Conducting Virtual Bench Trials
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Supreme Court and the New Equity
Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 68 | Issue 4 Article 1 5-2015 The uprS eme Court and the New Equity Samuel L. Bray Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Supreme Court of the United States Commons Recommended Citation Samuel L. Bray, The uS preme Court and the New Equity, 68 Vanderbilt Law Review 997 (2019) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol68/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 68 MAY 2015 NUMBER 4 ARTICLES The Supreme Court and the New Equity Samuel L. Bray* The line between law and equity has largely faded away. Even in remedies, where the line persists, the conventional scholarly wisdom favors erasing it. Yet something surprisinghas happened. In a series of cases over the last decade and a half, the U.S. Supreme Court has acted directly contrary to this conventional wisdom. These cases range across many areas of substantive law-from commercial contracts and employee benefits to habeas and immigration, from patents and copyright to environmental law and national security. Throughout these disparate areas, the Court has consistently reinforced the line between legal and equitable remedies, and it has treated equitable remedies as having distinctive powers and limitations. This Article describes and begins to evaluate the Court's new equity cases. -
Participating School List 2018-2019
School Name School City School State Abington Senior High School Abington PA Academy of Information Technology & Eng. Stamford CT Academy of Notre Dame de Namur Villanova PA Academy of the Holy Angels Demarest NJ Acton-Boxborough Regional High School Acton MA Advanced Math and Science Academy Marlborough MA Agawam High School Agawam MA Allendale Columbia School Rochester NY Alpharetta High School Alpharetta GA American International School A-1090 Vienna American Overseas School of Rome Rome Italy Amesbury High School Amesbury MA Amity Regional High School Woodbridge CT Antilles School St. Thomas VI Arcadia High School Arcadia CA Arcata High School Arcata CA Arlington Catholic High School Arlington MA Austin Preparatory School Reading MA Avon Old Farms Avon CT Baldwin Senior High School Baldwin NY Barnstable High School Hyannis MA Barnstable High School Hyannis MA Barrington High School Barrington RI Barron Collier High School Naples FL BASIS Scottsdale Scottsdale AZ Baxter Academy of Technology & Science Portland ME Bay Village High School Bay Village OH Bedford High School Bedford NH Bedford High School Bedford MA Belen Jesuit Preparatory School Miami FL Berkeley High School Berkeley CA Berkshire School Sheffield MA Bethel Park Senior High Bethel Park PA Bishop Brady High School Concord NH Bishop Feehan High School Attleboro MA Bishop Fenwick High School Peabody MA Bishop Guertin High School Nashua NH Bishop Hendricken High School Warwick RI Bishop Seabury Academy Lawrence KS Bishop Stang High School North Dartmouth MA Blind Brook High -
The Official Boarding Prep School Directory Schools a to Z
2020-2021 DIRECTORY THE OFFICIAL BOARDING PREP SCHOOL DIRECTORY SCHOOLS A TO Z Albert College ON .................................................23 Fay School MA ......................................................... 12 Appleby College ON ..............................................23 Forest Ridge School WA ......................................... 21 Archbishop Riordan High School CA ..................... 4 Fork Union Military Academy VA ..........................20 Ashbury College ON ..............................................23 Fountain Valley School of Colorado CO ................ 6 Asheville School NC ................................................ 16 Foxcroft School VA ..................................................20 Asia Pacific International School HI ......................... 9 Garrison Forest School MD ................................... 10 The Athenian School CA .......................................... 4 George School PA ................................................... 17 Avon Old Farms School CT ...................................... 6 Georgetown Preparatory School MD ................... 10 Balmoral Hall School MB .......................................22 The Governor’s Academy MA ................................ 12 Bard Academy at Simon's Rock MA ...................... 11 Groton School MA ................................................... 12 Baylor School TN ..................................................... 18 The Gunnery CT ........................................................ 7 Bement School MA................................................. -
Admiralty and Maritime Litigation in State Court David W
Louisiana Law Review Volume 55 | Number 4 Maritime Law Symposium March 1995 Admiralty and Maritime Litigation in State Court David W. Robertson Repository Citation David W. Robertson, Admiralty and Maritime Litigation in State Court, 55 La. L. Rev. (1995) Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol55/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Louisiana Law Review by an authorized editor of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Admiralty and Maritime Litigation in State Court David W. Robertson' TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................... 686 II. General Principles of Jurisdiction ..................... 687 A. The Criteria for Identifying an Admiralty or Maritime C ase . ...................................... 689 1. Admiralty Tort Jurisdiction .................... 690 2. Admiralty Jurisdiction in Contract Cases .......... 694 B. When Is Federal Court Admiralty Jurisdiction Exclusive? . 698 C. What Are the General Limits of State Authority in Concurrent Jurisdiction Cases? . 699 III. When Are State Courts Bound to Follow the Federal Courts: Current General Views of Reverse-Erie Preemption ........ 700 IV. Selected Difficulties from the Procedural Realm .......... 705 A. Forum Non Conveniens ......................... 705 B. Forum Selection Clauses ........................ 709 C. The Plaintiffs Right to Elect Bench or Jury Trial ...... 710 D. Prejudgment Interest ........................... 713 1. The Federal Court Picture in a Nutshell ........... 714 a. Bench Trials ........................... 714 b. Jury Trials in Maritime Cases Not Involving the Jones Act ............................. 715 c. Jury Trials in Jones Act Cases ............... 715 d. Summ ary .............................. 716 2. The State Courts' View that They Must Follow the Federal Courts ........................... -
Help Yourself
Help Yourself Trials In Landlord and Tenant Court This information sheet describes what happens at trials. A tenant or landlord who would like more help can visit the Landlord Tenant Resource Center or talk to another lawyer. There is information at the end of this sheet on where to find legal help. n What happens at a trial? If the tenant has defenses to the A jury trial may not be scheduled for three or four months landlord’s claims, the tenant can ask for a trial. At the trial, both or more after your first court date. Before your trial date, you the landlord and tenant can present evidence. This evidence will have to come back for several court dates. You will have may include documents, photographs, or testimony from wit- a scheduling conference, mediation, and pretrial conference. nesses. Either a judge or jury will hear the evidence and make You also may have to file documents with the court or with the a decision about whether the landlord or the tenant wins the other party. If you miss a court date or fail to file a document, case. At a trial, the landlord has the burden of proving his or her you may lose your case. If you do not have an attorney, it may claim against the tenant. If the tenant has filed a counterclaim, be hard for you to do everything you have to do for a jury trial. recoupment, or setoff, the tenant has the burden of proving Some people without attorneys choose a bench trial instead of a those claims. -
Recent Senior Administrative Searches
RECENT SENIOR ADMINISTRATIVE SEARCHES This sampling of recent senior administrative searches illustrates the broad range of schools we serve and the strength of their appointees. ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL NEW YORK, NY (2018-19) Since its founding in 1878, Ethical Culture Fieldston School has been a beacon of progressive education in America. Known among New York City independent schools as a place where children are simultaneously encouraged to revel in the joys of childhood and confront the challenges presented by the modern world, ECFS emphasizes ethical thinking, academic excellence, and student-centered learning. PRINCIPAL, FIELDSTON UPPER - Nigel Furlonge was Associate Head of School at Holderness School from 2015-2018 before his appointment at ECFS. Previous posts include Admissions Director and Dean of Students and Residential Life at Christina Seix Academy, Academic Dean at The Lawrenceville School, and Director of Studies at St. Andrew’s School (DE). Nigel is a graduate of Boston Latin School and holds a B.A. in American History with a minor in African American Studies from The University of Pennsylvania, an M.A. in American History from Villanova University, and an M.Ed. in Organization and Private School Leadership from Columbia University. PRINCIPAL, FIELDSTON LOWER - Joseph McCauley previously served as Assistant Head of Pre- and Lower School at The Packer Collegiate Institute before joining Fieldston. He joined Packer in 2008 as a fourth-grade teacher. During his time there, he was Director of the Teacher Mentor Program, Leader of Yearlong Staff Development Groups, and a member of the Lower School Curriculum Leadership Team, as well as the Strategic Plan Task Force on Community and Identity. -
Graduates of the Mesa
COLLEGE DESTINATIONS 2011–2015 American University Babson College University of Puget Sound Bard College Barnard College Bennington College Bentley University Boston College Boston University Bowdoin College Brown University Bucknell University California Maritime Academy Bowdoin College California Polytechnic State University University of California, Berkeley University of California, Davis University of California, Los Angeles Dartmouth College University of California, San Diego University of California, Santa Barbara University of California, Santa Cruz Carnegie Mellon University Case Western Reserve University Macalester College Skidmore College Chapman University Tufts University Boston College College of Charleston University of Chicago Williams College Harvard University Claremont McKenna College Wellesley College Colby College Cornell University Colgate University University of Colorado at Boulder Brown University Colorado College Columbia University Connecticut College CATE Wesleyan University Yale University Cornell University University of Michigan The Culinary Institute of America Barnard College The Culinary Institute of America Dartmouth College Davidson College Columbia University University of Denver Dickinson College New York University Duke University University of Chicago Haverford College University of Edinburgh Elon University Emmanuel College Juniata College University of Pennsylvania Emory University Endicott College Dickinson College Franklin and Marshall College Johns Hopkins University The George Washington -
Is Innocent a Possible Verdict in a Criminal Trial
Is Innocent A Possible Verdict In A Criminal Trial diddleCarotenoidCreepiest imprecisely Hank Chase kowtow whileIslamises indefiniteher eiderdownperceptually Richy so worths or theoretically outspan that thirsts. tempestuously that Dorian equiponderates when Ibrahim isvery blistered. downstream. Aldo still Costs of doing charity with not proven currently outweigh possible benefits. The shade then enters a judgment based on the verdict and avoid jury is released from playing If seen not guilty the defendant in certain criminal lawsuit is released. Clear My evidence What and on his Criminal Record LegalMatch. Did not openly available from retrieving information is innocent a verdict criminal trial in court practice, if the new jersey are not an electronic register. Means that if there ever two reasons given has the ultimate and iron are possible explanations. A The verdict in every person action ever be general. Both a verdict criminal trial is in some cases? That I thought some have resulted in cotton not guilty verdict had the Defendant gone to trial. Does not not guilty go on item record? Or her liable in american criminal than the results from the act trial but likely be applied. In practice criminal trial its burden if proof required of the prosecutor is to prove criminal guilt. If the defendant is found guilty the judge in may case will decide on sentence. Criminal Justice System The Trial in County WA. Anyone accused of fiction crime is presumed under the law but be innocent however they plead. Once a better trial has begun but turn it goes quickly the clean it's penalty for a defendant to obtain may not-guilty verdict from his judge. -
Instructions for Parties Including Guidelines Regarding Protected, Confidential, Or Sensitive Information
Instructions for Parties including guidelines regarding protected, confidential, or sensitive information Office of Administrative Law Judges U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street NE, Mail Stop 2585 Washington, DC 20549 Phone: (202) 551-6030 Fax: (202) 777-1031 Email: [email protected] This information is primarily for parties1 appearing in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or the Commission) administrative proceedings before an administrative law judge. If you have questions regarding the record of a case, documents posted on the SEC’s website, or electronic filing through the SEC’s Electronic Filings in Administrative Proceedings (eFAP) system, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. For eFAP system access or technical issues, contact (202) 551-EFAP (3327). Part I: General Instructions Administrative proceedings are governed by the SEC’s rules of practice found at 17 C.F.R. § 201.100 et seq. The rules are available online here. All parties, including pro se respondents,2 are expected to be familiar with and abide by these rules. Parties must also familiarize themselves with the Office of the Secretary’s eFAP instructions and user manual governing electronic filing. Legal Representation Respondents may retain their own legal counsel to represent them3 and are encouraged to do so. The SEC cannot, however, appoint or pay for a 1 As used in this document, the term party or parties usually means Respondents and the Division of Enforcement. Non-party case participants should follow these instructions to the extent applicable. 2 A respondent is the person or entity charged in an administrative proceeding instituted by the Commission. -
Danish Law, Part II
University of Miami Law Review Volume 5 Number 2 Article 3 2-1-1951 Danish Law, Part II Lester B. Orfield Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Recommended Citation Lester B. Orfield, Danish Law, Part II, 5 U. Miami L. Rev. 197 (1951) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol5/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DANISH LAW DANISH LAW LESTER B. ORFIELD PART II* LOCAL GOVERNMENT In 1841 local government was reformed by introducing parish councils to which the peasants elected some representatives. 233 In turn the parish councils elected members of the county councils. The pastors were no longer to be chairmen of the parish councils, but continued to be members ex officio. The right to vote was extended to owners of but 1.4 acres. The councils were created to deal with school matters and poor relief; but road maintenance, public health, business and industrial licenses, and liquor licenses were also within their province. The right to vote in local elections was long narrowly restricted. Under legislation of 1837 the six largest cities other than Copenhagen chose coun- cilmen on a property basis permitting only seven per cent of the population to vote. Early in the nineteenth century rural communities began to vote for poor law and school officials. -
Employment & Labour
Employment & Labour Law 2019 Seventh Edition Contributing Editor: Charles Wynn-Evans Global Legal Insights Employment & Labour Law 2019, Seventh Edition Contributing Editor: Charles Wynn-Evans Published by Global Legal Group GLOBAL LEGAL INSIGHTS – EMPLOYMENT & LABOUR LAW 2019, SEVENTH EDITION Contributing Editor Charles Wynn-Evans, Dechert LLP Editor Sam Friend Senior Editors Caroline Collingwood & Rachel Williams Group Consulting Editor Alan Falach Publisher Rory Smith We are extremely grateful for all contributions to this edition. Special thanks are reserved for Charles Wynn-Evans for all of his assistance. Published by Global Legal Group Ltd. 59 Tanner Street, London SE1 3PL, United Kingdom Tel: +44 207 367 0720 / URL: www.glgroup.co.uk Copyright © 2018 Global Legal Group Ltd. All rights reserved No photocopying ISBN 978-1-912509-49-2 ISSN 2050-2117 This publication is for general information purposes only. It does not purport to provide comprehensive full legal or other advice. Global Legal Group Ltd. and the contributors accept no responsibility for losses that may arise from reliance upon information contained in this publication. This publication is intended to give an indication of legal issues upon which you may need advice. Full legal advice should be taken from a qualified professional when dealing with specific situations. The information contained herein is accurate as of the date of publication. Printed and bound by TJ International, Trecerus Industrial Estate, Padstow, Cornwall, PL28 8RW December 2018 CONTENTS Preface -
The Bench Trial: It Really Is Different by HON
Back to Table of Contents ADVOCATE SUMMER 2009 92 THE ✯ FROM MY SIDE OF T HE BENCH The Bench Trial: It Really Is Different BY HON. RANDY WILSON E’RE IN THE MIDDLE OF A BENCH TRIAL and I’m ask a witness to read a paragraph out loud. The document Wreminded of the many ways that a trial to the judge is already in evidence; there’s absolutely no reason to have differs from a jury trial. Trial lawyers often approach the witness demonstrate his reading prowess. Simply turn them the same, but there are fundamental differences. Now to the judge and say, “Your Honor, I’m now going to focus my that I’ve presided over scores of bench trials, I offer these questions on paragraph 4 of Ex. 1. Would you like a minute observations. to look at it before I begin my questions?” And, whatever you do, avoid the hackneyed trick of reading a paragraph from First, keep in mind that the judge is deciding both the a document and merely asking the witness, “did I read that facts and the law. As a result, you should approach the correctly?” That ruse might be a way to drive home a point in trial differently from the onset. The opening statement to a a document to a jury, but it has little place with the judge. jury will focus on the facts. In a bench trial, however, the opening statement should weave the facts and law together. Sixth, think of closing arguments the same as a jury trial.