DNA-Based Identification of Herbertus Species on Gough Island, South

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DNA-Based Identification of Herbertus Species on Gough Island, South Cryptogamie,Bryologie,2010,31(1):67-74 ©2010Adac.Tous droits réservés DNA-based identification of Herbertus species on Gough Island,SouthAtlanticOcean Jochen HEINRICHSa*,Kathrin FELDBERGa ,Hans-PeterKREIERa ,Ji ÷ íVÁ~ A b a GeorgAugust University,Departmentof SystematicBotany,Albrechtvon Haller InstituteofPlantSciences,UntereKarspüle 2,37073 Göttingen,Germany. b CharlesUniversity,Departmentof Botany,Benátská2,12801Praha2, CzechRepublic. (Received 6November2009,accepted 3December2009) Abstract –Based on phylogeneticanalysesof nrITS sequencesand accompanying morphologicalinvestigations,severalaccessionsof Herbertus from the SouthAtlantic Gough Island wereidentified as Herbertus runcinatus or Herbertus sendtneri .The Gough Island accession of H.sendtneri incorporated in the molecularstudyisnested in atropical Americanclade of H.sendtneri ,and isplaced sistertoaBolivianaccession. Bothspeciesare newtoGough Island. Jungermanniales/Herbertaceae/ Herbertus /DNA taxonomy/Gough Island /nrITS INTRODUCTION Molecularstudieshaveimproved the taxonomyof liverworts atdifferent ranks,e.g.,families(Hentschel etal.,2006),genera(Wilson etal.,2007)orspecies (Feldberg etal.,2004). Thesestudiespointed tovast morphologicalhomoplasy of morphologicalcharacterstatesof liverworts and demonstrated the need of an integrativetaxonomythatconsiders evidencefrom bothmorphologyand molecules(Heinrichs etal.,2009). Herbertus S.Graywasonceregarded asanancientgenus (Schuster, 2000);however,recentdivergencetime estimates(Heinrichs etal.,2007)pointto aCenozoicorigin of thisgenus,and speciation events in the Neogene (Feldberg etal.,2007). Herbertus isone of the most difficultgenerain termsof morphologicalcircumscription of species(Feldberg etal.,2004;Feldberg& Heinrichs,2006)and maythereforebenefitfrom the introduction of molecular methods.The problemsin identifying Herbertus speciesarethe consequenceof limited morphologicalvariation in combination withmorphologicalvariation within populationsthatpossess largelysimilarsequences(Feldberg etal.,2004). Asingle representativeof Herbertus hasbeen recognized forthe subantarcticand temperateislandsof the easternSouthernHemispherebyGrolle (2002). Helists Herbertus capensis (Steph.) Sim asthe only Herbertus speciesin the region,ataxon thatisnowtreated asasynonymof H.dicranus (Taylor) *Correspondenceand reprints:[email protected] 68J.Heinrichs,K.Feldberg,H.P.Kreier&J.Vá≈ a Trevis.(Hodgetts,2008). Alternatively,Wace(1961) published H.oldfieldianus (Steph.) Rodwayin hisinvestigation of the vegetation of Gough Island. The latter identification wasmaintained in Wace&Dickson (1965) and Hänel etal. (2005). Morphologicalinvestigation of several Herbertus specimensfrom Gough Island revealed the presenceoftwomorphologicallydivergentphenotype groups. However,assignmentof thesegroupstospeciesproved problematicusing solely morphologicalevidence. Toovercome the problem of morphologicalambiguity (Feldberg etal.,2004),tworecentcollectionsfrom Gough Island wereused fora molecularphylogeneticstudy.Thisstudyallowed foranassignmentof the Gough Island accessionstospeciesclades. MATERIAL AND METHODS DNA-extraction,sequencing and phylogeneticanalyses Twomorphologicallydiverging specimensof Herbertus from Gough Island (Gremmen 2000-170 and 2000-904,PRC, duplicatesin GOET)wereused forthe molecularinvestigation. DNA extraction and sequencing of the nuclear ribosomalinternaltranscribed spacerregion (nrITS)followed the protocols described in Feldberg&Heinrichs(2006). The newsequencesweremanually inserted in the nrITS sequencealignmentof Feldberg etal. (2007)using BioEdit version 5.0.9 (Hall,1999). Asubsetof the nrITS sequencesfrom Feldberg etal. (2007)wasused forthe phylogeneticanalyses(Table 1). Table 1. Geographicorigins,vouchernumbers,and GenBank/EMBL accession numbers of the taxainvestigated. Ifnototherwiseindicated,vouchers areatGOET.Newsequencesin bold. Acc.-Numb. Taxon Origin Voucher nrITS Mastigophoradiclados Reunion SchneiderH05-01 AM259580 Triandrophyllumsubtrifidum Bolivia Churchill etal. 22800 AJ972455 H.aduncus BritishColumbia Schofield 86245 AM259582 H.aduncus subsp. hutchinsiae BritishIsles Rycroft01015 AJ783340 H.delavayi Bhutan Long 28864 AJ972450 H.delavayi BritishColombia Schofield 83644 AM259583 H.delavayi BritishIsles Rycroft030725A AJ783341 H.dicranus Ethiopia(1) Miehe &Miehe 2524 AJ783343 H.dicranus Ethiopia(2) Miehe &Miehe 2435 AM259584 H.dicranus Indonesia Gradstein 10243 AJ783344 H.dicranus Japan Kurita51 (HIRO) AJ972452 H.dicranus Madagascar Pócsetal. 90116/O AJ783346 DNA-based identification of Herbertus specieson Gough Island 69 Table 1. Geographicorigins,vouchernumbers,and GenBank/EMBL accession numbers of the taxainvestigated. Ifnototherwiseindicated,vouchers areatGOET.Newsequencesin bold. Acc.-Numb. Taxon Origin Voucher nrITS H.dicranus Réunion SchneiderH05-02 AM259587 H.dicranus Rwanda SolgaRWA-1117 AM259589 H.dicranus Thailand Schäfer-Verwimp &Verwimp AJ972451 23850 H.juniperoideus subsp .pensilis Bolivia Heinrichsetal. 3998 AM113607 H.juniperoideus subsp .acanthelius Bolivia Heinrichsetal. 4000 AM113600 H.juniperoideus subsp .acanthelius Ecuador Gradstein &Mandl 10144 AJ783339 H.juniperoideus subsp .bivitattus FrenchGuiana HolzFG-00-201 AM113598 H.juniperoideus s . str. Ecuador Schäfer-Verwimp 23346 AM113605 H.juniperoideus Madagascar Pócs9444/D(EGR) AM259592 H.oldfieldianus NewZealand (1) Glenny9584 AM259594 H.oldfieldianus NewZealand (2) Engel 18886 AM259595 H.runcinatus Chile (1) Rycroft031123-1120 AM259596 H.runcinatus Chile (2) Rycroft031202-1125 AM259597 H.runcinatus Gough Island Gremmen 2000-170 FN582125 H.sendtneri Austria Heinrichs4377 AJ783347 H.sendtneri Azores RG2402 AJ783349 H.sendtneri Bhutan Miehe 00-380-01 AM259598 H.sendtneri Bolivia(1) Churchill etal. 22797 AM259599 H.sendtneri Bolivia(2) Heinrichsetal. 4002 AJ783351 H.sendtneri Bolivia(3) Heinrichsetal. 4004 AJ783352 H.sendtneri CostaRica Holz&Schäfer-Verwimp AJ783354 CR 00-77 H.sendtneri Ecuador Heinrichsetal. 4418 AM113611 H.sendtneri Gough Island Gremmen 2000-904 FN582126 H.sendtneri Malaysia Gradstein 10353 AJ972453 H.sendtneri Panama Dauphin etal. 1576 AJ783355 H.stramineus BritishIsles Rycroft00039 AJ783356 Phylogenetictreeswereinferred using maximumlikelihood (ML)criteria implemented in PAUP* 4.0b10(Swofford,2003). Modeltest 3.06 (Posadaand Crandall,1998) wasemployed todetermine the nucleotide substitution model 70 J.Heinrichs,K.Feldberg,H.P.Kreier&J.Vá≈ a withthe smallest numberof parameters thatbest fits the data.The hierarchical likelihood ratio tests selected the TrNmodel (Tamura&Nei,1993)withgamma shape parameterforamong-sitevariation. Thismodel wasimplemented in the ML analysis.The analysiswascarried out asaheuristicsearchwith3random- addition sequencereplicates.Clade support wasassessed bynon-parametric bootstrapping with200 replicates(Felsenstein,1985). Bootstrappercentage values (BSP)above70 wereregarded asgood support (Hillisand Bull,1983). Morphologicalinvestigation Twomorphologicalgroupswereidentified in the Herbertus collections from Gough Island using standardlightmicroscopy.Based on the identification of the twoDNA vouchers representing thesegroups,the collectionsfrom Gough Island wereassigned tospecies. RESULTS The ML analysisyielded asingle optimaltopologywithln= –4072,0731 (Fig. 1). Arobust clade withtwoaccessionsof H.runcinatus (Taylor)Trevis.and the Gough Island specimen Gremmen 2000-170 isplaced sistertothe rest of Herbertus.Aclade with Herbertus oldfieldianus from NewZealand and accessions of H.juniperoideus (Sw.) Grolle from tropicalAmerica and Madagascaris resolved in awell supported sisterrelationship withaclade made upby H. sendtneri (Nees)Lindb., H.aduncus (Dicks.) S.Gray, H.stramineus (Dumort.) Trevis., H.delavayi Steph. and H.dicranus.The well supported H.sendtneri clade comprisesaccessionsfrom Asia, Europe including Macaronesia, aswell asCentral and tropicalSouthAmerica.The Gough Island accession Gremmen 2000-904is nested in aNeotropicalsubclade of H.sendtneri and placed sistertoanaccession from the BolivianAndes.Based on the outcome of the molecularinvestigation, otherrepresentativesof the twomorphologicalgroupswereassigned toeither H. runcinatus or H.sendtneri : Herbertus specimensexamined (from Gough Island) Herbertus runcinatus (Taylor)Trevis.: S-slope of SouthPeak,loosegroupsin bryophyte matin heathland on mountain slope,530 m,15 Sep 1999 coll. N.J.M.Gremmen 99-168 (PRC);Sof Tafelkop,undergrowthinfernbush,slightlysheltered,very damp,300 m,7Jun 2000 coll. N.J.M.Gremmen 2000-0170 (GOET, PRC);top of SouthPeak,on shallow,wet organicsoil,slightlysheltered byboulders,800 m,16Sep 2000 coll. N.J.M.Gremmen 2000- 823 (PRC). Herbertus sendtneri (Nees)Lindb.: Main Glen,Michael’sRidge,1150ft.,21Jan1956,coll. N.M.Wace579 ,det.S.W.Arnell as H.oldfieldianus (cf. Wace,1961:353; BM, UPS); Tafelkop,growing in small numbers in large hepaticmats on very wetpeat,500 m,14 Sep 1999 coll. N.J.M.Gremmen 99-138 (PRC);Tafelkop,extensivemats in bryophytedominated mireonvery wetpeat,500 m,14 Sep 1999 coll. N.J.M.Gremmen 99-141 (PRC);N-side of Tafelkop,large mats on the lowerpart of rockoutcropssurrounded bymire,500 m,15 Sep 1999 coll. N.J.M.Gremmen 99-161 (F, PRC);Waterfall Camp,matof mixed hepaticson very wetpeaty soil in seepage area, 750m,16Sep 2000 coll. N.J.M.Gremmen 2000-873 (F); Waterfall Camp,densemats on very wetpeaty depositon verticalrockfaceinseepage area, DNA-based identification of Herbertus specieson Gough Island 71 Fig. 1. Phylogramrecovered in maximumlikelihood analysisof the nrITS dataset.Bootstrap percentage
Recommended publications
  • Herbertus Ramosus (Herbertaceae, Marchantiophyta) – an Addition to Indian Bryoflora from Arunachal Pradesh with a Note on H
    Lindbergia 39: 1–6, 2016 ISSN 2001-5909 Accepted 12 February 2016 Herbertus ramosus (Herbertaceae, Marchantiophyta) – an addition to Indian bryoflora from Arunachal Pradesh with a note on H. sendtneri Siddhartha Singh Deo and D. K. Singh S. Singh Deo, Botanical Survey of India, Central National Herbarium, Howrah – 711 103, India. – D.K. Singh (singh_drdk@rediffmail. com), Botanical Survey of India, CGO Complex, 3rd MSO Building, F Block (5th Floor), Salt Lake Sector I, Kolkata – 700 064, India. Herbertus ramosus (Steph.) H.A.Mill. and H. sendtneri (Nees) Lindb. are described and illustrated from West Siang District of Arunachal Pradesh in the eastern Himalaya, India. This constitutes the first record ofH. ramosus in Indian bryoflora. It is easily distinguished from hitherto known Indian species of the genus by orange brown plants having falcate leaves with acute leaf lobes 23–40 cells wide at base, up to 8 cells uniseriate towards apex, strongly expanded basal leaf lamina on dorsal side, and strong grooved vitta. Identification key to the Indian species of the genus is provided and its distribution in the country is discussed. The genus Herbertus Gray is represented in India by presence of three species and one subspecies of the genus eight species and one subspecies, viz. H. aduncus (Dicks.) Herbertus in Arunachal Pradesh, viz. H. aduncus subsp. Gray subsp. aduncus, H. armitanus (Steph.) H.A.Mill., aduncus, H. armitanus, H. buchii and H. dicranus (Das H. buchii Juslén, H. ceylanicus (Steph.) Abeyw., H. dicra- and Singh 2012, Singh Deo and Singh 2013, Singh and nus (Taylor ex Gottsche et al.) Trevis., H.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics and Ecology of the Moss Genus Scleropodium (Brachytheciaceae)
    Systematics and ecology of the moss genus Scleropodium (Brachytheciaceae) By Benjamin Elias Carter A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Brent D. Mishler, Chair Professor Bruce G. Baldwin Professor Chelsea D. Specht Spring 2012 Abstract Systematics and ecology of the moss genus Scleropodium (Brachytheciaceae) By Benjamin Elias Carter Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Brent D. Mishler, Chair Scleropodium is a genus of six species in the Brachytheciaceae. Although they are common in north temperate zones, they have not received monographic treatment in over a century. The aims of this study were to test species circumscriptions within the genus with molecular data, complete a thorough global taxonomic treatment of the genus, and to quantitatively investigate the ecological preferences of the species. A molecular phylogenetic study was conducted using 104 individuals spanning the range of morphological variation and the geographic extent of the genus. Maximum Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses and a statistical parsimony network analysis of ITS and the chloroplast rps4, bsbA2 and trnG regions were performed. Although slight differences were found among analyses, there were six clear molecular groups. Five of these corresponded directly to the species Scleropodium californicum, S. cespitans, S. julaceum, S. obtusifolium and S. touretii. The sixth species, S. occidentale, is new to science and is described here. It is similar in ecology and morphology to S. obtusifolium, but has several diagnostic features in both molecular markers and morphological characters.
    [Show full text]
  • BAP Surveillance in Scotland
    Article BAP surveillance in Scotland What is the status of Scotland’s BAP species? Nick Hodgetts, Gordon Rothero & Dave Genney discuss their efforts and methodologies as part of a surveillance programme by Scottish Natural Heritage ne of the mechanisms for species rAcrobolbus wilsonii. Nick Hodgetts conservation in the UK is the Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP). reasons. OThe current list of BAP species was drawn up Our approach has been to collate existing in 2009 and naturally includes many species records, to target fieldwork where it is likely to that occur in Scotland. Some of these are yield most results, and to produce a ‘surveillance relatively well-known – Herbertus borealis, dossier’ giving all the available information for example, now reinstated as a good species on each species. The dossiers are dynamic (Bell et al., 2012; Bell & Long, 2012), is fairly documents, published on the SNH website, and well-known at its one site in the Beinn Eighe updated as and when new data become available. National Nature Reserve, where monitoring has They provide: 1) general information about the been in place for some years. However, there species, including a description; sections on is a substantial subset of Scottish BAP species ecology, distribution in Scotland (including a about which we knew very little when they first full list of sites), the UK and the world; threats; appeared on the list. Therefore, Scottish Natural management and ex situ conservation; 2) a full Heritage (SNH) decided to put a programme literature list and details of the surveillance of surveillance in place to tackle this problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist and Country Status of European Bryophytes – Update 2020. Irish Wildlife Manuals, No
    ISSN 1393 – 6670 N ATIONAL P ARKS AND W ILDLIFE S ERVICE CHECKLIST AND COUNTRY STATUS OF EUROPEAN BRYOPHYTES – UPDATE 2020 Nick Hodgetts & Neil Lockhart I RISH W ILDLIFE M ANUALS 123 National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) commissions a range of reports from external contractors to provide scientific evidence and advice to assist it in its duties. The Irish Wildlife Manuals series serves as a record of work carried out or commissioned by NPWS, and is one means by which it disseminates scientific information. Others include scientific publications in peer reviewed journals. The views and recommendations presented in this report are not necessarily those of NPWS and should, therefore, not be attributed to NPWS. Front cover, small photographs from top row, left to right: Buxbaumia viridis, Neil Lockhart; Marchantia polymorpha, Neil Lockhart; Marchantia quadrata, Nick Hodgetts; Marchesinia mackaii, Nick Hodgetts; Orthothecium rufescens, Nick Hodgetts; Paludella squarrosa, Neil Lockhart; Ptychostomum cernuum, Neil Lockhart; Sphagnum wulfianum, Neil Lockhart; Splachnum luteum, Nick Hodgetts; Syntrichia norvegica, Neil Lockhart Main photograph: Riccia huebeneriana, Neil Lockhart Checklist and country status of European bryophytes – update 2020 Nick Hodgetts1 & Neil Lockhart2 1Cuillin Views, Portree, Isle of Skye, UK; 2National Parks and Wildlife Service, 90 North King Street, Dublin 7, D07 N7CV, Ireland. Keywords: Irish Wildlife Manuals, bryophytes, mosses, liverworts, Europe, checklist, red list, status Citation: Hodgetts, N. & Lockhart,
    [Show full text]
  • Of Liverworts & Hornworts 2011–2012
    Phytotaxa 170 (2): 061–085 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.170.2.1 Early Land Plants Today: Index of Liverworts & Hornworts 2011–2012 LARS SÖDERSTRÖM1, ANDERS HAGBORG2 & MATT VON KONRAT2 1 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway; lars.soderstrom@ ntnu.no 2 Department of Research and Education, The Field Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605–2496, U.S.A.;[email protected], [email protected] Abstract A widely accessible list of known plant species is a fundamental requirement for plant conservation and has vast applications. An index of published names of liverworts and hornworts between 2011 and 2012 is provided as part of a continued effort in working toward producing a world checklist of this group. The list includes 25 higher taxa, 154 species, 31 infraspecific taxa, and 17 autonyms for 2011 and 2012, 12 of them are fossils. A few taxa not covered by the earlier indices for 2000–2010 are also included. 75 species and 15 infraspecific taxa are new to science. Key words: Liverworts, hornworts, index, nomenclature Introduction Under the auspices of the Early Land Plants Today project, there has been a strong community-driven effort attempting to address the critical need to synthesize the vast nomenclatural, taxonomic and global distributional data for liverworts (Marchantiophyta) and hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) (von Konrat et al. 2010a). These endeavours are critical in providing the foundation to develop a working checklist of liverworts and hornworts worldwide; the first version is projected to be published in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Some New Synonyms of Herbertus Sendtneri (Nees) Lindb.(Jungermanniidae: Herbertaceae) from the Neotropics
    Cryptogamie,Bryologie,2005, 26 (4): 411-416 ©2005 Adac.Tous droits réservés Some new synonyms of Herbertus sendtneri (Nees) Lindb.(Jungermanniidae: Herbertaceae) from the Neotropics Kathrin FELDBERG* and Jochen HEINRICHS Department of Systematic Botany,Albrecht von Haller Institute of Plant Sciences, Georg August University Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany (Received 17 January 2005, accepted 11 February 2005) Abstract – Based on morphological investigation of herbarium material, the binomina Herbertus grossispinus (Steph.) Fulf., H. oblongifolius (Steph.) Gradst. & Cleef, Schisma columbiae Steph., S. granatense Steph., S. lechleri Steph., S. striolatum Steph. and the nomen nudum Schisma durandii var. dissectum Herzog are placed in the synonymy of Herbertus sendtneri (Nees) Lindb. Herbertaceae / Herbertus / Neotropics INTRODUCTION Species delimitation in Herbertus Gray (= Schisma Dumort., Herberta Gray mut. Lindb.; Grolle & Florschütz, 1975) is notoriously difficult and subject to much controversy (e.g., Miller,1965; Hodgetts,2003; Feldberg et al.,2004). Until recently, Herbertus sendtneri (Nees) Lindb.was known only from the Austrian Alpes,the Inselberg in Thuringia, Germany,and Asia (Müller,1954; Meinunger & Köckinger,2002). However,a combined morphological - molecular investigation (Feldberg et al.,2004) revealed the presence of Herbertus sendtneri in tropical America where the species was erroneously identified as H. subdentatus (Steph.) Fulf.(Fulford, 1963) or H. dicranus (Taylor ex Gottsche,Lindenb.& Nees) Steph. (Hodgetts,2003). Within Neotropical Herbertus, H. sendtneri stands out by its yellowish colour and the presence of numerous flagellae (Feldberg et al.,2004). The species is furthermore characterized by strongly secund, papillose leaves (Figs 2, 3) with coarse appendages at the base,and a vitta that bifurcates at ca 2/3 up the basal lamina (Figs 1, B, E, H; 2, B, I).
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Occurrence of the Liverwort Herbertus Sendtneri in a Glacial
    Rev. Acad. Colomb. Cienc. Ex. Fis. Nat. 42(164):221-229, julio-septiembre de 2018 Mass occurrence of Herbertus sendtneri in a glacial lake doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.666 Original article Natural Sciences Mass occurrence of the liverwort Herbertus sendtneri in a glacial lake in the Andes of Colombia Robbert Gradstein1,*, Alain Vanderpoorten2, Guido van Reenen3, Antoine Cleef 3 1 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle – Sorbonne Universités, Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversity (ISYEB), Paris, France 2 Department of Conservation Biology and Evolution, Institute of Botany, University of Liège, Belgium 3 Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands Abstract Many bryophytes grow in the Tropics in periodically inundated habitats such as river beds, marshes and waterfalls, but permanently submerged bryophytes are rare and are mainly found in high-altitude lakes. Their identification can be difficult due to modification of morphological traits induced by the aquatic environment. Here we deal with a submerged population of the liverwort genus Herbertus from a glacial lake at 4120 m the Sierra Nevada del Cocuy, Colombia. The aquatic plants, which stand out by dwarf statue and obtuse leaf tips, had been identified asH. oblongifolius, a rare taxon described from Brazil and recently placed in synonymy of the widespread and variable H. sendtneri based on morphology. Molecular analysis confirmed that the aquatic plants belong to H. sendtneri. The resemblance of the aquatic plants to small branches of H. sendtneri suggests that they might represent a juvenile phenotype. The aquatic plants probably originated from a rock-inhabiting population, which dispersed into the lake by means of vegetative reproduction via caducous branches or became washed into the lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 Bryophytes
    Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs Part 2: Detailed Guidelines for Habitats and Species Groups Chapter 12 Bryophytes Authors Sam Bosanquet, David Genney and Jonathan Cox To view other Part 2 chapters and Part 1 of the SSSI Selection Guidelines visit: http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-2303 Cite as: Bosanquet, S.D.S., Genney, D.R. and Cox, J.H.S. 2018. Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs. Part 2: Detailed Guidelines for Habitats and Species Groups. Chapter 12 Bryophytes. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough. © Joint Nature Conservation Committee 2018 Guidelines for the Selection of Biological SSSIs - Part 2: Chapter 12 Bryophytes (2018 revision, v1.0) Cover note This chapter updates and, along with Chapter 13 Lichens and Chapter 14 Non-lichenised fungi, replaces the previous Non-vascular plants SSSI Selection Guidelines chapter (Nature Conservancy Council 1992). It was prepared by Sam Bosanquet (Natural Resources Wales), Jonathan Cox (Natural England) and David Genney (Scottish Natural Heritage), and provides detailed guidance for use in selecting bryophyte sites throughout Great Britain to recommend for notification as SSSIs. It should be used in conjunction with Part 1 of the SSSI Selection Guidelines, as published in 2013 (Bainbridge et al 2013), which detail the overarching rationale, operational approach and criteria for selection of SSSIs. The main changes from the previous version of the chapter are: • only bryophytes (mosses, liverworts and hornworts) are considered; • assemblage scoring is based on ecologically coherent assemblages; • scores for Nationally Scarce species are constant across Britain; • two Atlantic assemblages have scoring systems that include non-Scarce Hyperoceanic species; • a criterion for selecting the largest population of Red List species in each of England, Scotland and Wales is included; and • discontinuation of the Schedule 8 species selection criterion.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryophyte Biology Second Edition
    This page intentionally left blank Bryophyte Biology Second Edition Bryophyte Biology provides a comprehensive yet succinct overview of the hornworts, liverworts, and mosses: diverse groups of land plants that occupy a great variety of habitats throughout the world. This new edition covers essential aspects of bryophyte biology, from morphology, physiological ecology and conservation, to speciation and genomics. Revised classifications incorporate contributions from recent phylogenetic studies. Six new chapters complement fully updated chapters from the original book to provide a completely up-to-date resource. New chapters focus on the contributions of Physcomitrella to plant genomic research, population ecology of bryophytes, mechanisms of drought tolerance, a phylogenomic perspective on land plant evolution, and problems and progress of bryophyte speciation and conservation. Written by leaders in the field, this book offers an authoritative treatment of bryophyte biology, with rich citation of the current literature, suitable for advanced students and researchers. BERNARD GOFFINET is an Associate Professor in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Connecticut and has contributed to nearly 80 publications. His current research spans from chloroplast genome evolution in liverworts and the phylogeny of mosses, to the systematics of lichen-forming fungi. A. JONATHAN SHAW is a Professor at the Biology Department at Duke University, an Associate Editor for several scientific journals, and Chairman for the Board of Directors, Highlands Biological Station. He has published over 130 scientific papers and book chapters. His research interests include the systematics and phylogenetics of mosses and liverworts and population genetics of peat mosses. Bryophyte Biology Second Edition BERNARD GOFFINET University of Connecticut, USA AND A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2447 Introductions V3.Indd
    BRYOATT Attributes of British and Irish Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts With Information on Native Status, Size, Life Form, Life History, Geography and Habitat M O Hill, C D Preston, S D S Bosanquet & D B Roy NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and Countryside Council for Wales 2007 © NERC Copyright 2007 Designed by Paul Westley, Norwich Printed by The Saxon Print Group, Norwich ISBN 978-1-85531-236-4 The Centre of Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) is one of the Centres and Surveys of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). Established in 1994, CEH is a multi-disciplinary environmental research organisation. The Biological Records Centre (BRC) is operated by CEH, and currently based at CEH Monks Wood. BRC is jointly funded by CEH and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (www.jncc/gov.uk), the latter acting on behalf of the statutory conservation agencies in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. CEH and JNCC support BRC as an important component of the National Biodiversity Network. BRC seeks to help naturalists and research biologists to co-ordinate their efforts in studying the occurrence of plants and animals in Britain and Ireland, and to make the results of these studies available to others. For further information, visit www.ceh.ac.uk Cover photograph: Bryophyte-dominated vegetation by a late-lying snow patch at Garbh Uisge Beag, Ben Macdui, July 2007 (courtesy of Gordon Rothero). Published by Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE28 2LS. Copies can be ordered by writing to the above address until Spring 2008; thereafter consult www.ceh.ac.uk Contents Introduction .
    [Show full text]
  • Herbertus Aduncus and H. Sakuraii - Page 2 DRAFT, Version 1.1
    DRAFT, Version 1.1 Draft Management Recommendations for Common scissorleaf (Herbertus aduncus (Dicks.) S.F. Gray ) and Pacific scissorleaf Herbertus sakuraii (Warnst.) Hattori Version 1.1 November 4, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................... 2 I. Natural History ........................................................... 3 A. Taxonomic/Nomenclatural History ...................................... 3 B. Species Description .................................................. 4 1. Morphology .................................................. 4 2. Reproductive Biology ........................................... 5 3. Ecology ..................................................... 5 C. Range, Known Sites ................................................. 5 D. Habitat Characteristics and Species Abundance ............................. 6 II. Current Species Situation ................................................... 6 A. Why Species is Listed under Survey and Manage Standards and Guidelines ........ 6 B. Major Habitat and Viability Considerations ................................ 6 C. Threats to the Species ................................................ 6 D. Distribution Relative to Land Allocations ................................. 7 III. Management Goals and Objectives ........................................... 7 A. Management Goals for the Taxon ....................................... 7 B. Specific Objectives .................................................. 7 IV. Habitat Management ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Early Land Plants Today: Index of Liverworts & Hornworts 2006-2008
    Cryptogamie,Bryologie,2010,31(1):3-30 ©2010Adac.Tous droits réservés EarlyLand Plants Today: Indexof Liverworts &Hornworts 2006-2008 Matt von KONRATa*,Lars SÖDERSTRÖMb ,Anders HAGBORGa , Marshall R.CROSBYc &John J.ENGELa a Departmentof Botany,The Field Museum,1400 SouthLake ShoreDrive, Chicago,IL60605-2496,U.S.A. b Departmentof Biology,NorwegianUniversity of Scienceand Technology, N-7491,Trondheim,Norway c MissouriBotanicalGarden,P.O.Box299,St.Louis,MO63166-0166 U.S.A. (Received 19 August 2009,accepted 21October2009) Abstract –Awidelyaccessible working list of knownplantspeciesisconsidered the number one targetof the GlobalStrategyforPlantConservation. Anindexof published namesof liverworts and hornworts between 2006 and 2008isprovided aspart of acontinued effort in working towardproducing apreliminary world checklist of theseplants.Included in the list arethosenamesoverlooked byearlierindices.The list includesover20highertaxa, 246speciesorinfraspecificvalid names,and three fossils. Liverworts /hornworts /index/nomenclature INTRODUCTION Recently,therehasbeen amajorinternationallycoordinated effort to synthesizethe vast amountof nomenclatural,taxonomicaland globaldistribu- tionaldataforliverworts (Marchantiophyta)and hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) (e.g.,Söderström etal., 2008;von Konrat etal., 2008,2009). Theseendeavours are criticalinproviding the foundation todevelop aworking checklist of liverworts and hornworts worldwide. Thisissignificantbecausethe Convention on BiologicalDiversity (CBD)adopted the GlobalStrategyforPlantConservation
    [Show full text]