DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategies to Control Mercury Pollution in the Cache Creek Basin, Northern California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategies to Control Mercury Pollution in the Cache Creek Basin, Northern California STRATEGIES TO CONTROL MERCURY POLLUTION IN THE CACHE CREEK BASIN, NORTHERN CALIFORNIA 2011 Group Project Prepared by: Melissa Riley, Amibeth Sheridan, Bethany Taylor, Kristiana Teige, Toshiyuki Yamasaki, and Nick Zigler Faculty Advisor: Arturo A. Keller, Ph.D. Client: U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management – California State Office Strategies to Control Mercury Pollution in the Cache Creek Basin, Northern California As authors of this Group Project report, we are proud to archive this report on the Bren School’s website such that the results of our research are available for all to read. Our signatures on the document signify our joint responsibility to fulfill the archiving standards set by the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management. _________________________________ _________________________________ Melissa Riley Amibeth Sheridan _________________________________ _________________________________ Bethany Taylor Kristiana Teige _________________________________ _________________________________ Toshiyuki Yamasaki Nick Zigler The mission of the Bren School of Environmental Science & Management is to produce professionals with unrivaled training in environmental science and management who will devote their unique skills to the diagnosis, assessment, mitigation, prevention, and remedy of the environmental problems of today and the future. A guiding principle of the School is that the analysis of environmental problems requires quantitative training in more than one discipline and an awareness of the physical, biological, social, political, and economic consequences that arise from scientific or technological decisions. The Group Project is required of all students in the Master’s of Environmental Science and Management (MESM) Program. It is a three-quarter activity in which small groups of students conduct focused, interdisciplinary research on the scientific, management, and policy dimensions of a specific environmental issue. This Final Group Project Report is authored by MESM students and has been reviewed and approved by: _________________________________ Arturo A. Keller March 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................ i LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................... ix ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................... xi PROJECT OBJECTIVES....................................................................................... xvi PROJECT SIGNIFICANCE ................................................................................. xvii BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 1 Cache Creek ............................................................................................................. 1 Mercury Chemistry ................................................................................................. 9 Ecological Effects of Mercury Contamination ................................................... 12 Mercury Sources ................................................................................................... 15 Harley Gulch ........................................................................................................ 21 Bear Creek and Sulphur Creek ............................................................................ 23 Davis Creek ......................................................................................................... 26 Clear Lake ............................................................................................................ 27 Summary .............................................................................................................. 27 Regulatory Framework......................................................................................... 28 BLM Management, Water Board, and Basin Plan Background .......................... 28 Applicable Regulations, Policies, and Laws ....................................................... 33 Remediation/ Restoration Technologies & Management Options ................... 42 Containment Technologies .................................................................................. 45 Erosion Controls and Stream Bank Stabilization ................................................ 47 Removal ............................................................................................................... 49 Phytoremediation ................................................................................................. 51 Physical and Chemical Treatment (Soil) ............................................................. 54 Chemical Treatment (Water) ............................................................................... 56 Emerging Technologies ....................................................................................... 58 Additional Management Options......................................................................... 63 Summary of Remediation Technologies ............................................................. 64 Current Remediation in the Cache Creek Basin ................................................ 67 Sulphur Bank Mercury Mine ............................................................................... 67 Abbott and Turkey Run Mines ............................................................................ 67 Knoxville Mining District ................................................................................... 68 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 69 i Decision Trees & Matrices ................................................................................... 69 Assessment Criteria............................................................................................... 70 Ranking System & Case Studies .......................................................................... 71 Harley Gulch Wetlands ....................................................................................... 73 Harley Gulch Delta .............................................................................................. 87 Sulphur Creek Stream Banks, Cherry Hill to Manzanita .................................... 93 West End Mine Waste Rock Pile ...................................................................... 101 Clyde Mine ........................................................................................................ 106 Turkey Run Spring ............................................................................................ 111 Summary of Case Studies .................................................................................. 116 Watershed Modeling ........................................................................................... 118 Watershed Model Setup and Calibration Process .............................................. 119 Erosivity............................................................................................................. 121 Soil Mercury Concentrations ............................................................................. 123 Watershed Modeling Results.............................................................................. 126 Water Budget ..................................................................................................... 126 Sediment Budget................................................................................................ 129 Mercury Budget ................................................................................................. 132 Prior Mercury Load Calculations from the Cache Creek Basin ........................ 137 Methylmercury Budget ...................................................................................... 142 Evaluation of Remediation Actions in the Cache Creek Basin ......................... 145 Evaluation of Remediation Actions in the Harley Gulch Watershed ................ 147 Evaluation of Remediation Actions in the Sulphur Creek Watershed .............. 150 Evaluation of Remediation Actions in the Bear Creek Watershed ................... 151 Discussion of Cache Creek Canyon ................................................................... 152 Summary of Watershed Model .......................................................................... 156 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 157 Actions to take ..................................................................................................... 158 Additional Data Collection and Monitoring Plan ............................................ 160 Further Research................................................................................................. 164 Partnerships ......................................................................................................... 166 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Horseback Riding, Bird Watching, Primitive Camping, Commercial And
    United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Ukiah Field Office 2550 N. State Street Ukiah, CA 95482 www.ca.blm.gov/ukiah Dear Reader, Enclosed is the Final Cache Creek Coordinated Resource Management Plan (CRMP). This plan provides the framework for the future management direction of BLM lands included within the Cache Creek Natural Area. Additional cooperators with this plan include the California Department of Fish and Game, which manages the Cache Creek Wildlife Area, and Yolo County Parks and Resources Management which manages Cache Creek Canyon Regional Park. The Draft CRMP was released in September 2002, and considered several alternatives with varying degrees of habitat development/resource protection and primitive recreation development. Based on public input to this draft at public meetings and from written responses, emails, faxes, and phone messages a Proposed Action was developed that best prioritized the protection of resource values while allowing a compatible level of primitive recreational use. Each of the projects proposed in this CRMP will be evaluated in an Environmental Assessment that will present several alternatives and discuss the environmental impacts of each alternative. I thank everyone who commented on the Draft and provided helpful suggestions in developing this CRMP. Sincerely. Rich Burns Ukiah Field Office Manager U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Cache Creek Coordinated Resource Management Plan/ Environmental Assessment Final Prepared by: Ukiah Field Office
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Highlights This Year’S New Projects
    Keeping Wilderness Wild Private inholdings are a threat to the globally unique, 109 million acre preservation system that millions of people have spent 50 years creating. Nearly 180,000 acres of private lands in 2,883 parcels remain within Congressionally designated Wilderness Areas in the lower 48 states. Each landowner has the right to develop their property as they see fit. How do we determine which properties to acquire? The Trust developed what is now a nationally recognized method for prioritizing the acquisition of wilderness inholdings with Colorado State University in the early 1990’s. Go to most Forest Service and BLM offices and ask for information on their wilderness inholdings—you’ll likely get one of our statewide reports. The prioritization method measures three major components for determining the highest priority properties to acquire: 1. Its development potential; 2. The property’s ecological importance to the surrounding wilderness; and 3. The recreational and management impact of the property on the surrounding wilderness. We look at and score 17 unique factors. Lands with road access that fragment threatened and endangered species habitat crossed by a trail go right to the top. We then tenaciously contact landowners, partnering with federal agencies and local wilderness advocacy groups to identify good projects from willing sellers. How is the Trust funded? We implement our land acquisition program through the development of two funds. Each is supported by donors and private foundations who believe that securing our National Wilderness Preservation System is of the utmost importance—and know that the Trust proves its ability to add land to wilderness each and every year.
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred Ninth Congress of the United States of America
    H. R. 233 One Hundred Ninth Congress of the United States of America AT THE SECOND SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the third day of January, two thousand and six An Act To designate certain National Forest System lands in the Mendocino and Six Rivers National Forests and certain Bureau of Land Management lands in Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, and Napa Counties in the State of California as wilderness, to designate the Elkhorn Ridge Potential Wilderness Area, to designate certain segments of the Black Butte River in Mendocino County, California as a wild or scenic river, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Northern California Coastal Wild Heritage Wilderness Act’’. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title and table of contents. Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary. Sec. 3. Designation of wilderness areas. Sec. 4. Administration of wilderness areas. Sec. 5. Release of wilderness study areas. Sec. 6. Elkhorn Ridge Potential Wilderness Area. Sec. 7. Wild and scenic river designation. Sec. 8. King Range National Conservation Area boundary adjustment. Sec. 9. Cow Mountain Recreation Area, Lake and Mendocino Counties, California. Sec. 10. Continuation of traditional commercial surf fishing, Redwood National and State Parks. SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY. In this Act, the term ‘‘Secretary’’ means— (1) with respect to land under the jurisdiction of the Sec- retary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Agriculture; and (2) with respect to land under the jurisdiction of the Sec- retary of the Interior, the Secretary of the Interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Small Vessel General Permit
    ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC NOTICE The United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois has requested a determination from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources if their Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) are consistent with the enforceable policies of the Illinois Coastal Management Program (ICMP). VGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non-recreational vessels greater than or equal to 79 ft. in length. sVGP regulates discharges incidental to the normal operation of commercial vessels and non- recreational vessels less than 79 ft. in length. VGP and sVGP can be viewed in their entirety at the ICMP web site http://www.dnr.illinois.gov/cmp/Pages/CMPFederalConsistencyRegister.aspx Inquiries concerning this request may be directed to Jim Casey of the Department’s Chicago Office at (312) 793-5947 or [email protected]. You are invited to send written comments regarding this consistency request to the Michael A. Bilandic Building, 160 N. LaSalle Street, Suite S-703, Chicago, Illinois 60601. All comments claiming the proposed actions would not meet federal consistency must cite the state law or laws and how they would be violated. All comments must be received by July 19, 2012. Proposed Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) SMALL VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS LESS THAN 79 FEET (sVGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Collections
    A. andersonii A. Gray SANTA CRUZ MANZANITA San Mateo Along Skyline Blvd. between Gulch Road and la Honda Rd. (A. regismontana?) Santa Cruz Along Empire Grade, about 2 miles north of its intersection with Alba Grade. Lat. N. 37° 07', Long. 122° 10' W. Altitude about 2550 feet. Santa Cruz Aong grade (summit) 0.8 mi nw Alba Road junction (2600 ft elev. above and nw of Ben Lomond (town)) - Empire Grade Santa Cruz Near Summit of Opal Creek Rd., Big Basin Redwood State Park. Santa Cruz Near intersection of Empire Grade and Alba Grade. ben Lomond Mountain. Santa Cruz Along China Grade, 0.2 miles NW of its intersection with the Big Basin-Saratoga Summit Rd. Santa Cruz Nisene Marks State Park, Aptos Creek watershed; under PG&E high-voltage transmission line on eastern rim of the creek canyon Santa Cruz Along Redwood Drive 1.5 miles up (north of) from Monte Toyon Santa Cruz Miller's Ranch, summit between Gilroy and Watsonville. Santa Cruz At junction of Alba Road and Empire Road Ben Lomond Ridge summit Santa Cruz Sandy ridges near Bonny Doon - Santa Cruz Mountains Santa Cruz 3 miles NW of Santa Cruz, on upper UC Santa Cruz campus, Marshall Fields Santa Cruz Mt. Madonna Road along summit of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Between Lands End and Manzanitas School. Lat. N. 37° 02', Long. 121° 45' W; elev. 2000 feet Monterey Moro Road, Prunedale (A. pajaroensis?) A. auriculata Eastw. MT. DIABLO MANZANITA Contra Costa Between two major cuts of Cowell Cement Company (w face of ridge) - Mount Diablo, Lime Ridge Contra Costa Immediately south of Nortonville; 37°57'N, 121°53'W Contra Costa Top Pine Canyon Ridge (s-facing slope between the two forks) - Mount Diablo, Emmons Canyon (off Stone Valley) Contra Costa Near fire trail which runs s from large spur (on meridian) heading into Sycamore Canyon - Mount Diablo, Inner Black Hills Contra Costa Off Summit Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Bill Signed from the Sept/Oct 1984 Designates 677,600 Acres Areas Are in Southern Cali- Ers Were Released
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE CALIFORNIA WILDERNESS COALITION Vol. XL Berkeley, Ca. October 22, 2016 No. 1 Wild lands saved COALITION FORMS From the Mar/Apr 1976 The California Wilder- activities; protection on to save any or all of these Wilderness Record, ness Coalition has as its which is given units of unprotected wild lands. Vol. 1, No. 1 single goal the preserva- the National or California tion of all remaining wil- (state) Wilderness Preser- The Coalition will pull California Wilderness has derness lands in Califor- vation Systems. together not only individ- just gained a new friend. nia. It estimates that nearly uals and environmental The California Wilderness 14 million acres of wild The remaining 12 mil- groups, but any scientific, Coalition has been formed land still exist (14 percent lion acres – lands which educational, or civic orga- by a group of wilderness of the state’s total area) are just as valuable and nization that is interested conservationists con- under the jurisdiction of also widely used for recre- in wilderness or a particu- cerned with the need for a federal and state agencies. ation, inspiration, scientif- lar wilderness area. In ad- stepped-up level of activi- However, only 1.9 million ic study, wildlife habitat, dition, the Coalition will ty on behalf of wilderness acres of this wild land has and other wilderness uses include those who have an in the state. Before now, legal protection against – are open to and threat- economic interest in unde- no statewide group has road-building, motorized ened by development. veloped land: manufactur- focused solely on wilder- vehicles, logging and oth- Wilderness lovers will ers and retailers of back- ness preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument
    California Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument Annual Manager’s Report—Fiscal Year 2017 Table of Contents Berryessa Snow Mountain Profile .................................................................................................... 1 Planning and NEPA ............................................................................................................................. 4 Year’s Projects and Accomplishments ............................................................................................ 6 Science .............................................................................................................................................. 14 Resources, Objects, Values, and Stressors .................................................................................. 16 Summary of Performance Measure ............................................................................................. 18 Manager’s Letter .............................................................................................................................. 18 Beautiful vistas are abundant within the Cache Creek, Snow Mountain, and Cedar Roughs Wilderness Areas of Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument. Berryessa Snow Mountain Profile 1 Designating Authority Designating Authority: Presidential Proclamation – Establishment of the Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument (BSM) Date of Designation: July 10, 2015 Other legislation and documents guiding management include Northern California Coastal Wild Heritage Wilderness Act (Public
    [Show full text]
  • MICROCOMP Output File
    109TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION S. 128 AN ACT To designate certain public land in Humboldt, Del Norte, Mendocino, Lake, and Napa Counties in the State of California as wilderness, to designate certain segments of the Black Butte River in Mendocino County, Cali- fornia as a wild or scenic river, and for other purposes. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Northern California 5 Coastal Wild Heritage Wilderness Act’’. 2 1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY. 2 In this Act, the term ‘‘Secretary’’ means— 3 (1) with respect to land under the jurisdiction 4 of the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Ag- 5 riculture; and 6 (2) with respect to land under the jurisdiction 7 of the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of the 8 Interior. 9 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS AREAS. 10 In accordance with the Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 11 1131 et seq.), the following areas in the State of California 12 are designated as wilderness areas and as components of 13 the National Wilderness Preservation System: 14 (1) SNOW MOUNTAIN WILDERNESS ADDITION.— 15 (A) IN GENERAL.—Certain land in the 16 Mendocino National Forest, comprising ap- 17 proximately 23,312 acres, as generally depicted 18 on the maps described in subparagraph (B), is 19 incorporated in and shall considered to be a 20 part of the ‘‘Snow Mountain Wilderness’’, as 21 designated by section 101(a)(31) of the Cali- 22 fornia Wilderness Act of 1984 (16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument
    Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument California Annual Manager’s Report—Fiscal Year 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Forest Service Bureau of Land Management Mendocino National Forest Table of Contents Berryessa Snow Mountain Fact Sheet 2 Unit Map 5 Berryessa Snow Mountain Overview 6 Programs and Accomplishments 22 Science 10 Resources, Objects, Values, and Stressors 26 Summary of Performance Measure 33 Manager’s Letter 34 Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument Designating Authority Designating Authority: Presidential Proclamation #9298, Antiquities Act (34 Stat. 225, 16 U.S.C. 431) Date of Designation: July 10, 2015 Managing Partners The Bureau of Land Management and United States Forest Service each manage the portion of the lands within the monument. Additional Designations Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument (BSMNM) includes three designated wilderness areas: Snow Mountain, Cache Creek, and Cedar Roughs. Cache Creek is designated as a Wild and Scenic River under the California Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The monument also includes five Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACECs). Site Description The Berryessa region exhibits some of the most scenic and biologically diverse landscapes in California. BSMNM encompasses 330,780 acres that are rich with cultural significance and provide important habitat for plants and wildlife. They range from rolling, oak-studded hillsides to steep creek canyons, forests, and stunning ridgelines with expansive views. To the north, Snow Mountain Wilderness provides a unique outdoor experience with forested trails and lush waterfalls. Further south, the Cache Creek Wilderness and Berryessa Peak provide exceptional opportunities for researchers and recreationists. Native American cultural legacies are an important component of this landscape.
    [Show full text]