THE JEPSON GLOBE a Newsletter from the Friends of the Jepson Herbarium

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE JEPSON GLOBE a Newsletter from the Friends of the Jepson Herbarium THE JEPSON GLOBE A Newsletter from the Friends of The Jepson Herbarium VOLUME 23 NUMBER 1, Spring 2013 Director’s Column: Herbaria Futures Meets its Introducing the California First Challenge! Moss eFlora By Brent D. Mishler By Brent D. Mishler In June 2012, the University and A new online flora of California Jepson Herbaria began an ambitious mosses has been posted at: ucjeps. campaign, Herbaria Futures, to build berkeley.edu/CA_moss_eflora/. It is a an endowment for the Herbaria that will collaborative effort of a broad group of ensure a core foundation of support for professional and amateur bryologists, infrastructure and care of the collec- coordinated by UC Berkeley and Cal tions, continued primary research and State Northridge. The initial editorial its dissemination, and cultivation of the board is Paul Wilson (lead editor) Brent next generation of botanists, ecologists, D. Mishler, Richard L. Moe, Daniel H. and conservationists. Norris, and James R. Shevock. There Phase one of the campaign was is a full set of dichotomous keys, links a huge success with gifts from 330 to photographs and line drawings for Friends in 2012! I am so thankful to many taxa, as well as distribution maps each of you who supported the cam- paign and I also extend my deep grati- drawn from digitized specimens at UC Exciting updates from the Berkeley and California Academy of tude to Rod and Cathy Park for their Sciences. Center for Phycological generous matching gift of $50,000! We It is a work in progress. The initial Documentation are so privileged to have such dedicated and supportive Friends. A new Her- basis for this flora derives from three Breaking news! The University baria Futures endowment fund has print publications — two papers by Herbarium was recently notified that been established with a starting capital Norris and Shevock in Madroño in it will soon be receiving NSF funds balance of $100,000 resulting from 2004, and the book California Mosses to participate in a nationwide project, this first phase of our campaign. The by Malcolm, Malcolm, Shevock, and The Macroalgae Herbarium Consor- Herbaria’s future is brighter because of Norris (Micro-optics Press, 2009) tium: Accessing 150 Years of Speci- your willingness to get involved. — as well as previously unreleased men Data to Understand Changes in full-length treatments of about 400 the Marine/Aquatic Environment. The ALSO IN THIS ISSUE species by D. H. Norris. The eFlora consortium will be a network of 48 includes many updates to this previous U.S. institutions and, collectively, they Welcome Ingrid Jordan-Thaden work and will continue to be updated. will digitize more than one million Jepson Manual Supplements The California Moss eFlora will be a macroalgae specimens. The analysis Heckard Award Recipients worthy companion to the Jepson eFlora of this information will benefit society Pacific Crest Trail Guide for California vascular plants (ucjeps. by having a profound effect on how Paul Silva 90th birthday berkeley.edu/IJM.html) and other aquatic resources are managed. More Jepson Library Renovation eFloras in the planning stages. details on this grant will be presented We regard this as a community in future issues of the Globe. Cover image by Sheraz Sadiq / KQED (Continued on page 10) (Continued on page 8) Welcome Ingrid Jordon-Thaden lication: www.plosone.org/article/ info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal. This past fall, Dr. Ingrid Jordon- A New Molecular Method pone.0050226), where she contributed Thaden became a Research Botanist That is Transforming RNA extraction method development with the University and Jepson Her- Phylogenetic Studies for woody and aquatic plants. Her most baria. She holds a PhD in Biology from recent collaborative publication is the Next Generation Sequencing the University of Heidelberg, Germany, result of a special symposium attended (NGS) is an inclusive term where she studied the phylogeny and by the Soltis Lab held on NGS for plant that describes a multitude of phylogeography of the genus Draba systematics and ecology in October newer methods and platforms (Brassicaceae) under the guidance 2011 in Edinburgh, Scotland. This for DNA sequencing, but does of Prof. Dr. Marcus A. Koch and co- manuscript is part of a special issue not include traditional Sanger advised by Dr. Ihsan Al-Shehbaz from from that symposium and can be found sequencing. These methods the Missouri Botanical Garden. at www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.10 differ from the latter by read- Before arriving at Cal, Ingrid held ing thousands or millions 80/17550874.2012.745909 with a Uni- a two-year post-doctoral research posi- of sequences in parallel; versity of California library subscrip- tion at the Florida Museum for Natural Sanger sequencing reads tion, and is available upon request by History and Department of Biology at one piece of DNA at a time. calling the Herbarium (510) 643-7008. the University of Florida under the su- With NGS, you can get many This last manuscript, published in Plant pervision of Drs. Pam and Doug Soltis. more sequences to work with, Ecology and Diversity (formally known Her work in Florida focused on the and at a lower cost than ac- as the Botanical Journal of Scotland), quiring data one gene at a evolution of polyploidy in Tragopogon is directed to plant biologists who are time. Researchers can obtain (Asteraceae). facing the challenges of deciding on the sequences on a genomic- Ingrid has extensive greenhouse, experimental design for using NGS for scale with NGS, affording the field, and lab experience with plants phylogenetics and marker development. potential for powerful evolu- and considers herself a holistic plant In the summer of 2012, Ingrid’s tionary comparisons using systematist. Her research career began large-scale data sets. Previ- focus turned back to Draba and she be- in her home state, Nebraska, at the Uni- ously, the hurdle with NGS, gan fieldwork onDraba oligosperma in versity of Nebraska-Lincoln, where she at least in many labs, was the the mountains of Wyoming, Montana, obtained a BS in Horticultural Science, preparation of DNA libraries Idaho, and Utah, one of the many inter- a BS in Chemistry (chemotaxonomy), (e.g., pieces of DNA represent- esting Draba systems to study. More and a MS in Biology (proteomics of ing an organismal genome), information about Dr. Jordon-Thaden’s corn mitochondria), studying plants which required significant research may be found at ucjeps.berke- laboratory time and was very under Drs. Robert Kaul, Chuck But- ley.edu/people/ijordonthaden. expensive. However, the cost terfield, and Tom Elthon. of library construction is de- Some of her recent publications deal creasing, as is the cost of the with using new technologies of Next sequencing. NGS is now af- Generation Sequencing (NGS). She is fordable to most laboratories a strong advocate of embracing new (especially with collabora- approaches to molecular phylogenetics tions), and most researchers and population genomics, and tying already have the lab skills to them to phenotypical observations. She carry out the work. Moreover, has been part of a group of researchers newer barcoding methods al- who are developing Tragopogon (Goat’s low for tagging of individual Beard-Asteraceae) as a non-model samples with a molecular identifier, allowing for pooling system to study evolution in plants (see of many samples into a single American Journal of Botany Vol. 99 No. multiplexed sequencing run. 2 for an entire issue dedicated to NGS Multiplexing makes NGS an in plant biology: www.amjbot.org/con- economical option because it tent/99/2.toc; and specifically Buggs et spreads the total costs for se- al. 2012 for the article on Tragopogon: quencing over a larger num- www.amjbot.org/content/99/2/372. ber of individual samples. full). Additionally, Dr. Jordon-Thaden Ultimately, researchers can was involved in the large collaborative get larger amounts of data project to sequence the transcriptome at a fraction of the costs re- Photos, top, Dr. Ingrid Jordon-Thaden, of 1,000 plant species (www.onekp. quired for traditional Sanger bottom (photo by Gary Monroe) Draba org) (see following methodology pub- sequencing approaches. oligosperma. 2 3 The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition: Supplement I By Thomas J. Rosatti, Scientific Editor, Jepson Flora Project As I was unpacking my copy of group with Chamaesyce”, despite the a native that had been overlooked (no The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants fact that Chamaesyce and Euphorbia examples in Supplement I) or, much of California, Second Edition (TJM2; nevertheless are recognized as separate more frequently, unfortunately, yet UC Press, 2012), I was distracted by genera in TJM2. Dodecatheon, another non-native taxon that has the thought that it was already out-of- though itself monophyletic, is part become naturalized (i.e., that has date. To help remedy this, the Jepson of a similar example, in that Primula escaped cultivation and is reproducing Flora Project has adopted a strategy is monophyletic only if it includes in some way) in the area covered (e.g., that includes two important elements: Dodecatheon, yet both genera are Gamochaeta argyrinea, Sphaeropteris 1) updating the Jepson eFlora; and recognized in TJM2. Reconsideration cooperi). In the case of naturalized taxa 2) the printing of supplements, for use has led to new taxonomic treatments of that have become so successful in the with the printed book, that will include Euphorbia (to include Chamaesyce) and area covered that they are problematic, sets of these revisions. Primula (to include Dodecatheon) that there is urgency to get them incorporated The need for such a strategy are more in line with the philosophy of into floristic works so that they may be was evident even as we were in the the Jepson Flora Project, and that will more readily and accurately identified, final stages of preparing the TJM2 appear in Supplement I.
Recommended publications
  • Morrisccp.Pdf
    Acknowledgments Many organizations, agencies and individuals provided invaluable assistance with the preparation of this Comprehensive Conservation Plan. We gratefully ac- knowledge the input and support of Tom Larson, Mike Marxen, John Schomaker, Mary Mitchell, Sean Killen, and Jane Hodgins, Planners with the Division of Ascertainment and Planning and all of the dedicated employees of the Wetland Management Districts of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Region 3 of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is grateful to the many conserva- tion organizations active in western Minnesota for their dedication to the Wet- land Management Districts in making them outstanding examples of cooperation and partnership with the many local communities. The Region is equally grateful to every volunteer who contributes time to the programs offered on the Wetland Management Districts. You are truly the backbone of conservation efforts. i Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................................i Executive Summary ..........................................................................................................................................i Comprehensive Conservation Planning .................................................................................................................. ii The Planning Process ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Progress on Southeast Asia's Flora Projects
    Gardens' Bulletin Singapore 71 (2): 267–319. 2019 267 doi: 10.26492/gbs71(2).2019-02 Progress on Southeast Asia’s Flora projects D.J. Middleton1, K. Armstrong2, Y. Baba3, H. Balslev4, K. Chayamarit5, R.C.K. Chung6, B.J. Conn7, E.S. Fernando8, K. Fujikawa9, R. Kiew6, H.T. Luu10, Mu Mu Aung11, M.F. Newman12, S. Tagane13, N. Tanaka14, D.C. Thomas1, T.B. Tran15, T.M.A. Utteridge16, P.C. van Welzen17, D. Widyatmoko18, T. Yahara14 & K.M. Wong1 1Singapore Botanic Gardens, National Parks Board, 1 Cluny Road, 259569 Singapore [email protected] 2New York Botanical Garden, 2900 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, New York, 10458, USA 3Auckland War Memorial Museum Tāmaki Paenga Hira, Private Bag 92018, Auckland 1142, New Zealand 4Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University Building 1540, Ny Munkegade 114, Aarhus C DK 8000, Denmark 5The Forest Herbarium, National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department, 61 Phahonyothin Rd., Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand 6Herbarium, Forest Research Institute Malaysia, Kepong, Selangor 52109, Malaysia 7School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 8Department of Forest Biological Sciences, College of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of the Philippines - Los Baños, College, 4031 Laguna, Philippines 9Kochi Prefectural Makino Botanical Garden, 4200-6 Godaisan, Kochi, 7818125, Japan 10Southern Institute of Ecology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 01 Mac Dinh Chi Street, District 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 11Forest
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Page
    BIOLOGICAL RECONNAISSANCE SURVEY FOR WOODVILLE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT’S WATER WELL REPLACEMENT PROJECT ( NEAR WOODVILLE, TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA ) Prepared for Woodville Public Utility District P.O. Box 4567 16716 Avenue 168 Woodville, CA 93258 (559) 686-9649 September 2019 Prepared by HALSTEAD & ASSOCIATES Environmental / Biological Consultants 296 Burgan Avenue, Clovis, CA 93611 Office (559) 298-2334; Mobile (559) 970-2875 Fax (559) 322-0769; [email protected] Table of Contents Page 1. Summary ..............................................................................................................................1 2. Background ..........................................................................................................................2 3. Project Location ...................................................................................................................2 4. Project Description...............................................................................................................2 5. Project Site Description .......................................................................................................2 6. Regulatory Overview ...........................................................................................................3 7. Survey Methods ...................................................................................................................7 8. Wildlife Resources in the Project Area ................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Naomi S. Fraga Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden
    The California Deserts: Plant Life at the Extremes Naomi S. Fraga Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Red Pass, Death Valley NP Eastern Kern County, California Western Mojave Desert 29 million acres (45,000 sq mi), or 28% of California's landmass. GIS layer source: Omernick ecoregions level 3 Great Basin Mojave Sonoran A Conspiracy of Extremes Bruce Pavlick- 2008 The California Deserts - Topography: 14,246 to -279 ft. - Geology: Limestone, granite, sand dunes - Temperature: below freezing to 134°F (1913) - Changing history over the past 12,000 years - Transition to modern desert complete by 8,500 to 5,000 years ago Krascheninnikovia lanata (winterfat) “Water, water, water....There is no shortage of water in the desert but exactly the right amount, a perfect ratio of water to rock, water to sand, insuring that wide free open, generous spacing among plants and animals, homes and towns and cities, which makes the arid West so different from any other part of the nation. There is no lack of water here unless you try to establish a city where no city should be.” ― Edward Abbey, Desert Solitaire: A Season in the Wilderness Dutch Cleanser Mine, Red Rock Canyon SP Desert Flora - 2377 taxa native to desert (37% of the CA flora) - 785 taxa that do not occur elsewhere in CA (33%) - 232 naturalized taxa (9%) when compared CA (17%) Sources Desert Jepson Manual (2002) Jepson e-flora (2017) Pavlick (2008) Hesperocallis undulata (desert lily) Topographic diversity= species diversity Great Basin 1363 Taxa Mojave 1409 Taxa Sonoran 709 Taxa Remarkable Flora Dr. Frank Vasek’s students circling King Clone on April 1, 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • NORTH HAIWEE DAM NO. 2 PROJECT Biological Resources Assessment
    APPENDIX E Biological Resources Assessment This page intentionally left blank. NORTH HAIWEE DAM NO. 2 PROJECT Biological Resources Assessment June 2017 Prepared by Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Watershed Resources Group NORTH HAIWEE DAM NO. 2 PROJECT Biological Resources Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................. 2 1.3 PROJECT OVERVIEW................................................................................................. 4 1.3.1 NORTH HAIWEE DAM NUMBER 2 ......................................................................... 4 1.3.2 LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCT REALIGNMENT ............................................................ 7 1.3.3 CACTUS FLATS ROAD REALIGNMENT .................................................................. 7 1.4 BORROW SITES ........................................................................................................ 8 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............................................................................................ 8 2.1 REGIONAL SETTING .................................................................................................. 8 2.2 LOCAL SETTING ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Biodiversity Report
    FINAL Baseline Biodiversity Survey for Potrero Mason Property Prepared for: County of San Diego Department of Parks and Recreation 5500 Overland Avenue Drive, Suite 410 San Diego, California 92123 Contact: Jennifer Price Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 Contact: Brock Ortega DECEMBER 2012 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Final Baseline Biodiversity Survey Potrero Mason Property TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................ V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................VII 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of the Report.............................................................................................. 1 1.2 MSCP Context ........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................9 2.1 Project Location ...................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Geographical Setting ............................................................................................... 9 2.3 Geology and Soils ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae)
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 392 Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae) CATARINA EKENÄS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-7092-0 2008 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8459 !"# $ % !& '((" !()(( * * * + , - . , / , '((", + 0 1# 2, # , 34', 56 , , 70 46"84!855&86(4'8(, - 1# 2 . * 9 10-2 . * . # 9 , * * 1 ! " #! !$ 2 1 2 .8 # * * :# 77 1%&'(2 . !6 '3, + . .8 ) / , ; < * . * ** # , * * * , 09 * . # * * 33 * != , 0- # 9 * * 1, , * 2 . * , 0 * * * * * . * , $ * 0- * % # , # 8 * * * * * * $8> # . * * !' , * * . ** , ? . 0- , +,- # # 7-0 -0 :+' 9 +# $8> ./0) . ) 1 ) 2 * 3) ) .456(7 ) , @ / '((" 700 !=5!8='!& 70 46"84!855&86(4'8( ) ))) 8"&54 1 );; ,/,; A B ) ))) 8"&542 List of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Ekenäs, C., B. G. Baldwin, and K. Andreasen. 2007. A molecular phylogenetic
    [Show full text]
  • Scott State Fishing Lake Plant List
    Stat tt e L o a c k S e P l an st t Checkli Lake Scott State Park, with its large natural springs and protected basin, has long been recognized for the unique characteristics of its flora. Because of the variety of habi- tats present within the park, the diversity of plant species is said to be greater than any other area in the western half of Kansas. This checklist is meant to aid in the enjoyment and appreciation of plants that might be found while visiting Scott State Lake. This checklist does not replace a field guide or other identification reference. There are many good wildflower guides available, with pho- tographs or drawings and plant descriptions. In order to learn to recognize the plants and to learn more about them, it is advisable to purchase a guide for your individual level of interest and experience. Included in this list are native flora and introduced species that have naturalized. Non- native plants are designated by an asterisk (*). This brochure contains a wide diversi- ty of plants. However, this is by no means a complete list of the plants at Scott State Lake. The symbols used are: OCCURRENCE: C = common U = uncommon R = rare OCCURRENCE, particularly of annuals and in relation to the flowering of perennials, can vary greatly from year to year depending on fluctuations in rainfall, temperature, and stress factors that influence growth. HABITAT: M = moist ground or in standing water W = woodland or shady, sheltered areas P = prairie, open with full sun D = disturbed areas, such as roadsides U = bryophyte (mosses and liverworts) and lichen habitats R = found growing on rocks S = grows on soil B = grows on tree bark Some plants are found in more than one habitat, but they are listed by only the habitat in which they are most likely to be found.
    [Show full text]
  • Asters of Yesteryear (Updated April 2018)
    Asters of Yesteryear (Updated April 2018) About this Update: The document was originally posted in a shorter version, to accompany the brief article "Where Have all our Asters Gone?" in the Fall 2017 issue of Sego Lily. In that version it consisted simply of photos of a number of plants that had at some time been included in Aster but that no longer are, as per Flora of North America. In this version I have added names to the photos to indicate how they have changed since their original publication: Date and original name as published (Basionym) IF name used in Intermountain Flora (1994) UF name used in A Utah Flora (1983-2016) FNA name used in Flora of North America (2006) I have also added tables to show the renaming of two groups of species in the Astereae tribe as organized in Intermountain Flora. Color coding shows how splitting of the major genera largely follows fault lines already in place No color Renamed Bright Green Conserved Various Natural groupings $ Plant not in Utah It is noteworthy how few species retain the names used in 1994, but also how the renaming often follows patterns already observed. Asters of Yesteryear (Updated April 2018) Here are larger photos (16 inches wide or tall at normal screen resolution of 72 dpi) of the plants shown in Sego Lily of Fall 2017, arranged by date of original publication. None of them (except Aster amellus on this page) are now regarded as true asters – but they all were at one stage in their history. Now all are in different genera, most of them using names that were published over 100 years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Chamaesaracha Coniodes and C. Coronopus (Solanaceae)
    Averett, J.E. 2010. The status of Chamaesaracha coniodes and C. coronopus (Solanaceae). Phytoneuron 2010-57: 1–5. THE STATUS OF CHAMAESARACHA CONIODES AND C. CORONOPUS (SOLANACEAE) JOHN E. A VERETT Department of Biology P.O. Box 8042 Georgia Southern University Statesboro, GA 30460-8042 [email protected] ABSTRACT An isotype of Chamaesaracha coniodes at the Gray Herbarium has been examined by several workers and bears a number of different annotations, some indicating that the species is synonymous with C. coronopus . All evidence indicates the types of C. coniodes and C. coronopus are referable to distinct species. The present contribution is meant to clarify the distinctions between the two. Averett (2005) described C. darcyi , which had earlier been included with C. coniodes by Averett (1973), and Henrickson (2009) subsequently described two additional species, C. texensis and C. arida , from western populations formerly treated within the boundaries of either C. coniodes or C. coronopus by Averett (1973) and Rydberg (1896). Chamaesaracha texensis and C. arida are maintained here within C. coniodes and C. coronopus , respectively; discussions of all these taxa are provided. KEY WORDS: Chamaesaracha arida, Chamaesaracha coronopus , Chamaesaracha coniodes , Chamaesaracha darcyi, Chamaesaracha texensis , Solanaceae Examining specimens during the summer of 2008 at the Gray Herbarium, I noted that an isotype of Chamaesaracha coniodes (basionym: Solanum coniodes ) had been annotated as Chamaesaracha coniodes by James Henrickson. On that label he also wrote “= Chamaesaracha coronopus as used by Averett.” The annotation is not dated but, judging from its position to other annotations on the sheet, it was made prior to 1997. There are actually three specimens on the GH sheet (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California
    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
    [Show full text]