It includes a full range of tests and Transport measurements, such as RFC-2544, PCS top ten addresses, real-time Ethernet 3 Network LLC (802.2) statistics, multilayer BERT, etc. Two PMA Gigaport transceivers allow terminate, 2 Data Link MAC (803.3) loopback and monitor connections to Autonegotiation networks, plus a 10/100/1000BASE-T Physical cable port for legacy testing. 1 PHY (802.3) dependent Media MDI A PDA provides an intuitive graphical menu
    [Show full text]
  • 10-Port 2.5GBASE-T Web Smart Switch with 2 X 10G SFP+ Slots
    TEG-30102WS 10-Port 2.5GBASE-T Web Smart Switch with 2 x 10G SFP+ Slots TEG-30102WS (v1.0R) • 8 x 2.5GBASE-T RJ-45 ports with 2 x 10G SFP+ slots • 2.5GBASE-T supports up to 2.5Gbps connection speeds • Compatible with existing Cat5e or better cabling • Easy to use web-based management interface • Supports up to 32 IPv4/IPv6 static routes • Supports LACP, VLAN, and IGMP Snooping • IEEE 802.1p QoS with queue scheduling support • Per port MAC restriction and dynamic ARP inspection • Bandwidth control per port • 80Gbps switching capacity • 1U rack mountable (brackets included) TRENDnet’s 10-Port 2.5GBASE-T Web Smart Switch with eight 2.5GBASE-T ports and two 10G SFP+ slots, model TEG-30102WS, delivers advanced management features with an 80Gbps switching capacity. The TEG-30102WS is equipped with 2.5GBASE-T RJ-45 ports that provide higher gigabit speeds capable of up to 2.5Gbps over existing Cat5e or better cabling. This rack mountable IPv6 ready switch comes with an intuitive web-based interface. Advanced traffic management controls include IP routing, VLAN, QoS, access controls, link aggregation, troubleshooting, and SNMP monitoring, making this a powerful solution for SMB networks. TEG-30102WS Web Smart Management 2.5GBASE-T Ports 10G SFP+ Slots Provides an easy to use web-based GUI Equipped with eight 2.5GBASE-T RJ-45 Offers two 10G SFP+ slots for high-speed management interface for advanced traffic ports that provide higher gigabit speeds network connections providing a cost- management controls, IP routing, VLAN, capable of up to 2.5Gbps over existing effective solution in adding 10G link QoS, access controls, link aggregation, Cat5e or better cabling.
    [Show full text]
  • Carrier Ethernet Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS Release 12.2SR
    Carrier Ethernet Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS Release 12.2SR Americas Headquarters Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134-1706 USA http://www.cisco.com Tel: 408 526-4000 800 553-NETS (6387) Fax: 408 527-0883 THE SPECIFICATIONS AND INFORMATION REGARDING THE PRODUCTS IN THIS MANUAL ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. ALL STATEMENTS, INFORMATION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THIS MANUAL ARE BELIEVED TO BE ACCURATE BUT ARE PRESENTED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. USERS MUST TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR APPLICATION OF ANY PRODUCTS. THE SOFTWARE LICENSE AND LIMITED WARRANTY FOR THE ACCOMPANYING PRODUCT ARE SET FORTH IN THE INFORMATION PACKET THAT SHIPPED WITH THE PRODUCT AND ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO LOCATE THE SOFTWARE LICENSE OR LIMITED WARRANTY, CONTACT YOUR CISCO REPRESENTATIVE FOR A COPY. The Cisco implementation of TCP header compression is an adaptation of a program developed by the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) as part of UCB’s public domain version of the UNIX operating system. All rights reserved. Copyright © 1981, Regents of the University of California. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER WARRANTY HEREIN, ALL DOCUMENT FILES AND SOFTWARE OF THESE SUPPLIERS ARE PROVIDED “AS IS” WITH ALL FAULTS. CISCO AND THE ABOVE-NAMED SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THOSE OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT OR ARISING FROM A COURSE OF DEALING, USAGE, OR TRADE PRACTICE. IN NO EVENT SHALL CISCO OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS OR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO DATA ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THIS MANUAL, EVEN IF CISCO OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
    [Show full text]